https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2892-3053
Figures
Abstract
Background
Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a dermatosis which can occur after successful treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and is a public health problem in VL endemic areas. We conducted a systematic scoping review to assess the characteristics of published PKDL clinical studies, understand the scope of research and explore the feasibility and value of developing a PKDL individual patient data (IPD) platform.
Methods
A systematic review of published literature was conducted to identify PKDL clinical studies by searching the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, WHO Global Index Medicus, PASCAL, Clinicaltrials.gov, Ovid Global Health, Cochrane Database and CENTRAL, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Only prospective studies in humans with PKDL diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up measurements between January 1973 and March 2023 were included. Extracted data includes variables on patient characteristics, treatment regimens, diagnostic methods, geographical locations, efficacy endpoints, adverse events and statistical methodology.
Results
A total of 3,418 records were screened, of which 56 unique studies (n = 2,486 patients) were included in this review. Out of the 56 studies, 36 (64.3%) were from India (1983–2022), 12 (21.4%) from Sudan (1992–2021), 6 (10.7%) were from Bangladesh (1991–2019), and 2 (3.6%) from Nepal (2001–2007). Five (8.9%) studies were published between 1981–1990 (n = 193 patients), 10 (17.9%) between 1991–2000 (n = 230 patients), 10 (17.9%) between 2001–2010 (n = 198 patients), and 31 (55.4%) from 2011 onwards (n = 1,865 patients). Eight (14.3%) were randomised clinical trials, and 48 (85.7%) were non-randomised studies. The median post-treatment follow-up duration was 365 days (range: 90–540 days) in 8 RCTs and 360 days (range: 28–2,373 days) in 48 non-randomised studies. Disease diagnosis was based on clinical criterion in 3 (5.4%) studies, a mixture of clinical and parasitological methods in 47 (83.9%) and was unclear in 6 (10.7%) studies. Major drugs used for treatment were miltefosine (n = 636 patients), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) (n = 508 patients), and antinomy regimens (n = 454 patients). Ten other drug regimens were tested in 270 patients with less than 60 patients per regimen.
Conclusions
Our review identified studies with very limited sample size for the three major drugs (miltefosine, L-AmB, and pentavalent antimony), while the number of patients combined across studies suggest that the IPD platform would be valuable. With the support of relevant stakeholders, the global PKDL community and sufficient financing, a PKDL IPD platform can be realised. This will allow for exploration of different aspects of treatment safety and efficacy, which can potentially guide future healthcare decisions and clinical practices.
Author summary
Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a dermatosis which mostly manifests after successful treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and is characterised by macular, papular, nodular, erythematous, or polymorphic rashes. PKDL is a public health problem in VL endemic areas, as recent infectivity studies show that L. donovani parasites can be found in PKDL lesions and remain infectious to sandfly vectors. There are numerous gaps in our existing knowledge of PKDL, including its pathology, immunology, and risk factors associated with therapeutic outcomes. Currently recommended treatments are either expensive (liposomal amphotericin-B), have raised safety concerns (especially for antimony regimens), or require long treatment duration (e.g. miltefosine). In order to scope the measure of evidence supporting therapeutic efficacy recommendations for PKDL patients, we conducted a systematic literature review. Our systematic review identified 56 PKDL studies describing 2,486 patients, with a majority of the studies (31 studies and 1,865 patients) published from 2010 onwards. The Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO) already have an established data platform for VL, and the IDDO VL data platform currently hosts a critical mass of data from efficacy trials in VL conducted over the past 20 years. Based on the identified volume of data, with a substantial number of studies being relatively recent, we believe that the establishment of a PKDL data platform is feasible. Creating a platform to facilitate the sharing of the datasets would enable in-depth IPD meta-analyses with existing data to address several knowledge gaps of PKDL and guide future research priorities. With the help of relevant stakeholders, the global PKDL community and sufficient resources, a PKDL data platform can be realised and help address key research gaps.
Citation: Singh-Phulgenda S, Kumar R, Dahal P, Munir A, Rashan S, Chhajed R, et al. (2024) Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) drug efficacy study landscape: A systematic scoping review of clinical trials and observational studies to assess the feasibility of establishing an individual participant-level data (IPD) platform. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 18(4): e0011635. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011635
Editor: Ana Laura Grossi de Oliveira, Federal University of Minas Gerais: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, BRAZIL
Received: September 5, 2023; Accepted: March 27, 2024; Published: April 16, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Singh-Phulgenda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data from this systematic review are available in the supplemental files.
Funding: The review was funded by a biomedical resource grant from the BMGF to the Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (Recipient: PJG; Grant Number: INV-004713). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a skin disorder that mostly manifests among patients after successful treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). The disease is characterised by macular, papular, nodular, erythematous, or polymorphic rashes [1–3], and its incidence is estimated to range from 5–10% of treated VL patients in the Indian sub-continent (ISC) to 50% in Sudan [2]. It may also develop in asymptomatic carriers of Leishmania donovani [4]. Furthermore, an estimated 10–23% of diagnosed PKDL cases have no previous history of VL [5].
Geographical differences in clinical and epidemiological characteristics of PKDL cases have been reported [1]. Maculopapular rashes are seen in 90% of the cases in East Africa (EA), whereas macular rash is observed in a large proportion of the cases in the ISC [6]. Most PKDL cases in Sudan self-cure, while treatment is only recommended for chronic (> 6 months) and severe cases [7,8]. On the other hand, treatment is always required for a successful cure of PKDL cases in the ISC [1]. The recommended drug regimens for the treatment of PKDL in India are currently either miltefosine (MF) for 12 weeks or 60–80 doses of amphotericin B deoxycholate (amphotericin B) at 1 mg/kg body weight per day over four months [9]. In EA, treatment is initiated mainly in severe cases with either sodium stibogluconate (SSG) (20 mg/kg/day) for up to 2 months or a 20-day regimen of liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) (2.5 mg/kg/day) [2,10]. However, these treatments are far from ideal in terms of safety, efficacy, adherence, and duration [2,11–13]. More recently, shorter regimens with LAmB used as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs have been evaluated [14,15].
