Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Targeting surface cell antigen 2 increases sensitivity of Rickettsia typhi detection

  • Weerawat Phuklia ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    weerawat@tropmedres.ac

    Affiliation Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

  • Kaisone Padith,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

  • Koukeo Phommasone,

    Roles Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

  • Vilada Chansamouth,

    Roles Investigation, Resources

    Affiliation Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

  • Mayfong Mayxay,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliations Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, Institute of Research and Education Development (IRED), University of Health Sciences, Ministry of Health, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

  • Susath Vongphachanh,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic

  • Paul N. Newton,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Matthew T. Robinson,

    Roles Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Elizabeth A. Ashley

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background

Murine typhus is a flea-borne disease caused by Rickettsia typhi that typically presents as an acute febrile illness. The diagnosis is often missed, leading to delays in appropriate treatment. A qPCR targeting a single gene (ompB) for R. typhi is widely used for diagnosis; however, it has low sensitivity for detecting bacterial DNA in patients’ blood.

We aimed to increase sensitivity of detection of R. typhi using qPCR by targeting a gene containing repetitive sequences, sca2 (surface cell antigen 2).

Methodology

We compared diagnostic accuracy with the standard assay targeting single sequence ompB (outer membrane protein B). Specificity, sensitivity, and bacterial load measurement of both assays were compared using stored EDTA-anticoagulated buffy coat samples from 88 patients with febrile illness at Mahosot Hospital or provincial hospitals in Laos. Among these, 55 cases were confirmed as positive or negative by first culturing Rickettsia spp. from patients’ EDTA blood, followed by assessment with IFA and ompB PCR, and buffy coat from 6 additional cases was confirmed by ompB PCR. Ten further positive cases were confirmed by IFA using paired sera, and 17 cases classified as negative for scrub typhus and murine typhus based on Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) results were included in the evaluation.

Results

The sca2 qPCR assay showed 59.09% sensitivity (95% CI, 38.73-76.74%) and 100% specificity (93.98-100%) for detection of R. typhi. In comparison, ompB assay demonstrated 36.36% sensitivity (95% CI, 19.73-57.05%) and 100% specificity (95% CI 93.98-100%). DNA copy number determined using the sca2 gene was approximately 2.933 log unit higher than that determined using ompB gene (median, 16,500 copies/μL; IQR, 13,045–40,000 versus median, 19.25 copies/μL; IQR, 11.11-56.62, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

This study suggests qPCR targeting sca2 increases frequency of detection of R. typhi in patients with low bacterial DNA concentrations.

Author summary

Rickettsia typhi is a bacterium that causes murine typhus. This disease is often overlooked because its symptoms are very similar to those of other infections. It can also be hard to detect because patients usually have a low blood bacterial concentration, making it difficult for current assays to detect. We focused on a part of the bacteria called sca2 (surface cell antigen 2), which has repeating sections, thinking that looking for these repeating sections could make molecular detection methods more sensitive, allowing them to detect even very low levels of the bacteria. We designed a new test that targets these repeating sections of the sca2 gene and tested it using different strains of R. typhi and related bacteria. Compared to the conventional test that looks for the ompB (outer membrane protein B) gene, the new sca2 test was able to detect lower amounts of the bacteria in patient samples. This means it could be a more effective tool for diagnosing the disease, especially when the amount of bacteria in a patient’s blood is very low.

Introduction

Rickettsia typhi is an obligate intracellular bacterium that causes the neglected disease murine typhus. Both the rat flea (Xenopsylla cheopis) and the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis), play a role in transmitting the disease [1]. The disease has a worldwide distribution, including in the Lao PDR (Laos) [2]. Although the disease is frequently mild and responds to key antibiotics, the mortality rate in untreated patients is approximately 0.4% [3]. Misdiagnosis often leads to inappropriate treatment. In the absence of a single gold diagnostic standard, a combination of serology and PCR performed on acute samples is widely accepted for the diagnosis of murine typhus. However, some serological methods cannot provide results quickly enough for early clinical decision-making [46]. In contrast, quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting R. typhi-specific genes is a valuable tool for early diagnosis, as it can detect bacterial DNA in acute patient samples [7]. The outer membrane protein B (ompB) gene is commonly used as a target for R. typhi detection [8]. However, it targets a single-copy region of the gene and its sensitivity may be limited, especially in patients with a low bacterial load [9]. In the case of Orientia tsutsugamushi, another obligate intracellular bacterium, targeting repetitive gene sequences has been shown to improve diagnostic sensitivity [10]. We therefore proposed applying a similar strategy for murine typhus.

