Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Amebiasis as a neglected tropical disease: Current knowledge gaps and future directions

  • Debbie-Ann Shirley ,

    dshirley1@ufl.edu

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America

  • Shasika Jayarathne,

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America

  • Cirle A. Warren,

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America

  • Shannon Moonah

    Affiliations Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America, Department of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, GainesvilleFlorida, United States of America

Abstract

Entamoeba histolytica is a protozoan parasite that causes amebic colitis, a leading cause of severe diarrheal disease worldwide, and amebic liver abscess, the most common extraintestinal manifestation of infection. The disease burden is highest in resource-limited settings but remains clinically important in travelers and men who have sex with men in non-endemic regions. Although most infections are asymptomatic, severe and fulminant disease is associated with high mortality, particularly among individuals exposed to corticosteroids or other forms of immunosuppression. The increasing use of molecular diagnostic tools has improved understanding of the epidemiology of E. histolytica and enabled distinction from morphologically identical but nonpathogenic Entamoeba species; however, these diagnostics remain underutilized in many endemic settings due to cost and infrastructure limitations. Treatment options remain limited, with nitroimidazoles constituting the only drug class available for symptomatic invasive disease, leaving few alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate therapy or in the event of emerging resistance. Despite advances in understanding parasite pathogenesis and the application of high-throughput technologies, no licensed vaccine exists, and progress toward vaccine development has been minimal. These persistent gaps highlight the need to reprioritize amebiasis as a neglected tropical disease and to accelerate investment in diagnostics, therapeutics, and preventive strategies.

Introduction

Amebiasis is caused by infection with the protozoan parasite, Entamoeba histolytica [1]. Infection can be asymptomatic or progress to invasive disease, including amebic colitis and amebic liver abscess. Despite its long-standing global impact, amebiasis remains a significantly neglected parasitic disease. Amebic colitis is a leading cause of severe diarrhea and ranks among the top 15 causes of diarrheal illness in children during the first two years of life in low-resource settings, where diarrhea remains among the top five leading causes of childhood mortality [2,3]. Fulminant forms of amebiasis are rare but are associated with remarkably high mortality [4].

The parasite’s life cycle, which alternates between the environmentally resistant infectious cyst and the tissue-invasive trophozoite (Fig 1), facilitates efficient fecal-oral transmission, particularly in environments lacking access to adequate sanitation and hygiene [1,5,6]. Consequently, the highest disease burden occurs in resource-limited settings. In non-endemic settings, infection is typically travel-associated or sexually transmitted [710]. E. histolytica infection remains an important differential diagnosis for persistent diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease mimics, and pyogenic liver abscess.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Life Stages of Entamoeba histolytica.

A) Trichome stain of immature binucleated cyst stage, mature cysts have 4 nuclei measuring about 12–15 µm in diameter. B) Trichome stain of trophozoite, which has a single nucleus and is slightly larger than the cyst stage, measuring about 15–20 µm. A number of ingested red blood cells are also seen (erythrophagocytosis). Image courtesy of the Public Health Image Library (PHIL), CDC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014423.g001

The advent of molecular diagnostics has enabled reliable differentiation of E. histolytica from morphologically identical non-pathogenic species. However, the burden of amebiasis, including the impact of asymptomatic infection to child health, remains poorly understood, and several regions of the world continue to report high prevalences. Although these state-of-the-art tools also facilitate accurate diagnosis, their availability and use remain limited globally, particularly in endemic settings.

Despite advances in understanding parasite adhesion, invasion, phagocytosis, and interactions with the host immune system and microbiota, progress made in treatment and prevention has been limited. Nitroimidazoles remain the only drug class available for treatment of the tissue-invasive disease, with no approved alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate therapy, and no licensed vaccine. Few new therapies are in development, reflecting sustained underinvestment in a disease that disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. Amebiasis therefore represents a paradigmatic neglected tropical enteric infection, characterized by substantial disease burden, diagnostic limitations, and stagnant therapeutic progress.

This review summarizes recent advances in epidemiology, clinical manifestations, laboratory diagnosis, and management of amebiasis, with particular emphasis on developments over the past five years and ongoing areas of unmet need. A structured PubMed search was conducted on December 8, 2025, identifying 377 English-language articles published within the preceding five years, which were independently screened by title and abstract for relevance, incorporating those most pertinent to this review.

Epidemiology

Advances in molecular diagnostics, including PCR and sequencing, are increasingly supplanting traditional microscopy, enabling accurate differentiation of pathogenic E. histolytica from morphologically identical, nonpathogenic species, namely E. dispar, E. moshkovii, and E. bangladeshii [11]. Despite these advances, the current global epidemiology of infection remains poorly understood. While the incidence appears to be declining in some regions, a substantial burden persists in other low-resource and marginalized populations across Africa, Asia, Central, and South America [5].

