Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Extracellular vesicles from Trichinella spiralis: Proteomic analysis and protective immunity

  • Xin Gao ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Xin Gao, Yong Yang, Xiaolei Liu

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China

  • Yong Yang ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Xin Gao, Yong Yang, Xiaolei Liu

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China

  • Xiaolei Liu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Xin Gao, Yong Yang, Xiaolei Liu

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China

  • Fengyan Xu,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China

  • Yang Wang,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China

  • Lei Liu,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China

  • Yaming Yang,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, Yunnan, China

  • Mingyuan Liu ,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    liumy@jlu.edu.cn(ML); namiya23@163.com(XB)

    Affiliations Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China, Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, China

  • Xue Bai

    Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    liumy@jlu.edu.cn(ML); namiya23@163.com(XB)

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research, Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China

Abstract

Trichinella spiralis (T. spiralis) derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been proposed to play a key role in regulating the host immune responses. In this study, we provided the first investigation of EVs proteomics released by T. spiralis muscle larvae (ML). T. spiralis ML EVs (Ts-ML-EVs) were successfully isolated and characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and western blotting. Using liquid chromatograph mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) analysis, we identified 753 proteins in the Ts-ML-EVs proteome and annotated by gene ontology (GO). These proteins were enriched in different categories by GO, kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) and domain analysis. GO enrichment analysis indicated association of protein deglutathionylation, lysosomal lumen and serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity with proteins which may be helpful during parasite-host interaction. Moreover, KEGG enrichment analysis revealed involvement of Ts-ML-EVs proteins in other glycan degradation, complement and coagulation cascades, proteasome and various metabolism pathways. In addition, BALB/c mice were immunized by subcutaneous injection of purified Ts-ML-EVs. Ts-ML-EVs group demonstrated a 23.4% reduction in adult worms and a 43.7% reduction in ML after parasite challenge. Cellular and humoral immune responses induced by Ts-ML-EVs were detected, including the levels of specific antibodies (IgG, IgM, IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a) as well as cytokines (IL-12, IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-10) in serum. The results showed that Ts-ML-EVs could induce a Th1/Th2 mixed immune response with Th2 predominant. This study revealed a potential role of Ts-ML-EVs in T. spiralis biology, particularly in the interaction with host. This work provided a critical step to against T. spiralis infection based on Ts-ML-EVs.

Author summary

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play an important role in cell-cell communication. They can transport functional molecules to target tissues and cells. During parasite infection, EVs provide suitable diagnostic makers and vaccine antigens for as well as inducing host immune responses. In Trichinella spiralis (T. spiralis), we previous proved that Ts-ML-EVs exerted immunomodulatory effect that inhibited experimental colitis in mice. Based on these results, we tested the protein composition of Ts-ML-EVs and the immune protective effect of Ts-ML-EVs. Our study showed that Ts-ML-EVs contained a number of immune-related proteins and it could be potential vaccine antigen for preventing T. spiralis infection.

Introduction

Trichinellosis is a zoonotic disease caused by the genus Trichinella, primarily Trichinella spiralis (T. spiralis) [1]. Trichinellosis is both a public health hazard and a significant economic burden on food safety [2]. The life cycle of T. spiralis comprises two generations within the same host. Host infections begin with the ingestion of T. spiralis muscle larvae (ML) within the muscle tissue of domestic or wild animals [3]. ML then penetrate the intestinal mucosa and develop into the adult worm. After delivery by female adult worms, newborn larvae (NBL) migrate to striated muscle cells [4]. The NBL subsequently develop into infective ML, which can live in the striated muscle for many years. In order to successfully invade and establish infection in the host, T. spiralis has evolved variety of complex immunomodulatory mechanisms at different stages of parasitic growth to evade or suppress the immune response [5]. Therefore, further research is needed to develop new prevention strategies against T. spiralis.

In recent years, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been considered to be an important component of parasite immune escape strategies through the transport of immunomodulatory cargo molecules [6]. EVs seem to be the main way that parasite export proteins, and some even contain host homologous proteins [7]. It has been found that EVs released by several parasites can deliver bioactive molecules to host cells, thereby regulating host gene expression [8]. Selective packaging of proteins may allow the parasite to migrate and establish within the host [9]. EVs from Fasciola hepatica contain many established immunoregulatory proteins, including Sigma class glutathione transferase [10]. Taenia pisiformis cysticercus EVs contain 87 proteins, including proteins associated with EVs biogenesis, and these induce a Th2-type immune response in RAW264.7 macrophages [11]. Similarly, EVs signaling appears to be the main mechanism through which Leishmania transmits virulence factors to host cells [12]. The above studies provide evidence that parasite EVs is a mechanism by which parasites secrete proteins to the host, and EVs proteins are important mediators of biological processes such as adherence, immunomodulation and inflammation [13]. The study of EVs and their protein components is beneficial for the development of anti-parasitic vaccines, which will help to further explore how to control parasitic diseases.

It has been confirmed that many of these EVs functional proteins have the potential for immune protection against parasitic infection. C57BL/6 mice immunized with Heligmosomoides polygyrus EVs-alum produced high levels of IgG1, demonstrate a protective immunity against parasitic challenge, highlighting the important role of EVs functional proteins in vivo [14]. Evidence that the biological fate of EVs from parasites can be altered by anti-EVs antibodies is accumulating. Antibodies to Heligmosomoides polygyrus EVs alter the intracellular distribution of EVs, directing them enter the lysosomal pathway [14]. Echinococcus granulosus secretes EVs containing many functional proteins (including 14-3-3 proteins), and 14-3-3 protein could provide 97% protection against infection after parasite challenge in rodent [15]. Proteins of the tetraspanin family (TSPs) on the surface of Opisthorchis viverrini EVs have proven to be an effective vaccine in a hamster model of metacercariae infection [16]. In addition, antibodies to Opisthorchis viverrini tetraspanin block uptake of EVs and the secretion of IL-6 by cholangiocytes [17]. Therefore, it is important to identify EVs proteins for the development of vaccines against parasite infection.

