Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Epigenetic Biomarkers and the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway in Opisthorchis viverrini-associated Cholangiocarcinoma: A Scoping Review on Therapeutic Opportunities

  • Alok Kafle,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Control of Opisthorchiasis, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  • Sutas Suttiprapa ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    sutasu@kku.ac.th

    Affiliations Department of Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Control of Opisthorchiasis, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  • Mubarak Muhammad,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Physiology and Graduate School, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  • Jan Clyden B. Tenorio,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology

    Affiliations Department of Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Control of Opisthorchiasis, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  • Roshan Kumar Mahato,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  • Norhidayu Sahimin,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Tropical Infectious Diseases Research & Education Centre, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Shih Keng Loong

    Roles Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Tropical Infectious Diseases Research & Education Centre, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

Background

Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, are pivotal in regulating gene expression pathways related to inflammation and cancer. While there is substantial research on epigenetic markers in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), Opisthorchis viverrini-induced cholangiocarcinoma (Ov-CCA) is overlooked as a neglected tropical disease (NTD) with limited representation in the literature. Considering the distinct etiological agent, pathogenic mechanisms, and pathological manifestations, epigenetic research plays a pivotal role in uncovering markers and potential targets related to the cancer-promoting and morbidity-inducing liver fluke parasite prevalent in the Great Mekong Subregion (GMS). Emerging studies highlight a predominant hypermethylation phenotype in Opisthorchis viverrini (O. viverrini) tumor tissues, underscoring the significance of abnormal DNA methylation and histone modifications in genes and their promoters as reliable targets for Ov-CCA.

Principal findings

Relevant published literature was identified by searching major electronic databases using targeted search queries. This process retrieved a total of 81 peer-reviewed research articles deemed eligible for inclusion, as they partially or fully met the pre-defined selection criteria. These eligible articles underwent a qualitative synthesis and were included in the scoping review. Within these, 11 studies specifically explored Ov-CCA tissues to investigate potential epigenetic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. This subset of 11 articles provided a foundation for exploring the applications of epigenetics-based therapies and biomarkers for Ov-CCA. These articles delved into various epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, and examined genes with aberrant epigenetic changes linked to deregulated signalling pathways in Ov-CCA progression.

Conclusions

This review identified epigenetic changes and Wnt/β-catenin pathway deregulation as key drivers in Ov-CCA pathogenesis. Promoter hypermethylation of specific genes suggests potential diagnostic biomarkers and dysregulation of Wnt/β-catenin-modulating genes contributes to pathway activation in Ov-CCA progression. Reversible epigenetic changes offer opportunities for dynamic disease monitoring and targeted interventions. Therefore, this study underscores the importance of these epigenetic modifications in Ov-CCA development, suggesting novel therapeutic targets within disrupted signalling networks. However, additional validation is crucial for translating these novel insights into clinically applicable strategies, enhancing personalised Ov-CCA management approaches.

Author summary

This review examines the role of epigenetic changes and the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway in Opisthorchis viverrini-induced cholangiocarcinoma (Ov-CCA). Through an exhaustive analysis of relevant studies, the primary epigenetic alteration identified in Ov-CCA pathogenesis is hypermethylation of tumor suppressor gene promoters. This epigenetic dysregulation shows several affected genes involved in the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, which plays a central role in opisthorchiasis progression. Network analysis revealed an interaction between these genes and β-catenin, suggesting Wnt/β-catenin pathway dysregulation contributes to Ov-CCA development and progression. Most methylated genes act as tumor suppressors by normally inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Targeting this pathway offers therapeutic potential for Ov-CCA. Epigenetic markers hold promise as biomarkers, emphasizing the therapeutic potential of targeting disrupted gene and signalling networks through epigenetic modulators. This approach presents an innovative strategy for developing personalized therapies tailored to the molecular profiles of Ov-CCA patients. However, translating these findings into clinical practice requires rigorous validation and further in-depth exploration. Nonetheless, the insights obtained highlight the crucial necessity for ongoing research on epigenetic-based interventions, intending to enhance both diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness in managing Ov-CCA.

1 Introduction

Liver fluke infections caused by parasites like Clonorchis sinensis, Opisthorchis felineus, and Opisthorchis viverrini (O. viverrini) are significant public health challenges prevalent in Eastern Europe, East Asia, and Southeast Asia [1]. O. viverrini infections are particularly endemic in Southeast Asian nations, including Thailand, Lao PDR, Cambodia, and Vietnam [2]. The association between liver fluke infestation and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is well documented. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified O. viverrini and C. sinensis as Group I agents, recognising them as biological carcinogens [3].

Approximately 10 million individuals in the Great Mekong Subregion (GMS) are believed to be infected with O. viverrini. Over 6 million Thai residents are affected by O. viverrini, with the most significant prevalence in Northeastern Thailand [4]. Liver and bile duct cancer is also one of the top ten diseases associated with high mortality within the Thai population [5]. The elevated occurrence of this concerning issue is intricately linked to the widespread existence of the liver fluke parasite, O. viverrini, thereby substantially heightening the susceptibility to CCA. Unfortunately, many patients in this region are diagnosed with advanced-stage CCA, resulting in an exceptionally high mortality rate [6]. Epigenetic alterations can help provide pivotal insights for early marker discovery, identify altered signalling pathways, and provide alternatives to exploring therapeutic targets.

Over the last twenty years, there has been a recognition of the critical role played by epigenetic mechanisms as key regulators capable of initiating and sustaining cholangiocarcinogenesis [7,8]. However, the understanding of the molecular genetics and epigenetic mechanisms in Opisthorchis viverrini-induced cholangiocarcinoma (Ov-CCA) is limited compared to non-Opisthorchis viverrini-induced cholangiocarcinoma (non-Ov-CCA). Exome sequencing revealed evident differences in mutational patterns between Ov-CCA and non-Ov-CCA [9]. Early cancer detection is crucial, and epigenetic therapy can prevent malignant progression. More importantly, within Ov-CCA, discernible inter-tumor epigenetic heterogeneity offers the potential for tailoring personalised therapy approaches based on methylation or histone modifications [7].

This epigenetic modification hinders transcription of the methylated DNA, ultimately causing gene silencing in Ov-CCA tissues [10]. Although we do not delve into demethylating drugs, palliative chemotherapy, current natural and bioactive compounds, and epigenetic inhibitors involved in ongoing CCA clinical trials (given their absence for Ov-CCA), this review holds the potential to propel advancements in infection prognosis, target markers, and therapeutic monitoring for Ov-CCA. Hence, this scoping review consolidates recent research findings primarily centered on epigenetic markers and their significance in early detection, prognosis assessment, and potential implicated pathways. These insights offer valuable groundwork for future studies centered on epigenetics in the context of liver fluke-induced CCA.

1.1 Rationale

The prognosis for both Ov-CCA and non-Ov-CCA is poor, given their low resection rate and resistance to traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy [11]. Subsequent research endeavours in Ov-CCA and epigenetics have illuminated a recurring theme. Although abnormal promoter hypermethylation is pervasive in tumor development, the specific genes affected exhibit similarity to the distinctive biology of Opisthorchiasis-induced cancer; however, results may vary according to the gender, age, and grade of an individual patient.

Methylation changes disrupt cell signalling pathways, and it’s possible to identify and narrow down affected genes and promoters by focusing on conserved pathways. Until now, there has been no scoping or systematic review of current literature on the role of epigenetic modification in Ov-CCA studies. Therefore, we aim to identify and synthesise all available epigenetic evidence through a scoping review. Exploring the broader landscape of this topic will yield more options than concluding limited evidence, aligning with the scoping review’s ability to map critical concepts, inquire about types of evidence, and identify gaps across a diverse evidence base. This approach offers an overview of the current state and span of research activity. Furthermore, the results underscore the potential for shared mechanisms in Ov-CCA management, emphasising the promise of utilising epigenetic mediators for biomarker discovery, enhancing early detection, and advancing drug development for personalised and combined therapies.

1.2. Objectives

  • To determine key genes and proteins that exhibit altered epigenetic regulation during opisthorchiasis and Ov-CCA development.
  • To elucidate the key cellular signalling pathways affected by abnormal epigenetic alterations in Ov-CCA development and assess the potential of dysregulated epigenetic markers as diagnostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets.
  • To understand the current state of the science regarding epigenetic complications and alterations following Ov-CCA and highlight knowledge gaps in the literature to inform future research priorities in this field.

2. Methods

2.1 Eligibility criteria

This scoping review thoroughly examines studies on individuals diagnosed with Ov-CCA and positive tissue sections. The studies exclusively conducted in cell lines, animal studies, review articles, letters, case reports, or without any epigenetic component were excluded from this review. Only articles published in English were selected. The PCC (Population/Concept/Context) framework is employed to structure key concepts, focusing on the crucial involvement of DNA methylation and histone modifications in Ov-CCA pathogenesis (S1 Table). The exploration extends to identifying epigenetically regulated genes and pathways linked to opisthorchiasis-induced cancer. This nuanced approach contributes to the overall depth and precision of the scoping review and helps identify key characteristics or factors related to a concept.

2.2 Search strategy

The methodology for this study was based on the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive search was conducted across five electronic databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library. The scoping review presents an overview of a potentially large and diverse body of literature on a broad topic. Therefore, search queries were tailored to encompass the broader context of CCA and its associated epigenetic mechanisms: Epigenetics OR Epigenome* AND Bile duct cancer* OR cholangiocarcinoma. Initially, the search included studies on overall CCA, and subsequently, it was refined to focus on Ov-CCA studies that utilised human or human biopsy samples. The last search was done on August 30, 2023.

2.3 Data collection

The primary reviewer (AK), with the assistance of MM, conducted the literature search and compilation process. Any disparities in determining the inclusivity of the articles were deliberated upon, and final decisions were reached in consultation with subject matter experts, RKM, SKL, NS, and SS, who possess the requisite knowledge and expertise in tropical medicine and health science. Subsequently, all citations were imported into the desktop reference management application Endnote Reference Manager. Initially, duplicate citations were manually identified and eliminated, along with any duplicates discovered later in the process. Each citation’s title, abstract, and keywords were carefully assessed for relevance to the study before being exported into an Excel file along with the corresponding citation records. Any justifications for omitting citations were duly documented. Complete versions of articles that met the inclusion criteria were procured for further examination. The Excel data extraction form comprehensively recorded the following details: Author (Year), Population, Epigenetic hallmarks, Type of study, Outcome, Method used to measure Outcome, and Summary of the findings.

3. Results

In this review, we incorporated all studies investigating epigenetic mechanisms in the context of O. viverrini-related CCA. The initial search yielded 1050 records from the four electronic databases. After applying filters specific to each database, duplicates and non-research articles or those not in English were excluded, resulting in 337 remaining records. These were screened based on relevance indicated by their title, abstract, and keywords related to CCA. Additionally, duplicates between databases were removed. Of these, 256 records did not meet the inclusion criteria. Subsequently, 81 records underwent full-text retrieval. The remaining excluded records consist of 12 cell line studies, 49 non-Ov-CCA-based studies, 4 non-epigenetic studies, 2 irrelevant studies, 1 report, 1 review, and 1 study on an unrelated topic. Among these, 11 articles were ultimately included in this review, as they utilised human samples and pertained to the causation of Ov-CCA (Fig 1). Further confirmation of the use of human-infected Ov-CCA tissues was done by sending an e-mail to the corresponding authors of the included studies, as our contextual focus centers on human observational studies conducted in Ov-endemic regions within Southeast Asia and tissue samples collected across diverse stages of disease progression.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flowchart depicting the identification and selection process of studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012477.g001

3.1 Sample size and techniques

In the analysis, a total of 860 clinical samples from patients with Ov-CCA who tested positive for fluke infection were included from 11 selected studies. It’s noteworthy that most of these samples were paraffin-embedded specimens. The core methodologies frequently applied in Ov-CCA methylation studies using these clinical samples include PCR-based techniques, bisulfite sequencing, microarray screening, immunohistochemistry (IHC), quantitative PCR (qPCR), and comprehensive computational analysis (S2 Table). None of the studies conducted interventions involving human subjects.

