Figures
Abstract
Background
Schistosomiasis is of great public health concern with a wide distribution and multiple determinants. Due to the advances in schistosomiasis elimination and the need for precision prevention and control, identifying determinants at a fine scale is urgent and necessary, especially for resource deployment in practice. Our study aimed to identify the determinants for the seropositive rate of schistosomiasis at the village level and to explore their spatial variations in local space.
Methodology
The seropositive rates of schistosomiasis were collected from 1714 villages or communities in Human Province, and six spatial regression models including ordinary least squares (OLS), spatial lag model (SLM), spatial error model (SEM), geographically weighted regression (GWR), robust GWR (RGWR) and multiscale GWR (MGWR) were used to fit the data.
Principal/Findings
MGWR was the best-fitting model (R2: 0.821, AICc:2727.092). Overall, the nearest distance from the river had the highest mean negative correlation, followed by proportion of households using well water and the annual average daytime surface temperature. The proportions of unmodified toilets showed the highest mean positive correlation, followed by the snail infested area, and the number of cattle. In spatial variability, the regression coefficients for the nearest distance from the river, annual average daytime surface temperature and the proportion of unmodified toilets were significant in all villages or communities and varied little in local space. The other significant determinants differed substantially in local space and had significance ratios ranging from 41% to 70%, including the number of cattle, the snail infested area and the proportion of households using well water.
Conclusions/Significance
Our study shows that MGWR was well performed for the spatial variability of schistosomiasis in Hunan province. The spatial variability was different for different determinants. The findings for the determinants for the seropositive rate and mapped variability for some key determinants at the village level can be used for developing precision intervention measure for schistosomiasis control.
Author summary
The elimination of schistosomiasis depends critically on the identification of a set of determinants. A site-specific analysis of the determinants allows organizers to adjust and clarify the focus areas for the next round. This analysis, based on anecdotal evidence and investigations specific to a narrow geographic area at a fine scale, would enhance our understanding of the determinants. Especially for areas where elimination goals are to be achieved, local spatial variation in determinants is worth exploring in depth.
In this analysis we included the seropositive rates of schistosomiasis from 1714 villages or communities and established six spatial regression models. Benefiting from determinants with different bandwidths, MGWR was good at simulating schistosomiasis. We also explored the spatial variability of multiple determinants and mapped variability for some key determinants at the village level. We hope the findings will be used for developing precision intervention measure for schistosomiasis control.
Citation: Tong Y, Tang L, Xia M, Li G, Hu B, Huang J, et al. (2023) Identifying determinants for the seropositive rate of schistosomiasis in Hunan province, China: A multi-scale geographically weighted regression model. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 17(7): e0011466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011466
Editor: Uwem Friday Ekpo, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, NIGERIA
Received: April 9, 2023; Accepted: June 16, 2023; Published: July 13, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Tong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province of China (2121SK2032 to JZ). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1. Introduction
Schistosomiasis, caused by infecting with schistosomes, is a parasitic disease with a global distribution of 78 countries and regions, located in Asia, Africa and Latin America [1]. Over the past decade, schistosomiasis has claimed between 1.5 and 2.5 million years lived with disability (YLDs) per year [2,3]. It is estimated that over 240 million people worldwide are affected by schistosomiasis, and the vast majority of them live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [4,5]. The disease is significantly correlated with both poverty and poor public health, which highlights the importance of social infrastructure and public health measures [6]. Despite the widespread implementation of targeted preventive chemotherapy, schistosomiasis remains highly prevalent in many endemic areas [7] and has been receiving an increasing attention in recent years, partly due to its link to increased susceptibility HIV-1 infection [8].
In China, schistosomiasis is one of the highest priorities identified by the government for infectious disease control [9], but there are new challenges emerged in recent years [10]. Due to the low parasite load after treatment, the Kato Katz Method (KKM) is not sensitive enough to determine the status of schistosomiasis in hotspots [11,12]. Misdiagnosis caused by inaccurate parasitological tests is also common in the context of low infection rates as a result of prevention and control measures [13,14], and more accurate methods are needed [11,15]. Indirect hemagglutination screening (IHA) is widely used as a complementary or alternative diagnostic method due to its high sensitivity and low-cost [11,15]. Especially in areas with numerous epidemiological hotspots, underdeveloped economies and dense populations, it is important to use the IHA to identify all possible schistosome infections.
