This is an uncorrected proof.
Figures
Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii infection poses a substantial global health burden, yet transmission pathways and population susceptibility in urban informal settlements remain poorly characterised, particularly for women of childbearing age. We analysed archived samples from a cross-sectional serosurvey of 728 children and adolescents aged 4–18 years living in a marginalised urban community in Salvador, Brazil, to characterise exposure patterns and identify demographic, socioeconomic, behavioural, household, and environmental factors associated with seropositivity and to assess spatial heterogeneity in exposure risk. Overall seroprevalence was 49%, increasing with age and higher in males than females; Bayesian serocatalytic models estimated sex-specific forces of infection of 0.078 for males and 0.050 for females, with approximately half of female participants still susceptible upon reaching childbearing age, highlighting the risk of congenital toxoplasmosis. In regression analyses, seropositivity was associated with male sex, lower household income, cat ownership, and residence at lower elevation, greater distance from the main road, and reported contact with sewer water. Notably, most seropositive participants (77.3%) did not live in households with cats. Geostatistical modelling demonstrated fine-scale spatial heterogeneity, with clustered hotspots exceeding 50–60% predicted prevalence. Adjustment for measured covariates attenuated but did not eliminate spatial clustering, indicating residual fine-scale spatial structure consistent with unmeasured environmental processes operating beyond individual households, alongside additional unstructured variation that may reflect household-level or peridomestic differences not captured by the measured covariates. Together, these findings provide evidence consistent with an important role for household and peridomestic environmental exposure pathways in T. gondii transmission in informal settlements, extending beyond households with domestic cats and shaped by social marginalisation and environmental vulnerability.
Author summary
Toxoplasma gondii is a parasite that infects a large proportion of the global population and can cause severe disease when infection occurs during pregnancy. However, little is known about how people are exposed to T. gondii in urban informal settlements, where living conditions may increase contact with environmental sources of infection. We analysed blood samples collected from children and adolescents living in a low-income urban community in Salvador, Brazil, to understand patterns of exposure and identify factors associated with infection. Nearly half of participants showed evidence of past infection, and approximately half of girls remained uninfected upon reaching childbearing age, highlighting ongoing risk of congenital toxoplasmosis. Infection was more common among boys, children from lower-income households, and those reporting contact with sewer water or living in lower-lying areas further from main roads. Notably, most infected children did not live in households with cats, suggesting that infection risk was not confined to homes with domestic cats. Using spatial analyses, we identified clusters of high exposure risk that persisted even after accounting for measured risk factors, indicating that unmeasured environmental processes contribute to exposure beyond individual households. At the same time, additional variation occurred at very small spatial scales, consistent with the influence of household and peridomestic conditions. Together, our findings suggest that exposure to T. gondii in informal urban settlements is shaped by social marginalisation and environmental vulnerability, with contamination within and around households likely driving risk. These findings add to limited evidence on T. gondii exposure pathways in urban informal settlements and may inform efforts to reduce infection risk in similar communities.
Citation: Eyre MT, Wang JY, Carneiro IdO, Reis RB, Wunder EA Jr, Júnior NN, et al. (2026) Social marginalisation, environmental degradation and Toxoplasma gondii exposure in urban informal settlements in Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 20(6): e0014453. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453
Editor: Masoud Foroutan, NHS Blood and Transplant, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
Received: January 16, 2026; Accepted: June 9, 2026; Published: June 22, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Eyre et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All data and R code used to conduct this analysis are available at https://github.com/maxeyre/Toxo-PdL-children. To enable public data sharing while preserving anonymity, age was grouped into three-year bands, household coordinates were removed, and variables with sparse categories were merged.
Funding: This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (grants: NIAID R01 AI052473 to A.I.K, NIAID U01 AI088752 to A.I.K and M.G.R., FIC D43 TW00919 to A.I.K, FIC R25 TW009338 to A.I.K, FIC R01 TW009504 to A.I.K and M.G.R), Brazilian National Research Council (grants: 300861/1996 to M.G.R., 473082/2004 to M.G.R, 420067/2005 to M.G.R., 305723/2006 to M.G.R., 150176/2007 to M.G.R.), a Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute (RGHI) fellowship to M.T.E and a University of Minnesota Global Spotlight Program Award to CMZ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: AIK received honoraria as an expert panel member of the Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute. All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoan with a worldwide distribution [1] and an estimated global average prevalence of 25% [2]. It is an important One Health problem with a substantial global public health burden that is disproportionately concentrated in low-income urban and rural populations [3,4]. A large proportion of this burden arises from congenital toxoplasmosis, for which the global incidence is estimated to be 190,100 cases per year (1.5 per 1000 live births), corresponding to approximately 1.20 million disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) per year [3].
Human infection occurs via oral or congenital routes. Exposure can result from ingestion of environmentally resistant oocysts contaminating soil, food, or water, consumption of tissue cysts (bradyzoites) in raw or undercooked meat from infected animals, or vertical transmission during pregnancy [5]. Oocysts are shed in the faeces of infected felines - the definitive hosts of T. gondii - and can persist in the environment for months to over a year, remaining resistant to freezing, drying, and disinfectants [6,7]. As a result, environmental contamination can constitute a sustained source of infection for humans and animals, particularly in mixed-environment settings with limited hygiene infrastructure and close human–animal contact.
The public health importance of toxoplasmosis is driven primarily by its impact on pregnant women, their offspring, and immunocompromised individuals. While infection in immunocompetent hosts is often asymptomatic or mild [8], primary infection during pregnancy can result in congenital toxoplasmosis, leading to miscarriage, hydrocephalus, central nervous system abnormalities, and chorioretinitis [9,10]. Disease severity is inversely related to gestational age at infection, with first- and second-trimester infections more likely to cause severe outcomes [9,10]. Ocular toxoplasmosis, a leading cause of chorioretinitis globally, may present years after either congenital or postnatal infection [9,11]. Women of childbearing age are therefore a critical population for prevention efforts. In immunocompromised individuals, toxoplasmosis may cause life-threatening complications such as encephalitis and pneumonitis [12]. Emerging evidence also suggests potential links between latent infection and neuropsychiatric disorders, indicating a broader disease burden than previously recognised [13].
