Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Distribution of nematophagous fungi and soil-transmitted helminths in outdoor built environments across Latin America

  • Rojelio Mejia ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    rojelio.mejia@bcm.edu

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics – Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Eva Mereles Aranda,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centro de Investigaciones Medicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional Del Este, Paraguay

  • Leticia Ojeda,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Centro de Investigaciones Medicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional Del Este, Paraguay

  • Sandra Ocampos Benedetti,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Centro de Investigaciones Medicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional Del Este, Paraguay

  • Janitzio J. Guzman,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medicine – Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Barton Slatko,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics – Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Cristina Almazan,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Universidad Nacional de Salta, Facultad Regional Orán, Instituto de Investigaciones de Enfermedades Tropicales (IIET-CONICET), Orán, Salta, Argentina

  • Melisa Diaz-Fernandez,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Universidad Nacional de Salta, Facultad Regional Orán, Instituto de Investigaciones de Enfermedades Tropicales (IIET-CONICET), Orán, Salta, Argentina

  • Ruben Cimino,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Universidad Nacional de Salta, Facultad Regional Orán, Instituto de Investigaciones de Enfermedades Tropicales (IIET-CONICET), Orán, Salta, Argentina

  • Marisa Juarez,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Universidad Nacional de Salta, Facultad Regional Orán, Instituto de Investigaciones de Enfermedades Tropicales (IIET-CONICET), Orán, Salta, Argentina

  • Natalia Montellano Duran,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliation Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología (BIOCEN), Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia

  • Estefania Lorena Mansilla Flores,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Ingeniería en Biotecnología, Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia

  • Paola Andrea Vargas,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología (BIOCEN), Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia

  • Amandeep Kaur,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics – Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Nestor L. Uzcategui,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics – Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Lucia Estela Mejia,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics – Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Katherine Elizabeth Keegan,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics – Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Emilio Rey Mejia,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Robert Turner College and Career High School, Pearland, Texas, United States of America

  • Chiara Cássia Oliveira Amorim,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

  • Stefan M. Geiger,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliation Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

  • Ricardo T. Fujiwara,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliation Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

  • Luz Marina Llangarí-Arizo,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliations Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador UIDE, Ecuador, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador UIDE, Ecuador

  • Andrea Lopez,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador UIDE, Ecuador

  • Natalia Romero-Sandoval,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliations Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador UIDE, Ecuador, Grups de Recerca d’America i Africa Llatines-GRAAL,

  • Irene Guadalupe,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation IESS Hospital, Puyo, Pastaza Province, Ecuador

  • Liliana E. Villanueva-Lizama,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales “Dr. Hideyo Noguchi”, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México

  • Julio Vladimir Cruz-Chan,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales “Dr. Hideyo Noguchi”, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México

  • Maritza Dalí Camones Rivera,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán, Huánuco, Peru

  • Eddyson Montalvo Sabino,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Instituto de Investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza, Amazonas, Perú

  • Carlos Pineda,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán, Huánuco, Peru

  • Eric J. Wetzel,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliation Department of Biology, and Global Health Initiative, Wabash College, Crawfordsville, Indiana, United States of America

  •  [ ... ],
  • Philip J. Cooper

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador UIDE, Ecuador, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Abstract

Background

Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) are among the most common global parasitic infections, represent a significant worldwide public health burden, and remain a source of considerable morbidity in Latin America. Nematophagous fungi (NF), such as Arthrobotrys oligospora, naturally inhabit many soil types and are known for their ability to trap and kill nematodes using specialized hyphal structures or secreted enzymes and metabolites. As they prey on different developmental stages of helminths in soil, they may represent an ecological factor influencing helminth persistence and transmission dynamics.

Methods

Using an in vitro test, Toxocara cati eggs were exposed to A. oligospora. By using a flotation, filtration, and bead-beating disruption technique, parasite and fungal DNA were collected and detected by multi-parallel real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). Similar methods were used to extract DNA from soil samples outside built environments across seven Latin American countries, including Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay, and Peru.

Results

In vitro testing showed a 40.1% reduction in viable eggs in the presence of A. oligospora, as determined by qPCR (P = 0.0212). Comparing the impact of A. oligospora on T. cati over 14 days revealed a decrease in T. cati DNA concentration compared to control groups (P = 0.0039). Using qPCR to detect A. oligospora, there was a 62.4% decrease in the mean A. oligospora DNA at 14 days. The co-occurrence of NF and STH was evaluated in 805 soil samples from seven Latin American countries representing distinct geoclimatic settings. We observed a significant reduction in helminth abundance (P < 0.05), including Ascaris, Strongyloides, Toxocara, and any helminth.

