Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Smelly communication between haemaphysalis longicornis and infected hosts with indolic odorants: A case from severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus

  • Zhitong Liu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China, Inspection and Testing Department of Jinhua center for disease prevention and Control, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China

  • Hao Feng,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Xiaohe Liu,

    Roles Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Bin Wu,

    Roles Software

    Affiliation Inspection and Testing Department of Jinhua center for disease prevention and Control, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China

  • Hong Zhang,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Military Hospital of 95948 Troops of PLA, Jiuquan, Gansu, China

  • Yi Sun ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    378176938@qq.com (YS); jiahongw@gmc.edu.cn (JW)

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Jiahong Wu ,

    Roles Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    378176938@qq.com (YS); jiahongw@gmc.edu.cn (JW)

    Affiliation Basic medical School, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China

  • Chunxiao Li,

    Roles Methodology, Supervision, Validation

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Jiafu Jiang

    Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

Abstract

Objects

Vector ticks’ perception of characteristic odors emitted by infected hosts is key to understand tick’s foraging behavior for infected host and design odor-based control strategies for tick-borne diseases.

Methods

Laboratory mice knocked out for type I interferon (IFN) receptors (Ifnar-/-) were used to develop a simulated host by intraperitoneal infection with Bandavirus dabieense (SFTSV). Urine and fecal samples were collected 4 days post-infection and analyzed to detect differential volatile metabolites (DVMs) during infection. Next, the two salient odor cues among the SFTSV-induced host DVMs, indole and 3-methylindole, were used to test the olfactory response of Haemaphysalis. longicornis by electroantennographic detection (EAD) and Y-tube olfactometry, respectively. To gain insight into the potential olfactory mechanism, two olfactory-associated proteins, Niemann-Pick type C2 (NPC2) and Odor Binding Protein-like (OBPL) proteins were annotated from the transcriptomic data derived from H. longicornis forelegs. Online tools were used to predict the ligand binding properties of the two proteins to the two indole candidates. Simultaneously, quantitative RT-PCR using β-actin as an internal reference gene was used to monitor the relative transcript levels of NPC2 and OBPL proteins under the stimulation of two indole candidates. The significantly regulated proteins were cloned and expressed with the vector plasmid pET-28b in vitro. The purified proteins were tested for the binding properties to the two indole candidates.

Results

SFTSV-infected Ifnar-/- mice upregulated 11 DVMs in fecal samples, mostly indoles and phenols, along with indole biosynthesis and related metabolic processes. In the urine samples, 29 DVMs were downregulated in the infected host, with eucalyptol and phenylalanine acid being the most altered. We test the olfactory responses of H. longicornis to indole and 3-methylindole, which influence tick foraging behavior. The olfactometers showed that the tick preferred both indole and 3-methylindole. EAD tests showed that stimulation of the olfactory receptor neuron in Haller’s organ produced significant active potential in response to indoles. Two olfactory proteins, NPC2 and OBPL, were successfully annotated from H. longicornis foreleg transcriptomic data. NPC2 has a β-barrel structure that binds signal chemicals, while OBPL is a classical OBP with a hydrophobic binding cavity. When monitoring the transcript levels of NPC2 and OBPL in the tick forelegs, the increased transcript level (1.2-1.4 folds change) of OBPL was observed following indoles stimulation, compared to the downregulated level (0.6-0.8 folds change) of NPC2 under the same circumstances. The OBPL and NPC2 gene from H. longicornis were successfully cloned and expressed as inclusion proteins respectively. The purified OBPL (20.28 kDa) showed higher affinity for both indole (Ki 2.256μM) and 3-methylindole (Ki 4.191μM) than NPC2 in the competitive fluorescence binding assays with 1-NPN as a competitor.

Conclusions

Facilitated by the olfactory OBPL protein in Haller’s organ, H. longicornis smells and is attracted to the characteristic indolic scents of hosts induced by SFTSV infection. Olfactory associations between infected hosts and vector arthropods could provide a new perspective to understand host foraging behavior and design novel control strategies for tick-borne diseases based on pathogen-induced scent according to chemical ecology theory.

Authors’ summary

The olfactory perception of characteristic scent emitted by infected hosts is a critical component in comprehending the ticks’ foraging behavior, and consequently, formulating odor-based methodologies to combat tick-borne diseases. In this study, two salient infection scents, indole and 3-methylindole, were identified from the Ifnar-/- mice infected by Bandavirus dabieense (SFTSV) with differential volatile metabolite assays. The two indolic scents were then validated for their olfactory response of H. longicornis by a combination of field studies, laboratory experiments, and molecular analyses. We conclude that H. longicornis smell the characteristic scents from the SFTSV-infected hosts using its unique OBPL protein in the olfactory apparatus (Haller’s organ) and adjusts the tick’s foraging behavior to target infected subjects. The findings of this study offer insights into the intricate interactions between ticks, their hosts, and pathogens, which could inform novel strategies for the prevention of tick-borne diseases such as SFTS.

Introduction

Ticks are obligate, temporary ectoparasitic blood feeders on vertebrates and are the primary vector of diverse microbial agents among hematophagous arthropods. The ability to locate and detect vertebrate hosts is a crucial aspect of the tick’s survival, as it provides a source of nutrition. Hard ticks typically employ two main strategies when locating vertebrate hosts. They are ambush strategists and host-hunting strategists [1]. The ambush strategists are able to detect cues indicative of the presence of a vertebrate host, including CO2 [2], odorants [3,4], body heat [5], infrared radiation [6], and vibrations [7]. They then proceed to climb onto the host in order to locate a suitable feeding site for attachment. In contrast, the host-hunting strategists exhibit a pronounced tendency to actively seek out vertebrate hosts, responding to a wide range of cues derived from the hosts. Actually, most tick species may use one or both strategies, and often alter them during host-foraging periods depending on their life stages [1]. Consequently, the ticks of both strategies respond in a tactical and precise way to different olfactory cues from their respective hosts. During the host-foraging period, the primary sense employed by ticks for locating hosts is olfaction, utilizing chemoreceptors situated on the Haller’s organs on the foreleg tarsi [8]. These receptors allow ticks to detect a wide range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which then inform appetitive behaviors, such as questing and movement towards vertebrate hosts [9]. At present, a number of VOCs have been identified in a range of biological samples, including host dermal pelage [9], breath (e.g., CO2, and 1-octen-3-ol) [2,3], secretions [10] from diverse glands [4], urine [3], and feces [11]. With the increasing VOCs identified, endotrophic or ectotrophic microbiota of host animals has been the subject of considerable attention. These microbes produce and release diverse volatile metabolites that may function as host VOCs cues, thereby prompting synergistic attraction of competent vector arthropods to infected hosts, which in turn facilitates pathogen transmission. The majority of ectotrophic microbiota are currently found to be breeding on host skin, lipids, furs and diverse glands, creating a complex microenvironment that is favorable for the particular ectotrophic microbiota in question. This process is facilitated by the secretion of lipids, salts, enzymes, antimicrobial peptides and a plethora of other chemical compounds [12]. For example, the preference for Propionibacterium in sebaceous gland ecotones, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Aspergillus and Flavobacterium in damp or dry environments are usually reported to produce diverse metabolites (acetophenone etc.) that may serve as host semiochemical cues for foraging arthropod vectors [13]. These metabolites include acids, fatty acid derivatives, aldehydes, and sulfur- and nitrogen-containing compounds [14,15], which are readily diffused and employed as informative VOCs to manipulate vectorial arachnids and insects due to their low molecular weight (< 300 Da) and high vapor pressure (0.01 kPa at 20°C). Consequently, the ectotrophic microbiota produces unique olfactory signals that alter the perception of host animals, thereby influencing their attractiveness to hematophagous arthropods [16,17]. Furthermore, endotrophic microorganisms of host animals may also exert a considerable influence on the foraging behavior of hematophagous vectors. The impact of diverse pathogens or endotrophic microbes on vector-borne disease control has been a significant area of concern within the context of a novel proposed control strategy. This strategy aims to reduce host attractiveness and, as a consequence, block the transmission of pathogens. Recent studies have yielded fascinating insights into the relationship between hosts infected with Dengue, Zika viruses and mosquito behavior [17]. The results indicate that viral infection inhibits RELM-α, a major antimicrobial peptide (AMP) in the host skin, and leads to a perturbation of the skin microbiota. This led to the release of specific host-produced VOCs, such as acetophenone, which increased mosquito attraction and facilitated virus transmission [17,18]. In addition to these viral agents, similar characteristic VOCs of infected hosts have also been evaluated in the presence of Borrelia afzelii [19] and Anaplasma phagocytophilum [11] in vector ticks, and for Plasmodium falciparum [20,21] in mosquitoes, and for L. infantum in sand flies Lutzomyia longipalpis [22], and for Trypanosoma vivax in tsetse flies Glossina pallidipes [23] respectively. Thus, these characteristic host VOCs, induced by specific pathogens or endosymbionts, facilitate pathogen transmission by attracting more competent vector arthropods through the tripartite pathogen-host-vector interactions. For example, host VOCs induced by P. falciparum gametocyte parasitizing in erythrocytes, attracted 2.5 times more Anopheles spp. mosquitoes than non-induced groups [21]. Significantly different levels of VOCs compositions (i.e., α-pinene and 3-carene) were detected in the breath of malaria victims [24,25]. The increased attractiveness of Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes to mice infected with P. chabaudi and a clear difference in the VOCs production profiles between infected vs non-infected mice [26], suggest that the cause-effect relationship between pathogens and altered host metabolites mediating the seeking behavior of arthropod vectors. As further examples, the heavy burden of immature Ixodes ricinus on Myodes glareolus infected with Borrelia afzelii was found [19] and Ixodes hexagonus on the Anaplasma phagocytophilum positive hedgehog Erinaceus europaeus [11] had been documented and explained by the increased levels of VOCs (aromatic heterocyclic compounds) in urine (mice) and the feces (hedgehog) of infected hosts [11]. Vector-borne pathogens alter infected hosts’ VOC profiles to make them more attractive to blood-seeking vectors, increasing vector-borne disease transmission. Such an intriguing ecological hypothesis would be supported by more scientific evidence from sandflies [27], tsetse flies [23,28,29], tabanids [30], kissing bugs [31] and other hematophagous arthropods. However, more detailed mechanisms have yet to defined. In these circumstances, the distinctly different profiles of the volatile metabolites produced by endotrophic or ectotrophic microbes may result in a synergistic attraction that is greater than the sum of their individual effects. And the identification of characteristic VOCs produced by infected hosts would be a useful tool for the discrimination of infected hosts from non-infected hosts and for the diagnosis of vector-borne pathogens [32]. With diverse and dense olfactory receptors in their antennae, mosquito senses unique CO2, NH3 or other VOCs and guide themselves through different stages with oviposition or host foraging behaviors. Conceivably then, olfactory interactions between characteristic VOCs and specific odorant receptors or odorant binding proteins may also inform the tick’s search tactics for a favorable host. Our epidemiological surveys for SFTSV in the field had shown a significantly higher burden of immature H. longicornis on the infected rodents, indicating H. longicornis was attracted to and parasitized on the SFTSV-positive hosts compared to the SFTSV-negative groups (S1 Fig). We therefore tested the hypothesis that H. longicornis is captured by or attracted to SFTSV-infected hosts and whether the attraction of H. longicornis is mediated by host odor induced by SFTSV infection.