Brazil has one of the highest burdens of T. gondii infection globally. Seroprevalence estimates suggest exposure in up to 50% of school-aged children and 50–80% of women of childbearing age, with congenital infection rates estimated at 5–23 per 10,000 births [14]. Brazil has also experienced a disproportionately high number of documented toxoplasmosis outbreaks over the past five decades [15]. This elevated transmission is thought to reflect a convergence of socio-environmental factors common in low-income populations, including contaminated food and water, inadequate sanitation, poor hygiene, free-roaming domestic cats, and the circulation of atypical and more virulent T. gondii genotypes [4,15,16]. These genotypes, which are uncommon in Europe, have been associated with more severe clinical outcomes among congenitally infected children in Brazil [4,17].
Urban informal settlements in Brazil, and globally, are likely to be settings of heightened vulnerability to T. gondii infection [18–22], with women of childbearing age in these communities at particular risk. Rapid and uneven urbanisation in Brazil has led to the expansion of informal settlements over recent decades, a trend mirrored worldwide with the global population living in informal settlements projected to reach three billion by 2030 [23]. Despite the size and vulnerability of this population, the epidemiology of T. gondii in informal urban settings remains poorly characterised. Previous studies have found that socioeconomic vulnerability is associated with exposure [19], but little is known about the mechanisms by which social marginalisation drives risk within informal settlements.
There are consequently two important research priorities for T. gondii in marginalised urban populations [4,17]. First, robust estimates of seroprevalence in children and women reaching reproductive age, together with age- and sex-specific transmission rates, are needed to identify populations at risk of primary infection during pregnancy and to understand how transmission dynamics vary across demographic groups and settings. Second, detailed characterisation of exposure risk is required to clarify the social and environmental pathways through which transmission occurs, including whether infection is primarily associated with households that own cats, or instead reflects shared peridomestic and environmental exposures extending beyond individual households, or food-borne exposure through contaminated meat. Characterising transmission at the human–animal–environment interface is therefore critical for informing effective, community-based prevention strategies.
In this study, we analysed archived samples from a cross-sectional serosurvey conducted in 2003 among children and adolescents aged 4–18 years living in an urban low-income community in Brazil. These data provide a valuable opportunity to address the research priorities outlined above, combining serological outcomes with detailed demographic, behavioural, and environmental information for a highly exposure-informative age group. Given the paucity in available evidence, historical datasets from these settings are valuable for establishing transmission benchmarks, contextualising contemporary findings, and identifying exposure pathways that may remain relevant in present-day informal settlements with similar social and environmental conditions. The aims of this study were: 1) describe trends in T. gondii seroprevalence within the study population and estimate sex-specific force of infection; 2) identify demographic, socioeconomic, behavioural, household, and environmental factors associated with seropositivity; and 3) characterise fine-scale spatial heterogeneity in exposure risk and assess the relative contributions of household-level and environmental processes.
Methods
Ethics statement
Participants were enrolled according to written informed consent. For participants under 18 years of age, written informed consent was obtained from a parent or legal guardian. The collection and testing of samples for T. gondii was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Centro de Pesquisas Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (CEP-CPqGM/FIOCRUZ), under the authority of the Brazilian National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP), in accordance with Resolution 196/96 of the National Health Council (protocols no. 89, approval no. 06/2002).
Study site and population
This study was conducted in Pau da Lima, a marginalised urban community located on the periphery of the city of Salvador, Northeast Brazil. The study site consisted of four distinct valleys with a total area of 0.46 km2, which are characterised by large elevation gradients, high population density, inadequate sanitation and drainage infrastructure, and a mixed peri-urban environment of soil, vegetation and paved surfaces.
The study population was initially recruited for a seroprevalence study of leptospirosis in 2003, with results published previously [24]. In this study we re-analysed previously collected serum samples for a subset of participants aged 4–18 years to measure seroprevalence for T. gondii-specific antibodies. The study population was recruited as follows (see S1 Fig). In 2003, a preliminary census was conducted for the study area, identifying 14,122 inhabitants living in 3,689 households, of which 12,651 were eligible to participate in the study. The eligibility criteria were: residing for at least three nights in the previous week in a household within the study area; being aged four years or older; and providing written informed consent for participation in the study. Households containing eligible subjects were assigned sequential numbers, and a computer-based random generator was used to select a subset of 861 households consisting of 2,003 eligible residents who were invited to participate in the study between April 2003 and May 2004. From these households, 749 participants aged 4–18 years were successfully recruited. The sample size was further reduced to 728 subjects because serum samples were not available for all participants.
Data collection
Household survey.
A team of community healthcare workers, nurses, and physicians administered a standardised questionnaire during home visits to collect participant data on demographic and socioeconomic status (SES) indicators and self-reported environmental exposures. Participants self-reported their race. Household income and ownership were determined through interviews with the household head. The study team surveyed the household area to determine the presence of dogs, cats, and chickens, and vegetation in the peridomestic area. Household locations were georeferenced during the original field survey using handheld GPS units.
Mapped environmental variables.
To create additional environmental variables, household coordinates were collected during study site house visits and the study team mapped sites with large trash dumps, the open sewer network and main roads. The shortest distance from each household to each of these three environmental features was calculated for use as an explanatory variable. The variable ‘distance to main road’ is a known proxy for social and environmental marginalisation in these communities due to the concentration of poverty, limited infrastructure, and reduced access to public services in areas further from main roads [24]. Household elevation was also extracted for each household from a 5m resolution digital elevation model provided by the Salvador municipal government, with lower elevation in the valleys a proxy for flooding risk, a more mixed and less paved environment (including exposed soil), which are characteristic of environmentally degraded areas and may increase environmental exposure [25].
Serological analysis.
Serum samples were obtained from the blood collected from the subjects during home visits. The T. gondii IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA) was used to evaluate serological evidence of prior infection. Samples that produced equivocal results were retested to determine whether a seropositive or seronegative outcome was obtained. If the sample remained undetermined, it was classified as seronegative.
Grouping of explanatory variables by domain.
Explanatory variables were grouped into four domains - demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, household animals, household and peridomestic environment, and contact with the environment - to reflect both potential sources of T. gondii oocysts and the settings in which exposure may occur (see S1 Table for full definitions and rationale). This framework was used to assess social and environmental drivers of exposure, and whether exposure was more consistent with household-based pathways or with environmental and peridomestic exposure pathways operating beyond individual households.
Statistical analysis
Age- and sex-specific seroprevalence and force of infection.
To characterise exposure to T. gondii across childhood, we estimated age- and sex-specific seroprevalence by calculating the proportion of participants with T. gondii IgG antibodies across five age groups (4–6, 7–9, 10–12, 13–15, and 16–18 years), stratified by sex. Confidence intervals were calculated using exact binomial methods.
