http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2767-6188
Figures
Abstract
Although Mycobacterium leprae (M.leprae) is usually found in macrophages and nerves of the dermis of patients with multibacillary leprosy, it is also present in all layers of the epidermis, basal, suprabasal, prickle cells, and keratin layers. However, the mechanism by which M.leprae invades the dermis remains unknown, whereas the underlying mechanism by which M.leprae invades peripheral nerves, especially Schwann cells, is well defined. M. leprae binds to the α-dystroglycan (DG) of Schwann cells via the interaction of α-DG and laminin (LN) -α2 in the basal lamina, thus permitting it to become attached to and invade peripheral nerves. In the current study, we investigated the issue of how M.leprae is phagocytosed by human epidermal keratinocytes, neonatal (HEKn). LN-5 is the predominant form of laminin in the epidermis and allows the epidermis to be stably attached to the dermis via its interaction with α/β-DG as well as integrins that are produced by keratinocytes. We therefore focused on the role of LN-5 when M. leprae is internalized by HEKn cells. Our results show that M.leprae preferentially binds to LN-5-coated slides and this binding to LN-5 enhances its binding to HEKn cells. The findings also show that pre-treatment with an antibody against α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4 inhibited the binding of LN-5-coated M.leprae to HEKn cells. These results suggest that M. leprae binds to keratinocytes by taking advantage of the interaction of LN-5 in the basal lamina of the epidermis and a surface receptor of keratinocytes, such as α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4.
Author summary
In the current study, we investigated the issue of how M.leprae is phagocytosed by human epidermal keratinocytes, neonatal (HEKn). We focused on the role of LN-5, a predominant form of laminin of the epidermis, in the interaction of M. leprae with keratinocytes. Our results show that M. leprae preferentially binds to LN-5-coated slides and coating M.leprae with LN-5 enhanced its binding to HEKn cells. In addition, a pre-treatment with an antibody against α-DG, integrin-β1 or -β4 inhibited the binding of LN-5-coated M. leprae to HEKn cells. These results suggest that M. leprae binds to keratinocytes by taking advantage of the interaction of LN-5 in the basal lamina of the epidermis and a surface receptor of keratinocytes, such as α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4.
Citation: Jin S-H, Kim S-K, Lee S-B (2019) M. leprae interacts with the human epidermal keratinocytes, neonatal (HEKn) via the binding of laminin-5 with α-dystroglycan, integrin-β1, or -β4. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 13(6): e0007339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007339
Editor: Carlos Franco-Paredes, Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez, UNITED STATES
Received: March 24, 2019; Accepted: June 7, 2019; Published: June 24, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Jin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research was supported by grants from Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (5-2018-A0082-00005), Korea Ministry of Health & Welfare. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Leprosy, Hansen’s disease, is a chronic granulomatous disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Mycobacterium leprae (M.leprae). It mainly affects both the skin and peripheral nerves, resulting in the development of skin lesions, such as macules, plaques or nodules, and peripheral neuropathy [1]. M.leprae is usually found in macrophages and nerves of the dermal zone in patients with multibacillary leprosy [2].
In addition to the dermis, M.leprae can also be detected in the epidermis, sweat glands and hair follicles of patients with high bacteriological index (BI>4+) multibacillary leprosy [3]. Although leprologists generally believe that M.leprae is transmitted through the respiratory tract, compared to the skin route, Job et al. [4] reported that M.leprae was also present in the superficial keratin layer of the skin of lepromatous leprosy patients, suggesting that M.leprae may be transmitted from the intact skin of patients with lepromatous leprosy. It has been suggested that M.leprae is transmitted to the epidermis from rapidly growing granuloma in the upper dermis of patients with lepromatous leprosy [5]. Moreover, Lyrio et al. [6] reported that HaCaT, a human keratinocyte cell line, phagocytoses M.leprae and the M.leprae-phagocytosed keratinocytes produce cathelicidin, an antimicrobial peptide, as well as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. However, the mechanism responsible for the epidermis invasion by M.leprae is not known with certainty, whereas the underlying mechanism by which M.leprae invades peripheral nerves, especially Schwann cells, is well defined.
