Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

a) Distribution of responses across various STEM majors including psychology and social sciences primarily sociology, education, linguistics, political science, public policy, economics, and others. and b) distribution of responses by number of years spent in Ph.D. program.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Definition of professional development (n = 176).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Table of activities experienced in graduate school, categorized into four tiers.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Plot of PD experiences during Ph.D. training according to discrepancy between what Ph.D. students valued for their PD vs. what they actually experienced (n = 176).

Activities presented in Table 2 are color coded based on the student’s direct PD context. Activities marked red (greatest discrepancy) are related to job search (Tier 4, dark red, 1–4) and expanding professional network beyond academia (Tier 3, light red, 5–8) and activities marked blue (least discrepancy) are related to doctoral program requirements (Tier 1, dark blue, 14–18) and the broader academic community (Tier 2, light blue, 9–13).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Career values of Ph.D. students and alumni (n = 176), when asked to select top three preferences.

The matching colors indicate values that are often conceptualized in a dichotomous manner.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Types of professional mentors of Ph.D. students and alumni (n = 154).

The responses in red indicate mentors who are present within the doctoral program.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Value of peer networks in learning about PD opportunities (n = 175).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 3.

Peer-support in PD (N = 99, 74.4%).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 6.

Value of peers-led events in providing information about PD opportunities (n = 173).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Percentage of alumni respondents (n = 47) within each professional sector, including a breakdown of the type of role within academia.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Support for transitioning to the first job after graduation by percentage of alumni responses (n = 56).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 4.

Challenges in transitioning from doctoral program to first position outside the Ph.D. laboratory (N = 40).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 9.

Alumni responses on a) the most valuable PD activities in doctoral training (n = 43), and b) ways to improve PD activities within doctoral training (n = 40).

More »

Fig 9 Expand