Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Comparative genomics of Japanese encephalitis virus shows low rates of recombination and a small subset of codon positions under episodic diversifying selection

  • Mark Sistrom ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Mark.Sistrom@nt.gov.au

    Affiliations Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism, Berrimah Veterinary Laboratories, Darwin, Australia, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Faculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Australia

  • Hannah Andrews,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism, Berrimah Veterinary Laboratories, Darwin, Australia

  • Danielle L. Edwards

    Roles Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Faculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Australia, Department of Natural Sciences, Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, Darwin, Australia

Abstract

Orthoflavivirus japonicum (JEV) is the dominant cause of viral encephalitis in the Asian region with 100,000 cases and 25,000 deaths reported annually. The genome is comprised of a single polyprotein that encodes three structural and seven non-structural proteins. We collated a dataset of 349 complete genomes from a number of public databases, and analysed the data for recombination, evolutionary selection and phylogenetic structure. There are low rates of recombination in JEV, subsequently recombination is not a major evolutionary force shaping JEV. We found a strong overall signal of purifying selection in the genome, which is the main force affecting the evolutionary dynamics in JEV. There are also a small number of genomic sites under episodic diversifying selection, especially in the envelope protein and non-structural proteins 3 and 5. Overall, these results support previous analyses of JEV evolutionary genomics and provide additional insight into the evolutionary processes shaping the distribution and adaptation of this important pathogenic arbovirus.

Author summary

This comparative study of Japanese Encephalitis Virus is the largest genomic analysis of the virus to date. We undertake a suite of analyses to investigate phylogenetic relationships, rates of recombination and patterns of genomic selection. We show that recombination is not a significant driver of evolution in JEV, demonstrate support for previous phylogenetic reconstructions of the virus, and find a number of sites across the genome under episodic diversifying selection. These adaptive hotspots of evolution serve as key genomic points for the adaptive evolution of this important vector borne pathogen.

Introduction

Orthoflavivirus japonicum (JEV) is an arbovirus belonging to the Flaviviridiae family with a zoonotic cycle involving swine as reservoir hosts, waterbirds as carriers and mosquitoes of the two genera Culex and Aedes as vectors [1,2]. While humans are dead-end hosts for JEV as they generally display low viremias insufficient to allow for infection of feeding mosquitoes [3], JEV infections of humans have significant health implications, with around 100,000 symptomatic cases of human JEV annually [4,5] resulting in approximately 25,000 deaths [6]. Only between 0.1–4% of human infections result in symptoms [7], however symptomatic cases have a fatality rate of 20–30% [8] and 30–50% of survivors develop long term neurological/psychiatric sequelae [9]. Despite the existence and use of several safe and effective JEV vaccines [8], JEV remains the dominant cause of viral encephalitis in the Asian region–meaning that understanding the evolutionary driving forces governing the range and pathogenicity of JEV are critical to ongoing management and control of this neglected tropical disease.

The JEV genome is 11kb, positive sense, single stranded RNA that comprises a single open reading frame encoding a large polyprotein that is co- and post-translationally cleaved into three structural proteins–capsid (C), precursor to membrane (prM) and envelope proteins (E) and seven non-structural, accessory proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5) [10,11]. The NS1 protein plays an essential role in genome replication [12]–mutations within this gene can have marked effects on RNA replication and infectious virus production [13]. NS2a and b are small, membrane associated proteins that play a role in virus assembly, RNA replication and interferon inhibition [14,15]. Mutations in NS2a have been shown to block virus assembly [16]. NS3 is a large, multifunction protein, encoding enzymatic activities necessary for polyprotein processing, RNA replication, virus assembly and apoptosis [1618]. NS4a and b are both small, hydrophobic proteins. NS4a is involved in RNA replication via a genetic interaction with NS1 [19], and can induce membrane rearrangements and/or the formation of autophagosomes [20]. Mutations in NS4a confer resistance to flavivirus RNA replication inhibitors [21]. NS4b co-localizes with NS3 at sites of RNA replication, and is involved in blocking interferon signalling [22]. NS5 is large multifunctional protein involved in RNA capping and RdRP activities, as well as the induction of interleukin-8 secretion and blocking interferon signalling [23,24].

There are 5 recognized evolutionary lineages of JEV (GI-V) [25]. Historically, GIII was the dominantly detected strain, however it has recently been superseded by GI [2527]. GII is largely confined to Southeast Asia and Northern Australia [28], and GIV and GV are generally confined to tropical Southeast Asia [29], however the 2022 outbreak of JEV in Australia was determined to be GIV, representing a range expansion of this genotype [30]. Vaccines are largely derived from GIII genotypes [29,31] and a growing body of evidence suggests that these vaccines show reduced efficacy toward GI and GV strains [3234].

JEV is an evolutionarily dynamic pathogen with fluid transmission parameters associated with variations in host/vector range and climate change [35,36]. Further, virulence, pathogenicity and immunogenicity appear to vary between strains and remain in flux as the virus evolves in the face of exceptionally dynamic environmental factors [26,35]. Resultantly, contemporary comparative genomic studies are necessary to better understand and predict epidemiological patterns of JEV.