3.2 Main findings

In our review, two principal epigenetic mechanisms—DNA methylation and histone modifications—have been identified, with DNA methylation predominantly featured in Ov-CCA-based epigenetic research. In our selection of 11 studies focused on Ov-CCA and epigenetic aspects, ten studies primarily investigated methylation patterns, with one study based on histone modifications (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Summary of the findings from 11 included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012477.t001

Additionally, our analysis identified the Wnt/β-catenin pathways as the most prominently affected, both directly and indirectly, in the context of epigenetically dysregulated genes associated with Ov-CCA (Table 2). A more comprehensive understanding of recent updates on inhibitors, antagonists, and activators of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway holds promise as a therapeutic approach, given its prominence in O. viverrini related epigenetic research.

thumbnail
Table 2. Epigenetic alterations in studied genes/proteins and their impact on critical gene pathways in Ov-CCA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012477.t002

3.2.1 DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications: Focusing on Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets.

DNA methylation and histone modifications exhibit remarkable potential as biomarkers for early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring in cancer [12,13]. In Ov-CCA tissues, epigenetic modification hinders transcription of the methylated DNA, causing gene silencing and influencing the broader regulatory landscape of cellular processes [10]. DNA methylation markers are detectable in bodily fluids and offer non-invasive approaches to detect cancer onset and recurrence sensitively [14].

Epigenetic studies in Ov-CCA have demonstrated abnormalities in DNA methylation with promoter hypermethylation observed in several genes, hMLH1 [15], Trop2 [16], RIZ1 [17], EBF1 [18], p14A2RF, p15INK4B, p16INK4A [19], PPP4C (DNA repair), RUNX3, IRF4, UCHL1, TP53I3 (apoptosis), CCND2, RASSF1 (cell proliferation), ALDH1A3, SLC29A1 (drug metabolism), HTATIP2 (angiogenesis) [20], OPCML, SFRP1, HIC1, PTEN, and DcR1 [8], OPCML [21]. At the same time, UCHL1 was the only gene found to be hypomethylated in Ov-CCA [20].

A detailed analysis of the impact of the aforementioned specific genes on cancer development is presented below, emphasising their potential as markers for disease progression and therapeutic targets. It also highlights their potential as markers in disease progression and therapeutic targets. It further explores their direct or indirect involvement in the Wnt signalling pathways within the Ov-CCA pathology and progression context.

hMLH1 (human MutL homolog 1)

The acquisition of genomic instability stands as a pivotal hallmark of cancer cells, with hypermutable phenotypes known as microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair (MMR) representing a significant component of this phenomenon [22,23]. Methylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter region can lead to the silencing of hMLH1 expression, resulting in microsatellite instability (MSI) due to dysfunction of the MMR system [2426]. MMR is crucial for precise genome replication during cell division. Deficiencies in this process can cause mutation rates up to 100 times higher than in normal cells [22,27].

The study by Limpaiboon et al. (2005) examined the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MSI) at the hMLH1 locus and reported hypermethylation in 44.6% of the liver in Ov-CCA cases [15]. There had been a research gap in determining the status of O. viverrini infection and MMR proteins. A recent study identified a 22.5% prevalence of dMMR in Ov-CCA patients [28]. While the study found no statistically significant association between OV IgG status and dMMR protein expression, further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms linking dMMR with improved survival and response to therapy. MSI is also an epiphenomenon of dMMR [29], as MSI often results from dMMR. Hence, an in-depth analysis should be considered in Ov-CCA tumor types to recognise the beneficial impact of dMMR and MSI in enhancing treatment effectiveness and potential as targets for therapeutic interventions.

Trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop2)

The protein Trop2 is produced by the TACSTD2 (Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer) gene [30]. Hypermethylation of the TACSTD2 gene, which encodes Trop2, can silence its expression, contributing to its downregulation in some cancer types [31]. Trop2 affects cancer cell apoptosis by upregulating Bcl2 and downregulating the expression of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax [32]. The Bax/Bcl-2 expression ratio is a critical determinant in cellular response to apoptotic stimuli. An increased ratio reduces resistance to apoptosis, leading to heightened cell death and a decreased tumor incidence [33].

In O. viverrini infection, Bax levels increase at 14 dpi (days post-infection) and decrease at 90 dpi. These fluctuations are associated with the host immune response and the repercussions of recurrent tissue repairs resulting from parasitic infection [34]. The downregulation and internalisation of Bax are associated with metastasis and recurrence [35,36]. Furthermore, during O. viverrini infection, NF-κB, generally upregulated [37], and upregulated NF-κB, is known to decrease Bax expression in cancer cell lines [38]. This finding bolsters the evidence showing Trop2 distinct epigenetic silencing in Ov-CCA [16]. Reduced Trop2 expression, caused by hypermethylation, could shift the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, favouring a pro-apoptotic environment. Hence, Trop2, despite its usual overexpression in cancers, is epigenetically methylated and silenced in Ov-CCA, making it a unique prognostic marker for O. viverrini infection. It also opens up for the treatment enhancing Trop2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) effectiveness through demethylating agents and transcription factor modulation for low Trop2 expression cancers, offering a novel therapeutic strategy [39].

Retinoblastoma protein-interacting zinc-finger gene 1 (RIZ1)

The RIZ1 gene has been accurately located on chromosome 1q36, a region prone to genetic alterations like deletions, rearrangements, and LOH in many types of human cancers [4042]. Loss of RIZ1, a methyltransferase targeting lysine nine on histone H3, has been frequently observed in lung, breast, hepatocellular, colon, neuroblastoma, and melanoma, suggesting its potential role as a tumor suppressor in these malignancies [43].

In the case of Ov-CCA, Khaenam et al. (2010) showed that RIZ1 hypermethylation may play a potential role in cholangiocarcinogenesis, and the occurrence of RIZPro704 LOH is linked to poor patient survival in Ov-CCA [17]. RIZ1 hypermethylation may dysregulate ERα signalling and drive cancer progression [44, 45]. Compelling research evidence shows the correlation between reduced levels of RIZ1 and dysregulated ERα signalling in cancers [46,47]. Furthermore, higher levels of ER expression (specifically ERα) in cancer cells can lead to increased responsiveness to estrogen and potentially contribute to tumor progression [48,49]. In Ov-CCA, male patients exhibited markedly elevated serum estrogen levels compared to controls [50]. This suggests that the combined effects of opisthorchiasis and elevated estrogen levels may exhibit a complex impact on the tumor microenvironment, potentially promoting CCA development and progression.

Using siRNA to downregulate RIZ1 expression showed a correlation between diminished RIZ1 expression and heightened cell proliferation and migration in Ov-CCA [51]. The observed inverse epigenetic association with Ov-CCA differentiation underscores the potential of RIZ1 expression as a valuable indicator of its stage, aggressiveness, and differentiation.

EBF1 (Early B-cell Factor 1) in Ov-CCA

DNA hypermethylation within the EBF1 promoter region inhibits EBF1 expression and drives the progression of Ov-CCA, resulting in severe clinical outcomes [18]. EBF1 is a tumor suppressor in breast cancer [52], leukemia [53], and colorectal cancer [54] and inhibits gastric cancer progression by repressing the telomerase catalytic subunit [55].

Hypermethylation in the EBF1 promoter region correlates with reduced patient survival, repressing its expression and accelerating aggressive CCA advancement [56]. An inverse relationship between EBF1 expression and ZNF423 (Zinc Finger Protein 423) levels in tumor tissues leads to unfavourable prognostic outcomes [57]. In CCA, reduced ZNF423 leads to downregulated MMP9 expression and decreased EMT markers such as N-cadherin and vimentin [58]. Furthermore, ZNF423 is shown to have a complex relationship with EBF1 and can affect gene regulation in B-cell lymphopoiesis, including the downregulation of critical EBF1 targets and potential interference with TGF-β1 signalling [59].

The ability to manipulate EBF1 and ZNF423 levels can influence the disease’s course. The intricate relationship between these genes and their impact on the behaviour of the CCA cells strengthens the indication of their potential significance in both diagnosis and targeted treatment.

TP53 Mutations and ERBB2 Amplification in Ov-CCA

TP53 refers to the gene itself, while p53 denotes the protein produced by that gene. Specific missense p53 mutants actively alter the p53 interactome, influencing cellular pathways that promote cancer proliferation, migration, and metastasis [60]. Kiba et al. (1993) found p53 mutation in 35% of Thai CCA cases and suggested that p53 mutation is common in liver fluke related CCA [61]. In Ov-CCA tissues, immunohistochemistry analysis revealed an increase in p53 protein levels in 77% of the cases [62].

In a 2017 study, extensive DNA methylation analysis was conducted to investigate the link between multi-omics features and the aetiology of liver diseases [63]. Clusters 1 and 2, linked to liver fluke infection, exhibit common TP53 mutations and amplification of HER2 (ERBB2) in Ov-CCA. However, they diverge in CpG island hypermethylation, notably in cluster 1, underscoring the molecular heterogeneity of liver diseases with specific origins.

The HER2 receptor is a 185 kDa transmembrane protein encoded by the HER2, highlighting the importance of targeted therapies. A subset of Ov-CCA tissues display protein overexpression of HER2 [64] and exhibit ERBB2 gene amplification. Therefore, examining the impact of HER2 on various Ov-CCA subtypes could offer insights and raise the prospect that infected patients might gain advantages from rapidly evolving anti-HER2-directed therapies. These therapies emphasize personalised approaches, novel agents, and combinations to enhance efficacy while minimising side effects [65].

HOXD9 and OPCML in Epigenetic therapies and prognosis across cancer types

A study found that hypermethylation was enriched at homeobox and Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PCR2) target genes, including homeobox (HOXA9 and HOXD9) [66]. As HOXD9 deregulates histone methylation by PRC2 in cholangiocarcinogenesis, using histone methyltransferase inhibitors to block PCR2 and reactivate silenced HOX genes like HOXD9 could represent a potential epigenetic therapy approach for Ov-CCA. Therefore, understanding the specific methylation patterns and their consequences on HOX genes in Ov-CCA may provide a vital target for therapeutic interventions.

Opioid-binding protein/cell adhesion molecule-like gene (OPCML), an oncogenic suppressor, is frequently silenced by promoter hypermethylation [67]. In 2011, an initial report on OPCML methylation in Ov-CCA revealed a notably high frequency of 72.5%, while no methylation was detected in the adjacent normal tissues [8]. On the contrary, overexpression of OPCML can potentially suppress proliferation and induce apoptosis by deactivating the AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (AXL)/STAT3 signalling pathway in CCA [68]. This demonstrates a robust discriminatory capability of the gene, potentially effective in distinguishing Ov-CCA cancer cases from benign biliary conditions. Additionally, combining OPCML and HOXD9 methylation levels in cfDNA from serum samples provides a less invasive and more effective method for diagnosing and monitoring CCA [21].

Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1)

UCHL1, a member of the UCH class of deubiquitinases (DUBs), has highlighted the importance of promoter region hypermethylation as a mechanism for gene inactivation in cancer [69,70]. UCHL1 is upregulated in Ov-CCA tissue samples and may be linked to hypomethylation in the promoter region and potential induction of UCHL1 expression through cancer-induced DNA repair mechanisms. [20]. High levels of HTATIP2 methylation, also known as CC3 or TIP30, is a gene that encodes a protein involved in various cellular processes. Low levels of UCHL1 methylation were found with extended overall survival in Ov-CCA [20]. Similarly, in gallbladder and breast cancer, UCHL1 exhibits overexpression due to promoter hypomethylation and correlates with metastasis and reduced overall survival [7173]. These findings align with research linking UCHL1 overexpression to tumor progression, increased size, and invasiveness [74]. Therefore, understanding the molecular alterations associated with UCHL1 hypomethylation-induced upregulation, targeted therapies can be developed to modulate UCHL1 expression, offering a potential avenue for therapeutic intervention in Ov-CCA.

