Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Histoplasma capsulatum urinary antigen detection in a kidney transplant recipient with acute paracoccidioidomycosis: Case study and literature review

  • Matheus Oliveira Bastos,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Serviço de Atenção de Pacientes Internados, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Andréa Gina Varon,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Serviço de Atenção de Pacientes Internados, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Pedro Henrique Nascimento Theodoro,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Serviço de Atenção de Pacientes Internados, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Eduardo Mastrangelo Marinho Falcão,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Dermatologia Infecciosa, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Rosely Maria Zancopé-Oliveira,

    Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Antonio Carlos Francesconi do Valle,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Dermatologia Infecciosa, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Rodrigo Almeida-Paes,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Priscila Marques de Macedo

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    priscila.marques@ini.fiocruz.br

    Affiliation Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Dermatologia Infecciosa, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Background

Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) and histoplasmosis are endemic fungal diseases in South America. Both can lead to lung involvement with fungal dissemination progressing to systemic and severe clinical manifestations, especially in immunosuppressed hosts. As the population of immunosuppressed individuals has been rising, a higher occurrence of fungal infections is predicted in this setting. This poses challenges regarding the differential diagnosis due to overlapping clinical and laboratorial findings, hampering the management of cases.

Objectives

In this study, the authors discuss the occurrence of a false-positive Histoplasma urinary antigen detection in a kidney transplant recipient with acute PCM. Given the scarce information about this subject, a review on literature data is provided.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to investigate previous studies that found cross-reactivity between Histoplasma urinary antigen assays in human patients with confirmed diagnosis of PCM. Additionally, an update of PCM in transplant recipients is provided.

Findings

The included studies reported 120 samples from patients with PCM tested for Histoplasma antigen, presenting an overall cross-reactivity of 51.67% and 17 cases of PCM in transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: The galactomannan urinary antigen developed to diagnose histoplasmosis can cross react with PCM, which may represent a concern in countries where both mycoses overlap.

Author summary

Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) and histoplasmosis are severe fungal diseases occurring simultaneously in South America. They can cause similar clinical manifestations, especially in immunosuppressed hosts. This poses challenges regarding the differential diagnosis due to overlapping clinical and laboratorial findings, hampering the management of individual cases. In this study, the authors report the occurrence of a false-positive urinary test to detect histoplasmosis in a kidney transplant recipient with acute PCM. Given the scarce information about this subject, a review on literature data is provided. As conclusion, this study highlights the urinary test developed to diagnose histoplasmosis can cross react with PCM, which may represent a concern in countries where both mycoses overlap.

Introduction

Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) and histoplasmosis are both endemic fungal diseases in South America. Their causative agents are the thermally dimorphic fungi Paracoccidioides spp. and Histoplasma capsulatum, respectively. Human infections occur through inhalation of conidia and other infective fungal particles present in the environment [13]. Although clinical manifestations are distinct, both infections can lead to lung involvement with fungal dissemination progressing to systemic and severe manifestations, especially in immunosuppressed hosts [46]. As the population of immunosuppressed individuals has been rising as a consequence of advances in treatment and long-term survival of transplant recipients, autoinflammatory and autoimmune disorders, and cancer therapy, a higher occurrence of endemic and opportunistic fungal infections in South America in this population is predicted [7,8]. This poses a significant challenge regarding the differential diagnosis due to overlapping clinical and laboratorial (mostly serological cross-reactions) findings, hampering the clinical management of individual cases.

Proper and early diagnosis of fungal infections is crucial to decrease mortality rates [9]. However, gold-standard techniques in routine practice are still histopathology and fungal culture of clinical specimens, which requires time, laboratorial infrastructure, supplies, and well-trained staff, scarcely available in some endemic regions [1,10]. Delays in diagnosis result in increased morbidity and mortality, especially in transplant recipients, who present impaired cellular adaptive immune response. In this context, molecular techniques and antigen detection are good strategies for a rapid and presumptive diagnosis of invasive fungal infections [9,11,12]. One of the main advances in histoplasmosis diagnosis was the introduction of Histoplasma antigen detection, generally performed in urine samples. The overall sensitivity of this test is 92% in transplant recipients, but specificity is limited due to cross-reactivity with other fungal infections such as aspergillosis, and endemic mycoses as blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and talaromycosis which can result in inadequate diagnosis and clinical management [4,1316].