Surface cell antigen (sca) proteins belong to the autotransporter protein family in Rickettsia. The R. typhi genome encodes five Sca proteins; sca1, sca2, sca3, sca4 and sca5. These proteins are essential for bacterial survival. Although R. typhi contains relatively few repetitive sequences in its genome [11], the sca2 gene has six tandem repeats within a 150-base-pair region. This protein may facilitate bacterial adhesion to host cells [12]. Given its essential role in R. typhi’s intracellular replication, the sca2 gene represents a promising new target for diagnostic assays. In this study we aimed to develop a qPCR assay for R. typhi detection by targeting a gene region containing repetitive sequences (sca2) and to compare its performance for detection of R. typhi with the existing qPCR assay that targets ompB.

Methods

Ethics statement

These samples were part of previous studies that were approved by the National University of Laos, National Ethics Committee for Health Research (NECHR) and National Institute of Public Health (NIOPH), Vientiane and Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC), Faculty of Medical Sciences. For all studies, written informed consent was obtained from all adult participants and from parents or legal guardians of child participants prior to sample collection.

Assay development

Searching for repetitive sequences.

The sca2 gene, encoding the 190-kDa surface cell antigen (sca2) of Rickettsia typhi strain Wilmington, was identified from the complete genome sequence (GenBank accession number AE017197.1) at genomic positions 68,152–72,603 and corresponds to locus tag RT0052. To investigate repetitive sequence within the R. typhi sca2 gene, the full length of nucleotide sequence (4,452 bp) was submitted to the Tandem Repeat Finder (https://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.basic.submit.html). The sequence was analyzed as described [13] and four regions containing repetitive sequences are illustrated in S1 Fig. The region with the highest number of repetitive sequences was selected as the target for PCR detection. Primers were designed to amplify this region using Primer 3 (https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/), as shown in S1 Fig. PCR amplification using these primers generates products whose size may vary depending on the number of repeat copies in the target region. The primer sequences were sca2F 5’- TGGAATGGACAGTAAAACGACAG-3’ and sca2R 5’- CGTTCTGCTGCCTCTTCTGA-3’.

Determination of assay specificity.

To test the specificity of the selected primers, stored DNA from several strains of cultured R. typhi (Wilmington, AZ331 and GER), as well as DNA from other bacteria including Rickettsia prowazekii, Rickettsia felis, Rickettsia conorii, O. tsutsugamushi, Burkholderia thailandensis, Burkholderia cepacia, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Leptospira spp., and Neorickettsia sennetsu were subjected to PCR and the bands were observed using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.

R. typhi quantification by quantitative real time PCR (qPCR).

DNA from R. typhi culture or patients’ buffy coat was extracted using GeneJet Genomic DNA purification kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA copy number of R. typhi was measured using qPCR targeting either sca2 or ompB. The primers for sca2 were described above, and the Taqman probe for the sca2 gene was sca2P: 5’-FAM- ACAGATAACATAGCAGCAGAATCT-BHQ1–3’. The primers and Taqman probe for ompB were Rt557F: 5’- TGGTATTACTGCTCAACAAGCT-3’, Rt678R: 5’-CAGTAAAGTCTATTGATCCTACACC-3’ and Rt640 BP: 5’-FAM- CGCGATCGTTAATAGCACCAGCATTATCGCG -BHQ1–3’. The qPCR mixture was composed of 1X qPCRBIO Probe Mix (qPCR Probe MIX LO-ROX, PCR Biosystems, UK), 0.4 μM forward and reverse primers, 0.2 μM probe, sterile distilled water and 1μL of extracted DNA. The sca2 qPCR assay was performed in the presence of 0.4 μg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA) per reaction to improve amplification efficiency. BSA helps stabilize the DNA polymerase and mitigate the inhibitory effects of secondary structures often present in repetitive sequences, enhancing reproducibility and sensitivity of the assay [14,15]. Real-time PCR was performed on a CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories) using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec and combined annealing and extension at 60°C for 30 sec with the acquisition of fluorescence. Rickettsial DNA copies per ml of blood were calculated using 10-fold serial dilution of known concentrations of R. typhi sca2 and ompB fragments cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (ranging from 106 to 100 copies/μL).