PKDL is a public health problem in VL endemic areas as the PKDL skin lesions contain the parasite and can be an infective reservoir [16,17]. Therefore, prompt detection and treatment of PKDL cases are important for the control and elimination of the disease. Data generated from clinical trials and longitudinal studies serve as the backbone for evidence-based case management and help identify knowledge gaps to guide future research. Existing systematic reviews on efficacy studies of PKDL have so far focused on a limited set of therapeutic options [18], and to date, there has been no comprehensive systematic review to assess the landscape of prospective PKDL clinical studies aimed at describing drug efficacy. Poverty-related neglected tropical diseases such as VL and PKDL have historically received little research and development investment [15]. Consequently, these diseases which often impact people experiencing poverty are characterised by fewer studies, a smaller number of patients, and the small volume of generated data can remain in silos. The scarce data from completed PKDL studies remains an underutilised source of information that can help answer specific research priorities and identify knowledge gaps.
This systematic review aimed to systematically identify PKDL treatment efficacy studies in the literature and evaluate the feasibility of establishing a global PKDL individual patient data (IPD) platform. The specific objectives were:
- To identify PKDL treatment efficacy studies (clinical trials and observational) and summarise the study characteristics.
- To assess the technical feasibility of developing a global IPD database for PKDL, i.e., how much of the IPD are likely to be retrieved from the studies identified in this review.
Material and methods
Protocol and registration
The protocol for this scoping review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021295848) and was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic-Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines [19]. PRISMA-ScR checklist is attached as S1 File.
Information sources and search strategy
A systematic scoping review of published literature was first conducted on 2nd June 2020 and updated in full on 3rd March 2023 by an expert librarian (EH) to identify PKDL efficacy studies by searching the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, WHO Global Index Medicus, PASCAL, Clinicaltrials.gov, Ovid Global Health, Cochrane Database, and CENTRAL, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). The database search used the query, “((Post-Kala-azar Dermal) OR pkdl)” which was kept broad to capture all relevant studies. Only prospective human studies with PKDL diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up measurements between 1973 and March 2023 were included. The search was not restricted by language of publication. The details of the search strategy used, and the time period of the search are presented in S2 File.
Eligibility criteria and study selection
Studies in this review were screened in two stages, namely title and abstract screening and full-text screening, according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All clinical trials and prospective observational studies, in which patients were treated for PKDL and followed-up, were eligible for inclusion. The inclusion of studies was not restricted by the age of patients, the drug regimen used as an intervention, the comparator used, the length of post-treatment follow-up, or treatment outcome to be able to include all relevant studies. The following formed part of the exclusion set: studies published as case-reports, case-series, retrospective studies, diagnostic or prognostic studies, cross-sectional studies, letters, and studies that included the wrong population (non-PKDL, non-human), were published before the year 1973, had duplicate records, and publications with full-texts not retrievable. See the PROSPERO registration (CRD42021295848) for complete eligibility criteria. All the articles were independently screened by two reviewers (AM, RK, SR, and SSP) in a blinded fashion using Covidence Systematic Review Software (RRID: SCR_016484; December 2022) [20]. Any disagreement was resolved through consensus with a third reviewer.
Data extraction
Variable and data dictionaries with extraction rules were developed for constructing a REDCap (RRID: SCR_003445) electronic data capture tool [21,22]. From each of the articles deemed eligible for inclusion, the following variables were extracted: study title, publication year, country, study design, patient characteristics (age, gender), inclusion and exclusion criteria, diagnostic methods, treatment regimens, follow-up, efficacy endpoints, adverse events, and statistical methodology. The detailed metadata for the database is provided in S3 File. The REDCap extraction tool was piloted on 10% of eligible studies by two authors (CN, RK) to validate the database and extraction rules. Two authors (AM, RK) each extracted data from half of the eligible studies and cross-verified each other’s extraction. Extracted data from ten percent of the randomly selected article was verified by two additional authors (RC, SSP). Any discordances in data extraction were discussed for clarity and consistency with a third reviewer (PD, SSP) and resolved through consensus.
Data analysis and reporting
Descriptive characteristics of the included studies were presented. Details of patient characteristics were reported, and the details of the treatment regimen administrated, including dosage and duration of treatment, were summarised. Descriptive analysis was carried out using R software (R Project for Statistical Computing; RRID: SCR_001905).
Risk of bias assessment
The primary aim of this study was to systematically scope the literature on PKDL studies to gauge whether the establishment of a PKDL IPD platform is feasible. Meta-analysis of study results was not intended, and no specific clinical research questions were posed. Therefore, the results from this review are limited to a descriptive analysis of study and patient characteristics of identified literature, and risk of bias assessment is therefore not conducted.
Results
Search outcomes
The review identified a total of 3,418 records across the literature databases searched. After excluding 22 duplicate records, a total of 977 records were eligible for title and abstract screening. Of the latter, 514 records did not meet the eligibility criteria, leaving 441 records for full-text screening. After reviewing the full texts, 66 studies were considered eligible for inclusion in this review. Ten of the 66 studies are currently ongoing and remain unpublished, leading to a total of 56 unique studies describing 2,486 patients included in this review (Fig 1). One additional study was published after the literature search cut-off date of this review and another study is completed and awaiting publication. The identified studies are reported in Tables 1, 2 and 3.
Legend: WHO ICTRP = World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. A separate search was carried out on WHO ICTRP as the server was unavailable during the time when other databases were searched.
Publications by region and time-period
Of the 56 included studies, 36 (64.3%) were from India (1983–2022), 12 (21.4%) from Sudan (1992–2021), 6 (10.7%) were from Bangladesh (1991–2019), and 2 (3.6%) from Nepal (2001–2007) (Fig 2). Overall, these studies enrolled 2,486 patients, of which 1,512 (60.8%) were from India, 662 (26.6%) were from Bangladesh, 265 (10.7%) were from Sudan, and 47 (1.9%) were from Nepal. There were no studies identified between 1973–1980, 5 (8.9%) studies were published between 1981–1990 (n = 193 patients), 10 (17.9%) between 1991–2000 (n = 230 patients), 10 (17.9%) between 2001–2010 (n = 198 patients), and 31 (55.4%) from 2011 onwards (n = 1,865 patients) (Fig 2).