Methods and materials

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was granted by Institutional Review Board in the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Peoples Liberation Army P. R. China (AMMS-IRW-202000036). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Bandavirus dabieense: Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) Xinyang strain: (Accession no. JQ341188,JQ341189 and JQ341190 for N, S, L, directly submission): a virus strain isolated from a patient from Shangcheng County, Xinyang City, Henan Province, China.

Ticks: SFTSV-free Haemaphysalis longicornis: H. longicornis ticks originally collected from Changping District, Beijing, China, were maintained at the insectary of AMMS at 26°C with 85% humidity under a 12/12h light/dark photoperiod. All the tick individuals were harvested from SFTSV-free maternal adults and the subsequent offspring were sampled to verify the negative infection of SFTSV by the specific RT-PCR screening. Unfed nymphs were used in the experiments at the age between 10–20 days post-molt.

Ifnar-/- mouse

Homozygous Ifnar-/- mice, female, aged 6–8 weeks, were purchased from Cyagen Biosciences Inc (Guangzhou, China). All experiments were performed using institutional guidelines for animal care and experimentation under the official approvals obtained prior to the in vivo assays.

Surveillance of tick burden on Apodemus agrarius in SFTSV endemic area

Apodemus agrarius mice were trapped in Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province from 12 June, 2018–14 June, 2020 using perforated Sherman traps (LFAHD folding trap, 7.62 × 8.89 × 22.86 cm, Sherman Traps, Inc, US) baited with peanut butter, sunflower seeds and apples. Traps were placed in the late afternoon and processed the following morning. The number of trap squares used (4 traps per square, with an inter-trap distance of 20m) depended on the sample size. We calculated the rodent abundance index per 100 traps as the sum of rodents over the trapping effort to control for the differences in trapping effort between sampling sites. Power analysis showed that a capture success of 10% to 25% at each sampling site was sufficient for evaluation. The captured rodents were delivered to the laboratory, and anesthetized in a closed container with ether or chloroform for about 10min to prevent the escape and bite of various parasites on the rodent body surface, then A. agrarius mice were morphologically identified according to the identification pictures of common medical vectors [33], as they were the most common rodent species and potential host reservoir of SFTSV in our sampling sites. After anesthesia with isoflurane, the mice were thoroughly checked for all ticks with fine forceps. Ticks harvested were counted and identified to species and life stage by morphological characteristics following the taxonomic key developed by Teng and Jiang [34]. The mice were also dissected to obtain liver, spleen and lung tissues which were preserved at liquid nitrogen until further processing.

Experimental infected Ifnar-/- Mice with SFTSV

Female Ifnar-/- mice (n = 6/group) were intraperitoneally injected with SFTSV (Xinyang strain) at a tissue culture infectious dose of 50 (TCID50) per mouse, as these doses ensured mouse survival after challenge and would benefit subsequent sample collection and observations, an equivalent volume of PBS was used as a control [35]. Body weight changes, anal temperatures, and SFTSV RNA loads were monitored daily for 12 days immediately after SFTSV infection. SFTSV RNA loads in tail vein blood samples were determined by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) as described below.

Fecal and urine samples collected from SFTSV-infected Ifnar-/- mice

The fecal and urine samples were collected from Ifnar-/- mice infected and noninfected with SFTSV. After SFTSV RNA loads > the initial infection dose in the challenged mouse, the mouse was individually placed into a sterilized Tecniplast E-Chiller cabinet (Tecniplast, China) to collect the fresh fecal and urine samples at 4°C. About 0.2g of fecal samples were taken in 1mL falcon tubes, homogenized and centrifuged (50,000 × g at 10°C for 2h), the supernatant is collected. The urine samples of 0.2mL in falcon tubes were centrifuged to remove any debris (50,000 × g at 10°C for 15min). At the time of solid phase microextraction (SPME) analysis, each vial of fecal water or urine samples was placed in 60°C for 5min, then exposed to 120μm DVB/CWR/PDMS fiber (Agilent) for 15min at 60°C.

GC-MS analysis for differential volatile metabolites (DVMs) in infected Ifnar-/- mice

After sampling, desorption of the VOCs from the fiber coating was carried out in the injection port of the GC apparatus (Model 8890; Agilent) at 250°C for 5 min in the splitless mode. The identification and quantification of VOCs was carried out using an Agilent Model 8890 GC and a 7000D mass spectrometer (Agilent), equipped with a 30m × 0.25mm × 0.25μm DB-5MS (5% phenyl-polymethylsiloxane) capillary column. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a linear velocity of 1.2mL/min. Temperatures for inlets and MS source were taken as 250°C and 230°C, respectively. The oven temperature was programmed from 40°C (3.5min), increasing at 10°C/min to 100°C, at 7°C/min to 180°C, at 25°C/min to 280°C, hold for 5min. Mass spectra were recorded in electron impact (EI) ionization mode at 70eV. The quadrupole mass detector, ion source and transfer line temperatures were set at 150, 230 and 280°C respectively. The ion monitoring (SIM) mode of the MS was selected for the identification and quantification of the analytes. Briefly, the total ion chromatogram was obtained and then the mass spectra were identified. The detected metabolite peaks were identified using the NIST08 (National Institute of Standards and Technology) mass spectral library, and the extracted compounds were aligned and normalized to the internal standard ribityl [36]. (1) Principal component analysis (PCA). Unsupervised PCA was performed using the prcomp statistical function within R (www.r-project.org). The data were unit variance scaled prior to unsupervised PCA. (2) Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC). The HCA results of samples and metabolites were presented as heatmaps with dendrograms, while the PCC between samples was calculated by the corfunction in R. Both HCA and PCC were carried out by R package Complex-Heatmap. For HCA, normalized signal intensities of metabolites (unit variance scaling) are visualized as a color spectrum. (3) Selected differential metabolites. For the paired group analysis, differential volatile metabolites (DVMs) were determined by variable importance in the projections (VIP) (VIP > 1) and absolute Log2Fold Changes (|Log2FC|) ≥ 1.0. VIP values were extracted from the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) results, including score plots and permutation plots, generated using the R package MetaboAnalystR [37]. The data were logistically transformed (log2) and mean centroided prior to PLS-DA. A permutation test (200 permutations) was performed to avoid overfitting. (4) KEGG Annotation and Enrichment Analysis. Identified metabolites were annotated using the KEGG compound database (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/compound/), the annotated metabolites were subsequently mapped to the KEGG pathway database (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/pathway.html). Pathways with significantly regulated metabolites mapped were then fed into MSEA (metabolite sets enrichment analysis), their significance was determined by hypergeometric test P-values.