We then fitted a serocatalytic model [26] to estimate the annual force of infection (FOI), defined as the per-capita rate at which susceptible individuals become infected, and the corresponding annual infection probability (AIP), representing the proportion of susceptible individuals expected to be infected each year, in male and female participants. The catalytic model assumes that susceptible individuals are infected at a constant FOI, λ, across their lifetime (i.e., independent of age (a) and calendar year) and that once they have been infected, they recover and remain immune and seropositive. The proportion seropositive at age a, z(a), is given by
The corresponding mean AIP is then calculated as follows:
To estimate sex-specific FOI and AIP, we used Bayesian inference to fit this serocatalytic model to empirical data on male and female participants separately following the methodology previously described by Rees et al. [27]. A uniform distribution between 0 and 0.5 was used as an uninformative prior for FOI. Model parameters were estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) with the Gibbs sampling algorithm, implemented in RJags (version 4–10) [28]. We used the Gelman-Rubin statistic to evaluate MCMC convergence considering a threshold of <1.1 [29]. The predicted relationship between seroprevalence and age and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were plotted for each sex.
As a sensitivity analysis we assessed whether exposure was age-dependent and changed after reaching adolescence for female participants, we fitted a piecewise serocatalytic model that allowed the force of infection to differ before and after age 12.
Factors associated with seropositivity.
We calculated descriptive statistics and seroprevalence for variables across the four domains (demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, household animals, household and peridomestic environment, and contact with the environment). Univariable logistic mixed-effects regression models with a random intercept at the household level were used to estimate the crude associations between each variable and the odds of T. gondii seropositivity. All continuous explanatory variables were initially assessed for non-linearity with the log-odds of seropositivity using generalized additive models (GAMs) [30]; where no strong departures from linearity were observed, variables were modelled linearly (S2 Fig).
Multivariable regression analyses were guided by a causal framework to examine the relationship between exposures within each domain and T. gondii seropositivity. Assumed relationships between variables were formalised using a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) constructed in Dagitty [31]; a simplified version is shown in Fig 1, with the full DAG provided in S3 Fig and available online (https://dagitty.net/m5z6UTbAP). All causal language used herein follows the principles outlined by Tennant et al. [32]. We assumed that demographic and socioeconomic characteristics (age, sex, race, household income, and house ownership) may influence serostatus both directly and indirectly. Race and socioeconomic characteristics were treated as upstream structural determinants that shape where a child lives and, in turn, influence animal ownership and conditions in the household and peridomestic environment, as well as opportunities for contact with the environment near the household. In contrast, child age and sex were not assumed to influence environmental conditions but may affect exposure through behavioural pathways captured within the contact-with-environment domain. Conditions in the household and peridomestic environment were assumed to influence children’s likelihood of contact with potentially contaminated environments near the home. Finally, the household animals, household and peridomestic environment, and contact with the environment domains were assumed to affect serostatus directly through increased opportunities for exposure to T. gondii oocysts.
Variables are shown grouped by their domains with arrows between domain boxes representing the relationship between all variables within those domains. Within domain relationships are not shown except for race and socioeconomic status (SES). A single SES indicator, per-capita household income, was used for this analysis.
Multivariable logistic regression models with a random intercept at the household level were used to estimate the total effect of each exposure on seropositivity, as defined by the assumed causal structure in the DAG, adjusting for the sufficient adjustment sets identified in the DAG [31,32]. Collinearity among variables was assessed using Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Variables with VIF values exceeding 5 were considered to exhibit potentially problematic multicollinearity, but this was not exceeded for any variables. While our cross-sectional design precludes causal claims, the use of DAGs enables transparent specification of the estimand and principled identification of adjustment sets to minimise confounding. Our estimates should be interpreted as associations corresponding to the total effect under the assumed causal structure, contingent on the assumptions specified in the DAG.
E-values were calculated for estimated odds ratios to assess the minimum strength of association that an unmeasured confounder would need to have with both the exposure and seropositivity, conditional on measured covariates, to fully explain away the observed associations [33]. To aid interpretation of odds ratios, we estimated model-based marginal predicted seroprevalence for selected key binary exposures by averaging predicted probabilities from the fitted mixed-effects models over the observed distribution of covariates.
Spatial modelling of heterogeneity in seroprevalence.
We examined spatial heterogeneity in T. gondii seroprevalence using geostatistical binomial models implemented in the PrevMap package in R [34]. Full details of the geostatistical modelling framework, including the model specification, likelihood estimation by Monte Carlo maximum likelihood, and the prediction procedure, are provided in S1 Appendix.
Individual serostatus was modelled as a Bernoulli outcome with a logit link (Eq. (1)), where denotes the probability that individual
residing at household location
was seropositive. The linear predictor included fixed effects for measured covariates, comprising location-specific covariates
with regression coefficients
, and individual-level covariates
with regression coefficients
a spatially correlated Gaussian process
, and an unstructured random effect
. The spatial process
was assumed to have mean zero and variance
, capturing residual spatial variation in seroprevalence not explained by measured covariates, with spatial correlation governed by a range parameter
that determines the rate at which correlation decays with distance. The term
was assumed to have variance
and captures unstructured variation arising from a combination of spatial processes operating at scales below the sampling resolution and within-household extra-binomial variability, collectively represented by the nugget effect.
First, an intercept-only geostatistical model was fitted to characterise the overall spatial distribution of seroprevalence. Seroprevalence was predicted on a 4 m × 4 m grid across the study area. From posterior samples of predicted prevalence, we derived (i) the posterior mean predicted prevalence at each location and (ii) the posterior probability that prevalence exceeded 50% (exceedance probability).
We then fitted a full geostatistical model including covariates to examine residual spatial variability not captured by measured risk factors. Variable selection for this prediction model proceeded as follows: only variables associated at the 5% significance level in the multivariable regression analysis were considered. Logistic mixed-effects regression models were fitted for all possible combinations of these variables, and the model with the lowest Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) [35] value was selected. The selected variables were included in the geostatistical model, and the posterior mean of the residual spatial process was predicted across the study area to visualise spatial clustering in risk not explained by measured covariates. The proportion of residual variation that was spatially structured was quantified as
where
represents the variance of the spatially structured Gaussian process and
represents unstructured variation arising from processes operating at spatial scales finer than the sampling resolution, including within-household or immediate peridomestic heterogeneity not captured by the spatial process.