Limit of detection (LOD) for qPCR assays using R. typhi spiked blood.

Limit of detection (LOD) is defined as the minimum number of DNA copies in a sample that can be reliably detected with the assay. We used the plaque assay, the gold standard for Rickettsia quantification [16], to determine rickettsial load in terms of plaque forming units (pfu). R. typhi strain Wilmington was used to spike whole blood collected from healthy donors (n = 2). Purified R. typhi was serially diluted ten-fold and spiked into blood samples. Specifically, 30μL of media containing R. typhi at concentrations ranging from 101-106 pfu/mL was added to 270 μL of blood. The resulting 300 μL mixture containing R. typhi ranging from 3 x 10-1 to 3 x 104 pfu/total blood was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes, after which DNA was extracted from 300 μL of blood using GeneJet Genomic DNA Purification Kit as described by manufacturer’s instruction (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK). R. typhi DNA in each dilution was quantified using both the ompB and sca2 qPCR assays.

Diagnostic accuracy testing

Clinical samples.

Three groups of stored buffy coat samples were used to validate and compare the specificity and sensitivity of the sca2 and ompB assays. Relevant studies included “A multicentre, open-label randomized trial comparing 3-day doxycycline, 7-day doxycycline, and 3-day azithromycin for scrub and murine typhus” (OxTREC no. 003–03 and 1413/FMS), “The pathophysiology of typhus in Laos” (OxTREC no. 015–04 and 010/NECHR) and “A cross-sectional prospective study to identify the pathogenicity of acute non-malaria febrile illness” (OxTREC no. 015–10 and 134/NECHR). Samples in this group were confirmed by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and ompB PCR from cell culture or by ompB PCR from buffy coat. The second group of samples came from patients confirmed to have murine typhus (n = 10) from a fever surveillance study in three provinces in Laos (OxTREC no. 027–14 and 026 NIOPH/NECHR). Diagnosis in this group was confirmed by IFA using paired sera (acute and convalescent). The third group consisted of buffy coat samples from patients (n = 17) who tested negative for murine typhus RDT (ImmunoDOT Rickettsia typhi test (GenBio)) and scrub typhus by RDTs (Scrub Typhus Detect IgM Rapid System (Dipstick) (InBios)) in a prospective study of the causes of fever amongst hospitalized patients in Lao PDR (Tables 1 and S1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Repetitive sequence regions of sca2 gene investigation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014004.t001

DNA extraction.

DNA was freshly extracted from the frozen buffy coat samples using the GeneJet Genomic DNA Purification Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 200 μl of the buffy coat was lysed and precipitated with ethanol, and the mixture was passed through a spin column for DNA binding. The final elution volume was 100 μl per sample. DNA was stored at −80°C for long-term preservation and at 4°C between qPCR runs.

Data analysis

The sensitivity and specificity of the qPCR assay targeting ompB and sca2 were calculated. Statistical significance was tested by Fisher’s exact test. The 95% confidence interval of sensitivity and specificity were calculated using Wilson-Brown method. As the qPCR copy number data were not normally distributed and included outliers, median and interquartile range (IQR) of Rickettsial loads determined by both assays was compared using Wilcoxon test. Graphical representations were calculated and generated using GraphPad Prism (version 10).

Results

Repetitive sequences on R. typhi sca2 sequence

Repetitive sequences were identified at four distinct regions along the full-length R. typhi sca2 gene. These regions contain approximately 2.3, 1.8, 2.1 and 6 copies repetitive elements, respectively, with varying sequence lengths, as summarized in Table 1. Among these, the region located at position 2360–3262 had the highest number of repeats (6 copies) and the largest sequence size. Due to its high repeat number and sequence length this region was selected as the target for qPCR assay development.

