Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Potential risk factors associated with seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii among pregnant women and HIV infected individuals in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Zewdu Seyoum Tarekegn ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    zewdusagera@gmail.com, zewdu.seyoum@uog.edu.et

    Affiliation Department of Paraclinical Studies, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

  • Haileyesus Dejene,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Veterinary Epidemiology and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

  • Agerie Addisu,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

  • Shimelis Dagnachew

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Paraclinical Studies, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

Abstract

Background

Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular and neurotropic apicomplexan protozoan parasite infecting almost all warm-blooded vertebrates including humans. To date in Ethiopia, no systematic study has been investigated on the overall effects of potential risk factors associated with seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii among pregnant women and HIV infected individuals. We intended to determine the potential risk factors (PRFs) associated with seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii from published data among pregnant women and HIV infected individuals of Ethiopia.

Methodology

An systematic review of the previous reports was made. We searched PubMed, Science Direct, African Journals Online, and Google Scholar for studies with no restriction on the year of publication. All references were screened independently in duplicate and were included if they presented data on at least two risk factors. Meta-analysis using the random or fixed-effects model was made to calculate the overall effects for each exposure.

Results

Of the 216 records identified, twenty-four reports met our eligibility criteria, with a total of 6003 individuals (4356 pregnant women and 1647 HIV infected individuals). The pooled prevalences of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies were found at 72.5% (95% CI: 58.7% - 83.1%) in pregnant women and 85.7% (95% CI: 76.3% - 91.8%) in HIV infected individuals. A significant overall effect of anti-Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity among pregnant women (p < 0.05) was witnessed with age, abortion history, contact with cats, cat ownership, having knowledge about toxoplasmosis, being a housewife and having unsafe water source. Age, cat ownership, and raw meat consumption were also shown a significant effect (p < 0.05) to anti-Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity among HIV infected individuals.

Conclusions

This review showed gaps and drawbacks in the earlier studies that are useful to keep in mind to design accurate investigations in the future. The pooled prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies was found to be higher among pregnant women and HIV infected individuals. This suggests that thousands of immunocompromised individuals (pregnant women and HIV infected patients) are at risk of toxoplasmosis due to the sociocultural and living standards of the communities of Ethiopia. Appropriate preventive measures are needed to reduce the exposure to Toxoplasma gondii infection. Further studies to investigate important risk factors are recommended to support the development of more cost-effective preventive strategies.

Author summary

Toxoplasma gondii is a cosmopolitan food and water-borne zoonotic protozoan parasite that able to infect almost all warm blooded vertebrates. It causes a considerable public health impact with higher burden in developing countries. Estimating pooled prevalence of Toxoplasma infection in high risk groups can draw health policy makers’ attention in planning a screening program and control needs. Several risk factors determine the circulation of Toxoplasma gondii between intermediate and final hosts. In this comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, we intended to determine the prevalence and associated potential factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women and HIV infected individuals of Ethiopia. We searched English electronic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, African Journals Online, and Google Scholar) for studies. Our review resulted in a total of 24 papers meeting the inclusion criteria. The studies were performed from 2007 to 2019 using a cross-sectional study design and with overall samples of 6003 individuals (4356 pregnant women and 1647 HIV infected individuals). The estimated pooled seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies using random-effect model was found to be 72.5% (95% CI: 58.7% - 83.1%) in pregnant women and 85.7% (95% CI: 76.3% - 91.8%) in HIV infected individuals. Risk factors: age, abortion history, contact with cats, cat ownership, having knowledge about toxoplasmosis, being a housewife and having unsafe water source were showed significant overall effect on Toxoplasma gondii infection rate in pregnant women. Age, cat ownership and raw meat consumption also showed significant overall effect on infection rate with Toxoplasma gondii in HIV infected individuals. The findings of this study are valuable to increase awareness among public health workers and educators regarding Toxoplasma gondii infection in high risk groups (pregnant women and HIV infected individuals) and risk factors that influence the occurrence of its infection. The findings also indicate a need for prenatal screening for early diagnosis and treatment.

Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular and neurotropic apicomplexan protozoan parasite infecting almost all warm-blooded vertebrates including humans. It causes serious and life-threatening diseases in immunodeficient individuals and developing fetuses [1]. Globally, it has been estimated to infect approximately 30% of the human population and cause considerable public health impacts with a higher burden in developing countries [2].

Food animals with infected tissue cysts are important sources of human infection. Humans can acquire the infection through three main pathways: 1) by eating raw or undercooked meat harbouring viable tissue cysts; 2) by ingesting contaminated water and food or soil with oocysts shed by cats to the environment and 3) congenital transmission from infected mother to the foetus during pregnancy [36]. Domestic and wild felids play an important role in the epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii because they are the only definitive hosts capable of excreting viable oocysts in their faeces [3]. They become infected with Toxoplasma gondii by eating infected tissues from intermediate hosts.

Infection in healthy individuals is usually asymptomatic and often results in the chronic persistence of cysts within host tissues [5]. But in immunodeficient patients (like HIV/AIDS patients), it can lead to life-threatening encephalitis owing to reactivation of latent infections [4,5,7,8]. Further, infection of pregnant women may result in miscarriage or spontaneous abortion or congenital infection that may cause severe pathological defects (hydrocephalus, foetal death, deafness, blindness, mental retardation, or neurological damage, intracranial calcification and retinochoroiditis) [7,8]. It has also been reported as a possible risk factor for personality shifts, epilepsy, bipolar disorder, a suicide attempt, car accident, and reduced intelligence or schizophrenia [9,10].

The epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection in immunocompromised individuals (pregnant women and HIV infected patients) showed considerable variation between continents and countries. Recent systematic reviews have assessed and estimated the global pooled prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies ranges from 1.1% to 33.8% in pregnant women [1113] and 3.24% to 44.22% in HIV infected individuals [1,14]. In Africa, the pooled infection rate ranges from 1.6% to 48.7% in pregnant women [13] and 0.61% to 44.9% in HIV infected individuals [1]. In Ethiopia, based on empirical data, the infection rate estimates of 18.5% - 96.3% have been reported in the different risk groups of the population [4,15,16].

