Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the aetiological agents of non-malarial febrile illnesses in Africa

  • Martin Wainaina ,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    markimwa@gmail.com

    Affiliations Department of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya

  • David Attuy Vey da Silva,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

  • Ian Dohoo,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada

  • Anne Mayer-Scholl,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany

  • Kristina Roesel,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Dirk Hofreuter,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany

  • Uwe Roesler,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute for Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

  • Johanna Lindahl,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

  • Bernard Bett,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Sascha Al Dahouk

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany, Department of Internal Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

Abstract

Background

The awareness of non-malarial febrile illnesses (NMFIs) has been on the rise over the last decades. Therefore, we undertook a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of causative agents of non-malarial fevers on the African continent.

Methodology

We searched for literature in African Journals Online, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify aetiologic agents that had been reported and to determine summary estimates of the proportional morbidity rates (PMr) associated with these pathogens among fever patients.

Findings

A total of 133 studies comprising 391,835 patients from 25 of the 54 African countries were eligible. A wide array of aetiologic agents were described with considerable regional differences among the leading agents. Overall, bacterial pathogens tested from blood samples accounted for the largest proportion. The summary estimates from the meta-analysis were low for most of the agents. This may have resulted from a true low prevalence of the agents, the failure to test for many agents or the low sensitivity of the diagnostic methods applied. Our meta-regression analysis of study and population variables showed that diagnostic methods determined the PMr estimates of typhoidal Salmonella and Dengue virus. An increase in the PMr of Klebsiella spp. infections was observed over time. Furthermore, the status of patients as either inpatient or outpatient predicted the PMr of Haemophilus spp. infections.

Conclusion

The small number of epidemiological studies and the variety of NMFI agents on the African continent emphasizes the need for harmonized studies with larger sample sizes. In particular, diagnostic procedures for NMFIs should be standardized to facilitate comparability of study results and to improve future meta-analyses. Reliable NMFI burden estimates will inform regional public health strategies.

Author summary

Previous systematic reviews have highlighted the research priorities of causative agents for non-malarial febrile illnesses by counting the number of publications attributed to an agent. However, proportional morbidity rates are calculated by dividing the number of cases with a specific disease (numerator) by the total number of diagnosed fever cases (denominator) and are better indicators of the relative importance of aetiological agents in a population. Therefore, we present the leading causes of non-malarial febrile illnesses in African patients in both healthcare and community settings. Preference is given to HIV-negative patients when data could be found. We also determined summary estimates of Brucella spp., Chikungunya virus, Dengue virus, Haemophilus spp., Klebsiella spp., Leptospira spp., non-typhoidal Salmonella spp., typhoidal Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp.

The wide array of aetiological agents causing febrile illnesses on the African continent does not only complicate malaria control programs but may also hamper response to epidemic and pandemic illnesses such as Ebola and COVID-19. The harmonisation of diagnostics and study designs will reduce between-study differences, which may result in better estimates of disease burden on the continent and in the different African regions. This information is important for Pan-African surveillance and control efforts.

Introduction

There has been tremendous progress in the control of fevers that are attributable to Plasmodium falciparum in Africa [1]. So far, five countries on the continent have been certified as malaria-free [2]. This success is largely due to intensive control strategies such as the use of insecticide-treated bed nets, indoor residual spraying, and the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy for the treatment of clinical malaria cases [3]. Fever however remains commonly reported among patients in Africa and is even used as an indicator of health-seeking behaviour in many national health surveys [4]. Despite the widespread occurrence of non-malarial febrile illnesses (NMFIs) in various parts of the continent, the similarity of clinical features makes differential diagnosis difficult since pathognomonic signs are often missing [5]. This, along with inadequate laboratory diagnostic capacity [6], impedes good estimates of the burden of these infections. However, determining the burden of NMFIs promotes the establishment of targeted surveillance strategies, which in turn may help to reduce disease burden. As the malaria incidence reported in some African countries has recently increased [7], defining the burden of NMFIs will lessen complications in malaria control programs as well as raise awareness of their existence in communities [8,9]. Some NMFIs have also complicated the diagnosis of pandemic illnesses such as COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) and swine flu (H1N1), consequently posing serious public health threats in endemic areas [10,11].

Despite NMFI studies from Africa being extensively reviewed [1217] and their research focus explored [18], there is a lack of information on estimates of disease burden as well as on important determinants of the occurrence of NMFIs in fever patients. Proportional morbidity rates (PMr), which are calculated by dividing the number of diagnoses attributable to an aetiologic agent by the total number of diagnoses in a study, may close this information gap [19].

We, therefore, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of identifying pathogens commonly occurring in fever patients in Africa. Furthermore, we estimated PMr associated with these agents, which is useful in setting public health priorities by illustrating the relative importance of diseases in a population. Finally, we determined population and study characteristics that influenced the PMr of the aetiologic agents by meta-regression analyses.

Methods

The systematic literature review and meta-analysis was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines [20]. The PRISMA flowchart in Fig 1 shows a summary of the selection process. Literature was retrieved from five databases, namely African Journals Online (AJOL), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. To obtain unbiased results from the literature search, we used the following search terms: "undifferentiated" OR "unknown" OR "non*malaria*" AND "fever" OR "pyrexia" OR "hyperthermia" OR "febrile" AND "Africa". The syntax of search terms and Boolean operators are summarised in S1 Table. We set no time limit and allowed all languages. The searches were conducted between 22nd November and 24th December 2018. When full texts could not be found, MW contacted the study authors directly for a copy of the manuscript.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Systematic review process to select the studies relevant for meta-analysis of NMFIs in Africa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.g001

Literature screening and reviewing

References and their abstracts were imported into EndNote software (Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and the duplicate records were removed. Article titles and abstracts were reviewed for eligibility using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria by two of the co-authors independently (MW, DAVdS). In case of disagreement on whether a reference should be included or not, other co-authors (AMS, SAD) made the final decision. Observational studies in Africa focusing on humans with febrile illnesses that were initially undifferentiated, but aetiological agents were later determined by laboratory investigations were included. The following references were excluded: case reports, case series, books and book sections, grey literature, studies describing study populations not based in Africa, studies on travellers, studies on animals or insects, studies not focused on fever patients exclusively, studies investigating “fever of unknown origin” [21], studies not investigating fever agents, editorials and publications lacking original data, conference abstracts, conference proceedings, review articles, and outbreak investigations. We however included outbreak investigations that gave epidemiological descriptions, presenting information by demographic (e.g. gender, occupation, age), location, and/or temporal characteristics of the outbreaks [22].

Relevant articles not captured by our initial search but found in major reviews on the topic were added to the initial list of identified articles.

Risk of bias assessment

We assessed the quality of the studies using the criteria outlined in the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool [23] and Alonso et al. [24]. The studies were scored using a simple scale to assess the risk of bias. The quality criteria were aimed at judging whether studies had a clearly focused topic, chose their study populations reasonably, defined and detected cases appropriately, analysed data robustly, and presented results and discussed them clearly (S1 Text). Results of the scoring are presented in the supporting information (S1 Fig).

Data extraction, inclusion and extraction criteria

The authors jointly agreed on data to be extracted from the selected articles. Two reviewers added information from the full texts to an MS Excel file comprising the details described in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Variables extracted from the included studies and their detailed description.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.t001

We adopted the following guidelines for extracting data:

  1. (i.) Criteria related to agents. We did not extract data on co-occurring agents. We also did not include subsets of results if not all subsets within a group (such as species within a genus) had results presented. In such cases, the general results (such as for the genus) were extracted because they represented all the members within the group. Bacterial agents reported at levels higher than the genus (such as “coliforms”, “Enterobacteriaceae” or “Enterobacteria”) were not extracted. As some viruses (e.g., Adenoviruses) were commonly identified at levels higher than the genus, these were extracted and included in our tally of total agents (Figs 2 and 4 and Table 2). When agents were tested in more than one clinical sample (such as blood and urine), all these data were extracted. Data on infections diagnosed in blood were preferred in the total tally of agents in Africa as well as in the meta-analysis section. However, results from all samples tested were used in the total number of agents per sample tested.
  2. (ii.) Criteria concerning the number of patients positively tested for an agent and the diagnostic test used. When more than one number of positive cases were reported due to more than one cut-off point used (e.g. PCR results for Parvovirus B19 and Parvovirus B19 >1000 IU/ml), the number presented by the authors in the final report was included in our analyses. When samples were pooled for laboratory analysis and results therefore not presented based on individual patient samples, we regarded the number of pools as the total study size. Data on the incidence of aetiologic agents were not extracted. Only the proportion of positive cases determined during the study period was extracted. When patients were recruited over several years in a cross-sectional study, and each patient was sampled only once, patients and positive cases reported during the study period were summed up in total and the proportion of positive cases was calculated. When screening and confirmatory tests were used, results from the confirmatory test were extracted. When different tests were used for patient management and subsequent treatment and others for the epidemiological study of the agent of interest, results from the latter were extracted. We also preferentially included results from IgG assays as we regarded them to be more inclusive in diagnosing both acute and convalescent cases in studies that utilised serological assays detecting IgM and IgG antibodies. When no diagnostic assay and/or only the total number of positive cases were recorded in a study, the agent was not included in the extracted dataset.
  3. (iii.) Criteria concerning data on clinical signs and symptoms. We considered only data linked to a single agent of interest and not those reported for the entire study population when multiple agents were investigated. Additionally, we only extracted absolute numbers of agents linked to specific clinical signs and symptoms and not measures of association (such as odds ratios).
  4. (iv.) Criteria concerning data on patient and study characteristics. When multiple countries were included in a study, data were extracted per country and the countries of the study populations described in the article were deemed as all the countries involved. In such cases, data on agents not presented per country were not extracted. When studies comprised febrile and non-febrile cohorts with data on agents presented separately, data from the febrile cohorts were extracted. When data were combined, the paper was rejected. When a study included HIV-positive and -negative patients and data were presented by these subgroups separately, data on HIV-negative patients were extracted to minimize bias related to opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients. If this was not possible, data from both HIV-positive and -negative patients were extracted. We excluded data on febrile patients with diagnosed malignancies and on chemotherapy as immunocompromised states predispose these populations to infection. However, a separate study of common aetiological agents of non-malarial fevers in these populations would be more informative. When studies were based on the same population and agents reported more than once, albeit in different contexts (or not), we avoided extracting them more than once from the different publications. We assumed studies to be from the same population when expressly stated, or when dates and locations of sampling were the same. We confirmed this by checking any similarity of authors’ names. Lastly, we did not exclude any publications based on the age of study participants to be as inclusive as possible.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Number of studies per country included in meta-analysis of NMFIs in Africa.