SFTSV screening

SFTSV was tested in samples of live ticks and mouse tissues (liver, spleen and lung). Samples were homogenized and centrifuged. Total nucleic acids (including RNA and DNA) were extracted from the homogenates using a Viral RNA MiniKit (52904) (QIAGEN, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR assays for the target genes were then performed using the Takara one-step RT-PCR kit (Takara, Japan) [38]. The total volume of the reaction system of SFTSV was 25 μL, including 2 × reaction mix 12.5 μL, probe (10 μM) 0.3 μL, upstream and downstream primers (S2 Table) (10 μM) 0.5 μL, RNA template 5 μL, enzyme mix 1.0 μL, and deionized water supplement. The cycling parameters were 50°C for 30min (one cycle), 95°C for 10min (one cycle), 95°C for 15s and 60°C for 45s (40 cycles). Cycle threshold values of SFTSV was set as ≤35. Data were analyzed using the software supplied by the manufacturer.

Choice tests

H. longicornis nymphs were allowed to choose between Y-tube olfactometer [1] arms by random assignment, with one arm containing SFTSV-positive Ifnar-/- mice, healthy mice or DVM candidates (indole or 3-methylindole), and the other arm as an air control. The flow of odor-laden air was maintained at a rate of 0.2L/min for 2 min before the tests began. Each tick that proceeded 8.0 cm or more into either a treatment or control side arm as its first choice within 12min was considered a responder. All other ticks were considered non-responders.

Potent electrophysiological responses of H. longicornis to volatile indole compounds

H. longicornis nymphs were subjected to test the olfactory response with EAD following Josek’s protocol [39]. Briefly, the tick individual was attached ventrally to a circular metal plate (Ø 1 cm) with double-sided adhesive tape. Both the indifferent and the recording electrodes were filled with 10−2M KCl and 1% solution of polyvinylpyrolidone K90 (Fluka, Switzerland). The indifferent electrode, connected to the ground via a chloridized wire, was inserted in the region posterior to the scutum, after piercing it with a fine forceps. One of the forelegs was orientated to expose the anterior sensilla of Haller’s organ and immobilized with an adhesive tape. Pedal nerves of the forelegs were destroyed by pinching the coxa with fine forceps to prevent muscle activity during electrophysiological recording. In order to improve contact, the tips of the distal knoll sensilla were cut with metal knives fitted on micromanipulators. Preparation of the ticks and subsequent imaging were performed under visual control (Leica MZ12 stereomicroscope, 350 × magnification). Prior to imaging, the tip of the sensillum was cut with a piece of a razor blade in a holder mounted in a micromanipulator (NMN25, Narishige) under visual control. Recordings from the olfactory receptors were accomplished with glass electrodes connected to a high-input impedance preamplifier (10×) (Syntech INR-5, Hilversum) and brought into contact with the cut tip of the sensillum with the aid of micromanipulators. The recordings were sampled (13,714.3samples/s) and filtered (10–3000Hz, with 50/60Hz suppression) via USB-IDAC connection to a computer (Syntech, Hilversum). At least 10 ticks were tested with both indole and 3-methylindole at concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10 and 100μg/mL. The action potentials were extracted as digital spikes according to top–top amplitudes, using the Autospike software (version 3.9, 16 June, 2009, Syntech NL). The recording duration was 10s, and the stimulus was applied 500ms after the start of the recording. Responses were evaluated according to the difference in the number of spikes between the 500ms stimulation period and the 500ms period before the start of stimulation (dsf = difference in spike frequencies). One-way analysis of variance with repeated measurements (ANOVAR) followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc correction test was used to analyze the mean dsf discharged at each concentration of each treatment (substance tested), using the SPSS 17.0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was achieved when P < 0.05. Odorants that elicited a significantly higher dsf than the blank stimulus were considered active. Two-way ANOVAR with Bonferroni’s post hoc correction test was used to compare the effects of pairs of stimulating odorants. In cases where the sphericity assumption was violated, Greenhouse-Geisser (G-G) or Huynh-Feldt (H-F) corrections were applied when ε’ > 0.75 or ε’ < 0.75, respectively.

Monitoring the transcript level of candidate olfactory proteins with qRT-PCR

The transcript profiles for OBPL and NPC2 during the induction of indole and 3-methylindole at different concentrations were measured by quantitative RT-PCR using an ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The housekeeping gene, β-actin, was used to normalize target gene expression and to correct for sample-to-sample variation. TaqMan primers (Table 1) for the amplification of β-actin, NPC2 and OBPL were reported by Cui et al. (2022) [40]. For the qRT-PCR reaction, cDNA was diluted to 200ng/mL. Each reaction was performed in a 20μL final volume containing 10.0μL TB Green Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa), 0.8μL of each primer (10mM), 0.5μL probe (10 mM), 0.4μL Rox Reference Dye II, 2μL sample cDNA (200ng) and 6.0μL sterilized H2O. The reaction cycling parameters were as follows: 95°C for 30 s, then 40 cycles at 95°C for 5s and 60°C for 34 s. And then, the reaction of 95°C for 15s, 60°C for 1min and 95°C for 15s was added to establish the melting curve. For data reproducibility, reactions were performed in triplicate, and three biological replicates were assessed. Negative controls were non-template reactions (sterilized H2O instead of cDNA). According to the method described, the relative quantification of the target genes’ transcripts between different treatments was calculated using the comparative 2^(-△△Ct) method [39] with thresholds of |Log2Fold Change| ≥ 0.2, and P-value≤0.05 set significant differences. Comparative analyses of the transcript level of target genes amongst different treatments were conducted using a one-way nested analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. The relative mRNA transcript levels in nymphs’ forelegs between treatments were compared using Student’s t-test. All analyses were conducted using SPSS STATISTICS version 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Annotation of candidate olfactory proteins and their predicted 3D structures

Total foreleg RNA was isolated by trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to construct cDNA library using the Creator SMART cDNA Library Construction Kit (Clontech, Mountain, CA, USA). The cDNA library was sequenced with Illumina sequencer. Candidate OBPL and NPC2 genes were identified by BlastX and MotifSearch program. OBPL and NPC2 protein sequences identified in H. longicornis and others reported in arthropod’s species were aligned using ClustalX 1.83 respectively. The putative N-terminal signal peptides were predicted by the SignalP V5.0 program (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) [41]. A Swiss model method [42] was used to search structural templates for the two candidate olfactory proteins. Several identified OBPs structures were used as templates to construct 3D structures for the two candidates, the one with the highest score of Profiles-3D was retained. The Profiles-3D method and Ramachandran plot were used to evaluate the rationality of the established 3D model [43]. Molecular docking was performed by the on-line program SWISSDOCK using default parameters [44], the docking scores of AC and SwissParam were used to evaluate the fitness of ligand and target proteins [45].

Expression and purification of recombinant OBPL and NPC2 proteins

Two specific primer sets are designed to clone the coding region of OBPL/NPC2 in H. longicornis as followed: OBPL-F: 5‘- GTCATATGGCTGCCACGTACACGTCC-3’, OBPL-R: 5‘-TGAAGCTTTCAGTGGCTTC CGGGCAA-3’; NPC2-F: 5‘- AACATATGAAATACTACACGGATTG-3’, NPC2-R: 5‘- AAGAAT TCTTATTGTATCTTGGCGGC-3’ (Underlined showed Nde I and Hind III enzyme sites in the forward and reverse primer, respectively.) The PCR products were cloned into the bacterial expression vector pET28b (Promega, Madison, WI) between the Nde I and Hind III restriction sites, and verified by sequencing (S6 Fig). Plasmid containing the correct insert was extracted and transformed into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) competent cells. A verified single colony was grown overnight in 50mL LB broth (including 100mg/mL Kanamycin). Five liters of LB medium was inoculated with the 50mL overnight culture at 37°C for 2–3 hours until the absorbance at OD600 reached 0.6. The proteins were then induced with isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactopryranoside (IPTG) with a final concentration of 1 mM at 37°C for 6h. The bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (8000g, 10min), resuspended in the lysis buffer (80mM Tris-HCl, 200mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA, 4% glycerol, pH7.2, 0.5mM PMSF), lysed by sonication (10sec, 5 passes) and centrifuged again (12000g, 10min). The soluble fraction and the whole pellet were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and found the target proteins mainly present in the inclusion bodies. Insoluble proteins were washed with 0.2% triton X-100 in 50mM Tris buffer (pH6.8) and then dissolved in 6M guanidinium hydrochloride, the protein refolding protocols performed using the redox methods [46]. Soluble and refolded target proteins were purified with two rounds of Ni-21 ion affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare), and the His-tag was removed using recombinant enterokinase (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA) respectively. The highly purified protein was desalted through extensive dialysis, and the size and purity of the recombinant protein were confirmed by 15% SDS-PAGE. The concentration of the purified target proteins was measured by the Bradford method using BSA as standard protein [47].

Fluorescence competitive binding assay

Both indole and 3-methylindole were selected for fluorescence competitive binding assays according to the DVMs with significant olfactory responses in SFTSV infected mice. This experiment was performed on an F-380 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Gangdong Sci & Tech Development. Co., Ltd, Tianjin, China) at room temperature (25°C) with a 1 cm light path quartz cuvette and 10-nm slits for excitation and emission. The excitation wavelength was 337nm, and the emission spectrum was recorded between 390 and 460nm. The dissociation constants of OBPL or NPC2 with the fluorescent probe 1-NPN was measured, and a final concentration of 2mM protein solution in 50mM Tris-HCl (pH7.4) was titrated with aliquots of 1mM 1-NPN dissolved in methanol to final concentrations ranging from 1 to 16mM. The binding affinities of the chemicals were tested through competitive binding assays using 1-NPN as the fluorescent reporter at a concentration of 2mM, and the concentration of each competitor was varied from 0 to 32mM. The fluorescence intensities at the maximum fluorescence emission between 390 and 460nm were plotted against the free ligand concentration to determine the binding constants. The bound chemical was evaluated based on fluorescence intensity with the assumption that the protein was 100% active, with a saturation stoichiometry of 1:1 (protein: ligand). The binding curves were linearized using a Scatchard plot, and the dissociation constants of the competitors were calculated from the corresponding IC50 values based on the following equation: KD= [IC50]/(1+ [1-NPN]/K1-NPN), where [1-NPN] is the free concentration of 1-NPN and K1-NPN is the dissociation constant of the complex protein/1-NPN [48].

