Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Following successful anti-leishmanial treatment, neutrophil counts, CD10 expression and phagocytic capacity remain reduced in visceral leishmaniasis patients co-infected with HIV

  • Yegnasew Takele,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, Leishmaniasis Research and Treatment Centre, University of Gondar, Ethiopia

  • Emebet Adem,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: University of Greenwich at Medway, Kent, United Kingdom

    Affiliation Leishmaniasis Research and Treatment Centre, University of Gondar, Ethiopia

  • Tadele Mulaw,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Leishmaniasis Research and Treatment Centre, University of Gondar, Ethiopia

  • Ingrid Müller,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

  • James Anthony Cotton,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom

  • Pascale Kropf

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    p.kropf@imperial.ac.uk

    Affiliation Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) patients co-infected with HIV (VL/HIV patients) experience frequent treatment failures, VL relapses, opportunistic infections, and higher mortality. Their immune system remains profoundly suppressed after clinical cure and they maintain higher parasite load. This is in contrast with patients with VL alone (VL patients). Since neutrophils play a critical role in the control of Leishmania replication and the regulation of immune responses, we tested the hypothesis that neutrophil activation status and effector functions are fully restored in VL, but not in VL/HIV patients. Our results show the neutrophil counts and all activation markers and effector functions tested in our study were reduced at the time of diagnosis in VL and VL/HIV patients as compared to controls. CD62L, CD63, arginase 1 expression levels and reactive oxygen species production were restored at the end of treatment in both groups. However, neutrophil counts, CD10 expression and phagocytosis remained significantly lower throughout follow-up in VL/HIV patients; suggesting that dysregulated neutrophils contribute to the impaired host defence against pathogens in VL/HIV patients.

Author summary

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a neglected tropical disease that affects the most vulnerable people in low and middle-income countries. It is caused by Leishmania parasites. VL can be fatal, however there are efficient treatments to control this disease. In contrast, patients with visceral leishmaniasis (VL patients) who are co-infected with HIV (VL/HIV patients), they harbour a higher parasite load and suffer from treatment failure and frequent relapses. In this study, we analysed the effector functions of neutrophils, a type of blood cells that has the ability to take up Leishmania parasites and kill them. We show that over time in VL/HIV patients, the neutrophil counts remain significantly lower as compared to VL patients and healthy controls and they also display an impaired capacity to phagocytose. These results suggest that dysregulated neutrophils contribute to the impaired control of parasite replication in VL/HIV patients.

Introduction

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a neglected tropical disease, affecting the poorest populations. Worldwide, 78 countries are endemic for VL with 17,082 new cases reported in 2018 [1]. Due to the poor surveillance of this disease, it is generally accepted that this number is a substantial underestimate of the real burden of VL. This disease is caused by infections with parasites of the Leishmania (L.) donovani species complex. The parasites are transmitted to the hosts during the blood meal of sandfly vectors. In Ethiopia, VL is one of the most important vector-born disease, with >3 millions of individuals living in areas that are endemic for this disease [2]. Whereas most individuals infected with L. donovani will stay asymptomatic, a small percentage will develop VL. VL is characterised by fever, hepatosplenomegaly, wasting and pancytopenia; this stage of the disease is often fatal if not treated.

HIV co-infection of VL patients is one of the major challenges for the control of VL: HIV infection increases the risk of progression from asymptomatic Leishmania infection to VL and VL accelerates HIV disease progression. Ethiopia is the country is Africa with the highest rate of VL/HIV co-infections, with up to 23% of VL patients co-infected with HIV [3]. As compared to VL patients, VL/HIV patients experience more frequent treatment failures and VL relapses and higher mortality, as well as more opportunistic infections [46]. The mechanisms accounting for the increased rate of VL relapse in VL/HIV co-infected patients are poorly characterised. Markers such as low CD4+ T cell counts, high parasite loads at the time of VL diagnosis and during follow-up, not being on ART at the time of VL diagnosis and antigenuria have shown variable degrees of predictive accuracy [710]. Another predictive marker of VL relapse in VL/HIV co-infected patients is a previous history of VL relapse [11], though this has led to conflicting results: a study by Abongomera et al. showed no association between a previous history of relapse and increased risks of future relapse [12]. We recently showed that in Northwest Ethiopia, 78.1% of VL/HIV patients experienced at least one episode of VL relapse over a period of three years. Importantly, we showed that despite clinical cure, VL/HIV patients maintained high parasite loads, failed to restore both CD4+ T cell counts and antigen-specific IFNγ production and maintain higher expression of PD1 on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. We also showed that in the plasma of VL/HIV patients, proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IL-8 and IL-6 remained high throughout follow-up [13]. Neutrophils are amongst the first cells to be recruited to sites of inflammation, where they are one of the main mediators of inflammation. While this can sometimes result in tissue injury, neutrophils also play a key role in the resolution of inflammation [1417]. In addition, neutrophils can eliminate pathogens via several mechanisms such as phagocytosis, production of toxic molecules such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), anti-bacterial proteins, and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [1417]. Interestingly, phagocytosis of different Leishmania species does not always result in the killing of the parasites [18]. L. donovani can be phagocytosed and killed by human neutrophils [19], but can survive in NETs in vitro [20]. A recent study showed that infection of human neutrophils with L. donovani resulted in increased glycolysis that seems to contribute to parasite survival, since inhibition of glycolysis resulted in lower parasite load [21]. Exposure to ATP and UTP has been shown to enhance anti-Leishmania activity [21]. L. donovani can also induce autophagy in neutrophils, that in turn can facilitate their silent entry into macrophages [22]. In addition, Leishmania-containing phagosomes in neutrophils have been shown to avoid fusion with the granules involved in acidification of vacuoles, thereby contributing to parasite survival [23].