Studies on populations from multiple countries were treated as separate studies. *Tallies from Tanzania and Zanzibar were combined in the image (OpenStreetMap contributors, http://geoportal.icpac.net/layers/geonode%3Aafr_g2014_2013_0).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.g002

Statistical analyses

Extracted data were entered into MS Excel and subsequently saved as individual comma-separated value files (.csv), imported, and merged in R statistical environment for analysis [25]. Bar charts were generated to present the percentage of fever cases testing positive for the different agents in the five African regions. Choropleth maps were created to show study countries on the continent. A heat map was produced to summarize clinical signs and symptoms. The samples tested for each agent were illustrated in chord diagrams (S2 Text). Boxplots were generated for various study characteristics and are presented in the supporting information (S4 Fig). Barplots for the quality assessment scores, the journal sources and publication years of included studies were also made (S1S3 Figs). We also subdivided the publication years into those before or during the year 2010 and those after as the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended the parasitological confirmation of all suspected malaria cases either by microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests in this year [26].

Meta-analyses

PMr were calculated by dividing the number of diagnoses attributable to an aetiologic agent by the total number of diagnoses in a study [19]. Selected pathogens with high PMr estimates and more than ten records identified by our systematic review were selected for the meta-regression analyses. These included Brucella spp., Chikungunya virus, Dengue virus, Haemophilus spp., Klebsiella spp., Leptospira spp., Salmonella spp. (non-typhoidal and typhoidal), Staphylococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. These pathogens served as indicator organisms in our review to investigate important determinants of PMr estimates. Random effects models were used to estimate the overall PMr and to quantify the heterogeneity (which refers to the amount of variation between the studies) evident for each outcome. The heterogeneity (Tau squared or τ2) was calculated using the restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method. The proportion of this variation that was not attributable to chance was also given using Higgin’s I2 statistic [27]. A Hartung-Knapp adjustment was used in the models to account for the low study numbers and any possible heterogeneity between studies that was substantial [28,29]. Forest plots were generated with the studies on each agent arranged in chronological order and subgroups were analysed to separate study results according to the diagnostics applied for pathogen detection (direct, indirect, or both).

Meta-regression analyses were performed on the selected aetiologic agents to determine how the study and population characteristics influenced the summary estimates and contributed to the variation between studies. Only studies that had non-zero reports of diagnoses were included and analyses were initially run for each of the selected agents using the variables indicated in Table 1. Mixed-effects models were applied to each of these nine variables using the metagen command and the REML method as the τ2 estimator. Statistical significance was set at p value <0.1.

The following variables were included using a backward elimination approach into the final multivariable mixed-effects meta-regression models: population status, African region, study end date (year), recruitment place, and diagnostics. The study end date was deemed a priori to be a potential confounder and was therefore forced into all models. The τ2 was estimated using the REML method and a Hartung-Knapp adjustment was included as well. Only variables with p values <0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

A factor analysis model of the quality assessment scores (risk of bias) was fitted to observe whether the results collectively reflected a single underlying latent variable that represents the "quality" of the studies included. The resulting eigenvalues did not support unidimensionality. Study quality scores were also analysed for each agent of interest using univariable analyses to identify questions that would be consistent predictors for all the agents, but none were found consistently significant. These scores were therefore not included in the meta-analyses any further.

Results

A total of 5730 studies were identified by our database searches and 133 articles representing 391,835 febrile patients were finally included in the systematic review. These articles were in English or French.

The selection process is summarised in Fig 1 and the countries represented by the included studies are shown in Fig 2. A summary of study and population characteristics is given in S2 Table. The questions we answered to assess the risk of bias for each study along with graphical summaries of the quality assessment scores are also presented in the supporting information (S1 Fig). The number of included studies increased over time (S2 Fig), especially after 2010, suggesting a greater research interest and awareness on non-malarial fevers after the WHO recommendation for parasitological confirmation of suspected malaria cases.

The quality assessment revealed that sample size calculation was uncommon and non-probability sampling methods were frequently used. A total of 86% of the studies lacked detailed information on both. Consequently, the studies in our review may have suffered from selection bias in terms of inclusion criteria for patients. Descriptive statistics of study populations were consistently found. However, in data analysis, control of confounding factors was lacking in 87% of the studies. The proportion of positive cases and measures of association were reported with precision ranges (i.e., confidence intervals (CI)) in only half of the studies. There were few studies (14%) that analysed paired samples taken in the acute and the convalescent phase of disease. In general, the scores assigned to the introduction of study topics (including scientific background, objectives, setting, location, and date of the study as well as clinical data collection methods) and discussion of results (summarising the key findings, giving limitations, interpreting, and comparing results with other studies as well as stating the generalisability of the findings (external validity)) were high. While fever cases were often accurately defined, specifically by providing a minimum body temperature, the duration of fever, accompanying clinical signs and symptoms, and how cases were diagnosed, the location of temperature measurement was not stated in 57% of the studies.

Our review included a wide range of patient ages, with the median (interquartile range) of the minimum and maximum reported ages being 1.0 (0.2–25.0) and 35.5 (12.8–72.0) years. A summary of the measures of central tendency and spread given for the ages of study participants is given in S4 Fig.

We also assessed whether studies had considered both cases (e.g. febrile patients) and controls (e.g. afebrile patients or those lacking certain clinical manifestations depending on the illness in question). We found descriptions of control groups in seven studies all of which were unmatched [3036].

A wide array of aetiologic agents were identified to cause fever (Fig 3 and Table 2), with bacteria and viruses predominating in differing amounts depending on the geographical region. Chord diagrams relating the agents detected to the sample type are presented in Fig 4A (bacteria) and Fig 4B (viruses, parasites, and fungi).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Aetiologic agents directly and/or indirectly detected in fever patients from different African regions.

Proportions of positive cases were calculated by dividing the number of cases diagnosed by any kind of laboratory method by the total number of samples tested in each African region.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Chord diagrams presenting the samples tested for the diagnosis of (A) bacterial infections and (B) viral, parasitic, and fungal infections.

Arc lengths represent the total numbers in each category. Blood samples comprised serum and plasma. Nasal swabs also included oro- and nasopharyngeal swabs and aspirates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.g004

thumbnail
Table 2. Most common aetiologic agents found in the reviewed literature to cause non-malarial febrile illnesses (NMFIs) based on number of publications.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.t002

The largest number of agents were reported from the Eastern Africa region with typhoidal Salmonella as the leading cause of febrile illnesses. Western, Northern, Central, and Southern African regions followed with decreasing numbers of agents identified and the major agents being Streptococcus spp., typhoidal Salmonella, Rickettsia spp. spotted fever group, and orthopneumoviruses, respectively. Infections were either diagnosed from normally sterile samples, such as blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, or from nasal secretion, sputum, stool, and pus as presented in Fig 4. The most important bacterial agents found in blood were typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella, Streptococcus spp., Escherichia spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Klebsiella spp. Viral agents diagnosed from blood samples were mostly flaviviruses and alphaviruses. In nasal swabs taken to prove upper respiratory tract infections, Streptococcus spp., enteroviruses, Haemophilus spp., Staphylococcus spp., influenza viruses, Moraxella spp., alphacoronaviruses, Pseudomonas spp., orthopneumoviruses, and bocaparvoviruses were most frequently found. Gastrointestinal infections diagnosed by stool samples were mostly caused by rotaviruses, Giardia spp., non-typhoidal Salmonella, Entamoeba spp., and Trichomonas spp. Urinary tract infections were typically diagnosed by the isolation of Escherichia spp., Klebsiella spp., and Staphylococcus spp. from urine samples. Neisseria spp., Streptococcus spp., Haemophilus spp. and Klebsiella spp. were responsible for infections of the central nervous system and were predominantly isolated from cerebrospinal fluid.

Clinical signs and symptoms accompanying fever and associated with aetiologic agents were available from only 30 out of 130 articles included in our study. Their description was often scanty or vague and tended to be non-specific for a single infectious disease. Some of the studies had zero reports of clinical signs and symptoms associated with agents. A heat map relating agents to clinical signs and symptoms is presented in Fig 5.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Heat map showing the occurrence of clinical signs and symptoms in patients infected with specific agents.