In this study, we analyse the complete genomes of 349 JEV isolates, identifying patterns of polymorphism, phylogeny, recombination and selection. We find that the genome is predominately under purifying selection; however, there are several sites which are subject to adaptive evolution across the phylogeny of JEV. It is likely that the adaptive evolutionary processes underlying the observed dynamism in the host, vector and geographic range of JEV, along with changes in virulence, pathogenicity and immunogenicity are being driven by a relatively small number of mutational changes at the genome scale.

Materials and methods

We downloaded seven isolate genomes from the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) using SRAtoolkit v3.0.0 [37] and one assembly from the NBCI Assembly database. A further 356 complete genomes were downloaded from the NCBI Nucleotide database using Batch Entrez [38]. A further 36 samples were retrieved from the DNA Databank of Japan (DDBJ) SRA database [39], and a further 356 complete genomes were downloaded from the DDBJ nucleotide database [39], for a total dataset of 756 records. When filtered for redundancy (i.e. duplicate submissions in different databases), record accuracy (i.e. non-JEV samples entered in error) and length (i.e. minimum sequence length >10kb), a sequence set of 349 sequences were selected for further analysis (S1 Table). SRA genomes were filtered for read quality using Trimmomatic v0.32 [40] under default parameters, and aligned to a serotype O reference strain (GCA_000863325.1) using BWA v0.7.17 [41] with the mem function. Output SAM files were then sorted and converted to BAM format using SAMtools v1.17 [42]. Variant detection of each BAM file was undertaken using the mpileup function of BCFtools v1.17 [42] before being exported in FASTA format using the consensus function. SRA, Assembly and nucleotide data were then aligned in FASTA format using MUSCLE v5 [43] using the super5 algorithm and guide tree permutation enabled.

Recombination across the genome was calculated using the program RDPv5 [44] with default settings, which implements several methods to detect recombination in a given sequence alignment. Phylogenetic reconstructions were undertaken for the whole genome, as recombination was not found to have a significant impact on genome structure. Phylogenetic reconstructions were conducted using RaxML [45] with default settings and 1,000 bootstrap replicates, using Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MDV) as an outgroup. Phylogenetic model selection was conducted using the Bayesian information criterion implemented in jModelTest2 [46]. Trees were estimated using a GTR model. Selection was initially evaluated for the whole genome by calculating nucleotide diversity (π, the average pairwise difference between all pairs of sequences) and (θ, the Watterson’s estimator of nucleotide diversity) using a sliding window analysis with a window length of 100 and step size of 25 sites implemented in DNAsP v6 [47]. Selection for each gene was tested initially using a codon-based Z test of neutrality implemented in MEGA11 [48]. We calculated overall average Dn-Ds for each gene and probability of neutral model fit using the Nei-Gojobori method with 500 bootstrap replicates. Missing sites were treated with partial deletion with a cut-off of 95%. We further evaluated selection using a number of analyses implemented in the HyPhy2.5 [49]. We implemented a Branch-site Unrestricted Statistical Test for Episodic Selection (BUSTED) [50] to evaluate each gene for episodic selection using the previously calculated tree along all branches of the phylogeny. Secondly, a Mixed Effects Model of Evolution (MEME) [51] was used to test each gene for specific sites under diversifying selection using the same tree as a guide. Finally, we conducted an adaptive branch-site random effects model for episodic selection (aBSREL) analysis on phylogenies for each gene independently to detect branches under episodic selection.

Results and discussion

Recombination

The results of recombination analyses are reported in Table 1 and Fig 1. We found limited evidence of recombination in our dataset, especially in comparison with other viruses for which recombination is noted to be a driving evolutionary force [5254]. Recombination is not widely reported in unsegmented arboviruses [55], however recombination via template switching is thought to be an important driver of evolution in RNA viruses [56] and thought to be most likely to occur within vertebrate hosts during multi-strain infections [57]. Recombination of JEV genotypes would have significant potential implications for vaccine efficacy, as vaccines derived from GIII isolates show reduced efficacy in toward GI and GV strains [3234]. We did find evidence of a small number (n = 18) of recombinant strains from both GI and GIII isolates, largely between closely phylogenetically related isolates and in the mid region of the E protein and NS5 protein respectively (Table 1 and Fig 2). One instance of recombination between a GI and GIII strain was detected, but the support for this recombination event was found only by two of five methods implemented by RDP5 [44] and comprised of a short fragment in the 3’ end of the genome, which contains the most missing data in our alignment. Resultantly, this result is low confidence. We therefore conclude that recombination during multi-strain infection is unlikely to be a major driver in the evolution of genomic diversity in JEV.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Recombination and selection analysis of JEV genomes.

Top legend indicates the locations of protein coding genes, bottom legend indicates position in the genome alignment. Graph A depicts recombination break point probability per site, light grey indicates 99% probability, the mid grey area indicates 95% probability while the dark grey represents non-significant break points. Marginally significant break points were observed in structural protein E and Nonstructural protein 5. Graph B depicts nucleotide diversity (π) calculated using a sliding window analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011459.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Phylogeny of JEV genome sequences, showing the five monophyletic genotypes of JEV.

