Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of spray and fog devices evaluated in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Photograph of a spray cone being directed into the optical path of the laser diffraction instrument.

Note resulting illumination of the red laser beam.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of device flow rates and recommended surface coverage.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Average volume median diameter for spray devices tested with deionized and tap water.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Cumulative size distributions by volume for the total 360 sprayer, at 6-foot distance, when spraying different liquids.

Blue line = deionized water; red line = tap water; Grey line = disinfectant with dichlor as the active ingredient; Yellow line = disinfectant with hydrogen peroxide as its active ingredient.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Charge/mass ratio for sprayers.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Example photographs for each quadrant of one of the controls (blank, unsprayed) trash cans.

F = front of can; R = right side of can; B = back of can; L = left side of can.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Example photographs for each quadrant of one of the sprayed trash cans.

F = front of can (shown in upper left photo); R = right side of can; B = back of can; L = left side of can.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Example photographs of a clip-on lamp, before and after spraying fluorescent dye solution.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 5.

Fate of active ingredient when spraying hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectant.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Fate of active ingredient when spraying a dichlor-based disinfectant.

More »

Table 6 Expand