(shading represents the proportion of positive cases (%)). Clinical data were only added to the heat map when linked to a particular pathogen.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.g005

Forest plots with sub-groups according to the type of diagnostics used to identify pathogenic agents are presented in the supporting information (S5S14 Figs). Summary estimates of the selected agents were generally low, with the lowest being Haemophilus spp. (1.4%, 95% CI: 0.5–3.6) and the highest being Dengue virus (8.4%, 95% CI: 3.2–20.0). Significant heterogeneity was observed in all the analyses, with the least being for Brucella spp. (I2 = 94.6%, τ2 = 1.4) and the greatest being for Haemophilus spp. (I2 = 99.5%, τ2 = 5.3). Results of the summary and heterogeneity estimates as well as study characteristics and variables found significant in the meta-regression analyses are presented in Table 3. Further information on the results from multivariable analyses can be found in Table 4. The very high values of Higgin’s I2 reflect the fact that relative to the within-study variance, the between-study variance was really large. Results of the univariable meta-regression analyses are presented in the supporting information (S3 Table). In the final model, the diagnostic method was a significant predictor of PMr for typhoidal Salmonella (p value = 0.00) and Dengue (p value = 0.02). The population status was a significant predictor of PMr estimates for Haemophilus spp. (p value = 0.01). The study end date was a significant predictor of PMr estimates for Klebsiella spp. (p value = 0.04), and an increase in PMr estimates by 0.5% was observed with each additional year. The median end date of the studies on Klebsiella spp. was 2008 (interquartile range: 2000–2013). Two studies lacked a record of this date.

thumbnail
Table 3. Summary statistics of the studies investigating the agents included in meta-regression analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Results of the final multivariable meta-regression models of aetiologic agents.

Statistical significance was set at p value <0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.t004

Discussion

We reviewed the literature on the various NMFIs in Africa and summarised their occurrence in the five African regions. Three critical results were generated: (i) common aetiological agents of non-malarial fevers in Africa, (ii) summary effects for selected agents from meta-analyses and, (iii) important predictors of the proportional morbidity rates for these agents from meta-regression analyses. Findings from this review will inform the prioritisation of non-malarial febrile illnesses in Africa and provide important parameters to be carefully considered in future fever studies on the continent. Although we applied lenient inclusion criteria, only a few studies turned out to be eligible for our systematic review. The 133 studies finally included covered 25 out of 54 UN member states in Africa. The majority of studies were conducted in Eastern Africa, and other African regions were underrepresented. This underrepresentation stands out to particularly populous countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Investment in research on these illnesses in such countries will greatly improve our understanding of disease burden, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. The exposure of human populations to several NMFI agents has been demonstrated in DRC [147149]. This highlights the need for more collaborative research in African regions, especially outside Eastern Africa to gain deeper insights into the epidemiology of NMFIs [150]. The high number of publications in the Eastern Africa region could be explained by growing research interest in zoonoses. Recent reviews have highlighted a large number of foreign-led research projects on zoonoses in the Horn of Africa region [151,152]. We also observed generally more studies being performed after 2010 than the period before. This could have resulted from the more readily available malaria diagnostics which improved differential diagnosis of febrile illnesses on the continent, resulting in increased awareness of NMFI in the public health community. Among the included studies, our quality assessment revealed many studies being weak in patient selection methods, or in giving descriptions thereof. Data analysis methods were also found to be a potential source of bias. Therefore, we recommend adequate sample size calculations in future studies on NMFIs in Africa to enable the selection of statistically representative populations. We included studies investigating patients of any age in our review to be more inclusive. Despite several publications mentioning the age of study participants, many did not stratify the occurrence of the various agents by age groups. In the few that stratified, different age groups were used, making it difficult to summarise information on various agents with different age groups. We also found the age variable more often described by measures of central tendency and dispersion than being categorised into age groups. Consequently, we did not analyse the occurrence of agents in different ages, despite there being likely important differences in leading agents of non-malarial fevers in children and adults. For instance, acute respiratory infections have been demonstrated as leading causes of febrile illness in children under five years [36,49]. However, there exists a rising number of standardised protocols from large multi-centre studies investigating non-malarial fevers which offer an opportunity to harmonise this important source of study heterogeneity in Africa [101,105,153155]. Only a few studies included both cases and controls in the study design. Estimating the burden of non-malarial fevers in febrile patients can be confounded when the illness is endemic. The detection of these pathogens in febrile patients may therefore not necessarily mean clinical significance. Hence, the inclusion of control groups (e.g. afebrile patients) can help to minimise the chances of incidental findings. Given that only a few studies used such controls, it must be assumed that the pathogens diagnosed played a role in the febrile illnesses. The summary estimates for Dengue and Chikungunya viruses were comparable to what other meta-analyses had estimated among febrile patients in Africa [156,157]. Lower summary estimates for H. influenzae associated with bacterial meningitis were found [158] but estimates for febrile patients were not available. We also could not identify any summary estimates for Brucella spp., Klebsiella spp., Leptospira spp., typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. among febrile populations. Overall, we observed low summary estimates for most agents in our meta-analyses, probably resulting from the use of diagnostic tests with low sensitivity. The high levels of heterogeneity we observed for all agents likely arose from the variety of diagnostic methods in use on the continent [159].

We identified only a few protozoal and helminthic causes of fever in a total of seven studies. The disproportionate burden of some of these agents in HIV-positive patients [160,161] and their contribution to diarrhoeal diseases [162] should warrant their inclusion in future fever studies to better understand their public health impact. As we excluded results from HIV-positive patients in our review, we might have eliminated HIV-associated agents. Many of the studies in our review either had patients not tested for HIV or the study results not analysed separately according to HIV status, making it likely we inadvertently included HIV-positive patients in our analysis. HIV counselling and testing is recommended for the management of febrile illnesses in countries with endemic HIV transmission among adults and adolescents, due to the strong association of certain agents with an HIV-positive status [163]. Hence, there is a need for most African countries to adopt standardized protocols for the management of febrile patients so that important aetiologic agents are not overlooked, comparable to existing protocols for adults and adolescents in malaria-endemic countries [163].

The commonly used microbiological methods for diagnosing the different aetiologic agents varied considerably. The choice of diagnostic test was a significant predictor for typhoidal Salmonella spp. in the multivariable model. Culture and isolation are known to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of enteric fever [164] and allow for pathogen characterisation, which is important in understanding the epidemiology of bacterial infections. However, this approach is expensive, laborious, and time-consuming. In resource-scarce settings, serological diagnosis of infections from typhoidal Salmonella is therefore indispensable. Although these methods are suitable, a gold standard against which other serological tests can be compared is missing. Due to the large variety of tests and cut-offs in different populations, as well as cross-reactivity with other bacteria, results from serological tests are often inconsistent. Consequently, diagnostic methods contribute to the variation between studies in Africa and the high heterogeneity values observed. Similarly, the choice of diagnostic test was a significant predictor for Dengue PMr. A wide range of indirect detection methods such as neutralization, IgM and IgG ELISA and lateral flow assays were utilised in the included studies because of their lower costs as well as their reasonable sensitivity and specificity. Serological results however have to be interpreted with caution, carefully considering the timing of serum collection and the chance for following up a patient by paired sample testing in both the acute and the convalescent phase of infection [165]. A combination of indirect and direct detection methods could work well in harmonising diagnostic results across the continent. The establishment of tiered laboratory systems has been proposed in endemic countries to improve screening and confirmatory testing [166]. In the case of Dengue as well, variation in diagnostics may have contributed largely to the differences between studies. Because of the high heterogeneity observed, we did not perform publication bias analyses for any of the agents [159].

Population status was a significant predictor for Haemophilus spp. in the multivariable model. The majority of studies focussed on inpatients. However, studies that included both inpatients and outpatients identified Haemophilus spp. more frequently than those investigating outpatients only. This indicates that Haemophilus spp. were mainly identified after fever patients had been admitted to hospital. Therefore, primary intervention strategies such as Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) vaccination at healthcare centres, which has been linked to reduced numbers of infections in several African countries [167], are a viable option. In addition, there is a need for monitoring antibiotic resistance in H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae isolates to ensure effective treatment for febrile patients. Despite antibiotic resistance being reported in some studies, ciprofloxacin has been shown to be effective in treating bacteraemia associated with Haemophilus spp. and suitable for outpatients in Zanzibar [79].

The proportion of Klebsiella spp. cases was significantly associated with the study period. Each additional year increased the PMr estimates by 0.5%. Klebsiella pneumoniae is one of the Enterobacteriaceae classified as a high priority pathogen (critical) for research and development due to its increased resistance to carbapenems and third-generation cephalosporins [168]. Infections from these extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella spp. could lead to limited treatment options as well as treatment failures. This public health hazard may have been a reason for growing research interest in Africa over time. However, drivers of antibiotic resistance such as the misuse of antimicrobials in hospitals and agriculture may have simply increased the number of infections from these pathogens [169]. Harmonisation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance in priority bacteria is highly recommended across the African continent and on a global scale to effectively control infections difficult to treat [170,171].