M. leprae invades Schwann cells by binding to the alpha (α)-dystroglycan (DG) of Schwann cells via the interaction of α-DG and laminin (LN)–α2 in the basal lamina that surrounds the Schwann cell-axon unit [7]. The DG complex in Schwann cells consists of α-DG and β-DG. α-DG serves as a receptor on the Schwann cell that interacts with extracellular LN-α2, and β-DG serves as a links between the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the intracellular cytoskeleton [8, 9]. The basement membrane (BM) surrounding Schwann cells is composed of LNs, collagen IV, and proteoglycans [10]. LN-2 (α2, β1, γ1 chains) is the most common form of laminin in the basal lamina that surrounds Schwann cell-axon unit [11]. It has been reported that M. leprae simultaneously binds to the globular domain of LN-α2 and α-DG, a surface receptor, of Schwann cells, indicating that LN-α2 mediates the attachment and invasion of M. leprae to peripheral nerve cells [12].
Thus, we hypothesized that M.leprae uses components of the ECM, which is bound to a cell surface receptor, for the invasion of keratinocytes, as shown in Schwann cells. LN-5 (α3, β3, γ2 chains) is a major component of the basal lamina between the epidermis and dermis, and mediates the stable attachment of the epidermis to the dermis via the formation of hemidesmosomes [13]. Keratinocytes bind to LN-5, collagen, and fibronectin via integrins including α2β1, α3β1 and α6β4 [14, 15]. In addition, α/β-DG is also expressed in keratinocytes that are present in all epidermal layers except for the corneal layer [16].
In the current study, we investigated the issue of how M.leprae is phagocytosed by human epidermal keratinocytes, neonatal (HEKn). Our results show that M.leprae preferentially binds to LN-5 and that coating M.leprae with LN-5 enhanced its binding to HEKn cells. Our results also show that a pre-treatment with an antibody against α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4 inhibited the binding of LN-5-coated M.leprae to HEKn cells, suggesting that the binding of M. leprae to keratinocytes is assisted by the interaction of LN-5 in the basal lamina of the epidermis and a keratinocyte surface receptor, such as α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All procedures related to animal research were conducted in accordance with the Laboratory Animals Welfare Act, the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Guidelines and Policies for Rodent experiment provided by the IACUC (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee) in school of medicine, the Catholic University of Korea (Approval number: CUMC-2017-0091-02). Human skin samples were obtained from patients who had upper lid blepharoplasties with no clinical evidence of inflammatory or immune diseases. These activities were undertaken after written informed consent was obtained from the donors, according to procedures approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital (KC10TISE0743) and the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Reagents and antibodies
Auramine O, H2O2, DAPI, Collagen IV and Fibronectin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Laminin-α2 (LN-α2, LN211-02) and laminin-5 (LN-5, ab42326) proteins were obtained from BioLamina (Matawan, NJ) and Abcam (Cambridge, MA), respectively. Antibodies against LN-5 (ab102539 for immunohistochemistry), integrin-β1 (ab24693 for immunocytochemistry and binding assay) and -β4 (ab133682 for immunocytochemistry and binding assay) were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Antibodies against LN-α2 (sc-55605 for immunohistochemistry), α-dystroglycan (α-DG, sc-53987 for immunocytochemistry and binding assays), integrin-β2 (sc-13548 for binding assays) and–β3 (sc-52589 for binding assays) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). CyTM5-conjugated secondary antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody were obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA).
Cultivation of Mycobacterium leprae
We have cultivated M.leprae by using the mouse foot-pad technique [17]. M.leprae Thai-53 was donated by Dr. Kenji Kohsaka, Sasakawa Research Center, Soi Bamrasnaradoon Hospital, Thailand. BALB/c nude mice were inoculated in the hind foot pad with 3x105 M.leprae. BALB/c nude mice were obtained from Orient Bio (Seong Nam, Gyunggi-do, Korea) and were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in the Department of Laboratory Animals, the Catholic University of Korea. Standard mouse chow (Ralston Purina, St Louis, MO) and water were provided ad libitum. At 6 months after M.leprae inoculation, edematous changes in the M.leprae-inoculated hind foot were visually detected. The foot-pads of M. leprae-infected BALB/c nude mice were treated with a potadine solution and washed with ice-cold Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS, Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd, MO) to remove exogenous contamination. The foot-pads were excised, cut into small pieces, and homogenized with a MACs isolator (Miltenyl Biotec, Teterow, Germany). The extract was filtered using a cell strainer (BD Falcon, Durham, NC) to remove tissue debris and the resulting solution was then centrifuged at 3,000 rpm (Rotanta 460R, Hettich, Japan) for 25 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of ice-cold DPBS and treated with 2 N sodium hydroxide for 5 min. The reaction mixture was neutralized by adding 13 ml of ice-cold DPBS (Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd, MO). After centrifugation and resuspension, acid-fast bacillus (AFB) staining was performed and the numbers of bacteria were counted by light microscopy under an oil immersion field using a procedure established by Shepard and McRae [18].
