Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Epidemiological characteristics of human-to-human transmission of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China from 1996 to 2023

  • Li Yuan,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Tingting Tian,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis

    Affiliations National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Aqian Li,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliations National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Shanshan Du,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliations National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Shiwen Wang,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliations National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Dexin Li,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliation National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Xiaoxia Huang ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    huangxx@ivdc.chinacdc.cn (HXX), lijd@ivdc.chinacdc.cn (LJD)

    Affiliations National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Jiandong Li

    Roles Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    huangxx@ivdc.chinacdc.cn (HXX), lijd@ivdc.chinacdc.cn (LJD)

    Affiliations National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Abstract

Background

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging viral disease transmitted mainly through the bite of Haemaphysalis longicornis, and can cause clusters through contact transmission, and its incidence shows a rising and spreading trend in China. This study aimed to analyze the occurrence process of human-to-human transmission clusters and provide evidence for effective implementation of interventions.

Methods

Data about SFTS human-to-human transmission clusters were extracted from 42 published articles. R 4.4.1 and Microsoft Excel software were used to process and analyze the epidemiological and clinical data extracted.

Results

37 clusters occurring from 1996 to 2023 were retrieved, of which 2 (5.41%) involved third-generation transmission, 7 (18.92%) involved 16 asymptomatic infections, and 9 (24.32%) involved 17 medical personnel. There were 37 index cases with a case fatality rate of 97.30%, 135 secondary cases with a case fatality rate of 12.40%, and an overall of 31.33%. The first treatment of the index case was mainly in primary medical institutions (24, 64.86%) and the most common symptoms were fever, fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms. The index cases were distributed from March to October each year, the peak was from April to July, and the incubation period was 5–21 days, mostly in middle-aged and elderly farmers. Clusters were mainly distributed in Jiangsu Province (9 clusters), followed by Henan, Shandong and Zhejiang Provinces (6 clusters each). The clusters occurred mostly in the progress of care (72.97%), funeral (64.86%) and treatment of patients (24.32%), involving relatives (75.76%), medical workers (12.12%), villagers (9.85%) and morticians (2.27%). Almost all clusters were spread by contact with patients’ blood and bloody secretions (97.30%).

Conclusions

SFTS human-to-human transmission clusters sometimes occur in China, with a high case fatality rate. It is necessary to strengthen public health education, and improve the early diagnosis and treatment ability of medical workers, to avoid nosocomial infection or family (community) transmission.

Author summary

This study explored the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 37 SFTS human-to-human transmission clusters that occurred in China from 1996 to 2023. We found that the clusters occurred from March to November and were mainly concentrated in rural areas in central, eastern and northeastern China, and the affected population was mainly middle-aged and elderly farmers. The number of cases involved in a single cluster ranged from 2 to 13, with an average of 5 cases. Because the early symptoms were atypical, most of the index cases were diagnosed after multiple medical visits. The case fatality of the index cases (97.30%) was extremely high. Secondary cases were mostly infected by contact with the blood and bloody secretions of patients, and mostly occurred among family members, medical workers, villagers, and morticians who were involved in nursing care (72.97%), funeral and mortuary (64.86%), and medical treatment (24.32%). If early diagnosis, treatment and management can be achieved, while raising public awareness of SFTS and taking personal precautions when caring for cases and contacting the remains of SFTS cases, the occurrence of human-to-human transmission clusters can be avoided.

Introduction

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is a zoonotic disease caused by Dabie bandavirus (also known as SFTS virus) firstly identified in China with a high case fatality rate (30%) [1]. Clinical manifestation of SFTS is often complex and atypical, mainly characterized by fever, thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms [1]. SFTS virus belongs to genus Bandavirus of the family Phenuiviridae, mainly transmitted by Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks [2,3], and also can cause human-to-human transmission through contact with SFTS patient’s blood, bloody secretions, and so on [46]. Due to its high fatality and human-to-human transmission, SFTS has been considered as a challenge to public health.

In 2010, China issued guidelines for SFTS diagnosis and reporting across all region and SFTS case is required to be reported to Chinese Disease Prevention and Control Information System, which is an infectious disease surveillance network operating from the county to provincial levels in China [7]. From 2010 to 2021, a total of 18,973 SFTS cases have been reported in 27 provinces in China, about 99% distributed in Shandong, Anhui, Henan, Hubei, Liaoning, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu 7 provinces. These cases were predominantly middle-aged and elderly farmers [8,9]. SFTS has been expanding in the region and the number of cases is rapidly increasing in recent years. Besides China, autochthonous SFTS cases have been reported in several Asian countries, including Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Myanmar and Thailand [1014]. In Africa, antibodies to SFTS virus were detected in the general population of Kenya [15].