Statistical analysis

Data from qPCR and EAD tests were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). ANOVA and Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD, P = 0.05) were used to determine differences in OBPL or NPC2 mRNA levels or whether EAD recordings were significant among different treatment groups. The t-test was employed to evaluate significant differences in OBPL or NPC2 mRNA levels in the forelegs of H. longicornis between different treatments.

Results

High H. longicornis burden on SFTSV-positive Apodemus agrarius in field trials

In our field trials, a total of 262 Apodemus agrarius (178 males and 84 females) were trapped and 19.84% (35 males and 17 females) were infested with immature H. longicornis ticks. Of the infested mice, 44 individuals (30 males and 14 females) were tested SFTSV positive and 8 (5 males and 3 females) were free of SFTSV. There were no significant difference of the tick infestation ratio and SFTSV infection rate between the sexes of A. agrarius. However, A. agrarius suffering from SFTSV infections were likely to carry more H. longicornis ticks than negative ones as both the overall density and intensity of infested immature H. longicornis on SFTSV-positive A. agrarius appear much higher than those on SFTSV-free mice (Pearson Chi-Square test, χ2 = 37.2, P < 0.001). (S1 Fig). The heavy burden of H. longicornis on the SFTSV-positive A. agrarius suggests the infestation predilection of H. longicornis for the infected hosts induced by SFTSV infection. And in the following, we tested our hypothesis that H. longicornis ticks are attracted to the characteristic host clues of SFTSV-positive mice.

Differential volatile metabolites in fecal and urine samples of SFTSV infected Ifnar-/- mice

We established an untargeted GC-MS metabolomics method for fecal and urine samples of Ifnar-/- mice infected with SFTSV. We substantially extracted 672 volatile metabolites including amino acids, phenolics, indoles, dicarboxylic acids and other metabolites of microbial origin from fecal samples (S1 Data). The same method was applied to urine samples and it enabled the detection of 449 volatile metabolites as listed (S2 Data). Two technical replicates were run for each sample and only the metabolites detected in both the cases were listed, demonstrating the reproducibility of the GC-MS method. Under the criteria that VIP value >1 and |Log2FC| ≥ 1.0 [49], the presence of 161 volatile compounds differentially expressed in the fecal samples of the SFTSV-positive were detected (Fig 1A). Of these metabolites, 11 compounds including indoles, phenols and esters were significantly up-regulated, while another 14 compounds including bourbonene, benzaldehyde, cyclohexane and eucalyptol were down-regulated (Fig 1B). The pathways analysis performed also revealed that the differential metabolites were demonstrated close associations with their corresponding pathways although most of the metabolites were involved in more than one pathway. For example, the metabolites of tryptophan metabolism (serotonin, kynurenines, tryptamine and indolic compounds) were the most abundant. In addition, there were 55 differential metabolites in urine samples from SFTSV-positive Ifnar-/- mice, of which 26 were upregulated and 29 were downregulated (S2 Data). The group of SFTSV-infected mice differentially expressed the inflammatory mediator-regulating pathway of the phenyl-TRP channel and phenylalanine metabolism. Among these, the significantly upregulated pathway involving phenylalanine acid, the downregulated pathways involved in eucalyptol (S2A and S2B Fig). Since indoles are recognized as quorum-sensing molecules signaling interspecies even interkingdom that meet the criteria for a perceptible host VOC cue [24], the present study selected two of these DVM candidates, indole or 3-methylindole, to test the potential olfactory response of H. longicornis and bridge the ecological gap between vector ticks and infected host.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Differential volatile metabolites in the fecal sample of SFTSV infected Ifnar-/- mice.

Panel A: volcanic diagram; Panel B: identified DVMs and their fold changes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.g001

3. Indolic compounds trigger the forage behavior of H. longicornis

3.1 Choice test of ticks for indolic compounds.

H. longicornis nymphs were allowed to choose between Y-tube olfactometer arms, with one arm containing SFTSV-positive Ifnar-/- mice, healthy mice or DVM candidates (indole or 3-methylindole), and the other arm as an air control. The binomial tests showed that the ticks significantly chose the arms containing mice or candidate DVMs compared with those with either control air or solvent treatment. H. longicornis ticks chose healthy mice with less frequency than those to infected mice and the candidate DVMs (N = 100, P = 0.03). And the binomial proportion of the ticks’ choices to the two candidate DVMs appeared almost identical to the choices to the SFTSV-infected mice (N = 80, P > 0.5). No significant difference was observed between the proportion of H. longicornis choosing indole or 3-methylindole (N = 40, P > 0.5) (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Nymph H. longicorinis choices in Y-tubes olfactometers.

Indole (40 mg indole in a solution of 98% water and 2% ethanol); 3-methylindole (40 mg 3-methylindole in a solution of 98% water and 2% ethanol); solvent (2% ethanol, 98% water). Healthy mouse (healthy Ifnar-/- mouse); SFTSV-mouse (SFTSV infected Ifnar-/- mouse).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.g002

Electrophysiological responses of H. longicornis to indole and 3-methylindole.

The stimulation from both indole and 3-methylindole could trigger the significant electrophysiological responses via Haller’s organ in H. longicornis (S3 Fig). The active potential (AP) in olfactory circuits were shown as high as 0.18-0.28mV while the solvent control group merely yield 0.051-0.071mV AP. Compared with the control group, the differences in the EAD response values of indole and 3-methylindole to H. longicornis was demonstrated much higher than control with statistical significance (F(2, 30) = 231.4 P < 0.0001), while no significant difference between the groups of indole and 3-methylindole (F(1, 20)=0.005833, P = 0.8336). Moreover, there were also no significant difference of AP obtained among the different concentrations (0.1μg/mL, 1μg/mL, 10μg/mL and 100μg/mL) of indole (F(4, 40) = 0.9825, P = 0.4175) and 3-methylindole (F(4, 40) = 0.4958, P = 0.7075) respectively.

The predicted 3D structural models and the ligand binding properties of NPC2 and OBPL in H. longicornis

To investigate the mechanisms of the specific attraction behavior, the olfactory genes had been retrieved from the transcriptomics data of H. longicornis achieved previously. As results, we failed to obtain any odorant receptor (OR) genes and odorant binding proteins (OBP) genes, which were popularly in insects of many kinds. Fortunately, a total of 8 transcripts obtained in the transcriptomics data of H. longicornis, which were categorized into 3 groups, NPC2, OBPL and Microplusin-like (ML), based on their sequences’ identity, motif similarity (S4 Fig) and following 2D and 3D structures. With the on-line program SWISS-MODEL, the NPC2 protein structures were predicted based on the crystal structure of Bovine NPC2 (PDB ID code 1NEP) [50] due to their highest identity (95.0%) and the largest coverage of amino acid sequences (Fig 3A). The most reliable 3D model indicated that NPC2 of H. longicornis possesses an β-sandwich fold consisting of two orthogonally arranged β-sheets (ca. 30° rotation) in the helical region (S3 Table). The first β-sheet has three β-strands (β2, β4, and β6) and the second sheet has four β-strands (residues β5, β7, β8, and β9). The fourth and fifth β-strands are connected by a short half-turn α-helix (η1). There are three disulfide bonds connecting residues Cys64 in coil1 and Cys177 in β9 (S1); Cys79in α1 and Cys83 in β3 (S2); Cys130 in the η1 and Cys136 (S3). The innermost cavity in the helical region of NPC2 is formed by the following residues: Val74, Leu94, Glu95, Leu150, Val163, Trp165, and Phe178 and thought to control access of ligands to the polar-faced, water-lined internal cavity [50] (S5A and S5B Fig) although several small cavities present in the ‘bottom’ part of the hydrophobic core of NPC2 protein. Another cavity, formed by residues Phe107, Leu151, Val152, Leu153, Phe67, and Val180, is noticed connected to a pocket on the surface of the protein, formed by Ser116, Leu120, Phe122, Glu155, Phe156, and Pro101 residues, through a small opening topped by a ‘gate’ formed by Phe-156 and Phe-66. We speculate that, for larger ligand to bind, the gate would have to open up and the two β-sheets. Similarly, the 3D structure of H. longicornis OBPL protein were also predicted using the on-line program SWISS-MODEL based on the crystal structure of a classic OBP (PDB ID code 7NYJ) [51] from Varroa destructor as their paired identity and coverage of amino acids sequences (Fig 3B). The scores of global model quality estimation (GMQE) and QMEAN were 0.52 and -3.65, respectively. Therefore, the predicted model of OBPL seems reasonable and reliable (S3 Table). As shown in the secondary structure, H. longicornis OBPL is composited of signal peptide (1–23aa), 5 α helices, 2 β folds and 2 TTs. The five α-helices locate at residues Lys48-Lys64 (α1), Glu75-Ser92 (α2), Phe104-Asn113 (α3), Glu121-Lys 138(α4), Phe143-Cys162 (α5), and three disulfide bonds connect Cys47 in coil1 and Cys167 in α5 (S1); Cys67 in α1 and Cys94 in α2 (S2); Cys137 in the α4 and Cys158 in the α5 (S3). The hydrophobic residues Phe15, Leu58, Phe59, Ala62, Val64, Leu73, Leu76, Ala79, Leu80, Ala88, Leu89, Gly92, Leu 96, Phe123, Leu124 and Ile125 from helices 1, 3, 4, 5, and loops between helices 3 and 4, and 5 form the binding cavity (S5C and S5D Fig). Interestingly, the C-terminus is pulled to the core of the protein to form part of the binding pocket wall, which can function as a “lid” for the release of ligands. The overall fold of five helices knitted together by three disulfide bridges and containing a hydrophobic binding cavity has been observed in OBPL of H. longicornis.

thumbnail
Fig 3. The putative secondary structure of NPC2 and OBPL derived from H. longicornis.