In the large Global Enteric Multi-Center Study (GEMS), E. histolytica ranked among the top 10 causes of moderate-to-severe diarrhea in children under five at two of seven study sites across sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia [12]. Conversely, in the multisite birth cohort (MAL-ED) study, E. histolytica was infrequently detected and not strongly associated with diarrhea in early childhood, yet recent antigen-based and molecular surveillance studies continue to document significant prevalence among school-aged children and vulnerable populations in many areas [13]. For instance, a school-based cross-sectional study in Dilla, Ethiopia, reported 13.2% positivity by antigen detection [14], while PCR-based screening in Perak, Malaysia, identified E. histolytica in the stool of 5.0% of school children [15]. In Manila, Philippines, PCR detected E. histolytica in 16.4% of residents in an urban slum [16], compared with 0.8% prevalence by antigen detection in a separate community survey in BASECO [17]. These discrepancies highlight persistent but variable endemicity and illustrate how methodological differences influence prevalence estimates. Additional studies report 7.5% positivity by PCR among 895 patients with diarrhea or abdominal discomfort in the Mukuru settlement in Nairobi, Kenya [18], and approximately 5% positivity among patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms in northern and southern India [19,20]. National surveillance data from Mexico demonstrate a relatively stable incidence of 0.47 cases per 100,000 population annually for amebic liver abscess over a 7-year period [21].

Although global mortality from diarrheal diseases is declining, the absolute burden remains substantial. In 2023, enteric infections caused 1.27 million deaths worldwide across, disproportionately affecting children and the elderly, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia [22]. Amebic colitis has historically been estimated to cause over 55,000 deaths annually representing a leading parasitic cause of death [23]. Fulminant amebiasis, while rare, carries a case fatality rate exceeding 20% [4,24,25].

In high-income countries, such as the United States, amebiasis is uncommon but is the third most frequently identified pathogen in returning travelers seeking care for gastrointestinal symptoms [7]. Sexual transmission is increasingly recognized, particularly among men who have sex with men in Asia, Europe and North America [9,15,26]. Endemic transmission may occur in some underserved communities, as evidenced by soil contamination, though contemporary data are limited because amebiasis is no longer reportable in many jurisdictions [27].

Transmission occurs primarily via the fecal–oral route following ingestion of environmentally resilient cysts that contaminate hands, food, or water, with sexual transmission also documented [5,6,9,15,26]. Humans are the only known reservoir. After excystation in the small intestine, trophozoites migrate to the colon, where infection may remain asymptomatic or progress to invasive intestinal or extraintestinal disease. The cyst’s resistance to gastric acid, chlorination, and environmental stressors combined with a low infectious dose, facilitates persistent, often silent transmission in resource-limited settings [28]. Clinical manifestations may develop within weeks after initial infection, but can also develop years later, complicating surveillance and burden estimation [29]. These features underscore the need for integrated interventions combining sanitation, hygiene, and improved surveillance.

Pathogenesis

The wide range of clinical outcomes observed in amebiasis reflects complex interactions among parasite virulence, host immune responses, and environmental factors. Genetic diversity among E. histolytica isolates further contributes to variability in disease severity.

Pathogenesis can be broadly conceptualized as involving host cell death, inflammation, and tissue invasion. Infection begins with parasite adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells through surface adhesins, such as the Gal/GalNAc lectin. Adhesion to host cells is a critical determinant of E. histolytica–induced cell death. Host cell damage is mediated through multiple mechanisms, including induction of programmed cell death, phagocytosis, and trogocytosis. Subsequent secretion of parasite cysteine proteases, along with induction of host matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), leads to degradation of the extracellular matrix and protective mucus layer, collectively enabling mucosal invasion. The parasite-derived macrophage migration inhibitory factor homolog (MIF) further amplifies inflammation by inducing host cytokine responses and upregulating MMP expression [30,31]. These processes are further shaped by immune evasion strategies and resistance to oxidative stress [30,31]. Host susceptibility is also influenced by microbiome composition and clinical factors such as age, pregnancy, immunosuppression, and alcohol use [3235]. The complex pathogenesis of Entamoeba histolytica infection has been well-reviewed elsewhere [30,36]

Clinical considerations

Most individuals infected with E. histolytica remain asymptomatic, with only an estimated 10%–20% developing clinically apparent disease. Symptoms arise following trophozoite invasion of the colonic mucosa resulting in tissue destruction, ulceration, and inflammation. Endoscopic studies have identified asymptomatic patients with invasive disease, underscoring the complexity of host-parasite interactions [33]. Progression to symptomatic infection likely reflects variation in parasite virulence, host immune regulation, nutrition, microbiome composition, and environmental exposures [32,37].

Amebic colitis

Clinical manifestations of amebic colitis range from mild diarrhea to severe dysentery, with common associated symptoms including abdominal pain, cramping, weight loss, and malaise [10]. In non-endemic settings, careful assessment of travel, immigration, and sexual health history is critical for diagnosis [9,38,39].

Endoscopy, when performed, may reveal friable mucosa with discrete ulcerations most commonly involving the cecum and rectum, while intervening mucosa appears normal [40]. Histopathology (Fig 2) may demonstrate trophozoites within the inflammatory exudate and superficial mucosa [40]. Characteristic flask-shaped ulcers reflect submucosal necrosis, a hallmark finding of amebiasis.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Pathologic findings of amebic colitis.