Data and code availability
All data and R code used to conduct this analysis are available at https://github.com/maxeyre/Toxo-PdL-children. To enable public data sharing while preserving anonymity, age was grouped into three-year bands, household coordinates were removed, and variables with sparse categories were merged.
Results
Description of the study population
The study population (Table 1) was 49.3% male with an even distribution of participants across age groups: 4–6 years (15.2%), 7–9 years (22.3%), 10–12 years (19.6%), 13–15 years (19.2%) and 16–18 years (23.6%). Most participants self-identified as Pardo (mixed race; 62.5%), followed by Black (32.4%) and White (4.8%). A majority (87.6%) of participants lived in households for which their family did not own the title to their home. The median daily household per-capita income was US$0.61. Household elevation varied considerably, between 25m and 79m, a result of the steep inclines within the study areas.
A total of 133 (18.3%) participants lived in households that owned cats. The majority of participants (n = 562, 77.2%) had observed rats near to their household. Contact with potential environmental sources of exposure was common, with 47.3% and 27.7% of participants reporting recent contact with flood water and sewer water, respectively, near the house. In this setting, contact with sewer water occurs through exposure to the open sewer channels running through the community, which residents may encounter when moving around the neighbourhood.
Age- and sex-specific seroprevalence and force of infection
Among 728 study participants, we identified serological evidence of previous exposure to T. gondii in 357 individuals and a crude seroprevalence of 49.0%. Seroprevalence increased with age, from 23.4% in individuals aged 4–6 years to 63.9% in the oldest group aged 16–18 years (Table 1). Seroprevalence was higher in male than in female participants (55.7% and 42.5%, respectively), and this sex disparity was observed in all age groups (Fig 2). For both males and females, seroprevalence was similar in the 13–15 and 16–18 age groups.
Bars represent 95% confidence intervals; B-C) Serocatalytic model estimates of age-specific seroprevalence for B) male and C) female participants with 95% credible intervals (dark shading) and binomial sampling uncertainty (light shading). The estimated annual force of infection (FOI) and corresponding annual infection probability (AIP) are included on each panel. The proportion of seropositive individuals is plotted for each 3-year age group (black points) with bars representing 95% confidence intervals.
Sex-specific serocatalytic models estimated the annual force of infection (FOI) to be 0.078 (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.067, 0.090) and 0.050 (95% CrI 0.042, 0.059) for male and female participants, respectively. These FOIs were equivalent to annual infection probabilities (AIPs) of 7.52% (95% CrI 6.52%, 8.62%) in male participants and 4.87% (95% CrI 4.16%, 5.68%) in female participants.
Model predictions are shown for males and females in Fig 2B and 2C, respectively, and suggest that approximately 40% of female participants remained unexposed by age 18 years. The sensitivity analysis using a piecewise FOI model supported the constant-FOI assumption, with no evidence of reduced exposure after age 12. In this model, the estimated FOI was 0.049 before age 12 (95% CrI 0.039, 0.060) and 0.053 after age 12 (95% CrI 0.008, 0.109), with a posterior probability of 0.46 that the post-12 FOI was lower than the pre-12 FOI. Together, these findings suggest that many girls remain susceptible as they enter reproductive age while continuing to live in a high-transmission environment, with potential implications for the risk of primary infection during pregnancy.
Factors associated with seropositivity
Seropositivity appeared to cluster within some households, with 22.8% of households having two or more seropositive children, while 42.1% had none and 35.1% had one. Mean household seroprevalence, calculated as the number of seropositive participants in the household divided by the total number of participants in the household, was 44.8% across all study households and 77.5% in study households with at least one seropositive individual. Fig 3 shows the distribution of T. gondii serostatus across the three valleys.
Locations were randomly displaced to preserve anonymity. The inset shows the location of Salvador in Northeast Brazil. Source: Salvador/CONDER cartographic base map obtained from Geopolis, Infraestrutura de Dados Espaciais da Bahia (IDE Bahia), Governo do Estado da Bahia using CONDER/INFORMS open cartographic data available under the Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) [43]; state limits for inset image from publicly available IBGE Malhas Territoriais, 2017 [44].
Higher seroprevalence was observed among participants who identified as Black or Pardo (mixed race) and among those living in households with lower per-capita income, cats, chickens, or reported rat sightings.
Estimates of the total effect of each exposure on seropositivity from the multivariable regression models, as defined by the assumed DAG, are shown in Fig 4 (see S2 Table for full set of model estimates).
Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals are provided in S2 Table.
Several demographic and socioeconomic variables were associated with seropositivity. Seropositivity increased with age, plateauing between the 13–15 and 16–18-year age groups (see Fig 4 and S2 Table). Male participants had more than twice the odds of seropositivity compared with female participants (OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.59, 3.81). Associations with race were imprecisely estimated and confidence intervals crossed the null, although point estimates suggested lower odds among White children and higher odds among Black children compared with Pardo children.
Indicators of social marginalisation were associated with seropositivity. Each US$1 increase in per-capita household income was associated with lower odds of seropositivity (OR 0.54; 95%CI 0.38, 0.78). Similarly, the odds of seropositivity increased by 16% (OR 1.16; 95%CI 1.04, 1.30) for every additional 50 metres of distance from the main road. Households located further from main roads are situated in areas characterised by greater poverty, limited infrastructure, mixed environmental conditions (including soil and open waterways), and reduced access to public services.
The seroprevalence among households with a cat (60.9%; 81/133) was higher than those without a cat (46.4%; 276/595) and participants living in households with a cat had higher odds of seropositivity (OR 1.93; 95%CI 1.08, 3.44). However, the majority of seropositive individuals (77.3%) did not live in households with a cat.
Household and peridomestic environmental characteristics, and reported contact with the environment were also associated with seropositivity. Living at higher household elevation, a proxy for decreased flooding risk and less environmentally degraded areas, was associated with lower odds of seropositivity, with each 10m increase in elevation corresponding to an OR of 0.66 (95%CI 0.55, 0.80). Participants reporting contact with sewer water near the household in the previous six months had 2.54 (95% CI 1.50, 4.33) times the odds of seropositivity compared with those reporting no such contact.
Model-based marginal predictions suggested higher seroprevalence among participants living in households with cats compared with those without cats (58.8% vs 45.8%), and among those reporting contact with sewer water compared with those reporting no contact (61.0% vs 43.9%), consistent with elevated exposure risk but indicating substantial risk beyond these specific exposures.