Various risk factors (the socioeconomic status and cultural habits of the community, health care education and economic status, geographical factors, cat lifestyle and density, wildlife structure, climate conditions, the virulence and genotype of the parasite and mode of transmission) have been documented to affect the host-pathogen interaction [3,17,18]. Thus, control options for Toxoplasma gondii infection must rely on the vigorous evidence of the risk factors contributing to its circulation among hosts [19]. However, the relative effects of each noted factors have not been fully summarized, except their variations from area to area [17]. In Ethiopia, despite high public health significance of Toxoplasma gondii along with extensive practices of raw meat consumption, keeping of cat as pet animals, presence of stray cats and suitable climatic conditions maintaining the survival of the pathogen, no systematically organized reference data that can be used by policy makers and public health authorities to plan strategic prevention and control measures. Besides, due to the presence of fragmented reports, there is limited knowledge on the trend and prevalence with associated risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women and HIV infected individuals. A better understanding of the risk factors associated with the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection is important to plan and establish prevention measures. Therefore, to address these limitations and to draw the attention of researchers, public health authorities, stakeholders, policy makers and governments towards the public health importance of Toxoplasma gondii, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the potential risk factors (PRFs) associated with seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii from published data among pregnant women and HIV infected individuals of Ethiopia.

Methods

Search strategy

Literature searching was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (S1 Text) [20]. We searched PubMed, Science Direct, African Journals Online, and Google scholar databases with no restriction on the year of publication up to 30th November 2019. Article search was made using the searching terms: (Toxoplasmosis OR Toxoplasma infection OR Toxoplasma gondii OR T. gondii OR Toxoplasma) AND (Seroprevalence OR Prevalence OR Seroepidemiology) AND (Risk factors OR Potential factors) AND (Pregnant women) AND (Ethiopia). Also, keywords: (HIV infected individuals OR HIV/AIDS patients) were used. Moreover, unpublished thesis manuscripts were also accessed from Ethiopian Universities.

Inclusion criteria

We used the following inclusion criteria to confirm the eligibility of the searched papers: (1) original research articles and theses; (2) cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies that were reported seroprevalence and risk factors; (3) studies with full texts; (4) targeted study population: pregnant women and HIV infected individuals of Ethiopia; (5) studies with serological tests; (6) studies that provided the total sample size and the outcome of interest; and (7) studies published in the English language. Each paper that did not meet the above-mentioned criteria was excluded.

Data extraction

Initially, articles were screened based on their titles and abstracts following the predefined inclusion criteria. Then, articles that seem potential for eligibility were selected and downloaded in full text. The searched articles were reviewed and abstracted carefully by two independent reviewers to prove eligibility. Disagreements between reviewers were settled by discussion. For each article, the following information were extracted: first author, publication year, study year, location, study design, sampling method, sample size, study subject, diagnostic test, potential risk factors (exposure), number of positive and negative samples. Study effect size, the odds ratio, and their corresponding confidence intervals were also calculated from the extracted data (S1 Data).

Data on potential risk factors (PRF) such as place of residence, contact with a cat, ownership of a cat or dog, water source, consumption of raw meat, vegetables and milk, age (15–34 versus ≥35 years in pregnant women and ≥25 versus < 25 years in HIV infected individuals), occupational group, education level, soil contact, number of pregnancies and history of abortion, and gestation period were recorded. Study searching strategies and exclusion criteria are presented in detail in Fig 1. Mendeley version 1.19.5 was used to catalogue the initial literature search results and to manage citations. Microsoft Excel datasheet was used to code and manage all extracted information from all relevant studies.

thumbnail
Fig 1. PRISMA flow diagram used for study searching process.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.g001

Study quality assessment

The qualities of included papers were evaluated by two independent researchers using a quality assessment checklist (standard strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist (STROBE) [21]. This quality assessment checklist includes 22 items constituting various sections of the articles such as title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. The checklist included items assessing objectives, different components of the methods (e.g., study design, sample size, study population, bias, statistical methods), results, limitations, and funding of the studies. The assigned scores were determined from 0 to 44. Following the checklist (STROBE), searched papers were classified into 3 groups: low quality score (< 15.5), moderate quality (15.5–29.5), and high quality (30.0–44.0). S1 Table shows the checklist of the quality of the included studies [21].

Meta-analysis

The meta-analysis was performed according to the protocol noted by DerSimonian and Laird [22]. In brief, data on pregnant women and HIV infected individuals were analyzed separately. The Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) in pregnant women and HIV infected individuals were calculated for each study. Logit transformation was performed to transform study-level estimates to logit event estimates [23] using the formula: lp: ln [p/ (1-p)], where lp = logit event estimate; ln = natural logarithm; p = study level estimate/prevalence. The variance of the estimates was also computed using the formula: var (lp) = 1/np + 1/ (n-np), where var = variance and n = sample size. Then, the population/ weighed prevalence (WP) of Toxoplasma gondii infection in all study groups was calculated using the formula WP = ∑ (pi/var (pi)) /∑ (1/var (pi)). The pooled prevalence estimate was computed using the formula, p = exp (lp)/ (exp (lp) +1), where exp (lp) = exponential of the logit event estimate [23]. Also, meta-analyses were made to determine the effects of each identified PRF if at least two included studies reported data on the same risk factor. OR and its respective 95% CI were calculated for each risk factor. We used pooled odds ratios (OR) as a measure of effect to assess the overall effects of each PRF. The forest plot was employed to present the outcomes of the meta-analysis. Cochran’s Q-statistics and inverse variance index (I2) were computed to determine the heterogeneity and inconsistency among studies, respectively [24]. We considered the I2 values of 25, 50, and 75% as a low, medium, and high heterogeneity, respectively [25]. The tau statistics (τ 2) were used to assess the variance of the effect size estimates across the population of the study. Galbraith plot was also constructed to assess the heterogeneities of study level estimates. We used the random-effect model (if the p-value of the Q test was < 0.05 and I2 was >50%) to pool the estimations following the heterogeneity result. Besides, we used a random-effect model for risk factor assessment if we had five and above studies to accept the previous cutoff points [26]. Further, the funnel plot, Egger’s, and Begg’s tests [27] were performed to assess small study effects and publication bias. STATA software version 16 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) was used for meta-analyses.

