https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-3914
Figures
Abstract
Kelp forests form an important biogenic habitat that responds to natural and human drivers. Global concerns exist about threats to kelp forests, yet long-term information is limited and research suggests that trends are geographically distinct. We examined distribution of the bull kelp Nereocystis luetkeana over 145 years in South Puget Sound (SPS), a semi-protected inner basin in a fjord estuary complex in the northeast Pacific Ocean. We synthesized 48 historical and modern Nereocystis surveys and examined presence/absence within 1-km segments along 452 km of shoreline. Compared to the earliest baseline in 1878, Nereocystis extent in 2017 decreased 63%, with individual sub-basins showing up to 96% loss. Losses have persisted for decades, across a range of climate conditions. In recent decades, Nereocystis predominantly occurred along shorelines with intense currents and mixing, where temperature and nutrient concentrations did not reach thresholds for impacts to Nereocystis performance, and high current speeds likely excluded grazers. Losses predominated in areas with elevated temperature, lower nutrient concentrations, and relatively low current velocities. The pattern of long-term losses in SPS contrasts with stability in floating kelp abundance during the last century in an area of the Salish Sea with greater wave exposure and proximity to oceanic conditions. These findings support the hypothesis that kelp beds along wave-sheltered shorelines exhibit greater sensitivity to environmental stressors. Additionally, shorelines with strong currents and deep-water mixing may provide refugia within sheltered systems.
Citation: Berry HD, Mumford TF, Christiaen B, Dowty P, Calloway M, Ferrier L, et al. (2021) Long-term changes in kelp forests in an inner basin of the Salish Sea. PLoS ONE 16(2): e0229703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229703
Editor: Maura (Gee) Geraldine Chapman, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Received: February 11, 2020; Accepted: January 18, 2021; Published: February 17, 2021
This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by funding from: the Washington State Department of Natural Resources’ Aquatic Resources Division, Washington Coastal Resilience Project, and U.S. Geological Survey’s Coastal Habitats in Puget Sound Project. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the Washington State or U.S. Government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Humans have altered coastal ecosystems for centuries, yet we frequently lack long-term datasets to quantify changes and their outcomes. While the need for long-term reference points was initially identified in the context of global fisheries [1], it is equally important to understand changes in biogenic habitats, as they are sensitive to disturbance, and losses can trigger changes to broader ecosystem structure and services [2, 3].
Kelp forests (order Laminariales) provide biogenic habitat to a wide range of species [4]. Kelp forests are considered ecosystem engineers [5] because they create structural habitat with distinct local conditions by modifying the physical environment, such as light, water flow, sedimentation, and pH [6, 7]. Extremely high productivity rates create habitat and food for local and distant food webs [8, 9]. Because kelp generally requires cold and nutrient-rich water [10, 11], large-scale climate cycles or changes can influence kelp abundance [12–14]. Grazing from herbivores also strongly influences kelp distribution and abundance [15], with changes in herbivory pressure often linked to changes in predator populations [4, 16, 17].
Kelp forest losses across the globe have generated widespread concern and highlighted considerable data gaps. A recent worldwide synthesis found that 38% of kelp forests declined, although one-third of ecoregions were excluded due to insufficient data, and many analyses were confined to less than 10 years [18]. Divergent trends in nearby locations suggest that, in additional to regional climate trends, local factors can dominate kelp dynamics. Broad-scale and local hydrodynamics have been hypothesized to play a role in areas including British Columbia [19], Nova Scotia [11], Maine [17], and western Norway [20], but the role of water motion is difficult to evaluate because it is rarely independent of other factors [10]. In British Columbia, kelp responses to a broad-scale marine heat wave were mediated by fine-scale environmental heterogeneity; wave-exposed habitats remained stable while wave protected sites experienced near complete losses in kelp diversity [19].
Widespread human activities can impact kelp, including development, agriculture, and forestry [5]. In the last decade, kelp declines and shifts from systems dominated by kelp to turf-forming algae have been documented in Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America (reviewed in [21]). Researchers have identified warming [11, 22], eutrophication [20], acidification [23], changes to community structure [17], and sedimentation [24] as contributing factors that often interact. Other known threats include harvest, pathogens, and non-native algal species [25]. As awareness of losses grows along with predictions for future losses associated with climate warming, scientists and managers have identified a pressing need for better baseline information to provide context for past and predicted environmental changes [26, 27] and to determine the extent to which changes are related to human activities.
The Salish Sea is an extensive fjord estuary complex in the northeast Pacific Ocean that spans the United States and Canada (Fig 1) and the Puget Trough/Georgia Basin ecoregion [28]. The Salish Sea supports 22 species of kelp [29] with the greatest abundance and diversity found along the western Strait of Juan de Fuca [14, 29]. While kelp is less abundant in the inner basins of the fjord complex, bull kelp Nereocystis luetkeana and the understory kelp Saccharina latissima are common [30–32] where appropriate habitat conditions exist, such as coarse substrates in the shallow subtidal zone for holdfast attachment. The Salish Sea has been excluded from studies of kelp trends due to data gaps [5, 18]. In adjacent ecoregions along the open Pacific Ocean coast of Washington, Oregon, and British Columbia, kelp abundance was highly variable on interannual timescales, yet stable over longer time periods [14, 18, 33, 34]. An exception to this general pattern was seen in the eastern extreme of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, where abundance decreased along the shorelines at the entrance to the Salish Sea over the past 100 years [14]. This finding suggests that kelp dynamics may differ within the Salish Sea.
(A) The location of SPS, the southern terminus of the Salish Sea. (B) Bar charts show the most recent year Nereocystis was present in 1-km segments within each sub-basin. Years were binned into 20-year increments, with two bins excluded due to lack of data. (C) The -6.1 m bathymetric contour line denotes all shorelines where Nereocystis occurrence was assessed, classified by the most recent observation of presence (same legend as in B). The gray line denotes absence throughout the time period. The general location of three sub-basins (West, Central and East) is defined at the top of the map, and dotted gray lines on the map identify precise boundaries. Map image based on publicly available data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
South Puget Sound (SPS) represents a geographic and oceanographic end point to the Salish Sea, and it provides an extreme contrast to the adjacent ecoregion for considering long-term trends in kelp. It is the most distant basin from oceanic influence and it naturally experiences lower flushing rates and longer water residence times, which make it particularly sensitive to extreme climate conditions and water quality degradation [35, 36]. Human activities impact water conditions in SPS through point and non-point pollution sources associated with regional development in the SPS watershed, as well as in nearby Central Puget Sound [37].
In this study, we focus on Bull kelp Nereocystis luetkeana (hereafter Nereocystis), the sole species of kelp in the Salish Sea that forms a floating surface canopy. Nereocystis occurs from the Aleutian Islands, AK, to Point Conception, CA [38], and is one of the most common species of canopy-forming kelps [39], occurring in a wide range of habitats from fully wave-exposed to moderately wave-sheltered shorelines [40]. Nereocystis is a ruderal or opportunistic species that thrives following disturbances, exhibits high fecundity and exhibits higher interannual variability than perennial kelp species with which it often co-occurs [10, 14, 34, 39]. In the absence of disturbance, Nereocystis can be replaced by perennial kelp species [16]. The macroscopic sporophyte phase of Nereocystis is primarily an annual, with a holdfast that attaches to coarse substrates, a long stipe connected to a terminal buoyant bulb, and blades that proliferate on the water surface. Like other species of kelp, the sporophyte has an obligatory alternate phase, a microscopic gametophyte, whose ecology is poorly understood and may be vulnerable to different environmental factors [10, 41, 42].
In California and Oregon, satellite imagery has been used to retrospectively examine multi-decadal trends in kelp canopies [13, 34]. However, this technique can be unreliable in portions of the northeast Pacific Ocean where narrow, low-density Nereocystis beds hug the shoreline, strong currents and extreme tides limit acceptable imagery to narrow time windows, and clouds commonly obscure imagery [43–45]. While long-term monitoring data are lacking, diverse data sources have noted the occurrence of Nereocystis in SPS since European exploration began in the mid-1800s. Historically, kelp surface canopies were charted as an aid to navigation [46]. More recently, surface canopies have been surveyed for environmental monitoring and resource management [39]. In addition to these canopy-focused studies, intertidal and dive-based subtidal ecological studies (i.e., [32]) have quantified density and other metrics for Nereocystis over more limited spatial scales.
Here, we synthesized diverse historical and modern data sources in order to understand spatiotemporal patterns in Nereocystis in the SPS and linkages to contemporary observations of climate, water temperature, nutrient concentration, and wave/current energy. We hypothesized that: 1) Nereocystis extent contracted in SPS relative to its historical extent, 2) shifts in Nereocystis extent were not explained by short-term climate conditions, and 3) Nereocystis losses occurred in areas that experienced elevated water temperature, low nutrient concentration, and low wave and current energy in recent decades. Like other syntheses of diverse historical datasets (i.e., [20, 47]), the primary purpose of our assessment is to describe changes over time. We do not have the temporal resolution to fully assess inter-annual variability in kelp abundance, but we can identify broad patterns and relate them to climate conditions at the time of the observations. While we cannot draw conclusions about the causes of observed changes, we can place results in the context of regional data and draw inferences about some likely stressors. Improved understanding of the historical extent of kelp and patterns of change could support further research into stressors and target restoration and conservation actions. It could also increase our understanding of dynamics in the organisms that rely on these habitats.