The number of SFTS cases in China is far more than that of Japan and South Korea [16]. In China, SFTS cases are mainly distributed in seven provinces mentioned above. It is highly sporadic and can occur throughout the year, but mainly from April to October, accounting for 97% of the total number of cases, peaked at May to July [8]. Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks, the primary vector of SFTS virus, have a broad host range including livestock such as cattle, sheep, and dogs, as well as various wild animals [17]. They are widely distributed across China, particularly in North China and Central China [18]. Studies [19,20] have shown that ticks usually prefer to inhabit in warm and humid environments with abundant vegetation and are mostly active in spring and autumn. People living, working, or traveling in areas such as hills, mountains, and forests have a higher exposure chance to ticks and are at a higher risk of SFTS virus infection.

Although SFTS is mainly sporadic, clusters caused by human-to-human transmission occurred occasionally in some regions in China, which aroused public health concerns. In order to further clarify the occurrence process and dynamic characteristics of SFTS human-to-human transmission clusters in China, formulate targeted preventive and control measures, and avoid the occurrence of such preventable public health events, this study systematically analyzed clusters of SFTS human-to-human transmission in China that were publicly published between January 2010 and September 2024.

Methods

Case definition

SFTS cases were classified as suspected cases and lab-confirmed cases in China, based on their epidemiological information, clinical manifestations and laboratory test results [7]. The case definitions of them have been detailed described in our previous studies [21]. In this study, “clusters of SFTS human-to-human transmission” is defined as a transmission occurred from an index SFTS case to at least one close contacts who was lab-confirmed SFTS cases, within 21 days.

Study objects

Information related to clusters of SFTS human-to-human transmission occurring in China from domestic and foreign published literature was obtained. The period of literature search was from January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2024, including both Chinese and English languages.

Search strategy

Literature about clusters of SFTS human-to-human transmission was searched in four databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, Web of Science and PubMed. Search terms “severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome & person-to-person transmission” and “severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome & human-to-human transmission” were used to search literature written both in English and Chinese. Furthermore, considering that human-to-human transmission is often directly translated into “cluster” used in Chinese articles, in order to avoid missing relevant articles search terms “severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome & family cluster” and “severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome & cluster epidemic” were also used in searching literature in Chinese. In addition, the references of the included literature were also retrospectively checked. Literature unrelated to clusters of SFTS human-to-human transmission, review literature, and literature with scarce information or incomplete data were excluded.

Data extraction

According to the above search strategy, targeted literature was searched and screened. Firstly, duplications were removed. Secondly, literature unrelated to SFTS human-to-human transmission and review literature were excluded by reading the title and abstract. Thirdly, literature without relevant detailed information was excluded by reading the full text. After that, the remaining literature was included in this study. The data including authors, publication time, study region, basic information of SFTS cases, consultation information, clinical manifestations, epidemiological history, and information about secondary cases were extracted for the following descriptions and statistical analysis. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening and data extraction. For controversial literature or data, the decision of inclusion was made through internal discussion or consultation with experts.

Data analysis

Data was analyzed using R 4.4.1 and Microsoft Excel software. Descriptive epidemiological methods were used to analyze the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of clusters. Qualitative data was expressed by frequency and quantitative data was described by mean±standard deviation. To determine the difference between the index and secondary cases, Pearson χ2 test, Independent Sample T test and Wilcoxon W test were used to compare qualitative variables, normal and abnormal distribution continuous variables, respectively. In statistics, P < 0.05 indicates a significant difference.

Results

Inclusion of literature

Database searches yielded 820 potentially relevant articles. After removing duplications, 417 articles were included in the following screening. Of that, 328 were excluded after reading the title and abstract because of their apparent irrelevance. After reading the full text, 42 articles were finally included for further data extraction and analysis (Fig 1). The included articles were published from 2011 to 2024, 25 in Chinese and 17 in English.