T. spiralis ML EVs (Ts-ML-EVs) have previously been isolated and characterized in our laboratory. Ts-ML-EVs could significantly inhibit 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) induced colitis in BALB/c mice by promoting Th2 immune responses and their small RNA composition is involved in the regulation of inflammation [18]. In addition, Ts-ML-EVs can affect the inflammatory development of DSS-induced colitis by inhibit M1 macrophage polarization, due to their immunomodulatory ability [19]. However, information on the protein composition of Ts-ML-EVs is limited.

In this study, we provided the first proteomic analysis of Ts-ML-EVs with the aim of describing the interaction of Ts-ML-EVs and host. We identified 753 proteins in Ts-ML-EVs. And we demonstrated that these proteins performed multiple functions by GO and KEGG analysis. Moreover, Ts-ML-EVs contained many vaccine candidate antigens thus we investigated the protective immunity afforded by Ts-ML-EVs against T. spiralis infection. We found that Ts-ML-EVs could induce Th2 dominated Th1/Th2 mixed responses by detecting antibodies and cytokines levels in serum of BALB/c mice. Our results help to understand the role of Ts-ML-EVs and the development of vaccines to prevent T. spiralis infection.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Animal research was conducted in accordance with the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals guidelines in China. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jilin University (20170318).

Experimental animals and preparation of Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae

Female BALB/c mice (19–21 g) and female Wistar rats (170–200 g) were obtained from the Experimental Animal Centre of College of Basic Medical Sciences. Experimental animals (eight per cage) were subjected to controlled laboratory conditions (temperature, 18–26°C; 12 h of light/ 12 h of darkness from 9.00 p.m. to 9.00 a.m.). Animals were provided water and food ad libitum, and the sawdust in the cage was changed every 2 days.

After oral infection of Wistar rats with a suspension containing 3500 infectious muscle larvae (ML), T. spiralis (ISS534) ML were harvested [20]. Briefly, infected rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate and sacrificed by cervical dislocation at day 35 after infection. All procedures were carefully designed to minimize pain. The muscles of infected rats were homogenized, and then added to a pepsin solution (1% pepsin; 1% HCl) in a ratio of 1:30. The homogenized muscle suspension was then incubated at 37°C for 2 h for digestion. Finally, the suspension was filtered through 600 μm meshes and repeatedly sedimented until clear. The presence of ML in the sediments was then confirmed using a microscope.

Isolation of extracellular vesicles from Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae

The collected T. spiralis ML were washed several times, and then cultured in pre-heated RPMI-1640 medium. ML were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. After 12 h, the culture medium containing ML excretory secretion products (Ts-ML-ES) were centrifugated at 800×g for 15 min, followed by centrifugation at 5000×g for 15 min to remove ML [21]. The culture supernatant was then filtered through a 0.22 μm filter to remove debris, and the filtrate was concentrated using ultracentrifugation filters (Merck Millipore, USA) to a final volume of 150 mL. Finally, T. spiralis extracellular vesicles (Ts-ML-EVs) were harvested by ultracentrifugation at 120,000×g for 2 h, as described in previous reports [18]. The concentration of Ts-ML-EVs was measured by BCA kit. The Ts-ML-EVs were then stored at -80°C for further analysis.

Transmission electron microscopy

To characterize the Ts-ML-EVs in our sample, freshly isolated Ts-ML-EVs (10 μL) were directly absorbed onto a copper grid, fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde, and then stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid. The Ts-ML-EVs samples were then immediately observed using a HitachiH-7650 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi Limited, Japan). The diameter of Ts-ML-EVs was then measured using ImageJ software (1.41).

Western blot analysis

T. spiralis ML were resuspended in cell lysis buffer and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. The lysate was then centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000 rpm to obtain total ML proteins. Ts-ML-EVs and ML protein samples (30 μg) were then separated by electrophoresis on 10% SDS-PAGE gel. The separated proteins were then transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, USA) for western blot analysis. After a 2 h blocking step in 5% skim milk, Enolase was detected by incubation with polyclonal goat anti-enolase (1:200; Abcam, United Kingdom) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with donkey anti-goat IgG-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (1:50,000; Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA) at room temperature for 2 h. Visual detection of membranes was performed using the ECL Plus Western blotting detection system (GE Healthcare Buckinghamshire, UK).

Proteomic analysis

The Ts-ML-EVs sample was sonicated using an ultrasonic processor (Scientz) in the presence of 1% protease inhibitor. The sample was then clarified by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration was determined using a BCA kit (according to the manufacturer’s instructions). Finally, 5 μg of Ts-ML-EVs protein was loaded on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel for electrophoresis. The separated proteins were then visualized by silver staining.

Samples from the gel were submitted to the PTM BIO Service for liquid chromatography/ mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS, Thermo Scientific, USA) analysis. Briefly, specific protein bands were digested with trypsin to obtain tryptic peptides for subsequent analysis. The tryptic digests were then separated and individual peptides were identified by LC-MS/MS using a Q Exactive mass spectrometer coupled to an EASY-nLC 1200 UPLC system. The samples were ionized by electrospray (Thermo Scientific, USA), and the data were analyzed using the Maxquant search engine (v.1.5.2.8). The sequence dataset used for the analysis of the LC-MS/MS analysis was Trichinella _ spiralis (18572 sequences) from UniProt database.

The Ts-ML-EVs proteins identified were then analyzed by Gene Ontology (GO) classification using the UniProt-GOA database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/GOA/). The Kyoto Encyclopedia of genes and Genomes (KEGG) database was also used to annotate protein pathways. In addition, the Ts-ML-EVs proteins identified were searched against the STRING database (version 11.0) for protein-protein interactions. All interactions with a confidence score > 0.7 (high confidence) were included. The STRING interaction network was then visualized using the R package “networkD3”.