Loss of Tumor Suppressors p14ARF, p15INK4b, p16INK4a

Separate genes encode p14ARF (p14 Alternate Reading Frame), p15INK4b (p15 Inhibitor of Kinase 4B), and p16INK4a (p16 Inhibitor of Kinase 4A), yet are closely related and functionally connected. CDKN2A encodes p16INK4A and p14ARF, CDKN2B encodes p15INK4B [75]. CDKN2A and CDKN2B have been associated with poorer prognosis in meningioma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lung adenocarcinoma [7678].

Liver fluke CCA cases exhibited notable elevated occurrences of promoter hypermethylation in the p14 (40.2%), p15 (48.9%), and p16 (28.3%) genes [19]. In Ov-CCA, it is characterised by frequent LOH at the chromosomal region 9p21-other, which affects these key tumor suppressor genes p14ARF, p15INK4b, and p16INK4a [19]. The presence of senescence markers like p14ARF allows the elimination of aberrant aneuploid cells through apoptosis [79]. Still, in Ov-CCA, p14ARF is often lost, which may diminish the apoptotic response, allowing the uncontrolled proliferation of abnormal cells and potentially facilitating cancer progression [80].

The methylation of the p16INK4a promoter primarily arises from DNA damage resulting from interference between transcription and replication processes [81]. Therefore, the CDKN2A/B methylation and expression changes show promise as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets related to DNA damage and repair mechanisms in Ov-CCA.

Potential Roles of Hypermethylated DCR1, HIC1, SFRP1 and PTEN in Ov-CCA Development

High-frequency methylation of CpG island promoters is a prominent mechanism in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) [82], influencing various cancer types and contributing to tumor initiation and progression through genome-wide and gene-specific DNA methylation alterations [83]. In Ov-CCA, promoter hypermethylation in several CpG islands genes, such as (DcR1, SFRP1, PTEN, H1C1, and DcR1) exhibited a methylation frequency exceeding 28% compared to adjacent normal tissue [8].

Decoy receptor (DcRs) often downregulated through promoter hypermethylation in cancer, overexpression reduces sensitivity to TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) -induced apoptosis and DNA-damaging agents. At the same time, its silencing enhances chemotherapeutic agent-induced apoptosis, indicating its significant role in chemosensitivity regulation [84,85]. In Ov-CCA, patients exhibiting methylation at the DcR1 locus displayed a greater survival rate than those without methylation [8,86], indicating the potential use of recombinant TRAIL and TRAIL receptor agonists for Ov-CCA treatment. This observation may also be attributed to the role of DcR1 as a decoy, impeding TRAIL binding to death receptors and suppressing the apoptotic process, as observed in tongue carcinoma [87].

The methylation of the promoter region of the secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1) holds potential as a diagnostic indicator and therapeutic target, particularly in specific malignancies like ampullary adenocarcinoma and gastric cancer, where its upregulation is linked to poor prognoses [88,89]. In a survey study involving 73 patients diagnosed with primary Ov-CCA, the median methylation levels for SFRP1 were 31.5% [90]. The analysis indicated that SFRP1 exhibited a sensitivity of 83.56%, a specificity of 100%, and an overall accuracy of 85.54%. As a secreted protein, detecting SFRP1 methylation in blood or other biofluids could enable non-invasive screening and monitoring of Ov-CCA.

The tumor suppressor PTEN loss is common in many cancers, including CCA [91]. PTEN loss in the Ov-CCA hamster model shows extensive alterations in DNA methylation and gene expression, ultimately activating the PI3K/AKT/PTEN and Wnt/β-catenin pathways, pivotal in governing cellular growth, proliferation, survival, and metabolism [92]. PTEN helps counteract the activity of PI3K, which is often hyperactivated in opisthorchiasis-induced CCA and promotes cell survival, proliferation, and growth [93]. Hence, hyperactivation of this pathway due to PTEN inactivation may enhance cancer progression during opisthorchiasis.

HIC1 (Hypermethylated in Cancer 1), a tumor suppresser gene, triggered G2/M cell cycle arrest in a glioblastoma cell line model, potentially through induction of full-length p53 and its downstream cell cycle regulators p21 and p27 [94]. In contrast, the truncated p53 isoform Δ133p53 was associated with 5-fluorouracil chemoresistance in Ov-CCA models, and its inhibition restored drug sensitivity CCA [95]. Given HIC1’s role as a transcriptional repressor that interacts with p53, these findings suggest epigenetic silencing of HIC1 may promote chemoresistance in Ov-CCA by altering p53 regulation and cell cycle control. Therefore, targeting the HIC1-p53 axis therapeutically, through approaches like demethylating agents or Δ133p53 inhibitors, may help enhance response to chemotherapy in Ov-CCA patients.

Histone Modification as a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Ov-CCA

The “writer” of H3K27me3, Enhancer of zest homolog 2 (EZH2), has been known to be involved in tumor progression and is the catalytic subunit of Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which is a highly conserved histone methyltransferase that targets lysine-27 of histone H3 [96,97]. Mice exhibiting liver specific EZH2 knockout demonstrated reduced CCA development, while also, in a xenograft model, EZH2 knockdown markedly slowed the progression of CCA [98]. Similarly, in Ov-CCA tissue samples, high EZH2 expression is associated with poorer survival, and combined high EZH2, SUZ12, and EED correlated with a worse prognosis [99].

The unique upregulation of H3K27me3 by the PRC2 complex in Ov-CCA, notably involving EZH2 and SUZ12 compared to other cancers, signifies a specific epigenetic mechanism contributing to its aggressiveness, potentially making histone-modifying enzymes like EZH2 viable targets for treatment and prognosis evaluation [99]. Dysregulation of the PRC2–H3K27me3 axis is linked to different diseases, including several cancers [96,100] and inflammatory processes [101]. Therefore, SUZ12 and EED are other essential components of the PRC2 complex. SUZ12 stabilises PRC2 and is necessary for its methyltransferase activity [102], and EED interacts with EZH2 and helps guide PRC2 [103] to its target sites on chromatin [104]. Recently, compounds that disrupt the interaction between EZH2 and EED have been developed, leading to the destabilisation and degradation of PRC2 proteins, which could provide a new avenue for cancer therapy [104,105]. These compounds represent a range of strategies for targeting components of the PRC2 complex, offering potential therapeutic avenues for various cancers, including CCA and Ov-CCA.

In summary, both DNA methylation and histone epigenetic alterations appear as crucial events in Ov-CCA (Fig 2). However, it’s important to note that regulating the genes and proteins is complex and context-dependent. The specific pathways and mechanisms involved in their upregulation or downregulation may vary in different cell types and under other conditions. Understanding these regulatory mechanisms is essential for developing targeted therapies and diagnostic approaches for diseases involving their dysregulation.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Genes and Proteins involved in epigenetic regulation of Ov-CCA (Created with BioRender.com).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012477.g002

3.2.2 Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of Epigenes in Ov-CCA.

The genes identified in this review, implicated in Ov-CCA pathology, underwent Enrichment analysis using Enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/) against the Wiki Pathway Collection library [106], an open-access platform supported by a collaborative scientific community. In total 23 genes (hMLH1, RIZ1, Trop2, ERBB2, EBF1, OPCML, HOXA9, HOXD9, HTATIP2, UCHL1, p14ARF, p15INK4b, p16INK4a, EZH2, SUZ12, H3K27, PTEN, H1C1, PRC2, DKK1, DCR1, HIC1, SFRP1) identified in Ov-CCA epigenetic alterations were subjected to gene set enrichment analysis (Fig 3A). The top five predicted pathways based on highest combined score were selected and shown in a bar chart (Fig 3B).

thumbnail
Fig 3.

(A) Ov-CCA-associated genes (B) Top five predicted pathways for genes involved in Ov-CCA. This analysis revealed pathways exhibiting the greatest overlap with the queried gene set. Notably, Wnt signalling appeared twice in the chart with the highest combined score. A higher combined score indicated lower p-values (greater statistical significance) and increased gene overlap, reinforcing the enrichment confidence. These research findings also merit researchers investigating genes and pathways in pleural mesothelioma.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012477.g003

3.2.3 Identifying Hub Genes and Pathway Dysregulation in Ov-CCA.

To be more species specific, the STRING database [107] was used to predict protein-protein interactions involving these genes (Fig 3A), which includes both physical interactions and functional associations. These genes were analyzed with the most deregulated pathways related to Ov-CCA. These pathways were compiled from literature reviews and underwent manual screening of titles and abstracts, using specific keywords. The most deregulated pathways based on Ov-CCA studies were PI3K (Phosphoinositide 3-kinase), AKT (protein kinase B), mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog), CTNNB1 (Catenin Beta-1), NAKB1 (Nuclear Factor Kappa B Subunit 1), MAPK (Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase), and RTK (Receptor Tyrosine Kinase).

In the STRING database, hub genes exhibit extensive connectivity within a network, underscoring their pivotal role and significant impact on biological processes through interactions with multiple partners. β-catenin (CTNNB1) demonstrated elevated centrality values relative to other ranked genes in the network, suggesting its potential as a target for pathway-specific therapies or drug interventions in Ov-CCA (Fig 4B). CTNNB1 showed the highest score at 47670 (Fig 4C). A higher score suggests the gene likely acts as a central hub in biological networks, facilitating interactions across various pathways and processes.

thumbnail
Fig 4.

(A) STRING interaction of genes and pathways involved in Ov-CCA. (B)Top 7 genes showed in Hierichial layout. (C) Ranked gene names and string interaction scores.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012477.g004

3.2.4 Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway emerges as a common signalling pathway in Ov-CCA.

The Wnt pathway utilises canonical (Wnt/β-catenin) and noncanonical (Wnt/Ca2+ and planar cell polarity) routes. The canonical pathway involves β-catenin activation of genes through TCF/LEF. and noncanonical pathways regulate cell polarity and migration independently of β-catenin-TCF/LEF, forming a distinct network from the canonical pathway’s control over cell proliferation. [108].

Wnt ligands play a pivotal role by interacting with cell membrane-bound receptors and co-receptors, influencing critical physiological and pathophysiological functions across various organs and cell types. These functions include organ development, cancer formation, and fibrosis [109]. In molecular oncology research, comprehending the underlying mechanisms of the anti-tumor effects and pathways involved in overall CCA progression is pivotal for tailoring targeted therapies, ensuring treatment efficacy, and reducing adverse effects [110,111]. Our analysis showed that Wnt/β signalling predominantly emerges in Ov-CCA (Table 2).

Most of the discussed genes/proteins appear to function by suppressing Wnt/β-catenin signalling in Ov-CCA. In Ov-CCA research, although hMLH1 isn’t directly linked to the Wnt signalling pathway, the hypermethylation of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene MLH1’s promoter and microsatellite instability (MSI)-related tumors have been correlated with WNT signalling activation, likely through frameshift insertion/deletion mutations [112]. This activation can result in reduced tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy [113,114], suggesting a less favourable environment for the immune system to mount an effective anti-cancer response. The loss of hMLH1 in Ov-CCA is mainly associated with DNA repair [115], and deviant methylation patterns within DNA damage repair genes hold the potential to function as predictive, prognostic, and chemosensitive markers in the context of human cancer [116].

In human tissue samples of Ov-CCA, RIZ1 gene methylation and epigenetic alteration were associated with poorer survival [17,51]. RIZ1 suppresses Wnt signalling via β-catenin in breast cancer and parathyroid tumors [117,118], implying a conserved negative regulatory role of RIZ1 in the β-catenin pathway across these malignancies. Therefore, targeting Wnt signalling and restoring RIZ1 function shows potential in overall CCA treatment. However, contextual factors like age, gender, and organ may influence RIZ1’s function, as in estrogen-related cancer, as it exhibits a dual role, acting as both a promoter and inhibitor of tumor growth, highlighting its complex and context-dependent nature [119].

In Ov-CCA, Trop2 is frequently hypermethylated, causing growth and metastatic advantages to the biliary cancer cells [16], which sets them apart from other cancer types. Trop2 co-localizes with β-catenin in the nucleus, upregulating cyclin D1 and c-myc, fostering nuclear oncogene transcription and cell proliferation [120]. The Wnt-β-catenin signalling pathway can modulate the activation of β-catenin, a pivotal element in Wnt signalling, thereby indirectly influencing the Wnt signalling cascade [121]. Therefore, the unique hypermethylation of Trop2 in Ov-CCA cells implies that it does not play its usual role in interacting with the Wnt/β-catenin pathway to affect cancer progression but rather a suppressive effect fostering tumorigenesis in O. viverrini infection.