Cell cultures
Human primary epidermal keratinocytes from neonatal foreskin (HEKn) cells were acquired from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) and grown in EpiLife medium supplemented with 100 U/ml of penicillin, 100 mg/ml of streptomycin, 250 ng/ml of amphotericin B, 60 μM of calcium, and Human keratinocyte growth supplement (HKGS, Cascade Biologics; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). In the current study, to limit the differentiation of HEKn cells, we maintained HEKn cells in EpiLife medium supplemented with human keratinocyte growth supplement (HKGS, Cascade Biologics; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and not in fetal bovine serum. These cells were maintained in a state of proliferation and non-differentiation. The cells were passaged with a gentle TrypLE select (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) treatment followed by a trypsin neutralization solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The cells were plated on 6-well plates at 1 x 105 cells/well or onto 4-channel chamber slides (Lab-Tek II chamber slide, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at 5 x 104 cells/well and were grown until reaching 70% confluence.
Interaction of HEKn cells with M. leprae
The HEKn cells were cultured on coverslide in a 6-well plate. M.leprae was pre-incubated with LN-α2 (10 μg/ml) or LN-5 (2 μg/ml) in DPBS for 2 h at 37°C, followed by washing. The cells were incubated with M. leprae at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1, 20:1, 50:1 and 100:1 for 1 h at 37°C. After removing extracellular M. leprae by washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), M. leprae were stained with the AFB stain or Auramine O, and examined in an oil immersion field of a light microscopy or fluorescence microscopy.
Immunofluorescence assay
Immunofluorescent staining of paraffin-embedded skin tissues and cells was performed using standard methods with the minor modifications [19, 20]. Skin samples were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 4 h at room temperature prior to being embedded in paraffin and 4 μm thick sections were dewaxed and rehydrated in a series of graded alcohol solutions. The sections were incubated in 0.3% sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 min at 100°C and 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 10 min after which, they were rinsed with PBS and incubated in blocking solution [5% goat serum and 0.001% Tween-20 in tris-buffered saline (TBS)] for 20 min. The sections were then incubated overnight with an antibody against LN-α2 or LN-5 in an incubation solution (5% goat serum and 0.1% Tween-20 in TBS) at 4°C. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with a mouse CyTM5- or a rabbit CyTM5-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h.
HEKn cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The resulting fixed cells were then rinsed with PBS and incubated in blocking solution (5% goat serum and 0.001% Tween-20 in TBS) for 20 min. The cells were then incubated overnight with an antibody against α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4 in an incubation solution (5% goat serum and 0.1% Tween-20 in TBS) at 4°C. After washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with a mouse CyTM5- or a rabbit CyTM5-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h.
After staining with the secondary antibody, the tissue sections and cells were washed with PBS. Nuclei were counterstained for 5 min with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd, MO). The negative control was processed in the absence of the primary antibody. Immunofluorescence was visualized by confocal microscopy (LSM 510 Meta, Zeiss, Germany).