Branching order in the current analysis is confirmatory of prior studies of evolution of JEV. Node labels indicate bootstrap support, scale is in substitutions per site. The MDV sequence is a Murray Valley encephalitis virus sequence used as an outgroup for the phylogenetic analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011459.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Recombinant strains as detected by RDP5 analysis.

All events were between isolates of the same genotype with the exception of those with unknown parents, and event 16. R–RDP, G–GENECONV, B–Bootscan, M–MaxChi, C–Chimaera, S–SiScan, T– 3Seq, Major parent–major presumed donor of recombined sequence, Minor parent–minor presumed donor of recombined sequence (if more than one recombination event detected).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011459.t001

Phylogenetic relationships

Our phylogenetic analysis resolved the five previously identified genotypes of JEV with high confidence (Fig 1). As we did not identify any novel genotypes in our data, this analysis is largely confirmatory of prior studies [10,26,35] as we found the JEV genotypes fell into 5 reciprocally monophyletic clades in an ascending pattern of diversification from V–I (Fig 1). While we find support for the current classifications of Genotypes I–IV, there is a deep divergence between isolate JF915894 (China, mosquito, 2009) and HM596272 (Malaysia, human, 1952)/KM677246 (Singapore, human, 1952), which may warrant further classification of this genotype (i.e., Genotype V), pending sequencing of additional isolates. We also find two clades within Genotype I conforming to the previously identified clades 1a and 1b [58], however bootstrap support in our analysis was low (56%).It is notable that Genotypes II, IV and V are represented by only one, six and six isolates respectively despite the significant increase in size of the present dataset, indicating either a low prevalence of these genotypes in nature, or a considerable bias in the collection and public dissemination of JEV genomic data. The recent increase in the circulation of Genotype V following 57 years of apparent extinction [59] and expansions into novel geographic areas [60] is an important evolutionary and epidemiological development. Additional genome sequences of this genotype will be critical for determining the evolutionary adaptive context and epidemiological implications of this expansion, especially in the face of potentially reduced efficacy of current vaccines on Genotype V infections [3234]. It is noteworthy that the present study is based on full genomes and that a gene specific approach may increase sampling density of these genotypes.

Selection

Nucleotide diversity analysis showed relatively low rates of mutation across the genome (Fig 2, Graph B), with a notable decrease in π in NS2a and a notable increase in π in NS5. These rates of nucleotide diversity did not necessarily correspond with complementary changes in Dn-Ds ratios (Table 2). All genes deviated significantly from a model of neutral evolution, with strongly negative Dn-Ds values indicative of a strong overall signal of purifying selection.

thumbnail
Table 2. Results of selection analysis.

Test of neutrality was conducted using an averaged codon based, two tailed Z test; Episodic selection was determined using a Branch-site Unrestricted Statistical Test for Episodic Selection; and codon positions under diversifying selection were determined using a Mixed Effects Model of Evolution analysis. The most prevalent amino acid substitution is indicated after each position when non-synonymous.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011459.t002

Branch-site Unrestricted Statistical Test for Episodic Selection (BUSTED) (50) analysis showed that some branches in the phylogenetic tree for the genes E, NS1, NS2a, NS2b, NS3, NS4b and NS5 all displayed episodic diversifying selection (Table 2). Within these genes, a Mixed Effects Model of Evolution (MEME) [51] showed that a small proportion of sites (0.7% of the genome) displayed episodic diversifying selection (Table 2) with the number of sites in each gene found to be under diversifying selection corresponding to the significance of the results of the BUSTED analysis. While summary statistic approaches demonstrate strong evolutionary conservation of genotypes at a genomic scale, more nuanced analysis shows that a small number of sites throughout the genome are diversifying in a manner likely to be adaptive. Of particular interest is the strong episodic diversifying selection of protein E–the major surface protein of the virion. Experimental evolutionary approaches have shown that specific mutations in surface proteins can generate thermo-tolerance in viruses [61,62] and the mutations observed in the JEV E protein may assist in the evolution of this virus to persist in novel environments.

Three mutations observed to be under selection in the E protein (i.e., residues 307, 310 and 390) fall within the β-barrel structure of the protein, thought to be involved in antigenic variation in JEV [63]. Further, seven of the mutations observed to be under selection fall in the Envelope Domain I (EDI) region (i.e., residues 34, 37, 49 (Glu >Lys), 51, 138 (Glu > Lys), 160 (Gly > Arg) and 176 (Ile > Thr)) which controls the orientation of the E protein [64]. The envelope protein mutation E138 detected in this study is a well-characterized neurovirulence associated mutation [65,66]. E176 and E264 also shows reduced neurovirulence in experimental studies [66], with E176 operating synergistically with E138 [66]. West Nile Virus with mutations in residues 67 and 153 of the EDI region show reduced cellular attachment and neuroinvasiveness [67,68], and the mutation at residue 390 lies in a neutralising epitope of Envelope Domain III region (EDIII) in which mutations have been shown to affect cell tropism and virulence [64], however the mutation detected under episodic selection is synonymous in our results.