Our systematic review had several limitations. (I) Since only a few studies were identified, our analyses may have lacked statistical power to detect factors affecting the PMr estimates of the many aetiologic agents under study. (II) Several agents important for Africa were not included in the meta-analyses because we deemed the number of corresponding studies too low. These comprised mycobacteria, rickettsia, protozoa, and helminths. However, the indicator agents included in our meta-analyses can inform the design of future studies. (III) The wide variety of diagnostic methods to identify the causative agents of febrile illnesses were potential sources of information bias in our review. We, therefore, merged diagnostic results at the genus level in most cases. However, the knowledge of infective species is still essential for refining pathogen-specific control measures. (IV) PMr might have been overestimated if multiple agents were assigned to the diagnosis of an individual patient. This may happen in studies investigating more than one agent in a population. However, single aetiology studies were less frequent (S2 Fig). (V) As we targeted HIV-negative patients in our review, we may have also included those with unknown HIV results since the majority of studies did not test for HIV or did not report on the HIV status of febrile patients. Additionally, some African countries such as those in Eastern and Southern Africa still have a high HIV/AIDS incidence, even though there has been a 43% reduction in new cases in the last 10 years largely because of the rollout of antiretroviral therapy by national HIV control programmes. [172,173]. Excluding HIV patients from our review could have left out a considerable amount of NMFI cases, because it is very likely that many people with acute HIV infection may seek care for febrile illnesses [5,174]. There still exists little data on the interaction between HIV and several febrile illnesses, but some opportunistic bacterial and fungal infections are disproportionately associated with HIV-positive patients [41,48,69,85,175]. Therefore, the strength of association of various emerging NMFIs and HIV is an important consideration for future fever studies on the continent.

In conclusion, NMFIs are quite common in fever patients in Africa. With the current COVID-19 pandemic, control of NMFIs has been impeded because (I) clinical presentations tend to overlap, (II) access to healthcare services is restricted as a result of physical distancing measures and the extra demand for personal protective equipment, and (III) the capacity of strained health systems is insufficient [176]. In addition, the prioritisation of COVID-19 by public health authorities could cause diagnostic and therapeutic delays for NMFIs leading to a higher disease burden. However, there is an opportunity to integrate locally endemic NMFIs in the control of pandemic diseases such as COVID-19.

To reduce the huge variation observed between available fever studies, harmonisation of methodology is needful, with particular respect to case definition, study design (considering sample size estimations to minimise selection bias), and use of diagnostic methods. This will help improve summary estimates in future meta-analyses for aetiologic agents of NMFIs and may also encourage more similar fever studies across the continent in order to reduce the regional bias observed in our review. Previously present public health threats such as endemic infectious diseases (especially malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis), non-communicable diseases, and accidents and injuries are being compounded by emerging and re-emerging infectious agents. Surveillance programs focusing on individual threats have been effective so far. However, with rising threats in resource-scarce settings, integrating disease surveillance and response systems can offer better public health outcomes [177]. Efforts led by the African Union to coordinate regional public health surveillance through the African Centres for Disease Control (Africa CDC) established in 2016 offer a great opportunity to strengthen and support African countries’ public health systems in surveillance, improving diagnostic capacity and promoting other public health practices in keeping with international targets such as the Sustainable Development Goals [6]. As these concerted efforts are already in motion for emerging pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, ebola viruses and AMR bacteria, a good chance for a coordinated response to NMFIs exists.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Summary of the search terms applied, to retrieve the literature for our systematic review from different databases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Summary of the characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Results (p values) of univariable meta-regression analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s003

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Distribution of the risk of bias scores for the studies included in our systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s007

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Distribution of included studies by publication year and type of study (whether more than one genus was investigated [multiple aetiologies study] or not [single aetiology study]).

The demarcating line on the x-axis (in blue) shows publication numbers before and after 2010 when the World Health Organisation recommended parasitological confirmation of suspected malaria cases (either through microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s008

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. Journal sources of the included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s009

(DOCX)

S4 Fig. Characteristics of the included studies and the populations represented.

These also represent the variables we created and used in the meta-regression analyses A. Age (in years) distributions in the study populations B. Minimum temperatures (in °C) measured in fever patients at different locations of the body C. Duration of fever (categories of 1 to 24 hrs up to 2 weeks) in the study populations (sample size) D. Status and number (sample size) of the recruited study participants E. Recruitment places of study participants (sample size) F. Study populations (sample size) recruited in different settings.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s010

(DOCX)

S5 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating typhoidal Salmonella (mostly comprised of Salmonella Typhi and S. Paratyphi) in order of increasing study year (referring to the end of sample collection).

The summary estimate for typhoidal Salmonella among 293,981 patients tested was 2.0% (95% CI: 1.3–3.1). Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 97.8%, τ2 = 1.8).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s011

(DOCX)

S6 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating non-typhoidal Salmonella (with identified serovars including Typhimurium, Enteritidis, Dublin, Infantis) in order of increasing study end year.

The summary estimate for non-typhoidal Salmonella among 292,792 patients tested was 1.6% (95% CI. 0.8–3.3). Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 99.5%, τ2 = 3.5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s012

(DOCX)

S7 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating Dengue virus presented by increasing study end year (Adedayo et al. lacked study end date).

The summary estimate for Dengue virus among 20,112 patients tested was 8.4% (95% CI: 3.2–20.0). Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 98.9%, τ2 = 4.8).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s013

(DOCX)

S8 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating Chikungunya virus presented by increasing study end year.

The summary estimate for Chikungunya virus among 18,080 patients tested was 4.5% (95% CI: 1.5–12.7). Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 98.8%, τ2 = 3.8).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s014

(DOCX)

S9 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating Haemophilus spp. (with identified species including H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae) presented by increasing study end year.

The summary estimate for Haemophilus spp. among 240,446 patients tested was 1.4% (95% CI: 0.5–3.6). Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 99.5%, τ2 = 5.3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s015

(DOCX)

S10 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating Staphylococcus spp. (with identified species including S. aureus and S. epidermidis) presented by increasing study end year (Adjei et al. lacked study end date).

The summary estimate for Staphylococcus spp. among 250,500 patients tested was 2.1% (95% CI: 1.4–3.3). Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 98.7%, τ2 = 2.1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s016

(DOCX)

S11 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating Streptococcus spp. presented by increasing study end year. The summary estimate for Streptococcus spp. among 241,560 patients tested was 3.2% (95% CI: 2.0–5.3).

Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 99.1%, τ2 = 2.9).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s017

(DOCX)

S12 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating Leptospira spp. presented by increasing study end year.

The summary estimate for Leptospira spp. among 7,182 patients tested was 3.2% (95% CI: 1.1–8.9). Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 95.5%, τ2 = 4.2).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s018

(DOCX)

S13 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating Brucella spp. presented by increasing study end year (Mustafa et al. lacked study end date).

The summary estimate for Brucella spp. among 16,717 patients tested was 3.5% (95% CI: 1.7–7.1). Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 94.6%, τ2 = 1.4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s019

(DOCX)

S14 Fig. Forest plot of studies investigating Klebsiella spp. presented by increasing study end year (Adjei et al. lacked study end date).

The summary estimate for Klebsiella spp. among 226,762 patients tested was 1.8% (95% CI: 1.0–3.1). Between-study heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 98.9%, τ2 = 2.3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144.s020

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank our colleagues Stefanie Lüth for the translation of the French literature, Matthias Flor for the chord diagrams, and Holger Brendebach for the faceted plot.

Registration and protocol

This review was not registered.

