Table 1.
The nine values of biophilia [15].
Table 2.
Post validation engagement activities relating to the values of the Biophilia Hypothesis.
Table 3.
The mean engagement scores for the engaging with and valuing indicators (N = 203).
Table 4.
Inter-Correlations between valuing being able to engage with the nine values of biophilia (N = 203).
Table 5.
Inter-Correlations between engaging with the nine values of biophilia (N = 203).
Table 6.
Simple mediation of the indirect effects of engaging with humanistic, moralistic and symbolic values on nature connectedness (N = 203; 5000 bootstrap samples).
Table 7.
Simple mediation of the indirect effects of valuing humanistic, naturalistic and moralistic values on nature connectedness (N = 203; 5000 bootstrap samples).
Table 8.
Replacement biophilia activity items used in study 2.
Table 9.
The mean engagement scores for the engaging and valuing indicators (N = 118).
Table 10.
Inter-Correlations between engaging with the six biophilic values (N = 118).
Table 11.
Inter-Correlations between valuing being able to engage with the five biophilic values (N = 118).
Table 12.
Engagement with nature indicators as predictors of nature connectedness (N = 118).
Table 13.
Value of engagement nature indicators as predictors of nature connectedness.
Table 14.
Simple mediation of the indirect effects of engaging with humanistic and moralistic indicators on nature connectedness (n = 118; 5000 bootstrap samples).
Table 15.
Simple mediation of the indirect effects of valuing humanistic, naturalistic and moralistic indicators on nature relatedness (n = 118; 5000 bootstrap samples).
Table 16.
Mean age, age range and gender of the three conditions.
Table 17.
Means and standard deviations of the three experimental conditions.
Table 18.
A summative matrix of the identified pathways and their corresponding biophilic values.