EBF1 is frequently hypermethylated and silenced epigenetically in its promoter region in Ov-CCA tissues [18]. EBF1 is linked to regulating genes associated with the immune response and cytokine production, including IL-6 [122]. Furthermore, the IL-6/STAT3 signalling pathway is implicated in the hypermethylation of the EBF1 promoter, demonstrating that IL-6 potentially plays a role in this epigenetic modification [123]. IL-6 also can interact with Wnt signalling pathways, aiding in repair and regeneration [124]. Both IL-1β and IL-6 are widely produced in O. viverrini infection [125,126], and these interleukins have significantly reduced Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) production using Wnt signalling pathway, potentially causing an abnormal Wnt pathway [127]. Additionally, in bioinformatics analyses of gene expression data sets in intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA) cholangiocarcinomas, DKK1 was identified alongside MMP7 as a distinguishing marker between these cancer types [128].

Aberrant Wnt activation drives abnormal cell growth and neoplastic transformation, while concurrent CDKN2A/B deficiency synergistically promotes tumorigenesis via Wnt signalling pathway activation [129]. This combined effect substantially increases the risk of cancer, highlighting the pivotal roles of both elements in suppressing tumors. In Ov-CCA, aberrant p14ARF methylation, resulting from DNA damage, reduces its expression, impacting genomic stability. CDKN2A and TP53 are crucial, with p14ARF from CDKN2A enhancing p53’s tumor-suppressing functions [130]. Additionally, the loss of the CDKN2A/B locus, which encodes essential cell cycle inhibitors like p16INK4A and p15INK4B, is common in Ov-CCA. This loss may cause the co-deletion of the tumor suppressor gene methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), resulting in uncontrolled cell proliferation [131], as MTAP is located on the 9p21 chromosome, where CDKN2A/B is also located.CDKN2A/B and MTAP loss, p16INK4A methylation, senescence marker downregulation, and p53 alteration reflect fundamental genomic and epigenetic changes in Ov-CCA pathogenesis.

EZH2 silences Wnt pathway antagonists, activating Wnt/β-catenin signalling in hepatocellular carcinomas, contributing to their proliferation and suggesting a potential therapeutic target [132]. EZH2 transactivates genes commonly targeted by estrogen and Wnt signalling pathways [133]. In the context of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), the inhibition of EZH2 has been demonstrated to suppress Wnt/β-catenin signalling, thereby contributing to its oncogenic role, with targeting EZH2 resulting in reduced β-catenin activity and consequential effects on proliferation and invasion [134]. However, in the context of Ov-CCA, EZH2 is overexpressed, potentially disrupting balanced Wnt/β-catenin signalling and resulting in heightened β-catenin downstream signalling. Similarly, in cervical cancer, the overexpression of EZH2 promotes tumor progression by enhancing cell proliferation and tumor formation through activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, achieved via epigenetic silencing of GSK-3β and TP53 [135]. In chemoresistant Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) cells, both the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and EZH2 are upregulated, indicating a relationship between higher EZH2 expression and Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation, contributing to chemoresistance and cancer stem cell accumulation [136].

SFRP1, in O. viverrini infection, is known to serve as a Wnt inhibitor and is overexpressed in EZH2-deficient tissues [137]. Wnt proteins initiate intracellular signalling pathways by binding to frizzled (FZ) receptors and coreceptors, thus revealing their cellular effects [138], and notably, in the case of Ov-CCA, it has been observed that SFRP1 is downregulated from hypermethylation, supporting the finding of EZH2 overexpression leading to decreased SFRP1. The upregulation of EZH2 and downregulation of SFRP1 in the context of O. viverrini infection may play a crucial role in aberrant expression of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and it may also be associated with the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling and the consequential proliferation of CCA cells. Regulating this mechanism can potentially control cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in opisthorchiasis while maintaining an effective immune response that supports the survival of the host-parasite relationship. These findings underscore the epigenetic significance of SFRP1 and EZH2 unique to Ov-CCA and suggest potential avenues for therapeutic intervention.

In Ov-CCA, the highest methylation frequency of OPCML was observed (72.5%), indicating its potential use as an epigenetic biomarker for CCA prognosis and diagnosis. In the context of esophageal cancer, OPCML’s downregulation in Grade 3 tumors may implicate its regulatory role in the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, potentially contributing to the development and progression of higher-grade tumors [139]. This relationship remains unexplored in Ov-CCA tissue samples and cases. OPCML, also a stress- and p53-responsive gene, when hypermethylated, diminishes the response; introducing OPCML in carcinoma cells lacking it results in substantial growth inhibition, highlighting its potential as a tumor suppressor [140]. A Mutant p53 (mutp53) protein can interact with components of the Wnt pathway, such as β-catenin, to enhance their activity.

Generally, TP53 mutations activate the Wnt pathway via mutp53 interaction [141], fostering poorly differentiated and invasive tumors in cancer. Without TP53’s normal tumor suppressor function, mutp53 can influence other pathways, including Wnt, that drive cancer progression [142]. Missense TP53 mutations directly affect the Wnt pathway, and in O. viverrini infection, exon 6 TP53 mutations may contribute to cholangiocarcinogenesis [143]. Hence, elevating components of the Wnt pathway through the attenuation of p53 signalling has been demonstrated to be a critical factor in promoting the formation of metastases [144]. Crosstalk between the p53 and Wnt pathways involves direct interactions, where p53 can regulate the stability and subcellular location of β-catenin. Additionally, these pathways affect each other’s protein stability and gene expression, influencing essential cancer-related genes [142].

Cancer research actively investigates potential treatment drugs to modulate the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, a key player in cancer progression. These drugs can either inhibit or activate Wnt signalling, depending on the specific disease type, stage, and lesion characteristics, as highlighted by recent studies [145,146]. Further exploration is needed to determine whether targeting epigenetically activated genes and proteins could potentially suppress Ov-CCA tumors by regulating the Wnt pathway and whether the epigenetic status of these genes and proteins could serve as a useful biomarker in this context.

4. Wnt/β-catenin as a therapeutic target for Ov-CCA

Extensive research has uncovered genetic alterations in cancer-related signalling pathways, leading to the development of targeted therapies [147]. Using String-DB [148], network analysis revealed a notable interaction pattern among the 23 dysregulated epigenes, notably with β-catenin and Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) ranking second highest in the analysis (Fig 4).

Wnt/β-catenin signalling, known for directly or indirectly suppressing various Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor proteins (CKIs, or CDKNs). For example, p16, encoded by p16INK4A (CDKN2A), is an inhibitor of CDK4, and the expressions of cyclin D1 and CDK4 are up-regulated in opisthorchiasis-associated CCA [149]. There is a possibility that the expression of β-catenin may prevent senescence by suppressing p16INK4A expression [150]. Therefore, the downregulation of p16INK4A may allow cancer cells to bypass senescence and continue proliferating, contributing to tumor progression. Furthermore, the Wnt target, MYC, inhibits the transcription of several other CKIs, including CDKN1A (p21), CDKN1B (p27), and CDKN2B (p15) [151], all of which demonstrate hypermethylation Ov-CCA and CCA.

Various strategies to inhibit this pathway are being explored in preclinical and clinical studies, including blocking porcupine enzymes, silencing DKK1, targeting microRNAs, and regulating the PI3K/AKT/PTEN/GSK-3β, retinoic acid receptor (RAR), protein kinase A regulatory subunit 1 alpha (PRKAR1A/PKAI), liver kinase B1 (LKB1) and CXCR4 axes that modulate β-catenin activity and its downstream target genes [152,153]. Therefore, investigating whether the dysregulation mentioned above is a shared feature among different causative agents of Ov-CCA would provide valuable insights for the potential use of Wnt/β-catenin targeted therapies in the overall management of CCA.

Dickkopf-1 (DKK1), a soluble antagonist of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, is elevated in the serum of patients with various cancers and animal models of chronic inflammatory diseases [154]. The bidirectional relationships between DKK1 and inflammation, influenced by systemic inflammatory signals and local tumor inflammation, highlight its intricate involvement in disease pathways [155]. Considering its association with immunosuppressive phenotypes in iCCA [156], DKK1 emerges as a potential therapeutic target for iCCA [157]. In O. viverrini infection, IL-6 and IL-1β are upregulated [158], and both of these interleukins may significantly dampen Wnt antagonist Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) [127,159]. The activation of Wnt signalling via downregulation of DKK1 may impact downstream pathways, such as NF-κB, which govern inflammatory responses [160] during O. viverrini infection. Therefore, exploring DKK1’s role in Ov-CCA and its impact on NF-κB and Wnt/β-catenin crosstalk is crucial for identifying potential anti-cancer therapy targets.

The suppression of PRKAR1A expression resulted in growth inhibition and apoptosis of Ov-CCA, while its overexpression was correlated with elevated levels of ECPKA autoantibodies [161]. ECPKA shows potential as a cancer biomarker, with the prospect of being utilised to differentiate between malignant tumors and benign conditions [162]. Furthermore, silencing PRKAR1A reduces multiple signalling pathways and can affect various intracellular signalling pathways, including MAPKs, PI3K/Akt, JAK/STAT, and Wnt/β-catenin, influencing CCA cell behaviour and growth [163]. These discoveries highlight the potential of targeting the PKA pathway to regulate Wnt/β-catenin in Ov-CCA therapy, alone or in combination with other anticancer drugs.

CXCR4, a chemokine receptor, is involved in downstream signalling triggered by the interaction of CD63 with N-glycans found on tetraspanin (TSPs) released by O. viverrini [164]. Elevated CXCR4 expression has been linked to iCCA progression and metastases [165], and CXCR4 knockdown has been correlated with the suppression of Wnt target genes and the inhibition of malignant biliary tract tumor progression [165,166]. A better understanding of how O. viverrini infection influences CXCR4 expression and associated signalling cascades may provide key insights into and strategies to suppress CXCR4-driven Wnt activation and disease progression in Ov-CCA patients.

Extensive research has uncovered genetic alterations in cancer-related signalling pathways, leading to the development of targeted therapies [147]. Dysfunctional Wnt/β-catenin signalling is a crucial pathway in numerous cancers and diseases, impacting cell proliferation, invasion, and stemness and leading to enduring epigenetic alterations in gene expression [108,167]. Our review study identified all epigenetic-based studies on opisthorchiasis-induced CCA, the types of epigenetic modifications involved, and their potential as biomarkers and therapeutic applications (Table 2). Through this analysis, we observed that the Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction pathway is frequently dysregulated in Ov-CCA, primarily due to promoter methylation. Given that the Wnt/β-catenin pathway has emerged as a central player in CCA, its alteration is associated with worse outcomes in specific CCA subtypes [152]. Hence, exploring the complex Wnt signalling pathway offers promising and innovative therapeutic opportunities for treating Ov-CCA, as well as non-Ov-CCA. Although clinical trials testing Wnt pathway inhibitors have been undertaken, they have not yet received approval. The primary obstacle lies in the remarkable evolutionary conservation of the canonical WNT/β-catenin signalling pathway, a pivotal regulator of tissue development and homeostasis [168]. Nevertheless, some trials combining Wnt inhibition with chemotherapeutic drugs have shown promise [169].

5. Discussion and conclusion

In the post-genomic era, the epigenetic foundation of cancer development has brought about a significant transformation in cancer genetics. This breakthrough has introduced new avenues for therapeutic interventions in cancer treatment [170]. This scoping review investigates the genes associated with epigenetic changes in the progression of liver fluke-induced cancer, examining their interplay with Wnt- β-catenin signalling in Ov-CCA. The study provides valuable insights into potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets related to epigenetic studies in O. viverrini infection. The Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway offers a promising target for opisthorchiasis-induced cancer therapy, given its central role in cancer progression and its potential as a focus for inhibitors. The analysis also elucidates strategies leveraging epigenetic markers for therapeutic interventions. While its involvement in carcinogenesis is well-characterized, aberrant Wnt signalling is also observed in various other cancer types.