The Pre-membrane protein (PrM) is important for viral maturation, and mutant variants of PrM have shown increased rates of replication [69], however the selective impacts of the mutation observed in this study (143 (Gly > Arg)) is unknown.

Mutations under selection observed in the NS2a gene fall within three transmembrane segments (pTMS), pTMS1 (4 (Glu > Gly)), pTMS3 and pTMS5 (132) [70]. pTMS1 does not have membrane associated activity, and it’s involvement in the virus life cycle is unclear, however NS2a mutants with substitutions in pTMS1 showed a >1,000-fold reduction in virus yield, an absence of plaque formation and infectious-virus-like particle yields [71] in dengue virus.

A mutation detected as under episodic selection in the NS2b gene (i.e. NS2b78) in this study was also experimentally demonstrated to impact replication (72).

NS3 is a multifunction protein, in which we observed a synonymous mutation at site 150 under selection, in which mutations have been shown to reduce protease activity in dengue virus [71]. In JEV the A78S mutation, which was observed to be under selection in our study, has an effect on viral replication in vitro [72]. A mutation we observed as under selection in this study in NS4b was also found to be under selection between genotypes I and III in a prior study [27].

NS5 is another large multifunctional protein in which we observed several mutations under selection. While several mutations in NS5 have been shown in in vitro studies to be adaptive in the NS5 gene in JEV [73,74], the mutations we observed to be under selection in this study were not among those seen to be experimentally validated, indicating that further experimentation is necessary to determine the causative nature of these mutations.

Similarly, large numbers of sites under diversifying selection were observed in the large, multifunction, non-structural proteins NS3 and NS5, but due to their multifunctional nature, the specific selection pressures driving the diversification of these mutations will be difficult to determine. The mutations under selection we observed in JEV warrant further investigation relevant to their virulence and infectivity.

Finally, we conducted an adaptive branch-site random effects model for episodic selection (aBSREL) analysis and detected branches under episodic selection in the E, NS3 and NS5 proteins, with one, three and two terminal branches under episodic diversifying selection respectively (Table 2). The genomes represented by these branches are either Genotype I or III, and were collected in either China or Taiwan. The dates of isolation range from 1950 to 2008. Given 99.7% of the genome is under stabilizing selection, it is expected that relatively few branches would display episodic diversifying selection, however it is somewhat novel that the branches that display this selection are not from Genotypes IV or V, which are the genotypes showing the most rapid geographic and epidemiological shifts in JEV.

As an analysis of publicly available sequence data submitted to various databases, the present study is inherently limited by the presumed accuracy of these sequences and the completeness of the metadata submitted with those sequences. It is also limited by the inherent biases in the isolates which are chosen for sequencing by the broader scientific community.

Conclusions

Our study conforms to the results of previous studies to demonstrate the five distinct genotypes of JEV determined at the gene level are robust with increased sampling and whole genome phylogenetic analysis. We did however find a relatively deep divergence within Genotype V–albeit based on a small number of isolates. This potentially warrants further splitting of the recognized genotypes in JEV pursuant to the examination of additional isolates.

We demonstrate, like previous studies [25,75,76] that recombination is likely to occur at relatively small scales within JEV genotypes, and confirm a previously identified recombinant JEV strain (i.e. K94P05) [25,76]. Despite significant geographic co-occurrence of genotypes facilitating potential co-infection of hosts with multiple strains of JEV [58,77], it seems as though recombination is unlikely to be a major driver of genomic diversity and evolution.

We show widespread purifying selection acting on the JEV genome, consistent with previous analyses of selection in JEV [58,75] and other flaviruses [78]. It is thought that this strong purifying selection acting on the genome is because JEV relies on infection of both a vertebrate and an arthropod host, meaning that JEV has to endure at least two selective environments during its replication cycle [58]. Despite this overall pattern of purifying selection, we detected a number of sites under episodic diversifying selection. Experimental approaches to determine the functional impact of other mutations shown to be under episodic diversifying selection are likely to yield insights into the evolutionary driving forces that precipitate geographic range, host and vector expansion in JEV.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Metadata for genome sequences used in this study including Accession numbers, host, country, strain name and reported genotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011459.s001

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Richard Weir, Dr Rachel De Arajuo and Dr Vidya Bhardwaj for providing comments on the MS prior to submission. This work would not be possible without the invaluable efforts of the scientists who collected samples, isolated viruses and conducted sequencing experiments to generate the data used in this study.