Conclusion/significance

The ubiquitous presence of A. oligospora in soils and inverse association with STH parasite detection suggest a potential role in environmental helminth transmission patterns.

Author summary

Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) remain a major cause of illness in many regions because their eggs and larvae remain viable in soil, continually driving reinfection. Current human treatment alone cannot interrupt this cycle. We evaluated Arthrobotrys oligospora, a nematophagous fungus naturally present in soil, to better understand its interactions with STH in environmental settings. In vitro, the fungus reduced helminth DNA concentrations, and its presence was detected in soils from seven Latin American countries. The fungus grows toward and penetrates parasites, including Ascaris, Strongyloides, and Toxocara. Its natural presence in soils in outdoor built environments was associated with decreased STH detection. These findings suggest that soil-dwelling nematophagous fungi may represent an ecological factor influencing environmental helminth persistence and transmission dynamics.

Introduction

As major human pathogens worldwide, soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are estimated to affect over 1.5 billion people, mainly in populations living in poverty and with inadequate access to healthcare [1,2]. STH parasites include an adult intestinal stage, with viable eggs released into the environment upon host defecation. In areas of poor sanitation, these eggs reside in the soil and embryonate after several weeks. Individual infection can occur through two main routes: most commonly, by ingestion of eggs through play (usually by children), or by other direct and indirect oral contact with contaminated soil. In the case of hookworms and Strongyloides, larvae can also hatch in the soil and penetrate the skin, often after walking on contaminated soil. Without treatments, the infections can lead to severe morbidity, including colitis, anemia, malnutrition, and, in children, delays in growth and cognitive development [3,4].

It has become clear that traditional approaches addressing human and animal infection, focusing on administering anti-parasitic treatments and chemical treatments of soils, are inadequate, due to several challenges: insufficient coverage and compliance with treatments; development of drug resistance [5]; reinfection due to persistent environmental reservoirs of infective eggs; anti-parasitic drugs do not affect eggs or larvae in soil. An alternative perspective is to examine natural biological interactions that influence the persistence of parasite stages within soil environments [6].

The association for STH intervention with Nematophagous fungi (NF) should consider toxocariasis, as it poses a significant hazard to human and animal health, causing severe morbidity, including eosinophilia, asthma, colitis, visual or neuropathology due to larval migrations, malnutrition, iron deficiency, stunting, and, in children, delays in physical and cognitive development [79]. As the life cycle persists through reinfection via contaminated soil, repeated treatments with anti-parasitic drugs designed to kill adult worms are required. Throughout Latin America, Toxocara prevalence in outdoor built areas is high, with reports of 50% to 100% in public parks [10].

One such unique association employs NF species that have evolved to use nematodes in the environment as a food source [11]. NF isolated from agricultural fields, forests, and compost soils has a history of use as agents for reducing plant and veterinary animal parasitic nematodes [1118]. However, their ecological role in STH transmission dynamics has not been systematically explored. As native soil organisms that act independently of host treatment or behavior, NF are well-suited for studying environmental influences on parasite persistence.

One common NF species is Arthrobotrys oligospora, one of the first NFs to be recognized [11,19]. While A. oligospora primarily uses nematode trap formation to capture and inactivate nematode eggs, along with other NF species, it uses at least one of 4 main mechanisms: nematode trapping using hyphae, spore-based endoparasitic activity, invasion of eggs or larvae, or toxin secretion before invasion. Much is known about the diversity, taxonomy, biology, and ecology of NF, and the molecular/biochemical mechanisms of NF are under active investigation [20,21]. For this pilot project only A. oligospora was evaluated.

We aimed first to confirm previous experiments to evaluate and quantify the effect of NF on the commonly found STH, Toxocara cati, and, secondly, to confirm and extend these observations by assaying NF activity in soil samples from seven Latin American countries. We utilized the commonly found NF species, Arthrobotrys oligospora [22]. The results of this study highlight the potential importance of ecological processes in shaping STH transmission dynamics in soil. These findings support a broader understanding of how naturally occurring environmental organisms may influence helminth persistence outside the host and underscore the value of incorporating environmental biological interactions into models of parasite transmission.

Methods

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No human subjects were enrolled in this environmental study, and no Ethics Committee approval was required. Residents of the homes were invited to join the study and granted permission to collect soil samples.

Biological samples

Arthrobotrys oligospora obtained from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA; strain 24927). Primer-specific qPCR verified that A. oligospora had been grown on yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) plates before use. A. oligospora inoculum was transferred and cultured using sterile technique, in a liquid buffered glycerol-complex medium (BMGY), inoculated and grown at 25°C. Helminth eggs include Toxocara cati that were collected from infected cats’ feces. Toxocara-infected feces were collected from infected cats participating in ongoing research studies and stored at 4°C. Animal feces are weighed and suspended in Feca-Med (Vedco, Inc., St. Joseph, MO) containing Sodium Nitrate (specific gravity 1.3). After agitation and centrifugation, the liquid layer was filtered to retain Toxocara eggs. These were counted by Counting Chamber (Advanced Equine Products, Issaquah, WA) and used for soil studies.

Latin America multi-country sampling of built environments

A total of 805 soil samples from 218 external built environments in seven Latin American countries were sampled for STH, Toxocara species, and A. oligospora. Countries included are Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Mexico [23], Paraguay, and Peru [24] (Table 1). Samples were collected from 1 cm deep surface scrapings, and soil was stored at 4°C before processing. Built-environment locations were selected from prior community health campaigns in resource-limited settings. All dirt samples were collected outside participants’ houses, including the entrance, latrine, and patio, except for 45 samples from seven city parks in Huánuco, Peru [24]. These locations are in resource-poor areas throughout Latin America, with outdoor latrines and limited access to proper sanitation. Latrines were limited-service latrines on the Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) sanitation ladder, about 2 – 5 meters from the house’s entrance. Permission was obtained from tenants and local Public Health officials.

thumbnail
Table 1. Environmental Sampling and the number of samples for each Latin American country. Ecosystem map in S1 Fig.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.t001

DNA isolations

The DNA concentration technique uses parasite flotation and filtration to concentrate parasite DNA from experimental and control soil samples before DNA extraction, as previously described [24]. All DNA extraction was performed at each field site and varied as reported. Briefly, Phosphate-buffered saline (Alfa Asesar, Ward Hill, MA) with 0.05% TWEEN (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added to a 50 mL tube containing approximately 25 g of soil sample. Samples were weighed and recorded. The samples were vortexed for 5 minutes using a Tornado II portable paint shaker with a 115-volt motor (Blair Equipment Company, Swartz Creek, MI), then centrifuged at 500 g for 5 minutes, and the supernatant containing the debris was discarded. To float helminth eggs and larvae, 10 mL of a 35.6% NaNO3 solution (Vedco, St. Joseph, MO) (USA, Ecuador, and Mexico) or 530 mg/mL of sugar (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Peru), with a specific gravity of 1.3 measured with a hydrometer (SP Scienceware, Wayne, NJ) and added to the pellet in each conical centrifuge tube. The solution was vortexed in a portable shaker for 5 minutes, then centrifuged for 5 minutes at 500 g. The supernatant for each sample containing the floated parasites was transferred to a filtration apparatus. The filtration apparatus consists of a 20-mL syringe fitted with a 3 µm pore nitrocellulose filter (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA), which is small enough to retain all tested parasites. The filtration apparatus was attached to a vacuum manifold, which in turn was connected to a two-stage rotary vane vacuum pump (ELITech, Puteaux, France). Filtration with a vacuum pressure as low as 25 µm Hg was performed until the eluent had passed through the filter. The MP Fast SpinKit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA) was used to extract DNA from parasites retained on a nitrocellulose filter [24]. An internal control DNA was used as an exogenous control to confirm efficient extraction [25]. Heat disruption at 90°C for 10 minutes in a dry bath incubator was followed by mechanical disruption using the MP FastPrep 24-5G disruptor (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA) at speed 6 for 40 seconds (USA, Ecuador) or a Disruptor Genie (Scientific Industries, Bohemia, NY) at 3,000 rpm for 5 minutes (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Paraguay, and Peru). All DNA eluent was stored at -20°C; information is listed in the Environmental Microbiology Minimum Information (EMMI) (S1 Table). The eluent volume was measured and collected from all seven Latin American countries, spotted onto 0.2 µm filter paper (Millipore, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), air-dried, and shipped at ambient temperature to Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Once received, DNA was extracted from the filter papers by overnight room-temperature elution using the same volume of elution buffer (MP Biomedicals).