References

  1. 1. D’Acremont V, Lengeler C, Genton B. Reduction in the proportion of fevers associated with Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia in Africa: a systematic review. Malar J. 2010;9(1):240. pmid:20727214
  2. 2. World Health Organization. Countries and territories certified malaria-free by WHO 2019 [August 23, 2019]. Certification of malaria elimination, 1955–2019. https://www.who.int/malaria/areas/elimination/malaria-free-countries/en/.
  3. 3. Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526(7572):207–11. Epub 2015/09/17. pmid:26375008.
  4. 4. Battle KE, Bisanzio D, Gibson HS, Bhatt S, Cameron E, Weiss DJ, et al. Treatment-seeking rates in malaria endemic countries. Malar J. 2016;15(1):20. pmid:26754795
  5. 5. Crump JA, Gove S, Parry CM. Management of adolescents and adults with febrile illness in resource limited areas. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 2011;343:d4847–d. pmid:21824901.
  6. 6. Nkengasong JN, Maiyegun O, Moeti M. Establishing the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention: responding to Africa’s health threats. Lancet Global Health. 2017;5(3):e246–e7. pmid:28108138
  7. 7. World Health Organization. Update on the E-2020 initiative of 21 malaria-eliminating countries: report and country briefs. World Health Organization, 2018.
  8. 8. Chipwaza B, Mugasa JP, Mayumana I, Amuri M, Makungu C, Gwakisa PS. Community knowledge and attitudes and health workers’ practices regarding non-malaria febrile illnesses in eastern Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5):e2896. pmid:24852787
  9. 9. Nyaoke BA, Mureithi MW, Beynon C. Factors associated with treatment type of non-malarial febrile illnesses in under-fives at Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0217980. pmid:31194782
  10. 10. Yan G, Lee CK, Lam LT, Yan B, Chua YX, Lim AY, et al. Covert COVID-19 and false-positive dengue serology in Singapore. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020.
  11. 11. Hussain R, Al-Omar I, Memish ZA. The diagnostic challenge of pandemic H1N1 2009 virus in a dengue-endemic region: A case report of combined infection in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2012;5(2):199–202. pmid:22541269
  12. 12. Reddy EA, Shaw AV, Crump JA. Community-acquired bloodstream infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(6):417–32. pmid:20510282
  13. 13. Prasad N, Murdoch DR, Reyburn H, Crump JA. Etiology of severe febrile illness in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(6). pmid:26126200
  14. 14. Iroh Tam P-Y, Obaro SK, Storch G. Challenges in the etiology and diagnosis of acute febrile illness in children in low-and middle-income countries. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2016;5(2):190–205. pmid:27059657
  15. 15. Kiemde F, Spijker R, Mens PF, Tinto H, Boele M, Schallig HD. Aetiologies of non-malaria febrile episodes in children under 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2016;21(8):943–55. Epub 2016/05/10. pmid:27159214.
  16. 16. Maze MJ, Bassat Q, Feasey NA, Mandomando I, Musicha P, Crump JA. The epidemiology of febrile illness in sub-Saharan Africa: implications for diagnosis and management. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(8):808–14. pmid:29454844
  17. 17. Halliday JEB, Carugati M, Snavely ME, Allan KJ, Beamesderfer J, Ladbury GAF, et al. Zoonotic causes of febrile illness in malaria endemic countries: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(2):e27–e37. pmid:32006517
  18. 18. Elven J, Dahal P, Ashley EA, Thomas NV, Shrestha P, Stepniewska K, et al. Non-malarial febrile illness: a systematic review of published aetiological studies and case reports from Africa, 1980–2015. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):279. pmid:32951596
  19. 19. Dohoo IR, Martin SW, Stryhn H. Methods in epidemiologic research. Prince Edward Island: AVC Inc, University of Prince Edward Island; 2012.
  20. 20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. Epub 2009/07/22. pmid:19621072.
  21. 21. Wright WF, Mackowiak PA. 56—Fever of unknown origin. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases (Eighth Edition). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2015. p. 721–31.e1.
  22. 22. Dicker RC, Coronado Ft, Koo D, Parrish RG. Lesson 6: Investigating an Outbreak. Principles of epidemiology in public health practice; an introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics 3rd ed. Self-study course ; SS1000. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemiology Program Office, Office of Workforce and Career Development: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2006. URL https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/6914
  23. 23. CASP UK. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for cohort studies. 2016.
  24. 24. Alonso S, Lindahl J, Roesel K, Traore SG, Yobouet BA, Ndour APN, et al. Where literature is scarce: observations and lessons learnt from four systematic reviews of zoonoses in African countries. Anim Health Res Rev. 2016;17(1):28–38. pmid:27427191
  25. 25. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL https://www.R-project.org/. 2013.
  26. 26. World Health Organization. Diagnosis of malaria. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. Third ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
  27. 27. Higgins JP. Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(5):1158–60. pmid:18832388
  28. 28. Hartung J, Knapp G. On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses. Stat Med. 2001;20(12):1771–82. pmid:11406840
  29. 29. Hartung J, Knapp G. A refined method for the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome. Stat Med. 2001;20(24):3875–89. pmid:11782040
  30. 30. Akhuemokhan OC, Ewah-Odiase RO, Akpede N, Ehimuan J, Adomeh DI, Odia I, et al. Prevalence of Lassa Virus Disease (LVD) in Nigerian children with fever or fever and convulsions in an endemic area. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(7):e0005711. pmid:28671959
  31. 31. Botros BAM, Soliman AK, Salib AW, Olson J, Hibbs RG, Williams JC, et al. Coxiella burnetii antibody prevalences among human populations in north-east Africa determined by enzyme immunoassay. J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;98(3):173–8. pmid:7783275
  32. 32. Camara N, Ngasala B, Leyna G, Abade A, Rumisha SF, Oriyo NM, et al. Socio-demographic determinants of dengue infection during an outbreak in Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2018;20(2).
  33. 33. Maze MJ, Cash-Goldwasser S, Rubach MP, Biggs HM, Galloway RL, Sharples KJ, et al. Risk factors for human acute leptospirosis in northern Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(6):e0006372–e. pmid:29879114.
  34. 34. McCarthy M, Haberberger R, Salib A, Soliman B, El-Tigani A, Khalid I, et al. Evaluation of arthropod-borne viruses and other infectious disease pathogens as the causes of febrile illnesses in the Khartoum Province of Sudan. J Med Virol. 1996;48(2):141–6. pmid:8835346
  35. 35. Mourembou G, Lekana-Douki JB, Mediannikov O, Nzondo SM, Kouna LC, Essone JCBB, et al. Possible role of Rickettsia felis in acute febrile illness among children in Gabon. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(10):1808. pmid:26402580
  36. 36. O’Meara WP, Mott JA, Laktabai J, Wamburu K, Fields B, Armstrong J, et al. Etiology of pediatric fever in western Kenya: a case–control study of falciparum malaria, respiratory viruses, and streptococcal pharyngitis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92(5):1030–7. pmid:25758648
  37. 37. Adjei O, Opoku C. Urinary tract infections in African infants. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;24:32–4.
  38. 38. Afifi S, Earhart K, Azab MA, Youssef FG, El Sakka H, Wasfy M, et al. Hospital-based surveillance for acute febrile illness in Egypt: a focus on community-acquired bloodstream infections. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73(2):392–9. Epub 2005/08/17. pmid:16103611.
  39. 39. Akpede GO, Abiodun PO, Sykes RM. Pattern of infections in children under-six years old presenting with convulsions associated with fever of acute onset in a children’s emergency room in Benin City, Nigeria. J Trop Pediatr. 1993;39(1):11–5. Epub 1993/02/01. pmid:8445682.
  40. 40. Akpede GO, Abiodun PO, Sykes RM. Acute fevers of unknown origin in young children in the tropics. J Pediatr. 1993;122(1):79–81. Epub 1993/01/01. pmid:8419618.
  41. 41. Archibald LK, den Dulk MO, Pallangyo KJ, Reller LB. Fatal Mycobacterium tuberculosis bloodstream infections in febrile hospitalized adults in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(2):290–6. Epub 1998/03/21. pmid:9502444.
  42. 42. Ayoola O, Adeyemo A, Osinusi K. Aetiological agents, clinical features and outcome of septicaemia in infants in Ibadan. West Afr J Med. 2003;22(1):30–4. pmid:12769303
  43. 43. Ba O, Fleming JA, Dieye Y, wa Mutombo BM, Ba M, Cisse MF, et al. Hospital surveillance of childhood bacterial meningitis in Senegal and the introduction of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(6):1330–5. pmid:21118944
  44. 44. Bell M, Archibald LK, Nwanyanwu O, Dobbie H, Tokars J, Kazembe PN, et al. Seasonal variation in the etiology of bloodstream infections in a febrile inpatient population in a developing country. Int J Infect Dis. 2001;5(2):63–9. Epub 2001/07/27. pmid:11468099.
  45. 45. Brown B, Asinobi A, Fatunde O, Osinusi K, Fasina N. Evaluation of the nitrite test in screening for urinary tract infection in febrile children with sickle cell anaemia. Niger J Paediatr. 2004;31(1):10–3.
  46. 46. Christopher A, Mshana SE, Kidenya BR, Hokororo A, Morona D. Bacteremia and resistant gram-negative pathogens among under-fives in Tanzania. Ital J Pediatr. 2013;39(1):27. pmid:23657136
  47. 47. Commey J, Quarm-Goka B, Agyepong I. Persistent fever in severe malaria in children. Cent Afr J Med. 1994;40(9):257–60. pmid:7834716
  48. 48. Crump JA, Ramadhani HO, Morrissey AB, Saganda W, Mwako MS, Yang LY, et al. Invasive bacterial and fungal infections among hospitalized HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected adults and adolescents in northern Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(3):341–8. Epub 2011/01/11. pmid:21217181.