References

  1. 1. Buescher EL, Scherer WF, Mccluse HE, Moyer JT, Rosenberg MZ, Yoshii Y, Okada Y. 1959. Ecologic Studies of Japanese Encephalitis Virus in Japan. Avian infection. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 8:678–688.
  2. 2. Auerswald H, Maquart P-O, Chevalier V, Boyer S. 2021. Mosquito Vector Competence for Japanese Encephalitis Virus. Viruses 13:1154. pmid:34208737
  3. 3. Endy TP, Nisalak A. 2002. Japanese Encephalitis Virus: Ecology and Epidemiology, p. 11–48. In Mackenzie JS, Barrett ADT, Deubel V (eds.), Japanese Encephalitis and West Nile Viruses. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  4. 4. Campbell G, Hills S, Fischer M, Jacobson J, Hoke C, Hombach J, Marfin A, Solomon T, Tsai T, Tsui V, Ginsburg A. 2011. Estimated global incidence of Japanese encephalitis: Bull World Health Org 89:766–774.
  5. 5. Quan TM, Thao TTN, Duy NM, Nhat TM, Clapham H. 2020. Estimates of the global burden of Japanese encephalitis and the impact of vaccination from 2000–2015. eLife 9:e51027. pmid:32450946
  6. 6. McGuinness SL, Lau CL, Leder K. 2023. The evolving Japanese encephalitis situation in Australia and implications for travel medicine. Journal of Travel Medicine 30:taad029. pmid:36869722
  7. 7. Vaughn DW, Hoke CH Jr. 1992. The Epidemiology of Japanese Encephalitis: Prospects for Prevention. Epidemiologic Reviews 14:197–221. pmid:1337744
  8. 8. Vannice KS, Hills SL, Schwartz LM, Barrett AD, Heffelfinger J, Hombach J, Letson GW, Solomon T, Marfin AA. 2021. The future of Japanese encephalitis vaccination: expert recommendations for achieving and maintaining optimal JE control. 1. npj Vaccines 6:1–9.
  9. 9. Lindquist L. 2018. Recent and historical trends in the epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis and its implication for risk assessment in travellers. Journal of Travel Medicine 25:S3–S9. pmid:29718434
  10. 10. Sumiyoshi H, Mori C, Fuke I, Morita K, Kuhara S, Kondou J, Kikuchi Y, Nagamatu H, Igarashi A. 1987. Complete nucleotide sequence of the Japanese encephalitis virus genome RNA. Virology 161:497–510. pmid:3686827
  11. 11. Chambers TJ, Hahn CS, Galler R, Rice CM. 1990. Flavivirus Genome Organization, Expression, and Replication. Annual Review of Microbiology 44:649–688. pmid:2174669
  12. 12. Mason RA, Tauraso NM, Spertzel RO, Ginn RK. 1973. Yellow Fever Vaccine: Direct Challenge of Monkeys Given Graded Doses of 17D Vaccine. Applied Microbiology 25:539–544. pmid:4633476
  13. 13. Rastogi M, Sharma N, Singh SK. 2016. Flavivirus NS1: a multifaceted enigmatic viral protein. Virology Journal 13:131. pmid:27473856
  14. 14. Leung JY, Pijlman GP, Kondratieva N, Hyde J, Mackenzie JM, Khromykh AA. 2008. Role of Nonstructural Protein NS2A in Flavivirus Assembly. Journal of Virology 82:4731–4741. pmid:18337583
  15. 15. Mackenzie JM, Khromykh AA, Jones MK, Westaway EG. 1998. Subcellular localization and some biochemical properties of the flavivirus Kunjin nonstructural proteins NS2A and NS4A. Virology 245:203–215. pmid:9636360
  16. 16. Wahaab A, Mustafa BE, Hameed M, Stevenson NJ, Anwar MN, Liu K, Wei J, Qiu Y, Ma Z. 2021. Potential Role of Flavivirus NS2B-NS3 Proteases in Viral Pathogenesis and Anti-flavivirus Drug Discovery Employing Animal Cells and Models: A Review. Viruses 14:44. pmid:35062249
  17. 17. Luo D, Xu T, Watson RP, Scherer-Becker D, Sampath A, Jahnke W, Yeong SS, Wang CH, Lim SP, Strongin A, Vasudevan SG, Lescar J. 2008. Insights into RNA unwinding and ATP hydrolysis by the flavivirus NS3 protein. The EMBO Journal 27:3209–3219. pmid:19008861
  18. 18. Wang C-C, Huang Z-S, Chiang P-L, Chen C-T, Wu H-N. 2009. Analysis of the nucleoside triphosphatase, RNA triphosphatase, and unwinding activities of the helicase domain of dengue virus NS3 protein. FEBS Letters 583:691–696. pmid:19166847
  19. 19. Lindenbach BD, Rice CM. 1999. Genetic Interaction of Flavivirus Nonstructural Proteins NS1 and NS4A as a Determinant of Replicase Function. Journal of Virology 73:4611–4621. pmid:10233920
  20. 20. McLean JE, Wudzinska A, Datan E, Quaglino D, Zakeri Z. 2011. Flavivirus NS4A-induced Autophagy Protects Cells against Death and Enhances Virus Replication *. Journal of Biological Chemistry 286:22147–22159. pmid:21511946