Study design
Of the 56 studies included, 8 (14.3%) were randomised studies (1987–2021) and the remaining 48 (85.7%) were non-randomised studies (Fig 2). Of the 8 RCTs (n = 386 patients), 1 was an open label trial, 1 was single blinded and blinding was not stated in the remaining 6 trials. The median number of patients recruited per study across 8 RCTs and 48 non-randomised studies were 33 (range 10–108) and 26 (range 2–280), respectively. The median post-treatment follow-up duration was 365 days (range: 90–540 days) in 8 RCTs and 360 days (range: 28–2,373 days) in 48 non-randomised trials (Tables 1 and 2).
Patient characteristics
Overall, patients of all age ranges were enrolled in 28 (50.0%) studies, only adults (15+ years) were enrolled in 4 (7.1%) studies; and the age range of the patients included was not clear in the remaining 24 (42.9%) studies. The age-range of the patients included in the studies is depicted in Fig 3, for the 32 studies on which the age range data was presented. The gender distribution of the study population by study type is presented in Fig 3. Of the 2,486 patients enrolled, 1,270 were males, 650 were females and gender were not stated for the remaining 566 patients. The median proportion of males enrolled was 73.7% [range: 4.4%-100%] in 48 observational studies and 70.3% [range: 48.0% -90.0%] in 8 RCTs. None of the studies explicitly reported enrolling PKDL patients with HIV, pregnancy, para kala-azar, or any other comorbidities and it was unclear if they were excluded. Previous treatment for VL was clearly confirmed in 203 (52.6%) of the 386 patients enrolled in 8 RCTs and 936 (44.6%) of the 2,100 patients enrolled in 48 non-randomised studies.
Legend: The vertical dotted line presents age of 5, 10, and 15 years respectively. Each row represents a single study.
Diagnostic methods
Only clinical criterion was adopted as a diagnostic method for disease identification in 3 (5.4%) nonrandomised studies, a mixture of clinical and parasitological demonstration in 48 (83.9%) studies on the whole, and the diagnostic method was unclear in 7 (10.7%) nonrandomised studies (Table 4). Overall, 43 (76.8%) studies used one or more laboratory tests for confirmed PKDL diagnosis in addition to clinical presentations (Table 4). All randomised clinical trials used one or more confirmatory tests for PKDL diagnosis. Microscopic demonstration of amastigotes in skin biopsies (slit or snip skin smears) in addition to other methods (clinical, serological, PCR, or culture) was used in 37 (66.1%) studies. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used in 20 (35.7%) studies, while serological test was used in 27 (48.2%). A further breakdown of the diagnostic methods used over time-period is presented in Fig 4.
Legend: The number of studies is non-unique as a single study can contribute to multiple categories. See Table 4 for different combination of diagnostics methods adopted.
Drug regimens
Thirteen different treatment regimens were adopted across 82 treatment arms. Details of treatment regimens at study arm levels were available for only 1,876 patients and it was missing for the remaining 610 patients. The most widely used drug regimen was miltefosine which was administered to 636 (33.9%, 636/1,876) patients followed by liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) (n = 508/1,876, 27.1%), sodium stibogluconate (n = 268/1,876, 14.3%), sodium antimony gluconate (n = 186/1,876, 9.9%) and 10 other drug regimens, all them enrolling less than 60 patients (Table 5; Fig 5).
SAG = sodium antimony gluconate; SSG = Sodium stibogluconate; L-AmB = Liposomal Amphotericin B; AMBd = Amphotericin B deoxycholate.
Six different drugs were tested in three combination therapies: liposomal amphotericin B + miltefosine (n = 16/1,876, 0.9%), terbinafine + itraconazole (n = 9/1,876, 0.5%), and sodium antimony gluconate + ketoconazole (n = 5/1,876, 0.3%). Vaccine as a therapy was tested among 54 (2.9%) PKDL patients in two studies from Sudan. ‘No treatment’ as a natural healing effect was used as a comparator arm, including 8 (0.4%) PKDL patients in one study.
There was variation in daily mg/kg dose and overall treatment duration within the same regimen (Fig 6). L-AmB was tested at a total dose of 15 mg/kg over 3 weeks in 1 study (n = 280 patients), 30 mg/kg over 3 weeks in 3 studies (n = 118 patients) and a total dose of 50 mg/kg in 1 study (n = 12 patients). Miltefosine was tested at 100 mg/day for 3 months in 4 studies (n = 176 patients) with dosage ranging from 100–150 mg/day over 2–4 months period, while the daily target dose of antimony regimens ranged from 10–20 mg/kg/day over 1 to 4 months period (Fig 6).
SAG = sodium antimony gluconate; SSG = Sodium stibogluconate; L-AmB = Liposomal Amphotericin B.
Assessment of cure in RCTs (n = 8 studies)
Three RCTs clearly defined the initial cure criteria used; all these included disappearance/clearance or regression of lesions at the end of the therapy while the remaining 5 studies didn’t explicitly state the criterion for initial cure (Table 1). Final cure (or cure) was defined as complete disappearance of the lesions in 1 study, complete disappearance of the lesions along with parasite score of 0 in 4 studies, as absence of relapse in 1 study, and the definition was not clear in the remaining 2 studies (Table 1). Details regarding the proportion of patients who achieved initial and final cure are presented in Table 1, when reported.
Assessment of cure in non-randomised studies (n = 48 studies)
Of the 48 non-randomised studies, only 3 (6.3%) studies clearly defined initial cure (as clinical improvement by days 30 and/or 90 from treatment onset) and 19 (39.6%) studies clearly defined the criteria used for assessment of the final cure (Table 2). All 19 studies required complete or partial regression/healing of lesions for achieving cure with 5 studies explicitly requiring complete healing of lesions and 2 studies additionally requiring negative (or negligible) parasitaemia using PCR (Table 2).
Reporting of safety data (n = 56 studies)
Adverse treatment outcomes were reported in all 8 RCTs. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA, was used in 3 RCTs and the AE methodology, criteria and terminology was not clear in 5 RCTs. Of the 48 non-randomised studies, CTC-AE was used in 5 studies and not reported in the remaining 43 studies.
Discussion
This review identified 56 studies (2,486 patients) published in the past 50 years describing the efficacy of drug regimens adopted for treatment of PKDL. Of these, only 8 studies representing 15% of the enrolled PKDL patients were from randomised clinical trials. Despite the fact that PKDL is a potential reservoir of infection [16,23] with more than 700 to 2,322 cases reported annually (2014–2021) [23], identification of only 8 RCTs studies suggests a relatively limited evidence base supporting treatment recommendations. This review also identified that there were a limited number of studies among children (in studies that reported patients’ age-range) with an evident male preponderance (male: female ~ 2:1) among enrolled patients; this is consistent with published literature on PKDL and VL [24–26]. None of the 56 studies included in this review enrolled pregnant or lactating women. In general, PKDL in pregnancy has been described only in sporadic case reports in the literature [27]. Similar observations were found for the treatment of VL in pregnancy [28]. Finally, none of the studies identified enrolled patients with HIV or other comorbidities. Although these comorbidities are commonly reported in visceral leishmaniasis [29,30], these conditions have been less pronounced with PKDL, and only sporadic cases have been reported across India, Africa, Europe, and South America [31–33]. Overall, these observations regarding the patient spectrum show substantial knowledge gaps in treatment efficacy in these specific subpopulations.
Of the 48 observational studies, three (125 patients) studies did not require any confirmatory tests for the PKDL diagnosis. All the RCTs used one or more laboratory tests for the PKDL diagnosis. Serological tests (antibody detection) were used in six studies involving 471 patients, although such tests are not deemed adequately reliable in this context as there can be substantial false-positive test results due to past VL infection and antibody cross-reactivity [34]. Serological tests started to be adopted for diagnosis after the 1990s and have continued to be implemented in PKDL studies, particularly, in combination with microscopy and clinical criterion. The rK39 rapid immunochromatographic test was the most common serological test used while enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the direct agglutination test were also reported. Microscopic demonstration of amastigotes in skin biopsies (slit or snip skin smears) was adopted throughout the time-period included in this review. In 20 of the 31 studies published after 2010, PCR method has been used, particularly in combination with microscopy. However, the choice of PCR types (nested, quantitative, etc.) and target genes (ITS-1, K-39) varied substantially across studies.
Following enrolment of patients in 82 arms across 56 studies, 13 different drugs were used for treatment with more than 85% of the patients treated with three major drugs: liposomal amphotericin B, miltefosine, and pentavalent antimony. However, even for these major drugs, there was a wide variation in daily mg/kg dose and overall treatment duration. The adoption of drug regimens was also highly regional. Miltefosine and L-AmB were adopted in the Indian subcontinent, whereas pentavalent antimony was the major drug used in Sudan. Following the completion of the treatment regimen, there was also variation in the time-point of assessment of cured proportion, including differences in criterion used for defining cure. In general, the most common definition of initial cure was parasitological clearance after treatment completion with or without clinical resolution of lesions at the planned end of the completion of the treatment regimen. Similarly, complete resolution of lesions with parasitological clearance at the time of final assessment (actual time-point of evaluation varied) was the most common definition of final cure.
Overall, this review has characterised the variation in different aspects of study design, conduct, analysis, and reporting. For example, the outcome definitions adopted for efficacy assessments were presented in only a third of the studies, the age-range of the patients included was not reported in 43% of the studies while the diagnostic method for disease confirmation was unclear in 11% of the studies. This heterogeneity acted as a limitation to perform a direct comparison of results across the studies using the published aggregated data. Similarly, criteria used for gradation of the severity of safety outcomes were not reported in the majority of the studies included; an observation consistent with the VL literature [35]. Taken together, this warrants harmonisation of the definitions and protocols adopted across future studies for facilitating robust reporting of the efficacy and safety studies of PKDL. Besides, a scope for harmonisation of these aspects in the existing data can be exercised through IPD data platform.
Similarly, the median sample size recruited across 8 RCTs and 48 non-randomised studies were 33 (range 10–108) and 26 (range 2–289), respectively. This suggests that existing practice on the patient treatment of PKDL relies on evidence from relatively small studies. Such small study size including wide variations in the regimens adopted across the studies limits the possibility of robust assessment of efficacy and to identify determinants of poor treatment outcomes in any single study. Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses are a proven methodological approach to address some of the limitations of classical aggregated meta-analyses [36–38]. A harmonised repository of raw data from the studies identified in this review can facilitate IPD meta-analyses to generate new evidence regarding the efficacy of existing medicines in sub-groups of patient population. Understanding the existing volume of data was a crucial first step towards determining the feasibility of establishing an IPD data repository for PKDL. First, over half of the studies on PKDL were published in the last decade. The data from these recent studies are more likely to be retrievable than the older studies. Second, the identified volume of existing data on miltefosine and liposomal amphotericin B in the trials (>500 patients in total) (these new regimens were mostly tested in studies after 2000) suggests that creating an IPD platform for these two important drug regimens would be valuable. For studies investigating treatment regimens with fewer numbers of enrolled patients, such as paromomycin, assembling the raw IPD across multiple studies could help to provide further information on these regimens. Finally, a new large study has been published since the completion of this review [39], which can be incorporated in the future update of this systematic review.
The Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO) has an established experience in the development of an IPD repository for VL and other infectious diseases, including but not limited to malaria [WWARN], Ebola Virus Disease and COVID-19. These IDDO repositories have facilitated large scale IPD meta-analyses exploring the determinants of therapeutic efficacies [40–42]. To maximise interoperability and reusability of data, IDDO has adopted the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) compliant data standards [43]. As an important step towards the development of a PKDL data platform, the IDDO VL data platform already hosts a critical mass of data from efficacy trials in VL conducted over the past 20 years and hence has the technical and infrastructural framework to support the development of a PKDL data platform. Based on the identified volume of data with a substantial number of studies being relatively recent, and initial sharing of datasets from some key PKDL studies to the IDDO VL data platform suggests that establishment of a PKDL data platform is feasible. Such a platform can facilitate collaborative research to answer questions of public health relevance and maximise the usefulness of existing data and promote data re-use. The unique resource that would be created by a harmonised database of IPD from the identified studies would allow us to answer issues of public health concern that could not be answered through standalone trials or aggregated published data.
Conclusions
An IPD platform would have enough data on the three main medications (miltefosine, L-AmB, and pentavalent antimony) if the number of patients from nonrandomised studies were pooled, despite the fact that this review found insufficient patient volume across randomised clinical trials. With the help of relevant stakeholders, the global PKDL community, and sufficient financing, a PKDL IPD platform can be realised. This will allow a nuanced exploration of the safety and efficacy of PKDL drugs which can potentially guide future clinical practices.
References
- 1. Zijlstra EE, Musa AM, Khalil EA, el-Hassan IM, el-Hassan AM: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Lancet Infect Dis 2003, 3:87–98. pmid:12560194
- 2. Sundar S, Chakravarty J: An update on pharmacotherapy for leishmaniasis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015, 16:237–252. pmid:25346016
- 3. Kumar P, Chatterjee M, Das NK: Post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis: Clinical Features and Differential Diagnosis. Indian J Dermatol 2021, 66:24–33. pmid:33911290
- 4. Saha P, Ganguly S, Chatterjee M, Das SB, Kundu PK, Guha SK, Ghosh TK, Bera DK, Basu N, Maji AK: Asymptomatic leishmaniasis in kala-azar endemic areas of Malda district, West Bengal, India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017, 11:e0005391. pmid:28187202
- 5. Zijlstra EE, Alves F, Rijal S, Arana B, Alvar J: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent: A threat to the South-East Asia Region Kala-azar Elimination Programme. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017, 11:e0005877. pmid:29145397
- 6. National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme: The Accelerated plan for Kala-azar elimination in 2017. New Delhi, India.
- 7. Musa AM, Khalil EA, Raheem MA, Zijlstra EE, Ibrahim ME, Elhassan IM, Mukhtar MM, El Hassan AM: The natural history of Sudanese post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: clinical, immunological and prognostic features. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2002, 96:765–772. pmid:12625930
- 8. Zijlstra E, El-Hassan A: Leishmaniasis in Sudan. 4. Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2001, 95:S59–S76.
- 9.
National Centre for Vector Borne Disease Control India: Guidelines for treatment of Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (based on WHO Technical Report Series 949). New Delhi.; https://nvbdcp.gov.in/WriteReadData/l892s/PKDL-Guidelines-220512.pdf.
- 10. Saurabh S, Mahabir M: Adverse ocular events on miltefosine treatment for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in India. Trop Doct 2020, 50:37–42. pmid:31610724
- 11. Pijpers J, den Boer ML, Essink DR, Ritmeijer K: The safety and efficacy of miltefosine in the long-term treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in South Asia—A review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019, 13:e0007173. pmid:30742620
- 12. Musa AM, Khalil EA, Mahgoub FA, Hamad S, Elkadaru AM, El Hassan AM: Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in the treatment of persistent post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2005, 99:563–569. pmid:16156969
- 13. den Boer M, Das AK, Akhter F, Burza S, Ramesh V, Ahmed BN, Zijlstra EE, Ritmeijer K: Safety and Effectiveness of Short-Course AmBisome in the Treatment of Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis: A Prospective Cohort Study in Bangladesh. Clin Infect Dis 2018, 67:667–675. pmid:29554244
- 14.
Short Course Regimens for Treatment of PKDL (Sudan). [https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03399955]
- 15. Pedrique B, Strub-Wourgaft N, Some C, Olliaro P, Trouiller P, Ford N, Pecoul B, Bradol JH: The drug and vaccine landscape for neglected diseases (2000–11): a systematic assessment. Lancet Glob Health 2013, 1:e371–379. pmid:25104602
- 16. Mondal D, Bern C, Ghosh D, Rashid M, Molina R, Chowdhury R, Nath R, Ghosh P, Chapman LAC, Alim A, et al: Quantifying the Infectiousness of Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis Toward Sand Flies. Clin Infect Dis 2019, 69:251–258. pmid:30357373
- 17. Singh OP, Tiwary P, Kushwaha AK, Singh SK, Singh DK, Lawyer P, Rowton E, Chaubey R, Singh AK, Rai TK, et al: Xenodiagnosis to evaluate the infectiousness of humans to sandflies in an area endemic for visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar, India: a transmission-dynamics study. Lancet Microbe 2021, 2:e23–e31. pmid:33615281
- 18. Datta A, Podder I, Das A, Sil A, Das NK: Therapeutic Modalities in Post Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Safety of the Treatment Options. Indian J Dermatol 2021, 66:34–43. pmid:33911291
- 19. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, et al: PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018, 169:467–473. pmid:30178033
- 20.
Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available from www.covidence.org.
- 21. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009, 42:377–381. pmid:18929686
- 22. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, et al: The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019, 95:103208. pmid:31078660
- 23. Mondiale de la Santé O, World Health Organization: Global leishmaniasis surveillance: 2021, assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic–Surveillance mondiale de la leishmaniose: 2021, évaluation de l’impact de la pandémie de COVID-19. Weekly Epidemiological Record = Relevé épidémiologique hebdomadaire 2022, 97:575–590.
- 24. Mukhopadhyay D, Mukherjee S, Ghosh S, Roy S, Saha B, Das NK, Chatterjee M: A male preponderance in patients with Indian post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis is associated with increased circulating levels of testosterone. Int J Dermatol 2016, 55:e250–255. pmid:26536363
- 25. Cloots K, Burza S, Malaviya P, Hasker E, Kansal S, Mollett G, Chakravarty J, Roy N, Lal BK, Rijal S, et al: Male predominance in reported Visceral Leishmaniasis cases: Nature or nurture? A comparison of population-based with health facility-reported data. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020, 14:e0007995. pmid:31995564
- 26. Dahal P, Singh-Phulgenda S, Olliaro PL, Guerin PJ: Gender disparity in cases enrolled in clinical trials of visceral leishmaniasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021, 15:e0009204. pmid:33725005
- 27. Verma P, Grover C, Sharma S: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in pregnancy: hitherto unaccounted. International Journal of Dermatology 2014, 53:1501–1504. pmid:24738750
- 28. Dahal P, Singh-Phulgenda S, Maguire BJ, Harriss E, Ritmeijer K, Alves F, Guerin PJ, Olliaro PL: Visceral Leishmaniasis in pregnancy and vertical transmission: A systematic literature review on the therapeutic orphans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021, 15:e0009650. pmid:34375339
- 29. Burza S, Mahajan R, Kazmi S, Alexander N, Kumar D, Kumar V, Lasry E, Harshana A, de Lima Pereira A, Das P: AmBisome Monotherapy and Combination AmBisome–Miltefosine Therapy for the Treatment of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Patients Coinfected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in India: A Randomized Open-Label, Parallel-Arm, Phase 3 Trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2022, 75:1423–1432. pmid:35147680
- 30. Li X-X, Zhou X-N: Co-infection of tuberculosis and parasitic diseases in humans: a systematic review. Parasites & vectors 2013, 6:1–12. pmid:23522098
- 31. Organization WH: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: a manual for case management and control: report of a WHO consultative meeting, Kolkata, India, 2–3 July 2012. 2013.
- 32. Das V, Pandey K, Verma N, Bimal S, Lal C, Singh D, Das P: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL), HIV and pulmonary tuberculosis. The National medical journal of India 2010, 23. pmid:20925205
- 33. Zijlstra EE: PKDL and other dermal lesions in HIV co-infected patients with leishmaniasis: review of clinical presentation in relation to immune responses. PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2014, 8:e3258. pmid:25412435
- 34. Topno RK, Madhukar M, Pandey K, Kumar R, Rabidas VN, Kumar M, Agrawal K, Verma N, Yadav DP, Bimal S: False positivity of rK39 test in five chronic myeloid leukemia cases from Bihar, India: a possible challenge to leishmaniasis diagnosis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020, 103:2257. pmid:32975180
- 35. Singh-Phulgenda S, Dahal P, Ngu R, Maguire BJ, Hawryszkiewycz A, Rashan S, Brack M, Halleux CM, Alves F, Stepniewska K, et al: Serious adverse events following treatment of visceral leishmaniasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021, 15:e0009302. pmid:33780461
- 36. Stewart LA, Parmar MK: Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? The Lancet 1993, 341:418–422. pmid:8094183
- 37. Tierney JF, Vale C, Riley R, Smith CT, Stewart L, Clarke M, Rovers M: Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: guidance on their use. PLoS medicine 2015, 12:e1001855. pmid:26196287
- 38. Huang Y, Tang J, Wai-san Tam W, Mao C, Yuan J, Di M, Yang Z: Comparing the overall result and interaction in aggregate data meta-analysis and individual patient data meta-analysis. Medicine 2016, 95. pmid:27057906
- 39. Sundar S, Singh J, Dinkar A, Agrawal N: Safety and Effectiveness of Miltefosine in Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis: An Observational Study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023, 10:ofad231. pmid:37234513
- 40. Group WAbCTABS, Dahal P, d’Alessandro U, Dorsey G, Guerin PJ, Nsanzabana C, Price RN, Sibley CH, Stepniewska K, Talisuna AO: Clinical determinants of early parasitological response to ACTs in African patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria: a literature review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. BMC Med 2015, 13:212.
- 41. WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network ASAQSG, Adjuik MA, Allan R, Anvikar AR, Ashley EA, Ba MS, Barennes H, Barnes KI, Bassat Q, Baudin E, et al: The effect of dosing strategies on the therapeutic efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine for uncomplicated malaria: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. BMC Med 2015, 13:66. pmid:25888957
- 42. WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network DPSG: The effect of dosing regimens on the antimalarial efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. PLoS Med 2013, 10:e1001564; discussion e1001564.
- 43.
CDISC compliant case report forms for uncomplicated VL and VL-HIV co-infection: A unique collaborative effort by VL experts and a first in NTDs [https://www.iddo.org/news/cdisc-compliant-case-report-forms-uncomplicated-vl-and-vl-hiv-co-infection-unique] [24 August 2023]
- 44. Thakur CP, Narain S, Kumar N, Hassan SM, Jha DK, Kumar A: Amphotericin B is superior to sodium antimony gluconate in the treatment of Indian post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1997, 91:611–616. pmid:9425363
- 45. Pandey K, Pal B, Siddiqui NA, Lal CS, Ali V, Bimal S, Kumar A, Verma N, Das VNR, Singh SK, et al: A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) versus miltefosine in patients with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021, 87:34–41. pmid:33580944
- 46. Musa AM, Khalil EA, Mahgoub FA, Elgawi SH, Modabber F, Elkadaru AE, Aboud MH, Noazin S, Ghalib HW, El-Hassan AM, Leishmaniasis Research GS: Immunochemotherapy of persistent post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: a novel approach to treatment. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2008, 102:58–63. pmid:17963805
- 47. Pandey K, Pal B, Das VNR, Murti K, Lal CS, Verma N, Bimal S, Ali V, Verma RB, Topno RK, et al: Safety and efficacy of a combination of paromomycin and miltefosine for two vs. three courses in patients with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: an observational pilot study. Br J Dermatol 2017, 177:557–559. pmid:27781268
- 48. Sundar S, Sinha P, Jha TK, Chakravarty J, Rai M, Kumar N, Pandey K, Narain MK, Verma N, Das VN, et al: Oral miltefosine for Indian post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: a randomised trial. Trop Med Int Health 2013, 18:96–100. pmid:23136856
- 49. Thakur CP, Kumar K, Sinha PK, Mishra BN, Pandey AK: Treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis with sodium stibogluconate. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987, 295:886–887. pmid:2823955
- 50. Rathi S, Pandhi R, Khanna N, Chopra P: Therapeutic trial of sodium antimony gluconate alone and in combination with ketoconazole in post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003, 69.
- 51. Rabi Das VN, Siddiqui NA, Pal B, Lal CS, Verma N, Kumar A, Verma RB, Kumar D, Das P, Pandey K: To evaluate efficacy and safety of amphotericin B in two different doses in the treatment of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). PLoS One 2017, 12:e0174497. pmid:28355259
- 52. Nandy A, Neogy A, Ghosh Dastidar B, Sarkar M, Mallick K, Chowdhury A: Immune response and drug response in kala-azar and Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. In Proceedings of the Indo-UK workshop1983: 161–170.
- 53. Moulik S, Sengupta R, Ghosh MK, Das NK, Saha B, Chatterjee M: Liposomal amphotericin B is more effective in polymorphic lesions of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2022, 88:201–206. pmid:33969651
- 54. Younis BM, Osman M, Khalil EAG, Santoro F, Furini S, Wiggins R, Keding A, Carraro M, Musa AEA, Abdarahaman MAA, et al: Safety and immunogenicity of ChAd63-KH vaccine in post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis patients in Sudan. Mol Ther 2021, 29:2366–2377. pmid:33781913
- 55. Khalil EA, Nur NM, Zijlstra EE, El-Hassan AM, Davidson RN: Failure of a combination of two antifungal drugs, terbinafine plus itraconazole, in Sudanese post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1996, 90:187–188. pmid:8761586
- 56. Ganguly S, Mukhopadhyay D, Das NK, Chaduvula M, Sadhu S, Chatterjee U, Rahman M, Goswami RP, Guha SK, Modak D, et al: Enhanced lesional Foxp3 expression and peripheral anergic lymphocytes indicate a role for regulatory T cells in Indian post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. J Invest Dermatol 2010, 130:1013–1022. pmid:20032994
- 57. Islam S, Kenah E, Bhuiyan MA, Rahman KM, Goodhew B, Ghalib CM, Zahid MM, Ozaki M, Rahman MW, Haque R, et al: Clinical and immunological aspects of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2013, 89:345–353. pmid:23817330
- 58. Neogy AB, Nandy A, Ghosh Dastidar B, Chowdhury AB: Modulation of the cell-mediated immune response in kala-azar and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in relation to chemotherapy. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1988, 82:27–34. pmid:2840867
- 59. Mukherjee S, Mukhopadhyay D, Braun C, Barbhuiya JN, Das NK, Chatterjee U, von Stebut E, Chatterjee M: Decreased presence of Langerhans cells is a critical determinant for Indian Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Exp Dermatol 2015, 24:232–234. pmid:25580856
- 60. Mukherjee S, Sengupta R, Mukhopadhyay D, Braun C, Mitra S, Roy S, Kanti Das N, Chatterjee U, von Stebut E, Chatterjee M: Impaired activation of lesional CD8(+) T-cells is associated with enhanced expression of Programmed Death-1 in Indian Post Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. Sci Rep 2019, 9:762. pmid:30679687
- 61. Bhandari V, Kulshrestha A, Deep DK, Stark O, Prajapati VK, Ramesh V, Sundar S, Schonian G, Dujardin JC, Salotra P: Drug susceptibility in Leishmania isolates following miltefosine treatment in cases of visceral leishmaniasis and post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012, 6:e1657. pmid:22629478
- 62. Neogy AB, Nandy A, Chowdhury AB: Leishmanin test in post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1990, 84:58. pmid:2345927
- 63. el Hassan AM, Ghalib HW, Zijlstra EE, Eltoum IA, Satti M, Ali MS, Ali HM: Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in the Sudan: clinical features, pathology and treatment. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1992, 86:245–248. pmid:1329273
- 64. Das ML, Deb M, Karki BM, Sarif M, Khanal B, Bhattacharya SK, Agrawal S, Koirala S: Use of rK39 for diagnosis of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in Nepal. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2007, 38:619–625. pmid:17882997
- 65. Katara GK, Ansari NA, Verma S, Ramesh V, Salotra P: Foxp3 and IL-10 expression correlates with parasite burden in lesional tissues of post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011, 5:e1171. pmid:21655313
- 66. Basher A, Rashid MM, Habibullah AM, Nath R, Akter D, Chowdhury IH, Azim A, Nath P, Faiz MA: Miltefosine Induced Reduced Male Fertility Capacity after Treatment of Post Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis, Bangladesh. Mymensingh Med J 2019, 28:328–332. pmid:31086147
- 67. Ganguly S, Saha P, Chatterjee M, Roy S, Ghosh TK, Guha SK, Kundu PK, Bera DK, Basu N, Maji AK: PKDL—A Silent Parasite Pool for Transmission of Leishmaniasis in Kala-azar Endemic Areas of Malda District, West Bengal, India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015, 9:e0004138. pmid:26485704
- 68. Hossain F, Ghosh P, Khan MAA, Duthie MS, Vallur AC, Picone A, Howard RF, Reed SG, Mondal D: Real-time PCR in detection and quantitation of Leishmania donovani for the diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis patients and the monitoring of their response to treatment. PLoS One 2017, 12:e0185606. pmid:28957391
- 69. Zijlstra EE, Siddig Ali M, el-Hassan AM, Hofland HW, el-Toum I, Satti M, Ghalib HW: The treatment of kala-azar in the Sudan with sodium stibogluconate: a randomized trial of three dosage regimens. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1993, 87:307–309. pmid:8236402
- 70. Modak D, Basu A, Bhattacharya R, Pramanik N, Baribhula J, Guha S: Miltefosine in post-kala-azar dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL). J Indian Acad Clin Med 2010, 11:199–203.