Immunization and challenge protocol

For immunization, eight mice in 3 groups were subcutaneous injected with PBS, PBS+IMS1313 (SEPPIC), and Ts-ML-EVs (s. c.) (with IMS1313) on day 0, day 14 and day 28. IMS1313 was used as an adjuvant. All samples contained 30 μg Ts-ML-EVs in 100 μL of PBS and 100μL IMS1313. Two weeks after the last immunization, the 3 groups of animals were challenged with 300 ML [22]. All experiments were repeated three times. The numbers of adult worms (4 mice) and ML (4 mice) were determined on day 6 and day 35. The mice were anesthetized with isoflurane before blood collection. Capillary needle was inserted into the inferior orbital venous plexus of mice. After 200–300 μL blood was collected, the blood collection needle was pulled out and the mouse eye was pressed with a clean cotton ball to stop bleeding. Put the mice in a separate cage and pay attention to their recovery and physical condition. Blood samples allowed to clot for 2 h at room temperature before centrifugation at 1000×g for 15 min. The serum was then stored at -20°C.

Analysis of antibody response and cytokines expression by ELISA

Serum samples were collected to analyze cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, and IFN-γ) using ELISA kits (Cusabio, CN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The expression of cytokines was inferred from the standard curve provided by the ELISA kits. Indirect ELISA was used to detect the Ts-ML-EVs specific IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, IgM and IgE antibody levels. ELISA plates were coated with 1μg/mL Ts-ML-EVs at 4°C overnight. After blocking with 5% skimmed milk for 1h at 37°C, serum was added in serial dilutions to ELISA plates. Antibody binding was detected using horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, IgM and IgE (Southern Biotech) and read at 450 nm.

Statistical analysis

All results are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 for Windows. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare statistical differences between the different conditions. And Dunnett’s multiple comparison was used to describe the statistical analysis (compared with the PBS group). P values are expressed as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001 (compared with the PBS group).

Results

Proteomics analysis of Ts-ML-EVs

In order to obtain Ts-ML-EVs, vesicles were isolated from RPMI-1640 medium as previously described [19]. Transmission electron microcopy (TEM) analysis showed that the vesicles were round with bilayer (Fig 1A) [18]. Western blot analysis revealed that the Ts-ML-EVs express the EVs marker enolase (Fig 1B). Together, these observations provide evidence for the successful isolation of Ts-ML-EVs. To elucidate the constituents of the Ts-ML-EVs proteome, Ts-ML-EVs total protein was analysed by SDS-PAGE and silver staining. The result showed that proteins contained in EVs, mainly distributed in the molecular weight of 45-70kDa (Fig 1C). To further determine the protein composition of Ts-ML-EVs, proteomic analysis of isolated bands was performed using LC-MS/MS. Proteomic results showed that 753 proteins were identified in EVs secreted in T. spiralis. The top 50 enriched Ts-ML-EVs proteins were mainly including translation regulatory proteins, nuclear regulatory proteins, signal transduction proteins, cytoskeletal proteins, serpins, enzymes, secreted proteins, transporters, immunity related proteins, protease inhibitors, metabolism related proteins, metabolic enzymes and other proteins (S1 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Characterization and protein analysis of Ts-ML-EVs.

(A) Morphological characterization of Ts-ML-EVs by TEM. Arrows indicate isolated Ts-ML-EVs. (B) Western blot analysis showing the marker protein of Ts-ML-EVs. (C) SDS-PAGE analyses of purified Ts-ML-EVs using silver-staining.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010528.g001

Functional annotation and cellular localization of EVs proteins in T. spiralis

We annotated proteins of Ts-ML-EVs with Gene ontology (GO) analysis. The result showed that 202 proteins were associated with “Biological process”, 182 proteins were associated with “Cellular component”, and 170 proteins were associated with “Molecular function” (Fig 2A). Because regulation of Ts-ML-EVs protein distribution is essential for intracellular physiological homeostasis, we next examined the subcellular distribution of Ts-ML-EVs proteins, and classified them according to their distribution. Ts-ML-EVs proteins were mostly distributed in cytoplasm (26.33%) or extracellular (24.47%) locations (Fig 2B). However, Ts-ML-EVs proteins were also distributed in the plasma membrane (14.76%), nucleus (14.1%), and mitochondria (11.3%). Subcellular localization analysis showed that Ts-ML-EVs proteins were distributed in different cell compartments and may involve in a variety of biological functions.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Bioinformatic analyses of proteins in Ts-ML-EVs.

(A) Gene ontology (GO) annotation of all 753 proteins in Ts-ML-EVs. (B) Protein subcellular localization mapping of proteins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010528.g002

Enrichment analysis of Ts-ML-EVs proteins

A total of 753 Ts-ML-EVs proteins were categorised according to gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway, and protein domain. The top 20 classifications showing the most significant enrichment scores were screened further. In the case of “Biological process”, Ts-ML-EVs proteins were most significantly enriched in the protein deglutathionylation, histone H4-R3 methylation, cellular response to superoxide, cytoplasmic translation, and cotranslational protein targeting to membrane categories (Fig 3A). GO enrichment of “Cellular component” revealed that Ts-ML-EVs proteins were most significantly enriched in lysosomal lumen, cytosolic large ribosomal subunit, proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complex, actin filament and proteasome core complex categories (Fig 3B). In the case of “Molecular function”, Ts-ML-EVs proteins were most significantly enriched in serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity, galactoside binding, superoxide dismutase activity, protein disulphide isomerase activity and hydrolase activity, acting on glycosyl bonds categories (Fig 3C). To identity the associated pathways, we performed KEGG analysis, and found that the identified proteins were enriched in 347 pathways. Further analysis revealed that Ts-ML-EVs proteins were significantly enriched in other glycan degradation, complement and coagulation cascades, proteasome and various metabolism pathways (Fig 3D). Protein domains are evolutionary conserved amino acid sequence (25–500 amino acids in length) found in different protein molecules. These protein domains are usually functionally and structurally similar. To explore the conservation of Ts-ML-EVs proteins, we first examined the enrichment of protein domains. The top 3 enriched domains were “Ribosomal protein L24e”, “Lyase”, and “Alpha-L-fucosidase” domains (Fig 3E). Besides, Ts-ML-EVs protein domains were also enriched in “Lamin Tail Domain”, “Trefoil (P-type) domain” and “Cystatin domain”.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Enrichment analyses of the proteins derived from Ts-ML-EVs.

