Peer Review History

Original SubmissionAugust 27, 2020
Decision Letter - Pasquale Avino, Editor

PONE-D-20-26989

A validated LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, and its metabolites desethylhydroxychloroquine and bisdesethylchoroquine in human plasma

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Huang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 15 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pasquale Avino, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. For reproducibility purposes please clearly specify in your methods section the source of the blood and plasma used in your study (eg. brand, product number)

3. Thank you for stating in your Funding Statement:

"This work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through AIDS clinical Trials Group (ACTG), grant number 1UM1 AI068636 (F.A.). URL: www.NIH.gov. The funder plays no role in the study or prepataion of the manuscript."

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now.  Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement.

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

__________________

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: Comments to Author:

A validated LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, and its metabolites desethylhydroxychloroquine and

bisdesethylchoroquine in human plasma

The paper presented in this study is a validated LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZM) are antimalarial drugs recently reported to be active against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and quantitation method to assess the pharmacokinetics of AZM, HCQ, and its metabolites desethylhydroxychloroquine (DHCQ) and bisdesethylchloroquine (BDCQ) in patients’ plasma. The work is well written and organized and the results are satisfactorily supported by the reported data. Figures and tables are comprehensive and helpful. However, some minor changes are required as discussed in the following:

1. Abstract should be limited to 200 words

2. Keywords should not be the repetitions of the title words, please find such words which are not in the title, this way search engines of the web will find your manuscript with higher probability.

3. Suggestions for improvements in the Title

4. The structure of scientific publication should include the general chapters (Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion). Please follow instructions on journal webpage. Conclusion chapter is missing.

5. Recommendations for future studies are needed in the conclusion section. Kindly provide strong recommendations for future researches.

6. Some citations are missing from the References section.

7. Some references are not cited in the text.

8. Formatting does not match journal criteria. (e.g. References section; section title spacing; paragraph indents)

The paper generates the following kinds of data.

1. Only 20 µL plasma sample by volume is needed for simultaneous quantitation of AZM, HCQ, DHCQ, and BDCQ.

2. The run time is 3.5 min which is fast turnaround time.

3. Statistical measurements are missing in whole of the data which should be added in the manuscript.

However, before I can recommend its publication, the authors should address the following questions

Some questions to author

1. The %differences from controls are 3.8% and -2.9% for AZM, 1.3% and 2.7% for HCQ, -1.9% and -0.9% for DHCQ, and -2.0% and -5.7% for BDCQ. Can author explain what would be the structural changes?

2. Why the study is important, what benefits readers can get from this study?

Reviewer #2: This is an interesting manuscript describing a method to analyze the compounds of interest. The authors follow the FDA and CPQA methodology. The quality of the data and results are outstanding. There are several minor points that the authors should address prior to acceptance of the manuscript. These points are listed below in order of appearance in the paper.

1. Page 5, line 3: There are two periods after [21].

2. Page 6, Figure 1: I recommend having the same relative geometry of the rings in the structure for the last 6 compounds to aid in visualizing the differences between structures.

3. Page 6, Section 2.2: PFP should be defined for the more general reader.

4. Page 7, section 2.4: HLB should be defined for the more general reader.

5. Page 5 and 22-23: These equations should be reformatted and numbered using the recommended standards of the journal.

6. Page 19, end of Room Temperature Stability in Plasma section: (Table] should be replaced with (Table 5).

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Comments from the Editor’s office.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: The manuscript was revised with updated format and style.

2. For reproducibility purposes please clearly specify in your methods section the source of the blood and plasma used in your study (eg. brand, product number)

Response: blank blood and plasma sources are now added.

3. Thank you for stating in your Funding Statement:

"This work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through AIDS clinical Trials Group (ACTG), grant number 1UM1 AI068636 (F.A.). URL: www.NIH.gov. The funder plays no role in the study or prepataion of the manuscript."

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now. Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement.

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: amended funding statement was included in this letter.

4. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

Response: We addressed the “data not shown” issues by providing the data in Supporting S2 Figure and S2 Tables.

__________________

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: Comments to Author:

1. Abstract should be limited to 200 words

Response: The abstract was truncated but still over 300 words limit. We deem exception should be granted in this case as this is a comprehensive assay with 4 analytes.

2. Keywords should not be the repetitions of the title words, please find such words which are not in the title, this way search engines of the web will find your manuscript with higher probability.

Response: additional key words are included: malaria; solid-phase extraction;

3. Suggestions for improvements in the Title

Response: The title is updated as follows: Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for determination of hydroxychloroquine, its two metabolites, and azithromycin in EDTA-treated human plasma.

4. The structure of scientific publication should include the general chapters (Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion). Please follow instructions on journal webpage. Conclusion chapter is missing.

Response: we have revised the conclusion section (4), and discussion was incorporated in the results section.

5. Recommendations for future studies are needed in the conclusion section. Kindly provide strong recommendations for future researches.

Response: In Conclusion section, we discussed the potential use of the method for studies other than Covid-19. We also added the following sentences:

“For it requires only a small sample volume, our method can be used for pediatric studies where sample volume is limited, and it can be coupled with capillary tube sampling by a finger prick or more advanced microsampling techniques such as Seventh Sense Tap� to facilitate clinical studies. With the highly sensitive LC-MS/MS system, our method may be modified for dried blood spot samples.”

6. Some citations are missing from the References section.

Response: The citations in text can all be found in references section

7. Some references are not cited in the text.

Response: All 37 references are now cited in the text using ENDNote program.

8. Formatting does not match journal criteria. (e.g. References section; section title spacing; paragraph indents)

The paper generates the following kinds of data.

1. Only 20 µL plasma sample by volume is needed for simultaneous quantitation of AZM, HCQ, DHCQ, and BDCQ.

2. The run time is 3.5 min which is fast turnaround time.

3. Statistical measurements are missing in whole of the data which should be added in the manuscript.

However, before I can recommend its publication, the authors should address the following questions

Some questions to author

1. The %differences from controls are 3.8% and -2.9% for AZM, 1.3% and 2.7% for HCQ, -1.9% and -0.9% for DHCQ, and -2.0% and -5.7% for BDCQ. Can author explain what would be the structural changes?

2. Why the study is important, what benefits readers can get from this study?

Response: Formatting was updated. The % differences were calculated from the measured control QC-L and QC-H concentrations. The data to calculate the % differences are now provided in Supporting S2 tables.

The method was developed to support potential clinical studies. Readers in the field of COVID-19, malaria, and inflammatory diseases using these drugs may be interested in the method and drug stability data. The small sample volume used in our method will benefit pediatric studies as stated in the conclusion section now. Furthermore, the approaches for method development are exemplary for readers in bioanalysis field,.

Reviewer #2:

1. Page 5, line 3: There are two periods after [21].

Response: The extra period is removed now.

2. Page 6, Figure 1: I recommend having the same relative geometry of the rings in the structure for the last 6 compounds to aid in visualizing the differences between structures.

Response: The Figure 1 is updated.

3. Page 6, Section 2.2: PFP should be defined for the more general reader.

Response: It is now defined as follows: pentafluorophenyl (PFP)

4. Page 7, section 2.4: HLB should be defined for the more general reader.

Response: It is now defined as follows: Hydrophilic lipophilic balance (HLB) solid phase extraction.

5. Page 5 and 22-23: These equations should be reformatted and numbered using the recommended standards of the journal.

Response: The equations are reformatted and numbered now.

6. Page 19, end of Room Temperature Stability in Plasma section: (Table] should be replaced with (Table 5).

Response: It is now corrected.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: ResponseToReviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Pasquale Avino, Editor

Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for determination of hydroxychloroquine, its two metabolites, and azithromycin in EDTA-treated human plasma

PONE-D-20-26989R1

Dear Dr. Huang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Pasquale Avino, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Pasquale Avino, Editor

PONE-D-20-26989R1

Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for determination of hydroxychloroquine, its two metabolites, and azithromycin in EDTA-treated human plasma

Dear Dr. Huang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Pasquale Avino

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .