Figures
Abstract
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) exhibits bactericidal, fungicidal, and virucidal effects under ultraviolet light irradiation. However, there are few reports on the photocatalytic effect of TiO2 against parasitic eggs. This study aims to preliminarily investigate the effect of TiO2 photocatalysis on the inactivation of Hymenolepis nana (H. nana) eggs. We employed the trypan blue staining method to assess the survival rate of 100 insect eggs, investigating the roles of light, TiO2 concentration, solution pH and light intensity in the process of inactivating eggs with TiO2. Morphological and structural damage to the eggs was observed using electron microscopy. The levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) within the eggs were measured using a fluorescent enzyme labeler, and the infectivity of TiO2-treated eggs was evaluated by oral-gavage in mice (8 mice per group). The results showed that under mercury lamp irradiation, with a TiO2 concentration of 1.0 mg/L, pH values ranging from 6 to 8, light intensity of 0.50 mW/cm2, and photocatalytic exposure for 2 h effectively inactivated H. nana eggs. Electron microscopy revealed that TiO2 photocatalysis caused eggs shrinkage and collapse of the spherical structure, along with the decrease number of mitochondria within the eggs. The TiO2 photocatalysis resulted in an increase in ROS content and a decrease in ATP content in eggs. These findings indicate that TiO2 photocatalysis disrupts the structural integrity and mitochondrial function of H. nana eggs by elevating ROS levels and depleting ATP, while simultaneously reducing the infection rate in mice to 12.5%. This study lays the groundwork for potential future applications of TiO2-based photoenergy-mediated inactivation of parasitic eggs in wastewater and drinking water treatment, ultimately benefiting public health.
Author summary
This study preliminarily investigated the inactivation of Hymenolepis nana (H. nana) eggs using titanium dioxide (TiO2) photocatalysis. The trypan blue staining method was used to assess eggs viability under varying conditions of light, TiO2 concentration, pH, and light intensity. Under conditions of TiO2 concentration at 1.0 mg/L, pH between 6 and 8, and light intensity at 0.50 mW/cm2, optimal inactivation effects can be achieved after 2 h of exposure to mercury lamp irradiation. Electron microscopy revealed that photocatalytic treatment caused eggs shrinkage, collapse of the spherical structure, and a reduction in mitochondrial number. Furthermore, a significant increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a decrease in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels were detected within the eggs. These findings suggest that TiO2 photocatalysis inactivates H. nana eggs by disrupting their structural integrity and mitochondrial function. This work lays a foundation for the potential application of TiO2-based technology to inactivate parasitic eggs in water treatment, offering promise for public health protection.
Citation: Mou R, Wang H, Cui X, Li X, Cheng Y, Chen W, et al. (2025) TiO2 eliminates Hymenolepis nana eggs via photocatalytic activity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 19(11): e0013715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013715
Editor: Timir Tripathi, NEHU: North Eastern Hill University, INDIA
Received: May 9, 2025; Accepted: November 3, 2025; Published: November 10, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Mou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All data generated or analyzed from this study are included in this manuscript and Supporting information.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82160398 to RM) and the Technological Innovation Talent Team of Scientific and Technological Department of Guizhou Province, China (ZDSYS[2023]004 to RM; CXTD[2022]004 to RM). Central-Guided Local Science and Technology Projects of Guizhou Province, China (Qiankehe[2025]024 to KZ). No authors receive a salary from the funders of this manuscript. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1. Introduction
Hymenolepis nana (H. nana) is a zoonotic parasitic worm that infects both humans and rodents, with adult worms primarily residing in the intestinal. Humans infection with H. nana usually cause hymenolepiasis. Mild infections of H. nana in humans have no obvious clinical symptoms, while severe infections manifest as abdominal pain, diarrhea, anemia, and fever [1,2]. H. nana has been classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a neglected zoonotic helminth [3], and it is endemic in regions such as Asia, Africa, Southern/ Eastern Europe, and Central/ South America [4]. It is estimated that 50–75 million people worldwide are infected [5,6]. The adult worms produce thousands of eggs, which are subsequently excreted into the external environment through feces [7]. Eggs that persist in untreated water, sewage, sludge, and wastewater are the primary sources of H. nana transmission [8,9]. Effective treatment of contaminated water sources is currently a key strategy for the prevention and control of infection. However, parasitic eggs possess highly resilient shells and structural components, rendering them resistant to commonly used disinfectants in wastewater treatment processes [10]. The remarkable resilience of H. nana eggs poses significant challenges for water treatment and wastewater management. Their robust outer shells confer exceptional resistance to conventional disinfection methods, enabling prolonged environmental survival and posing a major zoonotic threat.
Although sedimentation and solar disinfection are commonly used methods for treating sewage and fecal sludge, their effectiveness is limited. Parasite eggs can remain viable for extended periods in sedimentation tanks [11]. In addition, studies have shown that disinfectants used to treat parasitic eggs contamination in water can produce nitrogen-containing byproducts such as N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), which are associated with carcinogenic and teratogenic effects [12]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop innovative and more efficient disinfection methods specifically targeting worm eggs.
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is an n-type semiconductor due to the presence of oxygen vacancies, thus as electron donors in the electronic structure of TiO2 [13]. TiO2 is the most commonly used catalyst in the field of water purification [14]. The photocatalytic mechanism of TiO2 primarily involves the generation of electron-hole pairs upon excitation by ultraviolet light. These charge carriers react with water (H2O) or oxygen (O2) on the surface of the material to produce a large quantity of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH), superoxide anions (•O2⁻), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). These ROS exhibit toxicity toward microbial cell membranes, inhibit the formation of bacterial biofilms, and disrupt membrane integrity, thereby promoting oxidative damage to biomolecules such as proteins and ultimately leading to microbial death [13,15]. It has demonstrated strong inhibitory effects against Escherichia coli (E. coli), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) [16,17], and can also effectively inactivate Candida albicans in water [18]. In addition to degrading microorganisms in water, this material can also reduce the activity of viral envelope proteins and inactivate viruses when exposed to natural light, thereby preventing viral transmission [19,20]. Some studies also find that other nanoparticle composites (g-C3N4/Fe2O3, MWCNTs-CuNiFe2O4, Fe2O3/bentonite/TiO2, and MMT/CuFe2O4) exhibit certain degradation effects on ampicillin (AMP), ciprofloxacin (CIP), and amoxicillin (AMX) solutions in water through ROS [21–24]. However, there have few reports on the lethality of TiO2 against parasitic eggs, and the mechanisms by which it may exert such effects remain unclear. Unlike TiO2 and other nanomaterials widely reported in the literature for degrading organic pollutants, we shift our focus from degrading chemical molecules or microorganisms to inactivating highly environmentally resistant parasite eggs. This provides a novel strategy for TiO2 to effectively treat parasite eggs that are difficult to eliminate with conventional disinfectants.
In addition, the (001) crystal plane pure TiO2 nanosheets employed in this study offered advantages of low cost and simple preparation compared to complex composite materials. They also exhibit superior catalytic performance and adsorption capacity relative to the (101) facet of anatase TiO2, achieving excellent results at lower catalyst concentrations and light intensities [25]. This indicates greater application potential and environmental friendliness in real-world water treatment scenarios. In this study, the ovicidal effect of TiO2 on H. nana eggs through photocatalysis under mercury lamp irradiation was determined. This finding confirmed the significant ovicidal efficacy of TiO2, elucidating that ROS generated by TiO2 disrupted the structural integrity of insect eggs and played a crucial role by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction. This provides foundational data for further understanding the photocatalytic inactivation mechanisms of TiO2 against other parasitic eggs present in water.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Ethics statement
All animal experiments of the current study were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Guizhou Medical University (approval No. 2100346).
2.2. Reagents
The 0.4% (v/v) trypan blue staining solution (BL627A) and 2.5% (v/v) electron microscopy fixative (BL911A) were purchased from Biosharp (Anhui, China); 5% (v/v) NaClO standard solution was obtained from Shenzhen Fulin Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China); ATP Assay Kit (S0026) and ROS Assay Kit (S0033S) were offered by Beyotime (Shanghai, China). The 812 embedding resin (90529-77-4) and osmium tetroxide (18456) were obtained from Servicebio (Wuhan, China).
TiO2 used in this study is a TiO2 nanosheet with excellent (001) exposed facets that were synthesized by a solvothermal method with a diameter of about 220 nm. It was characterized and validated by our group with scientific literatures published elsewhere [26–28].
2.3. Assessing the survival rate of H. nana eggs by trypan blue staining
Parasitic worms were obtained from hamsters purchased at a pet market in Nanming District, Guiyang City, China. Morphological and molecular biological identification were performed to identify the parasites as H. nana [29–31]. Gravid proglottids of adult H. nana were minced using sterilized surgical scissors to release the eggs. An equal volume of eggs suspension and 0.4% (v/v) trypan blue solution was mixed at a 1:1 ratio, gently homogenized, and store at room temperature for 5 min. 100 eggs were observed and counted under a microscope and the survival rate was calculated. Viable eggs contained unstained oncospheres, while non-viable eggs exhibited blue-stained oncospheres (S1 Fig).
2.4. Establishment of the TiO2 photocatalytic reaction system
TiO2 (001) powder was placed in a 1.5 mL EP tube containing 1 mL ddH2O solvent. The powder was dispersed using an ultrasonic cell disruptor and a shaker for 30 min. The mixture was transferred to a 10 mL sterilized glass test tube. 250 μL of eggs suspension with a total number of 12,500 eggs was added, followed by additional ddH2O solvent to bring the volume to 5 mL, forming a suspension of TiO2 eggs at a specific concentration. The test tube containing the TiO2/ eggs suspension was placed in an Eight-station reactor (Yihui Analytical Instruments Co., Ltd.), where an external circulating water system insulated the hollow quartz tube. A high-pressure mercury lamp was then turned on and the light intensity was adjusted. The temperature-controlled magnetic stirrer of the reactor was set to stir at 120 rpm to ensure full contact between the TiO2 and the eggs (Fig 1A). The TiO2/ eggs suspension was collected according to the experimental time.
(A) Experimental design diagram. A test tube containing a mixture of eggs and TiO2 was placed in an Eight-station reactor, and a magnetic stirrer was activated to ensure full contact between TiO2 and the eggs, with a mercury lamp in the center, and a quartz tube outside the mercury lamp that could be connected to a water main to provide thermal insulation. (B) The effect of light/ dark conditions on the H. nana egg survival rate (%) by 0.5 mg/mL TiO2 with 0.50 mW/cm² light intensity and pH 7.0. (C) The H. nana egg survival rate (%) at different concentrated TiO2 with 0.50 mW/cm² light intensity and pH 7.0. (D) The effect of different pH values on the H. nana egg survival rate (%) by 1.0 mg/mL TiO2 with 0.50 mW/cm² light intensity. (E) The effect of different mercury lamp light intensities on the H. nana egg survival rate (%) by 1.0 mg/mL TiO2 with pH 7.0. Data are presented as mean + SD in (B-E), n = 3 per group for (B-E).
2.5. Inactivation effects of TiO2 on H. nana eggs under different conditions (light and dark, different TiO2 concentrations, different pH, and different light intensities)
For light and dark conditions: a suspension of 5 mL of 0.5 mg/mL TiO2 and 2,500/mL egg was prepared. The TiO2/ eggs suspension was placed in an Eight-station reactor and the light intensity was adjusted to 0.25 mW/cm2 to set up a photocatalytic reaction system. Meanwhile, a dark control group (dark + TiO2) and a mercury light irradiation group without TiO2 (light) were set up. For different TiO2 concentrations: a suspension containing 12,500 eggs were prepared in a final reaction volume of 5 mL with TiO2 concentrations of 0.1 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, 1.0 mg/mL and 2.0 mg/mL. The TiO2/ eggs suspension was placed in an Eight-station reactor and the light intensity was set to 0.25 mW/cm2. For different pH values: use solvents with pH values of 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 to prepare suspensions with a final volume of 5 mL, a TiO2 concentration of 1.0 mg/mL, and a concentration of 2,500 eggs/mL. Place the TiO2/ eggs suspension into an octuplex reactor and set the light intensity to 0.25 mW/cm2. For different light intensities: double distilled water was used as the reaction suspension with a TiO2 concentration of 1.0 mg/mL and an egg concentration of 2,500 eggs/mL. A mercury lamp was adjusted to light intensities of 0.25 mW/cm2, 0.50 mW/cm2, 0.75 mW/cm2, and 1.00 mW/cm2 and the TiO2/ eggs suspension was placed in an Eight-station reactor.
Samples were taken at different reaction timepoints. After trypan blue staining, the samples were observed under the microscope, and the number of viable eggs out of 100 counted eggs was recorded to calculate the egg survival rate.
2.6. Hatching experiment of H. nana eggs after TiO2 photocatalysis
The optimal incubation concentration of NaClO is 0.6% (v/v), and the detailed steps are described in the S1 Text. A suspension of 100 μL of 0.5 mg/mL TiO2 and 2,500/mL egg was photocatalyzed under a mercury lamp with a light intensity of 0.50 mW/cm2 for 2 h. Then, 400 μL of 0.6% (v/v) NaClO solution was added. Mix well and let stand for 3–5 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 10 mL of 0.85% (v/v) NaCl solution. The supernatant was centrifuged at 865 x g for 5 min, and the precipitate was washed twice with 0.85% (w/v) NaCl solution. The precipitate was resuspended with 200 μL of 0.85% (w/v) NaCl solution and 100 eggs were observed and counted under a microscope to calculate the hatching rate of the eggs.
2.7. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) observations of H. nana eggs damage
A suspension containing 12,500 eggs with PBS was treated with 0.6% (v/v) NaClO, and 1.0 mg/mL TiO2 after 2 h and 4 h of photocatalysis with the light intensity of 0.50 mW/cm2 respectively. The suspension was centrifuged at 865 x g for 5 min, the egg precipitates were collected and fixed with 2.5% (v/v) electron microscope fixative and stored at 4°C. For SEM: use a JSM-IT700HR scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) to acquire images of the samples. For TEM: use an HT7800/HT770 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan) to acquire images of the samples.
Specific procedures for SEM and TEM are described in the “S1 Text” section.
2.8. Detection of ROS and ATP in H. nana eggs
A suspension containing 12,500 eggs was taken and treated with PBS, 0.6% (v/v) NaClO, and 1.0 mg/mL TiO2 after 2 h of photocatalysis with the light intensity of 0.50 mW/cm2. The suspension was centrifuged at 865 x g for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded and the precipitate was retained. For ROS: Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) was measured at 485/ 530 nm excitation/ emission wavelengths using a SYNERGY-H4 multipurpose microplate reader (Bio-Tek, USA). After sealing the slides, used an inverted fluorescence microscope (Eclipse 80i, Nikon Ltd, Japan) to capture images. For ATP: Relative Light Unit (RLU) was measured at 485/ 530 nm excitation/ emission wavelengths using a SYNERGY-H4 multipurpose microplate reader (Bio-Tek, USA).
Specific procedures are described in the “S1 Text” section.
2.9. ICR mouse experiment
Healthy female ICR mice (6–8 weeks old, 20 ± 2 g) were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of Guizhou Medical University (SCXK (Jing) 2019–0010). Animals were kept under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions at room temperature of 20–22°C, and subjected to a controlled 12-h light/ dark cycle. All mice were given adaptive feeding for at least one week before formal experiments. Mice were randomly divided into 3 groups: infection control group (H. nana), 0.6% (v/v) NaClO treatment group (NaClO), and 1.0 mg/mL TiO2 treatment group (TiO2) after 2 h of photocatalysis with light intensity of 0.50 mW/cm2. The 500 H. nana eggs were orally administered per mouse. The body weight of each mouse was measured and recorded from the day of gavage to day 14 post-gavage.
The number of eggs per gram of feces (EPG) was calculated using the McMaster counting chamber as follows:
EPG = [(n1 + n2)/2] × [10/(0.15 x n3)], where (n1 + n2) is the total number of eggs and n3 is the weight of the feces [32].
Additionally, the mice were euthanized under anesthesia and dissected at Day 14. The number and length of the adult worms in the intestinal lumen were counted. The number of eggs, adults, and adult length in mice not infected with H. nana were defaulted to zero.
2.10. Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis and graphical representation were performed using GraphPad Prism (Version 5.0). The data were presented as mean + SD. Measurements were first subjected to normality tests, and the Homogeneity of Variance Test was performed between groups. Mann-Whitney U-test was employed as a non-parametric statistical method to analyze data that deviated from normal distribution. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test differences between multiple groups, and the Mann-Whitney U-test and t-test were used to compare differences between two groups. The p value less than 0.05 means a statistically significant difference; ns means no statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Experimental design and the killing effect of TiO2 on H. nana eggs
To explore the killing effect of TiO2 on H. nana eggs, the following methods were used (Fig 1A). Eggs were exposed to TiO2 under dark conditions (Dark + TiO2) and under mercury lamp irradiation without TiO2 (Light). No significant change in eggs survival rate was observed. However, when TiO2 photocatalysis (Light + TiO2) was applied for 2.5 h, the egg survival rate dramatically decreased to 12%, showing a significant decline, while the survival rates of eggs in the Dark + TiO2 and Light groups remained over 90% (Fig 2B). These results indicated that TiO2 required light exposure to inactivate the eggs. At a TiO2 concentration of 1.0 mg/mL, the egg mortality rate was higher than at 0.1 mg/mL, and the rate of mortality was also faster. The TiO2 concentration was increased from 1.0 mg/mL to 2.0 mg/mL did not increase the mortality rate of the eggs (Fig 2C). When eggs were exposed to solvent pH values of 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 for 1 h, the highest eggs mortality (average of 74.67%) was observed at a high pH value of 9. After 2 h of exposure, the lowest mortality (average of 86%) was observed at pH 5. However, when the exposure time exceeded 2 h, no significant effect of different pH values on eggs inactivation was observed. These results indicated that within the pH range of 6–8, changes in pH did not significantly affect egg inactivation (Fig 2D). As the light intensity increased from 0.25 mW/cm2 to 1.00 mW/cm2, the time required for complete egg death decreased. During 0–3 h of light exposure, egg survival decreased significantly with increasing light intensity, especially at 1 h of light exposure. With the increase of irradiation time, there was no significant difference in egg mortality between light intensity of 0.50 mW/cm2 and 0.75 mW/cm2 after 2–3 h (Fig 2E). The above results demonstrate that under visible light exposure, TiO2 at a concentration of 1.0 mg/L, with a light intensity of 0.50 mW/cm2, and a pH range of 6–8, effectively inactivates H. nana eggs after 2 h of photocatalytic treatment.
