Peer Review History

Original SubmissionMay 25, 2024
Decision Letter - Sepiso K. Masenga, Editor

PONE-D-24-21187Hydrogen Decreases Susceptibility to Ang II-induced Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Fibrosis via the NOX4/ROS/NLRP3 and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 Signaling PathwaysPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 02 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sepiso Kenias Masenga, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the experiments involving animals and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, (2) methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia, and (3) efforts to alleviate suffering.

3. Thank you for stating in your Funding Statement: 

"This work was supported by the research projects of Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University [grant number HYDSYTB202125]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now.  Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement. 

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.   

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

6. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section. 

Additional Editor Comments:

As per journal journal guidelines:

1. Relating to the "Financial Disclosure" statement please include Initials of the authors who received each award to clearly show Grant numbers awarded to each author. This statement is required for submission and will appear in the published article if the submission is accepted. Please make sure it is accurate.

2. For Animal Research (involving vertebrate animals, embryos or tissues), Provide the name of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) or other relevant ethics board that reviewed the study protocol, and indicate whether they approved this research or granted a formal waiver of ethical approval. If the study involved non-human primates, add additional details about animal welfare and steps taken to ameliorate suffering. If anesthesia, euthanasia, or any kind of animal sacrifice is part of the study, include briefly which substances and/or methods were applied

Human Subject Research (involving human participants and/or tissue). Give the name of the institutional review board or ethics committee that approved the

study. Include the approval number and/or a statement indicating approval of this research. Indicate the form of consent obtained (written/oral) or the reason that consent was not obtained (e.g. the data were analyzed anonymously)

3. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. [Yes - all data are fully available without restriction]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Zhang et al. studied the role of hydrogen in Ang II-induced Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial

Fibrosis and showed that the NOX4/ROS/NLRP3 and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 Signaling Pathways are involved in the pathogenesis. Although they provided strong evidence for hydrogen’s role in improving atrial fibrillation and fibrosis, the data must be improved. I have the following comments and suggestions.

Line 55, please provide the references.

Figure text is not clean; please improve them.

The images in Figure 2 G are unclear, making it difficult to identify any cells. Please enhance the image quality to make the cells more visible.

In Figure 4, quantification is not visible.

Figures 5A and B are unclear; please provide better images where cardiac tissue is recognizable.

All the images in Figure 6 must be improved. The current images are not clear.

Same with Figure 7 D.

Reviewer #2: The study “Hydrogen Decreases Susceptibility to Ang II-induced Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Fibrosis via the NOX4/ROS/NLRP3 and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 Signaling Pathways” by Zhang et al. investigated the ability of hydrogen in prevention of Atrial Fibrillation and atrial Fibrosis. The study used selective administration of hydrogen and angiotensin II in rats and cell cultures, and employed echocardiography, electrophysiological studies, and biochemical assays to collect pertinent data. Their findings showed that hydrogen reduces susceptibility to Angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated AF and atrial fibrosis in rats. Rats treated with Ang II and hydrogen showed decreased AF susceptibility, reduced atrial fibrosis, lower reactive oxygen species levels, inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation, improved electrical remodeling, and reduced proliferation and migration of cardiac fibroblasts. Hydrogen also enhanced Ca2+ handling and ion channel function by inhibiting NOX4 activity. Furthermore, hydrogen inhibited Ang II-induced atrial fibrosis through the TGF-β1/Smad2/3 pathway. The findings suggest that hydrogen may be an effective treatment for preventing and managing Ang II-mediated AF and atrial fibrosis.

This is a good study, however, to improve its readability and credibility, I suggest the following;

Minor comments

1. The authors should ensure consistent use of abbreviations and terminology, for instance, "AngII" should be consistently written as "Ang II" or "AngII" throughout the manuscript.

2. The authors should work on grammatical errors, and ensure that all abbreviations are in place to improve readability

Major comments

1. The authors should consider specifying the concentrations and passage number of cells used in experiments to ensure consistency and reproducibility of their work since every study is a foundation for the next, clarity is paramount. The following article could offer guidance https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.HYP.27.4.897

2. The protocols for intracellular ROS measurement, intracellular Ca2+ content detection, fibroblast migration, and proliferation assays lack sufficient detail. For reproducibility, the authors should consider including specific details such as concentrations, incubation times, and steps for washing and preparation.

3. The authors should specify the preparation of samples, dilutions used, and steps taken to ensure accuracy and consistency in the ELISA assay. Also, clarify how the GEN5 CHS 3.03 program software was used in the analysis of their findings.

4. The description of the qRT-PCR procedure should include details on the thermal cycling conditions.

5. The statement by the authors that animal care and use protocols were followed is appropriate, however, should consider emphasizing ethical considerations and how animal welfare was maintained throughout the study.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

PONE-D-24-21187

Hydrogen Decreases Susceptibility to Ang II-induced Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Fibrosis via the NOX4/ROS/NLRP3 and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 Signaling Pathways

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 02 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

• A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

• A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

• An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

GENERAL RESPONSE

>>>We, the authors of the article entitled ‘Hydrogen decreases susceptibility to AngII-induced Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Fibrosis via the NOX4/ROS/NLRP3 and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 Signaling Pathways’, received with great appreciation and gladness the reviews made by the experts who took their precious time to positively critique and help us improve our manuscript. We value this process for the role it plays in ensuring a scientifically sound, verifiable and replicable data. Consequently, we have taken our time to go through the manuscript and provided a point-by-point response as raised by the reviewers. The responses provided are as below:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

>>> Response

We thank the editor for this guide. We have ensured our manuscript meets the PLOS ONE style requirements.