E-values for selected statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) ranged from 1.37 to 6.66 (S3 Table), indicating that an unmeasured confounder would need to be moderately to strongly associated with both the exposure and seropositivity (independently of measured covariates) to fully explain away these observed associations.
Spatial modelling of heterogeneity in seroprevalence
The intercept-only geostatistical model revealed substantial spatial heterogeneity in T. gondii prevalence across Pau da Lima, with areas of elevated predicted prevalence exceeding 60% (Fig 5A). Lower prevalence was predicted in the southernmost sections of the three valleys, in areas close to the main road. Exceedance probabilities (Fig 5B) indicated a high probability (>0.9) that seroprevalence exceeded 50% in several contiguous hotspots, especially in the central and northern sections of each valley.
A) Posterior mean prevalence predicted from the intercept-only model. B) Posterior exceedance probability that prevalence exceeds 50% from the intercept-only model, highlighting areas with a high probability of elevated prevalence. C) Posterior mean of the residual spatial random effect from the full model which included covariates from all four domains. The boundary outline was created by the authors for this study and does not contain copyrighted third-party material.
The full geostatistical model included selected covariates (age, sex, household income, elevation, distance to road, cat ownership, and sewer water contact; see S4 Table for the AIC of the top five models) and attenuated, but did not eliminate, spatial clustering. The estimated spatial covariance parameters indicated residual short-range spatial structure in seroprevalence. The spatial correlation parameter, , decreased from 58.72m (95%CI 24.68, 139.71) in the intercept-only model to 29.95m (95%CI 15.48, 57.95) in the full model (see S5 and S6 Tables), corresponding to a spatial correlation range of approximately 90m (defined as the distance at which correlation declines to 5%) in the full model. This residual spatial structure was evident in the posterior mean of the spatial random effect
(Fig 5C), which represents spatial variation in seroprevalence not explained by the measured covariates. Compared with the intercept-only model, the residual surface had fewer and smaller areas of elevated risk, but spatial heterogeneity persisted. These remaining areas of elevated risk are consistent with the influence of unmeasured environmental processes that vary over relatively short distances.
The distribution of residual variance further supported this interpretation. The nugget variance ( = 1.48; 95%CI 0.62, 3.55) exceeded the spatially structured variance (
= 0.66; 95%CI 0.37, 1.18), indicating that approximately 31% of the residual variation was spatially structured, while the remaining 69% was attributable to unstructured variation captured by the nugget effect. This unstructured component represents heterogeneity operating at very fine spatial scales, consistent with household-level or immediate peridomestic processes not captured by the measured covariates. Taken together, these results indicate that residual heterogeneity in seroprevalence reflects contributions from both spatially structured processes operating over short distances and unstructured variation at very fine spatial scales.
Discussion
In this study, we analysed trends in T. gondii seroprevalence among children and adolescents living in a low-income urban community and found evidence of substantial exposure, with nearly half of participants showing serological evidence of prior infection and moderate estimated annual forces of infection. Male sex, lower household income, cat ownership, residence further from the main road or at lower elevations, and reported contact with sewer water were all associated with seropositivity. Notably, however, most seropositive participants did not live in households with cats. Geostatistical analyses revealed marked spatial heterogeneity in seroprevalence over small spatial scales, with clustered hotspots exceeding 60% predicted prevalence. Adjustment for measured individual, household, and environmental factors attenuated but did not eliminate spatial clustering, indicating the presence of unmeasured environmental processes operating beyond individual households. Together, these findings suggest that T. gondii exposure represents a substantial health risk in marginalised urban communities and are consistent with an important role for social marginalisation and environmental degradation in shaping transmission through environmental and peridomestic exposure pathways.
Our findings suggest a significant risk of congenital toxoplasmosis in urban informal settlements with similar demographic and environmental features to those of our study site. Almost half of female participants remained unexposed upon reaching childbearing age, indicating a substantial susceptible population entering reproductive age. This risk is compounded by the relatively high force of infection, with an estimated 5% of susceptible females in our study population becoming infected annually. A sensitivity analysis found no evidence that the force of infection differed between ages 4–12 and 13–18 years, supporting the interpretation that exposure continues through adolescence and may be independent of age-specific behaviours. Primary infection during pregnancy can result in severe congenital disease, including long-term impairments in vision, behaviour, and cognitive function [9,10], highlighting the public health importance of understanding exposure pathways in these settings. However, because our data were restricted to children and adolescents, the estimated force of infection may not generalise to adult women of childbearing age, whose exposure patterns may differ due to behavioural changes, domestic roles, mobility, pregnancy-related factors, or depletion of the most highly exposed subgroups. More generally, the high exposure rates observed across childhood are also concerning given growing evidence linking latent infection to neuropsychiatric and behavioural outcomes [13].
Several findings were consistent with T. gondii exposure occurring through environmental pathways operating both within and beyond the household environment. Household cat ownership was associated with seropositivity, suggesting that intradomiciliary contamination from domestic cats may contribute to exposure in some cases. However, given that 77.3% of seropositive participants did not reside in households with cats, cat ownership alone cannot account for the observed burden of infection. Model-based marginal predictions indicated higher seroprevalence among participants living in households with cats compared with those without (approximately 59% versus 45%) but also demonstrated substantial exposure among children without direct household cat contact. These findings suggest that while domestic hygiene may be relevant in some households, exposure frequently occurs through broader contact with contaminated environments rather than through direct interaction with cats alone. This is consistent with observations in the study area that some cats are kept indoors, while others roam freely and defecate in the community. This interpretation is supported by associations with environmental characteristics indicative of wider exposure opportunities, including residence at lower elevations – where severe flooding is common [25] - and reported contact with sewer water; these factors likely increase contact with oocyst-contaminated soil or water in and around the household, particularly in environmentally degraded areas with poor drainage and sanitation infrastructure. Further evidence for environmental transmission is provided by a recent study of T. gondii exposure among animals in the same study area, which reported seroprevalence of 22.3% in cats and 66.7% in chickens. Chickens are infected almost exclusively by ingesting environmental oocysts while foraging and pecking at soil, so they can act as sentinels for local oocyst contamination. Their high seroprevalence therefore supports the hypothesis that transmission in this setting occurs through oocysts dispersed in the environment [18].