Results

Search results and characteristics

We searched both published and unpublished (thesis) reports of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant and HIV infected individuals in Ethiopia. Our literature search period was commenced from August 2019 to November 2019. We retrieved 216 reports for Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant and HIV infected individuals. Of them, 24 papers were found to be eligible for the inclusion criteria and data extraction (Fig 1). All selected studies were performed between 2007 and 2019 using a cross-sectional study design with convenient, systematic, and simple random sampling procedures. The studies were undertaken from various regions of Ethiopia: Addis Ababa, Amhara, Oromia, Southern Nations and Nationalities of Peoples, Somali and Tigray. Further, the studies were performed using a latex agglutination test (LAT), Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and Enzyme immune assay (EIA) to detect anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies (Table 1 and Table 2). The total sample size of the included studies was 6003 individuals (4356 pregnant women and 1647 HIV infected individuals). Of them, 4243 were found to be seropositive for Toxoplasma gondii infection. The overall apparent infection rate in pregnant women and HIV infected individuals was 66% and 84%, respectively.

thumbnail
Table 1. List of included studies in meta-analysis on pregnant women.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. List of included studies in meta-analysis on HIV infected individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.t002

Meta-analysis and bias assessment

The random effect model with inverse-variance procedures showed an overall pooled seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii 72.5% (95% CI: 58.7% - 83.1%) in pregnant women and 85.7% (95% CI: 76.3% - 91.8%) in HIV infected people. A substantial heterogeneity among the studies on seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women was evidenced (I2 = 98.6%, Q-test = 970.24, df = 14, p < 0.001). Similarly, in HIV infected individuals, the heterogeneity amongst studies on anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies seropositivity was statistically significant (I2 = 94.8%, Q-test = 172.68, df = 9, p < 0.001). The forest plots for each study group are shown in Figs 2 and 3. The Galbraith plot assessment amongst studies on anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies seropositivity in pregnant women and HIV infected people (Fig 4) also revealed that most of the included reports are laid outside of the 95% confidence limit and provided clear evidence of the variability of reports.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Forest plot of the logit event rate estimate (lp) in pregnant women.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Forest plot of the logit event rate estimate (lp) in HIV infected individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4.

Galbraith plots for seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women (a) and HIV infected (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.g004

In our analysis, funnel plot observations (Figs 5, 6 and 7) and bias coefficients for studies published on anti- Toxoplasma gondii antibodies seropositivity in pregnant women (Egger’s test: b = 26.24, 95% CI: 10.13% - 42.35%, p = 0.004 and Begg’s test: p = 0.015) and HIV infected people (Egger’s test: b = 14.8, 95% CI: 9.44% - 20.2%, p < 0.001 and Begg’s test: p = 0.016) did confirm the presence of publication bias and small-study effects.

thumbnail
Fig 5.

Funnel plots of the logit event rate of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women (a) and HIV infected (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6.

Eggers’s publication bias plot (a) and Begg’s funnel plot (b) reports for pregnant women studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7.

Eggers’s publication bias plot (a) and Begg’s funnel plot (b) reports for HIV infected individual studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.g007

Potential risk factors with seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women

Nineteen potential risk factors (PRF) were identified and meta-analysis was made of thirteen of the fifteen included papers (Table 3). Of them, seven were shown a statistically significant effect on seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii (test for the overall effect, p < 0.05) with higher odds of outcome: “history of abortion” (OR: 1.52), “age ≥ 35 years” (OR: 2.93), “contact with cat” (OR: 1.50), “cat ownership” (OR: 2.35), “knowledge about toxoplasmosis” (OR: 0.13), “being a housewife” (OR: 1.58) and “unsafe water source” (OR: 1.55) as shown in Table 3 and S1 Fig.

thumbnail
Table 3. Potential risk factors and their overall effects on Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in pregnant women in Ethiopia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.t003

An increased odds of seropositivity was also observed in eight assessed PRFs with Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant women; though these were not statistically significant (p > 0.05): “blood transfusion” (OR: 1.13), “contact with soil” (OR: 1.1), “dog ownership” (OR: 1.21), “being HIV positive” (OR: 1.22), “more than one pregnancy” (OR: 1.30), “raw meat consumption” (OR: 1.23), “raw vegetable consumption” (OR: 1.36) and “living in rural areas” (OR: 1.46). Further, we were not able to determine the effect of educational status, farming activity, raw milk consumption, and religion at odds of Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant women (Table 3). Forest plots, funnel plots and single weight of each publication contributing to the overall risk factors are presented in S1 Fig.