The transmission of schistosomiasis is complex and heterogeneous and is affected by many factors, including environmental and demographic factors [16,17]. Cattle are also important animal factors and 90% of the transmission of schistosomiasis in China occurs in cattle [18–20]. In addition, behavior factors are another crucial element. The WHO recommendations for 2022 highlight the need and urgency for behavioral change interventions to halt the progression of schistosomiasis in endemic areas [21]. Furthermore, Lo et al. noted the analysis of data at the village level is also necessary, which would help monitor and track effective coverage of these persistent hot spots in behavior intervention efforts, and to prioritize them for additional intervention [21].To develop effective intervention measures, especially for the persistent hot spots, it is important to identify the determinants of schistosomiasis transmission at fine scales [16,22] such as at the village level [21].
Spatial models, such as global and local regression models, can be used to examine the geographical determinants [16,23] and to describe long-term dynamics of diseases [24]. Clearly defining the exact areas and associations for determinants help further tailor efficient treatments to local conditions. This study aimed to identify determinants for the seropositive rate of schistosomiasis at the village level and to explore spatial variation in local space, so as to provide guidelines for developing precision intervention measure for schistosomiasis control.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study area
The study area is situated in Hunan Province, China, between 24°37′ and 30°08′ N north latitude and 108°47′ and 114°16′ E east longitude [25]. With 24,986 estimated schistosomiasis cases in 2018, Hunan Province is the main schistosomiasis endemic region in China [26,27]. The endemic areas in Hunan are in 41 surrounding counties of the Dongting Lake.
2.2. Data collection and preparation
In autumn 2020, a sampling survey of schistosomiasis was conducted in Hunan Province. This survey included all villages or communities that had not reached the goal of transmission interruption as well as some villages or communities that had reached the goal of transmission interruption and disease elimination but required to be surveyed in rotation within three years and five years, respectively. Indirect hemagglutination screening (IHA) was applied as a diagnostic tool for schistosomiasis infection in this survey. We calculated the seropositive rate as the number of IHA positives divided by the total number of IHA testers at the village level. The village levels referred to the village or community as the basic unit. Further, seropositive rates were joined to the administrative boundary shapefile of villages or communities in ArcGIS (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA) [26] At the same time, determinants related to schistosomiasis, such as number of populations, fishermen, cattle, and sheep, the snail infested area, proportions of households using well water, unmodified toilet, and biogas digester, were collected at the village level.
2.3. Determinant factors
We compiled socioeconomic, demographic, environmental, animal and behavioral factors from this field survey as well as public databases such as gross domestic product, surface temperature and climate (S1 Table). The nearest distance from the river was calculated based on the map of rivers in China in ArcGIS. We unified the projection coordinate system and extracted them to the extent of Hunan Province. Then, all factors were collated and matched according to coordinates in ArcGIS at the village level and normalized to eliminate the influence from their different dimensions and units [28].
We used stepwise regression to explore the relationship between these factors and the seropositive rate. To avoid the effect of multicollinearity, we only kept the statistically significant factors (P<0.05) with the variance inflation factor (VIF) less than 5 [28,29], and 8 factors were included in the final spatial models (Table 1). The statistical descriptions for the selected factors before normalizing were summarized in Table 2.
2.4. Global spatial analysis
2.4.1. Ordinary least squares (OLS).
OLS is a global spatial regression method [23], and assumes that dependent variables are spatially independent of each other without spatial dependence and is generally defined as [30]:
(1)
2.4.2. Spatial lag model (SLM).
SLM assumes an interdependence between the dependent variable and explanatory variables. The addition of a spatially lagged dependent variable to the regression model is used to account for inherent spatial interactions and dependencies [31,32]. SLM is generally defined as [33]:
(2)
where ρ is the spatial autoregressive parameter and wi is a spatial weights matrix. The spillover effects of nearby sites are described by both the spatial lag-dependent variable and the weight matrix [34]. Lee has proved that OLS is a consistent estimator for a spatial lag specification based on the group-wise weights [35].
2.4.3. Spatial error model (SEM).
SEM also assumes an interdependence between the dependent variable and explanatory variables. It works through the error term to describe the spatial dependence, which is generally defined as [33]:
(3)
where ξi is the spatial component of the error and λ is the level of correlation between these components. SEM is also one of the variants of OLS, incorporating spatial weights and measuring spatial dependence with an error term.
2.5. Local spatial analysis
2.5.1. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) and robust GWR (RGWR).
Based on the development of the general regression model, GWR allows for spatial variation in the relationship between explanatory variables and dependent variables, as known as “parameters to vary spatially” [36]. GWR reveals natural associations between variables by assigning higher weights to observations near sample points [37]. Basic GWR is generally defined as:
(4)
where β0(ui, vi) is the intercept; βj(ui, vi) is the value of the continuous function at point (ui, vi); xij is the value of the jth explanatory variable at point i; and εi is a random error term.
The effect of outliers is weakened in RGWR [38]. Sample data with large external studentized residuals are first removed from the initial GWR fit, and then the filtered data are refitted using the basic GWR [39].
2.5.2. Multiscale GWR (MGWR).
MGWR is an extension of GWR that allows the scale of all relationships are not fixed over space [40]. MGWR matches each explanatory variable to its unique bandwidth. Differences in bandwidth represent differences in spatial scale, and by capturing the effects of scale in spatial processes, MGWR can capture spatial heterogeneity more accurately [41]. MGWR is generally defined as [40]:
(5)
where bwj is the bandwidth used by the jth variable regression coefficient. MGWR is calibrated using a back-fitting algorithm and can be reformulated as a generalized additive model in practice [23,40].
2.6. Model development
To examine the relationship between determinants and the seropositive rate, we used six spatial models including three global models (ordinary least squares (OLS), spatial lag model (SLM), spatial error model (SEM)) and three local models (geographically weighted regression (GWR), robust GWR (RGWR) and multiscale GWR (MGWR)). For approaching normality before constructing these regression models, the seropositive rate values were boxcox-transformed after adding one percent overall [42]. Global spatial models were conducted in GeoDa 1.14 (Anselin, Chicago, IL, USA) and the first-order Queens’ contiguity was used to form the weight matrix. Local spatial models were developed by an open-source platform (https://sgsup.asu.edu/sparc/mgwr) and GWmodel packages in R 4.1.0 (R Development Core Team, 2021). We used the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) to optimize the bandwidth and selected the fixed Gaussian kernel [43,44]. The model performances were evaluated by calculating the coefficient of determination (R2) and AICc [44,45]. Better model performance is evidenced by a higher R2 value and a lower AICc value.
3. Results
A total of 1718 administrative villages or communities were included in our study and 32.4% (558/1718) of them had a seropositive rate of 0. Of 1160 villages or communities that had a seropositive rate greater than 0, 427 had a seropositive rate less than 1.0%, 574 had a rate between 1.0% and 4.9%, 125 had a rate between 5.0% and 9.9%, 30 had a rate between 10.0% and 19.9% and 4 had a rate between 20.0% and 60.0%. Considering the effect of outliers on the models, we removed the 4 sites with a seropositive rate of 20.0% or more (20.2%, 35.5%, 48.0% and 54.1%), and 1714 villages or communities were included in modeling. Fig 1 shows the distribution of the seropositive rates of 1714 villages or communities. The sites with a high seropositive rate were mainly distributed in the northern and southern sides of Dongting Lake.
(A) China. (B) Hunan province. (C) Study area. The source of the basemap shapefile was from the open access platform: National Platform for Common Geospatial Information Services (www.tianditu.gov.cn).
Table 3 shows that all the factors were closely related to the seropositive rate in the OLS regression model (P<0.05). However, the OLS model had the poorest fitness with a low confidence in the coefficients of factors. The Jarque-Bera test scores and White’s test indicated that the errors were not normally distributed and heteroskedasticity existed (P<0.001). Significant Moran I (error) scores indicated the strong spatial autocorrelation among the residuals (P<0.001). The above effects clarified the necessity to apply other global and local spatial models in our study.
The significant Lagrange multiplier lag (LM-lag) and Lagrange multiplier error (LM-err) statistics (P<0.001) indicated the presence of both spatial lag and spatial error effects. In contrast, SLM and SEM performed much better than OLS, with higher values of R2 and lower AIC. In SLM, all the factors except for Riverdis were correlated with the seropositive rate, while all the factors except for GDP, WIN, UToilets and Riverdis were correlated with the seropositive rate in SEM. The absolute values of the regression coefficients of the factors ranked differently in the SLM and SEM (Table 3).
Table 4 shows the performance of local spatial models. R2 for both the GWR and RGWR were 0.792, or 79.2% of the total variation of the seropositive rate can be explained by the study factors (Table 4). RGWR excluded the effect of outliers over space. The consistency in model performance suggests that the outlier effect was not important in our study. MGWR is the best fit model with the highest R2 of 0.821 and the lowest AICc.