Overview of human-to-human transmission clusters

37 human-to-human transmission clusters were retrieved, which involved 172 cases, including 37 index cases and 135 secondary cases. The earliest cluster occurred in 1996 and the latest in 2023. Of 37 clusters, two clusters reported third-generation secondary cases, seven clusters involved 16 secondary asymptomatic infections (positive for nucleic acid and/or IgM antibodies to SFTS virus), and nine involved 17 healthcare workers. Of these, 35 clusters reported health outcomes of all involved cases, with an average case fatality rate of 31.33% (52/166). The number of cases involved in a single cluster ranged from 2 to 13, with an average of 5 cases.

Regional distribution

The geographical distribution of 37 clusters showed regional clustering, mainly concentrated in rural areas in central, eastern and northeastern parts of China, involving 7 provinces. Of that, Jiangsu (9 clusters) accounting for the most clusters, accounted for 24.32%, followed by Henan, Shandong, and Zhejiang (6 clusters each), Anhui (5 clusters), Hubei (3 clusters), and Liaoning (2 clusters). In 2014, Zhejiang reported a cluster involving 13 cases and involved two provinces, Anhui and Zhejiang. In this cluster, two secondary cases in Anhui were diagnosed as confirmed SFTS cases after returning from a funeral for the index case in Zhejiang, and the source of the infection was suspected to be contact with the blood and secretions of the index case.

Population distribution

Among the 172 cases involved in 37 clusters the youngest was 20 years old, the oldest was 86 years old, and the average was 56.85 years old. Among them, the age range of index cases was from 35 to 82 years old, with an average of 65.86 years old. Twenty cases were males and seventeen were females. The occupation was mainly farmers, accounting for 83.78% (31/37). The age of secondary cases ranged from 20 to 86 years old, with an average age of 53.45 years old. There were 82 males, 33 females, and 20 cases lacked gender information. The average age of index cases was older than that of secondary cases, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 4.992, P < 0.05) (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Comparison of basic information, disease course and death between the index and secondary cases of 37 clusters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013283.t001

Temporal distribution

Based on the onset time of the index cases, 37 clusters occurred from March to October, with 3, 4, 10, 4, 5, 4, 2, and 5 clusters reported successively. Among them, the number of occurrences from May to July accounted for 51.35% (19/37). In terms of year of occurrence, the highest number of clusters were reported in 2022 (6 clusters), followed by 2016 (4 clusters) (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Temporal distribution of the index cases of the 37 clusters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013283.g002

Analysis of the onset and medical consultation of the index cases

The hospitals first consulted by the index cases were mainly primary medical institutions, of which 45.95% (17/37) were village-level clinics or health centers, 18.92% (7/37) were county-level hospitals, and 5.41% (2/37) were municipal-level hospitals. Multiple referrals to hospitals were common, with 78.38% (29/37) of cases having visiting frequency (or number of hospitals) ≥2 times, 79.31% (23/29) ≥3 times, and 13.04% (3/23) having 5 times. Of 37, 12 cases (32.43%) had a definite history of tick bites. Thirty-six of the thirty-seven index cases had symptoms recorded, which were mostly atypical, with fever (94.59%, 35/37), fatigue (51.35%, 19/37), and gastrointestinal symptoms (72.97%, 27/37) (Table 2), the latter being prevalent in diarrhea (8 cases), nausea (8 cases), and vomiting (8 cases). Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were present in 100% (35/35) and 100% (33/33) of cases, with results of multiple tests in some cases suggesting the presence of progressive decrease with a minimum of 1.03109/ml in leukocytes and 6109/ml in platelets. 91.89% (34/37) mentioned bleeding manifestations. 81.48% (22/27) of cases were critically ill and died after giving up treatment and discharging from the hospital. 14.81% (4/27) of cases were discharged from the hospital after death. 3.70% (1/27) of cases were discharged from the hospital after recovery. 36 index cases died, except for 1 case that recovered, with a case fatality rate of 97.30%. The disease course of the 36 dead patients ranged from 4 to 15 days, with an average of 8 days.

thumbnail
Table 2. Basic information and clinical manifestations of index cases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013283.t002