We have shown that in VL patients, a high proportion of neutrophils are immature, highly activated and display impaired effector functions [24]. A limited number of studies have analysed the role of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of human VL, but those performed with VL/HIV co-infected patients are particularly sparse; therefore, the role of neutrophils in the poor of clinical outcome or VL/HIV patients is still unclear. Here, our aim was to test the hypothesis that after successful anti-leishmanial treatment, neutrophil activation status and effector functions are fully restored over time in VL, but not in VL/HIV patients.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Gondar (IRB, reference O/V/P/RCS/05/1572/2017), the National Research Ethics Review Committee (NRERC, reference 310/130/2018) and Imperial College Research Ethics Committee (ICREC 17SM480). Informed written consent was obtained from each patient and control.

Patient recruitment

For this cross-sectional study, we used the three cohorts of individuals described in [13]; in brief, we recruited 25 healthy male non-endemic controls (median age 28.0 years (24.5–35.0)), 50 male patients with visceral leishmaniasis (VL patients, median age 25 years (20.0–29.8)) and 49 VL patients co-infected with HIV (VL/HIV patients, median age 33.5 years (28.0–38.8)) from the Leishmaniasis Research and Treatment Centre (LRTC), University of Gondar, Ethiopia. Patients age <18 years were excluded. VL and HIV diagnosis and treatments were all performed according to national guidelines in Ethiopia [25,26]. 46 VL/HIV patients were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the time of VL diagnosis, the remaining three started ART at the end of the anti-leishmanial treatment. At the end of treatment, all VL patients were clinically cured, as defined by the National Guidelines [25]: patients look improved, were afebrile, usually have a smaller spleen size and had an improved haematological profile. A test of cure was used for VL/HIV patients to decide if they could be discharged from hospital; a negative test of cure is defined in the National Guidelines [25] as follows: patients look improved, afebrile, and usually have a smaller spleen size, parasitological cure (absence of amastigotes in splenic aspirates) and an improved haematological profile. When the test of cure was still positive, treatment was continued until it became negative.

Anti-leishmanial treatments and duration, HIV treatments, number and time of VL relapses and clinical parameters have been described in [13].

VL and VL/HIV patients were recruited at four different time points: time of diagnosis (ToD); end of treatment (EoT); 3 months post the end of treatment (3m); and 6–12 months post the end of treatment (6-12m).

Sample collection and processing

7.5ml of blood were collected and distributes as follows:

  • 2.5ml in EDTA tubes for neutrophil counts.
  • 5ml in heparin tubes for neutrophil isolation.

Neutrophil counts were measured as part of the complete blood cell counts using a Sysmex XP-300 automated haematology analyser, (USA) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Eightcheck-3wp (USA) control samples were tested before running the patient samples.

Neutrophils were isolated as described in [27]. Briefly, following density gradient centrifugation on HistopaqueH-1077 (Sigma), the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet (containing erythrocytes and neutrophils) was resuspended in PBS; 3% dextran sulfate was added, and the tube was left to stand for 20min at room temperature to allow for erythrocyte sedimentation. The supernatant was collected, washed, and suspended in red cell lysis buffer and incubated at 4°C for 15min. The suspension was washed with PBS and the neutrophil sediment was resuspended in PBS.

Flowcytometry

The following antibodies were used: anti-human CD62LPE/Cy7 (DREG-56), anti-human CD15APC (H198), anti-human CD10FITC (eBioSN5c), anti-human CD63PE/Cy7 (H5C6) (eBiosciences) and anti-human arginase 1PE (14D2C43) (BioLegend).

For intracellular staining of arginase 1, cells were permeabilized with 0.25% saponin for 15min at room temperature in the dark and washed with PBS. Anti-arginase-1 was added and incubated for 15min. Cells were then washed with PBS, resuspended in 300ul of PBS and analysed immediately on the flow cytometer.

Phagocytosis of E. coli bioparticles

Uptake of pHrodo Green Escherichia coli BioParticles Conjugate (Molecular probe) was used to assess the phagocytic capacity of neutrophils, as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. Purified neutrophils were re-suspended in 10% RPMI at a concentration 1x105 cells and E. coli particles were added at a 1:10 ratio. Cells were then incubated at 37°C for 1hour. At the end of incubation cells were washed, resuspended in PBS and analysed immediately on the flow cytometer.

Reactive oxygen species

Total ROS detection kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.) was used to evaluate the production of ROS by neutrophils, as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. 1x105 neutrophils were incubated in 0.1% complete RPMI at 37°C, 5% CO2 in the presence and absence of 200μM of pyocyanin (PYO) for 60min. Cells were then washed in PBS at 1200rpm, 500μl of detection reagent was added and the cells were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 30min, CD15 was added during the last 15min of incubation and at the end of the incubation, the cells were analysed immediately on the flow cytometer.

Acquisition was performed by using a BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data analysed using BD Accuri C6 analysis software version 1.0.264.21.2.6.2.3.

Statistical analysis

Data were evaluated for statistical differences as specified in the legend of each figure. The following tests were used: Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests. Differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05. Results are expressed as median with interquartile range. * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01, *** = p<0.001 and **** = p<0.0001.