MGWR was used to further explore the relationship between determinants and the seropositive rate for each local space. For each factor, then we calculated the proportion of villages or communities with the significant coefficient in all villages or communities (Table 5). In the MGWR, 41% to 100% of villages or communities had significant coefficients for Daylst, Cattle, Snails, Wellwater, UToilets and Riverdis, but 0% for GDP and WIN.
Table 5 also shows the regression coefficients for determinants with non-zero significance ratios in MGWR. Overall, Riverdis had the highest mean negative correlation, followed by Wellwater and Daylst. UToilets had the highest mean positive correlation, followed by Snails and Cattle.
In spatial variability, the regression coefficients for Daylst, UToilets and Riverdis were significant in all villages or communities and the differences for each of these factors were very small in local space. However, other variables differed a lot in local space and had significance ratios ranging from 41% to 70%.
Fig 2 shows significant regression coefficients for the study factors that differed substantially in local space in MGWR. Cattle displayed a positive correlation distribution in villages or communities close to Dongting Lake, namely the closer to the lower reaches of the lake, the higher the correlation for Cattle. The regression coefficient for Cattle was not statistically insignificant for the villages or communities far from the lake. For Snails, the significant regression coefficients were concentrated in the north-western side of Dongting Lake. For Wellwater, there was an overall negative correlation, and only a few villages surroundings the lake were anomalously positively correlated.
The source of the basemap shapefile was from the open access platform: National Platform for Common Geospatial Information Services (www.tianditu.gov.cn).
Fig 3 illustrates the spatial distribution of local R2 in MGWR. The local R2 in areas surrounding the Dongting Lake were generally high, indicating a good fit in MGWR. On the contrary, some scattered areas away from the Dongting Lake showed a low local R2 with a poor model performance. The highest local R2 was 0.99, with 59.1% (1013/1714) of the local R2 above 0.5 and 28.4% (487/1714) of the local R2 above 0.8.
The source of the basemap shapefile was from the open access platform: National Platform for Common Geospatial Information Services (www.tianditu.gov.cn).
The residuals are the values of differences between the observed and predicted values of seropositive rates, which are important key indicators of model structure and performance. The residuals overall demonstrated a random pattern of spatial distribution (Fig 4). The absolute values of the residuals were less than 2.5 and 96.2% (1649/1714) of the areas had residuals between 1 and -1. All of these indicated reliable structure of MGWR in this study [34,46].
The source of the basemap shapefile was from the open access platform: National Platform for Common Geospatial Information Services (www.tianditu.gov.cn).
4. Discussion
This study investigated determinants for the seropositive rate of schistosomiasis in 1714 villages or communities of Human Province and explored their spatial distributions by six spatial regression models. We examined the correlations between the study factors and the seropositive rate at the village level and further explored spatial variation in local space. To the best of our knowledge, it is the comprehensive inclusion of factors, with particular inclusion of interventions such as drinking water sources and toilet conversion at the village level.
In all the models, the nearest distance from a river showed a consistent negative correlation, which was consistent with similar regression coefficients across villages. This negative correlation could be explained by the convenience of exposure to epidemic water for residents [47]. Alene et al. revealed a similar negative association between the distance to water bodies and the schistosome infection rate diagnosed by PCR using a Bayesian spatial model [17]. A deeper analysis of spatial heterogeneity revealed no matter in which village or community, the regression coefficients for this determinant in MGWR were similar and high-contributing. These results in local space further supported the important impact of distance from river on the transmission of schistosomiasis. The proportion of households using well water also showed a negative correlation with the seropositive rate in all models, indicating that using well water played a protective role in the transmission of schistosomiasis. However, there was a spatial heterogeneity for using well water. Although the regression coefficients were negative in the vast majority of areas (Fig 2), a small number of areas surrounding the Dongting Lake demonstrated a positive correlation. One possible reason is that the well water in these areas is contaminated by Dongting Lake, which needs further investigations to identify. Another possible reason is that the local R2 in these areas is not high, reducing the explanatory power of positive regression coefficients [48]. For the two determinants, changing the exposure of the contaminated river seems to be the key. Additional measures should be taken to minimize the exposure to infected water, especially for households living near the river.