Specificity testing

To evaluate the specificity of the designed primers for R. typhi, we first conducted in silico analysis comparing R. typhi strains to other Rickettsia species. The analysis demonstrated that the primers were specific to R. typhi genomes and did not amplify sequences from other species, including R. prowazekii.

We then validated these findings experimentally by performing conventional PCR using DNA extracted from R. typhi strains Wilmington, AZ331, and GER, as well as from other bacterial species. The result confirmed that sca2 assay specifically amplified DNA from R. typhi strains, with no amplification observed in non-R. typhi samples (S2 Fig).

Optimization of qPCR targeting sca2 assay and ompB

To determine the limit of detection (LOD) for both qPCR assays, serial 10-fold dilutions (106 to 100 copies/μL) of R. typhi sca2 and ompB fragments cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector were used. The result showed that the LOD for the ompB assay was 10 copies/μL, while the sca2 assay demonstrated higher sensitivity with a LOD of 1 copy/μL (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Standard curve for Rickettsia typhi qPCR assay.

Assay used plasmid (pGEM-Teasy) carrying ompB or sca2 fragment of R. typhi as target sequences, with concentrations ranging from 1 to 106 copies/μL. The line with the blank triangle represents patient samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014004.g001

Limit of detection for qPCR assays targeting ompB or sca2 using R. typhi spiked blood

We also compared the limit of detection between ompB and sca2 assays by spiking whole blood with partially purified R. typhi. The result showed that qPCR using ompB was able to detect R. typhi 3 pfu/ 300 μL of whole blood whereas sca2 was able to detect R. typhi 0.3 pfu/mL as demonstrated in Fig 2 and raw data for Cycle threshold (Ct) value are provided in S1 Data.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Limit of detection of sca2 and ompB qPCR assay.

R. typhi ranging from 0.3 to 3 x 104 PFU of 30 μL of culture media containing R. typhi was spiked into 300 μL of whole blood from two healthy donors. Whole blood without R. typhi was included as the 0-PFU control. R. typhi was detected using different two assays targeting the sca2 (grey) and ompB (black) genes. Each dot represents a Ct value obtained from qPCR for sca2 or ompB. Dashed lines indicate the median with interquartile range (IQR) as error bars. Experiments for each gene were performed in triplicate per donor. The horizontal dashed line at Ct = 40 indicates the positivity cut-off (Ct ≤ 40).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014004.g002

Sensitivity and specificity testing of sca2 and ompB

Clinical samples were subjected to both qPCR assays to compare their sensitivity and specificity. Raw qPCR Ct values and IFA results are provided in S1 Data. The results showed that the sensitivity of sca2 assay was 59.09% (95% CI, 38.73-76.74%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI, 93.98-100) whereas the sensitivity of the ompB assay was 36.36% (19.73-57.05%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI, 93.98-100%) (Table 2)

thumbnail
Table 2. Sensitivity and specificity of sca2 and ompB qPCR assays testing.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014004.t002

Rickettsial target gene copy number determination from positive R. typhi buffy coat by ompB PCR

In order to compare rickettsial target gene copy number in buffy coat detected by sca2 and ompB PCR, we calculated the copy number for both targets using R. typhi sca2 or ompB fragments cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector at concentrations ranging from 100 to 106 copies/μL. The median rickettsia target gene copy number detected using sca2 gene was 16,500 copies/μL (IQR, 13,045–40,000), whereas for the ompB assay and it was 19.25 copies/μL (IQR, 11.11-56.62) (Fig 3). Raw data of rickettsia target gene copy number are provided in S1 Data.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Comparison of Rickettsia target gene copy number using qPCR targeting ompB and sca2.

Bacterial DNA from buffy coat samples (n = 13) were determined using ompB assay (grey) and sca2 assay (black). Grey and black bar represent the median Rickettsia target gene copy numbers with interquartile range (IQR). Difference between assays were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014004.g003