Results

We first compared neutrophil counts in the blood of VL and VL/HIV patients over time. As shown in Fig 1A and Table 1, neutrophil counts were significantly lower in both groups as compared to controls at ToD. In VL patients, these counts stayed similar at EoT, but increased significantly at 3m and were restored 6-12m post the end of treatment (Fig 1A). In VL/HIV patients, despite an increase in neutrophil counts at EoT, these numbers stayed significantly lower until the end of follow-up. We have previously shown that following successful clinical cure, no VL patients experienced VL relapse, but that 78.1% of VL/HIV patients relapse at least once [13]. We therefore measured neutrophil counts in VL/HIV patients who relapsed during follow-up and compared them with those who did not; our results show a significantly higher number of neutrophils in the latter group (Fig 1B). However, the median neutrophil count of VL/HIV patients who did not relapse (2330 neutrophils/μl of blood [1560–2895]) was still significantly lower (p = 0.0001) as compared to controls (3300 neutrophils/μl of blood [2500–4750]).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Comparison of neutrophil counts between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

Neutrophil counts were measured in the whole blood of controls (n = 25), VL (ToD: n = 41, EoT: n = 42; 3m: n = 34, 6-12m: n = 22) and VL/HIV (ToD: n = 37, EoT: n = 36, 3m: n = 37, 6-12m: n = 20) patients as described in Material and Methods. A. Comparison of neutrophil counts over time in VL, VL/HIV and controls. B. Comparison of neutrophil counts from VL/HIV patients who did not relapse (n = 39) and those who relapsed (n = 23) after successful anti-leishmanial treatment, during the 3m and 6–12 follow-up period. If a patient did not relapse during the two-time points of follow-up and if a patient relapsed at both 3 and 6–12 months, this is represented as 2 measurements. Each symbol represents the value for one individual. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Statistical differences between VL and VL/HIV patients at each time point or between VL/HIV patients who did not relapse and those who relapsed were determined using a Mann-Whitney test and statistical differences between the 4 different time points for each cohort of patients were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test. ToD = Time of Diagnosis; EoT = End of Treatment; 3m = 3 months post EoT; 6-12m = 6–12 months post EoT. ns = not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. Comparison of neutrophil counts between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.t001

Next we evaluated neutrophil activation status in VL and VL/HIV patients over time. Results presented in Fig 2A show that the levels of CD63, a molecule that becomes upregulated on neutrophil cell surface following activation [28], were higher on neutrophils from VL and VL/HIV as compared to controls (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0310, respectively, Table 2) at ToD. CD63 Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) decreased at EoT in both groups, although not significantly in the VL/HIV patients and were restored to levels similar to those of control (Fig 2A, Table 2). There were no significant differences (p = 0.7473) in CD63 MFI between VL/HIV patients (7345 [6899–9962]) who relapsed and those who didn’t (8354 [6683–10052]).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Comparison of neutrophil CD63, CD62L and arginase 1 expression levels between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

Neutrophils were isolated from whole blood by dextran sedimentation as described ibn Materials and Methods: A. The expression levels (MFI = Median Fluorescence Intensity) of CD63 expression levels were measured on neutrophils from controls (n = 12), VL (ToD: n = 26, EoT: n = 14 3m: n = 22, 6-12m: n = 18) and VL/HIV (ToD: n = 18, EoT: n = 14, 3m: n = 15, 6-12m: n = 11) patients by flow cytometry as described in Materials and Methods. B. The expression levels (MFI) of CD62L expression levels were measured on neutrophils from controls (n = 18), VL (ToD: n = 25, EoT: n = 19 3m: n = 24, 6-12m: n = 34) and VL/HIV (ToD: n = 27, EoT: n = 25, 3m: n = 18, 6-12m: n = 23) patients by flow cytometry as described in Materials and Methods; C. The intracellular expression levels (MFI) of Arginase 1 levels were measured in neutrophils from controls (n = 11), VL (ToD: n = 23, EoT: n = 11, 3m: n = 14, 6-12m: n = 17) and VL/HIV (ToD: n = 15, EoT: n = 9, 3m: n = 9, 6-12m: n = 11) patients by flow cytometry as described in Materials and Methods. Each symbol represents the value for one individual. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Statistical differences between VL and VL/HIV patients at each time point were determined using a Mann-Whitney test and statistical differences between the 4 different time points for each cohort of patients were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test. ToD = Time of Diagnosis; EoT = End of Treatment; 3m = 3 months post EoT; 6-12m = 6–12 months post EoT. ns = not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Comparison of neutrophil CD63 expression levels between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.t002

Next we measured the expression levels of CD62L, a ligand that is shed from the neutrophil cell surface following activation [29,30]. CD62L MFI were lower on neutrophils from VL and VL/HIV patients as compared to controls (Fig 2B; p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0016, respectively, Table 3) at ToD; CD62L MFI were restored to levels similar to those of controls at EoT in both groups (Fig 2B, Table 3). There were no significant differences (p = 0.1750) in CD62L MFI between VL/HIV patients who relapsed (13380 [7986–17068]) and those who didn’t (10022 [7155–13582]).

thumbnail
Table 3. Comparison of neutrophil CD62L expression levels between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.t003

Arginase 1 is an enzyme present in the primary granules of neutrophils that has immunomodulatory properties [24,31]. Here we show that the levels of arginase 1 were significantly lower in both VL and VL/HIV patients at ToD as compared to controls (p<0.0001 and p = 0.0196, respectively, Fig 2C, Table 4). These levels increased after treatment, however not significantly in the VL/HIV group, and were restored to levels similar to those of controls at EoT in both groups (Fig 2C, Table 4). There were no significant differences (p = 0.7959) in arginase 1 MFI between VL/HIV patients who relapsed (19755 [14817–25017]) and those who didn’t (21286 [12894–26922]).

thumbnail
Table 4. Comparison of neutrophil Arginase 1 expression levels between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.t004