Wnt/β-catenin signalling is central to cancer research for its key role in cancer development and progression. In this paper, we systematically examined studies investigating the epigenetic mechanisms underlying Ov-CCA (Fig 5). All clinical samples in our study were obtained from patients diagnosed with Ov-CCA and were analyzed across selected studies. The predominant epigenetic alterations involved DNA hypermethylation of promoter CpG islands, notably impacting the expression of tumor suppressor genes. Numerous genes displayed hypermethylation in Ov-CCA tissues compared to normal tissues, including hMLH1, RIZ1, Trop2, EBF1, p14ARF, p15INK4b, p16INK4a, OPCML, PTEN, and SFRP1. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed the Wnt/β-catenin pathway as the most significantly enriched pathway associated with these differentially methylated genes. Moreover, network analysis identified β-catenin as a central hub gene interacting with multiple epigenetically altered genes. Collectively, these findings suggest dysfunctional Wnt/β-catenin signalling as a common pathological mechanism in Ov-CCA, primarily driven by aberrant promoter hypermethylation. Since the Wnt pathway regulates critical processes like proliferation, pathogenesis, invasion, and stemness, targeting this pathway may offer therapeutic benefits for Ov-CCA. However, medications targeting Wnt/β-catenin signalling in cancers are either not yet in clinical trials or are in early-phase trials with unsatisfactory outcomes [171]. In conclusion, this scoping review enhances understanding of the epigenetic landscape in Ov-CCA and provides insights towards developing novel targeted and precision therapies for this disease.

thumbnail
Fig 5. This review is the first to scope, collate, and catalogue research investigating epigenetic markers for diagnosis and therapeutic potential in Ov-CCA.

It identifies several potentially valuable epigenetic markers and potential drug targets, encouraging further exploration. Additionally, it sheds light on shared signalling pathways that could help design future studies focused on epigenetics in this field. The findings of this research present promising avenues for developing epigenetic-based therapeutic strategies and differential biomarkers in the treatment of Ov-CCA. (Created with BioRender.com).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012477.g005

In recent years, there has been an increase in the incidence of CCA, yet its prognosis remains challenging [172]. This is primarily due to its limited surgical resection success rate and its resistance to traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy methods, which pose significant challenges for effective treatment [173]. Unlike genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations are reversible and dynamically influenced by the tumour microenvironment, making them attractive candidates for minimally invasive testing and disease progression tracking. Hence, understanding the underlying mechanisms driving CCA pathogenesis induced during O. viverrini infection, the factors governing its growth, signalling pathways, and leveraging epigenetics offer a promising avenue for personalised, targeted therapies and enhanced diagnostic and prognostic capacities in disease management. Ultimately, this study intends to offer guidance for future research by identifying key considerations and insights essential for developing more targeted therapies for Wnt/β-catenin signalling in cancer.

6. Limitations

Extensive research has elucidated that canonical and non-canonical Wnt signalling impacts cancer by interacting with the microenvironment and immune system, with non-canonical signalling regulating cell motility in both development and metastasis, while their balance varies across different tissues and tumours [174]. Moreover, variability in laboratory procedures across different studies could have contributed to variations in test results, and it’s important to note that the analysis was primarily performed on samples from the primary tumour, potentially introducing intra-tumour heterogeneity, as the papers did not specify whether patients were being treated for their metastases. Furthermore, this review did not examine small non-coding RNAs like microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). These can serve as multifactorial epigenetic gene regulators by modifying transcription and post-transcriptional regulation and signalling pathways. The absence of research addressing these aspects in Ov-CCA and epigenetic markers is a notable limitation within both the scope of Ov-CCA studies and this specific scoping review. Further future research should focus on distinguishing Ov-CCA-specific methylation changes from those influenced by non-Ov-CCA factors using comprehensive techniques like methylated DNA immunoprecipitation microarray (MeDIP-chip) genome-wide analysis. This can help identify definitive diagnostic epigenetic markers for CCA and advance our understanding of this disease. The absence of precise numerical data while studying epigenetic alteration reported in O. viverrini lacks in-depth statistical analysis, including sensitivity, specificity, AUC, OR, RR, and survival rates, within the included study text precludes a comprehensive assessment of the biomarker efficacy of epigenetic markers or their therapeutic prospects.

Supporting information

S1 Table. The PCC (Population/Concept/Context) framework employed to structure key concepts, focusing on the crucial involvement of DNA methylation and histone modifications in Ov-CCA pathogenesis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012477.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. The core methodologies frequently applied in Ov-CCA methylation studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012477.s002

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Saijuntha W, Sithithaworn P, Petney TN, Andrews RH. Foodborne zoonotic parasites of the family Opisthorchiidae. Research in Veterinary Science. 2021;135:404–11. pmid:33158552
  2. 2. Sripa B, Kaewkes S, Sithithaworn P, Mairiang E, Laha T, Smout M, et al. Liver fluke induces cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS Med. 2007;4(7):e201. pmid:17622191
  3. 3. Cancer IAfRo. Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori: IARC Lyon; 1994.
  4. 4. Sithithaworn P, Andrews RH, Nguyen VD, Wongsaroj T, Sinuon M, Odermatt P, et al. The current status of opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis in the Mekong Basin. Parasitol Int. 2012;61(1):10–6. pmid:21893213
  5. 5. Sripa B, Pairojkul C. Cholangiocarcinoma: lessons from Thailand. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2008;24(3):349. pmid:18408464
  6. 6. Mairiang E, Haswell-Elkins MR, Mairiang P, Sithithaworn P, Elkins DB. Reversal of biliary tract abnormalities associated with Opisthorchis viverrini infection following praziquantel treatment. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1993;87(2):194–7. pmid:8337727
  7. 7. Jusakul A, Kongpetch S, Teh BT. Genetics of Opisthorchis viverrini-related cholangiocarcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31(3):258–63. pmid:25693006
  8. 8. Sriraksa R, Zeller C, El-Bahrawy MA, Dai W, Daduang J, Jearanaikoon P, et al. CpG-island methylation study of liver fluke-related cholangiocarcinoma. British Journal of Cancer. 2011;104(8):1313–8. pmid:21448164
  9. 9. Chan-On W, Nairismägi ML, Ong CK, Lim WK, Dima S, Pairojkul C, et al. Exome sequencing identifies distinct mutational patterns in liver fluke-related and non-infection-related bile duct cancers. Nat Genet. 2013;45(12):1474–8. pmid:24185513
  10. 10. Limpaiboon T. Epigenetic aberrations in cholangiocarcinoma: potential biomarkers and promising target for novel therapeutic strategies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(Suppl):41–5. pmid:23480763
  11. 11. Zhang H, Yang T, Wu M, Shen F. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and surgical management. Cancer Lett. 2016;379(2):198–205. pmid:26409434
  12. 12. Neganova ME, Klochkov SG, Aleksandrova YR, Aliev G. Histone modifications in epigenetic regulation of cancer: Perspectives and achieved progress. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2022;83:452–71. pmid:32814115
  13. 13. Li Y, Fan Z, Meng Y, Liu S, Zhan H. Blood-based DNA methylation signatures in cancer: A systematic review. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Basis of Disease. 2023;1869(1):166583. pmid:36270476
  14. 14. Lianidou E. Detection and relevance of epigenetic markers on ctDNA: recent advances and future outlook. Mol Oncol. 2021;15(6):1683–700. pmid:33942482
  15. 15. Limpaiboon T, Khaenam P, Chinnasri P, Soonklang M, Jearanaikoon P, Sripa B, et al. Promoter hypermethylation is a major event of hMLH1 gene inactivation in liver fluke related cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2005;217(2):213–9. pmid:15617839
  16. 16. Sawanyawisuth K, Tantapotinan N, Wongkham C, Riggins GJ, Kraiklang R, Wongkham S, et al. Suppression of trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 enhances proliferation and migration in liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Hepatol. 2016;15(1):71–81. pmid:26626643
  17. 17. Khaenam P, Jearanaikoon P, Pairojkul C, Bhudhisawasdi V, Limpaiboon T. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of RIZ1 and the correlation to clinicopathological parameters in liver fluke-related cholangiocarcinoma. Exp Ther Med. 2010;1(2):385–90. pmid:22993552
  18. 18. Armartmuntree N, Jusakul A, Sakonsinsiri C, Loilome W, Pinlaor S, Ungarreevittaya P, et al. Promoter hypermethylation of early B cell factor 1 (EBF1) is associated with cholangiocarcinoma progression. J Cancer. 2021;12(9):2673–86. pmid:33854627
  19. 19. Chinnasri P, Pairojkul C, Jearanaikoon P, Sripa B, Bhudhisawasdi V, Tantimavanich S, et al. Preferentially different mechanisms of inactivation of 9p21 gene cluster in liver fluke-related cholangiocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2009;40(6):817–26. pmid:19200577
  20. 20. Nanok C, Jearanaikoon P, Proungvitaya S, Limpaiboon T. Aberrant methylation of HTATIP2 and UCHL1 as a predictive biomarker for cholangiocarcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(3):4145–53. pmid:29359783
  21. 21. Wasenang W, Chaiyarit P, Proungvitaya S, Limpaiboon T. Serum cell-free DNA methylation of OPCML and HOXD9 as a biomarker that may aid in differential diagnosis between cholangiocarcinoma and other biliary diseases. Clinical Epigenetics. 2019;11(1):39. pmid:30832707
  22. 22. Pećina-Šlaus N, Kafka A, Salamon I, Bukovac A. Mismatch Repair Pathway, Genome Stability and Cancer. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:122. pmid:32671096
  23. 23. Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, Sidransky D, Eshleman JR, Burt RW, et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58(22):5248–57. pmid:9823339
  24. 24. Deng G, Peng E, Gum J, Terdiman J, Sleisenger M, Kim YS. Methylation of hMLH1 promoter correlates with the gene silencing with a region-specific manner in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002;86(4):574–9. pmid:11870540
  25. 25. Levine AJ, Phipps AI, Baron JA, Buchanan DD, Ahnen DJ, Cohen SA, et al. Clinicopathologic Risk Factor Distributions for MLH1 Promoter Region Methylation in CIMP-Positive Tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(1):68–75. pmid:26512054
  26. 26. Kim JH, Rhee YY, Bae JM, Kwon HJ, Cho NY, Kim MJ, et al. Subsets of microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancers exhibit discordance between the CpG island methylator phenotype and MLH1 methylation status. Mod Pathol. 2013;26(7):1013–22. pmid:23370766
  27. 27. Thomas DC, Umar A, Kunkel TA. Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair defects in cancer. Mutat Res. 1996;350(1):201–5. pmid:8657182
  28. 28. Khuntikeo N, Padthaisong S, Loilome W, Klanrit P, Ratchatapusit S, Techasen A, et al. Mismatch Repair Deficiency Is a Prognostic Factor Predicting Good Survival of Opisthorchis viverrini-Associated Cholangiocarcinoma at Early Cancer Stage. 2023;15(19):4831.
  29. 29. Parente P, Grillo F, Vanoli A, Macciomei MC, Ambrosio MR, Scibetta N, et al. The Day-To-Day Practice of MMR and MSI Assessment in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: What We Know and What We Still Need to Explore. Dig Dis. 2023;41(5):746–56. pmid:37231848
  30. 30. Lipinski M, Parks DR, Rouse RV, Herzenberg LA. Human trophoblast cell-surface antigens defined by monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(8):5147–50. pmid:7029529
  31. 31. Shvartsur A, Bonavida B. Trop2 and its overexpression in cancers: regulation and clinical/therapeutic implications. Genes & cancer. 2015;6(3–4):84–105. pmid:26000093
  32. 32. Liu X, Deng J, Yuan Y, Chen W, Sun W, Wang Y, et al. Advances in Trop2-targeted therapy: Novel agents and opportunities beyond breast cancer. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2022;239:108296. pmid:36208791
  33. 33. Vaskivuo TE, Stenbäck F, Tapanainen JS. Apoptosis and apoptosis-related factors Bcl-2, Bax, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and NF-kappaB in human endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95(7):1463–71. pmid:12237915
  34. 34. Boonmars T, Srisawangwong T, Srirach P, Kaewsamut B, Pinlaor S, Sithithaworn P. Apoptosis-related gene expressions in hamsters re-infected with Opisthorchis viverrini and re-treated with praziquantel. Parasitology research. 2007;102(1):57–62. pmid:17851691
  35. 35. Wang X, Lin Y, Lan F, Yu Y, Ouyang X, Liu W, et al. BAX and CDKN1A polymorphisms correlated with clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with postoperative chemotherapy. Medical Oncology. 2014;31:1–10. pmid:25267570
  36. 36. Liu Z, Ding Y, Ye N, Wild C, Chen H, Zhou J. Direct Activation of Bax Protein for Cancer Therapy. Med Res Rev. 2016;36(2):313–41. pmid:26395559
  37. 37. Seubwai W, Wongkham C, Puapairoj A, Khuntikeo N, Pugkhem A, Hahnvajanawong C, et al. Aberrant expression of NF-κB in liver fluke associated cholangiocarcinoma: implications for targeted therapy. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e106056.
  38. 38. Bentires-Alj M, Dejardin E, Viatour P, Van Lint C, Froesch B, Reed JC, et al. Inhibition of the NF-κB transcription factor increases Bax expression in cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 2001;20(22):2805–13.
  39. 39. Zhao M, DiPeri TP, Raso MG, Zheng X, Rizvi YQ, Evans KW, et al. Epigenetically upregulating TROP2 and SLFN11 enhances therapeutic efficacy of TROP2 antibody drug conjugate sacitizumab govitecan. npj Breast Cancer. 2023;9(1):66. pmid:37567892
  40. 40. Zhang C, Zhu Q, He H, Jiang L, Qiang Q, Hu L, et al. RIZ1: a potential tumor suppressor in glioma. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):990. pmid:26690953
  41. 41. Xue Y, Chen R, Du W, Yang F, Wei X. RIZ1 and histone methylation status in pituitary adenomas. Tumor Biology. 2017;39(7):1010428317711794. pmid:28718376
  42. 42. Romualdo GR, Heidor R, Bacil GP, Moreno FS, Barbisan LF. Past, present, and future of chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis rodent models: Perspectives concerning classic and new cancer hallmarks. Life Sciences. 2023;330:121994. pmid:37543357
  43. 43. Steele-Perkins G, Fang W, Yang X-H, Van Gele M, Carling T, Gu J, et al. Tumor formation and inactivation of RIZ1, an Rb-binding member of a nuclear protein–methyltransferase superfamily. Genes & development. 2001;15(17):2250–62. pmid:11544182
  44. 44. Saha Roy S, Vadlamudi RK. Role of Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer Metastasis. International Journal of Breast Cancer. 2012;2012:654698. pmid:22295247
  45. 45. Mann M, Cortez V, Vadlamudi RK. Epigenetics of Estrogen Receptor Signaling: Role in Hormonal Cancer Progression and Therapy. Cancers. 2011;3(2):1691–707. pmid:21814622
  46. 46. Yang T, Ren C, Jiang A, Yu Z, Li G, Wang G, et al. RIZ1 is regulated by estrogen and suppresses tumor progression in endometrial cancer. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2017;489(2):96–102. pmid:28528974
  47. 47. Di Zazzo E, Porcile C, Bartollino S, Moncharmont B. Critical Function of PRDM2 in the Neoplastic Growth of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors. Biology. 2016;5(4). pmid:27983647
  48. 48. Takeshita T, Tokumaru Y, Oshi M, Wu R, Patel A, Tian W, et al. Clinical relevance of estrogen reactivity in the breast cancer microenvironment. Frontiers in oncology. 2022;12:865024. pmid:35677163
  49. 49. Kozieł MJ, Piastowska-Ciesielska AW. Estrogens, Estrogen Receptors and Tumor Microenvironment in Ovarian Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(19). pmid:37834120
  50. 50. Hunsawong T, Singsuksawat E, In-chon N, Chawengrattanachot W, Thuwajit C, Sripa B, et al. Estrogen is increased in male cholangiocarcinoma patients’ serum and stimulates invasion in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines in vitro. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2012;138(8):1311–20. pmid:22476540
  51. 51. Khaenam P, Niibori A, Okada S, Jearanaikoon P, Araki N, Limpaiboon T. Contribution of RIZ1 to regulation of proliferation and migration of a liver fluke-related cholangiocarcinoma cell. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4007–11. pmid:23098508
  52. 52. Neve RM, Chin K, Fridlyand J, Yeh J, Baehner FL, Fevr T, et al. A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer cell. 2006;10(6):515–27. pmid:17157791
  53. 53. Mullighan CG, Goorha S, Radtke I, Miller CB, Coustan-Smith E, Dalton JD, et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature. 2007;446(7137):758–64. pmid:17344859
  54. 54. Shen A, Chen Y, Liu L, Huang Y, Chen H, Qi F, et al. EBF1-Mediated Upregulation of Ribosome Assembly Factor PNO1 Contributes to Cancer Progression by Negatively Regulating the p53 Signaling Pathway. Cancer Res. 2019;79(9):2257–70. pmid:30862720
  55. 55. Xing M, Ooi WF, Tan J, Qamra A, Lee PH, Li Z, et al. Genomic and epigenomic EBF1 alterations modulate TERT expression in gastric cancer. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(6):3005–20. pmid:32364535
  56. 56. Armartmuntree N, Murata M, Techasen A, Yongvanit P, Loilome W, Namwat N, et al. Prolonged oxidative stress down-regulates Early B cell factor 1 with inhibition of its tumor suppressive function against cholangiocarcinoma genesis. Redox biology. 2018;14:637–44. pmid:29169115
  57. 57. Mesuraca M, Chiarella E, Scicchitano S, Codispoti B, Giordano M, Nappo G, et al. ZNF423 and ZNF521: EBF1 Antagonists of Potential Relevance in B-Lymphoid Malignancies. BioMed research international. 2015;2015:165238. pmid:26788497
  58. 58. Chaiprasert T, Armartmuntree N, Techasen A, Sakonsinsiri C, Pinlaor S, Ungarreevittaya P, et al. Roles of Zinc Finger Protein 423 in Proliferation and Invasion of Cholangiocarcinoma through Oxidative Stress. Biomolecules. 2019;9(7):263. pmid:31284679
  59. 59. Lotesto M, Raimondi S. EBF1 Exhibits Crosstalk Regulation with ERα and ERβ in Some Hormone-Based Cancers. OBM Genetics. 2020;04(04):117.
  60. 60. Mantovani F, Collavin L, Del Sal G. Mutant p53 as a guardian of the cancer cell. Cell death and differentiation. 2019;26(2):199–212. pmid:30538286
  61. 61. Kiba T, Tsuda H, Pairojkul C, Inoue S, Sugimura T, Hirohashi S. Mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene and the ras gene family in intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinomas in Japan and Thailand. Mol Carcinog. 1993;8(4):312–8. pmid:8280380
  62. 62. Puetkasichonpasutha J, Namwat N, Sa-Ngiamwibool P, Titapun A, Suthiphongchai T. Evaluation of p53 and Its Target Gene Expression as Potential Biomarkers of Cholangiocarcinoma in Thai Patients. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP. 2020;21(3):791–8. pmid:32212809
