Table 1.
Comparison of proposed and state of the art algorithms.
Fig 1.
Proposed industrial network architecture.
Fig 2.
Illustrations of different content requests.
Table 2.
Simulation parameters.
Fig 3.
Comparison of content request of both models.
(a) IRM, (b) SNM.
Fig 4.
Comparison of the hit rate and average delay of the proposed and existing algorithms using the SNM model.
(a) variation of hit rate with cache capacity. (b) variation of average delay with cache capacity.
Fig 5.
Comparison of the hit rate and average delay of the proposed and existing algorithms using the IRM model.
(a) variation of hit rate with cache capacity. (b) variation of average delay with cache capacity.
Fig 6.
Comparison of the hit rate and average delay of the algorithms with same size content.
(a) variation of hit rate with cache capacity, (b) variation of average delay with cache capacity.
Fig 7.
Comparison of the hit rate and average delay of the algorithms with different content types.
(a) variation of hit rate with cache capacity. (b) variation of average delay with cache capacity.
Fig 8.
Comparison of the hit rate and average delay of the algorithms with dynamic contents.
(a) variation of hit rate with cache capacity. (b) variation of average delay with cache capacity.
Fig 9.
Performance comparison of proposed and existing algorithms.
(a) variation of hit rate with cache capacity. (b) variation of average delay with cache capacity.