Potential risk factors with seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii in HIV infected individuals

Thirteen potential risk factors were identified and meta-analysis was performed on seven of the included ten papers (Table 4). Of them, three were shown a statistically significant combined effect on Toxoplasma gondii infection seropositivity (test for the overall effect, p < 0.05): “age ≥25 years” (OR: 3.087), “cat ownership” (OR: 4.34) and “raw meat consumption” (OR: 2.43). On the other hand, six risk factors appeared to have higher odds of seropositivity but results have shown statistically insignificant overall effect (p > 0.05): “contact with cat” (OR: 1.37), “living as single” (OR: 1.20), “being illiterate” (OR: 1.1), “raw vegetable consumption” (OR: 1.14), “living in rural” (OR: 1.502) and “being female” (OR: 1.16) (Table 2). Besides, four risk factors: having “blood transfusion experience”, having “knowledge about toxoplasmosis”, “religion”, and having “unsafe drinking water source” were not appearing to influence the odds of seropositivity among HIV infected individuals (Table 4). Forest plots, funnel plots and single weight of each publication contributing to the overall risk factors are presented in S2 Fig.

thumbnail
Table 4. Potential risk factors and their overall effects on Toxoplasma seroprevalence in HIV infected individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.t004

Discussion

The pooled prevalence of seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii infection

Ethiopia has diversified climatic conditions favoring the survival of different parasites (like Toxoplasma gondii) affecting domestic animals and humans. On the other hand, Ethiopian communities are categorized by low resources, including poor drinking water supply, coupled with different domestic animals (cats, dogs, goats, sheep, cattle, camels, and equines). Further, the communities are accustomed to raw or undercooked meat feeding habits and poor hygiene practices potentially increase the risk of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Considering the above situations, synthesizing information using previous studies is crucial, particularly among pregnant women and HIV infected individuals to depict the pooled prevalence and associated risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Estimating country-level and regional pooled prevalence with associated risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection could play a central role in developing suitable strategies for Toxoplasma gondii infection diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and control in Ethiopia, especially in pregnant women and HIV infected individuals. As far as the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to determine the potential risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women and HIV infected individuals of Ethiopia. Importantly, Toxoplasma gondii is widespread in Ethiopia among the general population and immunodeficient patients, and the high seroprevalence indicates a significant risk of clinical toxoplasmosis. But, there is a lack of comprehensive systematic and documented data on the potential risk factors contributing to Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women and HIV infected individuals in Ethiopia.

In our study, the weighted overall prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies was estimated to be higher in pregnant women (72.5%) and HIV infected individuals (85.7%). This suggests that the probability of high risk for congenital and cerebral toxoplasmosis in Ethiopia. Similarly, in previous studies, a higher prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies was reported in Ethiopia: 81.4% of women of childbearing age [40], 80% of the factory workers [51] and 95.1% of hospitalized patients [52]. The pooled prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies from studies administered to the general population in Ethiopia was also found to be 74% [53]. In contrast, the present finding is higher than the global pooled prevalence estimates in pregnant women (1.1% to 33.8%) [11,13] and HIV infected individuals (3.24% to 44.2%) [1,5,14]. Significantly lower pooled seroprevalence reports in pregnant women and HIV/AIDS patients were also reported in Mexico (15.62% & 20.2%) [54], Iran (41% & 50.1%) [55,56] and Nigeria (40.3% & 31.7%) [57]. This variation might be attributable to the difference in local climatic situations which determine the survival of oocysts and favours the dissemination and sporulation of oocysts, nutritional habit, the status of public health and sanitary services, personal hygiene, sources of drinking water, socio-cultural differences, residence, stray or pet cat density and management, and levels of close contact with cats [1,7,13,17,5860]. Several studies have also shown the effects of close contact with the meat of infected animals, consumption of raw meat, vegetable, and contaminated water [1,13,56,6164]. Further, the infection rate has been reported to be influenced by education level, socioeconomic status, age groups, and local religious beliefs of the community [1,7,58,62,65,66].

Potential risk factor analysis on seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii

The epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection is dependent on various environmental factors (food habits, climate, sanitary status and contact with infected cat faeces), sociodemographic factors (age, sex, occupation, education, economic status, and residence) and parasite factors (virulence, genotype or behaviour). Of these factors, one has little effect on the epidemiological scheme of Toxoplasma gondii infection, but together, they can impact the distribution pattern of the disease in the globe and even within the same country [56,67].

Age is an important sociodemographic factor associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection. We observed significantly higher odds of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women and HIV infected individuals as the age of study subjects increasing. This in line with the studies that reported an increasing Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity with increasing age of study subjects [7,13,19,58,63,68]. This is also supported by various authors in the globe [67,6974]. The studies included in this review were also considered age as a potential factor [29,32,36,46]. This might be explained by the assenting interaction between an increase in age, with a prolonged risk of exposure to Toxoplasma gondii oocysts and viable tissue cysts (bradyzoites) from the meat of infected animals over time, with the long-lived immune response, the availability of divers transmission route and lack of community awareness [13,67,75]. This could also be due to that the older group could have a longer period of exposure to any of the risk factors [13,76,77]. Further, this might be due to the increasing tendency of the people to eat raw or undercooked meats, fast foods (burgers and sausages), and/or increasing close contact with pet cats as their age increases.

Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity has shown an association with the history of abortion (p < 0.05). This is consistent with the previous reports [76,7880]. Cats play a central role in the epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii and are major sources of viable oocysts for environmental contamination [3,7,74]. They can acquire the infection through the consumption of raw meat with tissue cysts (bradyzoites) from infected animals. After ingestion of one viable tissue cyst, cats can release millions of viable oocysts and increase the likelihood of pathogen transmission to the risk groups [56,63]. Being cat ownership, close contact with cats and abundance of cats are also considered to be the important drivers for Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans [17,58,74]. In this study, ownership of cats was found with a significantly higher combined odds ratio in both study targets. Contact with cats was also found with a significantly higher odds ratio in pregnant women. This suggests that ownership of cats or close contact with cats, coupled with frequent exposure to cat faeces, cats’ litter box management way or neglect of preventive measures (hand washing or wearing gloves) could increase the risk of infection to an appreciable level [17,40,56,62,67,74].

Toxoplasma gondii infection in high-risk groups such as pregnant women, HIV infected individuals, and cancer patients has been reported to be influenced by educational status and knowledge about toxoplasmosis [58,74]. Liu et al. [62] and Sun et al. [81] also stated that individuals with no knowledge and formal education are more likely to acquire Toxoplasma gondii infection. Other authors suggest that health education as a cost-effective intervention strategy for Toxoplasma gondii infection [17,62,74]. This is supported by our findings in which literacy and health knowledge are considered as protective factors. Similar findings also reported by other authors [43,44,62,63]. This might be attributed to that those with low/no formal education status may have less hygienic practice and they are more likely to acquire Toxoplasma gondii infection [58,62]. Lack of basic information about toxoplasmosis such as a source of infection, hygiene, raw meat/vegetable consumption, transmission route, and ignorance of the disease can maintain the risk of infection.

Previous reports have pointed out that Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence varies between various working groups. Certain working groups have more contact than others with Toxoplasma gondii directly or indirectly. The present meta-analysis reveals that housewives are a more vulnerable group with significantly higher Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence. Our results are in line with those studies done in Saudi Arabia and the United States [61,82,83]. Habitually, housewives spend more time taking care of pets, cooking, and tasting food at home during meal preparation, handling and chopping meat without wearing gloves, cleaning and washing vegetables, and engaging in gardening, mainly in the rural regions [64,67].

Published reports have documented that unhygienic drinking water is a considerable risk factor for Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans and animals [17,74]. In our review, unsafe drinking water has also shown a significant association with Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women but not in HIV infected individuals. This might be due to the contradicting findings of the included studies and wide confidence intervals. Hence, we considered the absence of tap water as an indicator of unsafe drinking water quality. However, this might not be necessarily true. The microbiological quality of well or spring water could be satisfactory for the majority of the time unless contamination events happen by flooding and contaminated animals [84,85].

Higher odds of Toxoplasma gondii infection was confirmed in pregnant women with risk factors like raw meat and vegetable consumption; though it was not significant. Similarly, raw meat consumption habit has shown significantly higher odds of Toxoplasma gondii infection in HIV infected individuals (p = 0.01). This is consistent with reports across the globe [37,62,74,8688]. The consumption of raw meat with tissue cysts and vegetables contaminated with sporulated oocysts are considerable sources of infection [63]. The risks of acquiring Toxoplasma gondii via contaminated meat with tissue cysts and vegetables with oocysts from contaminated soil and water vary with culture and feeding habits in various communities [17].

This systematic review and meta-analysis has certain limitations, including: (1) all studies were used cross-sectional study design, this may bias our risk factor analysis and hence, the result should be interpreted with caution; (2) all studies that exploring seroprevalence/ factors were drawn from limited samples of participants which may not represent the national seroprevalence, therefore extrapolative values and estimates for the identified risk factors should be assessed holistically; (3) lack of related risk factors evaluated by the majority of papers; (4) the number of eligible studies used for each risk factor analysis were also small; so the estimates of the risk factors were made accordingly; it might decrease the power of meta-analysis; (5) limited or lack of studies in many regions of Ethiopia, which reduce the representativeness of the pooled estimate; (6) lack of a standard questionnaire to gather suitable data in the country; (7) studies were performed with different serological tests without similar sensitivities and specificities, and (8) the results of available data were heterogeneous. However, the finding provides an insight into the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection and associated risk factors and may serve as reference paper to plan and establish control measures among pregnant women and other immunocompromised patients in Ethiopia.

In conclusion, as far as to the knowledge of the authors, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk factors associated with seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii among pregnant women and HIV infected individuals in Ethiopia. The results of this study showed that pregnant women and HIV infected individuals have a high risk of exposure to Toxoplasma gondii infection. The pooled prevalences of anti- Toxoplasma gondii antibodies were 72.5% in pregnant women and 85.7% in HIV infected individuals. This suggests that thousands of immunocompromised patients are at risk of toxoplasmosis due to the socio-cultural and living standards of the communities of Ethiopia. Risk factors (age, abortion history, contact with cats, cat ownership, having knowledge about toxoplasmosis, being a housewife and having unsafe water source) were shown significant overall effects on Toxoplasma gondii infection rate in pregnant women. Age, cat ownership, and raw meat consumption also showed significant overall effects on infection rate with Toxoplasma gondii in HIV infected individuals. The results of this study are appreciated to increase awareness among public health workers and educators regarding Toxoplasma gondii infection in high-risk groups (pregnant women and HIV infected individuals). Appropriate preventive measures are needed to reduce the exposure to Toxoplasma gondii infection. Further studies to investigate important risk factors are recommended to support the development of more cost-effective preventive strategies.

Ethical approval

None sought.

Supporting information

S1 Table. STROBE Statement-checklist (risk of bias criteria).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.s003

(DOC)

S1 Fig. Potential risk factors with estimated odds ratio and funnel plots for T. gondii seropositivity in pregnant women of Ethiopia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.s004

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Potential risk factors with estimated odds ratio and funnel plots for T. gondii seropositivity in HIV infected individuals of Ethiopia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008944.s005

(PDF)

