Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Engaging communities in the control of arboviral diseases: insights from the African region

  • Anankpo Gildas Yahouédo ,

    yahouedoa@who.int

    Affiliation UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Corinne S. Merle,

    Affiliation UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Emmanuel Chanda,

    Affiliation Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Ingrid B. Rabe,

    Affiliation Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Florence Fouque,

    Affiliation UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Diana P. Rojas,

    Affiliation Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Abraham Aseffa,

    Affiliation UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Christine M. Halleux,

    Affiliation UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Raman Velayudhan

    Affiliation Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Introduction

Arboviral diseases, transmitted by vectors such as mosquitoes and ticks, continue to pose increasing public health threats in Africa [1] and all other continents. Factors contributing to increase include unplanned urbanization, population growth, malnutrition, poor waste management, inadequate water treatment, cross-border mobility, and social inequalities [2,3]. Controlling arboviral diseases is complex due to the intricate interactions among pathogens, vectors, hosts, and environmental factors, requiring integrated approaches [4]. Anticipated increases in temperature may increase water shortages, leading to water hoarding and creating more mosquito aquatic habitats [4]. Community engagement is a strategic approach in the pillars of the Global Arbovirus Initiative, and has been recognized as a key component in the successful implementation of arboviral disease control programmes [5]. Active engagement of communities requires a shift from traditional top-down interventions to approaches that incorporate local knowledge and perspectives [6]. Engaging communities in the prevention and control of arboviral diseases should cultivate a sense of ownership and responsibility for vector control efforts, thereby enhancing compliance with preventive measures and promoting sustained behavioral change. However, there are obstacles to effective engagement of communities in arboviral disease prevention and control efforts [7].

Based on responses to a region-wide survey, this viewpoint summarizes some of the barriers to community sensitization and engagement in activities related to the control of arboviral diseases across all 47 countries in the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region. Community sensitization educates and raises awareness, whereas engagement promotes collaboration by involving communities in decision-making, planning, implementation, and evaluation of interventions. The survey was initiated to guide countries as part of the preparedness and response efforts to the growing outbreaks/epidemics of arboviral diseases in the region [8]. Countries were assessed in 2021 through an online self-administered questionnaire, hosted on WHO’s platform, covering five capacity indicators and other barriers for community sensitization and engagement in the control of arboviral diseases. The capacity indicators included (i) existence of outreach programmes for conducting community sensitization and engagement activities, (ii) their effective functioning, (iii) regular training of outreach programme staff, (iv) optimal geographical coverage (across all districts), and (v) sufficient financial resources for the functioning of outreach programmes. All 47 countries (100%) submitted their responses. The respondents were national experts from ministries of health, national health departments, and research institutes. Since the barriers were reported using a self-administered questionnaire, there might be potential for bias, implying that they should be considered only indicative.

In order to provide a broader perspective than the data gathered in the survey alone, additional key barriers were explored in pertinent literature. Barriers reported in both the survey and the literature are discussed to propose a more cohesive way forward for enhancing community sensitization and engagement.

Barriers to effective community sensitization and engagement in the control of arboviral diseases in the African region

Barriers identified through a survey

The survey identified three critical barriers: (i) lack of financial resources to cover staff time and activities of outreach programmes (reported by 46/47 countries, 98%), (ii) lack of training of community healthcare workers, community leaders, and heads of community-based organizations responsible for community sensitization and mobilization (reported by 40/47 countries, 85%), and (iii) lack of adequate communication with communities on the risk of transmission of arboviral diseases and vector control activities (reported by 24/47 countries, 51%) (Fig 1). Despite the existence of outreach programmes in 85% of countries, they do not effectively achieve the objectives due to the identified barriers. Other challenges included: the lack of educational and sensitization materials for both community trainers and healthcare workers, message misinterpretation, insufficient community health workers, the absence of national guidelines for outreach programmes, and insecurity in remote areas [8].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Capacity indicators related to community sensitization and engagement for the prevention and control of arboviral diseases in the WHO African Region.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013300.g001

Barriers identified from the literature

To gain a comprehensive understanding of barriers, the literature was reviewed to identify additional key barriers not mentioned in the survey but pertinent to the African region. Indeed, community engagement lacks standardized methods across diverse cultural and socioeconomic contexts [9]. The variability of communities and arboviral diseases requires customized approaches, making universal strategies ineffective.

Community-based interventions struggle with long-term sustainability and scalability, especially in resource-limited settings. Despite small-scale studies showing effectiveness, maintaining impact over time and expanding to larger populations remains challenging due to competing health priorities and limited funding [10].

There is limited integration of community engagement approaches into existing national strategies for the prevention and control of arboviral diseases [10]. The siloed nature of many interventions can lead to duplication of efforts and inefficient use of resources.