Analysis of the secondary cases

The secondary cases in each cluster ranged from 1 to 12 cases, with an average of 4 cases. A total of 135 secondary cases were reported in 37 clusters, of which 35 clusters referred to the health outcome of the secondary cases, involving 129 cases, including 16 deaths, with an average case fatality rate of 12.40% (16/129). Most of the clusters occurred in the process of caring (72.97%, 27/37), mortuary (64.86%, 24/37), and rescuing patients (24.32%, 9/37), and the people involved could be relatives (75.76%, 100/132), medical workers (12.12%, 16/132), villagers (9.85%, 13/132) and morticians (2.27%, 3/132). Thirty-six clusters (97.30%, 36/37) were considered to be transmitted through contact with SFTS patient’s blood and bloody secretions, and one was presumed to be caused by contact with patient’s sweat, and three other clusters mentioned that some individual secondary cases had no direct contact with patient’s blood, and it was presumed that there might be the possibility of aerosol transmission. 12 out of the 37 clusters had deaths in secondary cases, of that, 10 clusters reported one death in each cluster, one cluster reported two deaths, and another had four deaths (Henan, 2022, 5 secondary cases). The case fatality rate of a single cluster ranged from 8.33% to 80%. One cluster in Jiangsu in 1996 and one in Shandong in 2014 reported third-generation human-to-human transmission. The shortest incubation period of the secondary cases was 5 days and the longest was 21 days, mostly within 2 weeks. The time between the onset of the last case and the onset of the index case in human-to-human transmission clusters ranged from 8 to 44 days, with an average of 18 days.

Discussions

To better understand the occurrence process, epidemiological characteristics and clinical manifestations of SFTS human-to-human transmission clusters, this study systematically summarized and analyzed 37 clusters occurred in China which were publicly published between 2010 and 2023. Research findings showed that SFTS human-to-human transmission clusters have basically occurred in China every year since 2010, and the earliest one can be traced back to 1996, which suggests that SFTS virus infection has existed in the population for a long time. Most clusters involved second generation and very few involved third generation (2 clusters). Seven clusters reported 16 asymptomatic infections, among which all the third-generation infections in one cluster were asymptomatic.

In this study, we found that clusters were mainly distributed in Jiangsu, Henan, Shandong, Zhejiang, Anhui, Hubei, and Liaoning provinces, and the above 7 provinces are also the main endemic areas of SFTS in China, where about 99% of the cases occurred [8]. It should be noted that, in addition to the above high prevalence areas, other provinces or regions with relatively low numbers of reported cases have also reported family clusters of SFTS [61]. Although it is not clear whether the disease is caused by co-exposure or human-to-human transmission, it is necessary to pay more attention to the possible human-to-human transmission. Among 37 clusters, the index cases were mostly infected in rural areas, and most of them were farmers (83.78%). In mountainous areas, hilly regions and other areas with abundant vegetation, the density of ticks is high. Farmers often have to work and go in and out of these areas, so they are at a higher risk of exposure compared to other groups More than half of human-to-human transmission clusters in this study occurred from May to July. At this time, the temperature rises, and the activity of ticks enters a peak period. The opportunities for people to come into contact with ticks increase, and the risk of infection rises significantly [62,63]. In this study, the earliest index case occurred in March and the latest in October, and the cluster caused by the latter occurred in November, suggesting that close attention still needs to be paid to the occurrence of human-to-human transmission clusters during the non-major endemic seasons of SFTS.

It was found that the incubation period of the secondary cases of clusters ranged from 5 to 21 days, mostly within 2 weeks, which was basically consistent with the incubation period of infections transmitted by tick bite (generally 1–2 weeks, with an average of 9 days) [64]. Early symptoms of the index cases are mainly fever, fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms, which were easy to be regarded as common diseases such as cold or diarrhea, and then take medication by themselves or go to primary medical institutions such as village health clinics and private clinics for medical treatment. Due to the atypical early symptoms and the limitations of primary medical institutions in identifying this disease, there are cases of misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis [65]. The study found that most patients seek medical treatment in many places as their conditions don’t improve or even worsen. More than 79% of the cases had visited hospitals three times or more, which increased the risk of human-to-human transmission due to the delay in case diagnosis. This finding was similar to that in South Korea [66]. Some index cases were identified as SFTS cases only when the disease occurred among the contacts [6,2229]. Early identification by primary healthcare institutions is of great significance for the prevention and control of SFTS. It is recommended that primary medical institutions, especially those in key epidemic areas, should give health tips and carry out routine blood tests for the disease when suspected fever cases appear in daily consultations, so as to achieve early diagnosis, treatment and management, reduce the case fatality rate, and avoid clusters.