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the experiments involving animals and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, (2) methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia, and (3) efforts to alleviate suffering.

>>> Response

We thank the editor for this input. We have stated on the method section that rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital (1%, 50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). This statement is found in line 84.

3. Thank you for stating in your Funding Statement:

"This work was supported by the research projects of Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University [grant number HYDSYTB202125]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now. Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement.

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

>>>Response

We thank the editor for this guideline. We have included the original uncropped western blot images with this submission, as per the request. During some of our western blot experiments, we determined the expression of more than one protein in a single run/gel, and therefore the membrane was pre-cut according to the molecular weight of the proteins under investigation, due to constraints of resources. We have confidence in our original data, which are verifiable and replicable.

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

>>>Response

We agree with the editor on this statement. The corresponding author has included an ORCID ID together with this submission.

6. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

>>>Response

We thank the editor for this response. We have included the ethics statement in the methods section only, and not in any other section as recommended. The ethical statement reads as;

‘The animal experiments approval was done by the Ethical Committee on Animal Experimentation of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China, under the approval No. 20200915. All the procedures were carried out as per the guidelines stipulated by the Helsinki Declaration (1975) and the National Science Council of the Republic of China. Animal welfare was observed throughout this study by ensuring humane handling and well-being of the animals were incorporated into the design and conduct of all procedures during the period of this research.’

Additional Editor Comments:

As per journal journal guidelines:

1. Relating to the "Financial Disclosure" statement please include Initials of the authors who received each award to clearly show Grant numbers awarded to each author. This statement is required for submission and will appear in the published article if the submission is accepted. Please make sure it is accurate.

>>>Response

We thank the editor for this suggestion. We have ensured that the initials of the author who received fundings are captured. As an emphasis, the funding for this research was received by Dr. Yang, the corresponding author.

2. For Animal Research (involving vertebrate animals, embryos or tissues), Provide the name of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) or other relevant ethics board that reviewed the study protocol, and indicate whether they approved this research or granted a formal waiver of ethical approval. If the study involved non-human primates, add additional details about animal welfare and steps taken to ameliorate suffering. If anesthesia, euthanasia, or any kind of animal sacrifice is part of the study, include briefly which substances and/or methods were applied

>>>Response

We are in agreement with the editor on the importance of this instruction. We have included the relevant ethics board that reviewed our study protocol. This statement is found from line 64-69, and it reads as;

The animal experiments approval was done by the Ethical Committee on Animal Experimentation of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China, under the approval No. 20200915. All the procedures were carried out as per the guidelines stipulated by the Helsinki Declaration (1975) and the National Science Council of the Republic of China. Animal welfare was observed throughout this study by ensuring humane handling and well-being of the animals were incorporated into the design and conduct of all procedures during the period of this research.’

Human Subject Research (involving human participants and/or tissue). Give the name of the institutional review board or ethics committee that approved the

study. Include the approval number and/or a statement indicating approval of this research. Indicate the form of consent obtained (written/oral) or the reason that consent was not obtained (e.g. the data were analyzed anonymously)

>>>Response

We thank the editor for this guideline. Our study did not involve any human subjects.

3. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. [Yes - all data are fully available without restriction]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

>>>Response

We thank the editor for this guideline. Our submission contains all the raw data used to generate the entire manuscript.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

>>>Response

We thank the editor for this detailed guideline relating to data. We have uploaded the original uncropped western blot data as supplementary data, and we have not used any data owned by a third party.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

>>>Response

We thank the reviewers for recommending our manuscript as technically sound and for their opinion that our data support the conclusions of this manuscript. We are indeed grateful.

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

>>>Response

We thank the reviewers for acknowledging the appropriateness and rigor of our statistical analysis.

________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

>>>Response

We thank the reviewers for observing all the data that we have made fully available.

________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

>>>Response

We are elated that the reviewers found our manuscript to have been presented in intelligible fashion and standard English.

________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Zhang et al. studied the role of hydrogen in Ang II-induced Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial

Fibrosis and showed that the NOX4/ROS/NLRP3 and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 Signaling Pathways are involved in the pathogenesis. Although they provided strong evidence for hydrogen’s role in improving atrial fibrillation and fibrosis, the data must be improved. I have the following comments and suggestions.

L

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response letter 2.docx
Decision Letter - Sepiso K. Masenga, Editor

Hydrogen Decreases Susceptibility to Ang II-induced Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Fibrosis via the NOX4/ROS/NLRP3 and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 Signaling Pathways

PONE-D-24-21187R1

Dear Dr. Yang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Sepiso K. Masenga, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Zhang et all have addressing my all comments. I do not have any further comments. Thank you. Good luck.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Sepiso K. Masenga, Editor

PONE-D-24-21187R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yang,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Sepiso K. Masenga

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .