Fig 1.
The overall architecture of BGSC-Net.
Fig 2.
The overall architecture of EfficientNet-B3.
Fig 3.
The detailed architecture of the GLTB.
Fig 4.
The detailed architecture of the proposed CLSCM.
Fig 5.
The detailed architecture of the proposed ABSM.
Table 1.
Segmentation results of different models on the Potsdam dataset. The values in bold represent the top-performing metrics in the table.
Fig 6.
Visualization results of comparative experiments on the Potsdam dataset.
Table 2.
Boundary accuracy comparison of different models on the Potsdam dataset. The values in bold represent the top-performing metrics in the table.
Table 3.
Segmentation results of different models on the Vaihingen dataset. The values in bold represent the top-performing metrics in the table.
Fig 7.
Visualization results of comparative experiments on the Vaihingen dataset.
Table 4.
Boundary accuracy comparison of different models on the Vaihingen dataset. The values in bold represent the top-performing metrics in the table.
Table 5.
Segmentation results of different models on the LoveDA dataset. The values in bold represent the top-performing metrics in the table.
Fig 8.
Visualization results of comparative experiments on the LoveDA dataset.
Table 6.
Segmentation results of different models on the UAVid dataset. The values in bold represent the top-performing metrics in the table.
Fig 9.
Visualization results of comparative experiments on the UAVid dataset.
Table 7.
Segmentation results of different models on the MSFSD. The values in bold represent the top-performing metrics in the table.
Fig 10.
Visualization results of comparative experiments on the MSFSD.
Table 8.
Ablation experiments on the Potsdam dataset.
Table 9.
Ablation experiments on the Vaihingen dataset.
Table 10.
Ablation experiments on the LoveDA dataset.
Table 11.
Ablation experiments on the UAVid dataset.
Table 12.
Ablation experiments on the MSFSD.
Table 13.
Ablation study on multi-stage bridging strategies in ABSM.
Table 14.
Ablation study on the key components of ABSM.
Fig 11.
Visualization results of ablation experiments on the Potsdam dataset.
Fig 12.
Visualization results of ablation experiments on the Vaihingen dataset.
Fig 13.
Visualization results of ablation experiments on the LoveDA dataset.
Fig 14.
Visualization results of ablation experiments on the UAVid dataset.
Fig 15.
Visualization results of ablation experiments on the MSFSD.
Table 15.
Computational complexity analysis on a single NVIDIA GeForce RTX4090 GPU. The values in bold represent the top-performing metrics in the table.