Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

A numerical error in the abstract

Posted by yhijikata on 13 Jan 2022 at 20:04 GMT

I am Yasukazu Hijikata, the corresponding author. Unfortunately, a numerical error was discovered after publication. In the Results section of the Abstract, we find that "the adjusted odds ratios for the child to be female were 4.40 (95% confidence interval 1.60-2.48) ". However, as stated in the text, "the adjusted odds ratios for the child to be female were 4.40 (95% confidence interval 1.60-12.1) is correct.

No competing interests declared.