Panel A: NPC2; Panel B: OBPL.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.g003

We also utilized molecular docking (SwissDock) to analyze the interactions between two putative ligands, indole and 3-methylindole with NPC2 and OBPL respectively. The results showed that all two ligands were located in the binding cavity of OBPL but interacted with different amino acids from the α-helical and motifs of loop regions in H. longicornis OBPL. The van der Waals interactions from hydrophobic residues and the hydrogen bonds formed by oxygen-containing functional groups and hydrogen donor residues are important linkages between the two ligands and OBPL (Fig 4A and 4B). However, the binding cavity of the two ligands to NPC2 were distinct. Both indole and 3-methylindole bind NPC2 at one surface binding cavity, instead of the buried cavity in the innermost core of OBPL. The van der Waals interactions were mainly formed between carbon-carbon double bonds and the aromatic residue Phe107. Only the indole base is predicted to overlap the center of the NPC2-binding cavity of H. longicornis (Fig 4C and 4D). Thus, the peculiar 3D structure of OBPL in H. longicornis might confer Haller’s organ of H. longicornis with a compact pocket for odorant accommodation from indole or 3-methylindole (S5C and S5D Fig). Since the AC score in SwissDock consists of the CHARMM force field energy plus the FACTS solvation energy terms and provides an estimate of the binding free energy as a weighted sum of the polar and non-polar terms, the affinity of NPC2 (AC score -1.791514 ~ -2.308619) and OBPL (AC score -1.696810 ~ -2.351299) to the indoles were ranked in the same category. Due to its smaller size and weight, indole has a much greater affinity to the same target protein than 3-methylinole as shown in their SwissParam scores.

thumbnail
Fig 4. The protein-ligand interactions of NPC2 and OBPL of H. longicornis to indole and 3-methylindole predicted with Swiss-docking.

Pane A: OBPL- Indole; Pane B: OBPL-3-methylindole; Panel C: NPC2-Indole; Panel D: NPC2-3-methylindole; (viewed and generated by PyMol 2.6.2). blue block: Protein; yellow block: Ligand; red pod: Metal Ion; dash line: Hydrophobic Interaction; blue line: Hydrogen Bond.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.g004

Transcript levels of the NPC2 and OBPL genes in the foreleg of H. longicornis responding to indole and 3-methylindole stimulation

To test the responses of H. longicornis to the stimulations of indole or 3-methylindole, newly molted nymphs of H. longicornis was allowed to exposed to indole or 3-methylindole at different concentrations and then the relative transcript level of the NPC2 and OBPL genes were measured. Results indicated that the relative transcript levels of NPC2 and OBPL genes changed with different patterns. The stimulations of both indole and 3-methylindole resulted in 1.2-1.4 folds change in the transcript level of OBPL gene under the stimulations of lower concentration (1µg/mL and 10µg/mL) (Fig 5). There was no significant difference of the relative transcript level of OBPL observed under the same stimulations. In comparison of OBPL, the NPC2 gene reduced its transcription level to 0.6-0.8 folds change under the stimulations of higher concentration (1µg/mL and 10µg/mL) of indole or 3-methylindole (Fig 5). The up-regulated transcription of OBPL and down-regulated transcription of NPC2 indicates the corresponding associations of indolergic odorants with OBPL in H. longicornis.

thumbnail
Fig 5. The relative transcript level of NPC2 and OBPL in the forelegs of H. longicornis under indoles stimulations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.g005

Specific binding of OBPL with indole or 3-methylindole in vitro

The recombinant expression vector plasmid pET-28b-OBPL was successfully constructed (S6 Fig) and then transfected into host E. coli BL21 (DE3) and optimized host E. coli T7E. When induced by 1 mM IPTG under 37°C, 4h, the OBPL protein was expressed as an inclusion body with a molecular weight ca. 20.28kDa (Fig 6). The similar procedure was also performed for NPC2 protein and achieved its molecular weight ca. 15.34kDa. The purified OBPL or NPC2 (S7 Fig) proteins were submitted to the fluorescence competition binding assays of indole and 3-methylindole to validate the binding of target protein to indolergic odorants. The ligand binding characteristics of recombinant target proteins were demonstrated with competitive fluorescence binding assays with 1-NPN as competitor. The dissociation constant of the OBPL/1-NPN complex was 2.56 μM (Fig 7A) and that of the NPC2/1-NPN complex was 3.18 μM (Fig 7B). Both recombinant OBPL and NPC2 were able to bind the 2 volatile indolergic odorants, the former achieving higher affinities with Ki = 2.256 (2.043-3.135) μM for indole and Ki = 4.191 (3.357-5.277) μM for 3-methylindole (Fig 7C), compared to the moderate affinity obtained by NPC2 with Ki = 10.32 (9.540 to 13.49) μM for indole and Ki = 15.36 (11.153 to 25.85) μM for 3-methylindole (Fig 7D). The Haller’s organ specific expression of the OBPL protein, and its high affinity binding to biologically active volatiles supports a possible functional role of the chemosensory proteins OBPL in the perception of general host derived odorants in H. longicornis. Thus, the Haller’s organ-biased OBPL may mediate host recognition in the H. longicornis and represent new interesting targets for population control in the prevention and control strategies for tick borne diseases.

thumbnail
Fig 6. The expression and purification of OBPL protein derived from H. longicornis in vitro.

Panel A: in vitro expression of OBPL in the recombined plasmid vector; NPE: supernatant DPE: inclusion protein; MW: Marker; Ø: host bacteria (without induction); strain No.1: BL21(DE3) strain; strain No.2: T7E strain.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. The competitive fluorescence binding assays on OBPL/NPC2 to indoles.

Panel A: The dissolution constant of OBPL to 1-NPN; Panel B: the dissolution constant of NPC2 to 1-NPN; Panel C: The binding activity of OBPL to indole and 3-methylindole; Panel D: The binding activity of NPC2 to indole and 3-methylindole.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.g007

Discussion

Upregulated indolic metabolites ameliorate pathogen-induced host damage and promote the foraging behavior of ticks for host

Research into the importance of indoles has increased dramatically, as the crosstalk between hosts and their microbiota is driven by tryptophan metabolites [52]. Various indoles have been shown to reduce bacterial biofilm formation and damage the cell surface by increasing endogenous oxidative stress, thereby inhibiting the growth of various intestinal bacteria including Salmonella, Eberthella, Shigella, Escherichia and others [53]. No wonder Bunnell et al. (2011) reported the significant increases in indole levels in sick hedgehogs suffering from any of 12 different ailments including lungworm (Crenosoma striatum), tapeworm, ringworm, breathing difficulties, hypothermia, and injury [12]. Furthermore, indolic metabolites have also been demonstrated to exert a remarkable effect in combating pathogenic viruses (Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya viruses) through drastic cell immobility and disintegration [54,55]. Viral infection triggers the stimulation of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which induce the production of kynurenine by degrading tryptophan and activating indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1). IDO1 is a multifunctional enzyme and an endogenous immune checkpoint, which impairs effector T cell function, increases regulatory T cell (Treg) population and induces immune tolerance [56]. Alterations in tryptophan metabolism have been shown associated with levels of various anti-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and other interferons (IFNs), which is produced in a rapid and transient manner in response to infection or tissue injury, and contributes to host defense by stimulating acute phase responses, haematopoiesis and immune responses [57]. Accordingly, indolic metabolism benefit the health of the host by antagonizing the proliferation of pathogens, ameliorating pathological damage and modulating host immune system. Through the complex interactions of microbiome-indoles-immune system, indoles achieve their microbiostatic functions and indicate pathological states of hosts by fostering premorbid risk factors. Therefore, the production and release of indoles in the host is an essential outcome of pathogen-host defense interactions, which could serve as a reasonable indicator of the health status of the host [58]. In the present study, the up-regulation of the tryptophan pathway and the elevated indolic metabolites in the SFTSV-infected mice reconfirmed that the production of indoles can be induced by viral infections and that the increased indoles potentially benefit the host with a remarkable amelioration of virological damage. More importantly, our study provides strong evidence that ectoparasitic ticks acutely sense the metabolic changes resulting from the virus-host interaction and then simultaneously trigger or promote the tick’s foraging behavior for the particular host suffering from viral infection. Among these, the perception of elevated indolic metabolites may be a crucial process to charge the tick’s foraging behavior, although the detailed signaling and response processes remain to be elucidated.

Smell of indoles guide tick foraging behavior for infected host

Physiologically, ticks and other blood-feeding arthropods have overlapping receptive fields for many aromatics and heterocyclics [59]. Among these, indole and 3-methylindole, the derivatives from bacterial degradation of tryptophan, were also known to mediate long-range attraction in several culicine and anopheline species [60,61]. The former aids the location of blood host by host recognition, while the latter acts as an oviposition attractant. Indeed, indoles elicit strong physiological responses in adult antennal trichoid sensilla of An. gambiae [62,63], and olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) activation in Ae. aegypti [64], C. quinquefasciatus [60], and C. tarsalis [65]. In addition, 4-methyl-phenol (4-MP or p-cresol), one aromatic compound found in human sweat and hay infusion [65], plays an important role as an attractant for tick’s blood feeding and Aedes, Culex, and Anopheles mosquitoes’ oviposition [60,61,64,65]. However, the function of the indoles to tick’s host foraging, toxin and predator avoidance, egg deposition, and mate selection has yet to be determined. In the present studies, the increased level of indolergic metabolites in the infected host resulted in high levels of H. longicornis infestation, suggesting the possible attractiveness of indoles to host-seeking ticks, which may partially explain the interesting phenomenon that higher tick burdens occur on the sick hedgehogs reported by Bunnell et al. (2011). Although in their later experiment, the addition of indole to the feces of healthy hedgehogs did not attract the ticks tested as expected [12], the announced proposal that ticks may choose their host based on indole linked to the host’s health status, as the attractiveness of these indolergic metabolites to ticks may be masked or inhibited by some unidentified substances and their potential synergistic effects. Most interestingly, indolergic metabolites were also found to attract or repellent to various vector insects with several odorant receptors (ORs) and odorant binding proteins (OBPs) involved, including CquiOBP1 (Culex quinquefasciatus), CquiOR2, CquiOR10, AalbOR10 (Aedes albopictus), AgamOR10 (An. gambiae), and AsinOR10 (An. sinensis) [66]. These include olfactory indolergic receptors, commonly found in mosquitoes and other highly chemo-sensitive insects, which allow this large and diverse taxonomic group to exploit a dazzling array of ecological niches. However, the known olfactory receptors are only present in insects, but not in Arachnida. Thus, the identification of OBP analogous and their appropriated ligands are considered crucial for the chemosensory behavior of the Arachnida species, since they can bind chemical cues and transport them to the appropriate receptors via the sensillum lymph [65]. To the best of our knowledge, efforts afford to identify olfactory associated proteins failed to yield any OBP in Arachnida species instead of NPC2 protein, Microplusin-like (ML) protein and OBPL protein, despite that large numbers of OBPs have been identified in hemipteran insect species [66]. Nowadays, as small soluble proteins belonging to the myeloid differentiation factor 2 (MD-2) related lipid-recognition protein family, NPC2 proteins are functionally similar to odorant binding proteins (OBPs) and involved in chemical communication in arthropods [67,68]. Moreover, the typical β-barrel or sandwich structure of the NPC2 protein, consisting of eight β-helices and a short α-helical segment, can bind the signaling chemicals extensively [69], suggesting a potential function as an olfactory recognition protein in the tick species. Till date, NPC2 has been found in Ixodes ricinus [70], Amblyomma americanum [71], I. scapularis [72], H. longicornis [40], Varroa destructor [73], Pardosa pseudoannulata [74], Camponotus japonicus [69], Helicoverpa armigera [67] and others arthropods [75]. However, the exact odor binding activities and their corresponding upstream and downstream signal transduction molecules of the NPC2 proteins in ticks are still unclear. Similar to NPC2, ML proteins also have been annotated from a foreleg transcriptome analysis [72] of I. scapularis and a proteome analysis of A. americanum [71], as well as large-scale, tick genomic studies [76]. Although they were exclusive and biased expressed in Haller’s organ, a single, comparable ligand-binding site might be insufficient to elucidate the olfactory chemo-sensation role of ML in ticks, although relevant functional experiments have yet to be performed. Till to now, only two foreleg-biased OBPL proteins, OBPL-1 (19 aa; 118 aa) and OBPL-2 (24 aa; 150 aa), that resemble insect odorant-binding proteins were discovered in a chemosensory proteome of A. americanum [71]. Concerning OBPL, a classic OBPL from H. longicornis was fortunately identified and its potential binding properties with indolic ligands were analyzed in our study. Our current functional analysis based on amino acid sequences and three-dimensional folding suggests that the classic OBPL comply with the binding protein criteria for odorant ligands proposed by Pelosi et al. [68]. (1) The classic OBPL presents a signal peptide revealing their secretory nature. (2) the classic OBPLs are made of five α-helical domains connected by short unstructured loops and knitted together in a compact and stable structure by three disulfide bridges [77]. (3) A comparable, central hydrophobic binding cavity predicted enable the classic OBPL with binding activity with appropriated odorant ligands. Together with the relative high expression level of the OBPL in forelegs of H. longicornis, we come to conclude that the classic OBPLs might function as one odorant binding protein to recognize and transport volatile odorant compounds. Indeed, our competitive fluorescent binding assays also confirmed a specific binding preference of the classic OBPLs for indoles, indole and 3-methylindole, with high affinities, which play a notable role in H. longicornis olfactory system.

Control strategies inspired by tick olfactory ecology

Ticks display robust olfactory-driven behaviors as its olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) that innervate the sensilla in the Haller’s organ are able to detect various behavior-modifying semiochemicals extensively [78]. Most of these semiochemicals are distinct but limited range of volatiles from host animals, which can elicit specific behaviors such as host foraging or natural enemy avoidance [79]. For example, meth-cresol shows the strongest electrophysiological response and clearly attracts ticks to feed, while ortho-methylphenol enables ticks to efficiently find a mating partner [79]. Using the delicate and intricate olfactory mechanism, ticks bridge the gap between different pathogens and their hosts, and efficiently spread diverse tick-borne pathogens to humans. Till date, much researches have focused on the determine of tick’s odorant receptors (ORs), OBPs, and their appropriate volatiles, which will lead to the development of odor baits to be used in tick management programs [79]. However, little work has been done to exploit olfactory links between vector ticks and infected hosts under conditions of pathological damage. Since characteristic host odors are usually produced and released during infection with specific microbiota or set of pathogens, a full understanding of the characteristics of tick-borne disease transmission pathways or cycles would help develop scientific control strategies based on characteristic pathogen-driven host odors. Inspired by the close links between vector arthropods and hosts infected with various pathogens as described above, we used olfactory ecology theory to test the semiochemical links between vector ticks and SFTSV-infected hosts. Our studies, for the first time in the sight of olfactory ecology, have successfully revealed the olfactory link between SFTSV infected host and host seeking H. longicornis. Although our results are limited and infantile, the efficient olfactory links between H. longicornis and SFTSV infected mice may not be limited within indolic volatiles. Other differential metabolites should not be excluded bridging the gaps between the vector tick and SFTSV infected hosts. For which, more efforts in detail should be determined in the future. Nevertheless, our preliminary results would pave a way to device a newly control strategy for tick borne disease based on olfactory ecological theory.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Software used in the present study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Primers and probes for SFTSV screening.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. 3D homology modeling parameters for NPC2 and OBPL in Swiss-model.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s003

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. H. longicornis burden on the SFTSV infected Apodemous agrarius.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s004

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Differential volatile metabolites in the urine sample of SFTSV infected infar-/- mice.

Panel A: volcanic diagram of the identified DVMs; Panel B: identified DVMs and their fold changes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s005

(TIF)

S3 Fig. EAD records of Haller’s organ of H. longicornis under the stimulations of indole or 3-methylindole.

Panel A: indole under different concentrations; Panel B: 3-methylindole under different concentrations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s006

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Phylogenetic tree of NPC2 and OBPL among the different taxa of Arachnid species.

Panel A: NPC2 (HaeL NPC2 accession no. PV029724); Panel B: OBPL (HaeL OBPL accession no. PV029725).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s007

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Molecular docking of NPC2 and OBPL of H. longicornis to indole and 3-methylindole predicted with Swiss-docking.

Panel A: NPC2- Indole; Pane B: NPC2–3-methylindole; Pane C: OBPL-Indole; Panel D: OBPL-3-methylindole).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s008

(TIF)

S6 Fig. The identification of recombined expression plasmid of pET-28b-OBPL.

Panel A: the recombined expression plasmid of pET-28b-OBPL; Panel B: the electrophoresis panel of pET-28b-OBPL digested. M: molecular marker, 1–2, the recombined expression plasmid; 3: pVK type 3, blank plasmid pET-28b and target OBPL gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s009

(TIF)

S7 Fig. The purified NPC2 of H. longicornis expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) in vitro.