- 71. Ghosh P, Hasnain MG, Hossain F, Khan MAA, Chowdhury R, Faisal K, Mural MA, Baker J, Nath R, Ghosh D, et al: Evaluation of Real-time PCR for Diagnosis of Post-Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis in Endemic Foci of Bangladesh. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018, 5:ofy234. pmid:30320150
- 72. Khalil EA, Zijlstra EE, Kager PA, El Hassan AM: Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of Leishmania donovani infection in two villages in an endemic area in eastern Sudan. Trop Med Int Health 2002, 7:35–44. pmid:11851953
- 73. Ramesh V, Singh R, Avishek K, Verma A, Deep DK, Verma S, Salotra P: Decline in Clinical Efficacy of Oral Miltefosine in Treatment of Post Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL) in India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015, 9:e0004093. pmid:26492039
- 74. Das S, Sardar AH, Abhishek K, Kumar A, Rabidas VN, Das P: Cathelicidin augments VDR-dependent anti-leishmanial immune response in Indian Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. Int Immunopharmacol 2017, 50:130–138. pmid:28662432
- 75. Mukherjee S, Mukhopadhyay D, Ghosh S, Barbhuiya JN, Das NK, Chatterjee M: Decreased Frequency and Secretion of CD26 Promotes Disease Progression in Indian Post Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. J Clin Immunol 2016, 36:85–94. pmid:26644312
- 76. Jaiswal P, Datta S, Sardar B, Chaudhuri SJ, Maji D, Ghosh M, Saha B, Mukhopadhyay S: Glycoproteins in circulating immune complexes are biomarkers of patients with Indian PKDL: A study from endemic districts of West Bengal, India. PLoS One 2018, 13:e0192302. pmid:29420575
- 77. Zijlstra EE, el-Hassan AM, Ismael A: Endemic kala-azar in eastern Sudan: post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995, 52:299–305. pmid:7741164
- 78. Sundar S, Singh A, Tiwari A, Shukla S, Chakravarty J, Rai M: Efficacy and Safety of Paromomycin in Treatment of Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. ISRN Parasitol 2014, 2014:548010. pmid:27398387
- 79. Sundar S, Singh A, Chakravarty J, Rai M: Efficacy and safety of miltefosine in treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. ScientificWorldJournal 2015, 2015:414378. pmid:25685839
- 80. Ghosh S, Das NK, Mukherjee S, Mukhopadhyay D, Barbhuiya JN, Hazra A, Chatterjee M: Inadequacy of 12-Week Miltefosine Treatment for Indian Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015, 93:767–769. pmid:26175030
- 81. Garg VK, Agrawal S, Rani S, Joshi A, Agarwalla A, Das ML, Koirala S: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in Nepal. Int J Dermatol 2001, 40:179–184. pmid:11422520
- 82. Ramesh V, Misra RS, Saxena U, Mukherjee A: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: a clinical and therapeutic study. Int J Dermatol 1993, 32:272–275. pmid:8387467
- 83. Ganguly S, Das NK, Panja M, Pal S, Modak D, Rahaman M, Mallik S, Guha SK, Pramanik N, Goswami R, et al: Increased levels of interleukin-10 and IgG3 are hallmarks of Indian post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis 2008, 197:1762–1771. pmid:18444882
- 84. Verma S, Bhandari V, Avishek K, Ramesh V, Salotra P: Reliable diagnosis of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) using slit aspirate specimen to avoid invasive sampling procedures. Trop Med Int Health 2013, 18:268–275. pmid:23279800
- 85. Moulik S, Chaudhuri SJ, Sardar B, Ghosh M, Saha B, Das NK, Chatterjee M: Monitoring of Parasite Kinetics in Indian Post-Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. Clin Infect Dis 2018, 66:404–410. pmid:29020350
- 86. Ramesh V, Dixit KK, Sharma N, Singh R, Salotra P: Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Liposomal Amphotericin B and Miltefosine in Combination for Treatment of Post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis 2020, 221:608–617. pmid:31854451
- 87. Ramesh V, Katara GK, Verma S, Salotra P: Miltefosine as an effective choice in the treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Br J Dermatol 2011, 165:411–414. pmid:21561437
- 88. Singh RP, Picado A, Alam S, Hasker E, Singh SP, Ostyn B, Chappuis F, Sundar S, Boelaert M: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) in visceral leishmaniasis-endemic communities in Bihar, India. Trop Med Int Health 2012.
- 89. Chowdhury S, Haque F, al-Masum A, el Harith A, Karim E: Positive response to sodium antimony gluconate administration in visceral leishmaniasis seropositive patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1991, 44:390–393. pmid:1645929
- 90. Elhassan AM, Ali MS, Zijlstra E, Eltoum IA, Ghalib HW, Ahmed HM: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in the Sudan: peripheral neural involvement. Int J Dermatol 1992, 31:400–403. pmid:1512091
- 91. Jensen AT, Gasim S, Moller T, Ismail A, Gaafar A, Kemp M, el Hassan AM, Kharazmi A, Alce TM, Smith DF, Theander TG: Serodiagnosis of Leishmania donovani infections: assessment of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using recombinant L. donovani gene B protein (GBP) and a peptide sequence of L. donovani GBP. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1999, 93:157–160. pmid:10450438
- 92. Ismail A, El Hassan AM, Kemp K, Gasim S, Kadaru AE, Moller T, Kharazmi A, Theander TG: Immunopathology of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL): T-cell phenotypes and cytokine profile. J Pathol 1999, 189:615–622. pmid:10629566
- 93. Thakur CP, Kumar K: Efficacy of prolonged therapy with stibogluconate in post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Indian J Med Res 1990, 91:144–148. pmid:2160914
- 94. Sengupta S, Chatterjee M: IgG3 and IL10 are effective biomarkers for monitoring therapeutic effectiveness in Post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2021, 15:e0009906. pmid:34758028
- 95. Younis BM, Mudawi Musa A, Monnerat S, Abdelrahim Saeed M, Awad Gasim Khalil E, Elbashir Ahmed A, Ahmed Ali M, Noureldin A, Muthoni Ouattara G, Nyakaya GM, et al: Safety and efficacy of paromomycin/miltefosine/liposomal amphotericin B combinations for the treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in Sudan: A phase II, open label, randomized, parallel arm study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2023, 17:e0011780. pmid:37988402