Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Most recent observation of Nereocystis presence along shorelines in South Puget Sound (SPS) between 1873 and 2018.

(A) The location of SPS, the southern terminus of the Salish Sea. (B) Bar charts show the most recent year Nereocystis was present in 1-km segments within each sub-basin. Years were binned into 20-year increments, with two bins excluded due to lack of data. (C) The -6.1 m bathymetric contour line denotes all shorelines where Nereocystis occurrence was assessed, classified by the most recent observation of presence (same legend as in B). The gray line denotes absence throughout the time period. The general location of three sub-basins (West, Central and East) is defined at the top of the map, and dotted gray lines on the map identify precise boundaries. Map image based on publicly available data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Synoptic Nereocystis surveys completed in South Puget Sound.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Monthly water characteristics at mid-channel long-term monitoring stations (left) and nearshore stations (right).

(A, B) mean water temperature to 5 m depth. (C, D) mean salinity to 5 m depth. (E) DIN concentration at mid-channel stations at depths of 0 m (solid line) and 10 m (dashed line). (F) DIN concentration at nearshore stations at depths of 0.25 m (point) and 4 m (triangle), with data slightly offset horizontally for visibility. Site locations for (G) mid-channel stations and (H) nearshore stations. Mid-channel long-term monitoring station data (left) represent a cubic spline curve fit to mean values from more than 2 decades of sampling for all stations except NRR001 (3 years). Nearshore stations (right) were sampled monthly at -6.1 m (MLLW) between September 2017 and August 2018. Map image based on publicly available data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Distribution of Nereocystis persistence at 1-km segments (A) before 1980 and (B) after 1980. Persistence was calculated as the proportion of all observations in each segment with Nereocystis present within each time period. All 1-km segments where Nereocystis occurred at least once in either time period were included (n = 120).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Nereocystis extent between 1878 and 2017 in SPS.

(A) Number of 1-km segments with Nereocystis present, based on seven comprehensive snapshot surveys, summarized over three sub-basins. Recent estimates (1999, 2013 and 2017) are dramatically reduced relative to estimates in 1878, 1935 and 1978. The 1911 estimate could represent a low point in kelp extent, but likely reflects methodological differences in survey methods (commercial beds). (B) Time series of the Ensemble Oceanic Niño Index (ENS ONI) [111]. Gray shading indicate years of synoptic snapshot data collection (some spanned multiple years). Black points identify mean ENS ONI values during the growing season in the year of kelp surveys for synoptic snapshots. Gray circles are scaled to represent the percentage of all segments surveyed for a synoptic snapshot during individual years.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Current and wave exposure at 1-km segments with Nereocystis.

The annual mean of maximum daily current velocity (y-axis) was derived from a 2014 model run of the Salish Sea Model [110, 111]. Average annual maximum wave height (x-axis) was modeled between 1950 to 2010 by the Washington Coastal Resilience Project [112]. 1-km kelp segments are coded by sub-basin and the most recent year that Nereocystis was observed (n = 120).

More »

Fig 5 Expand