Enrichment analyses by “Biological process” (A), “Cell component” (B), “Molecular function” (C), KEGG pathway (D), and (E), protein domain.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010528.g003

Ts-ML-EVs stimulated protective immunity against T. spiralis

To determine whether Ts-ML-EVs can induce a protective immune response in vivo, BALB/c mice were immunized with purified Ts-ML-EVs in a formulation with adjuvant (given on days 0, 14, and 28) and subsequent T. spiralis infection. On day 6, intestinal adult worm burden of Ts-ML-EVs group was reduced by 23.4% (P<0.05) after infection (Fig 4A). And on day 35, ML burden of Ts-ML-EVs group was reduced by 43.7% (P<0.01) after infection (Fig 4B). These results provide evidence that vaccination of mice with Ts-ML-EVs can elicit partial immune protection against T. spiralis larval infection.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Immunization with Ts-ML-EVs elicited a delay in the course of the infection and increased the survival rate.

(A) Worm burden from 4 vaccinated mice with mean and SD bar shown. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. (B) The LPG from 4 vaccinated mice with mean and SD bar shown. Data were evaluated by Dunnett’s multiple comparison poet hoc test. All data are pooled from three independent experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010528.g004

Ts-ML-EVs induced systemic immune response against T. spiralis challenge

Elevated serum antibodies are commonly used as anti-parasitic responses in infected mice. Serum from all 3 group was collected on day 0. PBS, PBS+IMS1313, and Ts-ML-EVs+IMS1313 were then administered subcutaneously three times. Serum was collected before each injection to track the production of specific antibodies against Ts-ML-EVs. After two weeks, IgG increased in the Ts-ML-EVs group (compared to the PBS group). The increase observed after the four weeks was even more significant, confirming that Ts-ML-EVs can induce an immune response in host. There was no significant difference in IgG level between PBS group and PBS+IMS1313 group (Fig 5A). From two weeks after the immunization with Ts-ML-EVs, IgM increased significantly and remained high throughout the immunization period (Fig 5B). In addition, IgE levels were specifically elevated in mice immunized with Ts-ML-EVs (Fig 5C). IgG1 antibody levels were significantly higher in the Ts-ML-EVs group compared to the PBS group (Fig 5D). High levels of anti-parasitic IgG2a were also detected in the Ts-ML-EVs group, which may indicate that Ts-ML-EVs group mice produced a mixed Th1/Th2 response (Fig 5E). In addition, levels of IgG1 were higher than IgG2a, confirming that Ts-ML-EVs mainly stimulated Th2 immunity (Fig 5F).

thumbnail
Fig 5. EV-sepecific antibodies detected from sera of immunized BALB/c mice.

IgG (A), IgM (B), IgE (C), IgG1 (D) and IgG2a (E) antibodies against Ts-ML-EVs produced were analyzed by ELISA using sera (n = 8/group) from each group. (F) IgG subclass responses of mice immunized with Ts-ML-EVs were detected at different time points. Results represent the mean absorbance measured at 450nm from each group. Data were evaluated by Dunnett’s multiple comparison poet hoc test. All data are pooled from three independent experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010528.g005

Analysis of cytokine expression is essential to determine the outcome of parasitic infection and to understand the mechanisms of parasite rejection or host protection. Thus, we examined the modulatory effects of Ts-ML-EVs on cytokines. Serum samples were collected at 0, 2, 4 and 6 weeks after immunization with Ts-ML-EVs. Th2-type cytokine (IL-4 and IL-10) expression levels were both significantly increased in Ts-ML-EVs groups compared to the PBS group (Fig 6A and 6B). In addition, Th1-type cytokine (IL-12 and IFN-γ) expression levels were also increased in Ts-ML-EVs groups (Fig 6C and 6D). However, there was no significant change between PBS group and PBS+IMS1313 group. The results confirmed that Ts-ML-EVs could induce the mixed response of Th1 and Th2.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Vaccination results increased expression of cytokines in serum.

Expression levels of IL-4 (A), IL-10 (B), IL-12 (C) and IFN-γ (D) stimulated with Ts-ML-EVs were determined by ELISA. Results represent the mean absorbance measured at 450 nm from each group. Data were evaluated by Dunnett’s multiple comparison poet hoc test. All data are pooled from three independent experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010528.g006

Discussion

Parasite extracellular vesicle (EVs) are an important mechanism for the delivery of various functional molecules to host tissues and cells. Exploring the composition of EVs in different parasites is critical not only to understanding how they are utilized for host-parasite communication, but also because EVs are useful in diagnosis and a rich molecular source for vaccine development and the discovery of infection biomarkers [23]. In our study, we enriched Ts-ML-EVs by ultracentrifugation. TEM result showed that the morphology of isolated vesicles was consistent with classical parasite EVs. Moreover, we found that these vesicles expressed EVs marker protein (enolase), which confirmed that Ts-ML-EVs were successfully collected.

To better understand the protein composition of Ts-ML-EVs, we first performed proteomic analysis of Ts-ML-EVs by LC-MS/MS. A total of 753 proteins were identified from Ts-ML-EVs, involved several enzymes including serine protease, glutamate dehydrogenase and cytosol aminopeptidase. Among them, serine protease (SP) play an important role in the interaction between T. spiralis and host. SP from T. spiralis showed the immune protective effects on sodium dextran sulfate (DSS) induced colitis in C57BL/6 mice by reducing the severity of intestinal inflammation and disease index [24]. And SP induced the mix immune response of Th1/Th2 in pig and mice, exhibited partial protective effect on T. spiralis infection [25]. Moreover, Cystatin-like protein (CLP) and DNase II identified in Ts-ML-EVs could also induce protective immunity against T. spiralis in mice and pig respectively [26, 27]. In addition, we found that Ts-ML-EVs contained Myosin-4, which regulated the formation of nursing cells by promoting myoblast differentiation [28]. However, the association of these proteins with Ts-ML-EVs requires further confirmation.