Discussion

This study developed a qPCR assay targeting the sca2 gene, which contains six repetitive sequences, for the detection of R. typhi. Unlike the single-copy ompB gene, this assay leverages multiple template copies per genome, enhancing analytical sensitivity for detecting low-level bacteremia commonly observed in murine typhus patients (approximately 200 copies/μL) [9]. A multiple-copy gene approach has been used for detection of various pathogens, including Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in asymptomatic infections [17]. Chao et al also developed a qPCR assay targeting multiple genes to detect fifteen different strains of O. tsutsugamushi isolates and in patient samples [10]. Although multiple gene copies are not found in the R. typhi genome, genes containing repetitive sequences have been identified [18]. In this study, we applied a multiple-target approach by designing primers and a probe to bind all six repetitive sequences within the sca2 gene. This enabled the primers and probe to bind six times, compared to targeting a single-copy gene. Currently, qPCR assays for R. typhi detection in clinical samples typically target single sequence such as ompB. In our in vitro experiments using plasmid containing fragments of sca2 and ompB, the sca2-based assay could detect DNA at 10-fold lower concentrations than the ompB-based assay (1copy/μL versus 10 copies/μL). In spiked samples, serial dilutions of R. typhi showed that the sca2 assay had lower limit of detection (0.3 PFU) compared to ompB (3 PFU), indicating higher sensitivity. These findings were supported by accuracy testing using buffy coat samples with known R. typhi infection status. Another study used the parvulin-type PPIase (prsA) genes as the qPCR target and reported 10-fold greater sensitivity than ompB [7]. However, prsA testing was not evaluated in this study. Other Rickettsia genes, such as citrate synthase (gltA) and 17 kDa lipoprotein outer membrane antigens (17-kDa), were not evaluated in this study, as both assays were commonly used for genus-level screening; ompB and sca2 were selected for species-specific detection [19]. Quantification of rickettsial target gene copy number using sca2 and ompB assays revealed significantly higher bacterial copy numbers when using the sca2-based assay. This suggests that sca2 is a valuable target for detecting R. typhi in patients with low bacterial loads and for monitoring bacteria clearance in antibiotic treatment studies. Interestingly, the rickettsia target gene copy number detected by sca2 was approximately 800-fold higher than that determined by ompB, despite theoretical expectation of only a six-fold increase based on repeat copy number. Several factors may explain this discrepancy. First, the TaqMan probe can cleave a new probe during each PCR cycle, generating fluorescent signal more rapidly [20]. Second, secondary structures within the repeat sequences may make the amplicon more accessible, enhancing primer and probe binding [21]. Third, repeat sequences may amplify more efficiently than single-copy targets due to thermodynamic advantages [22]. Finally, in genes with tandem repeats, primers and probes can potentially rebind multiple times during extension, further increasing fluorescence [23].

Although sca2 is more sensitive than ompB and can detect lower copy numbers in clinical samples with a low bacterial burden, the cost is not expected to be higher, as the assay differs only in primer sequences and uses the same probe labeling chemistry (5′ FAM and 3′ BHQ1). Cost would increase only if longer oligonucleotides are required.

The sca2 qPCR assay is feasible for use in the tested population and can be applied alongside the ompB assay. Since murine typhus patients typically have low bacterial loads, ompB-based qPCR may fail to detect low levels of DNA. In such cases, sca2 qPCR serves as a complementary target, improving diagnostic confidence.

Murine typhus patients are usually treated with doxycycline after rapid antibody-based testing, before qPCR confirmation. This does not differentially affect qPCR reaction [24], as antibiotic treatment reduces bacterial load and impacts detection of all targets similarly. Therefore, improved detection with sca2 reflects enhanced analytical sensitivity at low bacterial loads rather than a gene-specific effect. In practice, qPCR positivity depends on the timing of sample collection relative to antibiotic initiation and the initial bacterial burden [2527]. In this study, samples were collected at presentation or shortly after antibiotic therapy, reflecting routine diagnostic conditions.

This study had several limitations. Specificity testing was limited, as DNA from all Rickettsia spp. was not available. The number of clinical samples used for assay validation was small. The developed assay was optimized for detecting R. typhi in buffy coat samples, but not for other sample types or sources, including vectors and reservoirs. Additionally, only two assays were evaluated, and other genes with repeat sequences-such as those encoding ankyrin repeat-containing proteins, patatin-like phospoholipases were not included for comparison with sca2. Finally, rickettsial target gene copy number determined by sca2 and ompB were calculated only from qPCR-positive samples, and thus do not represent all patients who tested positive by the gold standard method (IFA).