Among 37 index cases, except for one case of recovery, 36 died of SFTS, with an extremely high case fatality rate (97.30%). In addition, the case fatality rate monitored in secondary cases (12.40%) was also much higher than the average case fatality rate reported nationally (5%) [67]. The high case fatality rates of clusters, especially the index cases, are considered to be related to the old age of the cases, the lack of timely diagnosis and treatment, and the high viral load [68], which is also one of the main factors contributing to human-to-human transmission. In this study, almost all of the index cases had different degrees of hemorrhage, and the secondary cases mostly occurred among relatives, medical workers, villagers and morticians who were involved in nursing care (72.97%), funeral and mortuary (64.86%), and medical treatment (24.32%). Infections were mainly caused by contact with SFTS patient’s blood and bloody secretions (97.30%), while a few of the secondary cases claimed that they had not contacted the patient’s blood and bloody secretion, suggesting the possibility of aerosol transmission in confined spaces [38]. A cluster of SFTS human-to-human transmission that occurred in South Korea also confirmed this possibility [69]. The findings suggest that is necessary to further strengthen health promotion and education, raise public awareness of SFTS, improve personal protection awareness when caring for SFTS patients, reduce funeral procedures and advocate safe funerals. Nine clusters involved secondary infections among medical workers, which implies that it is necessary to further enhance diagnostic awareness and capacity, strengthen personal protection training for medical workers and avoid nosocomial infections [70].

There are some limitations in this paper. Firstly, during the process of literature screening, literature that lacked details and that could not yet be distinguished whether the cluster was caused through human-to-human transmission [71,72] were excluded. For example, in one cluster there were two patients who were couple lived together in rural areas and had developed SFTS successively. Epidemiological investigations had shown that there was a high possibility that they both was transmitted through tick bites, but it could not be ruled out whether it was transmitted through close contact because they had close contact during the onset of disease [72]. Secondly, the data in this study were taken from published literature, and unpublished clusters of human-to-human transmission, such as the cluster in Anhui that involved 18 cases [73] and the cluster that occurred in Hunan and other places were not included, which to some extent underestimated the actual level of SFTS human-to-human transmission.

In summary, this study extracted data on SFTS human-to-human transmission by screening publications and analyzed the epidemiological characteristics, occurrence process and risk of transmission, in order to provide a basic knowledge for the scientific prevention and control of SFTS human-to-human transmission.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the scholars in this field for providing basic information support for this study.