The protein cargo packaged into EVs before release is dependent on the cell source and their activities [29]. While differences in EVs protein content between different species may be due to their residence in host, they may also reflect different conditions during release [30]. A selective packaging of proteins in Ts-ML-EVs was supported by the observed subcellular localization of Ts-ML-EVs proteins. The proteins enriched in Ts-ML-EVs were mainly associated with cytoplasm and extracellular. This result may reflect the biogenetic process of Ts-ML-EVs [31]. This analysis of the Ts-ML-EVs proteome is crucial to understanding the roles of proteins in the different subcellular compartments.

We analyzed Ts-ML-EVs proteins from the perspective of Gene Ontology (GO) annotations, including “Biological process”, “Cellular component”, and “Molecular function”. In the “Biological process” category, we found that proteins were significant enriched in protein deglutathionylation, including protein disulphide isomerase (PDI). PDI is associated with the formation of nurse cells in host muscle cells infected with T. spiralis, thus may be important for the long-term parasitism of parasites [32]. In addition, PDI, as a DNA vaccine, can induce Th1 and Th17 dependent immune responses, and has a significant preventive effect against Leishmania donovani infection [33]. Whether PDI detected in Ts-ML-EVs in this study is a promising vaccine candidate for the prevention of T. spiralis needs further experimental verification. In “Cell component”, Ts-ML-EVs proteins were significant enriched in cytosolic large ribosomal subunit, including 60S ribosomal protein. In malaria, 60S ribosomal protein L6 could be a vaccine antigen provided protective immune response [34]. However, the role of 60S ribosomal protein is still unclear. “Molecular function” analysis revealed that Ts-ML-EVs proteins were significantly enriched in serine-type endopeptidase, including serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 4, which belongs to a conserved superfamily, serine protease inhibitor (SPI) family. It has been reported that T. spiralis SPI could induce the alternative activation of BMDMs, which contributed to the parasitism of parasites [35]. Moreover, it has been proved that Ts-ML-EVs could inhibit M1 macrophage polarization to prevent colitis [19]. Our results showed that Ts-ML-EVs contained many functional proteins. Whether Ts-ML-EVs carried these proteins to regulate host immune response, translation process, and the formation of nurse cells needs further investigation.

KEGG pathways analysis revealed that Ts-ML-EVs proteins mainly enriched in complement and coagulation cascades, and proteasome categories. The complement system plays an important role in bridging the innate and adaptive immune system, and is especially involved in removing invading pathogens, necrotic cells, and apoptotic cells [36]. T. spiralis secreted calreticulin to inhibit the activation of classical complement in the host by binding to C1q [37]. Our study suggested that T. spiralis may also use EVs to perform this role.

Several proteasome subunits have been identified in Ts-ML-EVs, including proteasome subunit beta type-7 (PST) and subunits of 26S proteasome. It has been demonstrated that PST expressed at different developmental stages (intestinal infective larvae, adult worms, NBL, and ML) of T. spiralis and reduced 45.7% adult worm burden in mice [38]. Thus, PST may be used as vaccine antigen against infection of T. spiralis. HSPs play key roles in adaptation, differentiation, and protection of parasites from host killing mechanisms of hosts including reactive oxygen metabolites and low pH [39]. Our result showed that HSP83, HSP beta-1 and alpha-crystallin B chain were identified in Ts-ML-EVs, significantly enriched in the antigen processing and presentation, longevity regulation pathway-multiple species and protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum categories. HSP83, a number of HSP90 family, is involved in signal transduction and is a good candidate antigen of effective immunogen of leishmaniasis [40]. Alpha-crystallin B chain is a small HSP that can prevent ROS production, enhance superoxide dismutase activity, and has potential anti-cute inflammatory function [41]. Our bioinformation analysis revealed the biological and molecular functions of Ts-ML-EVs proteins that may contribute to the reproduction and survival of T. spiralis. Their immune regulatory functions in T. spiralis infection require further investigation.

EVs have been proposed as candidate vaccine antigens against parasite infection in animal challenge models [16]. The advantage of using EVs as vaccines is that their lipid bilayer can carry intracellular components and protect them from extracellular peptidase degradation before being transported to host cells. These components include several antigenic proteins [42]. Our present study showed that mice injected subcutaneously with Ts-ML-EV significantly reduced adult worms and ML burden, suggesting EVs contain antigens that can effectively reduce the transmission and pathology of T. spiralis. Antibody response is an important indicator of immune protection [43]. When parasite infection occurs, specific antibodies, acting as a strong protective immune response, prevent and inhibit parasite from attaching its host cell receptor, further helping immune cells kill and eliminate the parasite [44]. In this study, we analyzed specific antibody responses against Ts-ML-EVs in mice to explore the protective immune effect of Ts-ML-EVs. IgG antibody levels were significantly higher in the Ts-ML-EVs group compared to the PBS group which contributed to strong protective response of subsequent ML infection. This strong immune persisted for several weeks until the end of the experiment. Specific IgG participates in the killing and destruction of newborn larvae through ADCC. Moreover, the high levels of serum IgG and IgE might play an important role in the rapid expulsion of adult worms from the intestine of Ts-ML-EVs immunized mice, and in delaying the larval invasion of the enteric mucosa following challenge infection [45]. Analysis of IgE expression is important because elevated IgE antibody levels are associated with clearance of T. spiralis at the intestinal mucosal level, and mediates mast cell degranulation to impede larval invasion [46]. Most studies have shown that host infection with T. spiralis can produce Th2-based immune response, which may be related to the immune protection of T. spiralis [47]. IgG1 antibody may reflect Th2 response, and IgG2a antibody may reflect Th1 response [48]. Thus, we detected serum IgG1 and IgG2a antibody levels to elucidate the possible protective mechanisms. The results showed that Ts-ML-EVs induced mixed IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies responses, and IgG1 was dominant, suggesting that Ts-ML-EVs induced a mixed Th1/Th2 immune response. Our results provide evidence that a specific antibody response induced by Ts-ML-EVs is important for immune protection against T. spiralis infection.