There was a negative correlation between annual average daytime surface temperature and seropositive rates of schistosomiasis in all villages or communities. Similarly, Su et al. found the daytime land surface temperature was significantly negatively associated with schistosomiasis prevalence by the fixed rank kriging (FRK) model and the integrodifferential equation (IDE) model [49]. For the negative correlation, a possible explanation is that surface temperatures are not conducive to snail density. Previous studies have shown that land surface temperature was associated negatively with snail density [50,51]. Given the positive role of snails in schistosomiasis transmission, surface temperature may reduce schistosomiasis infection by reducing snail density. Notably, the correlations among surface temperature, snail population and schistosomiasis infection vary in different studies, for example, unrelated, positively correlated, negatively correlated or complex correlations [49,52–55]. It may suggest that the correlation between surface temperature and schistosomiasis infection needs to be treated specifically in the context of the actual study area.
The proportion of unmodified toilets had the highest mean positive correlation and was significant in all local areas in MGWR. Previous studies found that toilet renovation could reduce the prevalence of schistosomiasis in both rural and urban areas [56,57]. When the spatial heterogeneity of toilets was further considered in this study, we found toilet renovation was still applicable in all local areas at the village level. Although we did not find detailed data pertaining to toilets, Phillips et al. emphasize the importance of good maintenance and high hygienic quality of toilets in reducing the transmission of schistosomiasis [58].
Some determinants showed a heterogeneity in association with the seropositive rate in different local spaces. For instance, cattle displayed a positive correlation distribution for villages close to Dongting Lake; however, in nearly half of the areas away from the lake, the impact of cattle was insignificant (Fig 2). It laterally supported the effectiveness of interventions targeting cattle in areas around Dongting Lake [59,60]. A spatial variation was also observed for snails that had a strong correlation with the seropositive rate exited in the northwest of Dongting Lake. It may be due to the high density of living snails in these areas [61], where snail control measures should be strengthened.
Due to the impact of various bandwidths and high-order multiple inferences, the distribution of a determinant varies across the local models [62,63]. Compared to GWR, MGWR is often more cautious and effective [23,43], and in this study, the fitted R2 increased from 0.792 to 0.821 (Table 4). MGWR also has an advantage of allowing different spatial scales and match varying bandwidth [40].
The study has some limitations. IHA cannot distinguish between recent and distant infections for schistosomiasis [19,64]. Serological data have been frequently used in previous studies due to their high sensitivity [11,19,65], but there is a concern for their low specificity (i.e., high false positive rate) [64,66]. Theoretically, the false positive rate comes from cross-reactions to other parasites than schistosome in the IHA technique and long-term antibody concentration level after infection and treatment [67,68]. The presence of false positive rates means that the seropositive rate amplifies the actual schistosomiasis infection to some extent. Especially in the villages which had reached the transmission interruption or elimination in this study, a certain number of cured schistosomiasis patients resulted in a relatively high false positive rate, which somewhat amplified the regression coefficient of the determinants in models. In addition, this study only analyzed determinants at the village level and lacked the analysis of individual factors. Also, the regression coefficients of determinants differed in spatial models, which might limit the applicability of these findings to some extent.
In this study, MGWR performed better than other models for the spatial variability of schistosomiasis in Hunan province. The spatial variability was different for different determinants. The findings for the determinants for the seropositive rate and mapped variability for some key determinants at the village level can be used for developing precision intervention measure for schistosomiasis control.
Supporting information
S1 Table. All determinants we collected and analyzed initially.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011466.s001
(CSV)
References
- 1. Gryseels B, Polman K, Clerinx J, Kestens L. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2006;368(9541):1106–18. pmid:16997665
- 2. James SL AD, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858. pmid:30496104
- 3. Rinaldo D, Perez-Saez J, Vounatsou P, Utzinger J, Arcand JL. The economic impact of schistosomiasis. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021;10(1):134. pmid:34895355
- 4. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223. pmid:23245608
- 5. Lai YS, Biedermann P, Ekpo UF, Garba A, Mathieu E, Midzi N, et al. Spatial distribution of schistosomiasis and treatment needs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and geostatistical analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(8):927–40. pmid:26004859
- 6. Barnett R. Schistosomiasis Lancet. 2018;392(10163):2431.
- 7. Assaré RK, N’Tamon RN, Bellai LG, Koffi JA, Mathieu TI, Ouattara M, et al. Characteristics of persistent hotspots of Schistosoma mansoni in western Côte d’Ivoire. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):337.