Methods
Study system
The South Puget Sound (SPS) study area is a 425 km2 water body located at the southern terminus of Puget Sound, within the Salish Sea fjord estuary complex, (Fig 1, approximate location 47.1791093 N, 122.7858146 W). SPS is connected to the northeast Pacific Ocean through a network of deep water basins and shallow sills. Circulation is dominated by tidal currents, superimposed on a two-layered estuarine circulation pattern with a deep inflow of oceanic waters and a surface outflow driven by freshwater input from rivers [36, 48, 49]. SPS has a relatively shallow euphotic zone. Marine nutrient concentrations are naturally high and can be drawn down by strong spring and summer algae blooms with nutrient limitation and eutrophic conditions evident in some areas [50]. Individual basins such as SPS are strongly affected by terrestrial conditions, and longer water residence times make them sensitive to nutrient addition and other types of water quality degradation [36, 51]. SPS is the shallowest major basin (mean depth 37 m) in Puget Sound [48] and has the highest diurnal tidal range, 4.4 m in Olympia [52]. Tidal currents and wave action primarily drive water flow and vertical mixing. The most intense currents and daily mixing in SPS occur at the Tacoma Narrows, a narrow 1.5 km channel with a shallow sill (45 m) that connects SPS to the rest of Puget Sound. The upper water column is well mixed in the central channels of SPS where kelp has been recorded [35].
SPS has complex shorelines composed of islands, passages, and shallow inlets. Wave exposure is low, ranging from semi-protected to very protected in the regional shoreline classification dataset called the ShoreZone Inventory [53]. Due to the area’s glacial origin, gravel, sand, and mixed fine substrates from eroded glacial till and outwash predominate in the intertidal and shallow subtidal zones [30, 54]. Mixed coarse substrates are found along shorelines with strong currents and relatively long fetch. Tide flats of mud or sand predominate at the heads of the inlets and other shallow embayments [30, 48].
Native people have inhabited the region for more than 12,000 years [55]. Limited European settlement began in SPS in the 1820s, and SPS contained the largest population in Puget Sound in 1870 [56]. After 1870, population growth in the cities of Seattle and Tacoma outpaced SPS. The Puget Sound region is now extensively urbanized, with a regional population of more than 4 million in 2019 [57]. A number of human activities have impacted natural systems since European settlement began, with lumber production dominating economic activity. Other important economies in SPS have included fishing, agriculture, and aquaculture. In recent decades, impacts associated with urbanization predominate. Development has brought extensive nearshore habitat loss and degradation [58], with attendant water quality issues pertaining to anthropogenic nutrient loads and contaminants from urban, industrial, and agricultural runoff.
Kelp survey data synthesis
We compiled 48 individual data sources that noted the presence or absence of Nereocystis in SPS, including peer-reviewed publications, maps, charts, reports, and field surveys [30, 32, 59–103]. The datasets spanned from 1873 to 2018 and were produced for a wide range of purposes, including navigation, harvest, resource management, land use planning, and ecological research. The spatial extent of data sources varied from a single location to the entire study area. Format and level of detail also varied widely, including text descriptions of presence or absence at a location, generalized cartographic symbols, delineations of bed perimeter, and phycological studies, which examined detailed plant metrics such as density and phenology. When multiple versions of a data source existed, we chose the most detailed field survey in preference to the final product, which was often edited for cartographic presentation. For example, we selected the hydrographic sheets [59] and the accompanying descriptive reports used to create the navigation charts, whenever available. For the Coast Pilot, which was updated gradually over time, records were grouped into three time periods (1889, 1926, and 1951) following the methods of Thom and Hallum [104]. In eight cases, original data sources were unrecoverable, so we drew data from a compilation of historical data sets [61, 66–68, 70, 86, 87, 93].
We selected a data synthesis approach to accommodate diverse datasets and also recognize two major known sources of uncertainty that limit the precision of Nereocystis canopy observations. First, canopy-forming kelp exhibits high inter-annual variability in extent [14, 105], so a single delineation will generally be a less representative measure of multi-year conditions than for slower growing, longer lived biogenic habitats like coral reefs. Second, tides and currents affect the portion of the canopy that is visible on the water surface over short time periods (hours) in this region [43]. These limitations called for a synthesis approach that generalized Nereocystis observations to the most comparable format.
We developed a linear model to represent Nereocystis presence along the shoreline because the majority of sources depicted the approximate location of Nereocystis rather than precisely delineating the canopy footprint. The linear model captured the common narrow, fringing bed morphology of Nereocystis along the SPS shorelines. We selected a -6.1 m (MLLW) bathymetric contour line because it represents a generalized maximum depth of Nereocystis beds in SPS and more consistently reflects the linear extent of available Nereocystis habitat than intertidal contour lines. A relatively high-quality -6.1 m (MLLW) digital isobath exists, derived from gridded bathymetric data [106].
For all mapped surveys, we transferred information on survey extent and kelp presence from individual data sources to the common bathymetric contour in a geospatial database using ArcMap 10.6.1 [107]. We split the contour line to denote Nereocystis presence/absence alongshore, with a minimum mapping length of 3 m. Features were generally one or more orders of magnitude larger than the minimum mapping unit (S1 Text, S1 Fig). Because many sources depicted Nereocystis presence, rather than precise extent, we subsequently generalized the linear data by summarizing presence/absence over 1-km segments of shoreline. We systematically divided the isobath into 1-km segments, defining 459 segments along the 452 km study area. Of these, 14 segments (3%) deviated from the 1-km length by more than 15%. Twelve segments measured less than 1 km, all occurred along shorelines and islands where the isobath was not an integer multiple of 1 km. Two offshore shoals exceeded 1 km (1.2 and 1.3 km, respectively).
We recorded 3,352 instances of Nereocystis presence/absence between 1873 and 2018 at 1-km segments. At segments where Nereocystis occurred at least once, the number of presence/absence observations per segment over the entire time period ranged from 6 to 13, with a median of 8. We employed the entire pool of observations to explore patterns in most recent Nereocystis occurrence and overall persistence (defined as the proportion of all observations at each 1-km segment that noted Nereocystis presence). We assessed spatiotemporal patterns in Nereocystis distribution using seven synoptic snapshots, separated by 4 to 44 years, that each comprehensively surveyed the study area over a limited time period (Table 1). For simplicity, we refer to each synoptic snapshot by the year it was collected or by the year that the majority of segments were surveyed. We limited the comparison of synoptic surveys to the spatial extent of the smallest survey, which excluded eight 1-km segments at the northeastern boundary of the study area. The seven synoptic snapshots included 93% of the presence/absence observations. Finally, we assessed changes from the oldest historical baseline in 1878 to the most recent synoptic snapshot, conducted in 2017. These two surveys were highly detailed and based on extensive field surveys (Table 1). To compare patterns of kelp abundance and distribution over time within sub-areas, we divided the SPS basin into 3 sub-basins (Fig 1), which partitioned the area along a gradual seasonal gradient in water temperature and nutrient concentrations [35, 51].
Climate conditions
We assessed climate conditions at the time of kelp surveys using the Ensemble Oceanic Niño Index (ENS ONI), a publicly available climate index which spans the study time period and exhibits robust correlations with Multivariate ENSO index, the Extended Multivariate ENSO Index and other indices [111]. We compared the year of each kelp survey to mean ENS ONI during the growing season (March–August) [34]. ENS ONI values during the growing season correlated strongly with the mean of the previous 12 months (r = 0.769, df = 152, p < .001), another predictor employed in kelp and climate comparisons [14].
Water temperature, salinity and nutrient concentration data
We explored the relation of surface water temperature, salinity, and nutrient concentrations to observed kelp distribution through two data sets: long-term data from mid-channel stations, and a single year from nearshore stations. The datasets allowed us to compare spatial patterns at mid-channel vs nearshore locations and temporal patterns over multiple decades vs one year.
Long-term, mid-channel conditions.
We described long-term water properties with publicly available data from four mid-channel water quality stations, sampled monthly by the Washington State Department of Ecology [112]. We restricted our analysis of salinity and temperature to the top five meters of the water column from continuous vertical profiles. We summed nitrate, nitrite and ammonium concentrations to represent dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) at the two shallowest reported depths for nutrients (0 m and 10 m). Monthly values for each parameter at each depth for all available years were reduced to a representative annual pattern using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS). More than two decades of monthly data exist at three of the stations (Fig 2): DNA001 (1989–2016), NSQ002 (1996–2016) and GOR001 (1996–2016). Observations were limited to three years at NRR001 (1989–1991).
(A, B) mean water temperature to 5 m depth. (C, D) mean salinity to 5 m depth. (E) DIN concentration at mid-channel stations at depths of 0 m (solid line) and 10 m (dashed line). (F) DIN concentration at nearshore stations at depths of 0.25 m (point) and 4 m (triangle), with data slightly offset horizontally for visibility. Site locations for (G) mid-channel stations and (H) nearshore stations. Mid-channel long-term monitoring station data (left) represent a cubic spline curve fit to mean values from more than 2 decades of sampling for all stations except NRR001 (3 years). Nearshore stations (right) were sampled monthly at -6.1 m (MLLW) between September 2017 and August 2018. Map image based on publicly available data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
Recent nearshore conditions.
We characterized recent nearshore water column properties along an axis from the entrance to SPS at Tacoma Narrows to the most distal documented kelp forests using data collected at seven nearshore sites monthly from September 2017 to August 2018. This axis encompasses a known environmental gradient [112], and sites were placed near historical and recent Nereocystis beds (Fig 2). All sites were surveyed on the same day, within two hours of solar noon, during low tide and low current periods. A sampling station was established in the center of each site along the -6.1 m (MLLW) bathymetric contour. A weighted SonTek Castaway®-CTD measured temperature and salinity. We calculated mean salinity and temperature for the top 5 m of the water column. From March to September 2018, field-filtered water samples were also collected to measure DIN concentrations at four sites as time permitted (Squaxin Island, Devil’s Head, Day Island, Salmon Beach, Fig 2). From May to September, samples were taken from each site at 0.25 and 4 m depths in order to assess possible surface water stratification during late-spring and summer. In March and April, only 1 sample was collected at 4 m depth. An acid washed 60 mL syringe with an attached 0.45 μm cellulose acetate filter was filled with water directly from a Van Dorn sampler. A small amount of water was filtered through the syringe to rinse the syringe and syringe filter before rinsing an acid washed 60 mL high density polyethylene bottle with filtrate. The bottle was then filled with filtrate before being placed immediately in a cooler on ice and transported to the Evergreen State College laboratory where they were frozen (-10˚ C) for later transport to the University of Washington’s Marine Chemistry Lab for total dissolved nutrient analysis using spectrophotometric methods.
Wave and current exposure characterization
We used modeled current velocity and wave heights to explore the relationship between these physical factors and spatiotemporal patterns in Nereocystis. We limited these comparisons to segments where Nereocystis was observed at least once (n = 120).
We characterized current speed using modeled surface water velocity data from a Salish Sea circulation model [36, 113, 114]. We used data from the surface layer, which represents the top 3% of the water column, from model year 2014. We calculated the annual average of the maximum daily flow velocity (m/s) based on the flow velocities in the x and y directions at each model node. We then summarized velocity with a single value for each 1-km shoreline segment by selecting the value from the closest model grid point. Median distance between model node points and the nearest point on the corresponding shoreline segment was 91 m.
We characterized wave energy using average annual maximum wave height data developed by the Washington Coastal Resilience Project using the numerical wave model SWAN (Simulating WAves Near Shore) [115]. The model generated a hindcast of hourly wave conditions across the Salish Sea over a 60-year period between 1950 and 2010. Modeled values were sampled along the -10 m (NAVD88) bathymetric isobath for SPS and quantified the average annual maximum wave height over the 60-year hindcast. The hindcast utilized the 12-km Weather Research and Forecasting historical reanalysis of the Pacific Northwest [116, 117], which was found to represent the spatial patterns of extreme wind events well but bias wind speeds slightly lower (~1 m/sec) than observed winds over water. Because of this slight bias and because significant wave heights characterize the upper 33% of the wave-height distribution, the wave heights reported here are likely underestimates. We summarized the wave data every 1-km alongshore by selecting the wave model grid point closest to each 1-km segment. Median distance between the model point data and the corresponding shoreline segment was 3.4 m.
Statistical analyses
All data analyses were performed in ArcGIS version 10.6.1 [107] and R 3.6.0 [118]. Data analysis of kelp extent was based on descriptive statistics of spatial and temporal patterns, the disparate methods used across data sources limited the analyses that could be conducted.
We tested if temperature was different among nearshore water column sites (Fig 2) during summer (June to September) or winter (November to February) using two mixed effects models (one for each season) with a random factor of month (temperature ~ site, random = 1|month), with the R packages “nlme” [119] and “emmeans” [119]. We tested if residuals were normally distributed using qqplots and Shapiro-Wilk tests and visually assessed model output for patterns in normalized residuals.
We tested for differences among sub-basins in current speed and wave height at segments where Nereocystis was observed at least once using Welch’s ANOVA to accommodate unequal variance and unequal sample sizes, with the R package “userfriendlyscience” [120]. The wave data were normally distributed, and the current data were log transformed to approximate a normal distribution.
Results
Nereocystis extent declined and spatial distribution shifted
Based on all available data sources, Nereocystis occurred at least once along 26% of the SPS shoreline (120 of 459 1-km shoreline segments) between 1873 and 2018. Nereocystis never occurred in the extreme reaches of any inlets (Fig 1). The East sub-basin contained the greatest proportion of recent occurrences; Nereocystis occurred at 72% of the segments since 2000 and at all segments since 1960 (Fig 1). In contrast, at the majority of segments in the Central and West sub-basins, the most recent Nereocystis occurrence was approximately 4 decades ago (89% and 63% prior to 1980, respectively).
Persistence, measured as the proportion of data sources that noted Nereocystis presence within each 1-km segment, ranged from 0.1 to 1, with a median of 0.3 (S2 Fig). There was a marked difference among sub-basins in Nereocystis persistence before and after 1980 (Fig 3). Before 1980, persistence was similar in West and East (median values of 0.45 and 0.5, respectively) and lower in Central (median = 0.25). After 1980, median persistence dropped to 0 in the West and Central sub-basins. In the East sub-basin, median persistence increased to 1.0, reflecting widespread, high Nereocystis presence. The broad range of persistence values in the East sub-basin after 1980 primarily reflected more observations of Nereocystis absence in the southwestern portion of the Tacoma Narrows (especially within sector 26, S2 Fig).
Distribution of Nereocystis persistence at 1-km segments (A) before 1980 and (B) after 1980. Persistence was calculated as the proportion of all observations in each segment with Nereocystis present within each time period. All 1-km segments where Nereocystis occurred at least once in either time period were included (n = 120).
The extent of Nereocystis present in synoptic snapshots fell into two distinct groups (Fig 4): approximately 60 1-km segments with Nereocystis were identified in 1878, 1935, and 1978 (63, 63, and 58 segments, respectively). In contrast, Nereocystis occurred in one-third or fewer segments in 1911, 1999, 2013, and 2017 (12, 18, 20 and 17 segments, respectively). Differences among datasets in total extent likely reflect both changes in kelp distribution and methodological differences among surveys. The 1911 estimate was the lowest, and it starkly contrasts with the high estimates before (1878) and after (1935). The 1911 estimate could have marked a minimum in Nereocystis extent; however, the purpose of the survey (to identify beds with harvest potential) could have led to identification of a limited number of large, accessible beds rather than an exhaustive survey (Table 1, S1 Text, S1 Fig, Results section). The three most recent estimates (1999, 2013, and 2017) showed dramatically restricted extent relative to 1878, 1935, and 1978, and similar extent to 1911.
(A) Number of 1-km segments with Nereocystis present, based on seven comprehensive snapshot surveys, summarized over three sub-basins. Recent estimates (1999, 2013 and 2017) are dramatically reduced relative to estimates in 1878, 1935 and 1978. The 1911 estimate could represent a low point in kelp extent, but likely reflects methodological differences in survey methods (commercial beds). (B) Time series of the Ensemble Oceanic Niño Index (ENS ONI) [111]. Gray shading indicate years of synoptic snapshot data collection (some spanned multiple years). Black points identify mean ENS ONI values during the growing season in the year of kelp surveys for synoptic snapshots. Gray circles are scaled to represent the percentage of all segments surveyed for a synoptic snapshot during individual years.
The synoptic snapshots showed a marked shift in the spatial distribution of kelp forests among sub-basins (Fig 4). The Central sub-basin contained the majority of shorelines with Nereocystis in 1878, 1911, 1935, and 1978 (79%, 50%, 71% and 53%, respectively). In contrast, the Central basin contained 17% or less of the total extent in the three most recent surveys (17% in 1999, 10% in 2013, and 12% in 2017). The West sub-basin generally contained a smaller proportion of the total shoreline with Nereocystis than the Central sub-basin (12–25%); in 2017 they contained equal portions of the total extent (12% each). Decreases in Central and West corresponded to proportional increases in total extent in the East: the proportion in the East ranged from 2–44% during the earliest four surveys, and 65–76% in the three most recent surveys.
Compared to the earliest baseline in 1878, Nereocystis extent in 2017 decreased 63% throughout the SPS study area. The most extreme losses occurred in the Central sub-basin (96%), followed by the West sub-basin (83%), while the East sub-basin increased.
Nereocystis data sources represent diverse climate conditions
Nereocystis data sources reflect a wide range in climate conditions. El Niño conditions (positive ENS ONI anomalies which are unfavorable for kelp) predominated in the earliest and the most recent synoptic snapshots, while relatively neutral or cool La Niña conditions predominated in the middle decades (Fig 4). High variability was also evident over short time periods. The most unfavorable ENS ONI growing season value (2.0) occurred in 1878 when 72% of the study area was surveyed during an extreme El Niño [121]. The remaining 28% of the segments within that synoptic snapshot were surveyed in cooler climate conditions (ENS ONI was -0.9 and -0.6 during the growing season in 1873 and 1879, respectively). Cooler, favorable climate conditions predominated during 1911 (-0.5), 1935 (-0.5 for 66% of segments and -0.2 during 34% of segments), and 1978 (-0.6). The majority of the 1999 synoptic snapshot (88%) occurred during strong La Niña conditions in 1999 (-1.68), while a minor portion (12%) occurred during a strong El Niño in 1997 (1.8). The penultimate synoptic snapshot captured cool conditions in 2013 (-0.5). Four years later, the final survey in 2017 captured warm conditions (0.5) following a strong El Niño in 2014–2016 and global marine heatwave [122].
Sea surface temperature and nutrient data show strong gradient
Water temperature, salinity, and nutrient concentration data displayed strong seasonal and spatial patterns that were similar at the long-term mid-channel stations and the nearshore stations sampled in 2017–2018 (Fig 2). For the winter nearshore temperature data, the likelihood ratio test indicated that including site did not improve the final mixed effects model (L = 4.7, df = 1, p = 0.034), indicating that average winter water temperature did not differ among sites. In contrast, nearshore summer water temperatures varied markedly among sites (L = 52.52, df = 1, p < 0.001). Post-hoc tests confirmed that the magnitude of differences in summer temperature increased with geographic distance between sites. Minimum annual temperatures (8°C) occurred during February/March, with less than 1°C difference among all stations. From March to October, the warmest water consistently occurred in the West sub-basin at adjacent locations in Dana Passage (DNA001 mid-channel station) and Squaxin Island (nearshore station), with slightly higher measurements at nearshore stations. The highest overall water temperature recorded at a nearshore station occurred at Squaxin Island in July 2018 (16.2°C). The coolest spring-fall temperatures consistently occurred in the East sub-basin at adjacent locations in the Tacoma Narrows (NRR001 mid-channel station) and Salmon Beach (nearshore station). At Salmon Beach, nearshore temperature peaked at 13.9°C in August 2018. Central sub-basin water temperatures fell midway between the extremes measured at Tacoma Narrows and Dana Passage at all the mid-channel and nearshore stations, with a consistent gradient of values increasing with distance from the Tacoma Narrows. The water column at all nearshore stations was well mixed even in July during peak annual temperatures, with less than 0.5°C range per cast between the surface and 5 m depth [103].
Salinity ranged from 28–30 PSU (long-term curve-fit) at mid-channel stations, with similar values and annual patterns at nearshore stations. Salinity was higher in the summer and late fall, a common pattern in the region associated with seasonal rainfall and freshwater input cycles. Extreme salinity values occurred at the geographic extremes of Tacoma Narrows and Dana Passage. Nearshore salinity ranged from 27.1 PSU in February at Squaxin Island to 30.3 PSU at Salmon Beach in November.
Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) concentrations at mid-channel stations were high in the winter months at all stations: 25 μM and greater at depths of 0 m and 10 m (Fig 2). Values diverged throughout the spring, with pronounced differences among sites from May to October. Concentrations were slightly higher at depth. A strong spatial gradient emerged, with decreasing concentrations into SPS and the most extreme drawdown of nutrients at Dana Passage, where the long-term mean fell below 10 μM at both 0 m and 10 m depth from June to September. Nearshore DIN concentrations showed a similar pattern for all months with data. Nearshore concentrations were indistinguishable at stations sampled during March 2018, ranging from 26–26 μM at 4 m depth. Concentrations at Squaxin dropped every successive month until August, reaching the lowest concentration measured at any site in August 2018 (0.4 μM at 0.25 m depth). In contrast, nearshore DIN concentrations at the other stations never dropped below 10 μM.
Recent Nereocystis observations predominated in high current areas
Average maximum daily current velocities ranged from 0.14 to 2.59 m/s (median 0.52 m/s) at segments where Nereocystis was observed at least once during the entire study period (Fig 5). These current velocities differed among sub-basins (Welchs ANOVA test: F(2, 116) = 61.85, p < 0.001). The East sub-basin experienced significantly larger current velocities than the West and Central sub-basins (Games Howell post hoc test, p<0.001), where the median value (1.63 m/s) was approximately 4 times larger than in the West (0.42 m/s) and Central (0.48 m/s) sub-basins. Comparison of historical Nereocystis observations with current velocity data showed all of the segments where Nereocystis has not been observed since 1980 or earlier experienced current velocities of 1 m/s or less. After 2000, the majority of segments with Nereocystis were restricted to shorelines with mean maximum daily currents above 1 m/s, which were predominantly located in the East sub-basin. However, the segments where Nereocystis persisted in West and Central sub-basins range in current velocity from 0.31–0.82 m/s.
The annual mean of maximum daily current velocity (y-axis) was derived from a 2014 model run of the Salish Sea Model [110, 111]. Average annual maximum wave height (x-axis) was modeled between 1950 to 2010 by the Washington Coastal Resilience Project [112]. 1-km kelp segments are coded by sub-basin and the most recent year that Nereocystis was observed (n = 120).
Average annual maximum wave height ranged from 0.28 m to 0.99 m (median 0.62 m) at segments where kelp was observed at least once during the entire study time period throughout SPS. Wave height did not differ among sub-basins (Welchs ANOVA test: F(2, 116) = 0.7, p = 0.50) but displayed high spatial variability dependent on shoreline orientation. Locations facing south/north recorded higher annual maximum wave heights, indicative of the dominant wind directions in Puget Sound. Median values within the sub-basins ranged from 0.58–0.70 m. No patterns were evident over time in the range of wave heights at segments where Nereocystis was observed (Fig 5).
Discussion
Major Nereocystis losses and shift in distribution
This study established a historical 1878 baseline for Nereocystis distribution in SPS, early in the period of European settlement. We described major losses from that baseline in both extent and distribution over 145 years. The most extreme decreases occurred in the Central and West sub-basins; the most recent dataset identified a single location with Nereocystis remaining in each of these sub-basins (S2 and S3 Figs). Many of the observed losses in the West and Central sub-basins have persisted for four decades or longer, in a range of climate conditions. In contrast, the East sub-basin appeared stable or increasing.
The observed trend of Nereocystis decrease in SPS over 145 years contrasts sharply with findings along the Strait of Juan de Fuca, at the entrance to the Salish Sea. There, kelp forest area generally remained stable over the last century, except along the eastern boundary—the area farthest from oceanic influence and closest to anthropogenic development [14]. This contrasting pattern of adjacent sub-regions experiencing loss and stability has occurred in other locations globally [11, 17, 19, 20].
Conditions associated with observed patterns in Nereocystis
The pattern of kelp contraction over time was apparent across both extreme and neutral ENSO conditions. The longest temporal comparison (1878 and 2017) captured Nereocystis extent during two extremely unfavorable El Niño events. More recently, relatively low kelp extent occurred during both favorable conditions (2013) and El Niño conditions following a profound marine heatwave (2017). This finding strongly suggests that the long-term pattern of Nereocystis loss is not an artifact of climate conditions at the time of the surveys. While the dataset lacks the temporal resolution for a statistical comparison of kelp and climate indices, it is striking that high/low Nereocystis extent did not track favorable/unfavorable climate conditions more strongly. We believe the relatively coarse scale of mapping (presence/absence along 1-km segments), which likely masked differences in abundance that occurred in response to climate conditions. At intensively monitored sites, differences in abundance measurements within 1-km segments were detected between 2013 and 2017 [103].
Climate indices provided a tractable method to broadly compare conditions in this study; however, within the Salish Sea they do not correlate as tightly to temperature, and presumably other oceanographic conditions, as along shorelines on the exposed coast [123–125]. Also, the Salish Sea has experienced higher magnitude increases over recent decades in SST than along the adjacent exposed coastline and global averages [123–125]. One hypothesis, which we lack the data to test, is that Nereocystis losses in SPS occurred as a series of contractions in response to discrete climate events and other stressor pulses, with recovery between these events limited by long-term temperature increases, other ongoing stressors, and increasing distance between spore sources. While the historical data in this study lacked sufficient temporal resolution for us to quantify the relationship to climate indices, two notable climate events corresponded to observed Nereocystis declines. The 1978 synoptic snapshot provided the most recent measure of high Nereocystis extent, and it was followed by a large decline which coincided with a shift from a cold to a warm regime defined in Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) data [126]. Following the 1978 snapshot, small scale surveys showed a gradual disappearance from many segments in the subsequent two decades, culminating in a substantially reduced magnitude in the 1999 synoptic snapshot (S2 Fig). Similarly, smaller declines occurred between 2013 and 2017, coinciding with a period of warm sea surface temperature in the northeast Pacific Ocean known as ‘the Blob’ [127]. Since then, small scale surveys have recorded disappearance at additional segments (S2 and S3 Figs). Marine heatwaves doubled globally between 1982 and 2016 and are projected to become more frequent and extreme [128].
While temperature and nutrient concentration data were not available for the majority of the study period (1870s-1980s), long-term data from recent decades characterized general conditions and short-term data demonstrated similar patterns mid-channel and near shore. Elevated temperatures and low nutrient concentrations occurred in tandem in SPS, a pattern seen in upwelling systems along the exposed coast and in other areas within the Salish Sea [12, 129–133]. In SPS, summer temperatures were shown to be considerably higher and nutrient concentrations were lower compared to the exposed coast and Strait of Juan de Fuca where upwelling and ocean mixing drive water column properties [134]. Many studies have shown that kelp is sensitive to high temperatures and low nitrogen. An 18-year study concluded that temperature increases from a thermal outfall were associated with the virtual disappearance of Nereocystis [135]. In British Columbia, elevated temperatures have been associated with lower abundance of Nereocystis [105] and other kelp species [19]. In SPS, Nereocystis appeared stable in the East sub-basin, where all temperature measurements in this study remained below the proposed range (14.5–16°C) for a physiological thermal threshold for Nereocystis [34] and also below the 14.0°C threshold identified in southern California for compromised Macrocystis performance related to nutrient concentrations [136]. In contrast, recent summer temperatures at nearshore stations and long-term mid-channel means in the West and Central sub-basins consistently fell within or exceeded the proposed threshold for Nereocystis (and always exceeded the lower Macrocystis threshold). Additional sampling within the Squaxin Island kelp forest documented even higher temperatures than at the nearshore stations, ranging from 17 to 20°C [103]. These temperature maxima approached or exceeded thresholds for decreased resilience of sporophytes and increased zoospore mortality [42, 137, 138].
Nitrogen requirements for Nereocystis are not precisely defined, yet data suggest that low summer concentrations in recent decades may be affecting Nereocystis performance in portions of SPS. The authors observed that the Nereocystis blades at Squaxin Island were thin, short and shredded. In field studies of nitrogen fertilization, concentrations of 10 μM were associated with thicker blade tissues and a lower rate of blade erosion in Macrocystis sporophytes [139]. Laboratory studies showed increased performance in microscopic stages of Nereocystis associated with DIN increases from 1 to 15 μM [42]. Nitrogen requirements are likely greater during periods of rapid growth or elevated temperatures [140]. In Puget Sound, anthropogenic inputs are a major local source of DIN [141]. However, worldwide research predicts that elevated anthropogenic nutrient loads damage kelp performance by stimulating growth of phytoplankton [36] and nuisance algae, and introducing particulates and other pollutants and contaminants [21, 142]. While long-term trends are not well understood, anthropogenic DIN inputs in Puget Sound have altered dissolved oxygen levels and algal biomass [36], and the nutrient balance appears to have shifted in recent decades with potential impacts to species composition and material cycling [143, 144].
Exceptions exist to the general pattern of Nereocystis losses in sub-basins with higher temperatures and lower nutrients. The innermost bed at Squaxin Island remained highly persistent despite the poorest measured environmental conditions. This exception demonstrates that Nereocystis can persist in elevated temperature and low nutrient conditions. The authors believe that the site’s long fetch from prevailing southern winds and extensive appropriate shallow subtidal habitat contribute to Nereocystis persistence. However, even there, intensive surveys found that total bed area and maximum depth decreased between 2013 and 2018 [103].
Many studies have demonstrated that hydrodynamic exposure to waves and currents influences kelp dynamics directly and indirectly. Along exposed coastlines, physical disturbance through extreme wave events can drive kelp mortality [13]. Low water motion can limit the capacity of kelp to acquire nutrients and eliminate waste products [5, 145]. In relatively sheltered environments in other regions, wave exposure metrics were positively correlated with greater kelp performance and negatively correlated with elevated temperature [19]. SPS has a relatively protected wave environment, with short-period waves (<5 sec) that have significantly less energy than long-period ocean swell in other habitats where Nereocystis occurs. In SPS, current velocity is the primary source of daily water turbulence, and strong tidal currents lead to lower temperatures and higher nitrogen levels through mixing, especially at the Tacoma Narrows [146]. These factors could explain the observed pattern of Nereocystis losses in low current areas versus persistence in recent years in intermediate and high current areas. Areas of intense mixing may constitute kelp refugia from physical stressors, and low current areas may exacerbate the negative effects of stressors. The extent that waves further mix the water column to mitigate or compound other stressors to kelp in areas of low tidally driven circulation remains uncertain but likely important given observed variability in wind speeds and directions spatially and at interannual to decadal time scales.
Currents can also mediate biotic stressors. Sea urchins, the most studied kelp grazers, were observed to be absent or rare in SPS. The small snail Lacuna vincta has been shown to play an important role in mortality to Nereocystis in hydrodynamically quiescent habitats in The Salish Sea [40]. While Lacuna snails were not commonly observed in SPS in 2017 and 2018, kelp crabs (Pugettia producta) were abundant on the blades, bulbs and stipes in the Nereocystis forests that were not subjected to regular, intense currents. Kelp crabs preferentially consume fresh Nereocystis in Puget Sound, and laboratory and field experiments suggest that they may play an important role in mediating the growth and survival of Nereocystis in the Salish Sea [147, 148].
Many other factors that are known to drive kelp abundance, and are outside the scope of this study, likely also played a role in the observed changes in Nereocystis distribution. Estuarine circulation, winds and waves exhibit interannual variability, and perhaps long-term trends, that could be particularly important to habitat conditions in areas with low tidal currents. Human activities—especially logging and coastal development—have increased sediment [149–152], nutrient [142], and pollutant loads to coastal ecosystems [141]. These factors are associated with the global ‘flattening of kelp forests,’ through altering competitive interactions with turf algae [21]. In SPS, widespread deforestation began in the mid-1850s, and extensive clear-cut logging and river channelization radically altered sediment delivery to nearshore marine areas and sediment dynamics [153]. Fishing pressure often alters grazer populations by decreasing top-down controls from predation [4, 16, 17]. In SPS, rockfish [154] and other groundfish [155], salmonids [156], and forage fish [157] populations have been dramatically reduced relative to historical levels. These species occupy middle to high trophic positions, directly and indirectly influencing populations of kelp grazers [17, 158]. Alterations to trophic dynamics can also facilitate competition between Nereocystis and other macroalgae. In the absence of disturbance, perennial algae can exclude annual kelp species such as Nereocystis [16]. At sites where Nereocystis persisted or was lost in SPS, hard surfaces in the shallow subtidal were generally colonized by algae or invertebrates. The prostrate kelp Saccharina latissima and the invasive perennial alga Sargassum muticum, which can exclude Nereocystis [25], were observed at many historical and current Nereocystis sites in SPS. Compounding the effects of these diverse stressors, sporophyte mortality may impact basin wide bed connectivity as most spores settle within a few meters of the parent sporophyte [159].
Conclusion
This study synthesized diverse data sources to fill a gap in understanding of long-term trends in kelp. We identified substantial Nereocystis losses over 145 years in South Puget Sound (SPS), the southernmost basin of the Salish Sea. The shift in distribution and extent was consistent over a range of climate conditions and has persisted for decades, which strongly suggests it was not due to short-term, inter-annual variability.
When analyzed with environmental data from recent decades, patterns of Nereocystis persistence and loss in SPS provide some insights into potential environmental drivers. As expected based on the literature, Nereocystis extent generally decreased along shorelines that experienced higher temperatures and lower nutrient concentrations in recent decades, suggesting that these physical factors played a role in losses. Additionally, in recent decades, Nereocystis predominantly occurred along shorelines with intense currents and mixing, where temperature and nutrient concentrations did not reach thresholds for impacts to Nereocystis performance and under conditions that can exclude grazers. These patterns suggest that in areas sheltered from waves, intense currents and deep-water mixing may provide refugia from physical and biological stressors.
The contrast between floating kelp losses in SPS and stability along the wave-exposed coastline supports the hypothesis that, in the northeast Pacific Ocean, kelp beds along wave-sheltered shorelines exhibit higher sensitivity to environmental stressors [19]. In addition to factors considered here, human development likely played a role in Nereocystis losses through altering physical characteristics and trophic relationships. The ubiquity of wave-sheltered shores [19], and potentially distinct kelp trends in these habitats, suggests that existing regional kelp assessments [18, 160] are incomplete for the northeast Pacific Ocean. These results underscore the importance of assessing kelp across a wide range of physical conditions when assessing long-term trends, causes of change and possible management responses.
Supporting information
S1 File. Data used in this study.
Excel spreadsheet with tabular data used in analyses and geographic coordinates identifying the center point of each 1 km shoreline segment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229703.s001
(XLSX)
S1 Text. Comparison of synoptic survey methods and results.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229703.s002
(PDF)
S1 Fig. Distribution of the length of individual Nereocystis features in comprehensive snapshot surveys.
The distribution of kelp bed feature length in six comprehensive surveys, ranging from a median of less than 0.1 km (2017) to 1.5 km (1911). Differences in length are likely to be related to both survey resolution and actual length of kelp features.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229703.s003
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Persistence of Nereocystis at segments and sectors (groups of segments).
(A) Map shows persistence at segments, calculated as the proportion of all observations with Nereocystis present. Segments where Nereocystis never occurred are not shown. The maps also identify sectors (groups of adjacent segments aggregated into stretches of shoreline <10 km in length), with numeric identifiers for each sector and black tick marks delineating boundaries. Gray line denotes shorelines where Nereocystis was never recorded. (B) Sectors are identified by reference number listed on map and geographic name. Chart summarizes all observations as presence/absence at the scale of sector by survey year. Color denotes presence (blue) or absence (gray). Shapes represent dataset type. Map image based on publicly available data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229703.s004
(TIF)
S3 Fig. Most recent Nereocystis distribution in SPS.
The -6.1 m bathymetric contour line is divided into 1-km segments, showing shorelines where Nereocystis was present during the most recent survey in 2017 or 2018 (pink), present in at least one previous survey but not in the most recent survey (blue), and never recorded (gray). Map image based on publicly available data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229703.s005
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We thank many scientists who contributed to field work and data synthesis, including Jeff Gaeckle, Julia Ledbetter, Betty Bookheim, Kate Sherman, Olivia Hannah, Melissa Sanchez, and Lauren Johnson. We thank Tarang Khangaonkar, Christopher Krembs and Julia Bos for providing environmental data. We are grateful to Ron Thom for important work on this topic. We thank Cathy Pfister and Megan Dethier for insightful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their thoughtful comments, which led to substantial improvements to the manuscript. HB designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the paper with input from all authors. TM, BC, MC, LF, EG and NV collected and analyzed data and contributed to writing. PD assisted with analysis and writing. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government or the Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
References
- 1. Anecdotes Pauly D. and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 1995;10(10):1. pmid:21237093
- 2. Graham HM. Effects of local deforestation on the diversity and structure of southern California giant kelp forest food webs. Ecosystems. 2004;7(4):341–57.
- 3. Pratchett MS, Hoey A, Wilson S. Reef degradation and the loss of critical ecosystem goods and services provided by coral reef fishes. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2014;7:37–43.
- 4. Steneck RS, Graham MH, Bourque BJ, Corbett D, Erlandson JM, Estes JA, et al. Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environmental Conservation. 2002;29(04):436–59.
- 5.
Wernberg T, Krumhansl K, Filbee-Dexter K, Pedersen MF. Chapter 3—Status and Trends for the World’s Kelp Forests. In: Sheppard C, editor. World Seas: an Environmental Evaluation (Second Edition): Academic Press; 2019. p. 57–78.
- 6. Eckman J, Duggins D, Sewell A. Ecology of understory kelp environments. I. Effects of kelps on flow and particle transport near the bottom. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 1989;129: 173–87.
- 7. Pfister CA, Altabet MA, Weigel BL. Kelp beds and their local effects on seawater chemistry, productivity, and microbial communities. Ecology. 2019;100(10):e02798. pmid:31233610
- 8. Krumhansl KA, Scheibling RE. Production and fate of kelp detritus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2012;467:281–302.
- 9. Mann KH. Seaweeds—their productivity and strategy for growth. Science. 1973;182(4116):975–81. pmid:17833778.
- 10. Dayton PK. The ecology of kelp communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1985;16:215–45.
- 11. Filbee-Dexter K, Feehan CJ, Scheibling RE. Large-scale degradation of a kelp ecosystem in an ocean warming hotspot. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2016;543:141–52.
- 12. Dayton PK, Tegner MJ, Edwards PB, Riser KL. Temporal and spatial scales of kelp demography: The role of oceanographic climate. Ecological Monographs. 1999;69(2):219–50.
- 13. Cavanaugh KC, Siegel DA, Reed DC, Dennison PE. Environmental controls of giant-kelp biomass in the Santa Barbara Channel, California. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2011;429:1–17.
- 14. Pfister CA, Berry HD, Mumford T. The dynamics of kelp forests in the Northeast Pacific Ocean and the relationship with environmental drivers. Journal of Ecology. 2018;106:1520–33.
- 15. Poore AGB, Campbell AH, Coleman RA, Edgar GJ, Jormalainen V, Reynolds PL, et al. Global patterns in the impact of marine herbivores on benthic primary producers. Ecology Letters. 2012;15(8):912–22. pmid:22639820
- 16. Duggins DO. Kelp beds and sea otters: an experimental approach. Ecology. 1980;61: 447–53.
- 17. Steneck RS, Leland A, McNaught DC, Vavrinec J. Ecosystem flips, locks, and feedbacks: the lasting effects of fisheries on Maine’s kelp forest ecosystem. Bulletin of Marine Science. 2013;89(1):31–55.
- 18. Krumhansl KA, Okamoto DK, Rassweiler A, Novak M, Bolton JJ, Cavanaugh KC, et al. Global patterns of kelp forest change over the past half-century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113(48):13785. pmid:27849580
- 19. Starko S, Bailey LA, Creviston E, James KA, Warren A, Brophy MK, et al. Environmental heterogeneity mediates scale-dependent declines in kelp diversity on intertidal rocky shores. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0213191. pmid:30913219
- 20. Moy FE, Christie H. Large-scale shift from sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) to ephemeral algae along the south and west coast of Norway. Marine Biology Research. 2012;8(4):309–21.
- 21. Filbee-Dexter K, Wernberg T. Rise of Turfs: A New Battlefront for Globally Declining Kelp Forests. BioScience. 2018;68(2):64–76.
- 22. Wernberg T, Bennett S, Babcock RC, de Bettignies T, Cure K, Depczynski M, et al. Climate-driven regime shift of a temperate marine ecosystem. Science. 2016;353(6295):169. pmid:27387951
- 23. Connell SD, Russell BD. The direct effects of increasing CO2 and temperature on non-calcifying organisms: increasing the potential for phase shifts in kelp forests. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010;277(1686):1409–15. pmid:20053651
- 24. Rubin SP, Miller IM, Foley MM, Berry HD, Duda JJ, Hudson B, et al. Increased sediment load during a large-scale dam removal changes nearshore subtidal communities. Plos One. 2017;12(12). WOS:000417469900006. pmid:29220368
- 25. Britton-Simmons KH. Direct and indirect effects of the introduced alga Sargassum muticum on benthic, subtidal communities of Washington State, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004;277:61–78.
- 26. Straub SC, Wernberg T, Thomsen MS, Moore PJ, Burrows MT, Harvey BP, et al. Resistance, extinction, and everything in between–the diverse responses of seaweeds to marine heatwaves. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2019;6(763).
- 27.
Calloway M, Oster D, Mumford TF Jr., Berry H. Puget Sound kelp conservation and recovery plan Olympia, WA: Northwest Straits Commission; 2020. p. 52. Available from: https://nwstraits.org/our-work/kelp/.
- 28. Spalding MD, Fox HE, Allen GR, Robertson J, et al. Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience. 2007;57(7):573–83.
- 29.
Gabrielson PW, Lindstrom SC. Keys to the Seaweeds and Seagrasses of Southeast Alaska, British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon. Vancouver, British Columbia: University of British Columbia; 2018. 180 p. Available from: https://alliance-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?tab=default_tab&search_scope=all&vid=UW&fn=search&query=lsr02,contains,1036987349&lang=en_US.
- 30.
Berry HD, Harper JR, Mumford TF Jr., Bookheim BE, Sewell AT, Tamayo LJ. The Washington State ShoreZone Inventory User’s Manual. Olympia, WA: Nearshore Habitat Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources; 2001. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-publications.
- 31.
Mumford TF Jr. Kelp and Eelgrass in Puget Sound. Seattle, WA: Seattle District, US Army Corps of Engineers; 2007. p. 27. Available from: http://www.pugetsoundnearshore.org/technical_papers/kelp.pdf.
- 32. Maxell BA, Miller KA. Demographic studies of the annual kelps Nereocystis luetkana and Costaria costata (Laminariales, Phaeophyta) in Puget Sound, Washington. Botanica Marina. 1996;39(3):479–89.
- 33. Shelton AO, Harvey CJ, Samhouri JF, Andrews KS, Feist BE, Frick KE, et al. From the predictable to the unexpected: kelp forest and benthic invertebrate community dynamics following decades of sea otter expansion. Oecologia. 2018. pmid:30311056
- 34. Hamilton SL, Bell TW, Watson JR, Grorud-Colvert KA, Menge BA. Remote sensing: generation of long-term kelp bed data sets for evaluation of impacts of climatic variation. Ecology. 2020;101(7):e03031. pmid:32108936
- 35. Albertson SL, Erickson K, Newton JA, Pelletier G, Reynolds RA, Roberts ML. South Puget Sound Water Quality Study: Phase 1. Environmental Assessment Program; 2002. p. 224 pgs. Available from: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/documents/0203021.pdf.
- 36. Khangaonkar T, Nugraha A, Xu W, Long W, Bianucci L, Ahmed A, et al. Analysis of hypoxia and sensitivity to nutrient pollution in Salish Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 2018;123:4735–61.
- 37.
Mohamedali F, Roberts MHR, Sackmann B, Whiley AJ, Kolosseus A. South Puget Sound dissolved oxygen study: interim nutrient load summary for 2006–2007. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Ecology; 2011. p. 179. Available from: www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/1103001.html
- 38. Druehl LD. The pattern of Laminariales distribution in the northeast Pacific. Phycologia. 1970;9:237–47.
- 39. Springer YP, Hays CG, Carr MH, Mackey MR. Toward Ecosystem-Based Management of Marine Macroalgae—the Bull Kelp, Nereocystis Leutkeana. Oceanography and Marine Biology. 2010;48:1–42.
- 40. Duggins D, Eckman JE, Siddon CE, Klinger T. Interactive roles of mesograzers and current flow in survival of kelps. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2001;223:143–55.
- 41. Carney LT, Edwards MS. Cryptic processes in the sea: a review of delayed development in the microscopic life stages of marine macroalgae. Algae. 2006;21(2):161–8.
- 42. Muth AF, Graham MH, Lane CE, Harley CDG. Recruitment tolerance to increased temperature present across multiple kelp clades. Ecology. 2019;100(3). pmid:30615200
- 43. Britton-Simmons KH, Eckman JE, Duggins DO. Effect of tidal currents and tidal stage on estimates of bed size in the kelp Nereocystis luetkeana. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2008;355:95–105.
- 44. Nijland W, Reshitnyk L, Rubidge E. Satellite remote sensing of canopy-forming kelp on a complex coastline: A novel procedure using the Landsat image archive. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2019;220:41–50.
- 45. Schroeder SB, Boyer L, Juanes F, Costa M. Spatial and temporal persistence of nearshore kelp beds on the west coast of British Columbia, Canada using satellite remote sensing. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2020;6(3):327–43.
- 46.
US Coast Survey. Sailing directions for the west coast of North America embracing the coasts of Central America, California, Oregon, Fuca Strait, Puget Sound, Vancouver Island, and the islands and rocks off the coasts of Central America and California. Coast Pilot. London, England: James Imray 102 Minories; 1853. p. 239. Available from: https://historicalcharts.noaa.gov/publications_cp.
- 47. Orth RJ, Moore K. Distribution and abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay: an historical perspective. Estuaries. 1984;7(4B):531–40.
- 48.
Burns R. The shape and form of Puget Sound. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press; 1985.
- 49.
Strickland RM. The fertile fjord. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press; 1983.
- 50. Mackas DL, Harrison PJ. Nitrogenous Nutrient Sources and Sinks in the Juan de Fuca Strait/Strait of Georgia/Puget Sound Estuarine System: Assessing the Potential for Eutrophication. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 1997;44(1):1–21.
- 51.
Roberts MJ, Bos J, Albertson S. South Puget Sound Dissolved Oxygen Study: Interim Data Report. Washington State Department of Ecology; 2008. Available from: www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0803037.html.
- 52.
Mofjeld H, Larsen L. Tides and tidal currents in the inland waters of Western Washington. Seattle, WA1984. p. 52 pp.
- 53.
Nearshore Habitat Program. The Washington State ShoreZone Inventory. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Natural Resources; 2001. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-inventory.
- 54.
Dethier M. A marine and estuarine habitat classification system for Washington State. Olympia, WA: Washington Natural Heritage Program, Department of Natural Resources; 1990. p. 56. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_marine_class.pdf?734qo.
- 55.
Jepsen DJ, Norberg DJ. Contested Boundaries: A New Pacific Northwest History: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2017. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?id=xCUtDgAAQBAJ.
- 56.