Multi-parallel real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and primers

DNA collected was analyzed using a multi-parallel real-time quantitative PCR. For each reaction, a 7-µL mixture consisted of 5 µL TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with 900 nM each of forward and reverse primers (and FAM probe with a minor groove binder and nonfluorescent quencher (100 nM final concentration) [26]. 2 µL of extracted DNA was added to each reaction mixture. All reactions were run on a 96-well plate (except in Argentina), with a standard curve prepared using parasite plasmid or fungal genomic DNA. Each plate had a positive (plasmid) and a negative (no template) control. All DNA samples were tested with an internal control to confirm DNA presence [25]. All plates for fungus were processed on a QS7 Pro Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) in Houston, Texas, including helminths from Bolivia, Mexico, Paraguay, and Peru. In Ecuador and Brazil, the ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for parasites. In Argentina, the Chia Portable Real-time PCR (Chia Bio, Santa Clara, CA) was used in a 16-well format with two known parasite standard concentrations and two negative control wells. We used qPCR and microscopy to quantify the experimental results. Helminths tested include Ancylostoma species, Ascaris lumbricoides, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Toxocara canis, Toxocara cati, and Trichuris trichiura (S2 Table).

qPCR for A. oligospora quantification used primers as described [20].

Forward: CGG TTT GCT GTT GCA GCT TGT T

Reverse: GGT TCA CAA AGG GTT TAC CAG G

Probe: FAM -CTG TCT TCC GGT TGG TAA GC

In vitro tests of A. oligospora on T. cati eggs

For in vitro experiments, commercial all-purpose soil (Garden Soil, Miracle-Gro, Marysville, OH) was spread on petri plates (approximately 25 g). A. oligospora was cultured in BMGY at 25°C with agitation until an optical density of 0.5 at 600nm, as measured by an Epoch plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). Plates were then incubated at 25°C for 5 days before the addition of T. cati eggs. For all in vitro experiments, 1 mL of A. oligospora and 3,000 T. cati eggs were used per plate.

Statistical analysis

One-way and two-way ANOVA were used for in vitro testing, along with Mann-Whitney tests and log10 transformations for two-way ANOVA. For the Latin American soil samples, odds ratios were calculated using either the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Any value P < 0.05 was considered significant. Calculations and graphing were performed using GraphPad Prism V.10.6.1 (San Diego, CA).

Results

In vitro experiments

In vitro experiments were first performed to confirm and quantify the activity of A. oligospora, using T. cati eggs. Microscopy visualized fungal predation on Toxocara cati eggs, and qPCR confirmed the complete reduction of Toxocara DNA on YPD plates. Control plates contained no fungus. There was no visible interaction between the fungus and T. cati eggs at the start of the experiment (Fig 1.1). At 4 hours, fungal hyphae were seen growing towards each T. cati egg within proximity of the fungus (Fig 1.2). After 2 days, fungal penetration was observed (Fig 1.3). The control plates had larval hatching at day 2 (Fig 1.4).

thumbnail
Fig 1. A. oligospora grows towards and invades T. catti. 1) 7 days of fungal growth and initial addition of T. cati show no interaction. 2) After 4 hours, the fungus grows towards T. cati eggs. 3) At 2 days, fungal hyphae penetrate T. cati eggs. 4) A control shows larva and egg hatching of living T. cati eggs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.g001

In a subsequent experiment, 45 plates containing 3,000 T. cati eggs each, with and without fungus, were cultured for 9 days, with a decrease of T. cati DNA (Fig 2A) in combination with A. oligospora. The control (no added fungus) group had a median DNA value of 103.1 fg/µL. In comparison, the experimental group had a median DNA value of 61.73 fg/µL, a decrease of 41.37 fg/µL (40.1% reduction) (P = 0.0212). A follow-up 14-day study on 63 separate and individual plates of 3,000 T. cati eggs each, with A. oligospora added to 33 plates. DNA was subsequently isolated from experimental and control plates (no fungus added) on days 0, 3, 7, 9, 11, and 14. Using two-way ANOVA with log10-transformed T. cati DNA concentration as the outcome, there was a significant effect of fungus on T. cati DNA (P = 0.0039), some evidence of a time trend (P = 0.0654), but no treatment-time interaction (P = 0.8928) (Fig 2B).

thumbnail
Fig 2. A. The presence of A. oligospora significantly reduced T. cati DNA levels.