A) Gross pathologic changes in the intestinal mucosa with multiple ulcerations. B) Histopathologic changes under magnification of 500× showing numerous E. histolytica trophozoites, some contain ingested red blood cells (erythrophagocytosis). Image courtesy of the Public Health Image Library (PHIL), CDC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014423.g002

The clinical presentation of amebic colitis can closely resemble inflammatory bowel disease, creating diagnostic challenges with significant therapeutic implications, as corticosteroid exposure can precipitate severe amebic disease [40,41]. Chronic infection may result in ameboma formation, a localized inflammatory mass that can mimic malignancy [42].

Fulminant necrotizing amebic colitis is rare but can be lethal, leading to complications such as bowel necrosis, perforation, peritonitis, toxic megacolon and shock [4]. Corticosteroid exposure is a major risk factor for severe disease [4]. The association was highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic, when multiple cases of severe amebic colitis were reported following dexamethasone exposure for the management of COVID-19 lower airway disease with hypoxemia [4346].

Amebic liver disease

Amebic liver abscess is the most common extraintestinal manifestation and results from hematogenous dissemination via the portal hepatic system. Amebic liver abscesses occur disproportionately in males, often 25–44 years of age and older [21,39]. The reason for male predilection is unclear, but endogenous male hormones are purported to contribute [47]. Similarly, for reasons not well understood, alcohol use is more commonly observed [47,48]. Indigenous alcoholic beverages have been proposed as a source of exposure, though this may be incidental and confounded by poor sanitation [21,49]. Alcohol related liver injury has also been suggested, but a definitive mechanism remains unestablished [47]. Clinical presentation can occur years after initial infection [29,47]. Patients typically present with acute or subacute right upper quadrant pain and fever [39]. Concurrent gastrointestinal symptoms may be absent. Physical examination may reveal hepatomegaly with focal tenderness [39]. Respiratory symptoms such as cough or pleuritic pain may occur when there is adjacent pleural involvement.

Associated laboratory findings frequently include elevated alkaline phosphatase and peripheral leukocytosis with neutrophilic predominance. Imaging studies play a central role in diagnosis. On ultrasound, lesions typically appear as hypoechoic round masses or hypodense lesions with smooth, thin walls on computed tomography (Fig 3). Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates peripheral rim enhancement with a non-enhancing necrotic core on post-contrast sequences. Most amebic liver abscesses are solitary and located in the right hepatic lobe, though left lobe involvement or multiple lesions may occur. Abscess rupture can lead to peritonitis or extension into adjacent structures, including the gall bladder, pleura, and pericardium [5052]. Aspirated fluid (Fig 4) is classically brown and resembles “anchovy paste” [53]. Clinically, amebic liver abscesses can be difficult to distinguish from pyogenic liver abscesses. and laboratory testing is often required [47]. Hydatid cysts due to echinococcosis are another consideration, though these often remain asymptomatic until substantial enlargement, serologic or imaging-based evaluation can aid in differentiation [54].

thumbnail
Fig 3. Amebic liver abscess shown on abdominal computed tomography.

Returning traveler from an endemic area presenting with an amebic liver abscess seen on computed tomography (CT) imaging (white arrows).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014423.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Amebic liver abscess gross pathologic features.

Amebic liver abscess from a live specimen and dark brown purulent fluid extracted from the abscess. Image courtesy of the Public Health Image Library (PHIL), CDC. This image is in the public domain and thus free of any copyright restrictions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014423.g004

Hematogenous dissemination to distant sites is also known to occur, including involvement of the central nervous system [55]. Cutaneous manifestations of extraintestinal amebiasis, although rare, have also been described [56].

Laboratory diagnosis

Advances in antigen-based and molecular diagnostic techniques have substantially improved the detection of E. histolytica. PCR-based assays demonstrate superior sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional methods although diagnosis often requires a combination of approaches depending on clinical presentation and resource availability [1,20] (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Performance of laboratory tests used in the diagnosis of amebiasis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014423.t001

Diagnostic methods for amebiasis includes dual microscopy, antigen detection, molecular testing, and serologic assays. In many resource-limited settings diagnosis continues to rely on microscopic identification of cysts and trophozoites in fresh or preserved stool. While often widely available, microscopy is time-consuming and lacks specificity because pathogenic E. histolytica cannot be reliably distinguished from morphologically identical nonpathogenic species [20]. In addition, the sensitivity of stool microscopy is dependent upon operator expertise, the need for intact structural features, and strict requirements for specimen handling and preservation as trophozoites may disintegrate within one to two hours after collection, leading to substandard sensitivity [20,40]. Notably, stool microscopy can be negative in patients with amebic liver abscess and other extraintestinal manifestations [39].

Stool antigen detection assays using fresh stool, including several commercially available ELISA-based tests, generally perform well in endemic settings but may show reduced sensitivity in non-endemic populations [20,57,58]. Some kits can detect other enteroparasites, however, kits are still not widely available in resource -imited areas and test performance may also be adversely affected by sample freezing or preservation methods as well as by prior antiparasitic therapy which reduces detectable antigen levels [20,59].