Bacterial adherence assays
In the assay for the binding of M.leprae to the ECM-coated culture plate, 4-channel chamber slides were coated, as described in a previous report [21]. The slides were coated with 0.1 μg/ml of LNs, type IV collagen, or fibronectin at room temperature overnight. Saline was used as a negative control. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 3 h at 37°C and the sample was then washed 5 times with DPBS. Ten microliters of a suspension of M.leprae (5 x 108 bacteria/ml) was added to each well, followed by incubation for 1 h at 37°C. Unbound bacteria were removed by washing 5 times with DPBS. After fixation with 2% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, the bacteria were stained with Auramine O. The level of Auramine O-labeled M. leprae that was bound to slide was determined using the ZEN program (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) under a LSM 510 Meta confocal microscopy (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
For assaying the binding of M.leprae to HEKn cells, the HEKn cells were cultured in 4-channel chamber slides and incubated overnight at 37°C under 5% CO2. For determining the M. leprae that was bound to HEKn cells, M. leprae was pre-incubated with 10 μg/ml LN-α2 or 2 μg/ml LN-5 for 2 h at 37°C before inoculation at MOI of 10:1, 20:1, 50:1 and 100:1. For the binding inhibition assay, HEKn cells were pre-incubated with an antibody against α-DG, integrin-β1, -β2, -β3 or–β4 for 2 h at 37°C before inoculation with M. leprae at an MOI of 100:1. After incubating the HEKn cells with M. leprae for 1 h at 37°C in 5% CO2, extracellular M. leprae were removed by washing 5 times with PBS and fixing in 2% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. M. leprae were labeled with the AFB stain and examined in the oil immersion field of a light microscopy.
Results
M.leprae was phagocytosed by HEKn cells
We initially investigated the issue of whether M.leprae is phagocytosed by HEKn cells. HEKn cells were incubated with M. leprae at MOI of 10:1, 20:1, 50:1 and 100:1, respectively, for 6 h at 37°C. At an MOI of 100:1, the percentage of M. leprae-phagocytosed cells was 77.4% and the average number of M.leprae per cell was determined to be 3 (Fig 1).
(A and B) HEKn cells were incubated with M. leprae at MOI of 10:1, 20:1, 50:1 and 100:1, respectively, for 6 h at 37°C. After removing extracellular M. leprae by washing, the sample was stained with the AFB stain. The percentage of M. leprae-phagocytosed cells and the number of M. leprae per a cell were determined in the oil immersion field of a light microscopy. Significance was calculated by one way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. *P <0.05 versus cells were incubated with M. leprae at an MOI of 10:1. (C) HEKn cells were incubated with M. leprae at an MOI of 100:1 for 6 h at 37°C. After removing extracellular M. leprae by washing, the preparation was stained with Auramine O. Nuclei were counterstained for 5 min with DAPI. Scale bar: 10 μm.
LN-5, but not LN-α2, was expressed in the basal lamina of the human epidermis and α-DG, integrin-β1 and -β4 were expressed in HEKn cells
We examined the expression pattern of LN-α2 and LN-5 in human skin. Consistent with previous reports [13], LN-5, but not LN-α2, was expressed in the basal lamina between the epidermis and dermis (Fig 2). We then examined the expression patterns of cell surface receptors in HEKn cells. As shown in Fig 3, HEKn cells expressed α-DG, integrin-β1 and -β4 on the cell surface.
Human skin was immunostained with an antibody against LN-α2 or LN-5. After washing with PBS, the skin samples were incubated with a mouse CyTM5- or a rabbit CyTM5-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h. Nuclei were counterstained for 5 min with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm.
HEKn cells were immunostained with an antibody against α-DG, integrin-β1 or -β4, respectively. After washing with PBS, the HEKn cells were incubated with a mouse CyTM5- or a rabbit CyTM5-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h. Nuclei were counterstained for 5 min with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm.
Coating of M. leprae with LN-5 enhanced the binding of M.leprae to HEKn cells
We then investigated the issue of whether M.leprae adheres to the immobilized extracellular matrix LN-5, collagen IV and fibronectin using a solid-phase bacterial-adherence assay. We used LN-α2 as a positive control since LN-α2 in Schwann cells basal lamina is known to be the primary target molecule for M.leprae [21].
The level of M. leprae binding was increased in the LN-α2- as well as the LN-5-coated slides, compared to collagen IV- and fibronectin-coated slides (Fig 4). We also examined the binding ability of LN-α2- or LN-5-coated M.leprae to HEKn cells. As shown in Fig 5, the coating of M. leprae with LN-α2 or LN-5 resulted in an increase in the number of M. leprae that had adhered HEKn cells (average number of adherent M. leprae to HEKn cells per 100 HEKn cells; 69.3±5.7 in LN-α2-coated M. leprae and 44.0±2.4 in LN-5-coated M. leprae in comparison with 35.0±3.2 in non-treated M. leprae).