- 8. Secor WE. The effects of schistosomiasis on HIV/AIDS infection, progression and transmission. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7(3):254–9. pmid:22327410
- 9. Wang W, Liang YS, Hong QB, Dai JR. African schistosomiasis in mainland China: risk of transmission and countermeasures to tackle the risk. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1):249. pmid:23985040
- 10. Wang W, Bergquist R, King CH, Yang K. Elimination of schistosomiasis in China: Current status and future prospects. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(8):e0009578. pmid:34351907
- 11. Chen C, Guo Q, Fu Z, Liu J, Lin J, Xiao K, et al. Reviews and advances in diagnostic research on Schistosoma japonicum. Acta Trop. 2021;213:105743. pmid:33159894
- 12. Barda B, Schindler C, Wampfler R, Ame S, Ali SM, Keiser J. Comparison of real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20(1):298. pmid:33008301
- 13. Lin DD, Liu YM, Hu F, Li YF, Tao B, Yuan M, et al. [Evaluation on application of common diagnosis methods for schistosomiasis japonica in endemic areas of China. III. Analysis and evaluation of underestimation of prevalence of Schistosoma japonicum infection by routine Kato-Katz technique]. Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2011;23(6):642–7. pmid:22379818
- 14. Lv C, Hong Y, Fu Z, Lu K, Cao X, Wang T, et al. Evaluation of recombinant multi-epitope proteins for diagnosis of goat schistosomiasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:135. pmid:26955957
- 15. Xie SY, Yuan M, Ji MJ, Hu F, Li ZJ, Liu YM, et al. Immune responses result in misdiagnosis of Schistosoma japonicum by immunodiagnosis kits in egg-positive patients living in a low schistosomiasis transmission area of China. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:95. pmid:24598061
- 16. Manyangadze T, Chimbari MJ, Gebreslasie M, Mukaratirwa S. Risk factors and micro-geographical heterogeneity of Schistosoma haematobium in Ndumo area, uMkhanyakude district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Acta Trop. 2016;159:176–84.
- 17. Alene KA, Gordon CA, Clements ACA, Williams GM, Gray DJ, Zhou XN, et al. Spatial Analysis of Schistosomiasis in Hunan and Jiangxi Provinces in the People’s Republic of China. Diseases. 2022;10(4).
- 18. Gray DJ, Williams GM, Li Y, McManus DP. Transmission dynamics of Schistosoma japonicum in the lakes and marshlands of China. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4058. pmid:19115007
- 19. Wang XH, Zhou XN, Vounatsou P, Chen Z, Utzinger J, Yang K, et al. Bayesian spatio-temporal modeling of Schistosoma japonicum prevalence data in the absence of a diagnostic ’gold’ standard. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(6):e250. pmid:18545696
- 20. Cao ZG, Zhao YE, Lee Willingham A, Wang TP. Towards the Elimination of Schistosomiasis japonica through Control of the Disease in Domestic Animals in The People’s Republic of China: A Tale of over 60Years. Adv Parasitol. 2016;92:269–306. pmid:27137450
- 21. Lo NC, Bezerra FSM, Colley DG, Fleming FM, Homeida M, Kabatereine N, et al. Review of 2022 WHO guidelines on the control and elimination of schistosomiasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(11):e327–e35. pmid:35594896
- 22. Peng WX, Tao B, Clements A, Jiang QL, Zhang ZJ, Zhou YB, et al. Identifying high-risk areas of schistosomiasis and associated risk factors in the Poyang Lake region, China. Parasitology. 2010;137(7):1099–107.
- 23. Mollalo A, Vahedi B, Rivera KM. GIS-based spatial modeling of COVID-19 incidence rate in the continental United States. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728:138884. pmid:32335404
- 24. Mari L, Ciddio M, Casagrandi R, Perez-Saez J, Bertuzzo E, Rinaldo A, et al. Heterogeneity in schistosomiasis transmission dynamics. J Theor Biol. 2017;432:87–99.
- 25. Wu JY, Zhou YB, Li LH, Zheng SB, Liang S, Coatsworth A, et al. Identification of optimum scopes of environmental factors for snails using spatial analysis techniques in Dongting Lake Region, China. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:216. pmid:24886456
- 26. Li FY, Hou XY, Tan HZ, Williams GM, Gray DJ, Gordon CA, et al. Current Status of Schistosomiasis Control and Prospects for Elimination in the Dongting Lake Region of the People’s Republic of China. Front Immunol. 2020;11:574136. pmid:33162989
- 27. Zhang LJ, Xu ZM, Guo JY, Dai SM, Zhou XN. Endemic status of schistosomiasis in People’s Republic of China in 2018. Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control. 2019;31(6):576–82. pmid:32064798
- 28. Tran DX, Pearson D, Palmer A, Lowry J, Gray D, Dominati EJ. Quantifying spatial non-stationarity in the relationship between landscape structure and the provision of ecosystem services: An example in the New Zealand hill country. Sci Total Environ. 2022;808:152126. pmid:34863745
- 29. Review by:, Hans Christian, Jessen . Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. by S. Menard. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1996.