While antibody responses are necessary for protective immunity, cell-mediated immunity is also important in eliminating parasites [22]. Our study showed that mice immunized with Ts-ML-EVs produced significantly higher levels of Th1 cytokines (IL-12 and IFN-γ) and Th2 cytokines (IL-4) compared to the mice immunized with PBS. It is important to note that high levels of IL-12 cytokines are essential for resistance to T. spiralis, Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii infection, and blocking or lack of functioning IL-12 receptors leads to a high susceptibility to infection with parasites [49]. IFN-γ is involved in killing T. spiralis by activating macrophages and enhancing cytotoxic killing of eosinophils and granulocytes [22]. A study found that the excretion of T. spiralis is primarily regulated by CD4+/Th2 cytokines and is dependent on the production of IL-4, as inhibition of these cytokines prolongs the survival of the parasite [50]. These results indicated that Ts-ML-EVs can induce a mixed Th1/Th2 cellular immune response. In addition, we also measured that Ts-ML-EVs induced high levels of IL-10. IL-10 produced by most cells of the innate and adaptive immune systems, playing an important role in regulating immune response and protecting against T. spiralis [51]. This is consistent with our previous studies that Ts-ML-EVs can improve IBD by modulating innate or adaptive immune responses [18, 19].

Outbreaks of human trichinosis occur directly or indirectly due to pork consumption [52]. Therefore, the development of a vaccine against T. spiralis infection in swine would be another attractive option for disease control, especially for pigs in backyard or free-range conditions. However, most vaccine studies on T. spiralis have been carried out in mouse models, only few studies on resistance to T. spiralis infection in pigs [53]. Thus, we will future study the immune protective of Ts-ML-EVs in pigs in the future.

In conclusion, this study was the first proteomic analysis of Ts-ML-EVs, which serve as a critical source for the discovery of immunotherapeutic biologicals and parasite vaccines. In addition, vaccination of Ts-ML-EVs provided protective immunity against T. spiralis, highlighting their critical role in parasites infection. A better understanding of EVs will be helpful in the interaction of parasite-host and development of T. spiralis vaccines.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Top 50 enriched proteins in Ts-ML-EVs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010528.s001