(A) Hatching rate (%) of H. nana eggs. (B) Survival rate (%) of oncospheres after hatching from H. nana eggs. (C) Hatching rate (%) of H. nana eggs after TiO2 treatment. Data are presented as mean + SD in (A-C), n = 6 per group for (A) and (B), n = 3 per group for (C), * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, ns: not statistically significant.
3.2. TiO2 photocatalysis reduces the hatching ability of H. nana eggs
To determine the optimal NaClO concentration for hatching H. nana eggs, we first evaluated the hatching rate and the survival rate of the oncospheres after hatching from fresh H. nana eggs treated with NaClO. The results showed that compared to the hatching rate at 0.6% v/v NaClO, there was no significant difference in the rates at 0.8% v/v and 1.0% v/v NaClO, while the hatching rates were reduced at 0.2% v/v and 0.4% v/v NaClO (Fig 2A). Similarly, compared to the survival rate of oncospheres at 0.6% v/v NaClO, there was no significant change in survival rates at 0.2% v/v to 0.6% v/v NaClO, whereas the survival rate of oncospheres decreased at 0.8% v/v and 1.0% v/v NaClO, with egg dissolution observed at 1.0% v/v NaClO (Fig 2B). These results indicated that the 0.6% v/v NaClO was optimal for hatching H. nana eggs, and therefore, 0.6% v/v NaClO was used for hatching experiments on H. nana eggs after photocatalysis. Comparing to the PBS and NaClO groups, the hatching rate of eggs subjected to TiO2 photocatalysis and then incubated with NaClO was significantly lower, with the rate dropping to below 15% after 2 h treatment (Fig 2C). The results indicate that TiO2 photocatalysis can reduce the hatching ability of H. nana eggs.
3.3. SEM observation of damage to eggs
To observe the damage to the surface ultrastructure of H. nana eggs caused by TiO2 photocatalysis, SEM was used to examine eggs treated with PBS, NaClO, and TiO2 photocatalysis for 2 h and 4 h, respectively. The results showed that PBS-treated eggs were oval-shaped, plump, with smooth surfaces and no obvious changes. There was no significant difference in eggs treated with PBS for 2 h and 4 h (Fig 3A). In contrast to PBS-treated eggs, those treated with NaClO for 2 h had a relatively regular shape, but the surface was not smooth, showing micro-depressions. After 4 h of NaClO treatment, the eggs exhibited an irregular shape with noticeable shrinkage (Fig 3B). TiO2-treated eggs for 2 h showed a reduced size, almost losing their spherical shape, with a rough surface and noticeable depressions. A large amount of TiO2 was adsorbed on the surface of the eggs. After 4 h of TiO2 treatment, the eggs were even smaller, showing obvious degeneration, shrinkage, and had completely lost their spherical shape. The surface exhibited extensive folding, and a large amount of TiO2 material was adsorbed on the surface (Fig 3C). These results indicate that both NaClO and TiO2 photocatalysis can cause damage to H. nana eggs, with TiO2 showing more noticeable damage.
(A) PBS treatment group. (B) 0.6% (v/v) NaClO treatment group. (C) 1.0 mg/mL TiO2 with 0.50 mW/cm2 light intensity treatment group. The red arrowheads indicate surface depressions, and the green arrowheads point to TiO2. For the 2 h and 4 h timepoints, the scale bars on the left panel = 10 μm, and the scale bars on the right panel = 1 μm.
3.4. TEM observation of eggs damage
To further investigate the damage to egg ultrastructure by TiO2 photocatalysis, TEM was used to observe eggs treated with PBS, NaClO, and TiO2 photocatalysis for 2 h and 4 h. The results showed the PBS-treated group after 2 h and 4 h, the egg structure remained relatively intact, with the hexacanth embryo intact and mitochondria within the embryo membrane being numerous and well-preserved (Fig 4A). In the NaClO-treated groups, after 2 h and 4 h, some damage was observed, with slight shrinkage; the hexacanth embryo remained largely intact, but the number of mitochondria in the egg membrane was reduced (Fig 4B). In the TiO2-treated groups after 2 h and 4 h, the damage was more severe, with significant shrinkage, a clear loss of the hexacanth embryo structure, and very few mitochondria within the egg membrane. No TiO2 was visible inside the eggs (Fig 4C). These results indicate that both NaClO and TiO2 can damage eggs and reduce mitochondrial quantity, but TiO2 causes more severe damage to the eggs compared to NaClO.
(A) PBS treatment group. (B) 0.6% (v/v) NaClO treatment group. (C) 1.0 mg/mL TiO2 with 0.50 mW/cm2 light intensity treatment group. The red arrowheads indicate mitochondria. For the 2 h and 4 h timepoints, the scale bars on the left panel = 5 μm, and the scale bars on the right panel = 1 μm.
3.5. Detection of mitochondrial function-related indicators in eggs
Mitochondrial abnormalities of eggs after TiO2 photocatalysis was showed via TEM, since ROS are primarily produced by mitochondria, we used the DCFH-DA green fluorescent probe to detect the ROS content inside the eggs. This dye binds with ROS inside the eggs and emits fluorescence, allowing to assess the ROS levels using Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI). Under the microscope, we observed that the ROS content in the TiO2 photocatalysis group was significantly higher than in the PBS and NaClO treatment groups (Fig 5A). Fluorescent enzyme labeler measurements also showed that the MFI in the TiO2 photocatalysis group was extremely higher, indicating increased ROS levels in the eggs compared to the PBS and NaClO groups (Fig 5B). These results suggest that TiO2 photocatalysis leads to the accumulation of ROS in the eggs. Mitochondria also produce ATP, which provides the energy required for cellular functions. To further examine the ATP content in eggs after photocatalysis, we used an ATP assay kit to measure ATP levels. The results showed that the Relative Light Unit (RLU) in the TiO2 photocatalysis group was significantly lower than in the PBS group, but remarkably higher than in the NaClO group (Fig 5C). These results indicate that TiO2 photocatalysis impairs mitochondrial function of eggs.
(A) Microscopic observation of the binding of DCFH-DA dye to the eggs (scale bars = 200 μm). (B) Fluorescent enzyme labeler detection of the Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of DCFH-DA positive eggs, and MFI represents ROS levels. (C) Fluorescent enzyme labeler detection of the RLU in the eggs, and RLU represents ATP levels. Data are presented as mean + SD in (B) and (C), n = 3 per group for (B) and (C), ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns: not statistically significant.
3.6. Significant decrease in infection rate of mice infected with TiO2-treated eggs
To further verify whether the eggs treated with TiO2 photocatalysis still have infectivity, we gavaged mice with TiO2-treated eggs. The results showed no statistically significant difference in body weight between the groups at the respective timepoints (Fig 6A). However, H. nana eggs were detected in the feces of mice from the H. nana and NaClO groups, with an infection rate of 100% (8/ 8). Notably, in the TiO2-treated group, only one mouse’s feces tested positive for H. nana eggs, with an infection rate of 12.5% (1/ 8) (Fig 6B). Compared with the H. nana group, the NaClO-treated group showed an increasing trend in the number of eggs and adults, but it was not statistically significant. Dramatically, the number of eggs, the number of adults dissected from the intestinal lumen of mouse, and the length of H. nana adults in the TiO2-treated group were significantly less than those in the H. nana and NaClO groups. (Fig 6C-6E). These results indicate a decrease in the infectivity of the H. nana eggs post TiO2 treatment.
(A) Body weight changes: the initial body weight was set as 100%. (B) The height of the orange bar indicates the number of infected mice and the height of the green bar indicates the number of non-infected mice. (C) Number of eggs detected in mouse feces. (D) Number of adults dissected into the intestinal lumen of each mouse. (E) Length of adults. Data are presented as mean + SD in (A, C-E), n = 8 per group for (A-D), n = 9, 16, and 31 per group for (E). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns: not statistically significant.
4. Discussion
H. nana infection is primarily transmitted through the fecal-oral route, eggs are commonly found in raw water, sewage, sludge, and wastewater, serving as the main source of infection for H. nana. TiO2 is a novel nanomaterial, owns a range of advantages such as being non-toxic, supreme chemical stable, and cost-affordable [33]. It is widely used in wastewater treatment, environmental decontamination, and other fields [34–36]. The photocatalytic activity of TiO2 is directly related to its exposed crystalline facets [37]. The (101) facet of anatase TiO2 is thermodynamically stable, but its energy density is only 0.44 J/m2, which is deficient in absorbing solar energy. The energy density of the TiO2 (001) facet is practically twice as high as that of the (101) facet (0.90 J/m2), and the catalytic properties and adsorption of TiO2 improve with the increase in the percentage of the area of the (001) facet [25]. Therefore, the catalytic properties and adsorption of TiO2 (001) we used will be better compared to that of TiO2 of anatase type (101). TiO2 has been found to be lethal to fungi, bacteria, viruses, and insects [16,20,38]. It is still unknown whether TiO2 is lethal to parasite eggs. In this study, it was found that TiO2 could inactivate H. nana eggs by destroying the structure and mitochondrial function of the eggs through photocatalytic activity. This study represented the first systematic evaluation of TiO2 photocatalytic activity against worm eggs. Furthermore, we transcended the limitations of survival rate assessment alone by visualizing ultrastructural damage via electron microscopy and quantitatively detecting key biochemical indicators (ROS and ATP) to validate mitochondrial dysfunction. Finally, we innovatively linked in vitro findings to a validated in vivo infection model, providing compelling evidence for the practical application potential of this method.
TiO2 photocatalytic inactivation of pathogens in water depends on factors such as light intensity and the type of pathogen [39]. In this study, we found that the inactivation effect of TiO2 on H. nana eggs is mainly affected by factors such as light exposure, solution pH, material concentration, and light intensity. TiO2 did not show any lethal effect on the eggs under dark condition, and the best inactivation effect was observed at a TiO2 concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. These results suggest that TiO2 inactivates parasitic eggs only under certain conditions, specifically requiring light exposure for the inactivation.
The hatching rate of H. nana eggs significantly decreased after TiO2 photocatalysis, with the hatching rate being much lower than that of NaClO after 2 h of treatment. SEM results showed that TiO2 photocatalysis caused morphological and structural damage to the eggs, such as shrinkage, deformation, and loss of spherical shape. The mitochondria and other organelles inside the eggs were swollen and dissolved, and the substance structure of the hexacanth embryos disappeared. These findings indicate that although the eggs treated with photocatalysis maintained some morphological features, they were essentially dead and lost their infectious characteristics. SEM results revealed TiO2 adsorption on the insect egg surface, while TEM observations showed that TiO2 itself does not penetrate the eggshell to directly disrupt its structure. Since the generated ROS and free radicals undergo redox reactions on the photocatalyst surface. We therefore hypothesize that the sustained ROS produced during photocatalysis damage cellular organelles such as mitochondria in the eggs, ultimately leading to the death of oocyte.
Mitochondria are the energy centers of cells, generating large amounts of ATP to provide energy to the cell, as well as being the primary sites for the production of ROS. Excessive and uncontrolled ROS production can harm the cell, causing mitochondrial and tissue damage, reducing ATP levels, and ultimately leading to cell death [40,41]. Studies have shown that TiO2 produces large amounts of ROS when excited by visible light, thus destroying bacteria [13]. After Foraminifera are exposed to TiO2 for 1 h, excessive ROS leads to mitochondrial membrane depolarization and genotoxicity [42]. Additionally, the ROS generated within parasites and changes in mitochondrial membrane potential are the primary causes of Leishmania parasite death [43]. TEM observations revealed that both NaClO and TiO2 treatments reduced the number of mitochondria in the eggs. This morphological disruption strongly correlated with functional testing outcomes: a significant increase in ROS levels and a sharp decline in ATP content. We hypothesized that ROS generated by TiO2 initially attacked and disrupted mitochondrial membrane structures, leading to reduced numbers and functional loss. As cellular powerhouses, the collapse of mitochondrial function directly disrupted ATP synthesis. This vicious cycle of morphological and functional deterioration ultimately resulted in egg inactivation. Although our study confirmed elevated ROS and reduced ATP levels, the specific mechanisms by which ROS damage mitochondria and egg structures remain unclear. Future work necessitates the use of chemical probes to precisely attribute the degradation of H. nana eggs to a particular active species. This will be accomplished by the free radical trapping experiment that introduces ammonium oxalate to quench holes (H+), tert-butanol to quench hydroxyl radicals (•OH), and p-benzoquinone to quench superoxide radicals (•O2-) [28].
Mouse infection experiments confirmed the biological significance of the aforementioned in vitro findings. Although TiO2 treatment did not achieve 100% absolute inactivation (one infection still occurred), it reduced the infection rate from 100% in the control group to 12.5%. In the sole infected mouse, the number and length of adult worms recovered from the intestine were also significantly reduced. This observation indicates that even if a few eggs survived, their ability to mature and reproduce was severely impaired. These results suggest that TiO2 -treated eggs have a reduced infectivity to the host. Current traditional disinfection methods have issues such as secondary pollution, toxicity, resistance, and irritant side effects [44], and NaClO used for treating parasitic eggs in water can lead to carcinogenic, teratogenic, and other side effects [12]. Additionally, sedimentation treatment and solar disinfection are not very effective in treating parasitic eggs in wastewater and fecal sludge [45]. Notably, although NaClO treatment also reduced egg hatching rates and caused structural damage, it showed no statistically significant difference from the control group in reducing mouse infection rates. This contrasts sharply with the results from the TiO2 treatment group. We postulated that this discrepancy stems from their differing mechanisms of action: NaClO as a potent oxidizing agent, likely primarily targets the outer shell of parasite eggs, whereas ROS generated by TiO2 photocatalysis could more effectively penetrate and disrupt key internal organelles within the eggs, such as mitochondria. Therefore, TiO2 photocatalysis technology holds promise as an alternative method to conventional disinfection treatments for parasitic eggs.
The experiment was conducted under idealized laboratory conditions. Whether organic matter, turbidity, and complex microbial communities present in real aquatic environments (such as wastewater) significantly interfere with the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 warrants further investigation. In subsequent studies, the inactivation efficiency of TiO2 should be tested in real wastewater, and methods to enhance its activity and stability in complex environments through optimization should be explored. Concurrently, research should be extended to other parasite eggs (such as Trichuris trichura eggs) to assess the universality of this technology. In summary, this study demonstrates that TiO2 can effectively inactivate H. nana eggs under ultraviolet light irradiation in water, with a superior effect compared to the conventional disinfectant NaClO. The inactivation is achieved by damaging the structural integrity of the eggs and impairing mitochondrial function within the eggs, thereby leading to their destruction.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we found that under optimal conditions (specifically at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL, light intensity of 0.50 mW/cm2, pH 6–8, and exposure to mercury lamp irradiation for 2 h), TiO2 photocatalysis effectively inactivated H. nana eggs. This treatment caused severe structural damage to insect eggs, including egg atrophy and a significant reduction in mitochondrial numbers. It also triggered a substantial increase in intracellular ROS levels and a sharp decline in ATP content. Concurrently, mouse infection experiments confirmed a significant reduction in infectivity. The infection rate in the control group reached 100%, whereas the TiO2-treated group showed only a 12.5% infection rate, accompanied by substantial decreases in parasite load and adult worm body length. Moreover, TiO2 demonstrated superior efficacy compared to the conventional disinfectant NaClO (0.6%), reducing egg hatching rates below 15%. These results quantitatively confirm that TiO2 photocatalysis possesses the ability to kill H. nana eggs. The findings provide fundamental data and insights for the application of TiO2 in combating parasitic eggs in water and offer valuable reference for the future practical use of TiO2, paving the way for photoenergy-mediated wastewater and drinkwater decontamination of TiO2 for public health benefit (Fig 7).
Tap water or wastewater from the inlet into the Sterilization pool 1, TiO2 in contact with eggs produces ROS when exposed to ultraviolet light, which kills eggs in the water by destroying their structure and the function of the mitochondria within them. The initial sterilization of the water will flow into the Sterilization pool 2, which is further disinfected through the TiO2, and at the same time through the activated carbon for filtration, and finally disinfected water discharged through the outlet.
Supporting information
S1 Text. Supplementary Materials and Methods.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013715.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Fig. Trypan blue staining for H. nana eggs.