Communicating complex medical and scientific information poses challenges in community engagement due to technical intricacies, evolving research, and expert disagreements [11]. Local communication difficulties often require escalation through social and political hierarchies [9]. Additional obstacles include a lack of transparency, limited multilingual materials, and unsustainable communication tools [9].

The use of digital tools and mobile technologies for community engagement in arboviral disease control is underexplored despite their potential in improving disease surveillance and health communication [12].

Way forward

Considering the barriers reported in both the survey and the literature, successful engagement of communities in the control of arboviral diseases in the African Region requires multisectoral collaboration and the identification and implementation of long-term solutions that prioritize the ideas of affected communities. Knowledge, attitude, and practices surveys are needed to identify these ideas but also opportunities to improve community sensitization and engagement. Implementation research, policy, and practice are needed to inform strategies for overcoming the barriers. Table 1 provides a summary of the barriers and suggested solutions, including: increased funding, community capacity building, tailored information, education and communication (IEC) materials, integration of volunteer community members into the primary healthcare system, trust-building and enhanced communication, sustained community engagement, use of digital tools by communities, and addressing insecurity and safety concerns impeding community involvement or identifying alternatives approaches when insecurity is a persistent challenge. Policymakers and national disease control programmes in the African Region are encouraged to consider implementing these solutions, which are also applicable to other diseases.

thumbnail
Table 1. Barriers and suggested solutions for disease control programmes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013300.t001

Conclusion

Community engagement is a key approach for controlling arboviral diseases in the African Region, but important barriers must be addressed through multisectoral collaboration ranging from policymakers to community members. Strategies for community engagement should be evidence-informed, culturally appropriate, and sustainable. Existing resources (guidelines, tools) can help African authorities and communities apply effective engagement approaches, potentially reducing arboviral disease threats when combined with existing and innovative vector control methods.

Acknowledgments

Disclaimer: Authors are current and former staff members of the World Health Organization (WHO); the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policies or views of WHO.

References

  1. 1. Tajudeen YA, Oladipo HJ, Oladunjoye IO, Yusuf RO, Sodiq H, Omotosho AO, et al. Emerging arboviruses of public health concern in Africa: priorities for future research and control strategies. Challenges. 2022;13(2):60.
  2. 2. Azevedo TS de, Piovezan R. Relationship between environmental factors and arboviruses in urban areas. Planetary health approaches to understand and control vector-borne diseases. Wageningen Academic. 2023. 92–117.
  3. 3. Weger-Lucarelli J, Auerswald H, Vignuzzi M, Dussart P, Karlsson EA. Taking a bite out of nutrition and arbovirus infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(3):e0006247. pmid:29596427
  4. 4. Alqassim AY. Social, behavioral and environmental determinants of vector-borne diseases: a narrative review of evidence and implications for integrated control approaches. J Vector Borne Dis. 2024;61(4):525–35.
  5. 5. Lin H, Liu T, Song T, Lin L, Xiao J, Lin J, et al. Community involvement in dengue outbreak control: an integrated rigorous intervention strategy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(8):e0004919. pmid:27548481
  6. 6. Rivera EP, Arrivillaga MR, Juárez JG, De Urioste-Stone SM, Berganza E, Pennington PM. Adoption of community-based strategies for sustainable vector control and prevention. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1834. pmid:37730592
  7. 7. Zerfu B, Kassa T, Mamo G, Legesse M. Knowledge, attitude, and practices of the community about Chikungunya in selected Districts of Afar Region, Northeast Ethiopia; its implications for controlling the disease: a community-based quantitative and qualitative cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):3441. pmid:39695519
  8. 8. World Health Organization, UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. Surveillance and control of arboviral diseases in the WHO African region: assessment of country capacities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/364827
  9. 9. World Health Organization. Report of the third meeting of the WHO Technical Advisory Group on Arboviruses (TAG-Arbovirus): hybrid meeting, Accra, Ghana, 20-22 June 2023. World Health Organization; 2024. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/379238
  10. 10. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Strengthening preparedness for arboviral diseases. National Academies Press (US); 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK609738/
  11. 11. Vanderslott S, Van Ryneveld M, Marchant M, Lees S, Nolna SK, Marsh V. How can community engagement in health research be strengthened for infectious disease outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa? A scoping review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):633. pmid:33794820
  12. 12. Mustafa U-K, Kreppel KS, Brinkel J, Sauli E. Digital technologies to enhance infectious disease surveillance in tanzania: a scoping review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(4):470. pmid:36833004
  13. 13. World Health Organization. Risk communication and community engagement readiness and initial response for novel coronaviruses (nCoV): interim guidance. 2020. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/332301
  14. 14. World Health Organization. Risk communication and community engagement readiness and response toolkit: yellow fever. 2024. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/376259
  15. 15. World Bank Group. A guide to community engagement for public-private partnerships. 2019. Available from: https://commdev.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/PPP-Community-Engagement-Guide_FIN-for-WEB-1.pdf