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Bintsis T. Foodborne pathogens. AIMS microbiology. 2017;3(3):529–63. Epub 2017/06/29. pmid:31294175; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6604998.
  2. 2. Dhama K, Rajagunalan S, Chakraborty S, Verma AK, Kumar A, Tiwari R, et al. Food-borne pathogens of animal origin-diagnosis, prevention, control and their zoonotic significance: a review. Pakistan journal of biological sciences: PJBS. 2013;16(20):1076–85. Epub 2014/02/11. pmid:24506006.
  3. 3. Rawla P, Sharma S. Trichinella Spiralis (Trichnellosis). StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2020.
  4. 4. Gottstein B, Pozio E, Nöckler K. Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2009;22(1):127–45, Table of Contents. Epub 2009/01/13. pmid:19136437; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2620635.
  5. 5. Sun XM, Guo K, Hao CY, Zhan B, Huang JJ, Zhu X. Trichinella spiralis Excretory-Secretory Products Stimulate Host Regulatory T Cell Differentiation through Activating Dendritic Cells. Cells. 2019;8(11). Epub 2019/11/11. pmid:31703440; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6912532.
  6. 6. Tritten L, Geary TG. Helminth extracellular vesicles in host-parasite interactions. Current opinion in microbiology. 2018;46:73–9. Epub 2018/09/03. pmid:30172862.
  7. 7. Sotillo J, Robinson MW, Kimber MJ, Cucher M, Ancarola ME, Nejsum P, et al. The protein and microRNA cargo of extracellular vesicles from parasitic helminths—current status and research priorities. International journal for parasitology. 2020;50(9):635–45. Epub 2020/07/12. pmid:32652128.
  8. 8. Buck AH, Coakley G, Simbari F, McSorley HJ, Quintana JF, Le Bihan T, et al. Exosomes secreted by nematode parasites transfer small RNAs to mammalian cells and modulate innate immunity. Nature communications. 2014;5:5488. Epub 2014/11/26. pmid:25421927; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4263141.
  9. 9. Cwiklinski K, de la Torre-Escudero E, Trelis M, Bernal D, Dufresne PJ, Brennan GP, et al. The Extracellular Vesicles of the Helminth Pathogen, Fasciola hepatica: Biogenesis Pathways and Cargo Molecules Involved in Parasite Pathogenesis. Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP. 2015;14(12):3258–73. Epub 2015/10/22. pmid:26486420; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4762619.
  10. 10. LaCourse EJ, Perally S, Morphew RM, Moxon JV, Prescott M, Dowling DJ, et al. The Sigma class glutathione transferase from the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2012;6(5):e1666. Epub 2012/06/06. pmid:22666515; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3362645.
  11. 11. Wang LQ, Liu TL, Liang PH, Zhang SH, Li TS, Li YP, et al. Characterization of exosome-like vesicles derived from Taenia pisiformis cysticercus and their immunoregulatory role on macrophages. Parasites & vectors. 2020;13(1):318. Epub 2020/06/21. pmid:32560736; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7304098.
  12. 12. Dong G, Filho AL, Olivier M. Modulation of Host-Pathogen Communication by Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) of the Protozoan Parasite Leishmania. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2019;9:100. Epub 2019/04/30. pmid:31032233; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6470181.
  13. 13. Nawaz M, Malik MI, Hameed M, Zhou J. Research progress on the composition and function of parasite-derived exosomes. Acta tropica. 2019;196:30–6. Epub 2019/05/10. pmid:31071298.
  14. 14. Coakley G, McCaskill JL, Borger JG, Simbari F, Robertson E, Millar M, et al. Extracellular Vesicles from a Helminth Parasite Suppress Macrophage Activation and Constitute an Effective Vaccine for Protective Immunity. Cell reports. 2017;19(8):1545–57. Epub 2017/05/26. pmid:28538175; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5457486.
  15. 15. Siles-Lucas M, Merli M, Mackenstedt U, Gottstein B. The Echinococcus multilocularis 14-3-3 protein protects mice against primary but not secondary alveolar echinococcosis. Vaccine. 2003;21(5–6):431–9. Epub 2003/01/18. pmid:12531641.
  16. 16. Chaiyadet S, Sotillo J, Krueajampa W, Thongsen S, Brindley PJ, Sripa B, et al. Vaccination of hamsters with Opisthorchis viverrini extracellular vesicles and vesicle-derived recombinant tetraspanins induces antibodies that block vesicle uptake by cholangiocytes and reduce parasite burden after challenge infection. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2019;13(5):e0007450. Epub 2019/05/29. pmid:31136572; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6555531.
  17. 17. Chaiyadet S, Sotillo J, Smout M, Cantacessi C, Jones MK, Johnson MS, et al. Carcinogenic Liver Fluke Secretes Extracellular Vesicles That Promote Cholangiocytes to Adopt a Tumorigenic Phenotype. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2015;212(10):1636–45. Epub 2015/05/20. pmid:25985904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4621255.
  18. 18. Yang Y, Liu L, Liu X, Zhang Y, Shi H, Jia W, et al. Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Trichinella spiralis Muscle Larvae Ameliorate TNBS-Induced Colitis in Mice. Frontiers in immunology. 2020;11:1174. Epub 2020/07/01. pmid:32595641; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7300183.
  19. 19. Gao X, Yang Y, Liu X, Wang Y, Yang Y, Boireau P, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from Trichinella spiralis prevent colitis by inhibiting M1 macrophage polarization. Acta tropica. 2021;213:105761. Epub 2020/11/23. pmid:33221281.
  20. 20. Jin X, Yang Y, Liu X, Shi H, Cai X, Luo X, et al. Glutathione-S-transferase of Trichinella spiralis regulates maturation and function of dendritic cells. Parasitology. 2019;146(14):1725–32. Epub 2019/08/14. pmid:31405388.
  21. 21. Wang Y, Bai X, Tang B, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Cai X, et al. Comparative analysis of excretory-secretory products of muscle larvae of three isolates of Trichinella pseudospiralis by the iTRAQ method. Veterinary parasitology. 2020:109119. Epub 2020/05/07. pmid:32370915.
  22. 22. Yang Y, Bai X, Li C, Tong M, Zhang P, Cai W, et al. Molecular Characterization of Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate Aldolase From Trichinella spiralis and Its Potential in Inducing Immune Protection. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2019;9:122. Epub 2019/05/10. pmid:31069178; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6491450.
  23. 23. Murphy A, Cwiklinski K, Lalor R, O’Connell B, Robinson MW, Gerlach J, et al. Fasciola hepatica Extracellular Vesicles isolated from excretory-secretory products using a gravity flow method modulate dendritic cell phenotype and activity. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2020;14(9):e0008626. Epub 2020/09/09. pmid:32898175; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7521716.
  24. 24. Long SR, Liu RD, Kumar DV, Wang ZQ, Su CW. Immune Protection of a Helminth Protein in the DSS-Induced Colitis Model in Mice. Frontiers in immunology. 2021;12:664998. Epub 2021/05/18. pmid:33995396; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8117093.
  25. 25. Xu D, Bai X, Xu J, Wang X, Dong Z, Shi W, et al. The immune protection induced by a serine protease from the Trichinella spiralis adult against Trichinella spiralis infection in pigs. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2021;15(5):e0009408. Epub 2021/05/11. pmid:33970910; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8136858.