  49. 49. D’Acremont V, Kilowoko M, Kyungu E, Philipina S, Sangu W, Kahama-Maro J, et al. Beyond malaria—causes of fever in outpatient Tanzanian children. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):809–17. pmid:24571753
  50. 50. Decuypere S, Maltha J, Deborggraeve S, Rattray NJW, Issa G, Bérenger K, et al. Towards improving point-of-care diagnosis of non-malaria febrile illness: A metabolomics approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(3):e0004480. pmid:26943791
  51. 51. Dougle ML, Hendriks ER, Sanders EJ, Dorigo-Zetsma JW. Laboratory investigations in the diagnosis of septicaemia and malaria. East Afr Med J. 1997;74(6):353–6. Epub 1997/06/01. pmid:9487395.
  52. 52. Enyuma C, Meremikwu M, Udo J, Anah M, Asindi A. Malaria parasite positivity among febrile neonates. Niger J Paediatr. 2014;41(4):321–5.
  53. 53. Ephraim R, Nyame M, Sakyi S, Antoh E, Simpong D. Co-existence of malaria and urinary tract infection among children under five: A cross-sectional study of the Assin-South Municipality, Ghana. J Medical Biomed Sci. 2013;2(4):35–41.
  54. 54. Ghiorghis B, Geyid A, Haile M. Bacteraemia in febrile out-patient children. East Afr Med J. 1992;69(2):74–7. pmid:1505391
  55. 55. Gordon MA, Walsh AL, Chaponda M, Soko D, Mbvwinji M, Molyneux ME, et al. Bacteraemia and mortality among adult medical admissions in Malawi—predominance of non-typhi salmonellae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Infect. 2001;42(1):44–9. Epub 2001/03/13. pmid:11243753.
  56. 56. Hercik C, Cosmas L, Mogeni OD, Wamola N, Kohi W, Houpt E, et al. A combined syndromic approach to examine viral, bacterial, and parasitic agents among febrile patients: A pilot study in Kilombero, Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(2):625–32. Epub 2017/12/28. pmid:29280432.
  57. 57. Hercik C, Cosmas L, Mogeni OD, Wamola N, Kohi W, Omballa V, et al. A diagnostic and epidemiologic investigation of acute febrile illness (AFI) in Kilombero, Tanzania. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189712. pmid:29287070
  58. 58. Hogan B, Eibach D, Krumkamp R, Sarpong N, Dekker D, Kreuels B, et al. Malaria coinfections in febrile pediatric inpatients: a hospital-based study from Ghana. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(12):1838–45. pmid:29408951
  59. 59. Ibeneme C, Oguonu T, Ikefuna A, Okafor H, Ozumba U. Bacteriology of urinary tract infection and antimicrobial sensitivities in under-five children in Enugu. Niger J Paediatr. 2014;41(3):188–93.
  60. 60. Isendahl J, Manjuba C, Rodrigues A, Xu W, Henriques-Normark B, Giske CG, et al. Prevalence of community-acquired bacteraemia in Guinea-Bissau: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:3859-. pmid:25526763.
  61. 61. Kassa-Kelembho E, Mbolidi CD, Service YB, Morvan J, Minssart P. Bacteremia in adults admitted to the Department of Medicine of Bangui Community Hospital (Central African Republic). Acta Trop. 2003;89(1):67–72. Epub 2003/11/26. pmid:14636984.
  62. 62. Kibuuka A, Byakika-Kibwika P, Achan J, Yeka A, Nalyazi JN, Mpimbaza A, et al. Bacteremia among febrile Ugandan children treated with antimalarials despite a negative malaria test. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(2):276–80. Epub 2015/06/10. pmid:26055736.
  63. 63. Kiemde F, Tahita MC, Lompo P, Rouamba T, Some AM, Tinto H, et al. Treatable causes of fever among children under five years in a seasonal malaria transmission area in Burkina Faso. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7(1):60. pmid:29891004
  64. 64. Lepage P, Bogaerts J, Van Goethem C, Ntahorutaba M, Nsengumuremyi F, Hitimana DG, et al. Community-acquired bacteraemia in African children. Lancet. 1987;1(8548):1458–61. Epub 1987/06/27. pmid:2885453.
  65. 65. Mahende C, Ngasala B, Lusingu J, Butichi A, Lushino P, Lemnge M, et al. Bloodstream bacterial infection among outpatient children with acute febrile illness in north-eastern Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:289-. pmid:26138060.
  66. 66. Mava Y, Ambe J, Bello M, Watila I, Nottidge V. Urinary tract infection in febrile children with sickle cell anaemia. West Afr J Med. 2011;30(4):268–72. pmid:22669831
  67. 67. Mtove G, Amos B, Nadjm B, Hendriksen ICE, Dondorp AM, Mwambuli A, et al. Decreasing incidence of severe malaria and community-acquired bacteraemia among hospitalized children in Muheza, north-eastern Tanzania, 2006–2010. Malar J. 2011;10(1):320. pmid:22029477
  68. 68. Musa-Aisien A, Ibadin O, Ukoh G, Akpede G. Prevalence and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern in urinary tract infection in febrile under-5s at a children’s emergency unit in Nigeria. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2003;23(1):39–45. pmid:12648323
  69. 69. Musicha P, Cornick JE, Bar-Zeev N, French N, Masesa C, Denis B, et al. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infection isolates at a large urban hospital in Malawi (1998–2016): a surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(10):1042–52. Epub 2017/08/19. pmid:28818544.
  70. 70. Nadjm B, Mtove G, Amos B, Walker NF, Diefendal H, Reyburn H, et al. Severe febrile illness in adult hospital admissions in Tanzania: a prospective study in an area of high malaria transmission. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012;106(11):688–95. Epub 2012/10/02. pmid:23022040.
  71. 71. Ocheke O, John C, Ogbe P, Donli A, Oguche S. The febrile child: how frequent should we investigate for urinary tract infection. Niger J Paediatr. 2016;43(1):30–3.
  72. 72. Okwara FN, Obimbo EM, Wafula EM, Murila FV. Bacteraemia, urinary tract infection and malaria in hospitalised febrile children in Nairobi: is there an association? East Afr Med J. 2004;81(1):47–51. Epub 2004/04/15. pmid:15080516.
  73. 73. Onubogu UC, Anochie IC. Factors associated with bacteraemia in febrile, nonneonatal children <5 years old at the paediatric outpatient clinic of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. S Afr J Child Health. 2015;9(4):124–6.
  74. 74. Petit PL, Haarlem JV, Poelman M, Haverkamp MC, Wamola IA. Bacteraemia in patients presenting with fever. East Afr Med J. 1995;72(2):116–20. Epub 1995/02/01. pmid:7796750.
  75. 75. Preziosi M, Zimba TF, Lee K, Tomas M, Kinlin S, Nhatave-Paiva C, et al. A prospective observational study of bacteraemia in adults admitted to an urban Mozambican hospital. S Afr Med J. 2015;105(5):370–4. pmid:26242671
  76. 76. Rabasa A, Gofama M. Urinary tract infection in febrile children in Maiduguri North Eastern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2009;12(2). pmid:19764657
  77. 77. Sigauque B, Roca A, Mandomando I, Morais L, Quinto L, Sacarlal J, et al. Community-acquired bacteremia among children admitted to a rural hospital in Mozambique. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(2):108–13. Epub 2009/01/10. pmid:19131902.
  78. 78. Ssali FN, Kamya MR, Wabwire-Mangen F, Kasasa S, Joloba M, Williams D, et al. A prospective study of community-acquired bloodstream infections among febrile adults admitted to Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998;19(5):484–9. Epub 1998/12/22. pmid:9859962.
  79. 79. Thriemer K, Ley B, Ame S, von Seidlein L, Pak GD, Chang NY, et al. The burden of invasive bacterial infections in Pemba, Zanzibar. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30350. pmid:22363426
  80. 80. Walsh AL, Phiri AJ, Graham SM, Molyneux EM, Molyneux ME. Bacteremia in febrile Malawian children: clinical and microbiologic features. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19(4):312–8. Epub 2000/04/27. pmid:10783021.
  81. 81. Zenebe T, Kannan S, Yilma D, Beyene G. Invasive bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Jimma University specialized hospital, Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2011;21(1):1–8. pmid:22434980
  82. 82. Aarsland SJ, Castellanos-Gonzalez A, Lockamy KP, Mulu-Droppers R, Mulu M, White AC, et al. Treatable bacterial infections are underrecognized causes of fever in Ethiopian children. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;87(1):128–33. pmid:22764303.
  83. 83. Akpede GO, Abiodun PO, Sykes RM. Relative contribution of bacteraemia and malaria to acute fever without localizing signs of infection in under-five children. J Trop Pediatr. 1992;38(6):295–8. Epub 1991/12/01. pmid:1844088.
  84. 84. Archibald LK, McDonald LC, Nwanyanwu O, Kazembe P, Dobbie H, Tokars J, et al. A hospital-based prevalence survey of bloodstream infections in febrile patients in Malawi: implications for diagnosis and therapy. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(4):1414–20. Epub 2000/04/14. pmid:10762572.
  85. 85. Crump JA, Ramadhani HO, Morrissey AB, Msuya LJ, Yang LY, Chow SC, et al. Invasive bacterial and fungal infections among hospitalized HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected children and infants in northern Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16(7):830–7. Epub 2011/04/08. pmid:21470347.
  86. 86. El-Amin EO, Elbashir MI, Elamin OE, Mukhtar Y, Abdo H, Abdul-Rahman I, et al. The underlying aetiologies of coma in febrile Sudanese children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013;107(5):307–12. Epub 2013/04/16. pmid:23584374.
  87. 87. Hyams KC, Oldfield EC, Scott RM, Bourgeois AL, Gardiner H, Pazzaglia G, et al. Evaluation of febrile patients in Port Sudan, Sudan: isolation of dengue virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35(4):860–5. Epub 1986/07/01. pmid:3728800.
  88. 88. Lewis DK, Peters RP, Schijffelen MJ, Joaki GR, Walsh AL, Kublin JG, et al. Clinical indicators of mycobacteraemia in adults admitted to hospital in Blantyre, Malawi. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002;6(12):1067–74. Epub 2003/01/28. pmid:12546114.
  89. 89. Lundgren IS, Heltshe SL, Smith AL, Chibwana J, Fried MW, Duffy PE. Bacteremia and malaria in Tanzanian children hospitalized for acute febrile illness. J Trop Pediatr. 2015;61(2):81–5. Epub 2014/12/09. pmid:25505140.
  90. 90. Thriemer K, Ley B, Ame SS, Deen JL, Pak GD, Chang NY, et al. Clinical and epidemiological features of typhoid fever in Pemba, Zanzibar: assessment of the performance of the WHO case definitions. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51823. Epub 2013/01/04. pmid:23284780.
  91. 91. Bouyou-Akotet MK, Mawili-Mboumba DP, Kendjo E, Ekouma AE, Raouf OA, Allogho EE, et al. Complicated malaria and other severe febrile illness in a pediatric ward in Libreville, Gabon. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12(1):216.