Molecular diagnostics including conventional and real-time PCR assays represent the most sensitive and specific methods for detecting E. histolytica in the stool and allow definitive species-level identification [20,57]. It is the preferred method for diagnosis when available, but cost presents a barrier in endemic settings. Multiplex PCR platforms further enable simultaneous differentiation from other enteric pathogens [60]. Despite these advantages PCR testing requires specialized equipment and technical expertise, limiting its availability in many high-burden resource-constrained settings. Use of real-time PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has also been reported as a feasible diagnostic approach for E. histolytica using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue submitted for histopathologic examination, although data remain limited [38]. PCR and antigen-based assays may also be applied to liver aspirate specimens to support the diagnosis of amebic liver abscess [53].

Serologic testing can be particularly useful for the diagnosis of extraintestinal amebiasis including liver abscess especially when stool studies are negative [39]. Antibodies may be absent early in infection. Although serology may be negative early in the course of infection, the persistence for years thereafter limits the ability of serologic assays to differentiate prior exposure from active disease, particularly in endemic settings [1]. Expanding access to affordable, diagnostic tools with high predictive value will be essential to improving clinical management of amebiasis as a neglected tropical infection.

Therapy

All individuals diagnosed with E. histolytica infection, whether with symptoms or not, require treatment (Table 2). Symptomatic invasive disease, including amebic colitis and amebic liver abscess, require combination therapy consisting of a tissue-active amebicidal agent followed by an intraluminal cysticidal agent to eliminate residual intestinal carriage. In contrast, asymptomatic infection can be treated with a single intraluminal agent to prevent progression to invasive disease and to decrease ongoing transmission [1,61].

thumbnail
Table 2. Antiparasitic treatment dosages for Entamoeba histolytica infection [76,77].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014423.t002

At present, nitroimidazoles are the only available tissue-active agents, with metronidazole and tinidazole most commonly used. Metronidazole remains the standard of care as it is widely available but is frequently associated with adverse effects, including nausea, headache, metallic taste, anorexia, neuropathy with prolonged use, and a disulfiram-like reaction with alcohol consumption. Tinidazole offers similar efficacy with a shorter treatment course and may be better tolerated in some patients.

Surgical intervention may be necessary in cases of fulminant amebic colitis complicated by perforation, necrosis, or toxic megacolon. While amebic liver abscesses are often treated medically, percutaneous or surgical drainage may sometimes be considered for large (>5–10 cm), refractory, or complicated amebic liver abscesses [39,62].

Following completion of nitroimidazole therapy, an intraluminal agent is required to eradicate cyst carriage [47]. Paromomycin, a nonabsorbable aminoglycoside, is the preferred luminal agent in the United States. Whether all asymptomatic patients with mucosal lesions are cured is yet to be determined [32,63]. Alternative intraluminal therapies, including diloxanide furoate and iodoquinol, are used in some settings but are not available in the United States, and their utility is limited by availability and adverse effect profiles.

Aside from nitroimidazoles and intraluminal agents, therapeutic options for amebiasis remain extremely limited, underscoring the need for safe, effective, and accessible alternatives (Table 3). Nitazoxanide has been evaluated as an alternative therapy for amebiasis. A randomized trial conducted in the Nile delta of Egypt reported that nitazoxanide was highly effective for treating intestinal amebiasis, achieving a 94% microbiologic cure versus 43% with placebo, but the trial was limited by a small sample size, short follow-up, single geographic setting, and high placebo response [64]. A second trial conducted in Jaipur, India, found that nitazoxanide was as effective as metronidazole for treating uncomplicated amebic liver abscess, with similar clinical and radiologic cure rates and fewer adverse effects, but the study was also limited by a modest sample size, single-center design, with follow-up limited to 6 months [65]. Recurrence of amebic liver abscess can be as high as 9% within 2 years of treatment [48].

thumbnail
Table 3. Anti-parasitic drugs for amebic colitis including approved treatments and agents under clinical development.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014423.t003

Beyond these agents, therapeutic options for amebiasis remain extremely limited for patients who cannot tolerate nitroimidazole therapy or if metronidazole resistance emerges. Resistant strains are readily generated in the laboratory, and recent data indicate that inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀) of nitroimidazoles against clinical E. histolytica isolates may be rising in some areas relative to historical reference values, potentially portending gradual susceptibility loss [66]. In this context, drug repurposing represents a pragmatic and attractive strategy, offering faster clinical translation at lower cost by leveraging compounds with established pharmacokinetic properties and human safety data. Auranofin, a repurposed gold compound, has completed a Phase IIa clinical trial (NCT02736968); however, the enrollment of only a single participant with confirmed amebiasis will substantially limit interpretation of its efficacy and safety [67]. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the combination of the repurposed, inexpensive, and widely available alcohol abuse drug, disulfiram combined with zinc supplement is currently underway (ISRCTN15356736) [6870].