(A and B) M. leprae (5 x 108) were overlaid onto LN-α2, LN-5, collagen IV, or fibronectin- coated 4-chamber slides and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After removing unattached M. leprae by washing, the M. leprae were stained with Auramine O. The level of binding activity of M. leprae to ECM-coated slides was determined by measuring Auramine O fluorescence activity. *P <0.05 between the indicated groups. Scale bar: 20 μm.
(A and B) HEKn cells were incubated with LN-α2- (A) or LN-5- (B) coated M. leprae at MOI of 10:1, 20:1, 50:1 and 100:1, respectively, for 1 h at 37°C. After removing unattached M. leprae by washing, the samples were stained with the AFB stain. The number of M. leprae–bound cells per 100 HEKn cells was determined in the oil immersion field of light microscopy. *P <0.05 between the indicated groups.
Pre-treatment with antibody against α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4, inhibited binding of LN-5-coated M.leprae to HEKn cells
Rambukkana et al. [7] reported that when M. lerpae, that had been coated with the recombinant globular domain of LN-α2 (LN-α2G), were pre-incubated with recombinant α-DG, the LN-α2G/α-DG-mediated M.leprae binding to rat Schwann cells was competitively inhibited, suggesting the existence of a linkage between LN-α2 and α-DG in the interaction of M.leprae with Schwann cells. In the current study, although LN-α2 is not expressed in skin, we employed the LN-α2/α-DG-mediated M.leprae binding to cells as a positive control in the binding assay. Consistent with Rambukkana et al.’s results [7], our result also showed that the pre-treatment of HEKn cells with an anti-α-DG antibody inhibited the binding of LN-α2-coated M.leprae to HEKn cells (Fig 6A). In addition, the pre-treatment of HEKn cells with antibody against α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4, all of which are expressed on the surface of HEKn cells (Fig 3), inhibited LN-5-coated M. leprae from binding to HEKn cells (Fig 6B and 6C). However, pre-treatment with antibody against integrin-β2 or -β3 had no effect on inhibiting the binding of LN-5-coated M.leprae to HEKn cells (Fig 6B). These results suggest that M. leprae binds to keratinocytes by taking advantage of the interaction of LN-5 in the basal lamina of the epidermis and a surface receptor of keratinocytes, such as α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4.
(A) HEKn cells were pre-treated with an antibody against α-DG at the indicated dilution ratio for 1 h, and then further incubated with LN-α2-coated M. leprae at an MOI of 100:1 for 1 h at 37°C. (B and C) HEKn cells were pre-treated with an antibody against α-DG, integrin-β1, -β2, -β3, or -β4, at the dilution ratio 1:1,000 (B) and at the indicated dilution ratio (C) for 1 h. HEKn cells were then incubated with LN-5-coated M. leprae at an MOI of 100:1 for 1 h at 37°C. After unattached M. leprae were washed away, M. leprae were stained with the AFB stain. The number of M. leprae–bound cells per 100 HEKn cells was determined in the oil immersion field of light microscopy. *P <0.05 between the indicated groups.
Discussion
ECM is an acellular proteinaceous fraction of the tissues. ECM proteins consist of collagen, elastin, fibrillin, LNs, fibronectin, vitronectin, thrombospondin, proteoglycans and hyaluronic acid. ECM is involved in the structural support of tissues as well as various cellular signaling processes, including cell adhesion, migration, growth, and differentiation [22]. Although pathogens need to breach and degrade ECM proteins in order to successfully invade a tissue, they also utilize ECM proteins to aid in their adhesion to host tissues. LNs and collagens are major target glycoproteins of various pathogens, such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses, for adhesion to cells of host tissue [23].
LNs are heterotrimeric glycoproteins that consist of α, β and γ chain. The chains, α, β and γ, which are connected to one another via disulfide bonds at their C-terminal regions, form a triple coiled-coil region, resulting in a ‘crucifix’-shaped structure [23]. There are currently five α chain, three β chain and three γ chain isoforms and 16 LN isoforms have been identified in humans [24]. LN isoforms are differentially distributed in human tissues or cells [23]. LN-2 (α2,β1,γ1 chains) is a predominant laminin associated with Schwann cells [11]; LN-5 (α3,β3,γ2 chains) is found in oral, intestinal and dermal epithelial cells [13, 25, 26]; LN-10/11 is expressed in the lung epithelium [27]. The interaction between ECM laminins and integrins of epithelial cells confers mechanical stability to tissues as well as an invasive mechanism for pathogens [23].