U.S. Census Office. Report on the population of the United States at the eleventh census: 1890. Part 1. Washington, DC: Department of the Interior; 1895. Available from: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1895/dec/volume-1.html.
- 57.
Washington State Office of Financial Management. State of Washington: 2019 population trends. Olympia, WA: Washington State Office of Financial Management, Forecasting and Research Division; 2019. p. 50. Available from: https://www.ofm.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/dataresearch/pop/april1/ofm_april1_poptrends.pdf.
- 58.
Simenstad C, Ramirez M, Burke J, Logsdon M, Shipman H, Tanner C, et al. Historical Change and Impairment of Puget Sound Shorelines. Seattle, WA: Puget Sound Ecosystem Restoration Project; 2011. p. 313. Available from: http://www.pugetsoundnearshore.org/technical_papers/change_analysis.pdf.
- 59.
US Coast Survey. Topographic sheet. Register No. 1327a. Section XI, No. 1. Budd’s Inlet, Wash. Ter. 1873. Available from: http://riverhistory.ess.washington.edu/tsheets/framedex.htm.
- 60.
US Coast Survey. Topographic sheet. Register No. 1327b. Section XI. No. 2. Budd’s Inlet, Wash. Ter. 1873. Available from: http://riverhistory.ess.washington.edu/tsheets/framedex.htm.
- 61.
US Geological Survey. Hydrographic sheet. In: Thom Ronald M. Hallum Loann. 1990. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington; 1875. p. 116. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 62.
US Coast Survey. Topographic sheet. Register No. 1674. Section XI. Carrs Inlet, Wash. Ter. 1877–78. Available from: http://riverhistory.ess.washington.edu/tsheets/framedex.htm.
- 63.
US Coast Survey. Topographic sheet. Register No. 1672. Section XI. Topography of Puget Sound, Wash. Ter. from Nisqually River to Totten Inlet. 1878. Available from: http://riverhistory.ess.washington.edu/tsheets/framedex.htm.
- 64.
US Coast Survey. Topographic sheet. Register No. 1671. Section XI. Puget Sound: from Pt. Defiance to Ketron Isd. Washington Territory, 1877–78. 1878. Available from: http://riverhistory.ess.washington.edu/tsheets/framedex.htm.
- 65.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Topographic sheet. Register No. 1528. Case’s Inlet from it’s head to Herron Island and Pickering Passage, Puget Sound. 1879–1880. Available from: http://riverhistory.ess.washington.edu/tsheets/framedex.htm.
- 66.
US Geological Survey. Hydrographic sheet. In: Thom Ronald M. Hallum Loann. 1990. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington; 1886. p. 116. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 67.
Coast and Geodetic Survey. US Coast Pilot. 7, Pacific Coast: California, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii and Pacific Islands. In: Thom Ronald M. Hallum Loann. 1990. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington; 1889. p. 116. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 68.
US Geological Survey. Hydrographic sheet 6460. In: Thom Ronald M. Hallum Loann. 1990. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington; 1891. p. 116. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 69.
Cameron F. Potash from kelp. Washington, DC: US Govt. Print. Off.; 1915. Available from: https://catalog.lib.uchicago.edu/vufind/Record/3318402.
- 70.
Coast and Geodetic Survey. US Coast Pilot. 7, Pacific Coast: California, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii and Pacific Islands. In: Thom Ronald M. Hallum Loann. 1990. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington; 1926. p. 116. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 71.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 5931. South End of Colvos Passage, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1935. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 72.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6102. Hale Passage, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1935. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 73.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6103. South End of Carr Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1935. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 74.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6104. Nisqually Reach to Fox Island, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1935. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 75.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6105. North End of Carr Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1935. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 76.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic Sheet Register No. 6106. Balch and Drayton Passages, Puget Sound, Washington: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 1935. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 77.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic Sheet Register No. 6107. Case Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 1935. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 78.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. No. 6108. Case Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1935. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 79.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6197. Devils Head to Dana Passage and Henderson Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1936. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 80.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6198. Eld and Budd Inlets and Vicinity, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1936. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 81.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6199. Budd Inlet and Olympia Harbor, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1936. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 82.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6202. Eld Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1936. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 83.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6203.Totten and Skookum Inlets, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1936. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 84.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey No. 6204. Pickering and Peale Passages, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1936. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 85.
US Coast and Geodetic Survey. Hydrographic survey. No. 6205. Hamersley Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington: Department of Commerce; 1936. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 86.
Coast and Geodetic Survey. US Coast Pilot. 7, Pacific Coast: California, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii and Pacific Islands. In: Thom Ronald M. Hallum Loann. 1990. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington; 1951. p. 116. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 87.
Washington State University. Kelp mapping in: Thom Ronald M. Hallum Loann. 1990. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington; 1954. p. 116. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 88.
Phillips R. Shallow subtidal surveys by scuba and snorkel at sites in Puget Sound for Seattle Pacific College and University of Washington. Seattle, WA1962-63. p. 146. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_phillips_dive_log_1962_1963.pdf?fm90e8.
- 89. Harlin MM. A Phycological Survey of Steamboat Island, Thurston County, Washington State. Syesis. 1969;2:257–61.
- 90.
National Ocean Service. Hydrographic Sheet Register No. 9682. Nisqually Reach: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 1977. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 91. Hodgson LM, Waaland JR. Seasonal variation in the subtidal macroalgae of Fox Island, Puget Sound Washington. Syesis. 1979;12:107–12.
- 92.
Washington Department of Wildlife. Original field mapping of kelp for the Coastal Zone Atlas: Thom Ronald M. Hallum Loann. 1990. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington; 1978. p. 116. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 93.
Washington State Department of Fisheries. Kelp surveys 1975–1989. In: Thom Ronald M. Hallum Loann. 1990. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Seattle, WA: Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington; 1975–1989. p. 116. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 94.
West JE. Personal communication regarding observations of Nereocystis luetkeana by the Washington Departmnent of Fish and Wildlife during rockfish surveys in South Puget Sound during the 1992 field year. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Fisheries; 1992. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_west_wdfw_divelog.pdf.
- 95.
Nearshore Habitat Program. Boat-based canopy delineation of floating kelp canopy at Squaxin Island. In: Assessment of bull kelp at Squaxin Island in 2013, 2014 and 2016. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Natural Resources; 1994. p. 39. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-publications.
- 96.
National Ocean Service. Hydrographic Sheet Descriptive Report. Register No. 10684. Dana Passage. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 1996. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 97.
National Ocean Service. Hydrographic Sheet Descriptive Report. Register No. 10714. Nisqually Reach. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 1996. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 98.
National Ocean Service. Hydrographic Sheet Register No. 10667. Wyckoff Shoal to Balch Passage. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 1996. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 99.
National Ocean Service. Hydrographic Sheet Descriptive Report. Register No. 11042. Nisqually Reach. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 2001. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 100.
Berry H. 2004 Color-infrared kelp survey at Squaxin Island. In: Assessment of bull kelp at Squaxin Island in 2013, 2014 and 2016. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Natural Resources Nearshore Habitat Program; 2004. p. 39. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-publications.
- 101.
National Ocean Service. Hydrographic Sheet Descriptive Report. Registry No. 11550. Southern Portion of Colvos Passage. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 2008. Available from: https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/.
- 102.
Berry H. Assessment of bull kelp at Squaxin Island in 2013, 2014 and 2016. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Natural Resources Nearshore Habitat Program; 2017. p. 39. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-publications.
- 103.
Berry H, Calloway M, Ledbetter J. Bull kelp monitoring in South Puget Sound in 2017 and 2018. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Natural Resources Nearshore Habitat Program; 2019. p. 72. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-publications.
- 104.
Thom RM, Hallum L. Long-term changes in the areal extent of tidal marshes, eelgrass meadows and kelp forests of Puget Sound. Final Report to Office of Puget Sound, Region 10, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Wetland Ecosystem Team, Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington, 1990 1990. Report No: FRI-UW-9008, EPA 910/9-91-005. Available from: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr_nrsh_thom_hallum_1990.pdf?7m1gy.
- 105. Foreman RE. Studies on Nereocystis growth in British Columbia, Canada. Hydrobiologia. 1984;116/117:325–32.
- 106.
Nysewander DR, Evenson JR, Murphie BL, Cyra TA. Report of Marine Bird and Marine Mammal Component, Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program for July 1992 to December 1999 Period. Olympia, Washington: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife; 2005. p. 194. Available from: https://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01135.
- 107.
ESRI. ArcGIS. Redlands, CA2019. Available from: https://www.esri.com/en-us/home.
- 108.
Shalowitz A. Shore and sea boundaries. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce US Coast and Geodetic Survey; 1964. Available from: https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/about/docs/history-of-coast-survey/shore-and-sea-boundaries-volume-two.pdf.
- 109.
Collins BD, Sheikh AJ. Historial reconstruction, classification and change analysis of Puget Sound tidal marshes. University of Washington Puget Sound River History Project Department of Earth and Space Sciences. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Natural Resources; 2005. Available from: http://www.pugetsoundnearshore.org/supporting_documents/historical_shoreline_dnr.pdf.
- 110.
Youngmann C. Coastal zone atlas of Washington. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Ecology and University of Washington Cartographic Laboratory; 1978. Available from: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/2373183.
- 111.
Ensemble Oceanic Nino Index (ENS_ONI) [Internet]. 2019 [cited Accessed 13 May 2020]. Available from: https://www.webberweather.com/ensemble-oceanic-nino-index.html.
- 112.
Bos J, Keyzers M, Haermanson L, Krembs C, Albertson S. Quality Assurance Monitoring Plan: long-term marine waters monitoring, water column program. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Ecology; 2015. p. 200. Available from: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/1503101.html.