Prevention

Despite the substantial global burden of amebiasis, no licensed human vaccine is currently available. Prevention relies on improved sanitation, clean water access, and hygiene. Vaccine development has primarily remained in the preclinical stage, with efforts focused on parasite antigens critical to host invasion and pathogenicity. The most extensively studied candidate is the Gal/GalNAc lectin, given the key role played in adhesion [71]. Vaccines incorporating recombinant or synthetic peptides derived from the lectin heavy chain have demonstrated partial protection in animal models when administered with appropriate adjuvants [71]. Preclinical studies have evaluated intranasal delivery of LecA-based vaccines formulated with GLA-3M-052 adjuvant in liposomes, demonstrating reproducible spray deposition and minimal lung penetration in adult and infant airway models, supporting the feasibility of mucosal vaccination strategies for amebiasis [72]. Another investigational target, the serine-rich Entamoeba histolytica protein (SREHP), has shown reduced liver abscess formation in gerbil and murine models using DNA-based vaccine platforms [73]. More recently, computational approaches have enabled the design of multi-epitope vaccine candidates targeting surface proteins expressed in both trophozoite and cyst stages [74]. However, none of these candidates have progressed to human clinical trials, and ongoing challenges to vaccine development include incomplete understanding of protective immune correlates, antigenic diversity, and limited commercial investment [75].

Conclusion

Notwithstanding recent advances in molecular diagnostics and fundamental research, amebiasis remains a neglected tropical disease with substantial global burden, limited therapeutic options, and no licensed vaccine. Addressing persistent knowledge gaps in epidemiology, expanding access to accurate diagnostics, and accelerating the development of new treatments and preventative strategies are critical priorities.

Key learning points

  • Amebiasis remains a major cause of severe diarrheal disease and liver abscess worldwide, with the highest burden in resource-limited settings and continued clinical relevance in travelers as well as men who have sex with men in non-endemic regions.
  • Accurate diagnosis of the causative parasite, Entamoeba histolytica, requires molecular or antigen-based testing, as microscopy cannot reliably distinguish pathogenic from nonpathogenic Entamoeba species, however, access to these diagnostics remains limited in many endemic areas.
  • Therapeutic options for invasive amebiasis are narrowly restricted to nitroimidazoles, leaving limited alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate therapy and raises concern about preparedness should drug resistance emerge.
  • Despite advances in understanding parasite biology and host-pathogen interactions, no licensed vaccine exists, underscoring the need for renewed investment in prevention, drug development and equitable access to diagnostics.

Five key papers

  1. Yanagawa Y, Shimogawara R, Takano M, Aoki T, Mizushima D, Gatanaga H, et al. Identification of asymptomatic Entamoeba histolytica infection by a serological screening test: A cross-sectional study of an HIV-negative men who have sex with men cohort in Japan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(4):e000979
  2. Guillén N. Pathogenicity and virulence of Entamoeba histolytica, the agent of amoebiasis. Virulence. 2023 Dec;14(1):2158656. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2022.2158656. PMID: 36519347; PMCID: PMC9815260.
  3. Gonzales MLM, Dans LF, Sio‐Aguilar J. Antiamoebic drugs for treating amoebic colitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019(1). PMID: 30624763; PMCID: PMC6326239.
  4. Singh A, Banerjee T, Shukla SK, Upadhyay S, Verma A. Creep in nitroimidazole inhibitory concentration among the Entamoeba histolytica isolates causing amoebic liver abscess and screening of andrographolide as a repurposing drug. Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 27;13(1):12192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39382-1. PMID: 37500681; PMCID: PMC10374660.
  5. Shrivastav MT, Malik Z, Somlata. Revisiting Drug Development Against the Neglected Tropical Disease, Amebiasis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Feb 24;10:628257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.628257. PMID: 33718258; PMCID: PMC7943716.