  21. 21. Zou G, Puig-Basagoiti F, Zhang B, Qing M, Chen L, Pankiewicz KW, Felczak K, Yuan Z, Shi P-Y. 2009. A single-amino acid substitution in West Nile virus 2K peptide between NS4A and NS4B confers resistance to lycorine, a flavivirus inhibitor. Virology 384:242–252. pmid:19062063
  22. 22. Zmurko J, Neyts J, Dallmeier K. 2015. Flaviviral NS4b, chameleon and jack-in-the-box roles in viral replication and pathogenesis, and a molecular target for antiviral intervention. Reviews in Medical Virology 25:205–223. pmid:25828437
  23. 23. Best SM. 2017. The Many Faces of the Flavivirus NS5 Protein in Antagonism of Type I Interferon Signaling. Journal of Virology 91:e01970–16. pmid:27881649
  24. 24. Saeedi BJ, Geiss BJ. 2013. Regulation of flavivirus RNA synthesis and capping. WIREs RNA 4:723–735. pmid:23929625
  25. 25. Schuh AJ, Guzman H, Tesh RB, Barrett ADT. 2013. Genetic Diversity of Japanese Encephalitis Virus Isolates Obtained from the Indonesian Archipelago Between 1974 and 1987. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 13:479–488. pmid:23590316
  26. 26. Gao X, Liu H, Li M, Fu S, Liang G. 2015. Insights into the evolutionary history of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) based on whole-genome sequences comprising the five genotypes. Virology Journal 12:43. pmid:25884184
  27. 27. Han N, Adams J, Chen P, Guo Z, Zhong X, Fang W, Li N, Wen L, Tao X, Yuan Z, Rayner S. 2014. Comparison of Genotypes I and III in Japanese Encephalitis Virus Reveals Distinct Differences in Their Genetic and Host Diversity. Journal of Virology 88:11469–11479. pmid:25056890
  28. 28. Mackenzie JS, Williams DT. 2022. Japanese encephalitis virus: an emerging and re-emerging virus in Australia. Microbiol Aust 43:150–155.
  29. 29. Mackenzie JS, Williams DT, van den Hurk AF, Smith DW, Currie BJ. 2022. Japanese Encephalitis Virus: The Emergence of Genotype IV in Australia and Its Potential Endemicity. Viruses 14:2480. pmid:36366578
  30. 30. Williams CR, Webb CE, Higgs S, van den Hurk AF. 2022. Japanese Encephalitis Virus Emergence in Australia: Public Health Importance and Implications for Future Surveillance. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 22:529–534. pmid:36354964
  31. 31. Morita K, Nabeshima T, Buerano CC. 2015. Japanese encephalitis. Rev Sci Tech 34:441–452. pmid:26601447
  32. 32. Cao L, Fu S, Gao X, Li M, Cui S, Li X, Cao Y, Lei W, Lu Z, He Y, Wang H, Yan J, Gao GF, Liang G. 2016. Low Protective Efficacy of the Current Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine against the Emerging Genotype 5 Japanese Encephalitis Virus. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10:e0004686. pmid:27139722
  33. 33. Erra EO, Askling HH, Yoksan S, Rombo L, Riutta J, Vene S, Lindquist L, Vapalahti O, Kantele A. 2013. Cross-Protective Capacity of Japanese Encephalitis (JE) Vaccines Against Circulating Heterologous JE Virus Genotypes. Clinical Infectious Diseases 56:267–270. pmid:23074319
  34. 34. Bonaparte M, Dweik B, Feroldi E, Meric C, Bouckenooghe A, Hildreth S, Hu B, Yoksan S, Boaz M. 2014. Immune response to live-attenuated Japanese encephalitis vaccine (JE-CV) neutralizes Japanese encephalitis virus isolates from South-East Asia and India. BMC Infect Dis 14:156. pmid:24656175
  35. 35. Mulvey P, Duong V, Boyer S, Burgess G, Williams DT, Dussart P, Horwood PF. 2021. The Ecology and Evolution of Japanese Encephalitis Virus. 12. Pathogens 10:1534.
  36. 36. Pearce JC, Learoyd TP, Langendorf BJ, Logan JG. 2018. Japanese encephalitis: the vectors, ecology and potential for expansion. Journal of Travel Medicine 25:S16–S26. pmid:29718435
  37. 37. Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M, on behalf of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. 2011. The Sequence Read Archive. Nucleic Acids Research 39:D19–D21. pmid:21062823
  38. 38. Sayers EW, Beck J, Bolton EE, Bourexis D, Brister JR, Canese K, Comeau DC, Funk K, Kim S, Klimke W, Marchler-Bauer A, Landrum M, Lathrop S, Lu Z, Madden TL, O’Leary N, Phan L, Rangwala SH, Schneider VA, Skripchenko Y, Wang J, Ye J, Trawick BW, Pruitt KD, Sherry ST. 2020. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D10–D17. pmid:31602479
  39. 39. Tateno Y, Imanishi T, Miyazaki S, Fukami-Kobayashi K, Saitou N, Sugawara H, Gojobori T. 2002. DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) for genome scale research in life science. Nucleic Acids Research 30:27–30. pmid:11752245