References

  1. 1. Yu X-J, Liang M-F, Zhang S-Y, Liu Y, Li J-D, Sun Y-L, et al. Fever with thrombocytopenia associated with a novel bunyavirus in China. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(16):1523–32. pmid:21410387
  2. 2. Luo L-M, Zhao L, Wen H-L, Zhang Z-T, Liu J-W, Fang L-Z, et al. Haemaphysalis longicornis Ticks as Reservoir and Vector of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus in China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(10):1770–6. pmid:26402039
  3. 3. Hu Y-Y, Zhuang L, Liu K, Sun Y, Dai K, Zhang X-A, et al. Role of three tick species in the maintenance and transmission of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(6):e0008368. pmid:32520966
  4. 4. Huang D, Jiang Y, Liu X, Wang B, Shi J, Su Z, et al. A Cluster of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Infections of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Caused by Person-to-Person Transmission. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(2):396–402. pmid:28722592
  5. 5. Mao L, Deng B, Liang Y, Liu Y, Wang Z, Zhang J, et al. Epidemiological and genetic investigation of a cluster of cases of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome bunyavirus. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):346. pmid:32410583
  6. 6. Liu Y, Li Q, Hu W, Wu J, Wang Y, Mei L, et al. Person-to-person transmission of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12(2):156–60. pmid:21955213
  7. 7. Chinese Ministry of Health. Guidelines for the prevention and control of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2011;04(4):193–4.
  8. 8. Chen QL, Zhu MT, Chen N, Yang D, Yin WW, Mu D, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of severe fever with thtrombocytopenia syndrome in China, 2011-2021. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022;43(6):852–9. pmid:35725341
  9. 9. Huang X, Li J, Li A, Wang S, Li D. Epidemiological Characteristics of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome from 2010 to 2019 in Mainland China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):3092. pmid:33802869
  10. 10. Etheart MD, Kligerman M, Augustin PD, Blanton JD, Monroe B, Fleurinord L, et al. Effect of counselling on health-care-seeking behaviours and rabies vaccination adherence after dog bites in Haiti, 2014-15: a retrospective follow-up survey. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(10):e1017–25. pmid:28911750
  11. 11. Takahashi T, Maeda K, Suzuki T, Ishido A, Shigeoka T, Tominaga T, et al. The first identification and retrospective study of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome in Japan. J Infect Dis. 2014;209(6):816–27. pmid:24231186
  12. 12. Win AM, Nguyen YTH, Kim Y, Ha N-Y, Kang J-G, Kim H, et al. Genotypic Heterogeneity of Orientia tsutsugamushi in Scrub Typhus Patients and Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Co-infection, Myanmar. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(8):1878–81. pmid:32687023
  13. 13. Kallampallil J, Wood SJ, O’Dempsey T, Craigie RJ. Nematode infection mimicking paratesticular malignancy. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2013200775. pmid:24326431
  14. 14. Chang MS, Woo JH. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: tick-mediated viral disease. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(6):795–6. pmid:23772137
  15. 15. Zohaib A, Zhang J, Agwanda B, Chen J, Luo Y, Hu B, et al. Serologic evidence of human exposure to the severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus and associated viruses in Kenya. Infect Dis (Lond). 2024;56(9):776–82. pmid:38913503
  16. 16. Yang T, Huang H, Jiang L, Li J. Overview of the immunological mechanism underlying severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2022;50(3):118. pmid:35856413
  17. 17. Deng GF. Economic insect fauna of China: fascicle 39, acari: ixodidae. Journal of Insect Knowledge. 1992;:52.
  18. 18. Zhao GP. Spatial distribution of ticks and their hazard prediction in China. Academy of Military Sciences. 2018.
  19. 19. Zhao Q, Gao LJ, Tang ZQ, Zhang YQ, Guo XS, Liu JQ. Investigation of species, temporal and spatial distribution of ticks in Henan province, China. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control. 2015;26(1):75–7.
  20. 20. Li CH, Yang YM, Miao XJ, Sun J, Zhang Y, Liu CJ, et al. Seasonal variation of ticks in Yantai, Shandong Province, China: A study based on the circular distribution method. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control. 2024;35(6):709–13.
  21. 21. Huang X, Wang S, Wang X, Lyu Y, Jiang M, Chen D, et al. Estimation of the incidence of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in high endemic areas in China: an inpatient-based retrospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):66. pmid:29402229
  22. 22. Hu J, Shi C, Li Z, Guo X, Qian Y, Tan W, et al. A cluster of cases of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome bunyavirus infection in China, 1996: A retrospective serological study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(6):e0006603. pmid:29940000
  23. 23. Bao C, Guo X, Qi X, Hu J, Zhou M, Varma JK, et al. A family cluster of infections by a newly recognized bunyavirus in eastern China, 2007: further evidence of person-to-person transmission. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(12):1208–14. pmid:22028437
  24. 24. Tang X, Wu W, Wang H, Du Y, Liu L, Kang K, et al. Human-to-human transmission of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome bunyavirus through contact with infectious blood. J Infect Dis. 2013;207(5):736–9. pmid:23225899