We also measured the levels of CD10, a molecule present only on segmented neutrophils [29], that can regulate both inflammatory processes [32] and T cell effector functions [33]. Results presented in Fig 3A show that CD10 is significantly lower in both groups at ToD as compared to controls (p<0.0001, Table 5). CD10 expression increased at EoT in VL patients and was restored at 3m (Fig 3A, Table 5). In contrast, in VL/HIV patients, CD10 levels remained similar at EoT, and only increased marginally over time. CD10 expression on neutrophils was also significantly higher in VL/HIV patients who did not relapse over time (Fig 3B). But still remained significantly lower (p = 0.0406) as compared to controls (15887 [13445–19799] and (14653 [11599–16298], respectively).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Comparison of neutrophil CD10 expression levels between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

Neutrophils were isolated from whole blood by dextran sedimentation and the expression levels (MFI = Median Fluorescence Intensity) of CD10 were measured by flow cytometry on neutrophils from controls (n = 18), VL (ToD: n = 26, EoT: n = 19, 3m: n = 25, 6-12m: n = 29) and VL/HIV (ToD: n = 27, EoT: n = 26, 3m: n = 19, 6-12m: n = 22) patients as described in Materials and Methods. A. Comparison of CD10 MFI on neutrophils from VL, VL/HIV and controls patients over time. B. Comparison of CD10 MFI on neutrophils from VL/HIV patients who did not relapse (n = 30) and those who relapsed (n = 20) after successful anti-leishmanial treatment, during the 3m and 6–12 follow-up period. If a patient did not relapse during the two-time points of follow-up and if a patient relapsed at both 3 and 6–12 months, this is represented as 2 measurements. Each symbol represents the value for one individual. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Statistical differences between VL and VL/HIV patients at each time point or between VL/HIV patients who did not relapse and those who relapsed were determined using a Mann-Whitney test and statistical differences between the 4 different time points for each cohort of patients were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test. ToD = Time of Diagnosis; EoT = End of Treatment; 3m = 3 months post EoT; 6-12m = 6–12 months post EoT. ns = not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.g003

thumbnail
Table 5. Comparison of neutrophil CD10 expression level between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.t005

Next we assessed two effector functions of neutrophils, ROS production and phagocytosis. As shown in S1 Fig, the median ROS production by neutrophils from both groups of patients was significantly increased in response to pyocyanin at all time points. Results in Fig 4 show that the capacity of neutrophils to produce ROS in response to pyocyanin was significantly impaired at ToD in VL and VL/HIV patients as compared to controls (p = 0.0008 and p = 0.0011, respectively, Table 6). It remained significantly lower as compared to controls in VL patients at EoT and 3m but was restored at 6-12m (Table 6). ROS production was already restored at EoT (Fig 4, Table 6) in VL/HIV patients. The ability of neutrophils to produce ROS was similar (p = 0.1777) in VL/HIV patients who relapse (206464 [119571]) and those who didn’t relapse during follow-up (227781 [155669–259241]).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Comparison of ROS production by neutrophils between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

Neutrophils were isolated by dextran sedimentation from the blood of controls (n = 15), VL (ToD: n = 28, EoT: n = 20, 3m: n = 25, 6-12m: n = 33) and VL/HIV (ToD: n = 22, EoT: n = 27, 3m: n = 19, 6-12m: n = 23) patients and incubated in the presence or absence of pyocyanin. The production of ROS was evaluated by subtracting the MFI obtained from the neutrophils incubated without pyocyanin (baseline) from those incubated in the presence of pyocyanin, as measured by flow cytometry. Each symbol represents the value for one individual. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Statistical differences between VL and VL/HIV patients at each time point were determined using a Mann-Whitney test and statistical differences between the 4 different time points for each cohort of patients were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test. ToD = Time of Diagnosis; EoT = End of Treatment; 3m = 3 months post EoT; 6-12m = 6–12 months post EoT. ns = not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.g004

thumbnail
Table 6. Comparison of ROS production by neutrophils between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.t006

Next we measured the capacity of neutrophils to phagocytose E. coli bioparticles. As shown in Fig 5, at ToD phagocytosis was significantly impaired in VL and VL/HIV patients (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.0003, respectively, Table 7). This was restored to levels similar to those of controls at EoT in VL patients, but remained impaired at all time points in VL/HIV patients (Table 7). In the latter group, the ability of neutrophils to phagocytose bioparticle was similarly impaired in patients who relapse and those who didn’t during follow-up (Fig 5B, Table 7).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Comparison of bioparticle phagocytosis between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

Neutrophils were isolated by dextran sedimentation from the blood of controls (n = 15), VL (ToD: n = 14, EoT: n = 14, 3m: n = 13, 6-12m: n = 27) and VL/HIV (ToD: n = 16, EoT: n = 24, 3m: n = 15, 6-12m: n = 26) patient and the MFI of E. coli particles were measured by flow cytometry, as described in Materials and Methods. Each symbol represents the value for one individual. A. Comparison of bioparticle phagocytosis by neutrophils from VL, VL/HIV and controls patients over time. B. Comparison of bioparticle phagocytosis by neutrophils from VL/HIV patients who did not relapse (n = 22) and those who relapsed (n = 19) after successful anti-leishmanial treatment, during the 3m and 6–12 follow-up period. If a patient did not relapse during the two-time points of follow-up and if a patient relapsed at both 3 and 6–12 months, this is represented as 2 measurements. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Statistical differences between VL and VL/HIV patients at each time point or between VL/HIV patients who did not relapse and those who relapsed were determined using a Mann-Whitney test and statistical differences between the 4 different time points for each cohort of patients were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test. ToD = Time of Diagnosis; EoT = End of Treatment; 3m = 3 months post EoT; 6-12m = 6–12 months post EoT. ns = not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.g005

thumbnail
Table 7. Comparison of phagocytosis between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.t007

Discussion

Neutrophils are the most abundant cells in the blood and play major roles in several aspects of the immune response. They are rapidly recruited to the site of injury and pathology where they can kill pathogens via different mechanisms such as phagocytosis, production of ROS and NET formation [18]. They can also exert immunosuppressive activities [27,33,34]. And they play a major role in the induction as well as the resolution of inflammation [1417].