Red arrowheads indicate viable eggs; black arrowheads indicate non-viable eggs; scale bars = 20 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013715.s002
(TIF)
S1 Table. Data used for graphing in manuscript.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013715.s003
(XLSX)
References
- 1. Tanabe MB, Caravedo MA, Morales ML, Lopez M, White AC, Baca-Turpo B, et al. A Comparison of the Risk for Chronic Fascioliasis between Children 3 to 5 Years and Children 6 to 12 Years of Age in the Cusco Region of Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;105(3):684–7. pmid:34280140
- 2. Kandi V, Koka SS, Bhoomigari MR. Hymenolepiasis in a Pregnant Woman: A Case Report of Hymenolepis nana Infection. Cureus. 2019.
- 3. Cheng T, Liu G-H, Song H-Q, Lin R-Q, Zhu X-Q. The complete mitochondrial genome of the dwarf tapeworm Hymenolepis nana--a neglected zoonotic helminth. Parasitol Res. 2016;115(3):1253–62. pmid:26666886
- 4. Sharma S, Lyngdoh D, Roy B, Tandon V. Differential diagnosis and molecular characterization of Hymenolepis nana and Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae) based on nuclear rDNA ITS2 gene marker. Parasitol Res. 2016;115(11):4293–8. pmid:27473838
- 5. Goudarzi F, Mohtasebi S, Teimouri A, Yimam Y, Heydarian P, Salehi Sangani G, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Hymenolepis nana in human and rodent hosts in Iran: A remaining public health concern. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;74:101580. pmid:33260017
- 6.
Akil A, Al-Daoody K, Younes R, Ali R, Hamad KM. Prevalence of Hymenolepis nana in Erbil City -North of Iraq. 2017.
- 7. Lucas SB, Hassounah O, Muller R, Doenhoff MJ. Abnormal development of Hymenolepis nana larvae in immunosuppressed mice. J Helminthol. 1980;54(2):75–82. pmid:7410809
- 8. Abdel Hamid MM, Eljack IA, Osman MKM, Elaagip AH, Muneer MS. The prevalence of Hymenolepis nana among preschool children of displacement communities in Khartoum state, Sudan: a cross-sectional study. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2015;13(2):172–7. pmid:25586647
- 9. Gizaw Z, Adane T, Azanaw J, Addisu A, Haile D. Childhood intestinal parasitic infection and sanitation predictors in rural Dembiya, northwest Ethiopia. Environ Health Prev Med. 2018;23(1):26. pmid:29933747
- 10. Bandala ER, González L, Sanchez-Salas JL, Castillo JH. Inactivation of Ascaris eggs in water using sequential solar driven photo-Fenton and free chlorine. J Water Health. 2012;10(1):20–30. pmid:22361699
- 11. Amoah ID, Adegoke AA, Stenström TA. Soil-transmitted helminth infections associated with wastewater and sludge reuse: a review of current evidence. Trop Med Int Health. 2018;23(7):692–703. pmid:29779225
- 12. Arnold Landry FK, Gideon Aghaindum A, Dennis AI, Thérèse Nadège OA, Pierre TN. Evaluation of the efficiency of some disinfectants on the viability of Hymenolepis nana eggs isolated from wastewater and faecal sludge in Yaounde (Cameroon): importance of some abiotic variables. Water Sci Technol. 2021;84(9):2499–518. pmid:34810327
- 13. Liao C, Li Y, Tjong SC. Visible-Light Active Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials with Bactericidal Properties. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10(1):124. pmid:31936581
- 14. Rostami M, Badiei A, Ganjali MR, Rahimi-Nasrabadi M, Naddafi M, Karimi-Maleh H. Nano-architectural design of TiO2 for high performance photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant: A review. Environ Res. 2022;212(Pt D):113347. pmid:35513059
- 15. Guo Q, Zhou C, Ma Z, Yang X. Fundamentals of TiO2 Photocatalysis: Concepts, Mechanisms, and Challenges. Adv Mater. 2019;31(50):e1901997. pmid:31423680
- 16. Wasa A, Land JG, Gorthy R, Krumdieck S, Bishop C, Godsoe W, et al. Antimicrobial and biofilm-disrupting nanostructured TiO2 coating demonstrating photoactivity and dark activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2021;368(7):fnab039. pmid:33864459
- 17. Yadav HM, Kolekar TV, Pawar SH, Kim J-S. Enhanced photocatalytic inactivation of bacteria on Fe-containing TiO2 nanoparticles under fluorescent light. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(3):57. pmid:26787489
- 18. Peiris M, Gunasekara T, Jayaweera PM, Fernando S. TiO₂ Nanoparticles from Baker’s Yeast: A Potent Antimicrobial. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;28(10):1664–70. pmid:30178650
- 19. Balkrishna A, Arya V, Rohela A, Kumar A, Verma R, Kumar D, et al. Nanotechnology Interventions in the Management of COVID-19: Prevention, Diagnosis and Virus-Like Particle Vaccines. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(10):1129. pmid:34696237
- 20. Liga MV, Maguire-Boyle SJ, Jafry HR, Barron AR, Li Q. Silica decorated TiO2 for virus inactivation in drinking water--simple synthesis method and mechanisms of enhanced inactivation kinetics. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(12):6463–70. pmid:23706000
- 21. Rajiv P, Mengelizadeh N, McKay G, Balarak D. Photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin with Fe2O3 nanoparticles loaded on graphitic carbon nitride: mineralisation, degradation mechanism and toxicity assessment. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2021;103(10):2193–207.
- 22. Al-Musawi TJ, Rajiv P, Mengelizadeh N, Sadat Arghavan F, Balarak D. Photocatalytic efficiency of CuNiFe2O4 nanoparticles loaded on multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a novel photocatalyst for ampicillin degradation. J Mol Liq. 2021;337:116470.