References

  1. 1. Shirley D-AT, Farr L, Watanabe K, Moonah S. A review of the global burden, new diagnostics, and current therapeutics for amebiasis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(7):ofy161. pmid:30046644
  2. 2. Liu J, Platts-Mills JA, Juma J, Kabir F, Nkeze J, Okoi C, et al. Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1291–301. pmid:27673470
  3. 3. UNICEF. Current status and progress: diarrhoea remains a leading killer of young children, despite the availability of a simple treatment solution. UNICEF; 2018.
  4. 4. Shirley DA, Moonah S. Fulminant amebic colitis after corticosteroid therapy: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(7):e0004879.
  5. 5. Antonio-Campos A, Farfán-Pira KJ, Díaz-Fonseca AD, Ochoa-Velasco C, Hernández-Carranza P, Torres-Cifuentes DM. Amebiasis in Mexico, 2014-2023. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31(2):359–62.
  6. 6. Sunday AB, Nyasa RB, Mokake M. The influence of COVID-19 barrier measures on the positivity rate of typhoidal salmonellosis and amoebiasis in the Buea Health District, South West Region of Cameroon. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(4):e0001854. pmid:37186243
  7. 7. Swaminathan A, Torresi J, Schlagenhauf P, Thursky K, Wilder-Smith A, Connor BA, et al. A global study of pathogens and host risk factors associated with infectious gastrointestinal disease in returned international travellers. J Infect. 2009;59(1):19–27. pmid:19552961
  8. 8. US Census Bureau. Foreign born: 2019 current population survey detailed tables. Table 1.1 population by sex, age, nativity and US citizenship status: 2019. US Census Bureau. 2019.
  9. 9. Yanagawa Y, Shimogawara R, Takano M, Aoki T, Mizushima D, Gatanaga H, et al. Identification of asymptomatic Entamoeba histolytica infection by a serological screening test: a cross-sectional study of an HIV-negative men who have sex with men cohort in Japan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(4):e0009793. pmid:35468146
  10. 10. Gao YH, Yu M, Wang LN, Dong LF, Li J. A retrospective case series of amebic colitis clinical features at a tertiary hospital in Beijing from 2021 to 2024. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):1527. pmid:41204402
  11. 11. Ali IKM, Roy S. A real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection and differentiation of four common entamoeba species that infect humans. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;59(1):e01986-20. pmid:33115843
  12. 12. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):209–22. pmid:23680352
  13. 13. Platts-Mills JA, Babji S, Bodhidatta L, Gratz J, Haque R, Havt A, et al. Pathogen-specific burdens of community diarrhoea in developing countries: a multisite birth cohort study (MAL-ED). Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(9):e564-75. pmid:26202075
  14. 14. Abate M, Eriso F, Kalyankar VB, Padwal ND, Singh SC, Upadhye V, et al. Prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica among schoolchildren in Dilla town, Gedeo zone, Ethiopia. Infect Dis Now. 2023;53(1):104621. pmid:36255042
  15. 15. Tokijoh NI, Bakar AA, Othman N, Noordin R, Saidin S. Assessing the prevalence and risk factors associated with Entamoeba complex infection among the Orang Asli school children in Perak, Malaysia through molecular approach. Parasitol Int. 2022;91:102638. pmid:35926695
  16. 16. Adao DEV, Li AOC, Dy AES, Rivera WL. Development of a salivary IgA detection method for accurate diagnosis of amebiasis. J Parasit Dis. 2022;46(3):714–21. pmid:36091277
  17. 17. Rivera WL, De Jesus Ii FC, De Cadiz AE, Villacorte EA, Tongol-Rivera PN, Kanbara H. Entamoeba histolytica infections in a slum community in Manila, Philippines as detected by stool ELISA. Ann Parasitol. 2021;67(4):757–62. pmid:35294144
  18. 18. Mulinge E, Mbae C, Ngugi B, Irungu T, Matey E, Kariuki S. Entamoeba species infection in patients seeking treatment for diarrhea and abdominal discomfort in Mukuru informal settlement in Nairobi, Kenya. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2021;23:e00122. pmid:33898796
  19. 19. Singh A, Banerjee T, Khan U, Shukla SK. Epidemiology of clinically relevant Entamoeba spp. (E. histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii/bangladeshi): a cross sectional study from North India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(9):e0009762.
  20. 20. Das S, Rajkumari N, Gunalan A, Rajavelu D, Olickal JJ. A comparative analysis of microscopy, coproantigen serology, and nested multiplex pcr in the laboratory diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica infection. J Lab Physicians. 2021;14(2):125–31. pmid:35982881
  21. 21. Bello-López JM, Cruz-Cruz C, Loyola-Cruz MÁ, Quiroga-Vargas E, Martínez-Figueroa C, Cureño-Díaz MA, et al. Epidemiology of the first seven years of national surveillance of amoebic liver abscesses in Mexico. Parasitol Int. 2023;92:102678. pmid:36100178
  22. 22. Naghavi M, Kyu HH, A B, Aalipour MA, Aalruz H, Ababneh HS, et al. Global burden of 292 causes of death in 204 countries and territories and 660 subnational locations, 1990–2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. The Lancet. 2025;406(10513):1811–72.
  23. 23. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128. pmid:23245604
  24. 24. Barrón-Díaz DR, Meza-Hernández J, Hernández-Montiel E, Solis-Coronado O, Betancourt-Ferreyra JJ, Núñez-Venzor A, et al. Fulminant amoebic colitis: a challenging diagnosis for the surgeon. J Surg Case Rep. 2024;2024(11):rjae724. pmid:39588218
  25. 25. Rahadiani N, Habiburrahman M, Putranto AS, Handjari DR, Stephanie M, Krisnuhoni E. Fulminant necrotizing amoebic colitis presenting as acute appendicitis: a case report and comprehensive literature review. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2022;16(4):717–25. pmid:35544636