B. Besides, at day 0, A. oligospora significantly decreased the concentration of T. cati (Exp = Experiment).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.g002

Fungal testing in soil

The same T. cati plates (Fig 2B) were also tested for the presence and quantity of A. oligospora DNA. DNA was detected in all spiked experimental samples, with decreasing concentrations of A. oligospora DNA over time, indicating transient soil colonization, likely due to the natural life span of fungi in soil. There was a 62.4% decrease in the mean A. oligospora DNA at 14 days, although using a log10-transformed two-way ANOVA was not significant for A. oligospora over time (P = 0.3422) (Fig 3). Even with a reduction in fungal DNA, there was a consistent decrease in T. cati DNA compared to the paired control group (Fig 2B). Several control samples also naturally contained A. oligospora DNA present in the added soil. As a proof-of-principle test, control samples that contained A. oligospora DNA were removed from the in vitro analysis. The two-way ANOVA with log 10-transformed T. cati DNA remained significant on the impact of fungus on T. cati DNA (P = 0.0148) and no significance on time (P = 0.5318) or interaction (P = 0.3096) (S2 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 3. A. oligospora DNA can be detected in all spiked experimental samples with decreasing concentration of DNA over time.

There is a 62.4% decrease in the mean DNA at 14 days (P = 0.3422). Several control samples naturally contained A. oligospora DNA (Exp = experiment).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.g003

Soil testing from seven Latin American Countries

Soil sampling for STH and A. oligospora was conducted at sites in seven Latin American countries (Table 1) (S1 Fig). The results on contamination rates per sample and per built environment, including the mean and range of organism DNA concentrations, showed a wide range across countries (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Prevalence of parasites and DNA concentrations in the soil.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.t002

The overall occurrence of parasites and A. oligospora per kg soil across all seven countries showed a large range between helminths and A. oligospora (Fig 4). Individual country data is presented in (S3 Fig). No comparisons between parasite DNA (fg/µl per kg soil) are possible, since the qPCR DNA sequence targets are from different regions on the helminth genomes and cannot be adequately compared across organisms.

thumbnail
Fig 4. The combined helminths and A. oligospora DNA concentrations across all seven countries.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.g004

Odds ratios and confidence intervals estimate the strength of the association between qualitative detection of A. oligospora DNA and that of individual STH parasites. A. oligospora was present in 7.4% (5.4 to 11.7%) of samples in all countries combined. When present, the odds ratio analysis shows reduced detection of Ascaris, Strongyloides, and Toxocara species. In toto, pooled data show a reduction across all helminths (Table 2). Combining all seven country data, A. oligospora was protective against Ascaris (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11–0.51, P < 0.0001), Strongyloides (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18–1.0, P = 0.03), T. cati (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.061–0.74, P = 0.042), and Toxocara species (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.93, P = 0.02) A composite “any helminth” outcome also showed significant protection (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24–0.71, P = 0.0015). Overall, the presence of Arthrobotrys oligospora was associated with a decrease in the detection of STH parasites (Table 3) (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Table 3. The odds of detecting A. oligospora DNA but not helminth DNA across all seven Latin American countries combined. Chi-square analysis was used for Ascaris, Strongyloides, Toxocara species, and any helminth. Fisher’s exact test was used for Ancylostoma, Necator, Toxocara canis/cati, and Trichuris.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.t003

thumbnail
Fig 5. The presence of A. oligospora DNA in soil samples was associated with a decrease in helminths throughout all seven countries.

In comparison to the lack of A. oligospora DNA in increased helminth numbers. The only significant differences were in Argentina (Trichuris trichiura), Ecuador (Strongyloides stercoralis, Toxocara species, and any helminth).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.g005

Discussion

Nematophagous fungi have been suggested as biologically active organisms affecting plant and animal parasitic nematodes [27]. This exploratory study, which included in vitro analysis in a controlled laboratory setting complemented by field observations from seven Latin American locations, showed an inverse association between A. oligospora and STH – the presence of A. oligospora was consistently associated with lower helminth detection rates. Significant associations with Ascaris, Strongyloides, and Toxocara suggest that NF may represent an ecologically relevant factor influencing environmental helminth persistence and transmission.

This study represents a wide variety of ecosystems and climate regions across seven Latin American countries that are endemic for parasitic infections in humans and animals [3,2833] (Table 1, S1 Fig). The life cycles of these STHs depend on soil type, environment, and climate. These include temperature, humidity, soil moisture, and outdoor temperatures. Also, the lack of proper sanitation in these endemic regions, including the use of outdoor latrines or open-air defecation, likely augments the environmental reservoir of STH and increases the risk of transmission. In 2020, 23.1% of people worldwide had limited access to proper sanitation, indicating that almost 1 in 4 people are at risk of STH infections [34].