- 23. Al-Musawi TJ, Yilmaz M, Ramírez-Coronel AA, Al-Awsi GRL, Alwaily ER, Asghari A, et al. Degradation of amoxicillin under a UV or visible light photocatalytic treatment process using Fe2O3/bentonite/TiO2: Performance, kinetic, degradation pathway, energy consumption, and toxicology studies. Optik. 2023;272:170230.
- 24. Al-Musawi TJ, Mengelizadeh N, Alwared AI, Balarak D, Sabaghi R. Photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin by MMT/CuFe2O4 nanocomposite: characteristics, response surface methodology, and toxicity analyses. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(27):70076–93. pmid:37145364
- 25. Wang Y, Chen J, Yang X, Liu X, Que M, Ma Y, et al. 2D/2D g-C3N4/(001)-TiO2 Z-scheme heterojunction decorated with CQDs for enhanced Photocatalytic activity. Mater Today Commun. 2023;37:106969.
- 26. Liu X, Chen J, Yang L, Yun S, Que M, Zheng H, et al. 2D/2D g-C3N4/TiO2 with exposed (001) facets Z-Scheme composites accelerating separation of interfacial charge and visible photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B. J Phys Chem Solids. 2022;160:110339.
- 27. Yang L, Chen J, Liu X, Que M, Zhao Y, Zheng H, et al. 2D/2D BiOBr/(001)-TiO2 heterojunction toward enhanced photocatalytic degradation activity of Rhodamine B. J Alloys Compd. 2021;884:161064.
- 28. Yang L, Chen J, Que M, Liu X, Zheng H, Yang T, et al. Construction of 2D/2D/2D BiOBr/(001)-TiO2/Ti3C2T heterojunction for enhancing photocatalytic degradation of dye. J Alloys Compd. 2022;893:162289.
- 29. Mou R, Cui X-Y, Luo Y-S, Cheng Y, Luo Q-Y, Zhang Z-F, et al. Adult Hymenolepis nana and its excretory-secretory products elicit mouse immune responses via tuft/IL-13 and FOXM1 signaling pathways. Parasit Vectors. 2025;18(1):100. pmid:40069907
- 30. Cui X, Cheng Y, Wang H, Li X, Li J, Zhang K, et al. Hymenolepis nana antigens alleviate ulcerative colitis by promoting intestinal stem cell proliferation and differentiation via AhR/IL-22 signaling pathway. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024;18(12):e0012714. pmid:39666730
- 31. Mou R, Cui X, Wang H, Zhang Z, Cheng Y, Wu W, et al. Excretory/secretory products from Hymenolepis nana adult worms alleviate ulcerative colitis in mice via tuft/IL-13 signaling pathway. Parasit Vectors. 2025;18(1):230. pmid:40542404
- 32. Class CSC, Fialho PA, Alves LC, Silveira RL, Amendoeira MRR, Knackfuss FB, et al. Comparison of McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC techniques for the diagnosis of internal parasites in pigs. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2023;32(2):e013322. pmid:36995837
- 33. Yamakata AV, Junie Jhon M. Curious behaviors of photogenerated electrons and holes at the defects on anatase, rutile, and brookite TiO2 powders: A review. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev. 2019;40.
- 34. Hong F, Yu X, Wu N, Zhang Y-Q. Progress of in vivo studies on the systemic toxicities induced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2017;6(2):115–33. pmid:30090482
- 35. Ali SS, Al-Tohamy R, Koutra E, Moawad MS, Kornaros M, Mustafa AM, et al. Nanobiotechnological advancements in agriculture and food industry: Applications, nanotoxicity, and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ. 2021;792:148359. pmid:34147795
- 36. Nguyen NTT, Nguyen LM, Nguyen TTT, Liew RK, Nguyen DTC, Tran TV. Recent advances on botanical biosynthesis of nanoparticles for catalytic, water treatment and agricultural applications: A review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;827:154160. pmid:35231528
- 37. Gnanasekaran L, Pachaiappan R, Kumar PS, Hoang TKA, Rajendran S, Durgalakshmi D, et al. Visible light driven exotic p (CuO) - n (TiO2) heterojunction for the photodegradation of 4-chlorophenol and antibacterial activity. Environ Pollut. 2021;287:117304. pmid:34015669
- 38. Fatima M, Anjum T, Manzoor M, Aftab M, Aftab Z-E-H, Akram W, et al. Green synthesis and characterization of TiO2 nanoparticles from latex of Calatropis procera against dusky cotton bug. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):11102. pmid:40169618
- 39. Zhang C, Li Y, Shuai D, Shen Y, Wang D. Progress and challenges in photocatalytic disinfection of waterborne Viruses: A review to fill current knowledge gaps. Chem Eng J. 2019;355:399–415.
- 40. Ballard JWO, Towarnicki SG. Mitochondria, the gut microbiome and ROS. Cell Signal. 2020;75:109737. pmid:32810578
- 41. Andrieux P, Chevillard C, Cunha-Neto E, Nunes JPS. Mitochondria as a Cellular Hub in Infection and Inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11338. pmid:34768767
- 42. Ishitani Y, Ciacci C, Ujiié Y, Tame A, Tiboni M, Tanifuji G, et al. Fascinating strategies of marine benthic organisms to cope with emerging pollutant: Titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Environ Pollut. 2023;330:121538. pmid:37011780
- 43. Sasidharan S, Saudagar P. An anti-leishmanial compound 4’,7-dihydroxyflavone elicits ROS-mediated apoptosis-like death in Leishmania parasite. FEBS J. 2023;290(14):3646–63. pmid:36871140
- 44. Wang H-B, Wu Y-H, Luo L-W, Yu T, Xu A, Xue S, et al. Risks, characteristics, and control strategies of disinfection-residual-bacteria (DRB) from the perspective of microbial community structure. Water Res. 2021;204:117606. pmid:34500181
- 45. Keffala C, Harerimana C, Vasel JL. Helminth eggs in wastewater and sludge from treatment plants: sanitary stakes and importance of waste stabilization ponds. Environ Risq Santé. 2012;11(6):511–20.