HIV infected individuals often experienced neutropenia, this can be reversed by ART [35]. Neutrophils from HIV positive individuals also display impaired effector functions, such as phagocytosis, oxidative burst and chemotaxis [36]. These dysfunctions have been associated with a higher risk of opportunistic infections. Some of these effector functions are not fully restored with ART treatment (reviewed in [37]).

Neutrophils have been shown to play both a protective and a detrimental role in experimental models of leishmaniases [38]. Their role in human visceral leishmaniasis is not fully understood and has been poorly characterized in VL patients co-infected with HIV. Our previous study [24] has shown that in VL patients, neutrophil effector functions and activation status were impaired at time of VL diagnosis, and that these function and activation markers were not always fully restored at the end of treatment. We proposed that dysfunctional neutrophils play a crucial role in the uncontrolled parasite replication and in the systemic inflammatory response in VL patients at the time of diagnosis. Here we extended these findings and showed that in patients infected with L. donovani alone, the activation status, as measured by the expression levels of CD63, CD62L and arginase 1 as well as their capacity to phagocytose bioparticles and produce ROS in response to pyocyanin is restored over time. We also show that in VL patients, the median neutrophil counts remain lower as compared to controls until 3m post EoT and are restored at 6-12m. In contrast, in VL/HIV patients, the median neutrophil counts remain significantly lower throughout follow-up and at 6-12m, were still 48% lower as compared to healthy controls. This neutropenia might be explained by several mechanisms:

  1. Splenic sequestration, where blood cells are sequestered in the spleen of patients [39,40].
  2. Bone marrow failure: Leishmania and HIV can infect hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells [4143] and thus impact haematopoiesis [42,44], this will contribute to neutropenia. And indeed, both HIV and Leishmania infections are associated with ineffective haematopoiesis and severe neutropenia [24,26,45]. Neutropenia in VL patients was shown to be associated with a low neutrophil reserve in the bone marrow [46]. HIV proteins have also been shown to have the ability to suppress CFU-granulocyte macrophage [47]. This will also contribute to neutropenia.
  3. Apoptosis: neutrophils will undergo apoptosis so that inflammation can be regulated. We and others have shown high levels of inflammatory cytokines in the plasma of VL patients [13,24,48] and VL/HIV patients [13]. It is therefore possible that the neutropenia characteristic of these patients results at least in part from excessive neutrophil apoptosis [49].

Neutropenia in VL patients can be reversed by injection of GM-CSF, this has been shown to be associated with a significant decrease of secondary infections [50]. This might explain the higher rate of opportunistic infections characteristic of these patients [6]. The poor prognosis of VL/HIV patients as compared to VL is likely to be further worsened by the impaired ability of neutrophils from VL/HIV patients to phagocytose bacterial particles throughout follow-up. This is likely to impede the effective control of opportunistic infections. And indeed, sepsis as well as opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis have been shown to be a predictor of death or poor treatment outcome in VL/HIV patients [6,51]. Whereas ROS production in response to pyocyanin was impaired at ToD in both VL and VL/HIV patients, it was restored faster in VL/HIV patients. This increased ability to produce ROS could be detrimental, as it could contribute to neutrophil apoptosis, as well as to sustained inflammation and tissue damage [49]. Whereas ROS can play a damaging effect, it has also been shown to play a positive role in the control of Leishmania parasites, as inhibition of ROS resulted in increased parasite survival [52,53].

CD63, CD62L and arginase 1 were all altered at time of diagnosis, suggesting that neutrophils are activated: CD63 is expressed in the primary granules of neutrophils and following activation of neutrophils, it becomes upregulated at their surface during degranulation [24,28]. CD62L is known to be shed from the neutrophil cell surface following activation [24,29,30]; arginase 1, an enzyme also found in the primary granules of neutrophils, is released in the microenvironment following degranulation of neutrophils [31]. These markers were restored at the end of treatment in both groups of patients, suggesting that these markers are not associated with neutrophil dysfunction in VL/HIV patients. In contrast, whereas CD10 was significantly lower on neutrophils of VL and VL/HIV patients at ToD, it was restored at 3m in VL patients, but remained lower in VL/HIV patients throughout follow-up. CD10 is expressed on mature segmented neutrophils. In our previous study [24], we showed that the lower expression of CD10 was accompanied by a significant increase in band neutrophils, suggesting that neutrophils in these patients were immature. Whereas in the current study, we did not look at smears of purified neutrophils to count the number of band and segmented neutrophils, it is plausible that there is a higher proportion of immature neutrophils in VL/HIV patients. The ineffective haematopoiesis [42,44] could result in the release of immature neutrophils in the circulation, that would at least partially explain the lower levels of CD10 on peripheral neutrophils in VL/HIV patients. CD10 is a neutral endopeptidase that can play an important role in the regulation of inflammatory processes. It is present on the membrane of the neutrophilic secretory granules [54] and its expression increases following activation of neutrophils [32]. CD10 can hydrolyse a variety of peptides that can promote inflammation [32,55]. It is therefore possible that the lack of CD10 expression on neutrophils contributes to the uncontrolled inflammation that is characteristic of VL/HIV patients over time [13]. Indeed, we have recently shown that VL/HIV patients have high levels of inflammatory cytokines in their plasma over time [13].

In addition to its role in inflammation, CD10 has been shown to play a role in the morphology and migration of neutrophils, as well as in some adhesion molecules [32]. Furthermore, CD10 negative neutrophils have been shown to increase production of IFN-γ by CD4+ T cells [56].