The original studies on NFs focused on helminth larvae and described a fungal lattice network that would entrap them [35]. Although recent studies also explore the penetration and digestion of helminth eggs [19]. Interestingly, a series of A. oligospora G protein-coupled receptors has been described that may sense helminth pheromones, thereby directing fungal growth towards the helminths [36]. These findings can be applied to our in vitro studies, in which A. oligospora grows towards and penetrates T. cati (Fig 1).

Our study describes the impact of A. oligospora on several helminths. It shows by association that both fecal-oral and dermal penetration of helminths can be reduced in the presence of NF. By association, these findings were consistent in all seven Latin American countries. In Ecuador, Ascaris levels were comparable between A. oligospora–positive and –negative samples (Fig 5). The observed statistical significance was driven primarily by the disproportionate number of Ascaris-negative samples in the A. oligospora–absent group (88) compared with the present group [3].

Interestingly, the helminths (Necator and Strongyloides) were found in the A. oligospora positive group in Paraguay, likely due to the low prevalence of helminths in Paraguay’s specific ecosystem, and not found in the A. oligospora negative group (Fig 5).

The limitations of our study include a relatively small sample size within individual countries, which can skew comparisons; however, when combined, we did detect a significant impact of NF on helminths. Another limitation is that we are detecting parasite and NF DNA that can come from dead organisms and do not represent active killing of helminths. However, all soil samples were floated and then filtered, which should have allowed only intact eggs/larvae to survive, reducing the quantity of dead helminths for DNA extraction. Another limitation is how the samples were processed, which may decrease the helminth DNA detected by qPCR, since the NF is known to encage helminth eggs/larvae and could remove STH during extraction. However, significant mixing and soil washing should break up any NF-induced entrapment of helminths. There is also potential cross-reactivity with other helminth non-human pathogens. Many helminth species share nearly identical DNA sequences, even in the target regions of our primer/probe sets (S2 Table). Species such as Ascaris ovis, Strongyloides ratti, Trichuris vulpis, and others can also contaminate outdoor built environments accessible to feral animals. While cross-reactivity can occur, our study takes a one-health approach to the NF’s impact on decreasing helminth infections in humans and animals. In this exploratory study, we did not measure or control for relevant environmental factors, such as soil characteristics and climatic conditions, which are likely to affect STH detection across different sampling sites. Future studies will need to measure and control for such factors.

Soil-transmitted helminths persist in many regions due to the inherent biology of soil-based reinfection, along with barriers related to healthcare access, treatment adherence, and diagnostic limitations [37]. In addition, poverty and inadequate sanitation in endemic settings contribute to continued environmental contamination and reinfection cycles [38]. As such, our results suggest that NF A. oligospora is an ecologically relevant soil organism associated with reduced helminth burdens in environmental samples. We also show that Arthrobotrys oligospora NF is a naturally occurring soil component present in household soils where STH are present and is inversely correlated with STH contamination across diverse geographic regions, suggesting it is frequently present when parasite burdens are reduced or absent.

Conclusions

In this exploratory study, we detected NF in soil samples from seven Latin American locations and provided evidence of an inverse association between NF and STH DNA. Further research will be required to examine the effects of soil composition and climate variation on NF activity and investigate how interactions between NF and STH may affect transmission dynamics and human exposure pathways. Longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the persistence of NF in soils, spatial-temporal variability, and their role within broader environmental transmission systems.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Ecosystems and regions for seven Latin American countries.

Details are in Table 1 (World Terrestrial Ecosystems retrieved December 8, 2025 using ArcGIS Online by Environmental Systems Research Institute, https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?layers=926a206393ec40a590d8caf29ae9a93e).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.s001

(TIFF)

S1 Table. Environmental Microbiology Minimum Information (EMMI) for qPCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Helminth target regions, primer sequences, and probe sequences for helminths for DNA amplification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.s003

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Toxocara concentrations after removing the Control samples that contained Arthrobotrys oligospora.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.s004

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Parasite DNA concentration per Kg of soil across seven Latin American countries.

Values in Table 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.s005

(TIFF)

S3 Table. Odds ratios of helminths and A. oligospora in each Latin American country.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013990.s006

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the study participants from all Latin American countries for welcoming us into their homes.