  26. 26. Kawashima A, Yanagawa Y, Shimogawara R, Yagita K, Gatanaga H, Watanabe K. Amebiasis as a sexually transmitted infection: A re-emerging health problem in developed countries. Glob Health Med. 2023;5(6):319–27. pmid:38162428
  27. 27. Crudo Blackburn C, Yan SM, McCormick D, Herrera LN, Iordanov RB, Bailey MD, et al. Parasitic contamination of soil in the southern United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024;111(3):506–14. pmid:39043177
  28. 28. Shirley D-AT, Watanabe K, Moonah S. Significance of amebiasis: 10 reasons why neglecting amebiasis might come back to bite us in the gut. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(11):e0007744. pmid:31725715
  29. 29. Kaiser RWJ, Allgeier J, Philipp AB, Mayerle J, Rothe C, Wallrauch C, et al. Development of amoebic liver abscess in early pregnancy years after initial amoebic exposure: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):424. pmid:33317457
  30. 30. Guillén N. Pathogenicity and virulence of Entamoeba histolytica, the agent of amoebiasis. Virulence. 2023;14(1):2158656. pmid:36519347
  31. 31. Ghosh S, Padalia J, Moonah S. Tissue destruction caused by Entamoeba histolytica parasite: cell death, inflammation, invasion, and the gut microbiome. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2019;6(1):51–7. pmid:31008019
  32. 32. Yanagawa Y, Singh U. Diversity and plasticity of virulent characteristics of Entamoeba histolytica. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023;8(5):255. pmid:37235303
  33. 33. Yanagawa Y, Nagata N, Yagita K, Watanabe K, Okubo H, Kikuchi Y. Clinical features and gut microbiome of asymptomatic Entamoeba histolytica infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2020.
  34. 34. Iyer LR, Chandel N, Verma AK, Thakur V, Paul J, Mandal AK, et al. Effect of Entamoeba histolytica infection on gut microbial diversity and composition in diarrheal patients from New Delhi. Parasitol Res. 2023;122(1):285–98. pmid:36399171
  35. 35. Ngobeni R, Samie A, Moonah S, Watanabe K, Petri WA Jr, Gilchrist C. Entamoeba species in South Africa: correlations with the host microbiome, parasite burdens, and first description of Entamoeba bangladeshi outside of Asia. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(12):1592–600. pmid:29236996
  36. 36. Cornick S, Chadee K. Entamoeba histolytica: host parasite interactions at the colonic epithelium. Tissue Barriers. 2017;5(1):e1283386. pmid:28452682
  37. 37. Yanagawa Y, Nagata N, Yagita K, Watanabe K, Okubo H, Kikuchi Y, et al. Clinical features and gut microbiome of asymptomatic Entamoeba histolytica infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(9):e3163–71. pmid:32564059
  38. 38. Müller A, Frickmann H, Tannich E, Poppert S, Hagen RM. Colitis caused by Entamoeba histolytica identified by real-time-PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2022;12(3):84–91.
  39. 39. Nasrallah J, Akhoundi M, Haouchine D, Marteau A, Mantelet S, Wind P, et al. Updates on the worldwide burden of amoebiasis: a case series and literature review. J Infect Public Health. 2022;15(10):1134–41. pmid:36155852
  40. 40. Yue B, Meng Y, Zhou Y, Zhao H, Wu Y, Zong Y. Characteristics of endoscopic and pathological findings of amebic colitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1):367. pmid:34627159
  41. 41. Abasszade JH, Little R, Yeaman F, Robertson M, Bell S. Amoebic colitis: a case series of a recurring missed diagnosis. JGH Open. 2020;5(3):404–7. pmid:33732890
  42. 42. Khlif T, Nasri S, Safta AB, Hamza F, Ajouli W, Nouira R. Colic ameboma mimicking colic cancer: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025;129:111149. pmid:40120325
  43. 43. Shirley D-A, Moonah S. COVID-19 and corticosteroids: unfamiliar but potentially fatal infections that can arise following short-course steroid treatment. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;104(3):790–3. pmid:33410395
  44. 44. Motobayashi H, Sumiyoshi S, Aoki K, Yogo A, Tochitani K, Yamamoto S, et al. A case of amebic colitis and liver abscesses that occurred after treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 with dexamethasone. IDCases. 2022;31:e01648. pmid:36447935
  45. 45. Maricuto AL, Velásquez VL, Pineda J, Flora-Noda DM, Rodríguez I, Rodríguez-Inés CA, et al. Amoebic liver abscess in a COVID-19 patient: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):1134. pmid:34736397
  46. 46. Dorantes JA, López-Becerril JO, Zavala-Cerna MG. Fatal attraction: intestinal amebiasis and COVID-19 as risk factors for colonic perforation. J Surg Case Rep. 2021;2021(7):rjab301. pmid:34316344
  47. 47. Noveir SD, Hoang A, Li K, Lam JC, Akkad K. Recurrent amebic liver abscesses despite metronidazole treatment: a rare case report. Clin Case Rep. 2023;11(11):e8138. pmid:37927979
  48. 48. Singh A, Banerjee T, Shukla SK. Factors associated with high rates of recurrence of amebic liver abscess (ALA) in North India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;104(4):1383–7. pmid:33432901
  49. 49. Kumanan T, Sujanitha V, Balakumar S, Sreeharan N. Amoebic liver abscess and indigenous alcoholic beverages in the tropics. J Trop Med. 2018;2018:6901751. pmid:30112008
  50. 50. Chandra E, Badgurjar MK, Mukhiya GW, Parihar S, Pandya N. Amebiasis of the gallbladder: a rare presentation. Cureus. 2025;17(9):e92837. pmid:41127724
  51. 51. Sánchez Zamora P, Gallotti AC, Ramos R, Ligero López J, González Y, Mejía RA, et al. An unexpected case of disseminated amebiasis with cerebral involvement and successful recovery in a non-endemic context. Am J Case Rep. 2021;22:e934188. pmid:34893577