As described in our previous publication [13], VL/HIV patients were treated with different combinational therapies. We cannot exclude that these treatments might have impacted on neutrophils. Indeed, AZT, a drug that was used in our cohort of VL/HIV patients, has been shown to result in neutropenia [57]. Furthermore, different classes of antiretroviral agents have been shown to impact on neutrophil effector functions, such as phagocytosis and ROS production, as well as on the expression levels of cell surface markers (summarised in [58]). However, due to the small numbers of patients receiving some of the treatments, it was not possible to dissect the impact of the different ART regimens on neutrophils.

In summary, our results show that in VL/HIV patients, neutrophil counts, as well as the ability of neutrophils to phagocytose bioparticle and express CD10, are not restored following treatment; suggesting that neutrophils play a key role in the poor prognosis of these patients.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Comparison of ROS induction by pyocyanin in neutrophils between VL and VL/HIV patients and controls over time.

Neutrophils were isolated by dextran sedimentation from the blood of VL (ToD: n = 28, EoT: n = 20, 3m: n = 25, 6-12m: n = 33) and VL/HIV (ToD: n = 22, EoT: n = 27, 3m: n = 19, 6-12m: n = 23) patients and incubated in the absence (-) or presence (+) of pyocyanin. The production of ROS was evaluated by flowcytometry. Each symbol represents the value for one individual. Statistical differences between the MFI obtained in the absence and the presence of pyocyanin at each time point were assessed by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. ToD = Time of Diagnosis; EoT = End of Treatment; 3m = 3 months post EoT; 6-12m = 6–12 months post EoT. ns = not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010681.s001

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff of the Leishmaniasis Research and Treatment Centre for their support and DNDi for supporting the VL treatment service at the University of Gondar.