M: Marker; IN: unpurified mixtures; FT: Fluid flow through empty column; W: PBS buffer; E: 300 mM Mimidazole elution.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s010

(TIF)

S1 Data. Differential volatile metabolites identified in the fecal samples of SFTSV infected infar-/- mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s011

(XLSX)

S2 Data. Differential volatile metabolites identified in the urine samples of SFTSV infected infar-/- mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013139.s012

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Prof. Wuchun Cao in the State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences of People’s Republic of China for his helpful discussions and suggestive review on the article.

References

  1. 1. Long J, Maskell K, Gries R, Nayani S, Gooding C, Gries G. Synergistic attraction of Western black-legged ticks, Ixodes pacificus, to CO2 and odorant emissions from deer-associated microbes. R Soc Open Sci. 2023;10(5):230084. pmid:37206969
  2. 2. Garcia R. Carbon Dioxide as an Attractant for Certain Ticks (Acarina: Argasidae and Ixodidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1962;55(5):605–6.
  3. 3. Sonenshine DE. Pheromones and other semiochemicals of ticks and their use in tick control. Parasitology. 2004;129 Suppl:S405-25. pmid:15938521
  4. 4. Carroll JF. Interdigital gland substances of white-tailed deer and the response of host-seeking ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 2001;38(1):114–7. pmid:11268681
  5. 5. Carr AL, Salgado VL. Ticks home in on body heat: A new understanding of Haller’s organ and repellent action. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221659. pmid:31442282
  6. 6. Mitchell RD 3rd, Zhu J, Carr AL, Dhammi A, Cave G, Sonenshine DE, et al. Infrared light detection by the haller’s organ of adult american dog ticks, Dermacentor variabilis (Ixodida: Ixodidae). Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017;8(5):764–71. pmid:28647127
  7. 7. Süss J, Klaus C, Gerstengarbe F-W, Werner PC. What makes ticks tick? Climate change, ticks, and tick-borne diseases. J Travel Med. 2008;15(1):39–45. pmid:18217868
  8. 8. Carr AL, Mitchell RD III, Dhammi A, Bissinger BW, Sonenshine DE, Roe RM. Tick Haller’s Organ, a New Paradigm for Arthropod Olfaction: How Ticks Differ from Insects. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(7):1563. pmid:28718821
  9. 9. Sonenshine DE, Roe RM. Overview people, ticks, and animal. Biology of Ticks. 2nd ed. Sonenshine DE, Roe RM. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2014. 3–16.
  10. 10. Carroll JF. Responses of three species of adult ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) to chemicals in the coats of principal and minor hosts. J Med Entomol. 1999;36(3):238–42. pmid:10337091
  11. 11. Carroll JF. Kairomonal activity of white-tailed deer metatarsal gland substances: a more sensitive behavioral bioassay using Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 1998;35(1):90–3. pmid:9542351
  12. 12. Bunnell T, Hanisch K, Hardege JD, Breithaupt T. The fecal odor of sick hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) mediates olfactory attraction of the tick Ixodes hexagonus. J Chem Ecol. 2011;37(4):340–7. pmid:21445567
  13. 13. Belkaid Y, Segre JA. Dialogue between skin microbiota and immunity. Science. 2014;346(6212):954–9. pmid:25414304
  14. 14. Grice EA, Kong HH, Conlan S, Deming CB, Davis J, Young AC, et al. Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science. 2009;324(5931):1190–2. pmid:19478181
  15. 15. Smallegange RC, Verhulst NO, Takken W. Sweaty skin: an invitation to bite?. Trends Parasitol. 2011;27(4):143–8. pmid:21256083
  16. 16. Audrain B, Farag MA, Ryu C-M, Ghigo J-M. Role of bacterial volatile compounds in bacterial biology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39(2):222–33. pmid:25725014
  17. 17. De Moraes CM, Stanczyk NM, Betz HS, Pulido H, Sim DG, Read AF, et al. Malaria-induced changes in host odors enhance mosquito attraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(30):11079–84. pmid:24982164
  18. 18. Zhang H, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Peng Y, Peng W, Tong L, et al. A volatile from the skin microbiota of flavivirus-infected hosts promotes mosquito attractiveness. Cell. 2022;S0092-8674(22)00641-9. pmid:35777355
  19. 19. Harris TA, Gattu S, Propheter DC, Kuang Z, Bel S, Ruhn KA, et al. Resistin-like Molecule α Provides Vitamin-A-Dependent Antimicrobial Protection in the Skin. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25(6):777-788.e8. pmid:31101494
  20. 20. van Duijvendijk G, van Andel W, Fonville M, Gort G, Hovius JW, Sprong H, et al. A Borrelia afzelii Infection Increases Larval Tick Burden on Myodes glareolus (Rodentia: Cricetidae) and Nymphal Body Weight of Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 2017;54(2):422–8. pmid:27694145
  21. 21. Stromsky VE, Hajkazemian M, Vaisbourd E, Mozūraitis R, Noushin Emami S. Plasmodium metabolite HMBPP stimulates feeding of main mosquito vectors on blood and artificial toxic sources. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):1161. pmid:34620990
  22. 22. Emami SN, Lindberg BG, Hua S, Hill SR, Mozuraitis R, Lehmann P, et al. A key malaria metabolite modulates vector blood seeking, feeding, and susceptibility to infection. Science. 2017;355(6329):1076–80. pmid:28183997
  23. 23. Magalhães-Junior JT, Oliva-Filho ADA, Novais HO, Mesquita PRR, M Rodrigues F, Pinto MC, et al. Attraction of the sandfly Lutzomyia longipalpis to possible biomarker compounds from dogs infected with Leishmania infantum. Med Vet Entomol. 2019;33(2):322–5. pmid:30652325
  24. 24. Wamwiri FN, Ndungu K, Thande PC, Thungu DK, Auma JE, Ngure RM. Infection with the secondary tsetse-endosymbiont Sodalis glossinidius (Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae) influences parasitism in Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae). J Insect Sci. 2014;14:272. pmid:25527583
  25. 25. Schaber CL, Katta N, Bollinger LB, Mwale M, Mlotha-Mitole R, Trehan I, et al. Breathprinting Reveals Malaria-Associated Biomarkers and Mosquito Attractants. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(10):1553–60. pmid:29415208
  26. 26. Ferguson HM, Read AF. Mosquito appetite for blood is stimulated by Plasmodium chabaudi infections in themselves and their vertebrate hosts. Malar J. 2004;3:12. pmid:15151700
  27. 27. Chelbi I, Maghraoui K, Zhioua S, Cherni S, Labidi I, Satoskar A, et al. Enhanced attraction of sand fly vectors of Leishmania infantum to dogs infected with zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(7):e0009647. pmid:34314425
  28. 28. Liu R, He X, Lehane S, Lehane M, Hertz-Fowler C, Berriman M, et al. Expression of chemosensory proteins in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans is related to female host-seeking behaviour. Insect Mol Biol. 2012;21(1):41–8. pmid:22074189
  29. 29. Olaide OY, Tchouassi DP, Yusuf AA, Pirk CWW, Masiga DK, Saini RK, et al. Effect of zebra skin-derived compounds on field catches of the human African trypanosomiasis vector Glossina fuscipes fuscipes. Acta Trop. 2021;213:105745. pmid:33160957
  30. 30. Blahó M, Egri A, Száz D, Kriska G, Akesson S, Horváth G. Stripes disrupt odour attractiveness to biting horseflies: battle between ammonia, CO₂, and colour pattern for dominance in the sensory systems of host-seeking tabanids. Physiol Behav. 2013;119:168–74. pmid:23810990
  31. 31. Ramírez-González MG, Flores-Villegas AL, Salazar-Schettino PM, Gutiérrez-Cabrera AE, Rojas-Ortega E, Córdoba-Aguilar A. Zombie bugs? Manipulation of kissing bug behavior by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop. 2019;200:105177. pmid:31539526
  32. 32. Chai HC, Chua KH. The Potential Use of Volatile Biomarkers for Malaria Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(12):2244. pmid:34943481
  33. 33. Pan QH, Wang YX, Yan K. Colored atlas of Chinese mammalians. Beijing: China Forestry Press; 2007.
  34. 34. Teng KF, Jiang ZJ. Fasc 39: Acari: Ixodidae. Economic insect fauna of China. Beijing: Science Press; 1991.
  35. 35. Liu Y, Wu B, Paessler S, Walker DH, Tesh RB, Yu X. The pathogenesis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus infection in alpha/beta interferon knockout mice: insights into the pathologic mechanisms of a new viral hemorrhagic fever. J Virol. 2014;88(3):1781–6. pmid:24257618
  36. 36. Jain A, Li XH, Chen WN. An untargeted fecal and urine metabolomics analysis of the interplay between the gut microbiome, diet and human metabolism in Indian and Chinese adults. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9191. pmid:31235863
  37. 37. Pang Z, Chong J, Zhou G, de Lima Morais DA, Chang L, Barrette M, et al. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W388–96. pmid:34019663
  38. 38. Li H, Lu Q-B, Xing B, Zhang S-F, Liu K, Du J, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of laboratory-diagnosed severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China, 2011-17: a prospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(10):1127–37. pmid:30054190