  92. 92. Crump JA, Youssef FG, Luby SP, Wasfy MO, Rangel JM, Taalat M, et al. Estimating the incidence of typhoid fever and other febrile illnesses in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(5):539. pmid:12737736
  93. 93. Msaki BP, Mshana SE, Hokororo A, Mazigo HD, Morona D. Prevalence and predictors of urinary tract infection and severe malaria among febrile children attending Makongoro health centre in Mwanza city, North-Western Tanzania. Arch Public Health. 2012;70(1):4. pmid:22958592
  94. 94. O’Shea MK, Clay KA, Craig DG, Matthews SW, Kao RL, Fletcher TE, et al. Diagnosis of febrile illnesses other than Ebola virus disease at an Ebola treatment unit in Sierra Leone. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(5):795–8. pmid:25991466
  95. 95. Achonduh-Atijegbe OA, Mfuh KO, Mbange AH, Chedjou JP, Taylor DW, Nerurkar VR, et al. Prevalence of malaria, typhoid, toxoplasmosis and rubella among febrile children in Cameroon. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):658. pmid:27825318
  96. 96. Animut A, Mekonnen Y, Shimelis D, Ephraim E. Febrile illnesses of different etiology among outpatients in four health centers in Northwestern Ethiopia. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2009;62(2):107–10. Epub 2009/03/24. pmid:19305049.
  97. 97. Baba M, Logue CH, Oderinde B, Abdulmaleek H, Williams J, Lewis J, et al. Evidence of arbovirus co-infection in suspected febrile malaria and typhoid patients in Nigeria. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7(01):051–9. pmid:23324821
  98. 98. Chipwaza B, Mhamphi GG, Ngatunga SD, Selemani M, Amuri M, Mugasa JP, et al. Prevalence of bacterial febrile illnesses in children in Kilosa district, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(5):e0003750–e. pmid:25955522.
  99. 99. Feleke SM, Animut A, Belay M. Prevalence of malaria among acute febrile patients clinically suspected of having malaria in the Zeway Health Center, Ethiopia. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2015;68(1):55–9. Epub 2014/11/26. pmid:25420658.
  100. 100. Gordon MA, Graham SM, Walsh AL, Wilson L, Phiri A, Molyneux E, et al. Epidemics of invasive Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium infection associated with multidrug resistance among adults and children in Malawi. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(7):963–9. Epub 2008/05/01. pmid:18444810.
  101. 101. Marks F, von Kalckreuth V, Aaby P, Adu-Sarkodie Y, El Tayeb MA, Ali M, et al. Incidence of invasive salmonella disease in sub-Saharan Africa: a multicentre population-based surveillance study. Lancet Global Health. 2017;5(3):e310–e23. Epub 2017/02/15. pmid:28193398.
  102. 102. Nas F, Ali M, Yahaya A. Malaria and typhoid fever co-infection among febrile patients in Kumbotso Local Government Area Kano, Nigeria. BAJOPAS. 2017;10(2):122–5.
  103. 103. Onyango MD, Ghebremedhin B, Waindi EN, Kakai R, Rabsch W, Tietze E, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of clinical isolates Salmonella serovar Typhimurium in western Kenya. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009;3(9):685–94. Epub 2009/10/28. pmid:19858570.
  104. 104. Karsas M, Becker PJ, Green RJ. Serious bacterial infections in febrile young children: Lack of value of biomarkers. S Afr J Child Health. 2016;10(1):33–6.
  105. 105. Park SE, Pak GD, Aaby P, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Ali M, Aseffa A, et al. The relationship between invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease, other bacterial bloodstream infections, and malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62 Suppl 1:S23–31. Epub 2016/03/05. pmid:26933016.
  106. 106. Peters RP, Zijlstra EE, Schijffelen MJ, Walsh AL, Joaki G, Kumwenda JJ, et al. A prospective study of bloodstream infections as cause of fever in Malawi: clinical predictors and implications for management. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9(8):928–34. Epub 2004/08/12. pmid:15304000.
  107. 107. Sow SO, Diallo S, Campbell JD, Tapia MD, Keita T, Keita MM, et al. Burden of invasive disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b in Bamako, Mali: impetus for routine infant immunization with conjugate vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(6):533–7. Epub 2005/06/04. pmid:15933564.
  108. 108. Biggs HM, Bui DM, Galloway RL, Stoddard RA, Shadomy SV, Morrissey AB, et al. Leptospirosis among hospitalized febrile patients in northern Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85(2):275–81. Epub 2011/08/05. pmid:21813847 Hygiene annual meeting, Atlanta, GA, 3–7 November 2010, abstract 856.
  109. 109. Biscornet L, Dellagi K, Pagès F, Bibi J, de Comarmond J, Mélade J, et al. Human leptospirosis in Seychelles: A prospective study confirms the heavy burden of the disease but suggests that rats are not the main reservoir. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(8):e0005831. Epub 2017/08/29. pmid:28846678.
  110. 110. de Geus A, Wolff JW, Timmer VEA. Clinical leptospirosis in Kenya, II. A field study in Nyanza Province. East Afr Med J. 1977;54(3):125–32. pmid:885096
  111. 111. Guillebaud J, Bernardson B, Randriambolamanantsoa TH, Randrianasolo L, Randriamampionona JL, Marino CA, et al. Study on causes of fever in primary healthcare center uncovers pathogens of public health concern in Madagascar. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(7):e0006642. pmid:30011274
  112. 112. Hagen RM, Frickmann H, Ehlers J, Krüger A, Margos G, Hizo-Teufel C, et al. Presence of Borrelia spp. DNA in ticks, but absence of Borrelia spp. and of Leptospira spp. DNA in blood of fever patients in Madagascar. Acta Trop. 2018;177:127–34. Epub 2017/10/08. pmid:28986249.
  113. 113. Ribeiro P, Bhatt N, Ali S, Monteiro V, da Silva E, Balassiano IT, et al. Seroepidemiology of leptospirosis among febrile patients in a rapidly growing suburban slum and a flood-vulnerable rural district in Mozambique, 2012–2014: Implications for the management of fever. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;64:50–7. pmid:28893674
  114. 114. Waggoner J, Brichard J, Mutuku F, Ndenga B, Heath CJ, Mohamed-Hadley A, et al. Malaria and chikungunya detected using molecular diagnostics among febrile Kenyan children. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(3):ofx110. Epub 2017/07/14. pmid:28702473.
  115. 115. Yimer E, Koopman S, Messele T, Wolday D, Newayeselassie B, Gessesse N, et al. Human leptospirosis, in Ethiopia: a pilot study in Wonji. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2004;18(1).
  116. 116. Kaabia N, Rolain J, Khalifa M, Jazia EB, Bahri F, Raoult D, et al. Serologic study of rickettsioses among acute febrile patients in central Tunisia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1078(1):176–9. pmid:17114704
  117. 117. Ki-Zerbo G, Tall F, Nagalo K, Ledru E, Durand G, Patey O. Séroprévalence des rickettsioses et de la fièvre Q chez les patients fébriles à l’hôpital de Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso). Med Mal Infect. 2000;30(5):270–4.
  118. 118. Maina AN, Farris CM, Odhiambo A, Jiang J, Laktabai J, Armstrong J, et al. Q fever, scrub typhus, and rickettsial diseases in children, Kenya, 2011–2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(5):883. pmid:27088502
  119. 119. Ndip LM, Fokam EB, Bouyer DH, Ndip RN, Titanji VP, Walker DH, et al. Detection of Rickettsia africae in patients and ticks along the coastal region of Cameroon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71(3):363–6. pmid:15381820
  120. 120. Socolovschi C, Mediannikov O, Sokhna C, Tall A, Diatta G, Bassene H, et al. Rickettsia felis–associated uneruptive fever, Senegal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(7):1140. pmid:20587190
  121. 121. Thiga JW, Mutai BK, Eyako WK. High seroprevalence of antibodies against spotted fever and scrub typhus bacteria in patients with febrile Illness, Kenya. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(4):688. pmid:25811219
  122. 122. Woodruff P, Morrill J, Burans J, Hyams K, Woody J. A study of viral and rickettsial exposure and causes of fever in Juba, southern Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1988;82(5):761–6. pmid:2855284
  123. 123. Brown V, Larouze B, Desve G, Rousset J, Thibon M, Fourrier A, et al. Clinical presentation of louse-borne relapsing fever among Ethiopian refugees in northern Somalia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1988;82(5):499–502. pmid:3257078
  124. 124. Prabhu M, Nicholson WL, Roche AJ, Kersh GJ, Fitzpatrick KA, Oliver LD, et al. Q fever, spotted fever group, and typhus group rickettsioses among hospitalized febrile patients in northern Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(4):e8–e15. pmid:21810740
  125. 125. Ndip LM, Labruna M, Ndip RN, Walker DH, McBride JW. Molecular and clinical evidence of Ehrlichia chaffeensis infection in Cameroonian patients with undifferentiated febrile illness. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009;103(8):719–25. Epub 2009/12/25. pmid:20030996.
  126. 126. Adedayo F, Nioma I, Olanrewaju MB, Adeyinka A, Ebele A. Serological evidence of recent dengue virus infection among febrile children in a semi arid zone. Am J Infect Dis. 2013;9(1):7.
  127. 127. Baudin M, Jumaa AM, Jomma HJ, Karsany MS, Bucht G, Näslund J, et al. Association of Rift Valley fever virus infection with miscarriage in Sudanese women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Global Health. 2016;4(11):e864–e71. pmid:27692776
  128. 128. Chipwaza B, Mugasa JP, Selemani M, Amuri M, Mosha F, Ngatunga SD, et al. Dengue and Chikungunya fever among viral diseases in outpatient febrile children in Kilosa district hospital, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(11). pmid:25412076
  129. 129. de Araujo Lobo JM, Mores CN, Bausch DG, Christofferson RC. Serological evidence of under-reported dengue circulation in Sierra Leone. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(4). pmid:27116605
  130. 130. Ferede G, Tiruneh M, Abate E, Wondimeneh Y, Damtie D, Gadisa E, et al. A serologic study of dengue in northwest Ethiopia: Suggesting preventive and control measures. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(5). pmid:29852020