  26. 26. Tang B, Liu M, Wang L, Yu S, Shi H, Boireau P, et al. Characterisation of a high-frequency gene encoding a strongly antigenic cystatin-like protein from Trichinella spiralis at its early invasion stage. Parasites & vectors. 2015;8:78. Epub 2015/02/06. pmid:25653126; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4334762.
  27. 27. Xu D, Tang B, Yang Y, Cai X, Jia W, Luo X, et al. Vaccination with a DNase II recombinant protein against Trichinella spiralis infection in pigs. Veterinary parasitology. 2020:109069. Epub 2020/03/12. pmid:32156436.
  28. 28. Bai X, Wang XL, Tang B, Shi HN, Boireau P, Rosenthal B, et al. The roles of supernatant of macrophage treated by excretory-secretory products from muscle larvae of Trichinella spiralis on the differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts. Veterinary parasitology. 2016;231:83–91. Epub 2016/08/10. pmid:27501988.
  29. 29. Simons M, Raposo G. Exosomes—vesicular carriers for intercellular communication. Current opinion in cell biology. 2009;21(4):575–81. Epub 2009/05/16. pmid:19442504.
  30. 30. Nowacki FC, Swain MT, Klychnikov OI, Niazi U, Ivens A, Quintana JF, et al. Protein and small non-coding RNA-enriched extracellular vesicles are released by the pathogenic blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of extracellular vesicles. 2015;4:28665. Epub 2015/10/08. pmid:26443722; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4595467.
  31. 31. Colombo M, Raposo G, Théry C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2014;30:255–89. Epub 2014/10/08. pmid:25288114.
  32. 32. Freitas CP, Clemente I, Mendes T, Novo C. Trichinella spiralis: genome database searches for the presence and immunolocalization of protein disulphide isomerase family members. Journal of helminthology. 2016;90(1):62–7. Epub 2014/12/06. pmid:25475092.
  33. 33. Amit A, Vijayamahantesh , Dikhit MR, Singh AK, Kumar V, Suman SS, et al. Immunization with Leishmania donovani protein disulfide isomerase DNA construct induces Th1 and Th17 dependent immune response and protection against experimental visceral leishmaniasis in Balb/c mice. Molecular immunology. 2017;82:104–13. Epub 2017/01/09. pmid:28064069.
  34. 34. Valencia-Hernandez AM, Ng WY, Ghazanfari N, Ghilas S, de Menezes MN, Holz LE, et al. A Natural Peptide Antigen within the Plasmodium Ribosomal Protein RPL6 Confers Liver T(RM) Cell-Mediated Immunity against Malaria in Mice. Cell host & microbe. 2020;27(6):950–62.e7. Epub 2020/05/13. pmid:32396839.
  35. 35. Xu N, Bai X, Liu Y, Yang Y, Tang B, Shi HN, et al. The Anti-Inflammatory Immune Response in Early Trichinella spiralis Intestinal Infection Depends on Serine Protease Inhibitor-Mediated Alternative Activation of Macrophages. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2021;206(5):963–77. Epub 2021/01/27. pmid:33495238; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7887736.
  36. 36. Carroll MV, Sim RB. Complement in health and disease. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2011;63(12):965–75. Epub 2011/06/28. pmid:21704094.
  37. 37. Shao S, Hao C, Zhan B, Zhuang Q, Zhao L, Chen Y, et al. Trichinella spiralis Calreticulin S-Domain Binds to Human Complement C1q to Interfere With C1q-Mediated Immune Functions. Frontiers in immunology. 2020;11:572326. Epub 2020/12/18. pmid:33329535; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7710684.
  38. 38. Yang W, Li LG, Liu RD, Sun GG, Liu CY, Zhang SB, et al. Molecular identification and characterization of Trichinella spiralis proteasome subunit beta type-7. Parasites & vectors. 2015;8:18. Epub 2015/01/15. pmid:25582125; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4297437.
  39. 39. Johnson JL, Brown C. Plasticity of the Hsp90 chaperone machine in divergent eukaryotic organisms. Cell stress & chaperones. 2009;14(1):83–94. Epub 2008/07/19. pmid:18636345; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2673905.
  40. 40. Kaur J, Kaur T, Kaur S. Studies on the protective efficacy and immunogenicity of Hsp70 and Hsp83 based vaccine formulations in Leishmania donovani infected BALB/c mice. Acta tropica. 2011;119(1):50–6. Epub 2011/05/03. pmid:21530477.
  41. 41. Masilamoni JG, Vignesh S, Kirubagaran R, Jesudason EP, Jayakumar R. The neuroprotective efficacy of alpha-crystallin against acute inflammation in mice. Brain research bulletin. 2005;67(3):235–41. Epub 2005/09/08. pmid:16144660.
  42. 42. Wowk PF, Zardo ML, Miot HT, Goldenberg S, Carvalho PC, Mörking PA. Proteomic profiling of extracellular vesicles secreted from Toxoplasma gondii. Proteomics. 2017;17(15–16). Epub 2017/06/24. pmid:28643940.
  43. 43. Harris N, Gause WC. To B or not to B: B cells and the Th2-type immune response to helminths. Trends in immunology. 2011;32(2):80–8. Epub 2010/12/17. pmid:21159556; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3076625.
  44. 44. Zheng B, Lou D, Ding J, Zhuo X, Ding H, Kong Q, et al. GRA24-Based DNA Vaccine Prolongs Survival in Mice Challenged With a Virulent Toxoplasma gondii Strain. Frontiers in immunology. 2019;10:418. Epub 2019/03/22. pmid:30894865; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6414464.
  45. 45. Cui J, Han Y, Yue X, Liu F, Song YY, Yan SW, et al. Vaccination of mice with a recombinant novel cathepsin B inhibits Trichinella spiralis development, reduces the fecundity and worm burden. Parasites & vectors. 2019;12(1):581. Epub 2019/12/13. pmid:31829230; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6907330.
  46. 46. Matsumoto M. In vivo assay of IgE activities on the expulsion of intestinal adult worms. Parasitology international. 2016;65(5 Pt B):506–9. Epub 2016/02/20. pmid:26892104.
  47. 47. Wang N, Bai X, Tang B, Yang Y, Wang X, Zhu H, et al. Primary characterization of the immune response in pigs infected with Trichinella spiralis. Veterinary research. 2020;51(1):17. Epub 2020/02/23. pmid:32085808; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7035712.
  48. 48. Feng S, Wu X, Wang X, Bai X, Shi H, Tang B, et al. Vaccination of mice with an antigenic serine protease-like protein elicits a protective immune response against Trichinella spiralis infection. The Journal of parasitology. 2013;99(3):426–32. Epub 2012/12/21. pmid:23252743.
  49. 49. Sasai M, Yamamoto M. Innate, adaptive, and cell-autonomous immunity against Toxoplasma gondii infection. Experimental & molecular medicine. 2019;51(12):1–10. Epub 2019/12/13. pmid:31827072; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6906438.
  50. 50. Finkelman FD, Shea-Donohue T, Morris SC, Gildea L, Strait R, Madden KB, et al. Interleukin-4- and interleukin-13-mediated host protection against intestinal nematode parasites. Immunological reviews. 2004;201:139–55. Epub 2004/09/14. pmid:15361238.
  51. 51. Helmby H, Grencis RK. Contrasting roles for IL-10 in protective immunity to different life cycle stages of intestinal nematode parasites. European journal of immunology. 2003;33(9):2382–90. Epub 2003/08/26. pmid:12938214.
  52. 52. Pozio E. Searching for Trichinella: not all pigs are created equal. Trends in parasitology. 2014;30(1):4–11. Epub 2013/12/10. pmid:24314577.
  53. 53. Zhang N, Li W, Fu B. Vaccines against Trichinella spiralis: Progress, challenges and future prospects. Transboundary and emerging diseases. 2018;65(6):1447–58. Epub 2018/06/07. pmid:29873198.