Paracoccidioides spp. are primary systemic fungal pathogens rarely affecting transplant recipients [17]. However, changes in PCM epidemiology with increased cases in urban areas [18], as well as increasing numbers of solid organ transplants (SOT) in Brazil, mostly occurring in urban areas [19], can lead to a higher occurrence of this fungal disease in this population. A recent review of PCM in immunosuppressed patients described 10 cases of this mycosis in SOT recipients reported in the literature during the 30-year-period studied [6]. Although half of those patients were considered to have chronic PCM, all cases showed an opportunistic clinical pattern of this fungal disease, more severe, invasive, requiring hospitalization, and with high mortality rates. Proper diagnosis and management of PCM in SOT are not evidence-based and the high false-negative rates of antibody-based detection tests, as well as the numerous drug interactions between immunosuppressants used after transplantation and itraconazole, the first-line antifungal used to treat PCM, are challenging issues. Additionally, the lack of recommendation if a secondary prophylaxis is required after the end of PCM treatment in the context of a sustained immunosuppressive condition is a matter of concern.

In the present study, the authors report a case of acute PCM in a kidney transplant recipient who presented a false-positive Histoplasma urinary antigen. We also conducted a literature review on cross-reactivity between this diagnostic test and PCM, as well as an update on literature data about PCM in SOT recipients. Key issues regarding potential challenges in the management of these cases are further discussed.

Methods

Ethical statements

The Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas Institutional Review Board approved this study (appreciation number 18524919.1.0000.5262). A written informed consent form was obtained from the participant of this study.

Case study

A 42-year-old male patient from the urban area of Nova Friburgo municipality (mountainous region of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil) first presented at our outpatient clinic in September 2022 with a history of multiple skin lesions evolving since 2021. Systemic symptoms consisted of low-grade daily fever, night sweats, weight loss, generalized lymphadenopathy, joint pain, dysphagia for solids, and hoarseness started in March 2022. He had a previous history of deceived-donor kidney transplant in 2016 due to a chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology and was under immunosuppression with tacrolimus 4 mg/day, sodium mycophenolate 720 mg/day, and prednisone 5 mg/day, reporting no history of rejection or opportunistic infections. He was living with other three healthy individuals in an apartment with an external area where they took care of plants. In addition, he reported no travels. He worked in a textile factory in the past and had a short-term job as taxi driver at the time of his first appointment in our institution. At admission, the patient presented diffuse lymph node enlargement in the cervical, supraclavicular, axillary, and inguinal chains. He also had single skin ulcers on the face, thorax, and left arm (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flat ulcerated skin lesion in the left arm of the patient participating in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012472.g001

Otorhinolaryngology evaluation showed a fine-grained infiltration of aryepiglottic and arytenoid folds. Neurological evaluation was normal. Laboratorial analyses showed mild anemia (hemoglobin 9.4 mg/dL), worsening kidney function (previous creatinine 1.4, after 1.81 mg/dL), high inflammatory markers (c-reactive protein 10 mg/dL, ferritin 775 mg/dL), and low LDH levels (98 UI/mL). Computed tomography showed generalized lymphadenopathies in mediastinal, mesenteric, iliac, and retroperitoneal chains, without liver or spleen alterations. Additionally, bilateral lung infiltrates were detected (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Computed tomography showing diffuse bilateral ground glass opacities, tree-in-bud sign (red circle), left upper lobe cavitation (red arrow), and mediastinal lymphadenopathy (blue arrow).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012472.g002

Sputum screening for tuberculosis using culture and GeneXpert MTB/RIF and anti-HIV antibodies were negative. Fungal direct microscopic examination of the sputum with 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) and serum cryptococcal antigen (IMMY diagnostics, Norman, OK, USA) were negative as well. Serum antibody detection using double immunodiffusion (DID) against antigens of Paracoccidioides spp., Histoplasma capsulatum, and Aspergillus spp. also yielded negative results. The Clarus Histoplasma Galactomanan Enzyme Immunoassay (IMMY diagnostics) from the urine was positive (2.234 EIA Units). Then, the patient was promptly started on liposomal amphotericin B (AmbL) with a presumptive diagnosis of progressive disseminated histoplasmosis.

A week later, direct microscopic examination of a tissue fragment obtained from the skin lesions showed Paracoccidioides sp. yeast-like cells. In addition, fungal cultures from the skin fragment and the sputum also yielded Paracoccidioides sp., after a month of incubation. A nested-polymerase chain reaction [20] from the sputum was conducted, to aid in the exclusion of histoplasmosis diagnosis, yielding negative results.

Given the underlying immunosuppressive condition of the patient and the subacute progression of the clinical symptoms, with the presence of fever, joint pain, disseminated lymph node involvement, disseminated skin lesions, and need for hospitalization, we made a final diagnosis of acute PCM. The patient received AmbL (3 mg/kg/day) for 14 days with general clinical improvement. However, treatment was changed to itraconazole (ITZ) 200 mg/day due to worsening kidney function and hyperkalemia. He was discharged with ITZ, which was further replaced by co-trimoxazole due to drug interactions with tacrolimus. The patient was still undergoing PCM treatment, when he died due to a non-related PCM cause (Epstein-Barr virus associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma affecting the central nervous system).

Literature review

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to investigate previous studies that found cross-reactivity between Histoplasma urinary antigen assays in human patients with confirmed diagnosis of PCM, using the following terms “cross-reactivity Histoplasma antigen” OR “Histoplasma urinary antigen”. Additionally, the following descriptors “Paracoccidioides” AND “transplant” were submitted to the same database aiming to search for articles reporting human cases of PCM in transplant recipients.

Both searches were conducted at PUBMED database, regardless the publication’s date, and included papers in English. Reviews and non-human models were excluded. Additional human case reports and cases series missed in the initial search strategy were carefully searched from the reference lists of the articles initially retrieved.

Results

In the literature review about Histoplasma urinary antigen assays, a total of 160 manuscripts were retrieved. Among them, twelve manuscripts about cross-reactivity between Histoplasma capsulatum urinary antigen assays in human patients with PCM, published between 1997 and 2023, were carefully selected [15,16,2131]. Table 1 shows details of these articles, including the method used for antigen detection, the number of samples from patients with PCM tested, the number of urine samples from participants with PCM that were reactive in Histoplasma antigen detection, and the cutoff values used in the study. The included studies reported a total of 120 samples from patients with PCM that were tested for Histoplasma antigen, presenting an overall cross-reactivity of 62/120 (51.67%). We excluded reference [30] from this list because of non-specified cross-reactivity rate.

thumbnail
Table 1. Manuscripts retrieved in the literature about cross reactivity of Histoplasma capsulatum urinary antigens with Paracoccidioides spp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012472.t001

With regards to the literature review on PCM occurring in SOT recipients, 15 articles were identified. Among them, five were reviews or animal studies, thus excluded from this work, totalizing 10 included papers [3241]. Additional four articles were incorporated into the present review from the reference lists of the 10 articles previously included [4245]. Among these 14 included papers, 12 reported individual cases of PCM after transplant [3239,4245]. Additionally, one retrospective study of necropsy findings in renal transplant recipients included four PCM cases [40]. Furthermore, one retrospective study performed on bronchoalveolar specimens collected from patients with pneumonia after lung transplant reporting one lung infection due to Paracoccidioides sp. [41]. Together, these studies document 17 patients. Table 2 summarizes the main data of the case herein reported as well as those from the previously published cases of PCM in transplant recipients retrieved in the literature search that the authors conducted.

thumbnail
Table 2. Manuscripts retrieved in the literature concerning paracoccidioidomycosis in solid organ transplant recipients with their main clinical and laboratorial findings.

Details of the case reported in the present study are also provided.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012472.t002

Discussion

Low- and middle-income countries have been facing a double burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases, with increasing prevalence of chronic conditions leading to higher need for SOT, and persistently high incidence of infectious diseases [46]. A previous literature review of PCM in immunosuppressed patients [6] identified 10 cases of PCM in SOT recipients during 30 years of the studied period, up to 2017 [3438,40,41]. Since then, we detected five additional cases of PCM in SOT [39,4245]. Although PCM after SOT is rare, this increasing number of published case reports could indicate a potential role of Paracoccidioides spp. as an emerging fungal pathogen causing acute and atypical manifestations in these patients.

In our case, the patient had no previous report of epidemiological risk activities for PCM infection. Therefore, we cannot estimate when fungal infection occurred. Although the highest incidence of infections in SOT recipients occurs during the first year after transplantation, most published cases of PCM in these patients report this occurrence after the first year. This may be probably due to the routine use of cotrimoxazole for Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis during the first year after transplantation, an antimicrobial also effective against Paracoccidioides spp. [6]. As our patient was in his 5th year after transplantation when PCM clinical symptoms first appeared, we envisage that it is more likely that the fungal exposure occurred not that long ago. Regardless the moment of infection, acute and chronic PCM are mostly classified based on the immunological response of the host and their resulting clinical findings. Due to the underlying immunosuppressive condition of our patient, the subacute clinical progression of the clinical symptoms with the presence of fever, joint pain, disseminated lymph node involvement, and disseminated skin lesions, this case was further diagnosed with acute PCM [1,47]. Noteworthy, the classification of PCM clinical forms in immunocompromised hosts can be challenging due to coexisting features of both acute and chronic forms, which was previously described in people living with HIV/AIDS as mixed form [47].

PCM epidemiology is changing over the last decades due to rampant deforestation, mechanization in the rural environment, and human migration across the country [17]. Reports have indicated the emergence of acute PCM in urban areas, notably in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil, the origin of the case presented here [18,48]. The PCM urbanization can represent a higher risk of infection for vulnerable populations [49,50]. In these cases, the clinical presentation may be atypical, leading to delay or misdiagnosis of this fungal disease [48]. This could mean an increased number of cases not identified due to the lack of routine surveillance or awareness from healthcare providers.

The laboratorial diagnosis of PCM in immunocompromised patients is particularly difficult. In the case herein presented, direct examination and fungal culture confirmed the PCM diagnosis. However, limitations of such methods are worth to mention. Microscopy is quick to perform, but has staff- and sample-dependent sensitivity [51,52]. Culture-based techniques and histopathology are resource and time-consuming and could lead to late diagnosis, with an impact on mortality [1,3].

Concerning the main techniques used for antibody detection, despite their good sensitivity and specificity, there is an increased incidence of false negative results in the context of the emergence of severe PCM disease and infection in immunosuppressed patients [1,6,51]. A single-center study revealed 84.2% positivity rate in DID tests among PCM patients living with HIV [49]. Nonetheless, the utility of serological tests in patients with other types of immunosuppression remains uncertain, due to the potential risk of false negative results in such context [6]. The results herein presented revealed 62.5% positivity in antibody-based immunologic tests for Paracoccidioides in the eight previously reported patients with PCM and SOT, suggesting that the efficacy of immunological tests for PCM in transplant-recipient may be lower than that observed in HIV-immunosuppressed patients. Besides, a high divergence on the in-house immunological methods among regional laboratories has been reported in Brazil, which is critical considering the different antigenic expression of the newly described Paracoccidioides species [53,54], and could potentially complicate the application of these methods in the clinical management of such patients.

In SOT recipients, early diagnosis of fungal infections is crucial for better outcomes, because immunosuppression can lead to rapid progression and worse clinical pictures. Some assays have been proposed as important tools for the rapid diagnosis of endemic mycoses such as cryptococcosis and histoplasmosis. A lateral-flow-based Histoplasma antigen detection in urine samples has been proposed as a novel and efficient diagnostic tool for the rapid diagnosis of disseminated histoplasmosis, due to its good performance [28]. However, the galactomannan antigen used in this assay is not specific for Histoplasma and cross-reactivity with other endemic fungi can limit its specificity notably in tropical countries where many endemic mycoses can present epidemiological overlap [15,16,2131]. Particularly, Paracoccidioides spp. present galactomannan in their cell-wall [55,56], sharing chemical and immunological characteristics with the H. capsulatum galactomannan [57], explaining, at least partially, the notable cross-reactivity determined in the current review.

The development of quick, easy-to-perform, and low cost tests presenting increased sensitivity and good specificity for the diagnosis of PCM in immunosuppressed patients is, therefore, imperative. Rapid tests based on antigen or another biomarker detection sharing a high overlap of the diagnostic target on the major agents of endemic mycoses is a high concern in settings where several endemic mycoses occur. Fortunately, severe presentations of endemic mycoses usually are successfully treated with amphotericin B, a broad-spectrum antifungal drug [58]. Therefore, the initial suspicion of disseminated histoplasmosis in our case did not change the first therapeutic choice that would be prescribed to treat severe acute PCM.

Alternatively, molecular methods are fast and safer alternatives to diagnose PCM directly from clinical samples, but they usually require high-cost infrastructures and consumables, and then they are not widely available in PCM endemic areas [59].

The study herein conducted calls attention to the emerging role of endemic mycoses, specifically PCM, as important causes of invasive fungal infection in SOT recipients. Better surveillance strategies as well as more rapid, accurate, and specific diagnostic tools are urgently needed to improve the diagnosis of opportunistic PCM in this vulnerable population.

Key learning points

  1. Healthcare providers must be aware of the increasing occurrence of PCM in urban areas, affecting immunosuppressed patients such as SOT recipients.
  2. PCM must be included in the differential diagnosis of other opportunistic mycoses in patients with underlying immunosuppressive conditions.
  3. False negative serological results can occur in the context of immunosuppression and the galactomannan urinary antigen developed to diagnose histoplasmosis can cross react with PCM, which may represent a concern in countries where both mycoses overlap.
  4. It is imperative to develop new rapid tests as those based on specific antigenic detection to improve the diagnosis of PCM in immunosuppressed patients and to refine current existing tests for histoplasmosis diagnosis, to reduce the occurrence of false-positive results.

Acknowledgments

The authors are sincerely grateful to Dr. Andrea D’Ávila Freitas MD, and to Dr. Marcelo Luiz Carvalho Gonçalves MD, for the clinical support offered to the patient from this study during his hospitalization. The authors also thank to Dr. Guis Saint Martin Astacio for kindly revising the radiological findings of Fig 2.

References

  1. 1. Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Mendes RP, Colombo AL, Queiroz-Telles FD, Kono ASG, Paniago AMM, et al. Brazilian guidelines for the clinical management of paracoccidioidomycosis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017;50:715–40. pmid:28746570
  2. 2. Taylor ML, Reyes-Montes MDR, Estrada-Bárcenas DA, Zancopé-Oliveira RM, Rodríguez-Arellanes G, Ramírez JA. Considerations about the Geographic Distribution of Histoplasma Species. Vives M, editor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022;88:e02010–21.
  3. 3. Taborda CP, Buccheri R, Benard G, Duarte-Neto AN, Nosanchuk JD, Travassos LR. Paracoccidioides spp. and Histoplasma capsulatum: Current and New Perspectives for Diagnosis and Treatment. Curr Top Med Chem. 2018;18:1333–48. pmid:30277157
  4. 4. Miller R, Assi M, the AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Endemic fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients—Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant. 2019;33:e13553.
  5. 5. Saullo JL, Miller RA. Updates on Histoplasmosis in Solid Organ Transplantation. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2022;16:165–78. pmid:36097519
  6. 6. De Almeida Jr. J, Peçanha-Pietrobom P, Colombo A. Paracoccidioidomycosis in Immunocompromised Patients: A Literature Review. J Fungi. 2018;5:2. pmid:30587784
  7. 7. Sifuentes-Osornio J, Corzo-León DE, Ponce-de-León LA. Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Infections in Latin America. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2012;6:23–34. pmid:22363832
  8. 8. Enoch DA, Yang H, Aliyu SH, Micallef C. The Changing Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Infections. In: Lion T, editor. Hum Fungal Pathog Identif [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2017 [cited 2024 May 6]. p. 17–65.
  9. 9. Fang W, Wu J, Cheng M, Zhu X, Du M, Chen C, et al. Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: challenges and recent developments. J Biomed Sci. 2023;30:42. pmid:37337179
  10. 10. Linder KA, Kauffman CA. Current and New Perspectives in the Diagnosis of Blastomycosis and Histoplasmosis. J Fungi. 2020;7:12. pmid:33383637
  11. 11. Jenks JD, White PL, Kidd SE, Goshia T, Fraley SI, Hoenigl M, et al. An update on current and novel molecular diagnostics for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2023;23:1135–52. pmid:37801397
  12. 12. Luethy PM. Point-of-Care Testing for the Diagnosis of Fungal Infections. Clin Lab Med. 2023;43:209–20.
  13. 13. Hage CA, Ribes JA, Wengenack NL, Baddour LM, Assi M, McKinsey DS, et al. A Multicenter Evaluation of Tests for Diagnosis of Histoplasmosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:448–54. pmid:21810734
  14. 14. Assi M, Martin S, Wheat LJ, Hage C, Freifeld A, Avery R, et al. Histoplasmosis After Solid Organ Transplant. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1542–9. pmid:24046304
  15. 15. Wheat J, Wheat H, Connolly P, Kleiman M, Supparatpinyo K, Nelson K, et al. Cross-Reactivity in Histoplasma capsulatum variety capsulatum Antigen Assays of Urine Samples from Patients with Endemic Mycoses. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:1169–71.
  16. 16. Connolly PA, Durkin MM, LeMonte AM, Hackett EJ, Wheat LJ. Detection of Histoplasma Antigen by a Quantitative Enzyme Immunoassay. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007;14:1587–91. pmid:17913863
  17. 17. Martinez R. New Trends in Paracoccidioidomycosis Epidemiology. J Fungi. 2017;3:1. pmid:29371520
  18. 18. Do Valle ACF, Marques De Macedo P, Almeida-Paes R, Romão AR, Lazéra MDS, Wanke B. Paracoccidioidomycosis after Highway Construction, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1917–9. pmid:29048286
  19. 19. Soares LSDS Brito ESD, Magedanz L França FA, Araújo WND, Galato D. Solid organ transplantation in Brazil: a descriptive study of distribution and access inequalities across the Brazilian territory, 2001–2017. Epidemiol E Serviços Saúde [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Aug 13];29.
  20. 20. Muñoz C, Gómez BL, Tobón A, Arango K, Restrepo A, Correa MM, et al. Validation and Clinical Application of a Molecular Method for Identification of Histoplasma capsulatum in Human Specimens in Colombia, South America. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:62–7.
  21. 21. Cloud JL, Bauman SK, Neary BP, Ludwig KG, Ashwood ER. Performance Characteristics of a Polyclonal Enzyme Immunoassay for the Quantitation of Histoplasma Antigen in Human Urine Samples. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128:18–22.
  22. 22. Garringer TO, Wheat LJ, Brizendine EJ. Comparison of an Established Antibody Sandwich Method with an Inhibition Method of Histoplasma capsulatum Antigen Detection. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2909–13.
  23. 23. Gomez BL, Figueroa JI, Hamilton AJ, Ortiz BL, Robledo MA, Restrepo A, et al. Development of a novel antigen detection test for histoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2618–22. pmid:9316918
  24. 24. Durkin MM, Connolly PA, Wheat LJ. Comparison of radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunoassay methods for detection of Histoplasma capsulatum var. capsulatum antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2252–5. pmid:9276396
  25. 25. Scheel CM, Samayoa B, Herrera A, Lindsley MD, Benjamin L, Reed Y, et al. Development and Evaluation of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay To Detect Histoplasma capsulatum Antigenuria in Immunocompromised Patients. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:852–8.
  26. 26. Caceres DH, Scheel CM, Tobón ÁM, Ahlquist Cleveland A, Restrepo Á, Brandt ME, et al. Validation of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay That Detects Histoplasma capsulatum Antigenuria in Colombian Patients with AIDS for Diagnosis and Follow-Up during Therapy. Alexander TS, editor. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21:1364–8. pmid:25008902
  27. 27. Cáceres DH, Samayoa BE, Medina NG, Tobón AM, Guzmán BJ, Mercado D, et al. Multicenter Validation of Commercial Antigenuria Reagents To Diagnose Progressive Disseminated Histoplasmosis in People Living with HIV/AIDS in Two Latin American Countries. Diekema DJ, editor. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e01959–17.
  28. 28. Cáceres DH, Gómez BL, Tobón ÁM, Minderman M, Bridges N, Chiller T, et al. Validation and Concordance Analysis of a New Lateral Flow Assay for Detection of Histoplasma Antigen in Urine. J Fungi. 2021;7:799. pmid:34682221
  29. 29. Abdallah W, Myint T, LaRue R, Minderman M, Gunn S, Wheat LJ, et al. Diagnosis of Histoplasmosis Using the MVista Histoplasma Galactomannan Antigen Qualitative Lateral Flow–Based Immunoassay: A Multicenter Study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8:ofab454. pmid:34557565
  30. 30. Cáceres DH, Gómez BL, Tobón ÁM, Chiller TM, Lindsley MD. Evaluation of OIDx Histoplasma Urinary Antigen EIA. Mycopathologia. 2022;187:129–31. pmid:34802111
  31. 31. Marin E, Messina FA, Romero M, Arechavala A, Negroni R, Depardo R, et al. Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay technique on detecting urinary Histoplasma capsulatum antigen in the diagnosis of disseminated histoplasmosis in Argentina. Medicina (Mex). 2023;83:863–74.
  32. 32. Sugar AM, Restrepo A, Stevens DA. Paracoccidioidomycosis in the immunosuppressed host: report of a case and review of the literature. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129:340–2. pmid:6320699
  33. 33. Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Duarte MIS, Nunes DF, Lacaz CS, Sabagga E, Abdala E, et al. Paracoccidioidomycosis in a renal transplant recipient. Med Mycol. 1995;33:411–4.
  34. 34. Zavascki AP, Bienardt JC, Severo LC. Paracoccidioidomycosis in organ transplant recipient: case report. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2004;46:279–81. pmid:15517034
  35. 35. Pontes AM, Borborema J, Correia CRB, De Almeida WL, Maciel RF. A Rare Paracoccidioidomycosis Diagnosis in a Kidney Transplant Receptor: Case Report. Transplant Proc. 2015;47:1048–50. pmid:26036516
  36. 36. Góes HFDO Durães SMB, Lima CDS Souza MBD, Vilar EAG Dalston MO. PARACOCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS IN A RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 May 6];58.
  37. 37. Radisic MV, Linares L, Afeltra J, Pujato N, Vitale RG, Bravo M, et al. Acute pulmonary involvement by paracoccidiodomycosis disease immediately after kidney transplantation: Case report and literature review. Transpl Infect Dis. 2017;19:e12655. pmid:28039947
  38. 38. Lima TC, Bezerra ROF, Siqueira LTDB, Menezes MRD, Leite CDC, Porta G, et al. Paracoccidioidomycosis in a liver transplant recipient. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017;50:138–40. pmid:28327818
  39. 39. Peçanha-Pietrobom PM, Falqueto A, Rodrigues Gandarella AD, Moyzés JV, Rangel KA, Miranda LB, et al. Case Report: Paracoccidioidomycosis in Solid Organ Transplantation: Disseminated Disease in a Liver Recipient and Literature Review. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;101:1100–6. pmid:31516118
  40. 40. Reis MA, Costa RS, Ferraz AS. Causes of death in renal transplant recipients: a study of 102 autopsies from 1968 to 1991. J R Soc Med. 1995;88:24–7. pmid:7884765
  41. 41. Campos S, Caramori M, Teixeira R, Afonso J, Carraro R, Strabelli T, et al. Bacterial and Fungal Pneumonias After Lung Transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2008;40:822–4. pmid:18455028
  42. 42. Sinkos C, Grillo TG, Bonini ACM, Cardoso LG, Watanabe EM, Cavalcante RDS, et al. Mixed and disseminated paracoccidioidomycosis after liver transplantation: Case report. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2021;32:25–9. pmid:33717862
  43. 43. Valentim FDO, Tsutsui GM, Abbade LPF, Marques SA. Disseminated paracoccidioidomycosis in a liver transplant patient. An Bras Dermatol. 2021;96:346–8. pmid:33775484
  44. 44. Felipe CRA, Silva AD, Moreira Guimarães Penido MG. Disseminated Paracoccidioidomycosis in a Kidney Transplant Recipient. Cureus [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 May 6].
  45. 45. Pereira FV, Alves KP de O, Altemani AM de AM, Reis F. Disseminated paracoccidioidomycosis with skull and mandible involvement in a heart transplant recipient. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2022;55:e0110. pmid:35674557
  46. 46. Oni T, Unwin N. Why the communicable/non-communicable disease dichotomy is problematic for public health control strategies: implications of multimorbidity for health systems in an era of health transition. Int Health. 2015;ihv040.
  47. 47. Benard G, Duarte AJS. Paracoccidioidomycosis: A Model for Evaluation of the Effects of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection on the Natural History of Endemic Tropical Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:1032–9. pmid:11049788
  48. 48. Falcão EMM, Freitas DFS, Coutinho ZF, Quintella LP, Muniz MDM, Almeida-Paes R, et al. Trends in the Epidemiological and Clinical Profile of Paracoccidioidomycosis in the Endemic Area of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Fungi. 2023;9:946. pmid:37755054
  49. 49. Falcão EM, de Macedo PM, Freitas DFS, d’Avila Freitas A, Grinsztejn B, Veloso VG, et al. Paracoccidioidomycosis in people living with HIV/AIDS: A historical retrospective cohort study in a national reference center for infectious diseases, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16:e0010529. pmid:35704666
  50. 50. Benko LMP, Vieira Da Silva MEDS, Falcão EMM, Freitas DFS, Calvet GA, Almeida MDA, et al. Paracoccidioidomycosis and pregnancy: A 40-year single-center cohort study in the endemic area of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Nosanchuk J, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17:e0011645. pmid:37708219
  51. 51. Peçanha PM, Peçanha-Pietrobom PM, Grão-Velloso TR, Rosa Júnior M, Falqueto A, Gonçalves SS. Paracoccidioidomycosis: What We Know and What Is New in Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. J Fungi. 2022;8:1098. pmid:36294662
  52. 52. Hahn RC, Hagen F, Mendes RP, Burger E, Nery AF, Siqueira NP, et al. Paracoccidioidomycosis: Current Status and Future Trends. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022;35:e00233–21. pmid:36074014
  53. 53. Vidal MSM, Del Negro GMB, Vicentini AP, Svidzinski TIE, Mendes-Giannini MJ, Almeida AMF, et al. Serological Diagnosis of Paracoccidioidomycosis: High Rate of Inter-laboratorial Variability among Medical Mycology Reference Centers. Vinetz JM, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3174. pmid:25211336
  54. 54. Batista J, de Camargo ZP, Fernandes GF, Vicentini AP, Fontes CJF, Hahn RC. Is the geographical origin of a Paracoccidioides brasiliensis isolate important for antigen production for regional diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis? Mycoses. 2010;53:176–80. pmid:19422525
  55. 55. San-Blas G, San-Blas F. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: cell wall structure and virulence. A review. Mycopathologia. 1977;62:77–86. pmid:340954
  56. 56. Zacharias D, Ueda A, Moscardi-Bacchi M, Franco M, San-Blas G. A comparative histopathological, immunological, and biochemical study of experimental intravenous paracoccidioidomycosis induced in mice by three Paracoccidioides brasiliensis isolates. J Med Vet Mycol Bi-Mon Publ Int Soc Hum Anim Mycol. 1986;24:445–54. pmid:3572679
  57. 57. Azuma I, Kanetsuna F, Tanaka Y, Yamamura Y, Carbonell LM. Chemical and immunological properties of galactomannans obtained from Histoplasma duboisii, Histoplasma capsulatum, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and Blasomyces dermatitidis. Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 1974;54:111–25. pmid:4279334
  58. 58. Thompson GR, Le T, Chindamporn A, Kauffman CA, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Ampel NM, et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of the endemic mycoses: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:e364–74. pmid:34364529
  59. 59. Pinheiro BG, Hahn RC, Camargo ZPD, Rodrigues AM. Molecular Tools for Detection and Identification of Paracoccidioides Species: Current Status and Future Perspectives. J Fungi. 2020;6:293. pmid:33217898