Spatial modelling provided further support for the role of environmentally mediated exposure beyond individual households. T. gondii seroprevalence exhibited clear clustering at sub-neighbourhood scales, and although adjustment for measured individual-, household-, and environmental-level covariates attenuated spatial clustering, residual spatial dependence persisted. This spatial pattern is more consistent with exposure to environmentally distributed oocysts than with food-borne exposure via tissue cysts, which would not be expected to show spatial structure at these spatial scales. The estimated spatial correlation range of approximately 90m indicated that shared exposure processes operate over distances extending beyond single households. This is consistent with an individual’s infection risk being affected by local environmental contamination caused by hydrology, sanitation, landscape features and the presence of cats in the area surrounding their household. The 90m range plausibly corresponds to the scale of local drainage catchments and possibly the home range of domestic cats in the area. At the same time, a substantial proportion of unexplained variation was unstructured, suggesting additional heterogeneity at the household or immediate peridomestic level. Together, these spatial patterns indicate that T. gondii exposure in this setting likely reflects a combination of shared environmental processes operating across small areas and household-level or peridomestic factors, including unmeasured behaviours and micro-environmental conditions that were not captured by available data.
The peridomestic environment in informal settlements can act as a persistent environmental reservoir that supports the survival of T. gondii oocysts, increasing residents’ exposure to contaminated soil and water. In Pau da Lima, the steep valley topography and open sewerage systems concentrate floodwater, sediment, and waste in low-lying areas, making household elevation and sewer contact effective proxies for hydrological processes that facilitate oocyst persistence and transport [45]. These conditions may promote spillover from households with cats to the surrounding environment, amplifying exposure risk beyond individual households. Similar hydrology-driven dispersal mechanisms have been documented for other environmentally persistent pathogens in this community, including Leptospira [25,46,47], and are supported by studies in Chile, France, and Brazil linking flooding, soil contamination, and environmental exposure to T. gondii seropositivity and congenital toxoplasmosis [21,22,48–50].
Addressing these environmental deficiencies through improved sanitation, drainage, and flood mitigation infrastructure may consequently be important for limiting environmental contamination and reducing exposure risk. As climate change is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of flooding events in tropical urban settings, understanding how hydrology, hygiene, and environmental reservoirs interact may be increasingly critical for preventing toxoplasmosis in climate-vulnerable informal settlements.
Social marginalisation appeared to play an important role in shaping exposure risk within the study community. Increased risk of seropositivity was associated with living in households with lower per-capita income, at lower elevations, and further from the main road. These areas are characterised by poorer infrastructure and reduced access to services. In the steep valleys common to informal settlements in urban Brazil, distance from main roads reflects both physical and social marginalisation. Although associations between socioeconomic vulnerability and T. gondii exposure have been reported previously [21,51–54], it is notable that substantial risk gradients were observed over small spatial distances within a low-income community. Socioeconomic constraints may limit where families can reside, confining them to environments with frequent contact with contaminated soil and water, high densities of intermediate rodent hosts, and limited infrastructure to support effective hygiene practices [51]. Race may also be relevant to T. gondii exposure in this setting, although adjusted associations were imprecise. Larger studies should examine whether race shapes infection risk through structural differences in household, socioeconomic, and environmental conditions.
The association between male sex and increased T. gondii exposure risk has not been widely reported in other studies globally. In Pau da Lima, males have been shown to experience higher risk of leptospirosis, likely reflecting differences in mobility patterns, risk perception, and protective behaviours [55,56]. Although such gender differences are more commonly documented in adults, our findings suggest that similar behavioural factors may also influence exposure among children and adolescents, particularly through differential contact with contaminated environments and hygiene practices. These behaviours are likely to vary more by sex than dietary habits, which may help explain the observed sex difference in seroprevalence [51].
This study contributes to a limited body of research on T. gondii exposure in urban informal settlements, particularly among children and adolescents. Although the data were collected in 2003, the social, environmental and infrastructural conditions characterising the study community continue to be prevalent across informal settlements in Salvador and globally. The findings are therefore likely to be relevant to other marginalised urban contexts with similar social, environmental and sanitary conditions. This is supported by seroprevalence estimates from comparable communities internationally, which are similar to those observed in this study [22,52,54,57,58]. Together, these findings provide a valuable reference point for understanding contemporary transmission dynamics and for contextualising more recent studies conducted in comparable environments.
Several limitations should be considered. The cross-sectional design and use of seropositivity (i.e., as a marker of historical exposure) as an outcome may introduce temporality bias, as exposure may have occurred prior to measurement of some explanatory variables or at previous residences. Some variables were self-reported or proxied, and residual confounding - such as dietary exposures or other unmeasured behaviours - may remain. We did not directly measure environmental contamination with oocysts and instead relied on environmental and behavioural proxies to infer transmission pathways.
Household geolocation error may have introduced exposure misclassification for distance-based environmental covariates, such as distance to sewer, where assigned values may be sensitive to small positional errors. As any such error is unlikely to be associated with seropositivity, it would likely be non-differential and bias associations towards the null, although it may have contributed to the nugget effect in the geostatistical model. The serocatalytic model also assumed a constant force of infection over calendar time. As Pau da Lima underwent urbanisation and infrastructure change before the 2003 survey, age associations may partly reflect historical living conditions rather than only the environment measured at sampling. Consequently, further longitudinal research, particularly among women of childbearing age, is needed to characterise current age-specific exposure dynamics and quantify the risk of primary infection during pregnancy in high-risk urban populations.
This study underscores the neglected status of toxoplasmosis in urban informal settings and highlights the need for research and public health strategies that explicitly address environmental transmission pathways. The high force of infection observed alongside a substantial proportion of women remaining susceptible into reproductive age indicates a persistent risk of primary infection during pregnancy, underscoring the importance of improved surveillance and prevention strategies for congenital toxoplasmosis in these settings.
Our findings suggest that interventions limited to households with domestic cats are unlikely to be sufficient. Identified associations with indicators of environmental exposure, and fine-scale spatial clustering point to the need for broader approaches that reduce environmental contamination beyond an individual household (e.g., improved sanitation, drainage, and flood mitigation). At the household and peridomestic level, measures that reduce contact with contaminated sewer and flood water, alongside improved hygiene practices and waste management may help reduce exposure. Future work would benefit from a One Health framework that integrates human, animal, and environmental data to better delineate transmission routes and identify intervention points. Effective prevention in these settings will require strategies that address social marginalisation and environmental degradation at both household and community levels, rather than focusing solely on individual behaviours or domestic animal ownership [59].