  131. 131. Hertz JT, Munishi OM, Ooi EE, Howe S, Lim WY, Chow A, et al. Chikungunya and dengue fever among hospitalized febrile patients in northern Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(1):171–7. pmid:22232469
  132. 132. L’Azou M, Succo T, Kamagaté M, Ouattara A, Gilbernair E, Adjogoua E, et al. Dengue: etiology of acute febrile illness in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, in 2011–2012. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015;109(11):717–22. pmid:26385938
  133. 133. Ngoi CN, Price MA, Fields B, Bonventure J, Ochieng C, Mwashigadi G, et al. Dengue and chikungunya virus infections among young febrile adults evaluated for acute HIV-1 infection in coastal Kenya. PLoS One. 2016;11(12). pmid:27942016
  134. 134. Onoja A, Adeniji J, Olaleye O. High rate of unrecognized dengue virus infection in parts of the rainforest region of Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2016;160:39–43. pmid:27140859
  135. 135. Ridde V, Agier I, Bonnet E, Carabali M, Dabiré KR, Fournet F, et al. Presence of three dengue serotypes in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso): research and public health implications. Infect Dis Poverty. 2016;5(1):23. pmid:27044528
  136. 136. Schoepp RJ, Rossi CA, Khan SH, Goba A, Fair JN. Undiagnosed acute viral febrile illnesses, Sierra Leone. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(7):1176. pmid:24959946
  137. 137. Massangaie M, Pinto G, Padama F, Chambe G, Da Silva M, Mate I, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characterization of the first recognized outbreak of Dengue virus-type 2 in Mozambique, 2014. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(2):413–6. Epub 2015/12/09. pmid:26643534.
  138. 138. Moore DL, Causey OR, Carey DE, Reddy S, Cooke AR, Akinkugbe FM, et al. Arthropod-borne viral infections of man in Nigeria, 1964–1970. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1975;69(1):49–64. Epub 1975/03/01. pmid:1124969.
  139. 139. Adam A, Seidahmed OM, Weber C, Schnierle B, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Reiche S, et al. Low seroprevalence indicates vulnerability of eastern and central Sudan to infection with chikungunya virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016;16(4):290–1. pmid:26974266
  140. 140. António VS, Muianga AF, Wieseler J, Pereira SA, Monteiro VO, Mula F, et al. Seroepidemiology of chikungunya virus among febrile patients in eight health facilities in central and northern Mozambique, 2015–2016. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018;18(6):311–6. pmid:29672219
  141. 141. Kinimi E, Patrick BN, Misinzo G. Serological evidence of chikungunya and malaria co-infection among febrile patients seeking health care in Karagwe district, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2018;20(4).
  142. 142. Hassanain AM, Noureldien W, Karsany MS, Saeed ES, Aradaib IE, Adam I. Rift Valley fever among febrile patients at New Halfa hospital, eastern Sudan. Virol J. 2010;7(1):97.
  143. 143. Thompson MG, Breiman RF, Hamel MJ, Desai M, Emukule G, Khagayi S, et al. Influenza and malaria coinfection among young children in western Kenya, 2009–2011. J Infect Dis. 2012;206(11):1674–84. Epub 2012/09/18. pmid:22984118.
  144. 144. Ngoi CN, Siqueira J, Li L, Deng X, Mugo P, Graham SM, et al. The plasma virome of febrile adult Kenyans shows frequent parvovirus B19 infections and a novel arbovirus (Kadipiro virus). J Gen Virol. 2016;97(12):3359. pmid:27902331
  145. 145. Dahmane A, Van Griensven J, Van Herp M, Van den Bergh R, Nzomukunda Y, Prior J, et al. Constraints in the diagnosis and treatment of Lassa fever and the effect on mortality in hospitalized children and women with obstetric conditions in a rural district hospital in Sierra Leone. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014;108(3):126–32. pmid:24535150
  146. 146. Bevilacqua N, Pane S, Vairo F, Nicastri E, Paglia MG, Ame SM, et al. Accuracy of indirect haemagglutination and western blot assays for the detection of anti-Schistosoma antibodies in non-severe febrile patients in two Tanzanian hospitals. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012;44(6):453–8. pmid:22263635
  147. 147. Ali E, Van Den Bergh R, D’hondt R, Kuma-Kuma D, De Weggheleire A, Baudot Y, et al. Localised transmission hotspots of a typhoid fever outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;28(1). pmid:29541325
  148. 148. Moyen N, Thirion L, Emmerich P, Dzia-Lepfoundzou A, Richet H, Boehmann Y, et al. Risk factors associated with Ebola and Marburg viruses seroprevalence in blood donors in the Republic of Congo. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(6):e0003833–e. pmid:26047124.
  149. 149. Laudisoit A, Iverson J, Neerinckx S, Shako J-C, Nsabimana J-MM, Kersh G, et al. Human seroreactivity against Bartonella species in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2011;4(4):320–2. pmid:21771478
  150. 150. Beaudry C, Mouton J. The next generation of scientists in Africa: African Minds; 2018.
  151. 151. Kemunto N, Mogoa E, Osoro E, Bitek A, Njenga MK, Thumbi S. Zoonotic disease research in East Africa. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):1–9.
  152. 152. Cavalerie L, Wardeh M, Lebrasseur O, Nanyingi M, McIntyre KM, Kaba M, et al. One hundred years of zoonoses research in the Horn of Africa: A scoping review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(7):e0009607. pmid:34270551
  153. 153. O’Brien KL, Baggett HC, Brooks WA, Feikin DR, Hammitt LL, Higdon MM, et al. Causes of severe pneumonia requiring hospital admission in children without HIV infection from Africa and Asia: the PERCH multi-country case-control study. Lancet. 2019;394(10200):757–79. pmid:31257127
  154. 154. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):209–22. pmid:23680352
  155. 155. Hopkins H, Bassat Q, Chandler CI, Crump JA, Feasey NA, Ferrand RA, et al. Febrile Illness Evaluation in a Broad Range of Endemicities (FIEBRE): protocol for a multisite prospective observational study of the causes of fever in Africa and Asia. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e035632. pmid:32699131
  156. 156. Simo F, Bigna J, Well E, Kenmoe S, Sado F, Weaver S, et al. Chikungunya virus infection prevalence in Africa: a contemporaneous systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health. 2019;166:79–88. pmid:30468973
  157. 157. Simo FBN, Bigna JJ, Kenmoe S, Ndangang MS, Temfack E, Moundipa PF, et al. Dengue virus infection in people residing in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–9.
  158. 158. Oordt-Speets AM, Bolijn R, van Hoorn RC, Bhavsar A, Kyaw MH. Global etiology of bacterial meningitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(6). pmid:29889859
  159. 159. Alonso S, Dohoo I, Lindahl J, Verdugo C, Akuku I, Grace D. Prevalence of tuberculosis, brucellosis and trypanosomiasis in cattle in Tanzania: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anim Health Res Rev. 2016;17(1):16–27. Epub 2016/07/18. pmid:27427190
  160. 160. Hung C-C, Ji D-D, Sun H-Y, Lee Y-T, Hsu S-Y, Chang S-Y, et al. Increased risk for Entamoeba histolytica infection and invasive amebiasis in HIV seropositive men who have sex with men in Taiwan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(2). pmid:18301730
  161. 161. O’Connor RM, Shaffie R, Kang G, Ward HD. Cryptosporidiosis in patients with HIV/AIDS. AIDS. 2011;25(5):549–60. pmid:21160413
  162. 162. Troeger C, Blacker BF, Khalil IA, Rao PC, Cao S, Zimsen SR, et al. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(11):1211–28. pmid:30243583
  163. 163. World Health Organization. WHO informal consultation on fever management in peripheral health care settings: a global review of evidence and practice. 2013.
  164. 164. Crump JA, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Gordon MA, Parry CM. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive Salmonella infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(4):901–37. pmid:26180063
  165. 165. Wiwanitkit V. Dengue fever: diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8(7):841–5. pmid:20586568
  166. 166. Jaenisch T, Junghanss T, Wills B, Brady OJ, Eckerle I, Farlow A, et al. Dengue expansion in Africa-not recognized or not happening? Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(10):e140487. pmid:25271370.
  167. 167. Gessner BD. Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine impact in resource-poor settings in Asia and Africa. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009;8(1):91–102. pmid:19093776
  168. 168. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):318–27. Epub 2017/12/26. pmid:29276051.
  169. 169. Holmes AH, Moore LS, Sundsfjord A, Steinbakk M, Regmi S, Karkey A, et al. Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):176–87. Epub 2015/11/26. pmid:26603922.
  170. 170. Tadesse BT, Ashley EA, Ongarello S, Havumaki J, Wijegoonewardena M, González IJ, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Africa: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):616. pmid:28893183
  171. 171. World Health Organization. Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (GLASS) report: early implementation 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 2020.
  172. 172. UNAIDS. Global AIDS update. Confronting inequalities. Lessons for pandemic responses from 40 years of AIDS. 2021.
  173. 173. WHO Africa. HIV/AIDS 2018 [14 October, 2021]. https://www.afro.who.int/health-topics/hivaids.
  174. 174. Sanders EJ, Mugo P, Prins HAB, Wahome E, Thiong’o AN, Mwashigadi G, et al. Acute HIV-1 infection is as common as malaria in young febrile adults seeking care in coastal Kenya. AIDS. 2014;28(9):1357–63. pmid:24556872
  175. 175. McDonald LC, Archibald LK, Rheanpumikankit S, Tansuphaswadikul S, Eampokalap B, Nwanyanawu O, et al. Unrecognised Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteraemia among hospital inpatients in less developed countries. Lancet. 1999;354(9185):1159–63. Epub 1999/10/08. pmid:10513709.
  176. 176. Bhatt M, Soneja M, Gupta N. Approach to acute febrile illness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Drug Discov Ther. 2020;14(6). pmid:33390566
  177. 177. Fall IS, Rajatonirina S, Yahaya AA, Zabulon Y, Nsubuga P, Nanyunja M, et al. Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy: current status, challenges and perspectives for the future in Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(4):e001427. pmid:31354972