  63. 63. Jusakul A, Cutcutache I, Yong CH, Lim JQ, Huang MN, Padmanabhan N, et al. Whole-Genome and Epigenomic Landscapes of Etiologically Distinct Subtypes of Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(10):1116–35. pmid:28667006
  64. 64. Titapun A, Techasen A, Sa-Ngiamwibool P, Sithithaworn P, Luvira V, Srisuk T, et al. Serum IgG as a Marker for Opisthorchis viverrini-Associated Cholangiocarcinoma Correlated with HER2 Overexpression. International journal of general medicine. 2020;13:1271–83. pmid:33273846
  65. 65. Wynn CS, Tang SC. Anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic breast cancer: many choices and future directions. Cancer metastasis reviews. 2022;41(1):193–209. pmid:35142964
  66. 66. Sriraksa R, Zeller C, Dai W, Siddiq A, Walley AJ, Limpaiboon T, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation at genes associated with a stem cell-like phenotype in cholangiocarcinoma tumors. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013;6(12):1348–55. pmid:24089088
  67. 67. Ye F, Zhang S-F, Xie X, Lu W-G. OPCML gene promoter methylation and gene expression in tumor and stroma cells of invasive cervical carcinoma. Cancer investigation. 2008;26(6):569–74. pmid:18584347
  68. 68. Khamko R, Daduang J, Settasatian C, Limpaiboon T. OPCML Exerts Antitumor Effects in Cholangiocarcinoma via AXL/STAT3 Inactivation and Rho GTPase Down-regulation. Cancer genomics & proteomics. 2021;18(6):771–80. pmid:34697068
  69. 69. Bouras E, Karakioulaki M, Bougioukas KI, Aivaliotis M, Tzimagiorgis G, Chourdakis M. Gene promoter methylation and cancer: An umbrella review. Gene. 2019;710:333–40. pmid:31202904
  70. 70. Razin A, Cedar H. DNA methylation and gene expression. Microbiol Rev. 1991;55(3):451–8. pmid:1943996
  71. 71. Lee YM, Lee JY, Kim MJ, Bae HI, Park JY, Kim SG, et al. Hypomethylation of the protein gene product 9.5 promoter region in gallbladder cancer and its relationship with clinicopathological features. Cancer Sci. 2006;97(11):1205–10. pmid:16965602
  72. 72. Mondal M, Conole D, Nautiyal J, Tate EW. UCHL1 as a novel target in breast cancer: emerging insights from cell and chemical biology. British Journal of Cancer. 2022;126(1):24–33. pmid:34497382
  73. 73. Schröder C, Milde-Langosch K, Gebauer F, Schmid K, Mueller V, Wirtz RM, et al. Prognostic relevance of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) mRNA and protein expression in breast cancer patients. Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology. 2013;139:1745–55. pmid:23996067
  74. 74. Yamazaki T, Hibi K, Takase T, Tezel E, Nakayama H, Kasai Y, et al. PGP9.5 as a marker for invasive colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(1):192–5. pmid:11801558
  75. 75. Krimpenfort P, Ijpenberg A, Song JY, van der Valk M, Nawijn M, Zevenhoven J, et al. p15Ink4b is a critical tumour suppressor in the absence of p16Ink4a. Nature. 2007;448(7156):943–6. pmid:17713536
  76. 76. Perry A, Banerjee R, Lohse CM, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Scheithauer BW. A role for chromosome 9p21 deletions in the malignant progression of meningiomas and the prognosis of anaplastic meningiomas. Brain Pathol. 2002;12(2):183–90. pmid:11958372
  77. 77. Peng Y, Chen Y, Song M, Zhang X, Li P, Yu X, et al. Co-occurrence of CDKN2A/B and IFN-I homozygous deletions correlates with an immunosuppressive phenotype and poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2022;16(8):1746–60. pmid:35253368
  78. 78. Ruan Y, Xie L, Zou A. Association of CDKN2A/B mutations, PD-1, and PD-L1 with the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2023;149(12):10841–50. pmid:37314514
  79. 79. Safwan-Zaiter H, Wagner N, Wagner KD. P16INK4A-More Than a Senescence Marker. Life (Basel). 2022;12(9). pmid:36143369
  80. 80. Cilluffo D, Barra V, Di Leonardo A. P14(ARF): The Absence that Makes the Difference. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(7). pmid:32698529
  81. 81. Tramontano A, Boffo FL, Russo G, De Rosa M, Iodice I, Pezone A. Methylation of the Suppressor Gene p16INK4a: Mechanism and Consequences. Biomolecules. 2020;10(3):446. pmid:32183138
  82. 82. Lee S, Kim WH, Jung HY, Yang MH, Kang GH. Aberrant CpG island methylation of multiple genes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2002;161(3):1015–22. pmid:12213730
  83. 83. Geiman TM, Muegge K. DNA methylation in early development. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010;77(2):105–13. pmid:19921744
  84. 84. Liu X, Yue P, Khuri FR, Sun SY. Decoy receptor 2 (DcR2) is a p53 target gene and regulates chemosensitivity. Cancer Res. 2005;65(20):9169–75. pmid:16230375
  85. 85. Shivapurkar N, Toyooka S, Toyooka KO, Reddy J, Miyajima K, Suzuki M, et al. Aberrant methylation of trail decoy receptor genes is frequent in multiple tumor types. Int J Cancer. 2004;109(5):786–92. pmid:14999791
  86. 86. Esteller M. Epigenetics provides a new generation of oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(2):179–83. pmid:16404435
  87. 87. Zhou Y, Zheng S, Luo Q, Huang X, Zhou Y, Li Z. Hypermethylation of DcR1, DcR2, DR4, DR5 gene promoters and clinical significance in tongue carcinoma. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2019;40(6):102258. pmid:31399243
  88. 88. Baharudin R, Tieng FYF, Lee LH, Ab Mutalib NS. Epigenetics of SFRP1: The Dual Roles in Human Cancers. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(2). pmid:32074995
  89. 89. Cheng L-C, Chao Y-J, Overman MJ, Wang CY, Phan NN, Chen Y-L, et al. Increased expression of secreted frizzled related protein 1 (SFRP1) predicts ampullary adenocarcinoma recurrence. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):13255. pmid:32764696
  90. 90. Amornpisutt R, Proungvitaya S, Jearanaikoon P, Limpaiboon T. DNA methylation level of OPCML and SFRP1: a potential diagnostic biomarker of cholangiocarcinoma. Tumor Biology. 2015;36(7):4973–8. pmid:25652468
  91. 91. Wang C, Feng Y, Zhang C, Cheng D, Wu R, Yang Y, et al. PTEN deletion drives aberrations of DNA methylome and transcriptome in different stages of prostate cancer. Faseb j. 2020;34(1):1304–18. pmid:31914691
  92. 92. Yothaisong S, Thanee M, Namwat N, Yongvanit P, Boonmars T, Puapairoj A, et al. Opisthorchis viverrini infection activates the PI3K/ AKT/PTEN and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways in a Cholangiocarcinogenesis model. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(23):10463–8.
  93. 93. Prasopdee S, Yingchutrakul Y, Roytrakul S, Pholhelm M, Phanaksri T, Kunjantarachot A, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit beta as a potential biomarker for Opisthorchis viverrini infection and cholangiocarcinoma. Parasitology. 2022;149(2):171–80. pmid:35234600
  94. 94. Kumar S. P53 induction accompanying G2/M arrest upon knockdown of tumor suppressor HIC1 in U87MG glioma cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;395(1–2):281–90. pmid:24992983
  95. 95. Nutthasirikul N, Hahnvajanawong C, Techasen A, Limpaiboon T, Leelayuwat C, Chau-In S, et al. Targeting the Δ133p53 isoform can restore chemosensitivity in 5-fluorouracil-resistant cholangiocarcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2015;47(6):2153–64.
  96. 96. Kim KH, Roberts CW. Targeting EZH2 in cancer. Nat Med. 2016;22(2):128–34. pmid:26845405
  97. 97. Simon JA, Lange CA. Roles of the EZH2 histone methyltransferase in cancer epigenetics. Mutation research. 2008;647(1–2):21–9. pmid:18723033
  98. 98. Zhang J, Chen W, Ma W, Han C, Song K, Kwon H, et al. EZH2 Promotes Cholangiocarcinoma Development and Progression through Histone Methylation and microRNA-Mediated Down-Regulation of Tumor Suppressor Genes. Am J Pathol. 2022;192(12):1712–24. pmid:36456043
  99. 99. Wasenang W, Puapairoj A, Settasatian C, Proungvitaya S, Limpaiboon T. Overexpression of polycomb repressive complex 2 key components EZH2/SUZ12/EED as an unfavorable prognostic marker in cholangiocarcinoma. Pathology—Research and Practice. 2019;215(7):152451. pmid:31126817
  100. 100. Bracken AP, Pasini D, Capra M, Prosperini E, Colli E, Helin K. EZH2 is downstream of the pRB-E2F pathway, essential for proliferation and amplified in cancer. Embo j. 2003;22(20):5323–35. pmid:14532106
  101. 101. Stazi G, Taglieri L, Nicolai A, Romanelli A, Fioravanti R, Morrone S, et al. Dissecting the role of novel EZH2 inhibitors in primary glioblastoma cell cultures: effects on proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration, and on the pro-inflammatory phenotype. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11(1):173. pmid:31791385
  102. 102. Højfeldt JW, Laugesen A, Willumsen BM, Damhofer H, Hedehus L, Tvardovskiy A, et al. Accurate H3K27 methylation can be established de novo by SUZ12-directed PRC2. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2018;25(3):225–32. pmid:29483650
  103. 103. Cao Q, Wang X, Zhao M, Yang R, Malik R, Qiao Y, et al. The central role of EED in the orchestration of polycomb group complexes. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3127. pmid:24457600
  104. 104. Tomassi S, Romanelli A, Zwergel C, Valente S, Mai A. Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 Modulation through the Development of EZH2-EED Interaction Inhibitors and EED Binders. J Med Chem. 2021;64(16):11774–97. pmid:34351144
  105. 105. Wan G, Feng H, Su C, Zhu Y, Zhang L, Zhang Q, et al. A patent review of EZH2 inhibitors from 2017 and beyond. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents. 2023;33(4):293–308. pmid:37095742
  106. 106. Agrawal A, Balcı H, Hanspers K, Coort SL, Martens M, Slenter DN, et al. WikiPathways 2024: next generation pathway database. Nucleic acids research. 2024;52(D1):D679–D89. pmid:37941138
  107. 107. Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Nastou KC, Lyon D, Kirsch R, Pyysalo S, et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein–protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Research. 2020;49(D1):D605–D12.
  108. 108. Liu J, Xiao Q, Xiao J, Niu C, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signalling: function, biological mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2022;7(1):3.
  109. 109. Schinner S, Willenberg HS, Schott M, Scherbaum WA. Pathophysiological aspects of Wnt-signaling in endocrine disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(5):731–7. pmid:19246555
  110. 110. Wen N, Guo B, Zheng H, Xu L, Liang H, Wang Q, et al. Bromodomain inhibitor jq1 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of glioma stem cells through the VEGF/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 2019;55(4):879–95. pmid:31485609
  111. 111. Li B, Li A, You Z, Xu J, Zhu S. Epigenetic silencing of CDKN1A and CDKN2B by SNHG1 promotes the cell cycle, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death & Disease. 2020;11(10):823. pmid:33009370
  112. 112. Savio AJ. The Dynamic Interplay of Epigenetics and Genetics in Selected DNA Mismatch Repair and Wnt Signaling Pathway Genes in Colorectal Cancer: University of Toronto (Canada); 2017.
  113. 113. Guan J, Li G-M. DNA mismatch repair in cancer immunotherapy. NAR Cancer. 2023;5(3). pmid:37325548
  114. 114. Irina T, Valentina S, Valeriu T, Victor S, Jean CA, Mariela V-S, et al. #103 Epigenetic silencing of MLH1 as a prognostic factor for endometrial cancer recurrence. 2023;33(Suppl 3):A131–A2.
  115. 115. Martínez-Marcial LA, Jacinto-Alemán LF, Trejo-Remigio DA, Ramírez-Martínez CM, Leyva-Huerta ERJO-IJoDS. Methylation analysis of Rb, P16, MGMT, and hMLH-1in mucoepidermoid carcinomas. A pilot study. 2023;25(2):123–32.
  116. 116. Gao D, Herman JG, Guo M. The clinical value of aberrant epigenetic changes of DNA damage repair genes in human cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(24):37331–46. pmid:26967246
  117. 117. Liang Q, Li W, Zhao Z, Fu Q. Advancement of Wnt signal pathway and the target of breast cancer. Open Life Sciences. 2016;11(1):98–104.
  118. 118. Starker LF, Svedlund J, Udelsman R, Dralle H, Akerström G, Westin G, et al. The DNA methylome of benign and malignant parathyroid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50(9):735–45. pmid:21638518
  119. 119. Lipovka Y, Konhilas JP. The complex nature of oestrogen signalling in breast cancer: enemy or ally? Biosci Rep. 2016;36(3). pmid:27160081
  120. 120. Stoyanova T, Goldstein AS, Cai H, Drake JM, Huang J, Witte ON. Regulated proteolysis of Trop2 drives epithelial hyperplasia and stem cell self-renewal via β-catenin signaling. Genes Dev. 2012;26(20):2271–85.
  121. 121. Toumi M, Mathe I. Trop2: A Key Player in Oncology-From Research to Clinical Application. J Gene Engg Bio Res. 2023;5(2):124–32.
  122. 122. Griffin MJ, Zhou Y, Kang S, Zhang X, Mikkelsen TS, Rosen ED. Early B-cell factor-1 (EBF1) is a key regulator of metabolic and inflammatory signaling pathways in mature adipocytes. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2013;288(50):35925–39. pmid:24174531
  123. 123. Isomoto H, Mott JL, Kobayashi S, Werneburg NW, Bronk SF, Haan S, et al. Sustained IL-6/STAT-3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma cells due to SOCS-3 epigenetic silencing. 2007;132(1):384–96. pmid:17241887
  124. 124. Purwaningrum M, Giachelli CM, Osathanon T, Rattanapuchpong S, Sawangmake C. Dissecting specific Wnt components governing osteogenic differentiation potential by human periodontal ligament stem cells through interleukin-6. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):9055. pmid:37270571
  125. 125. Sripa B, Thinkhamrop B, Mairiang E, Laha T, Kaewkes S, Sithithaworn P, et al. Elevated plasma IL-6 associates with increased risk of advanced fibrosis and cholangiocarcinoma in individuals infected by Opisthorchis viverrini. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2012;6(5):e1654. pmid:22629477