  39. 39. Josek T, Allan BF, Alleyne M. Morphometric Analysis of Chemoreception Organ in Male and Female Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 2018;55(3):547–52. pmid:29309667
  40. 40. Cui Y, Wang J, Liu Q, Li D, Zhang W, Liu X, et al. Identification and expression of potential olfactory-related genes related to Niemann-Pick C2 protein and ionotropic receptors in Haemaphysalis longicornis. Exp Appl Acarol. 2022;87(4):337–50. pmid:35971047
  41. 41. Nielsen H, Teufel F, Brunak S, von Heijne G. SignalP: The Evolution of a Web Server. Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2836:331–67. pmid:38995548
  42. 42. Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W296–303. pmid:29788355
  43. 43. Studer G, Rempfer C, Waterhouse AM, Gumienny R, Haas J, Schwede T. QMEANDisCo-distance constraints applied on model quality estimation. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(6):1765–71. pmid:31697312
  44. 44. Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O. SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Web Server issue):W270-7. pmid:21624888
  45. 45. Bugnon M, Röhrig UF, Goullieux M, Perez MAS, Daina A, Michielin O, et al. SwissDock 2024: major enhancements for small-molecule docking with Attracting Cavities and AutoDock Vina. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W324–32. pmid:38686803
  46. 46. Patra AK, Mukhopadhyay R, Mukhija R, Krishnan A, Garg LC, Panda AK. Optimization of inclusion body solubilization and renaturation of recombinant human growth hormone from Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2000;18(2):182–92. pmid:10686149
  47. 47. Bowen DJ, Ensign JC. Isolation and characterization of intracellular protein inclusions produced by the entomopathogenic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(10):4834–41. pmid:11571191
  48. 48. Moitrier L, Belloir C, Lalis M, Hou Y, Topin J, Briand L. Ligand Binding Properties of Odorant-Binding Protein OBP5 from Mus musculus. Biology (Basel). 2022;12(1):2. pmid:36671695
  49. 49. Wan D, Cheng A, Wang Y, Zhong G, Li WV, Fan H. Analyzing RNA-Seq data from Chlamydia with super broad transcriptomic activation: challenges, solutions, and implications for other systems. BMC Genomics. 2024;25(1):801. pmid:39182031
  50. 50. Friedland N, Liou H-L, Lobel P, Stock AM. Structure of a cholesterol-binding protein deficient in Niemann-Pick type C2 disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(5):2512–7. pmid:12591954
  51. 51. Amigues B, Zhu J, Gaubert A, Arena S, Renzone G, Leone P, et al. A new non-classical fold of varroa odorant-binding proteins reveals a wide open internal cavity. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13172. pmid:34162975
  52. 52. Agus A, Planchais J, Sokol H. Gut Microbiota Regulation of Tryptophan Metabolism in Health and Disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(6):716–24. pmid:29902437
  53. 53. Kumar A, Sperandio V. Indole Signaling at the Host-Microbiota-Pathogen Interface. mBio. 2019;10(3):e01031-19. pmid:31164470
  54. 54. Bardiot D, Koukni M, Smets W, Carlens G, McNaughton M, Kaptein S, et al. Discovery of Indole Derivatives as Novel and Potent Dengue Virus Inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2018;61(18):8390–401. pmid:30149709
  55. 55. Monsalve-Escudero LM, Loaiza-Cano V, Pájaro-González Y, Oliveros-Díaz AF, Diaz-Castillo F, Quiñones W, et al. Indole alkaloids inhibit zika and chikungunya virus infection in different cell lines. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021;21(1):216. pmid:34454481
  56. 56. Suh H-S, Zhao M-L, Rivieccio M, Choi S, Connolly E, Zhao Y, et al. Astrocyte indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is induced by the TLR3 ligand poly(I:C): mechanism of induction and role in antiviral response. J Virol. 2007;81(18):9838–50. pmid:17626075
  57. 57. Liu M, Nieuwdorp M, de Vos WM, Rampanelli E. Microbial Tryptophan Metabolism Tunes Host Immunity, Metabolism, and Extraintestinal Disorders. Metabolites. 2022;12(9):834. pmid:36144238
  58. 58. Lingeman DG, O’Dell KL Jr, Syed Z. Developing attractants and repellents for ticks: promises and challenges. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2024;63:101181. pmid:38401667
  59. 59. Pelletier J, Hughes DT, Luetje CW, Leal WS. An odorant receptor from the southern house mosquito Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus sensitive to oviposition attractants. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10090. pmid:20386699
  60. 60. Blackwell A, Johnson SN. Electrophysiological investigation of larval water and potential oviposition chemo-attractants for Anopheles gambiae s.s. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2000;94(4):389–98. pmid:10945049
  61. 61. Biessmann H, Andronopoulou E, Biessmann MR, Douris V, Dimitratos SD, Eliopoulos E, et al. The Anopheles gambiae odorant binding protein 1 (AgamOBP1) mediates indole recognition in the antennae of female mosquitoes. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9471. pmid:20208991
  62. 62. Meijerink J, Braks MAH, Brack AA, Adam W, Dekker T, Posthumus MA, et al. Identification of olfactory stimulants for Anopheles gambiae from human sweat samples. J Chem Ecol. 2000;26(6):1367–82.
  63. 63. Dekel A, Sar-Shalom E, Vainer Y, Yakir E, Bohbot JD. The ovipositor cue indole inhibits animal host attraction in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15(1):422. pmid:36369215
  64. 64. Du YJ, Millar JG. Electroantennogram and oviposition bioassay responses of Culex quinquefasciatus and Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae) to chemicals in odors from Bermuda grass infusions. J Med Entomol. 1999;36(2):158–66. pmid:10083752
  65. 65. Pelosi P. Odorant-binding proteins. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1994;29(3):199–228. pmid:8070277
  66. 66. Gebremedhin MB, Xu Z, Kuang C, Shumuye NA, Cao J, Zhou Y, et al. Current Knowledge on Chemosensory-Related Candidate Molecules Potentially Involved in Tick Olfaction via Haller’s Organ. Insects. 2023;14(3):294. pmid:36975979
  67. 67. Pelosi P, Iovinella I, Felicioli A, Dani FR. Soluble proteins of chemical communication: an overview across arthropods. Front Physiol. 2014;5:320. pmid:25221516
  68. 68. Ishida Y, Tsuchiya W, Fujii T, Fujimoto Z, Miyazawa M, Ishibashi J, et al. Niemann-Pick type C2 protein mediating chemical communication in the worker ant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(10):3847–52. pmid:24567405
  69. 69. Iovinella I, Ban L, Song L, Pelosi P, Dani FR. Proteomic analysis of castor bean tick Ixodes ricinus: a focus on chemosensory organs. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;78:58–68. pmid:27693516
  70. 70. Renthal R, Manghnani L, Bernal S, Qu Y, Griffith WP, Lohmeyer K, et al. The chemosensory appendage proteome of Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) reveals putative odorant-binding and other chemoreception-related proteins. Insect Sci. 2017;24(5):730–42. pmid:27307202
  71. 71. Josek T, Walden KKO, Allan BF, Alleyne M, Robertson HM. A foreleg transcriptome for Ixodes scapularis ticks: Candidates for chemoreceptors and binding proteins that might be expressed in the sensory Haller’s organ. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018;9(5):1317–27. pmid:29886186
  72. 72. Mani K, Nganso BT, Rodin P, Otmy A, Rafaeli A, Soroker V. Effects of Niemann-Pick type C2 (NPC2) gene transcripts silencing on behavior of Varroa destructor and molecular changes in the putative olfactory gene networks. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2022;148:103817. pmid:35926690
  73. 73. Xiu C, Xiao Y, Zhang S, Bao H, Liu Z, Zhang Y. Niemann-Pick proteins type C2 are identified as olfactory related genes of Pardosa pseudoannulata by transcriptome and expression profile analysis. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2019;29:320–9. pmid:30669056
  74. 74. Zhu J, Guo M, Ban L, Song L-M, Liu Y, Pelosi P, et al. Niemann-Pick C2 Proteins: A New Function for an Old Family. Front Physiol. 2018;9:52. pmid:29472868
  75. 75. Jia N, Wang J, Shi W, Du L, Sun Y, Zhan W, et al. Large-Scale Comparative Analyses of Tick Genomes Elucidate Their Genetic Diversity and Vector Capacities. Cell. 2020;182(5):1328-1340.e13. pmid:32814014
  76. 76. Shukla S, Nakano-Baker O, Godin D, MacKenzie D, Sarikaya M. iOBPdb A Database for Experimentally Determined Functional Characterization of Insect Odorant Binding Proteins. Sci Data. 2023;10(1):295. pmid:37208471
  77. 77. Hess E, Vlimant M. Leg sense organs of ticks. In: Sauer JR, Hair JA. Morphology, physiology, and behavioral biology of ticks. John Wiley & Sons; 1986. 361–90.
  78. 78. Syed Z. Chemical ecology and olfaction in arthropod vectors of diseases. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2015;10:83–9. pmid:29588018
  79. 79. Josek T, Sperrazza J, Alleyne M, Syed Z. Neurophysiological and behavioral responses of blacklegged ticks to host odors. J Insect Physiol. 2021;128:104175.