References

  1. 1. Wang Z, Wang S, Liu H, Ma H, Li Z, Wei F, et al. Prevalence and burden of Toxoplasma gondii infection in HIV-infected people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV 2017a; 4: e177–e188.
  2. 2. Foroutan M, Dalvand S, Daryani A, Ahmadpour E, Majidiani H, Khademvatan S, et al. Rolling up the pieces of a puzzle: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of toxoplasmosis in Iran. Alex J Med 2018; 54: 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2017.06.003
  3. 3. Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, 2nd ed. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, New York; 2010
  4. 4. Dubey JP, Tiao N, Gebreyes WA, Jones JL. A review of toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Ethiopia. Epidemiol Infect 2012; 140: 1935–1938. pmid:22874099
  5. 5. Wang Z, Liu H, Ma Z, Ma H, Li Z, Yang Z, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in immunocompromised patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Microbiol 2017b; 8: 1–12. pmid:28337191
  6. 6. Abdelbaset AE, Hamed MI, Abushahba MFN, Rawy MS, Sayed ASM, Adamovicz JJ. Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity and the associated risk factors in sheep and pregnant women in El-Minya Governorate, Egypt. Vet World 2020; 13(1):54–60.
  7. 7. Jiang RL, Ma LH, Ma ZR, Hou G, Zhao Q, Wu X. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii among Manchu pregnant women in northeastern China. Microb Pathog 2018;123: 398–401. pmid:30063975
  8. 8. Paul E, Kiwelu I, Mmbaga B, Nazareth R, Sabuni E, Maro A, et al. Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in Northern Tanzania. Trop Med Health 2018; 46: 1–8. pmid:29317853
  9. 9. Dogruman-Al F, Aslant S, Alcan S, Customer S, Turk S. A possible relationship between Toxoplasma gondii and schizophrenia: a seroprevalence study. Int J Psychiatr Clin Pract 2009; 13:82–7. pmid:24946126
  10. 10. Chegeni TN, Sarvi S, Amouei A, Moosazadeh M, Hosseininejad Z, Aghayan SA, et al. Relationship between toxoplasmosis and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019; 13(4): e0007306. pmid:30969961
  11. 11. Rostami A, Riahi SM, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Gamble HR, Fakhri Y, Shiadeh MN, et al. Acute Toxoplasma infection in pregnant women worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019 13(10):e0007807. pmid:31609966
  12. 12. Bigna JJ, Tochie JN, Tounouga DN, Bekolo AO, Ymele NS, Youda EL. Global, regional, and country seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women: a systematic review, modelling, and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1):1–0. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69078-9
  13. 13. Rostami A, Riahi SM, Gamble HR, Fakhri Y, Nourollahpour Shiadeh M, Danesh M, et al. Global prevalence of latent toxoplasmosis in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26(6):673–683. pmid:31972316
  14. 14. Safarpour H, Cevik M, Zarean M, Barac A, Hatam-Nahavandi K, Rahimi MT, et al. Global status of Toxoplasma gondii infection and associated risk factors in people living with HIV. AIDS 2020 34(3):469–474. pmid:31714356
  15. 15. Awoke K, Nibret E, Munshea A. Sero-prevalence and associated risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, northwest Ethiopia. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2015; 8: 549–554. pmid:26276286
  16. 16. Tilahun B, Hailu Y, Tilahun G, Ashenafi H, Vitale M, Di Marco V et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans in East Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia. Epidemiol Infect 2016; 144: 64–71. pmid:29887984
  17. 17. Elsheikha HM. Congenital toxoplasmosis: priorities for further health promotion action. Public Health 2008;122(4):335–353. pmid:17964621
  18. 18. Darabus G, Hotea I, Oprescu I, Morariu S, Brudiu I, Olariu RT. Toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in cats and sheep from Western Romania. Revue Méd. Vét, 2011; 162 (6): 316–320
  19. 19. Ding H, Gao Y, Deng Y, Lamberton PHL, Lu D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in cats in mainland China. Parasit and Vectors 2017; 10: 27. pmid:28086987
  20. 20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Int J Sur 2010; 8(5): 336–341. pmid:20171303
  21. 21. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. The strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Prev Vet Med 2007; 45(4): 247–51. pmid:17941714
  22. 22. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177–88. pmid:3802833
  23. 23. Barendregt JJ, Doi S A, Lee YY, Norman RE, Vos T. A meta-analysis of prevalence: Theory and methods. J Epidemiol Community Health 2013; 67: 974–978. pmid:23963506
  24. 24. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Book Series. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., UK; 2008
  25. 25. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539–1558. pmid:12111919
  26. 26. Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Fixed or random-effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13:196–207. pmid:26355603
  27. 27. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. 1st edition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., UK; 2009
  28. 28. Biyansa A. Sero-epidemiology of toxoplasmosis among antenatal care attending pregnant women in selected hospitals in Central and South Gondar Zones, Ethiopia. MSc thesis, UoG, Gondar, Ethiopia; 2019
  29. 29. Teweldemedhin M, Gebremichael A, Geberkirstos G, Hadush H, Gebrewahid T, Asgedom SW, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii among pregnant women in Adwa district, northern Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19. pmid:30616531
  30. 30. Jula J, Girones G, Edao B, Deme C, Cebrian J, Butrón L, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women attending antenatal care in southern Ethiopia. Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31: 363–366. pmid:29978983
  31. 31. Ahmed M, Tilahun G, Berhe N, Yigeremu M, Fekade D. Seroprevalence of IgG and IgM anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Current Med Pharm Res 2017; 3(1): 1262–1269.
  32. 32. Negero J, Yohannes M, Woldemichael K, Tegegne D. Seroprevalence, and potential risk factors of T. gondii infection in pregnant women attending antenatal care at Bonga Hospital, Southwestern Ethiopia. Int J Infect Dis 2017; 57: 44–49. pmid:28167254
  33. 33. Negussie A, Beyene E, Palani S. Toxoplasmosis and Associated Risk Factors in Antenatal Clinic follow up Pregnant Women in Selected Health Institutes of Jigjiga, East Ethiopia. Int J Trop Dis Health 2017; 21: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJTDH/2017/31177