  126. 126. Promthet S, Songserm N, Woradet S, Pientong C, Ekalaksananan T, Wiangnon S, et al. Opisthorchiasis with proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) polymorphisms influence risk of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand: a nested case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):846.
  127. 127. Yoshida Y, Yamasaki S, Oi K, Kuranobu T, Nojima T, Miyaki S, et al. IL-1β Enhances Wnt Signal by Inhibiting DKK1. Inflammation. 2018;41(5):1945–54.
  128. 128. Kutlu A, Arda M, Atak E, Ulukaya EJIJoMB. Identification of key genes and pathways for cholangiocarcinoma using an integrated bioinformatics analysis. 2022;5(3).
  129. 129. Krimpenfort P, Snoek M, Lambooij J-P, Song J-Y, van der Weide R, Bhaskaran R, et al. A natural WNT signaling variant potently synergizes with Cdkn2ab loss in skin carcinogenesis. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):1425. pmid:30926782
  130. 130. Schulz WA. Tumor Suppressor Genes. In: Schulz WA, editor. Molecular Biology of Human Cancers. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 97–120.
  131. 131. Illei PB, Rusch VW, Zakowski MF, Ladanyi M. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A and codeletion of the methylthioadenosine phosphorylase gene in the majority of pleural mesotheliomas. Clinical Cancer Research. 2003;9(6):2108–13. pmid:12796375
  132. 132. Cheng AS, Lau SS, Chen Y, Kondo Y, Li MS, Feng H, et al. EZH2-mediated concordant repression of Wnt antagonists promotes β-catenin-dependent hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2011;71(11):4028–39.
  133. 133. Shi B, Liang J, Yang X, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Wu H, et al. Integration of estrogen and Wnt signaling circuits by the polycomb group protein EZH2 in breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(14):5105–19. pmid:17502350
  134. 134. de Mello DC, Saito KC, Cristovão MM, Kimura ET, Fuziwara CS. Modulation of EZH2 Activity Induces an Antitumoral Effect and Cell Redifferentiation in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(9):7872. pmid:37175580
  135. 135. Chen Q, Zheng PS, Yang WT. EZH2-mediated repression of GSK-3β and TP53 promotes Wnt/β-catenin signaling-dependent cell expansion in cervical carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(24):36115–29.
  136. 136. Milan TM, Eskenazi APE, Oliveira LD, Silva GD, Bighetti-Trevisan RL, Freitas GP, et al. Interplay between EZH2/β-catenin in stemness of cisplatin-resistant HNSCC and their role as therapeutic targets. Cellular signalling. 2023;109:110773.
  137. 137. Liu L, Xiao B, Hirukawa A, Smith HW, Zuo D, Sanguin-Gendreau V, et al. Ezh2 promotes mammary tumor initiation through epigenetic regulation of the Wnt and mTORC1 signaling pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;120(33):e2303010120. pmid:37549258
  138. 138. Hösch NG, Martins BB, Alcantara QA, Bufalo MC, Neto BS, Chudzinki-Tavassi AM, et al. Wnt signaling is involved in crotalphine-induced analgesia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2023;959:176058. pmid:37739305
  139. 139. Singh V, Singh AP, Sharma I, Singh LC, Sharma J, Borthakar BB, et al. Epigenetic deregulations of Wnt/β-catenin and transforming growth factor beta-Smad pathways in esophageal cancer: Outcome of DNA methylation. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(1):192–203.
  140. 140. Cui Y, Ying Y, van Hasselt A, Ng KM, Yu J, Zhang Q, et al. OPCML is a broad tumor suppressor for multiple carcinomas and lymphomas with frequently epigenetic inactivation. PloS one. 2008;3(8):e2990. pmid:18714356
  141. 141. Prowald A, Cronauer MV, von Klot C, Eilers T, Rinnab L, Herrmann T, et al. Modulation of beta-catenin-mediated TCF-signalling in prostate cancer cell lines by wild-type and mutant p53. The Prostate. 2007;67(16):1751–60. pmid:17929268
  142. 142. Xiao Q, Werner J, Venkatachalam N, Boonekamp KE, Ebert MP, Zhan T. Cross-Talk between p53 and Wnt Signaling in Cancer. Biomolecules. 2022;12(3). pmid:35327645
  143. 143. Tangkawattana S, Kaewkes S, Pairojkul C, Tangkawattana P, Sripa B. Mutations of KRAS and TP53 in a minor proportion of Opisthorchis viverrini-associated cholangiocarcinomas in a hamster model. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP. 2008;9(1):101–6. pmid:18439086
  144. 144. Powell E, Piwnica-Worms D, Piwnica-Worms H. Contribution of p53 to metastasis. Cancer discovery. 2014;4(4):405–14. pmid:24658082
  145. 145. Zhang X, Li C, Wu Y, Cui P. The research progress of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in colorectal cancer. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology. 2023;47(3):102086.
  146. 146. Hiremath IS, Goel A, Warrier S, Kumar AP, Sethi G, Garg M. The multidimensional role of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in human malignancies. Journal of cellular physiology. 2022;237(1):199–238.
  147. 147. Liu F, Wang L, Perna F, Nimer SD. Beyond transcription factors: how oncogenic signalling reshapes the epigenetic landscape. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2016;16(6):359–72. pmid:27220480
  148. 148. Szklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, Nastou K, Mehryary F, Hachilif R, et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein–protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Research. 2022;51(D1):D638–D46.
  149. 149. Boonmars T, Wu Z, Boonjaruspinyo S, Pinlaor S, Nagano I, Takahashi Y, et al. Alterations of gene expression of RB pathway in Opisthorchis viverrini infection-induced cholangiocarcinoma. Parasitology research. 2009;105(5):1273–81. pmid:19582476
  150. 150. Delmas V, Beermann F, Martinozzi S, Carreira S, Ackermann J, Kumasaka M, et al. β-Catenin induces immortalization of melanocytes by suppressing p16INK4a expression and cooperates with N-Ras in melanoma development. 2007;21(22):2923–35.
  151. 151. Bretones G, Delgado MD, León J. Myc and cell cycle control. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2015;1849(5):506–16. pmid:24704206
  152. 152. Lozano E, Sanchon-Sanchez P, Morente-Carrasco A, Chinchilla-Tábora LM, Mauriz JL, Fernández-Palanca P, et al. Impact of Aberrant β-Catenin Pathway on Cholangiocarcinoma Heterogeneity. Cells. 2023;12(8).
  153. 153. Zhang GF, Qiu L, Yang SL, Wu JC, Liu TJ. Wnt/β-catenin signaling as an emerging potential key pharmacological target in cholangiocarcinoma. Bioscience reports. 2020;40(3).
  154. 154. Mazon M, Larouche V, St-Louis M, Schindler D, Carreau M. Elevated blood levels of Dickkopf-1 are associated with acute infections. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2018;6(4):428–34. pmid:30028084
  155. 155. Park MH, Shin JH, Bothwell ALM, Chae WJ. Dickkopf proteins in pathological inflammatory diseases. J Leukoc Biol. 2022;111(4):893–901. pmid:34890067
  156. 156. Jarman EJ, Horcas-Lopez M, Waddell SH, MacMaster S, Gournopanos K, Soong DYH, et al. DKK1 drives immune suppressive phenotypes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and can be targeted with anti-DKK1 therapeutic DKN-01. Liver Int. 2023;43(1):208–20. pmid:35924447
  157. 157. Shi RY, Yang XR, Shen QJ, Yang LX, Xu Y, Qiu SJ, et al. High expression of Dickkopf-related protein 1 is related to lymphatic metastasis and indicates poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients after surgery. Cancer. 2013;119(5):993–1003. pmid:23132676
  158. 158. Surapaitoon A, Suttiprapa S, Khuntikeo N, Pairojkul C, Sripa B. Cytokine profiles in Opisthorchis viverrini stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from cholangiocarcinoma patients. Parasitol Int. 2017;66(1):889–92. pmid:27769807
  159. 159. Li X, Wang J, Zhu S, Zheng J, Xie Y, Jiang H, et al. DKK1 activates noncanonical NF-κB signaling via IL-6–induced CKAP4 receptor in multiple myeloma. Blood Advances. 2021;5(18):3656–67.
  160. 160. Ma B, Hottiger MO. Crosstalk between Wnt/β-Catenin and NF-κB Signaling Pathway during Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2016;7:378.
  161. 161. Loilome W, Yooyuen S, Namwat N, Sithithaworn P, Puapairoj A, Kano J, et al. PRKAR1A overexpression is associated with increased ECPKA autoantibody in liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma: application for assessment of the risk group. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 2012;33(6):2289–98. pmid:22922884
  162. 162. Lee J-E, Song W-J, Lee H, Kim B-G, Kim T, Lee C, et al. AniScan Using Extracellular Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase A as a Serum Biomarker Assay for the Diagnosis of Malignant Tumors in Dogs. 2020;20(15):4075.
  163. 163. Loilome W, Juntana S, Namwat N, Bhudhisawasdi V, Puapairoj A, Sripa B, et al. PRKAR1A is overexpressed and represents a possible therapeutic target in human cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(1):34–44. pmid:20824711
  164. 164. Ruangsuwast A, Smout MJ, Brindley PJ, Loukas A, Laha T, Chaiyadet S. Tetraspanins from Opisthorchis viverrini stimulate cholangiocyte migration and inflammatory cytokine production. bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology. 2023.
  165. 165. Zhao S, Wang J, Qin CJJoE, Research CC. Blockade of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling inhibits intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression and metastasis via inactivation of canonical Wnt pathway. 2014;33(1):1–12. pmid:25471741
  166. 166. Zhao S, Wang J, Qin C. Blockade of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling inhibits intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression and metastasis via inactivation of canonical Wnt pathway. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research: CR. 2014;33(1):103. pmid:25471741
  167. 167. Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities. Cell. 2017;169(6):985–99.
  168. 168. Xu Y, Liu J, Tian Y, Wang Z, Song Z, Li K, et al. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway Is Strongly Implicated in Cadmium-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity and Neuroinflammation: Clues from Zebrafish Neurobehavior and In Vivo Neuroimaging. International journal of molecular sciences. 2022;23(19).
  169. 169. Kahn M. Can we safely target the WNT pathway? Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2014;13(7):513–32. pmid:24981364
  170. 170. Miranda Furtado CL, Dos Santos Luciano MC, Silva Santos RD, Furtado GP, Moraes MO, Pessoa C. Epidrugs: targeting epigenetic marks in cancer treatment. Epigenetics. 2019;14(12):1164–76. pmid:31282279
  171. 171. Yu F, Yu C, Li F, Zuo Y, Wang Y, Yao L, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cancers and targeted therapies. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2021;6(1):307.
  172. 172. O’Hagan K. Updates in Cholangiocarcinoma. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2022;13(3):320–3. pmid:35663158
  173. 173. Wang N, Huang A, Kuang B, Xiao Y, Xiao Y, Ma H. Progress in Radiotherapy for Cholangiocarcinoma. Front Oncol. 2022;12:868034. pmid:35515132
  174. 174. Zhan T, Rindtorff N, Boutros M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36(11):1461–73. pmid:27617575
  175. 175. Liu Q, Qu X, Xie X, He P, Huang S. Repression of Akt3 gene transcription by the tumor suppressor RIZ1. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):1528. pmid:29367689
  176. 176. Xiaolei X, Peixin J, Jinghong Z, Junjian M, Kefan W, Kangyi Z. A review of RIZ1 regulation of the signal pathways in obesity and tumors. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Medical Science). 2023;43(1).
  177. 177. Qiu Z, Guo W, Dong B, Wang Y, Deng P, Wang C, et al. EBF1 promotes triple-negative breast cancer progression by surveillance of the HIF1α pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119(28):e2119518119.
  178. 178. Györy I, Boller S, Nechanitzky R, Mandel E, Pott S, Liu E, et al. Transcription factor Ebf1 regulates differentiation stage-specific signaling, proliferation, and survival of B cells. Genes & development. 2012;26(7):668–82. pmid:22431510
  179. 179. Araos J, Sleeman JP, Garvalov BKJC, metastasis e. The role of hypoxic signalling in metastasis: towards translating knowledge of basic biology into novel anti-tumour strategies. 2018;35(7):563–99.
  180. 180. Bheda A, Yue W, Gullapalli A, Whitehurst C, Liu R, Pagano JS, et al. Positive reciprocal regulation of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 and beta-catenin/TCF signaling. PLoS One. 2009;4(6):e5955. pmid:19536331
  181. 181. Mandelker DL, Yamashita K, Tokumaru Y, Mimori K, Howard DL, Tanaka Y, et al. PGP9. 5 promoter methylation is an independent prognostic factor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer research. 2005;65(11):4963–8. pmid:15930319
  182. 182. Shenoy US, Adiga D, Kabekkodu SP, Hunter KD, Radhakrishnan R. Molecular implications of HOX genes targeting multiple signaling pathways in cancer. Cell Biology and Toxicology. 2022;38(1):1–30. pmid:34617205
  183. 183. Zhong B, Liao Q, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang J. The roles of epigenetic regulation in cholangiocarcinogenesis. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2023;166:115290. pmid:37557012
  184. 184. Ricuphan K, Wiphawan W, Jureerut D, Chatri S, Temduang L. Combined OPCML and AXL Expression as a Prognostic Marker and OPCML Enhances AXL Inhibitor in Cholangiocarcinoma. In Vivo. 2022;36(3):1168. pmid:35478117
  185. 185. Ishikawa S, Ito K. Plasticity and regulatory mechanisms of Hox gene expression in mouse neural crest cells. Cell and tissue research. 2009;337(3):381–91. pmid:19585150
  186. 186. Rapani E, Sacchetti A, Corda D, Alberti SJIjoc. Human Trop-2 is a tumor-associated calcium signal transducer. 1998;76(5):671–6. pmid:9610724
  187. 187. Cubas R, Zhang S, Li M, Chen C, Yao Q. Trop2 expression contributes to tumor pathogenesis by activating the ERK MAPK pathway. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:253. pmid:20858281