  25. 25. Tang X-Y, Cui N, Kang K, Wang H-F, You A-G, Zhao G-H, et al. Analysis on the diagnosis and treatment of a cluster of cases infected by new bunyavirus. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012;46(2):110–3. pmid:22490190
  26. 26. Gai Z, Liang M, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Jin C, Wang S-W, et al. Person-to-person transmission of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome bunyavirus through blood contact. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(2):249–52. pmid:22095565
  27. 27. Ma T, Xu Q, Li C, Zhang Z, Feng LJ, Li W, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Nanjing, China from 2010 to 2016. Modern Preventive Medicine. 2017;44(16):2890–4.
  28. 28. Lin GR, Yang X, Yu M. A cluster of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome was reported in 4 cases. Seek Medical and Ask the Medicine. 2012;10(7):741.
  29. 29. Qu RB, Guo ZK, Qin XY. Epidemiological investigation on cluster outbreak of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Rongcheng City. Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2013;13(10):1289–91.
  30. 30. Teng HF, Li AJ, Xu L, Liu AL. Novel bunyavirus infection in a family: report of four cases. Chinese Ceneral Pracrice. 2012;15(13):1529–30.
  31. 31. Qiu AP, Qu RB, Sun L. Investigation of family clusters of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Preventive Medicine Tribune. 2014;20(02):134–5.
  32. 32. Chen H, Hu K, Zou J, Xiao J. A cluster of cases of human-to-human transmission caused by severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome bunyavirus. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17(3):e206-8. pmid:23218674
  33. 33. Wang Y, Deng B, Zhang J, Cui W, Yao W, Liu P. Person-to-person asymptomatic infection of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus through blood contact. Intern Med. 2014;53(8):903–6. pmid:24739616
  34. 34. Huang W, Yu X, Wu H, Zhang L, Liao ZP, Lu HK. Investigation of an outbreak of a contact-transmitted febrile with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control. 2015;(2):172–5.
  35. 35. Jiang XL, Zhang S, Jiang M, Bi ZQ, Liang MF, Ding SJ, et al. A cluster of person-to-person transmission cases caused by SFTS virus in Penglai, China. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(3):274–9. pmid:25687766
  36. 36. Lu Y, Wu J, Xu P, Xie SY, Li KC, Hu JY, et al. Investigation of human-to-human transmission of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in western Anhui. Chinese Journal of Public Health. 2014;30(9):1129–32.
  37. 37. Gu S, Wu X, Zhou B, Ling F, Zhang H, Huang Y, et al. Epidemiological investigation on an outbreak of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in northwest Zhejiang province. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2015;36(4):364–7. pmid:25975551
  38. 38. Gong Z, Gu S, Zhang Y, Sun J, Wu X, Ling F, et al. Probable aerosol transmission of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in southeastern China. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(12):1115–20. pmid:26255811
  39. 39. Mao LL, Liu Y, Liang Y, Wang ZJ, Zhang J, Sun YW, et al. Molecular epidemiological investigation on cluster outbreak of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Liaoning province. In: Proceedings of the 8th Forum on Research and Application of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Technology, 2017. 426–31.
  40. 40. Liang YH, Qi S, Wu W, Zhou L. Investigation and analysis of the first cluster fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in a city. Chinese Primary Health Care. 2015;29(3):58–9.
  41. 41. Wang YM, Qu XB. Investigation on a family clustering occurrence of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. International Journal of Epidemiology and Infectious Disease. 2016;43(1):62–4.
  42. 42. Hu J, Li Z, Cai J, Liu D, Zhang X, Jiang R, et al. A Cluster of Bunyavirus-Associated Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Cases in a Coastal Plain Area in China, 2015: Identification of a Previously Unidentified Endemic Region for Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Bunyavirus. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(6):ofz209. pmid:31211156
  43. 43. Zhu Y, Wu H, Gao J, Zhou X, Zhu R, Zhang C, et al. Two confirmed cases of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome with pneumonia: implication for a family cluster in East China. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):537. pmid:28774267
  44. 44. He YX, Huang Y, He SS, Qi B, Zhao W, Wu FQ. Epidemiological investigation and study of a cluster epidemic of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Tongling City. China Preventive Medicine. 2018;19(7):553–6.
  45. 45. Chen Y, Jia B, Huang R, Yan X, Xiong Y, Yong L, et al. Occupational Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Following Needle-Stick Injury. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38(6):760–2. pmid:28397631
  46. 46. Chen JX. An epidemiological investigation report on a cluster of cases of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Henan J Prev Med. 2020;31(9):724–6.
  47. 47. Tao M, Liu Y, Ling F, Zhang R, Shi X, Ren J, et al. Characteristics of Three Person-to-Person Transmission Clusters of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome in Southeastern China. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;105(3):794–800. pmid:34252051
  48. 48. Shi XG, Sun JM, Liu Y, Zhang R, Ren JP, Guo S, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Zhejiang, 2015-2019. Disease Surveillance. 2021;36(5):431–5.