  34. 34. Yohanes T, Zerdo Z, Chufamo N, Abossie A. Seroprevalence and Associated Factors of Toxoplasma gondii Infection among Pregnant Women Attending in Antenatal Clinic of Arba Minch Hospital, South Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study. Transl Biomed 2017; 8: 1–7.
  35. 35. Abamecha F, Awel H. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women following antenatal care at Mizan Aman General Hospital, Bench Maji Zone (BMZ), Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16. pmid:26758905
  36. 36. Agmas B, Tesfaye R, Koye DN. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection and associated risk factors among pregnant women in Debre Tabor, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes 2015;8. pmid:25595848
  37. 37. Gelaye W, Kebede T, Hailu A. High prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma antibodies and the absence of Toxoplasma gondii infection risk factors among pregnant women attending routine antenatal care in two hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Infect Dis 2015; 34: 41–45. pmid:25759324
  38. 38. Hailu AH, Negashe KN, Tasew AT, Getachew MG, Sisay TS, Jibat TJ, et al. Sero–Prevalence, and Associated Risk Factors of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Pregnant Women and HIV/AIDS Patients in Selected Cities of Ethiopia. Banat's J Biotechnol 2014; 10: 17–29.
  39. 39. Endris M, Belyhun Y, Moges F, Adefiris M, Tekeste Z, Mulu A, Kassu A. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women attending in Northwest Ethiopia. Iran J Parasitol 2014; 9: 407–414. pmid:25678926
  40. 40. Gebremedhin EZ, Abebe AH, Tessema TS, Tullu KD, Medhin G, Vitale M, et al. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection in women of child-bearing age in central Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis 2013;13. pmid:23320781
  41. 41. Zemene E, Yewhalaw D, Abera S, Belay T, Samuel A, Zeynudin A. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and associated risk factors among pregnant women in Jimma town, Southwestern Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis 2012;12. pmid:22264216
  42. 42. Fewzia M. Sero-burden of Toxoplasma gondii and associated risk factors among HIV/AIDS patients in Armed Forces Referal and Teaching Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2016
  43. 43. Zeleke AJ, Melsew YA. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and associated risk factors among HIV-infected women within the reproductive age group at Mizan Aman General Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10. pmid:28126016
  44. 44. Tegegne D, Abdurahaman M, Mosissa T, Yohannes M. Anti-Toxoplasma antibodies prevalence and associated risk factors among HIV patients. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2016; 9: 460–464. pmid:27261854
  45. 45. Yesuf M K, Melese Z T. Prevalence of Toxoplasmosis in HIV/AIDS Patients in Mettu Karl Hospital. Am J Health Res 2015; 3(3): 183–188.
  46. 46. Yohanes T, Debalke S, Zemene E. Latent Toxoplasma gondii infection and associated risk factors among HIV-infected individuals at Arba Minch Hospital, south Ethiopia. AIDS Res Treat 2014; 2014. pmid:25431660
  47. 47. Walle F, Kebede N, Tsegaye A, Kassa T. Seroprevalence and risk factors for toxoplasmosis in HIV infected and non-infected individuals in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia. Parasit & Vectors 2013; 6. pmid:23324409
  48. 48. Muluye D, Wondimeneh Y, Belyhun Y, Moges F, Endris M, Ferede G, et al. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Associated Risk Factors among People Living with HIV at Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. ISRN Trop Med 2013; 2013: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/123858
  49. 49. Aleme H, Tilahun G, Fekada D, Berhe N, Medhin G. Seroprevalence of Immunoglobulin-G and Immunoglobulin-M Anti- Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection / Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Patients at Tikur Anbessa. J Infect Dis Ther 2013; 1: 1–5.
  50. 50. Shimelis T, Tebeje M, Tadesse E, Tegbaru B, Terefe A. Seroprevalence of latent Toxoplasma gondii infection among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected people in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes 2009; 2. pmid:19128452
  51. 51. Woldemichael T, Fontanet AL, Sahlu T, Gilis H, Messele T, De Rinke Wit TF et al. Evaluation of the Eiken latex agglutination test for anti-Toxoplasma antibodies and seroprevalence of Toxoplasma infection among factory workers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1998; 92: 401–403. pmid:9850391
  52. 52. Guebre-Xabier M, Nurilign A, Gebre-Hiwot A, Hailu A, Sissay Y, Getachew E, et al. Sero-epidemiological survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J 1993; 31: 201–208. pmid:8404885
  53. 53. Gebremedhin EZ, Tadesse G. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in animals and humans in Ethiopia. Parasite & Vectors. 2015; 8: 291. pmid:26017571
  54. 54. Galvan-Ramirez Mde L, Troyo R, Roman S, Calvillo-Sanchez C, Bernal-Redondo R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Toxoplasma gondii infection among the Mexican population. Parasite & Vectors 2012; 5:271. pmid:23181616
  55. 55. Ahmadpour E, Daryani A, Sharif M, Sarvi S, Aarabi M, Mizani A. Toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dev Ctries 2014; 8(12):1503–10. pmid:25500647
  56. 56. Foroutan-Rad M, Khademvatan S, Majidiani H, Aryamand S, Rahim F, Malehi A. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in the Iranian pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Trop 2016; 158: 160–169. pmid:26952970
  57. 57. Karshima SN, Karshima MN. Human Toxoplasma gondii infection in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data published between 1960 and 2019. BMC Public Health 2020; 20(1): 877. pmid:32505179
  58. 58. Abu EK, Boampong JN, Ayi I, Ghartey-Kwansah G, Afoakwah R, Nsiah P, Blay E. Infection risk factors associated with seropositivity for Toxoplasma gondii in a population-based study in the Central Region, Ghana. Epidemiol Infect 2014; 1–9. pmid:25373611
  59. 59. Brbosa IR, de Carvalho Xavier Holanda CM, de Andrade-Neto VF. Toxoplasmosis screening and risk factors amongst pregnant females in Natal, northeastern Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2009;103: 377–82. pmid:19211119