  52. 52. Matsuo T, Saito A, Kawai F, Ishikawa K, Hasegawa R, Suzuki T, et al. Use of PCR in the diagnosis of pericardial amebiasis: a case report and systematic review of the literature. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):960. pmid:34530739
  53. 53. Portunato F, Bartalucci C, Vena A, Giacobbe DR, Porcile E, Montanelli P, et al. Amoebic liver abscess: potential application of new diagnostic techniques for an old pathogen. Infect Dis Ther. 2024;13(3):625–32. pmid:38459236
  54. 54. Brunetti E, Kern P, Vuitton DA, Writing Panel for the WHO-IWGE. Expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in humans. Acta Trop. 2010;114(1):1–16. pmid:19931502
  55. 55. Marzban A, Ghasemikhah R. Global systematic review of patients with cerebral amebiasis: successful and rapid clinical and paraclinical diagnostic methods. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025;113(3):116979. pmid:40602053
  56. 56. Lai D, Kim BK, Bastawrous A. Peristomal cutaneous amebiasis causing rapidly progressive necrotic wound of a left lower quadrant end colostomy. BMJ Case Rep. 2024;17(1):e256003. pmid:38238164
  57. 57. Ryan U, Paparini A, Oskam C. New technologies for detection of enteric parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33(7):532–46. pmid:28385423
  58. 58. Stark D, van Hal S, Fotedar R, Butcher A, Marriott D, Ellis J, et al. Comparison of stool antigen detection kits to PCR for diagnosis of amebiasis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(5):1678–81. pmid:18367563
  59. 59. Prim N, Escamilla P, Solé R, Llovet T, Soriano G, Muñoz C. Risk of underdiagnosing amebic dysentery due to false-negative Entamoeba histolytica antigen detection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73(4):372–3. pmid:22683092
  60. 60. Madden GR, Shirley DA, Townsend G, Moonah S. Case report: lower gastrointestinal bleeding due to Entamoeba histolytica detected early by multiplex PCR: case report and review of the laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;101(6):1380–3.
  61. 61. Gonzales MLM, Dans LF, Sio-Aguilar J. Antiamoebic drugs for treating amoebic colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1(1):CD006085. pmid:30624763
  62. 62. Chavez-Tapia NC, Hernandez-Calleros J, Tellez-Avila FI, Torre A, Uribe M. Image-guided percutaneous procedure plus metronidazole versus metronidazole alone for uncomplicated amoebic liver abscess. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2009(1):CD004886. pmid:19160244
  63. 63. Blessmann J, Tannich E. Treatment of asymptomatic intestinal Entamoeba histolytica infection. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(17):1384.
  64. 64. Rossignol J-F, Kabil SM, El-Gohary Y, Younis AM. Nitazoxanide in the treatment of amoebiasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(10):1025–31. pmid:17658567
  65. 65. Goel V, Jain A, Sharma G, Jhajharia A, Agarwal VK, Ashdhir P, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of nitazoxanide in uncomplicated amebic liver abscess. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2021;40(3):272–80. pmid:33991310
  66. 66. Singh A, Banerjee T, Shukla SK, Upadhyay S, Verma A. Creep in nitroimidazole inhibitory concentration among the Entamoeba histolytica isolates causing amoebic liver abscess and screening of andrographolide as a repurposing drug. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):12192. pmid:37500681
  67. 67. Andrade RM, Reed SL. New drug target in protozoan parasites: the role of thioredoxin reductase. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:975. pmid:26483758
  68. 68. Ghosh S, Farr L, Singh A, Leaton L-A, Padalia J, Shirley D-A, et al. COP9 signalosome is an essential and druggable parasite target that regulates protein degradation. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(9):e1008952. pmid:32960936
  69. 69. Shirley D-A, Sharma I, Warren CA, Moonah S. Drug repurposing of the alcohol abuse medication disulfiram as an anti-parasitic agent. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:633194. pmid:33777846
  70. 70. Sharma I, Farr L, Moonah S. Alcohol abuse drug disulfiram is effective against cyst stages of Entamoeba histolytica parasite. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(11):e0083222.
  71. 71. Quach J, St-Pierre J, Chadee K. The future for vaccine development against Entamoeba histolytica. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(6):1514–21. pmid:24504133
  72. 72. Murphy BM, Chen JZ, Rolo M, Eldam M, Jordan L, Sivananthan SJ, et al. Intranasal delivery of a synthetic Entamoeba histolytica vaccine containing adjuvant (LecA + GLA-3 M-052 liposomes): in vitro characterization. Int J Pharm. 2022;626:122141.
  73. 73. Nagaraja S, Ankri S. Target identification and intervention strategies against amebiasis. Drug Resist Updat. 2019;44:1–14. pmid:31112766
  74. 74. Chatterjee D, Al Rimon R, Chowdhury UF, Islam MR. A multi-epitope based vaccine against the surface proteins expressed in cyst and trophozoite stages of parasite Entamoeba histolytica. J Immunol Methods. 2023;517:113475. pmid:37088358
  75. 75. Shrivastav MT, Malik Z, Somlata . Revisiting drug development against the neglected tropical disease, amebiasis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:628257.
  76. 76. Kimberlin DW, Banerjee R, Barnett ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH. Red book: 2024–2027 report of the committee on infectious diseases. In: Committee on Infectious Diseases AAOP, editor. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2024.
  77. 77. Abramowicz J. Drugs for parasitic infections. 2nd ed. New Rochelle, New York; 2010.