  40. 40. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data | Bioinformatics | Oxford Academic. https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/30/15/2114/2390096?login=true. Retrieved 9 January 2023.
  41. 41. Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM
  42. 42. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, Whitwham A, Keane T, McCarthy SA, Davies RM, Li H. 2021. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10:giab008. pmid:33590861
  43. 43. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32:1792–1797. pmid:15034147
  44. 44. Martin DP, Varsani A, Roumagnac P, Botha G, Maslamoney S, Schwab T, Kelz Z, Kumar V, Murrell B. 2021. RDP5: a computer program for analyzing recombination in, and removing signals of recombination from, nucleotide sequence datasets. Virus Evolution 7:veaa087. pmid:33936774
  45. 45. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. pmid:24451623
  46. 46. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25:1253–1256. pmid:18397919
  47. 47. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A. 2017. DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34:3299–3302. pmid:29029172
  48. 48. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38:3022–3027. pmid:33892491
  49. 49. Kosakovsky Pond SL, Poon AFY, Velazquez R, Weaver S, Hepler NL, Murrell B, Shank SD, Magalis BR, Bouvier D, Nekrutenko A, Wisotsky S, Spielman SJ, Frost SDW, Muse SV. 2020. HyPhy 2.5—A Customizable Platform for Evolutionary Hypothesis Testing Using Phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37:295–299. pmid:31504749
  50. 50. Murrell B, Weaver S, Smith MD, Wertheim JO, Murrell S, Aylward A, Eren K, Pollner T, Martin DP, Smith DM, Scheffler K, Kosakovsky Pond SL. 2015. Gene-Wide Identification of Episodic Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32:1365–1371. pmid:25701167
  51. 51. Murrell B, Wertheim JO, Moola S, Weighill T, Scheffler K, Pond SLK. 2012. Detecting Individual Sites Subject to Episodic Diversifying Selection. PLOS Genetics 8:e1002764. pmid:22807683
  52. 52. Lewis-Rogers N, McClellan DA, Crandall KA. 2008. The evolution of foot-and-mouth disease virus: Impacts of recombination and selection. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 8:786–798. pmid:18718559
  53. 53. Palomino-Tapia V, Mitevski D, Inglis T, van der Meer F, Martin E, Brash M, Provost C, Gagnon CA, Abdul-Careem MF. 2020. Chicken Astrovirus (CAstV) Molecular Studies Reveal Evidence of Multiple Past Recombination Events in Sequences Originated from Clinical Samples of White Chick Syndrome (WCS) in Western Canada. 10. Viruses 12:1096.
  54. 54. Gámbaro F, Pérez AB, Agüera E, Prot M, Martínez-Martínez L, Cabrerizo M, Simon-Loriere E, Fernandez-Garcia MD. 2021. Genomic surveillance of enterovirus associated with aseptic meningitis cases in southern Spain, 2015–2018. 1. Sci Rep 11:21523.
  55. 55. Weaver SC, Forrester NL, Liu J, Vasilakis N. 2021. Population bottlenecks and founder effects: implications for mosquito-borne arboviral emergence. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:184–195. pmid:33432235
  56. 56. Why do RNA viruses recombine? | Nature Reviews Microbiology. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro2614. Retrieved 9 January 2023.
  57. 57. McGee CE, Tsetsarkin KA, Guy B, Lang J, Plante K, Vanlandingham DL, Higgs S. 2011. Stability of Yellow Fever Virus under Recombinatory Pressure as Compared with Chikungunya Virus. PLOS ONE 6:e23247. pmid:21826243
  58. 58. Li F, Feng Y, Wang G, Zhang W, Fu S, Wang Z, Yin Q, Nie K, Yan J, Deng X, He Y, Liang L, Xu S, Wang Z, Liang G, Wang H. 2023. Tracing the spatiotemporal phylodynamics of Japanese encephalitis virus genotype I throughout Asia and the western Pacific. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 17:e0011192. pmid:37053286
  59. 59. Lee A-R, Song JM, Seo S-U. 2022. Emerging Japanese Encephalitis Virus Genotype V in Republic of Korea. J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:955–959. pmid:35879275
  60. 60. Gao X, Liu H, Li X, Fu S, Cao L, Shao N, Zhang W, Wang Q, Lu Z, Lei W, He Y, Cao Y, Wang H, Liang G. 2019. Changing Geographic Distribution of Japanese Encephalitis Virus Genotypes, 1935–2017. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 19:35–44. pmid:30207876
  61. 61. Goldhill D, Lee A, Williams ESCP, Turner PE. 2014. Evolvability and robustness in populations of RNA virus Φ6. Front Microbiol 5:35.