Conclusion

We optimized a qPCR targeting sca2 gene, which contains repetitive sequences for diagnosing R. typhi infection in humans. The assay is specific to R. typhi and does not cross-react with other Rickettsia species or a panel of other bacteria. In vitro studies using plasmid standards and bacteria spiked into human blood showed that the sca2 assay had a limit of detection approximately 10-fold lower than that of ompB, the current commonly used qPCR target for R. typhi detection. This finding was supported by the sensitivity and specificity testing using patients’ stored buffy coat samples. Moreover, bacteria quantification using sca2 yielded approximately 2.9 log higher values compared to ompB assay. Overall, the qPCR assay targeting sca2 is a promising tool for diagnosis R. typhi in patients, who typically have low bacterial loads.

Future work will focus on optimizing the sca2 assay for different sample types, including vectors and reservoirs, to support surveillance studies, as well as validating the assay with a larger set of clinical samples. We will also investigate other target genes containing repetitive sequences and compare their performance with sca2 and ompB. Finally, we aim to use the selected target to develop a CRISPR-Cas–based lateral flow diagnostic assay and validate it with prospective patient samples.

Supporting information

S1 Table. List of stored buffy coat samples for sensitivity and specificity testing.

Buffy coat samples with confirmed rickettsial infection by at least one method from culture or indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) or Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) or qPCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014004.s001

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Schematic of the sca2 gene structure containing four regions containing repetitive sequences (green, yellow and blue) and the binding site of specific primer.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014004.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Gel electrophoresis analysis of DNA from sixteen laboratory strains of R. typhi and other bacteria using sca2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014004.s003

(DOCX)

S1 Data. Dataset.

Raw data supporting the findings of this study. This dataset contains raw qPCR Ct values for sca2 and ompB, IFA titres (IgM and IgG) for patients confirmed by IFA, Ct values from spiked blood experiments, and bacterial loads measured by sca2 and ompB. Each type of data is provided in separate sheet within Excel file.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014004.s004

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the director and staff of the Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, and the patients and staff who participated to earlier studies.