Supporting information
S1 Fig. STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) flowchart showing the recruitment of study participants.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Table. Domains, variables, and rationale for explanatory variables used in the analysis.
Variables were grouped into four domains that capture both the potential sources of T. gondii oocysts and the places where people are likely exposed to them.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s002
(DOCX)
S2 Fig. Generalized Additive Model (GAM) partial dependence plots for the exploratory analysis to identify the functional form of continuous explanatory variables against the log-odds of seropositivity for: A. age; B. distance to the main road; C. distance to nearest trash dump; D. distance to nearest waste sewer; E. household elevation in meters; F. per-capita household income.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s003
(DOCX)
S3 Fig. Full Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) for T. gondii serostatus in children and adolescents with direction of causality indicated by arrows (available online at https://dagitty.net/m5z6UTbAP).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s004
(DOCX)
S1 Appendix. Geostatistical modelling framework.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s005
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Multivariable regression estimates of the total effect of each exposure on T. gondii seropositivity, informed by causal diagrams and grouped by exposure domains (as outlined in S1 Table).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s006
(DOCX)
S3 Table. E-values for selected multivariable associations between exposures and T. gondii seropositivity.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s007
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Model selection for the spatial analysis: Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression selection table ordered by corrected Akaike Information Criteria (AICc) with the degrees of freedom (df) and difference in AICc relative to the top ranked model (delta).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s008
(DOCX)
S5 Table. Intercept-only geostatistical model parameter estimates.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s009
(DOCX)
S6 Table. Full geostatistical model parameter estimates.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014453.s010
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank the team members of the Urban Health Council of Pau da Lima and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, all field teams who participated in the data collection for this study. Finally, this work could not be accomplished without the joint collaborative effort of the resident associations, community leaders and residents.
References
- 1. Dubey JP. The history of Toxoplasma gondii--the first 100 years. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2008;55(6):467–75. pmid:19120791
- 2. Molan A, Nosaka K, Hunter M, Wang W. Global status of Toxoplasma gondii infection: systematic review and prevalence snapshots. Trop Biomed. 2019;36(4):898–925. pmid:33597463
- 3. Torgerson PR, Mastroiacovo P. The global burden of congenital toxoplasmosis: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(7):501–8. pmid:23825877
- 4. Dubey JP, Lago EG, Gennari SM, Su C, Jones JL. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology. 2012;139(11):1375–424. pmid:22776427
- 5. Saadatnia G, Golkar M. A review on human toxoplasmosis. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012;44(11):805–14. pmid:22831461
- 6. Hughes JM, Colley DG, Lopez A, Dietz VJ, Wilson M, Navin TR, et al. Preventing congenital toxoplasmosis. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2000;49(RR-2):57–75. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42000708
- 7. Shapiro K, Bahia-Oliveira L, Dixon B, Dumètre A, de Wit LA, VanWormer E. Environmental transmission of Toxoplasma gondii: Oocysts in water, soil and food. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019. pmid:32095620
- 8. Hill D, Dubey JP. Toxoplasma gondii: transmission, diagnosis and prevention. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8(10):634–40. pmid:12390281
- 9. McAuley JB. Congenital toxoplasmosis. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2014;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S30-5. pmid:25232475
- 10.
Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O. Toxoplasmosis. In: Lancet. Elsevier B.V.; 2004. p. 1965–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X pmid:15194258
- 11. Weiss LM, Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis: a history of clinical observations. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39(8):895–901. pmid:19217908
- 12. Opsteegh M, Kortbeek TM, Havelaar AH, van der Giessen JWB. Intervention strategies to reduce human Toxoplasma gondii disease burden. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;60(1):101–7.
- 13. Milne G, Webster JP, Walker M. Toxoplasma gondii: an underestimated threat? Trends Parasitol. 2020:959–69. pmid:33012669
- 14. Dubey JP, Lago EG, Gennari SM, Su C, Jones JL. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology. 2012:1375–424.
- 15. Dubey JP. Outbreaks of clinical toxoplasmosis in humans: five decades of personal experience, perspectives and lessons learned. Parasit Vectors. 2021. pmid:34011387
- 16. Cabral Monica T, Evers F, de Souza Lima Nino B, Pinto-Ferreira F, Breganó JW, Ragassi Urbano M, et al. Socioeconomic factors associated with infection by Toxoplasma gondii and Toxocara canis in children. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69(3):1589–95. pmid:33908184
- 17. Dubey JP, Murata FHA, Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Kwok OCH, Villena I. Congenital toxoplasmosis in humans: an update of worldwide rate of congenital infections. Parasitology. 2021;148(12):1406–16. pmid:34254575
- 18. Bazan L, Argibay HD, Borges-Silva W, Pita Gondim LF, Dos Santos Mattos TA, Santana JO, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild, domestic and companion animals in urban informal settlements from Salvador, Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025;19(12):e0013303. pmid:41401226
- 19. Mareze M, Benitez A do N, Brandão APD, Pinto-Ferreira F, Miura AC, Martins FDC, et al. Socioeconomic vulnerability associated to Toxoplasma gondii exposure in southern Brazil. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212375. pmid:30763391
- 20. Francisco FDM, de Souza SLP, Gennari SM, Pinheiro SR, Muradian V, Soares RM. Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in a low-income community in the São Paulo municipality, SP, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2006;48(3):167–70. pmid:16847507
- 21. Carellos EVM, de Andrade GMQ, Vasconcelos-Santos DV, Januário JN, Romanelli RMC, Abreu MNS, et al. Adverse socioeconomic conditions and oocyst-related factors are associated with congenital toxoplasmosis in a population-based study in Minas Gerais, Brazil. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88588. pmid:24523920
- 22. Munoz-Zanzi C, Campbell C, Berg S. Seroepidemiology of toxoplasmosis in rural and urban communities from Los Rios Region, Chile. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2016;6:30597. pmid:26968154
- 23.
Habitat UN. Tracking progress towards inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable cities and human settlements. SDG 11 Synthesis Report-High Level Political Forum 2018; 2018.
- 24. Reis RB, Ribeiro GS, Felzemburgh RDM, Santana FS, Mohr S, Melendez AXTO. Impact of environment and social gradient on Leptospira infection in urban slums. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(4). pmid:18431445
- 25. Eyre MT, Souza FN, Carvalho-Pereira TS, Nery N, de Oliveira D, Cruz JS. Linking rattiness, geography and environmental degradation to spillover Leptospira infections in marginalised urban settings: an eco-epidemiological community-based cohort study in Brazil. eLife. 2022;11.