  62. 62. Singhal S, Leon Guerrero CM, Whang SG, McClure EM, Busch HG, Kerr B. 2017. Adaptations of an RNA virus to increasing thermal stress. PLoS One 12:e0189602. pmid:29267297
  63. 63. Wu K-P, Wu C-W, Tsao Y-P, Kuo T-W, Lou Y-C, Lin C-W, Wu S-C, Cheng J-W. 2003. Structural Basis of a Flavivirus Recognized by Its Neutralizing Antibody: SOLUTION STRUCTURE OF THE DOMAIN III OF THE JAPANESE ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS ENVELOPE PROTEIN *. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:46007–46013. pmid:12952958
  64. 64. Zhang X, Jia R, Shen H, Wang M, Yin Z, Cheng A. 2017. Structures and Functions of the Envelope Glycoprotein in Flavivirus Infections. 11. Viruses 9:338.
  65. 65. Zhao Z, Date T, Li Y, Kato T, Miyamoto M, Yasui K, Wakita T. 2005. Characterization of the E-138 (Glu/Lys) mutation in Japanese encephalitis virus by using a stable, full-length, infectious cDNA clone. Journal of General Virology 86:2209–2220. pmid:16033968
  66. 66. Yang J, Yang H, Li Z, Wang W, Lin H, Liu L, Ni Q, Liu X, Zeng X, Wu Y, Li Y. 2017. Envelope Protein Mutations L107F and E138K Are Important for Neurovirulence Attenuation for Japanese Encephalitis Virus SA14-14-2 Strain. 1. Viruses 9:20
  67. 67. Hanna SL, Pierson TC, Sanchez MD, Ahmed AA, Murtadha MM, Doms RW. 2005. N-Linked Glycosylation of West Nile Virus Envelope Proteins Influences Particle Assembly and Infectivity. Journal of Virology 79:13262–13274. pmid:16227249
  68. 68. Beasley DWC, Whiteman MC, Zhang S, Huang CY-H, Schneider BS, Smith DR, Gromowski GD, Higgs S, Kinney RM, Barrett ADT. 2005. Envelope Protein Glycosylation Status Influences Mouse Neuroinvasion Phenotype of Genetic Lineage 1 West Nile Virus Strains. Journal of Virology 79:8339–8347. pmid:15956579
  69. 69. Xiong J, Yan M, Zhu S, Zheng B, Wei N, Yang L, Si Y, Cao S, Ye J. 2022. Increased Cleavage of Japanese Encephalitis Virus prM Protein Promotes Viral Replication but Attenuates Virulence. Microbiology Spectrum 10:e01417–22. pmid:35695552
  70. 70. Xie X, Gayen S, Kang C, Yuan Z, Shi P-Y. 2013. Membrane Topology and Function of Dengue Virus NS2A Protein. Journal of Virology 87:4609–4622. pmid:23408612
  71. 71. Wu R-H, Tsai M-H, Tsai K-N, Tian JN, Wu J-S, Wu S-Y, Chern J-H, Chen C-H, Yueh A. 2017. Mutagenesis of Dengue Virus Protein NS2A Revealed a Novel Domain Responsible for Virus-Induced Cytopathic Effect and Interactions between NS2A and NS2B Transmembrane Segments. Journal of Virology 91: pmid:28381578
  72. 72. Fan Y-C, Liang J-J, Chen J-M, Lin J-W, Chen Y-Y, Su K-H, Lin C-C, Tu W-C, Chiou M-T, Ou S-C, Chang G-JJ, Lin Y-L, Chiou S-S. 2019. NS2B/NS3 mutations enhance the infectivity of genotype I Japanese encephalitis virus in amplifying hosts. PLOS Pathogens 15:e1007992. pmid:31381617
  73. 73. Kao Y-T, Chang B-L, Liang J-J, Tsai H-J, Lee Y-L, Lin R-J, Lin Y-L. 2015. Japanese Encephalitis Virus Nonstructural Protein NS5 Interacts with Mitochondrial Trifunctional Protein and Impairs Fatty Acid β-Oxidation. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004750.
  74. 74. Li C, Di D, Huang H, Wang X, Xia Q, Ma X, Liu K, Li B, Shao D, Qiu Y, Li Z, Wei J, Ma Z. 2020. NS5-V372A and NS5-H386Y variations are responsible for differences in interferon α/β induction and co-contribute to the replication advantage of Japanese encephalitis virus genotype I over genotype III in ducklings. PLOS Pathogens 16:e1008773.
  75. 75. Twiddy SS, Holmes EC. 2003. The extent of homologous recombination in members of the genus Flavivirus. Journal of General Virology 84:429–440. pmid:12560576
  76. 76. Carney J, Daly JM, Nisalak A, Solomon T. 2012. Recombination and positive selection identified in complete genome sequences of Japanese encephalitis virus. Arch Virol 157:75–8377. pmid:22033595
  77. 77. Schuh AJ, Ward MJ, Leigh Brown AJ, Barrett ADT. 2013. Phylogeography of Japanese Encephalitis Virus: Genotype Is Associated with Climate. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2411. pmid:24009790
  78. 78. Clark JJ, Gilray J, Orton RJ, Baird M, Wilkie G, Filipe A da S, Johnson N, McInnes CJ, Kohl A, Biek R. 2020. Population genomics of louping ill virus provide new insights into the evolution of tick-borne flaviviruses. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14:e0008133. pmid:32925939