References

  1. 1. Chen J, Gong Y, Chen Q, Li S, Zhou Y. Global burden of soil-transmitted helminth infections, 1990-2021. Infect Dis Poverty. 2024;13(1):77.
  2. 2. Loukas A, Maizels RM, Hotez PJ. The yin and yang of human soil-transmitted helminth infections. Int J Parasitol. 2021;51(13–14):1243–53. pmid:34774540
  3. 3. Mejia R, Chis Ster I, Chico ME, Guadalupe I, Arévalo-Cortés A, Lopez A, et al. Epidemiology of intestinal parasite infections and multiparasitism and their impact on growth and hemoglobin levels during childhood in tropical Ecuador: A longitudinal study using molecular detection methods. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025;19(6):e0013004. pmid:40523039
  4. 4. Pabalan N, Singian E, Tabangay L, Jarjanazi H, Boivin MJ, Ezeamama AE. Soil-transmitted helminth infection, loss of education and cognitive impairment in school-aged children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(1):e0005523. pmid:29329288
  5. 5. Ng’etich AI, Amoah ID, Bux F, Kumari S. Anthelmintic resistance in soil-transmitted helminths: One-Health considerations. Parasitol Res. 2023;123(1):62. pmid:38114766
  6. 6. Freeman MC, Akogun O, Belizario V Jr, Brooker SJ, Gyorkos TW, Imtiaz R, et al. Challenges and opportunities for control and elimination of soil-transmitted helminth infection beyond 2020. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(4):e0007201. pmid:30973872
  7. 7. Khozime A, Mirsadraee M, Borji H. Toxocara sero-prevalence and its relationship with allergic asthma in asthmatic patients in north-eastern Iran. J Helminthol. 2019;93(6):677–80. pmid:30270820
  8. 8. Fan C-K. Pathogenesis of cerebral toxocariasis and neurodegenerative diseases. Adv Parasitol. 2020;109:233–59. pmid:32381200
  9. 9. Fan CK, Holland CV, Loxton K, Barghouth U. Cerebral Toxocariasis: Silent Progression to Neurodegenerative Disorders? Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):663–86.
  10. 10. Bonilla-Aldana DK, Morales-Garcia LV, Ulloque Badaracco JR, Mosquera-Rojas MD, Alarcón-Braga EA, Hernandez-Bustamante EA, et al. Prevalence of Toxocara eggs in Latin American parks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infez Med. 2023;31(3):329–49. pmid:37701393
  11. 11. Wang D, Ma N, Rao W, Zhang Y. Recent advances in life history transition with nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora and its application in sustainable agriculture. Pathogens. 2023;12(3).
  12. 12. Braga FR, de Araújo JV. Nematophagous fungi for biological control of gastrointestinal nematodes in domestic animals. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(1):71–82. pmid:24265027
  13. 13. da Silveira WF, Braga FR, de Oliveira Tavela A, Dos Santos LF, Domingues RR, Aguiar AR, et al. Nematophagous fungi combinations reduce free-living stages of sheep gastrointestinal nematodes in the field. J Invertebr Pathol. 2017;150:1–5. pmid:28859879
  14. 14. Braga FR, Soares FEF, Giuberti TZ, Lopes ADCG, Lacerda T, Ayupe T de H, et al. Nematocidal activity of extracellular enzymes produced by the nematophagous fungus Duddingtonia flagrans on cyathostomin infective larvae. Vet Parasitol. 2015;212(3–4):214–8. pmid:26319197
  15. 15. Soares FEF, Braga FR, Araújo JV, Geniêr HLA, Gouveia AS, Queiroz JH. Nematicidal activity of three novel extracellular proteases of the nematophagous fungus Monacrosporium sinense. Parasitol Res. 2013;112(4):1557–65. pmid:23371498
  16. 16. Doolotkeldieva T, Bobushova S, Muratbekova A, Schuster C, Leclerque A. Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of the Nematophagous Fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora from Kyrgyzstan. Acta Parasitol. 2021;66(4):1349–65. pmid:34021467
  17. 17. Soares FE de F, Aguilar-Marcelino L, Braga FR. Editorial: Nematophagous fungi as nematode control agents. Front Fungal Biol. 2024;4:1353132. pmid:38298859
  18. 18. de Hollanda Ayupe T, Monteiro TSA, Braga FR, de Freitas Soares FE, de Mello INK, Araujo JM, et al. Assessment of compatibility between the nematophagous fungi Arthrobotrys robusta and Duddingtonia flagrans under laboratory conditions. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2016;33(2):129–30. pmid:26631950
  19. 19. Vidal-Diez de Ulzurrun G, Hsueh Y-P. Predator-prey interactions of nematode-trapping fungi and nematodes: both sides of the coin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(9):3939–49. pmid:29523933