References

  1. 1. Ruiz-Postigo JA, Grout L, Jain S. Global leishmaniasis surveillance, 2017–2018, and first report on 5 additional indicators. Weekly epidemiological record. 2020;25(95):165–280.
  2. 2. Gadisa E, Tsegaw T, Abera A, Elnaiem DE, den Boer M, Aseffa A, et al. Eco-epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:381. pmid:26187584; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4506599.
  3. 3. Leta S, Dao TH, Mesele F, Alemayehu G. Visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia: an evolving disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(9):e3131. pmid:25188253; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4154678.
  4. 4. Diro E, Edwards T, Ritmeijer K, Fikre H, Abongomera C, Kibret A, et al. Long term outcomes and prognostics of visceral leishmaniasis in HIV infected patients with use of pentamidine as secondary prophylaxis based on CD4 level: a prospective cohort study in Ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(2):e0007132. Epub 2019/02/23. pmid:30789910; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6400407.
  5. 5. Mohammed R, Fikre H, Schuster A, Mekonnen T, van Griensven J, Diro E. Multiple Relapses of Visceral Leishmaniasis in HIV Co-Infected Patients: A Case Series from Ethiopia. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020;92:100583. Epub 2020/05/10. pmid:32382359; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7198908 content of this article.
  6. 6. Hurissa Z, Gebre-Silassie S, Hailu W, Tefera T, Lalloo DG, Cuevas LE, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of patients with visceral leishmaniasis and HIV co-infection in northwest Ethiopia. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15(7):848–55. Epub 2010/05/22. doi: TMI2550 [pii] pmid:20487426.
  7. 7. Diro E, Lynen L, Mohammed R, Boelaert M, Hailu A, van Griensven J. High parasitological failure rate of visceral leishmaniasis to sodium stibogluconate among HIV co-infected adults in Ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5):e2875. pmid:24854196; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4031116.
  8. 8. Cota GF, de Sousa MR, Rabello A. Predictors of visceral leishmaniasis relapse in HIV-infected patients: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(6):e1153. pmid:21666786; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3110161.
  9. 9. Abongomera C, Diro E, de Lima Pereira A, Buyze J, Stille K, Ahmed F, et al. The initial effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and miltefosine combination for treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in HIV co-infected patients in Ethiopia: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(5):e0006527. Epub 2018/05/26. pmid:29799869; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5991765.
  10. 10. van Griensven J, Mengesha B, Mekonnen T, Fikre H, Takele Y, Adem E, et al. Leishmania Antigenuria to Predict Initial Treatment Failure and Relapse in Visceral Leishmaniasis/HIV Coinfected Patients: An Exploratory Study Nested Within a Clinical Trial in Ethiopia. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:94. Epub 2018/04/14. pmid:29651411; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5884955.
  11. 11. ter Horst R, Collin SM, Ritmeijer K, Bogale A, Davidson RN. Concordant HIV infection and visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia: the influence of antiretroviral treatment and other factors on outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(11):1702–9. Epub 2008/04/19. pmid:18419422.
  12. 12. Abongomera C, Diro E, Vogt F, Tsoumanis A, Mekonnen Z, Admassu H, et al. The Risk and Predictors of Visceral Leishmaniasis Relapse in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Coinfected Patients in Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(10):1703–10. Epub 2017/10/12. pmid:29020196; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5848226.
  13. 13. Takele Y, Mulaw T, Adem E, Shaw CJ, Franssen SU, Womersley R, et al. Immunological factors, but not clinical features, predict visceral leishmaniasis relapse in patients co-infected with HIV. Cell Rep Med. 2022;3(1):100487. Epub 2022/02/03. pmid:35106507; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8784791.
  14. 14. Jaillon S, Galdiero MR, Del Prete D, Cassatella MA, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Neutrophils in innate and adaptive immunity. Semin Immunopathol. 2013;35(4):377–94. pmid:23553214.
  15. 15. Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Costantini C, Jaillon S. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(8):519–31. pmid:21785456.
  16. 16. Castanheira FVS, Kubes P. Neutrophils and NETs in modulating acute and chronic inflammation. Blood. 2019;133(20):2178–85. Epub 2019/03/23. pmid:30898862.
  17. 17. Burn GL, Foti A, Marsman G, Patel DF, Zychlinsky A. The Neutrophil. Immunity. 2021;54(7):1377–91. Epub 2021/07/15. pmid:34260886.
  18. 18. Hurrell BP, Regli IB, Tacchini-Cottier F. Different Leishmania Species Drive Distinct Neutrophil Functions. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32(5):392–401. pmid:26944469.
  19. 19. Pearson RD, Steigbigel RT. Phagocytosis and killing of the protozoan Leishmania donovani by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Immunol. 1981;127(4):1438–43. pmid:7276565.
  20. 20. Gabriel C, McMaster WR, Girard D, Descoteaux A. Leishmania donovani promastigotes evade the antimicrobial activity of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Immunol. 2010;185(7):4319–27. pmid:20826753.
  21. 21. Ohms M, Ferreira C, Busch H, Wohlers I, Guerra de Souza AC, Silvestre R, et al. Enhanced Glycolysis Is Required for Antileishmanial Functions of Neutrophils Upon Infection With Leishmania donovani. Front Immunol. 2021;12:632512. Epub 2021/04/06. pmid:33815385; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8017142.
  22. 22. Pitale DM, Gendalur NS, Descoteaux A, Shaha C. Leishmania donovani Induces Autophagy in Human Blood-Derived Neutrophils. J Immunol. 2019;202(4):1163–75. Epub 2019/01/13. pmid:30635391.
  23. 23. Mollinedo F, Janssen H, de la Iglesia-Vicente J, Villa-Pulgarin JA, Calafat J. Selective fusion of azurophilic granules with Leishmania-containing phagosomes in human neutrophils. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(45):34528–36. Epub 2010/08/31. doi: M110.125302 [pii] pmid:20801889; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2966068.
  24. 24. Yizengaw MG E., Tajebe F., Cruz Cervera E., Adem E., Mesfin G., Hailu A., Yardley V., Lemma M., Zkhedy S., Diro E., Yeshanew A., Melkamu R., Mengesha B., Modolell M., Munder M., Müller I., Takele Y., Kropf P. Visceral leishmaniasis patients display altered composition and maturity of neutrophils as well as impaired neutrophil effector functions Frontiers in Immunology. 2016;7:517. pmid:27965662
  25. 25. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of leishmaniasis in Ethiopia (2013). https://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/burden/Guideline_for_diagnosis_treatment_and_prevention_of_leishmaniasis_in_Ethiopia.pdf
  26. 26. NATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR COMPREHENSIVE HIV PREVENTION, CARE AND TREATMENT, 2017. https://www.childrenandaids.org/sites/default/files/2018-05/Ethiopia_Nat%20Guidelines%20ART_2017.pdf
  27. 27. Cloke T, Garvery L, Choi BS, Abebe T, Hailu A, Hancock M, et al. Increased arginase activity correlates with disease severity in HIV seropositive patients. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;202:374–85. pmid:20575659
  28. 28. Kuijpers TW, Tool AT, van der Schoot CE, Ginsel LA, Onderwater JJ, Roos D, et al. Membrane surface antigen expression on neutrophils: a reappraisal of the use of surface markers for neutrophil activation. Blood. 1991;78(4):1105–11. Epub 1991/08/15. pmid:1907873.