- 113. Khangaonkar T, Sackmann B, Long W, Mohamedali T, Roberts M. Simulation of annual biogeochemical cycles of nutrient balance, phytoplankton bloom(s), and DO in Puget Sound using an unstructured grid model. Ocean Dynamics. 2012;62(9):1353–79.
- 114. Khangaonkar T, Long W, Xu W. Assessment of circulation and inter-basin transport in the Salish Sea including Johnstone Strait and Discovery Islands pathways. Ocean Modelling. 2017:11–32. WN0219060.
- 115.
VanArendonk NR. Assessing coastal vulnerability to storm surge and wave impacts with projected sea level rise within the Salish Sea. Bellingham, WA: Western Washington University; 2019.
- 116.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA US Department of Commerce. NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis Monthly Mean Subsets (from D5090.0), 1948-continuing: Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory. 1996. Available from: http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds090.2/.
- 117.
Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, et al. A description of the advanced research WRF Version 3 (No. NCAR/TN-475+STR). NCAR Technical Note. Boulder, CO, USA: National Center for Atmospheric Research; 2008. Available from: https://opensky.ucar.edu/islandora/object/technotes:500.
- 118.
R CoreTeam. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/.
- 119.
Russell L, Singmann H, Love J, Buerkner P, Herve M. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R Package version 1.4.3.01. 2019. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
- 120.
Peters G-J, Verboon P, Green J. userfriendlyscience: Quantitative Analysis Made Accessible. Version 0.7.2. 2018. Available from: http://userfriendlyscience.com.
- 121. Wolter K, Timlin MS. El Niño/Southern Oscillation behaviour since 1871 as diagnosed in an extended multivariate ENSO index (MEI.ext). International Journal of Climatology. 2011;31(7):1074–87.
- 122.
Cold and warm episodes by season [Internet]. 2020 [cited September 28, 2020]. Available from: https://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ONI_v5.php.
- 123. Amos CL, Martino S, Sutherland TF, Al Rashidi T. Sea Surface Temperature Trends in the Coastal Zone of British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Coastal Research. 2014;31(2):434–46.
- 124. Masson D, Cummins PF. Temperature trends and interannual variability in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Continental Shelf Research. 2007;27(5):634–49.
- 125. Riche O, Johannessen SC, Macdonald RW. Why timing matters in a coastal sea: Trends, variability and tipping points in the Strait of Georgia, Canada. Journal of Marine Systems. 2014;131:36–53.
- 126. Hare SR, Mantua NJ. Empirical evidence for North Pacific regime shifts in 1977 and 1989. Progress in Oceanography. 2000;47(2):103–45.
- 127. Gentemann CL, Fewings MR, García-Reyes M. Satellite sea surface temperatures along the West Coast of the United States during the 2014–2016 northeast Pacific marine heat wave. Geophysical Research Letters. 2017;44(1):312–9.
- 128. Frölicher TL, Fischer EM, Gruber N. Marine heatwaves under global warming. Nature. 2018;560(7718):360–4. pmid:30111788
- 129. Druehl LD. Distribution of two species of Laminaria as related to some environmental factors Journal of Phycology. 1967;3:103–8. pmid:27064813
- 130. Druehl LD. The distribution of Macrocystis integrifolia in British Columbia as related to environmental parameters. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1978;56:69–79.
- 131.
Schiel DR, Foster MS. The biology and ecology of giant kelp forests. Oakland, CA: University of California Press; 2015.
- 132. Capone DG, Hutchins DA. Microbial biogeochemistry of coastal upwelling regimes in a changing ocean. Nature Geoscience. 2013;6(9):711–7.
- 133. Pfister CA, Wootton JT, Neufeld CJ. The relative roles of coastal and oceanic processes in determining physical and chemical characteristics of an intensively sampled nearshore system. Limnology and Oceanography. 2007;52(5):1767–75.
- 134. Pfister CA, Altabet MA, Post D. Animal regeneration and microbial retention of nitrogen along coastal rocky shores. Ecology. 2014;95(10):2803–14.
- 135. Schiel DR, Steinbeck J.R. and Foster M.S. Ten years of induced ocean warming causes comprehensive changes in marine benthic communities. Ecology. 2004;85(7):1833–9.
- 136. Tegner MJ, Dayton PK. El Nino effects on southern California kelp forest communities. Advances in Ecological Research. 1987;17:243–79.
- 137.
Schiltroth B, Bisgrove S, Heath B, editors. Effects of warm ocean temperatures on bull kelp forests in the Salish Sea. Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference; 2018 April 4, 2018; Seattle, WA.
- 138. Gaitán-Espitia JD, Hancock JR, Padilla-Gamiño JL, Rivest EB, Blanchette CA, Reed DC, et al. Interactive effects of elevated temperature and pCO2 on early-life-history stages of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2014;457:51–8.
- 139. Stephens TA, Hepburn CD. A kelp with integrity: Macrocystis pyrifera prioritises tissue maintenance in response to nitrogen fertilisation. Oecologia. 2016;182:71–84 pmid:27170330
- 140. Dean T, Jacobsen F. Nutrient-limited growth of juvenile kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, during the 1982–1984 “El Niño” in southern California. Mar Biol. 1986;90:597–601.
- 141.
Mohamedali T, Roberts ML, Sackman B, Kolosseus A. Puget Sound Dissolved Oxygen Model: Nutrient Load Summary for 1999–2008. Olympia, Washington: Washington State Department of Ecology; 2011. p. 144. Available from: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/summarypages/1103057.html.
- 142. Howarth RW, Sharpley A, Walker D. Sources of nutrient pollution to coastal waters in the United States: Implications for achieving coastal water quality goals Estuaries. 2002;25(4):656–76.
- 143.
Krembs C. Eutrophication in Puget Sound. 2013. In: State of Physical, Biological, and Selected Fishery Resources of Pacific Canadian Marine Ecosystems in 2012 [Internet]. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document; [106–12]. Available from: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Csas-sccs/publications/resdocs-docrech/2013/2013_032-eng.pdf.
- 144.
Krembs C, M. Dutch, Partridge V, Weakland S, Bos J, Albertson S, et al. Changes in nutrient ratios drive changes in pelagic and benthic assemblages, and benthic-pelagic coupling in Puget Sound: A compelling hypothesis linking water quality and the benthos. Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference; April 30–May 2, 2014.; Seattle, WA2014.
- 145.
Hurd CL, Harrison PJ, Bischof K, Lobban CS. Seaweed Ecology and Physiology. 2 ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/seaweed-ecology-and-physiology/03C6C5D9B88980CA0C4F0863E0472233.
- 146.
Ebbesmeyer CC, Jack WQ, Clifford BA. Puget Sound: A Fjord system homogenized with water recycled over sills by tidal mixing In: Kjerfve B, editor. Hydrodynamics of Estuaries: II Estuarine Case Studies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1988.
- 147. Dobkowski K, Kobelt J, Brentin S, Van Alstyne KL, Dethier MN. Picky Pugettia: a tale of two kelps. Mar Biol. 2017;164(210).
- 148. Dobkowski K. The role of kelp crabs as consumers in bull kelp forests—evidence from laboratory feeding tri-als and field enclosures. PeerJ 2017;5:e3372. pmid:28560113
- 149. Airoldi L, Cinelli F. Effects of sedimentation on subtidal macroalgal assemblages: an experimental study from a Mediterranean rocky shore. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1997;215(2):269–88.
- 150. Airoldi L. Roles of disturbance, sediment stress, and substratum retention on spatial dominance in algal turf. Ecology. 1998;79(8):2759–70. ISI:000077501000014.
- 151. Seapy R, Littler M. Population and species diversity fluctuations in a rocky intertidal community relative to severe aerial exposure and sediment burial. Mar Biol 1982;71:87–96.
- 152. Schiel DR, Foster MS. The population biology of large brown seaweeds: Ecological consequences of multiphase life histories in dynamic coastal environments. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2006;37:343–72. ISI:000243038500013.
- 153. Grossman EE, Stevens AW, Dartnell P, George D, Finlayson D. Sediment export and impacts associated with river delta channelization compound estuary vulnerability to sea-level rise, Skagit River Delta, Washington, USA. Marine Geology. 2020;430:106336.
- 154.
Palsson WA, Tsou TT, Bargmann GG, Buckley RM, West JE, Mills ML, et al. The biology and assessment of rockfishes in Puget Sound. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; 2009. Available from: https://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00926.
- 155.
Palsson Wayne A., Northup Thomas J., Barker MW. Puget Sound groundfish management plan. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; 1998. p. 48. Available from: https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/00927/wdfw00927.pdf.
- 156.
National Marine Fisheries Service. Endangered and Threatened Species: Final listing determination for 16 ESUs of West Coast salmon, and final 4(d) protective regulations for threatened ESUs. 2005. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2005/06/28/05-12351/endangered-and-threatened-species-final-listing-determinations-for-16-esus-of-west-coast-salmon-and.
- 157. Greene C, Kuehne L, Rice CA, Fresh K, Penttila D. Forty years of change in forage fish and jellyfish abundance across greater Puget Sound Washington (USA): anthropogenic and climate associations. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2015;525:153–70.
- 158. Davenport AC, Anderson TW. Positive indirect effects of reef fishes on kelp performance: the importance of mesograzers. Ecology. 2007;88(6):1548–61. pmid:17601146
- 159. Gaylord B, Nickols KJ, Jurgens L. Roles of transport and mixing processes in kelp forest ecology. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2012;215(6):997. pmid:22357593
- 160. Smale DA, Wernberg T, Oliver ECJ, Thomsen M, Harvey BP, Straub SC, et al. Marine heatwaves threaten global biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. Nature Climate Change. 2019.