It has been reported that M. leprae binds to the globular domains (LG1, LG4, and LG5 domains) of LN-α2 chain and that the LN-α2 chain simultaneously binds to α-DG, a surface receptor, of Schwann cells, resulting in the attachment and invasion of M. leprae to Schwann cells [12]. Our results also show that coating M. leprae with LN-α2 enhanced the binding of M. leprae to HEKn cells (Fig 5A) and a pre-treatment with an antibody against α-DG inhibited the binding of LN-α2-coated M. leprae to HEKn cells (Fig 6A). However, although LN-α2 (α2,β1,γ1 chains) mediates the attachment of M. leprae to HEKn cells, it was not detected in the skin (Fig 2), whereas LN-5 (α3,β3,γ2 chains) is a major form of laminins that is present between the epidermis and dermis [13]. Thus, in the current study, we focused on the role of LN-5 in the interaction of M. leprae with keratinocytes.
It has been reported that LN-5, which is expressed in the BM between the epidermis and dermis, has been reported to be a target molecule and mediator for the invasion of the Human papilloma virus (HPV) to keratinocytes [20]. HPV first infects keratinocytes in the basal layer of the epidermis and then replicates in a fully differentiating squamous epithelium [28]. Culp et al. [20] reported that the HPV capsid binds to LN-5 in the ECM of cultured keratinocytes. In that report, the authors reported that, when sections of cervical mucosa tissues were incubated with HPV, the HPV became bound to the suprabasal layer and BM of the cervical mucosa and that a pre-treatment with anti-LN-5 antibody blocked the binding of HPV to these cervical mucosa tissue sections. Our results also show that M. leprae preferentially bound to LN-5-coated slides, compared to collagen IV and fibronectin (Fig 4) and that coating M. leprae with LN-5 enhanced the binding of M. leprae to HEKn cells (Fig 5B), suggesting LN-5 mediates the attachment of M. leprae to HEKn cells. Although M.leprae can be detected in the all layers of the skin, it is more frequently detected in the suprabasal and basal layers of the epidermis of patients with multibacillary leprosy [3, 29]. We conclude that the clinical findings support the conclusion that LN-5 in the BM of the epidermis mediates the attachment and invasion of M.leprae to non-differentiated, proliferating keratinocytes in the basal layer.
It is well known that α-DG serves as a Schwann cell receptor for the LN-α2-mediated M.leprae invasion of Schwann cells [7]. In the skin, α/β-DG is present in the epidermal BM [30]. Thus, we hypothesized that α-DG is also involved in the LN-5-mediated M.leprae interaction with keratinocytes, as shown in the LN-2α-mediated M.leprae invasion of Schwann cells. As shown in Fig 6B and 6C, our results show that pre-treatment with an anti-α-DG antibody blocked the binding of LN-5-coated M.leprae to HEKn cells. LN-5 permits the stable attachment of the epidermis to the dermis via interaction with α/β-DG as well as integrins of keratinocytes [13–15, 30]. In addition, the interaction of LN-5 with integrin α3β1 and α6β4 activates the adhesion and spreading of keratinocytes for wound healing [14, 15]. These previous results indicate that LN-5/α3β1 or α6β4 may be involved in mediating the attachment of M.leprae to HEKn cells and their subsequent invasion. Consistent with these results, the findings reported herein show that a pre-treatment with anti-integrin β1 or β4 antibody blocked the binding of LN-5-coated M.leprae to HEKn cells (Fig 6B and 6C).
Although M.leprae is not frequently detected in the epidermis, studies have clearly shown that M.leprae is found in the epidermis of patients with multibacillary leprosy [3, 4, 29, 31–33]. M.leprae was detected in all layers of the epidermis, basal, suprabasal, prickle cells, and keratin layers [3, 4]. In addition, M.leprae was also reported to be distributed in sweat glands and hair follicles [3]. Job et al. [4] suggested that the transepidermal discharge of M.leprae may be attributed to the possibility that M.leprae is transferred to the keratin layer by travelling inside keratinocytes from the basal to the keratin layer and that M.leprae then exits from hair follicles or sebaceous glands. Satapathy et al. [29] also reported that a 49-year-old man with lepromatous leprosy after dapsone monotherapy for 12 years had a recurrence of leprosy and that his skin biopsies showed bacillary clumps in epidermis. In that report, the authors suggested that health workers in leprosy control should consider the possibility that leprosy can be transmitted through the skin and by skin to skin contact, since large numbers of M.leprae are shed, even through intact skin.