- 30. Ward M, editor Spatial Regression Models 2008.
- 31. Anselin L, Arribas-Bel D. Spatial Fixed Effects and Spatial Dependence. Papers in Regional Science. 2013;92(1):3–17.
- 32. Akinwumiju AS, Oluwafemi O, Mohammed YD, Mobolaji JW. Geospatial evaluation of COVID-19 mortality: Influence of socio-economic status and underlying health conditions in contiguous USA. Appl Geogr. 2022;141:102671. pmid:35261415
- 33. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1990;85(411):160.
- 34. Mansour S, Al Kindi A, Al-Said A, Al-Said A, Atkinson P. Sociodemographic determinants of COVID-19 incidence rates in Oman: Geospatial modelling using multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR). Sustain Cities Soc. 2021;65:102627. pmid:33288993
- 35. Lee Lung-Fei. CONSISTENCY AND EFFICIENCY OF LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATION FOR MIXED REGRESSIVE, SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELS. Econometric Theory. 2002;18(02).
- 36. Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME. Geographically Weighted Regression: A Method for Exploring Spatial Nonstationarity Spatial. 2010.
- 37. McMillen D. P. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2004;86(2):554–6.
- 38. Qu M, Xu G, Liu H, Zhao Y, Huang B. Additional sampling using in-situ portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) for rapid and high-precision investigation of soil heavy metals at a regional scale. Environmental Pollution. 2022;292:118324–. pmid:34637827
- 39. Harris P, Fotheringham AS, Juggins S. Robust Geographically Weighted Regression: A Technique for Quantifying Spatial Relationships Between Freshwater Acidification Critical Loads and Catchment Attributes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2010;100(2):286–306.
- 40. Fotheringham AS, Yang W, Kang W. Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR). Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 2017;107(6):1247–65.
- 41. Yu H, Fotheringham AS, Li Z, Oshan T, Wolf LJ. Inference in Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression. Geographical Analysis. 2019(1).
- 42. da Silva MV, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, Cobuci JA, Gasbarre LC. Box-Cox Transformation and Random Regression Models for Fecal egg Count Data. Front Genet. 2011;2:112. pmid:22303406
- 43. Chen Y, Yin G, Hou Y. Street centrality and vitality of a healthy catering industry: A case study of Jinan, China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1032668. pmid:36504983
- 44. Liu H, Huang B, Gao S, Wang J, Li R. Impacts of the evolving urban development on intra-urban surface thermal environment: Evidence from 323 Chinese cities. Science of The Total Environment. 2021. pmid:33545479
- 45. Zhao C, Jennifer J, Weng Q, Russell W. A Geographically Weighted Regression Analysis of the Underlying Factors Related to the Surface Urban Heat Island Phenomenon. Remote Sensing. 2018;10(9):1428.