  49. 49. Lu J, Bian G. Epidemiological characteristics and cluster epidemic analysis of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Haizhou District, Lianyungang City from 2017 to 2022. Jiangsu Health Care. 2024;26(1):20-1,6.
  50. 50. Hu L, Li J, Zhang H, Bian T, Pan J, Li J, et al. Predisposing factors for person-to-person transmission of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome bunyavirus. J Hosp Infect. 2022;123:174–8. pmid:34767872
  51. 51. He M, Dong XQ, Shi LM, Wang YQ, Zhang SG. Phylogenetic analyses of the S gene of SFTSV in a cluster of cases of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses. 2022;38(6):502–6.
  52. 52. Li HW. Investigation of a cluster outbreak of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Zhaoyuan City. China Health Care & Nutrition. 2021;31(34):219.
  53. 53. Liu T, Zhang N, Li H, Hou S, Liu X. Analysis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome cluster in east China. Virol J. 2023;20(1):199. pmid:37658435
  54. 54. Li Y, Wang XY, Li YF, Li DX, Hu X, Zhu L, et al. The epidemiology and pathogeny investigation of two clusters of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome disease outbreaking in Henan Province, 2022. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023;57(10):1719–24. pmid:37859394
  55. 55. You AG, Li Y, Wang XY, Huang HQ, Zheng L, Yu P, et al. Epidemiological investigation and pathogenic characteristics of a cluster outbreak of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Henan. Modern Disease Control and Prevention. 2023;34(10):740–5.
  56. 56. Zhang L, Hu Y, Zhang J, Huang HQ, Chen JD. Clustered incidence investigation and emergency response of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in a place in Henan province. Modern Disease Control and Prevention. 2023;34(6):471-3,7.
  57. 57. Yang X, Wu Y-X, Leng Y, Li J-C, Wang C-J, Yuan Y-M, et al. Epidemiololgical and etiological analysis of two clusters of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Yi Chuan. 2023;45(11):1062–73. pmid:38764271
  58. 58. Lei W, Zhao X, Liu J, Zhang H, Da Q, Zhu WX, et al. An investigation of a cluster epidemic of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in a county in western Hubei province, China. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control. 2024;35(1):100–3.
  59. 59. Wen Y, Fang Y, Cao F, Zhang G, Cheng S, Yu Y, et al. A person-to-person transmission cluster of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome characterized by mixed viral infections with familial and nosocomial clustering. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24502. pmid:38298613
  60. 60. Luo YB, Liu L, Huang XS, Xu J, Liu M, Li FF, et al. Epidemiological Investigation of an epidemic of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Hubei, 2023. Disease Surveillance. 2024;39(8):1085–9.
  61. 61. Ye L, Ren Y, Mao B, Liu RD. A family cluster of cases of neobunyavirus infection has been reported. Disease Surveillance. 2012;27(12):987–9.
  62. 62. Estrada-Peña A. Ticks as vectors: taxonomy, biology and ecology. Rev Sci Tech. 2015;34(1):53–65. pmid:26470449
  63. 63. Gao QF, Tang XL, Lu SD, Zhang TY, Ma ZF. The relationship between the seasonal peak of haemaphysalis longicornis and the incidence of mycoplasma ovis disease and babesiosis in sheep, and the experiment on repelling and killing haemaphysalis longicornis. Modern Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine. 2016;(3):43–8.
  64. 64. Xu M, Lu Y. Research progress on fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Henan Medical Research. 2017;26(11):1971–3.
  65. 65. Wang Y, Qu X. Investigation and analysis of an outbreak of a family cluster fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. International Journal of Epidemiology and Infectious Disease. 2016;43(1):62–4.
  66. 66. Kim K-H, Yi J, Kim G, Choi SJ, Jun KI, Kim N-H, et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, South Korea, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(11):1892–4. pmid:24206586
  67. 67. Zhan J, Wang Q, Cheng J, Hu B, Li J, Zhan F, et al. Current status of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China. Virol Sin. 2017;32(1):51–62. pmid:28251515
  68. 68. Li H, Lu Q-B, Xing B, Zhang S-F, Liu K, Du J, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of laboratory-diagnosed severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China, 2011-17: a prospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(10):1127–37. pmid:30054190
  69. 69. Moon J, Lee H, Jeon JH, Kwon Y, Kim H, Wang EB, et al. Aerosol transmission of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus during resuscitation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;19:1–4.
  70. 70. Chinese Center Disease Control and Prevention. Technical guidelines for the prevention and control of fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. 2024.
  71. 71. Wang J, Cai L, Yang H, He FL, Hu XP, Hu SX, et al. Epidemiological investigation and etiological analysis on a cluster of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in a family. Disease Surveillance. 2021;36(7):729–33.
  72. 72. Wang H, Zhao LF, Sun G, Cao G, Hu FF, Chu HL, et al. Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics and clustering epidemics of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Changzhou City from 2012 to 2021. Acta Parasitologica et Medica Entomoiogica Sinica. 2023;30(1):1–5.
  73. 73. China Information System For Disease Control And Prevention. China information system for disease control and prevention. https://10.249.6.18:8881/cdc/login. 2023 October 1.