- 26. Hens N, Aerts M, Faes C, Shkedy Z, Lejeune O, Van Damme P, et al. Seventy-five years of estimating the force of infection from current status data. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138(6):802–12. pmid:19765352
- 27. Rees EM, Lau CL, Kama M, Reid S, Lowe R, Kucharski AJ. Estimating the duration of antibody positivity and likely time of Leptospira infection using data from a cross-sectional serological study in Fiji. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(6):e0010506. pmid:35696427
- 28.
Plummer M, Stukalov A, Denwood M. Bayesian Graphical Models using MCMC—package ‘rjags’. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN); 2019.
- 29. Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci. 1992;7(4):457–72.
- 30. Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Generalized additive models for medical research. Stat Methods Med Res. 1995;4(3):187–96. pmid:8548102
- 31. Textor J, van der Zander B, Gilthorpe MS, Liśkiewicz M, Ellison GT. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package “dagitty”. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(6):1887–94. pmid:28089956
- 32. Tennant PWG, Murray EJ, Arnold KF, Berrie L, Fox MP, Gadd SC, et al. Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations. Int J Epidemiol. 2021;50(2):620–32. pmid:33330936
- 33. VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-value. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4):268–74. pmid:28693043
- 34. Giorgi E, Diggle PJ. PrevMap: an R package for prevalence mapping. J Stat Softw. 2017;78:1–29.
- 35.
Akaike H. Akaike’s information criterion. In: International encyclopedia of statistical science, vol. 25; 2011.
- 36. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan L, François R, et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. JOSS. 2019;4(43):1686.
- 37. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48.
- 38.
Barton K, Barton MK. Package ‘mumin.’ Version. 2015;1(18):439.
- 39.
Fox J, Friendly GG, Graves S, Heiberger R, Monette G, Nilsson H, et al. The car package. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2007;1109. 1431 p.
- 40.
Wood S, Wood MS. Package ‘mgcv.’ R package version. 2015;1(29):729.
- 41. Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar M, Patil I, Waggoner P, Makowski D. performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. JOSS. 2021;6(60):3139.
- 42.
Plummer M. rjags: Bayesian Graphical Models using MCMC. R package; 2021.
- 43. Governo do Estado da Bahia. Geopolis: Infraestrutura de Dados Espaciais da Bahia [Internet]; 2026 [cited 2026 May 1]. Available from: https://geopolis.ba.gov.br/
- 44. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Malhas Territoriais [Internet]; 2026 [cited 2026 May 1]. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/organizacao-do-territorio/malhas-territoriais/15774-malhas.html?=&t=downloads
- 45. Shapiro K, Bahia-Oliveira L, Dixon B, Dumètre A, de Wit LA, VanWormer E, et al. Environmental transmission of Toxoplasma gondii: Oocysts in water, soil and food. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019. pmid:32095620
- 46. Casanovas-Massana A, Costa F, Riediger IN, Cunha M, de Oliveira D, Mota DC, et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of pathogenic Leptospira in surface waters from the urban slum environment. Water Res. 2018;130:176–84. pmid:29220718
- 47. Casanovas-Massana A, Neves Souza F, Curry M, de Oliveira D, de Oliveira AS, Eyre MT, et al. Effect of sewerage on the contamination of soil with pathogenic Leptospira in urban slums. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(23):15882–90. pmid:34767339
- 48. Gotteland C, Gilot-Fromont E, Aubert D, Poulle M-L, Dupuis E, Dardé M-L, et al. Spatial distribution of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in soil in a rural area: influence of cats and land use. Vet Parasitol. 2014;205(3–4):629–37. pmid:25178554
- 49. VanWormer E, Fritz H, Shapiro K, Mazet JAK, Conrad PA. Molecules to modeling: Toxoplasma gondii oocysts at the human-animal-environment interface. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;36(3):217–31. pmid:23218130
- 50. Antinarelli LMR, Silva MR, Guimarães RJDPSE, Terror MS, Lima PE, Ishii JDSC, et al. Rural residence remains a risk factor for Toxoplasma infection among pregnant women in a highly urbanized Brazilian area: a robust cross-sectional study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115(8):896–903. pmid:33347595
- 51. Dattoli VCC, Veiga RV, Cunha SS, Pontes-de-Carvalho L, Barreto ML, Alcantara-Neves NM. Oocyst ingestion as an important transmission route of Toxoplasma gondii in Brazilian urban children. J Parasitol. 2011;97(6):1080–4. pmid:21740247
- 52. Mareze M, Benitez A do N, Brandão APD, Pinto-Ferreira F, Miura AC, Martins FDC, et al. Socioeconomic vulnerability associated to Toxoplasma gondii exposure in southern Brazil. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212375. pmid:30763391
- 53. Giese L, Seeber F, Aebischer A, Kuhnert R, Schlaud M, Stark K, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infections and associated factors in female children and adolescents, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30(5):995–9. pmid:38666641
- 54. Passos ADC, Bollela VR, Furtado JMF, Lucena MM de, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Paula JS, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of toxoplasmosis among adults in a small Brazilian city. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018;51(6):781–7. pmid:30517531
- 55. Owers KA, Odetunde J, de Matos RB, Sacramento G, Carvalho M, Nery N, et al. Fine-scale GPS tracking to quantify human movement patterns and exposure to leptospires in the urban slum environment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(8):e0006752. pmid:30169513
- 56. Delight EA, de Carvalho Santiago DC, Palma FAG, de Oliveira D, Souza FN, Santana JO. Gender differences in the perception of leptospirosis severity, behaviours, and Leptospira exposure risk in urban Brazil: a cross-sectional study. medRxiv. 2024. pmid:38746452
- 57. Sahimin N, Mohd Hanapi IR, Nurikhan ZA, Behnke JM, Mohd Zain SN. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infections among urban poor communities in Peninsular Malaysia. Acta Parasitol. 2021;66(2):524–34. pmid:33219942
- 58. Benitez A do N, Gonçalves DD, Nino B de SL, Caldart ET, Freire RL, Navarro IT. Seroepidemiology of toxoplasmosis in humans and dogs from a small municipality in Parana, Brazil. Ciênc Anim Bras. 2017;18(0).
- 59. Cairncross S, Blumenthal U, Kolsky P, Moraes L, Tayeh A. The public and domestic domains in the transmission of disease. Trop Med Int Health. 1996;1(1):27–34. pmid:8673819