References

  1. 1. Civen R, Ngo V. Murine typhus: an unrecognized suburban vectorborne disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(6):913–8. pmid:18260783
  2. 2. Mayxay M, Castonguay-Vanier J, Chansamouth V, Dubot-Pérès A, Paris DH, Phetsouvanh R, et al. Causes of non-malarial fever in Laos: a prospective study. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(1):e46-54. pmid:24748368
  3. 3. Doppler JF, Newton PN. A systematic review of the untreated mortality of murine typhus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(9):e0008641. pmid:32925913
  4. 4. Lokida D, Sudarmono P, Kosasih H, Butar-Butar DP, Salim G, Antonjaya U, et al. Comparison of commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescence assay for diagnosis of acute Rickettsia typhi infections. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020;20(2):93–9. pmid:31448989
  5. 5. Dhawan S, Robinson MT, Stenos J, Graves SR, Wangrangsimakul T, Newton PN, et al. Selection of Diagnostic Cutoffs for Murine Typhus IgM and IgG Immunofluorescence Assay: A Systematic Review. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(1):55–63. pmid:32274984
  6. 6. Phetsouvanh R, Thojaikong T, Phoumin P, Sibounheuang B, Phommasone K, Chansamouth V, et al. Inter- and intra-operator variability in the reading of indirect immunofluorescence assays for the serological diagnosis of scrub typhus and murine typhus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88(5):932–6. pmid:23478577
  7. 7. Papp S, Rauch J, Kuehl S, Richardt U, Keller C, Osterloh A. Comparative evaluation of two Rickettsia typhi-specific quantitative real-time PCRs for research and diagnostic purposes. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2017;206(1):41–51. pmid:27696011
  8. 8. Henry KM, Jiang J, Rozmajzl PJ, Azad AF, Macaluso KR, Richards AL. Development of quantitative real-time PCR assays to detect Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis, the causative agents of murine typhus and flea-borne spotted fever. Mol Cell Probes. 2007;21(1):17–23. pmid:16893625
  9. 9. Dittrich S, Castonguay-Vanier J, Moore CE, Thongyoo N, Newton PN, Paris DH. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for Rickettsia typhi (the causal agent of murine typhus): problems with diagnosis at the limit of detection. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(3):832–8. pmid:24371248
  10. 10. Chao C-C, Belinskaya T, Zhang Z, Jiang L, Ching W-M. Assessment of a sensitive qPCR assay targeting a multiple-copy gene to detect Orientia tsutsugamushi DNA. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019;4(3):113. pmid:31370347
  11. 11. Sears KT, Ceraul SM, Gillespie JJ, Allen ED Jr, Popov VL, Ammerman NC, et al. Surface proteome analysis and characterization of surface cell antigen (Sca) or autotransporter family of Rickettsia typhi. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(8):e1002856. pmid:22912578
  12. 12. Cardwell MM, Martinez JJ. The Sca2 autotransporter protein from Rickettsia conorii is sufficient to mediate adherence to and invasion of cultured mammalian cells. Infect Immun. 2009;77(12):5272–80. pmid:19805531
  13. 13. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(2):573–80. pmid:9862982
  14. 14. Farell EM, Alexandre G. Bovine serum albumin further enhances the effects of organic solvents on increased yield of polymerase chain reaction of GC-rich templates. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:257. pmid:22624992
  15. 15. Kreader CA. Relief of amplification inhibition in PCR with bovine serum albumin or T4 gene 32 protein. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(3):1102–6. pmid:8975603
  16. 16. Ammerman NC, Beier-Sexton M, Azad AF. Laboratory maintenance of Rickettsia rickettsii. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2008;Chapter 3:Unit 3A.5. pmid:19016440
  17. 17. Thompson TA, Touré MB, Sanogo D, Shaffer JG, Doumbia SO, Krogstad DJ. Template copy number and the sensitivity of quantitative PCR for Plasmodium falciparum in asymptomatic individuals. Malar J. 2020;19(1):295. pmid:32811534
  18. 18. McLeod MP, Qin X, Karpathy SE, Gioia J, Highlander SK, Fox GE, et al. Complete genome sequence of Rickettsia typhi and comparison with sequences of other rickettsiae. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(17):5842–55. pmid:15317790
  19. 19. Robinson MT, Satjanadumrong J, Hughes T, Stenos J, Blacksell SD. Diagnosis of spotted fever group Rickettsia infections: the Asian perspective. Epidemiol Infect. 2019;147:e286. pmid:31587667
  20. 20. Gangisetty O, Reddy DS. The optimization of TaqMan real-time RT-PCR assay for transcriptional profiling of GABA-A receptor subunit plasticity. J Neurosci Methods. 2009;181(1):58–66. pmid:19406150
  21. 21. Ma Y, Zheng M. Improved PCR by the use of disruptors, a new class of Oligonucleotide reagents. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2967:159–71. pmid:37608110
  22. 22. Mann T, Humbert R, Dorschner M, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Noble WS. A thermodynamic approach to PCR primer design. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(13):e95. pmid:19528077
  23. 23. French DJ, Howard RL, Gale N, Brown T, McDowell DG, Debenham PG. Interrogation of short tandem repeats using fluorescent probes and melting curve analysis: a step towards rapid DNA identity screening. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008;2(4):333–9. pmid:19083844
  24. 24. Hotta K, Zhu CB, Phomsuwansiri P, Ishikawa J, Mizuno S, Hatsu M, et al. PCR inhibition assay for DNA-targeted antibiotics. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1995;48(11):1267–72. pmid:8557567
  25. 25. Marion E, Ganlonon L, Claco E, Blanchard S, Kempf M, Adeye A, et al. Establishment of quantitative PCR (qPCR) and culture laboratory facilities in a field hospital in benin: 1-year results. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(12):4398–400. pmid:25320228
  26. 26. Driscoll AJ, Deloria Knoll M, Hammitt LL, Baggett HC, Brooks WA, Feikin DR, et al. The effect of antibiotic exposure and specimen volume on the detection of bacterial pathogens in children with pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(suppl_3):S368–77. pmid:28575366
  27. 27. Fabri LV, Azzopardi KI, Osowicki J, Frost HR, Smeesters PR, Steer AC. An emm-type specific qPCR to track bacterial load during experimental human Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):463. pmid:34020607