  29. 29. Elghetany MT. Surface antigen changes during normal neutrophilic development: a critical review. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2002;28(2):260–74. Epub 2002/06/18. doi: S1079979602905139 [pii]. pmid:12064921.
  30. 30. Ivetic A, Hoskins Green HL, Hart SJ. L-selectin: A Major Regulator of Leukocyte Adhesion, Migration and Signaling. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1068. Epub 2019/05/30. pmid:31139190; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6527602.
  31. 31. Munder M. Arginase: an emerging key player in the mammalian immune system. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;158(3):638–51. Epub 2009/09/22. doi: BPH291 [pii] pmid:19764983; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2765586.
  32. 32. Shipp MA, Stefano GB, Switzer SN, Griffin JD, Reinherz EL. CD10 (CALLA)/neutral endopeptidase 24.11 modulates inflammatory peptide-induced changes in neutrophil morphology, migration, and adhesion proteins and is itself regulated by neutrophil activation. Blood. 1991;78(7):1834–41. Epub 1991/10/01. pmid:1717072.
  33. 33. Marini O, Costa S, Bevilacqua D, Calzetti F, Tamassia N, Spina C, et al. Mature CD10(+) and immature CD10(-) neutrophils present in G-CSF-treated donors display opposite effects on T cells. Blood. 2017;129(10):1343–56. Epub 2017/01/06. pmid:28053192.
  34. 34. Bowers NL, Helton ES, Huijbregts RP, Goepfert PA, Heath SL, Hel Z. Immune suppression by neutrophils in HIV-1 infection: role of PD-L1/PD-1 pathway. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(3):e1003993. pmid:24626392; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3953441.
  35. 35. Levine AM, Karim R, Mack W, Gravink DJ, Anastos K, Young M, et al. Neutropenia in human immunodeficiency virus infection: data from the women’s interagency HIV study. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(4):405–10. Epub 2006/03/01. pmid:16505259.
  36. 36. Hensley-McBain T, Klatt NR. The Dual Role of Neutrophils in HIV Infection. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018;15(1):1–10. Epub 2018/03/09. pmid:29516266; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6086572.
  37. 37. Shi X, Sims MD, Hanna MM, Xie M, Gulick PG, Zheng YH, et al. Neutropenia during HIV infection: adverse consequences and remedies. Int Rev Immunol. 2014;33(6):511–36. Epub 2014/03/25. pmid:24654626; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4873957.
  38. 38. Passelli K, Billion O, Tacchini-Cottier F. The Impact of Neutrophil Recruitment to the Skin on the Pathology Induced by Leishmania Infection. Front Immunol. 2021;12:649348. Epub 2021/03/19. pmid:33732265; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7957080.
  39. 39. Varma N, Naseem S. Hematologic changes in visceral leishmaniasis/kala azar. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2010;26(3):78–82. Epub 2011/09/03. pmid:21886387; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3002089.
  40. 40. de Freitas EO, Leoratti FM, Freire-de-Lima CG, Morrot A, Feijo DF. The Contribution of Immune Evasive Mechanisms to Parasite Persistence in Visceral Leishmaniasis. Front Immunol. 2016;7:153. Epub 2016/05/06. pmid:27148272; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4840207.
  41. 41. Cotterell SE, Engwerda CR, Kaye PM. Enhanced hematopoietic activity accompanies parasite expansion in the spleen and bone marrow of mice infected with Leishmania donovani. Infect Immun. 2000;68(4):1840–8. pmid:10722572; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC97356.
  42. 42. Carvalho-Gontijo R, Moreira DR, Resende M, Costa-Silva MF, Peruhype-Magalhaes V, Ribeiro CMF, et al. Infection of hematopoietic stem cells by Leishmania infantum increases erythropoiesis and alters the phenotypic and functional profiles of progeny. Cell Immunol. 2018;326:77–85. Epub 20171107. pmid:29248120.
  43. 43. Tsukamoto T. Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells and the Pathogenesis of HIV/AIDS. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:60. pmid:32154191; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7047323.
  44. 44. King KY, Goodell MA. Inflammatory modulation of HSCs: viewing the HSC as a foundation for the immune response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(10):685–92. Epub 2011/09/10. pmid:21904387; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4154310.
  45. 45. Abbasi I, Aramin S, Hailu A, Shiferaw W, Kassahun A, Belay S, et al. Evaluation of PCR procedures for detecting and quantifying Leishmania donovani DNA in large numbers of dried human blood samples from a visceral leishmaniasis focus in Northern Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:153. pmid:23530965; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3621070.
  46. 46. Musumeci SD’Agata A, Schiliro G, Fischer A. Leukokinetic studies in Mediterranean kala azar. Acta Trop. 1978;35(2):183–93. pmid:28657
  47. 47. Rameshwar P, Denny TN, Gascon P. Enhanced HIV-1 activity in bone marrow can lead to myelopoietic suppression partially contributed by gag p24. J Immunol. 1996;157(9):4244–50. pmid:8892663.
  48. 48. Nylen S, Sacks D. Interleukin-10 and the pathogenesis of human visceral leishmaniasis. Trends Immunol. 2007;28(9):378–84. pmid:17689290.
  49. 49. Perez-Figueroa E, Alvarez-Carrasco P, Ortega E, Maldonado-Bernal C. Neutrophils: Many Ways to Die. Front Immunol. 2021;12:631821. Epub 2021/03/23. pmid:33746968; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7969520.
  50. 50. Badaro R, Nascimento C, Carvalho JS, Badaro F, Russo D, Ho JL, et al. Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor reverses neutropenia and reduces secondary infections in visceral leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis. 1994;170(2):413–8. pmid:8035028.
  51. 51. van Griensven J, Mohammed R, Ritmeijer K, Burza S, Diro E. Tuberculosis in Visceral Leishmaniasis-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection: An Evidence Gap in Improving Patient Outcomes? Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(4):ofy059. Epub 20180316. pmid:29732379; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5925430.
  52. 52. Carneiro PP, Conceicao J, Macedo M, Magalhaes V, Carvalho EM, Bacellar O. The Role of Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species in the Killing of Leishmania braziliensis by Monocytes from Patients with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148084. Epub 20160203. pmid:26840253; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4739692.
  53. 53. Novais FO, Nguyen BT, Beiting DP, Carvalho LP, Glennie ND, Passos S, et al. Human classical monocytes control the intracellular stage of Leishmania braziliensis by reactive oxygen species. J Infect Dis. 2014;209(8):1288–96. pmid:24403561; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3969552.
  54. 54. Faurschou M, Borregaard N. Neutrophil granules and secretory vesicles in inflammation. Microbes Infect. 2003;5(14):1317–27. Epub 2003/11/14. pmid:14613775.
  55. 55. Xie L, Takahara M, Nakahara T, Oba J, Uchi H, Takeuchi S, et al. CD10-bearing fibroblasts may inhibit skin inflammation by down-modulating substance P. Arch Dermatol Res. 2011;303(1):49–55. Epub 2010/11/16. pmid:21076839.
  56. 56. Fraccarollo D, Neuser J, Moller J, Riehle C, Galuppo P, Bauersachs J. Expansion of CD10(neg) neutrophils and CD14(+)HLA-DR(neg/low) monocytes driving proinflammatory responses in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Elife. 2021;10. Epub 20210722. pmid:34289931; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8324297.
  57. 57. Richman DD, Fischl MA, Grieco MH, Gottlieb MS, Volberding PA, Laskin OL, et al. The toxicity of azidothymidine (AZT) in the treatment of patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(4):192–7. pmid:3299090.
  58. 58. Madzime M, Rossouw TM, Theron AJ, Anderson R, Steel HC. Interactions of HIV and Antiretroviral Therapy With Neutrophils and Platelets. Front Immunol. 2021;12:634386. Epub 20210312. pmid:33777022; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7994251.