  60. 60. Bamba S, Cissé M, Sangaré I, Zida A, Ouattara S, Guiguemdé RT. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women from Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17: 1–6. pmid:28049444
  61. 61. Jones JL, Kruszon-Moran D, Wilson M, McQuillan G, Navin T, McAuley JB. Toxoplasma gondii infection in the United States: seroprevalence and risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 154(4): 357–365. pmid:11495859
  62. 62. Liu Q, Wei F, Gao S, Jiang L, Lian H, Yuan B, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women in China. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2009; 103: 162–166. pmid:18822439
  63. 63. Daryani A, Sarvi S, Aarabi M, Mizani A, Ahmadpour E, Shokri A, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in the Iranian general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Trop 2014; 137: 185–194. pmid:24887263
  64. 64. Alsammani MA. Sero-epidemiology and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii among pregnant women in Arab and African countries. J Parasit Dis 2016; 40: 569–579. pmid:27605750
  65. 65. Minbaeva G, Schweiger A, Bodosheva A, Kuttubaev O, Hehl AB, Tanner I, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in Kyrgyzstan: seroprevalence, risk factor analysis, and the estimate of congenital and AIDS-related toxoplasmosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7: e2043. pmid:23409201
  66. 66. Abbas IE, Villena I, Dubey JP. A review on toxoplasmosis in humans and animals from Egypt. Parasitol 2019; 1–25. pmid:31559938
  67. 67. Mizani A, Alipour A, Sharif M, Sarvi S, Amouei A, Shokri A, Daryani A et al. Toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in Iranian women and risk factors of the disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Health 2017; 45(1): 7. pmid:28413330
  68. 68. Al-Eryani SMA, Al-Mekhlafi AM, Al-Shibani LA, Mahdy MMK, Azazy AA. Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant women in Yemen: Factors associated with high seroprevalence. J Infect Dev Ctries 2016; 10: 667–672. pmid:27367017
  69. 69. Alzaheb R A. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and its associated risk factors among women of reproductive age in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Women Health 2018; 10: 537–544. pmid:30288126
  70. 70. Fan CK, Hung CC, Su KE, Chiou HY, Gil V, Ferreira MDR, Tseng LF. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection among inhabitants in the Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe. Tran R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2007; 101(11): 1157–1158. pmid:17606284
  71. 71. Domingos A, Ito LS, Coelho E, Lúcio JM, Matida LH, Ramos AN. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii igg antibody in HIV/AIDS-infected individuals in Maputo, Mozambique. Rev Saude Publica 2013; 47: 890–896. pmid:24626493
  72. 72. Tagwireyi WM, Etter E, Neves L. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic animals in southeastern South Africa. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 2019; 86: 1–6. pmid:31714140
  73. 73. Alvarado-Esquivel C, Estrada-Martínez S, Pizarro-Villalobos H, Arce-Quiñones M, Liesenfeld O, Dubey JP. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection in general population in a northern Mexican city. J Parasitol 2011; 97(1): 40–44. pmid:21348604
  74. 74. Gao XJ, Zhao ZJ, He ZH, Wang T, Yang TB, Chen XG, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women in China. Parasitol 2012; 139: 139–147. pmid:22054357
  75. 75. Rosso F, Les JT, Agudelo A, Villalobos C, Chaves JA, Tunubala GA, et al. Prevalence of infection with Toxoplasma gondii among pregnant women in Cali, Colombia, South America. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2008; 78(3): 504–508. pmid:18337350
  76. 76. Murebwayire E, Njanaake K, Ngabonziza JCS, Njunwa KJ, Jaoko W. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Kigali, Rwanda. Tanzan J Health Res 2017; 19: 2–9.
  77. 77. Rouatbi M, Amairia S, Amdouni Y, Boussaadoun MA, Ayadi O, Al-Hosary AAT. Toxoplasma gondii infection and toxoplasmosis in North Africa: A review. Parasit 2019: 26. pmid:30767889
  78. 78. Falusi O, French AL, Seaberg EC, Tien PC, Watts DH, Minkoff H, Cohen MH. Prevalence and predictors of Toxoplasma seropositivity in women with and at risk for human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35(11): 1414–1417. pmid:12439806
  79. 79. Kamal AM, Ahmed AK, Abdellatif MZM, Tawfik M, Hassan EE. Seropositivity of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women by ELISA at Minia university hospital, Egypt. Korean J Parasitol 2015; 53: 605–610. pmid:26537040
  80. 80. Nayeri T, Sarvi S, Moosazadeh M, Amouei A, Hosseininejad Z, Daryani A. The global seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in women who had spontaneous abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020; 14(3):e0008103. pmid:32168351
  81. 81. Sun X F, Liu PZ, Song YN, Zhang SJ, Ren JQ. Study on Toxoplasma infection among some pregnant women in Qingdao in 2005. Prev Med Tribune 2006; 12: 675–676.
  82. 82. Al-Qurashi AR, Ghandour AM, Obied OE, Al-Mulhim AA, Makki SM. Seroepidemiological study of Toxoplasma gondii infection in the human population in the Eastern Region. Saudi Med J 2001; 22: 13–18. pmid:11255603
  83. 83. Al-Qurashi AR. Seroepidemiological study of toxoplasmosis in rural areas in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 2004; 34(1): 23–34. pmid:15125514
  84. 84. Rufener S, Mäusezahl D, Mosler H, Weingartner R. Quality of drinking-water at source and point of the consumption-drinking cup as a high potential recontamination risk: A field study in Bolivia. J Health Popul Nutr 2010; 28(1): 34–41. pmid:20214084
  85. 85. Bouzid M, Kintz E, Hunter PR. Risk factors for Cryptosporidium infection in low and middle-income countries: A systemic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Negl Trop Dis 2018; 12(6) e0006553. pmid:29879110
  86. 86. Lopes FMR, Mitsuka-Breganó R, Gonçalves DD, Freire RL, Karigyo CJT, Wedy GF, et al. Factors associated with seropositivity for anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in pregnant women of Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2009; 104(2): 378–382. pmid:19430668
  87. 87. Jones JL, Dargelas V, Roberts J, Press C, Remington JS, Montoya JG. Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49: 878–884. pmid:19663709
  88. 88. Pappas G, Roussos N, Falagas ME. Toxoplasmosis snapshots: global status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and implications for pregnancy and congenital toxoplasmosis. Int J Parasitol 2009; 39: 1385–1394. pmid:19433092