- 46. Xue C, Chen X, Xue L, Zhang H, Chen J, Li D. Modeling the spatially heterogeneous relationships between tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services and potential drivers considering geographic scale in Bairin Left Banner, China. Sci Total Environ. 2023;855:158834. pmid:36122723
- 47. Fornillos RJC, Fontanilla IKC, Chigusa Y, Kikuchi M, Kirinoki M, Kato-Hayashi N, et al. Infection rate of Schistosoma japonicum in the snail Oncomelania hupensis quadrasi in endemic villages in the Philippines: Need for snail surveillance technique. Trop Biomed. 2019;36(2):402–11. pmid:33597401
- 48. Yang Y, Li H. Monitoring spatiotemporal characteristics of land-use carbon emissions and their driving mechanisms in the Yellow River Delta: A grid-scale analysis. Environ Res. 2022;214(Pt 4):114151. pmid:36037923
- 49. Su Q, Bergquist R, Ke Y, Dai J, He Z, Gao F, et al. A comparison of modelling the spatio-temporal pattern of disease: a case study of schistosomiasis japonica in Anhui Province, China. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2022;116(6):555–63. pmid:34893918
- 50. Manyangadze T, Chimbari MJ, Rubaba O, Soko W, Mukaratirwa S. Spatial and seasonal distribution of Bulinus globosus and Biomphalaria pfeifferi in Ingwavuma, uMkhanyakude district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Implications for schistosomiasis transmission at micro-geographical scale. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):222. pmid:33892778
- 51. Zheng Y, Shi Y, Li S, Deng W, Zhou J, Hu B, et al. Environmental Determinants for Snail Density in Dongting Lake Region: An Ecological Study Incorporating Spatial Regression. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;107(6):1178–84. pmid:36375461
- 52. Yang GJ, Vounatsou P, Zhou XN, Tanner M, Utzinger J. A Bayesian-based approach for spatio-temporal modeling of county level prevalence of Schistosoma japonicum infection in Jiangsu province, China. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(2):155–62. pmid:15710436
- 53. Ajakaye OG, Adedeji OI, Ajayi PO. Modeling the risk of transmission of schistosomiasis in Akure North Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria using satellite derived environmental data. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(7):e0005733. pmid:28700640
- 54. Scholte RG, Gosoniu L, Malone JB, Chammartin F, Utzinger J, Vounatsou P. Predictive risk mapping of schistosomiasis in Brazil using Bayesian geostatistical models. Acta Trop. 2014;132:57–63. pmid:24361640
- 55. Oso OG, Sunday JO, Odaibo AB. Models for predicting bulinids species habitats in southwestern Nigeria. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2022;18:e00256. pmid:35712128
- 56. Tupps C, Kargbo-Labour I, Paye J, Dhakal S, Hodges MH, Jones AH, et al. Community-wide prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and Schistosoma mansoni in two districts of Sierra Leone. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(5):e0010410. pmid:35594318
- 57. Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2002;912:i–vi, 1–57, back cover.
- 58. Phillips AE, Ower AK, Mekete K, Liyew EF, Maddren R, Belay H, et al. Association between water, sanitation, and hygiene access and the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth and schistosome infections in Wolayita, Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15(1):410. pmid:36333779
- 59. Gray DJ, Li YS, Williams GM, Zhao ZY, Harn DA, Li SM, et al. A multi-component integrated approach for the elimination of schistosomiasis in the People’s Republic of China: design and baseline results of a 4-year cluster-randomised intervention trial. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44(9):659–68. pmid:24929133
- 60. Utzinger J, Zhou XN, Chen MG, Bergquist R. Conquering schistosomiasis in China: the long march. Acta Trop. 2005;96(2–3):69–96. pmid:16312039
- 61. Lv C, Li YL, Deng WP, Bao ZP, Xu J, Lv S, et al. The Current Distribution of Oncomelania hupensis Snails in the People’s Republic of China Based on a Nationwide Survey. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023;8(2). pmid:36828536
- 62. Yang L, Meng F, Ma C, Hou D. Elucidating the spatial determinants of heavy metals pollution in different agricultural soils using geographically weighted regression. Sci Total Environ. 2022;853:158628. pmid:36087662
- 63. Byrne G, Charlton M, Fotheringham S. Multiple Dependent Hypothesis Tests in Geographically Weighted Regression. Giscience & Remote Sensing. 2009.
- 64. Doenhoff MJ, Chiodini PL, Hamilton JV. Specific and sensitive diagnosis of schistosome infection: can it be done with antibodies? Trends Parasitol. 2004;20(1):35–9. pmid:14700588
- 65. Steinmann P, Zhou XN, Matthys B, Li YL, Li HJ, Chen SR, et al. Spatial risk profiling of Schistosoma japonicum in Eryuan county, Yunnan province, China. Geospat Health. 2007;2(1):59–73. pmid:18686256
- 66. Deelder AM, Qian ZL, Kremsner PG, Acosta L, Rabello AL, Enyong P, et al. Quantitative diagnosis of Schistosoma infections by measurement of circulating antigens in serum and urine. Trop Geogr Med. 1994;46(4 Spec No):233–8. pmid:7825226
- 67. Cai YC, Xu JF, Steinmann P, Chen SH, Chu YH, Tian LG, et al. Field comparison of circulating antibody assays versus circulating antigen assays for the detection of schistosomiasis japonica in endemic areas of China. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:138. pmid:24684924
- 68. Duus LM, Christensen AV, Navntoft D, Tarp B, Nielsen HV, Petersen E. The schistosoma-specific antibody response after treatment in non-immune travellers. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(4):285–90. pmid:19221932