  20. 20. Pathak E, El-Borai FE, Campos-Herrera R, Johnson EG, Stuart RJ, Graham JH, et al. Use of real-time PCR to discriminate parasitic and saprophagous behaviour by nematophagous fungi. Fungal Biol. 2012;116(5):563–73. pmid:22559917
  21. 21. Araujo JV, Fonseca JDS, Barbosa BB, Valverde HA, Santos HA, Braga FR. The Role of Helminthophagous Fungi in the Biological Control of Human and Zoonotic Intestinal Helminths. Pathogens. 2024;13(9).
  22. 22. Anderson IC, Cairney JWG. Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities: increased understanding through the application of molecular techniques. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6(8):769–79. pmid:15250879
  23. 23. Villanueva-Lizama LE, Cruz-Coral A, Teh-Poot C, Cruz-Chan JV, Mejia R. Detection of Parasite DNA in Soil Samples from Rural Yucatan, Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024;112(2):304–6. pmid:39626272
  24. 24. Pineda C, Camones Rivera MD, Montalva Sabino E, Mejia LE, Keegan KE, Alvarez LPP, et al. Parasite contamination of soil in different Peruvian locations and outside built environments. Parasit Vectors. 2025;18(1):134. pmid:40188091
  25. 25. Deer DM, Lampel KA, González-Escalona N. A versatile internal control for use as DNA in real-time PCR and as RNA in real-time reverse transcription PCR assays. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;50(4):366–72. pmid:20149084
  26. 26. Mejia R, Seco-Hidalgo V, Garcia-Ramon D, Calderón E, Lopez A, Cooper PJ. Detection of enteric parasite DNA in household and bed dust samples: potential for infection transmission. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):141. pmid:32188497
  27. 27. Nansen P, Grønvold J, Henriksen SA, Wolstrup J. Interactions between the predacious fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora and third-stage larvae of a series of animal-parasitic nematodes. Vet Parasitol. 1988;26(3–4):329–37. pmid:3347992
  28. 28. Cimino RO, Jeun R, Juarez M, Cajal PS, Vargas P, Echazú A, et al. Identification of human intestinal parasites affecting an asymptomatic peri-urban Argentinian population using multi-parallel quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:380. pmid:26183074
  29. 29. Panti-May JA, Zonta ML, Cociancic P, Barrientos-Medina RC, Machain-Williams C, Robles MR, et al. Occurrence of intestinal parasites in Mayan children from Yucatán, Mexico. Acta Trop. 2019;195:58–61. pmid:31022382
  30. 30. Camacho-Alvarez I, Goyens P, Luizaga-López JM, Jacobs F. Geographic differences in the distribution of parasitic infections in children of Bolivia. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2021;14:e00217. pmid:34189287
  31. 31. Celestino AO, Vieira SCF, Lima PAS, Rodrigues LMCL, Lopes IRS, França CM, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Brazil: a systematic review. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021;54:e00332021. pmid:34105625
  32. 32. Servián A, Garimano N, Santini MS. Systematic review and meta-analysis of soil-transmitted helminth infections in South America (2000-2024). Acta Trop. 2024;260:107400. pmid:39265755
  33. 33. Iannacone J, Osorio-Chumpitaz M, Utia-Yataco R, Alvariño-Flores L, Ayala-Sulca Y, Del Águila-Pérez CA, et al. Enteroparasitosis in Peru and its relation to the Human Development Index. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2021;59(5):368–76. pmid:34914342
  34. 34. Ando H, Kitajima M, Oki T, Murakami M. Advancements in global water and sanitation access (2000-2020). Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):6399. pmid:39984723
  35. 35. Jiang X, Xiang M, Liu X. Nematode-trapping fungi. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(1).
  36. 36. Kuo C-Y, Tay RJ, Lin H-C, Juan S-C, Vidal-Diez de Ulzurrun G, Chang Y-C, et al. The nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora detects prey pheromones via G protein-coupled receptors. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9(7):1738–51. pmid:38649409
  37. 37. Jia T-W, Melville S, Utzinger J, King CH, Zhou X-N. Soil-transmitted helminth reinfection after drug treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(5):e1621. pmid:22590656
  38. 38. Echazú A, Bonanno D, Juarez M, Cajal SP, Heredia V, Caropresi S, et al. Effect of Poor Access to Water and Sanitation As Risk Factors for Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infection: Selectiveness by the Infective Route. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(9):e0004111. pmid:26421865