The findings reported in this study suggest that M. leprae binds to non-differentiated, proliferating HEKn cells by taking advantage of the interaction of LN-5 in the basal lamina of the epidermis and a surface receptor on keratinocytes, such as α-DG, integrin-β1, or -β4. However, although our results show the possibility that the epidermis is a route for M.leprae transmission, the transmission of M.leprae through the skin has not yet been experimentally proved. The mechanism responsible for the transmission remains unknown.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Kenji Kohsaka, Sasakawa Research Center, Soi Bamrasnaradoon Hospital, Thailand, for donating M.leprae. We thank Park Jieun, Integrative Research Support Center, The Catholic University of Korea, for the immunofluorescence analysis.
References
- 1. Britton WJ, Lockwood DN. Leprosy. Lancet (London, England), 2004 Apr 10;363(9416):1209–19. pmid:15081655.
- 2.
Charles K. Pathology of Leprosy. Hastings RC, Opromolla DVA, Leprosy, 2nd edition, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1994:193–224.
- 3. Hosokawa A. A clinical and bacteriological examination of Mycobacterium leprae in the epidermis and cutaneous appendages of patients with multibacillary leprosy. The Journal of dermatology, 1999 Aug;26(8):479–88. pmid:10487001.
- 4. Job CK, Jayakumar J, Aschhoff M. "Large numbers" of Mycobacterium leprae are discharged from the intact skin of lepromatous patients; a preliminary report. International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases:official organ of the International Leprosy Association, 1999 Jun;67(2):164–7. pmid:10472371.
- 5. Namisato M, Kakuta M, Kawatsu K, Obara A, Izumi S, Ogawa H. Transepidermal elimination of lepromatous granuloma: a mechanism for mass transport of viable bacilli. Leprosy review, 1997 Jun;68(2):167–72. pmid:9217357.
- 6. Lyrio EC, Campos-Souza IC, Correa LC, Lechuga GC, Vericimo M, Castro HC, et al. Interaction of Mycobacterium leprae with the HaCaT human keratinocyte cell line: new frontiers in the cellular immunology of leprosy. Experimental dermatology, 2015 Jul;24(7):536–42. pmid:25828729.
- 7. Rambukkana A, Yamada H, Zanazzi G, Mathus T, Salzer JL, Yurchenco PD, et al. Role of alpha-dystroglycan as a Schwann cell receptor for Mycobacterium leprae. Science (New York, NY), 1998 Dec 11;282(5396):2076–9. pmid:9851927.
- 8. Yamada H, Denzer AJ, Hori H, Tanaka T, Anderson LV, Fujita S, et al. Dystroglycan is a dual receptor for agrin and laminin-2 in Schwann cell membrane. The Journal of biological chemistry, 1996 Sep 20;271(38):23418–23. pmid:8798547.
- 9. Ervasti JM, Campbell KP. Membrane organization of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex. Cell, 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1121–31. pmid:1913804.
- 10. Chernousov MA, Carey DJ. Schwann cell extracellular matrix molecules and their receptors. Histology and histopathology, 2000 Apr;15(2):593–601. pmid:10809381.
- 11. Wallquist W, Patarroyo M, Thams S, Carlstedt T, Stark B, Cullheim S, et al. Laminin chains in rat and human peripheral nerve: distribution and regulation during development and after axonal injury. The Journal of comparative neurology, 2002 Dec 16;454(3):284–93. pmid:12442319.
- 12. Rambukkana A. Molecular basis for the peripheral nerve predilection of Mycobacterium leprae. Current opinion in microbiology, 2001 Feb;4(1):21–7. pmid:11173029.
- 13. Nishiyama T, Amano S, Tsunenaga M, Kadoya K, Takeda A, Adachi E, et al. The importance of laminin 5 in the dermal-epidermal basement membrane. Journal of dermatological science, 2000 Dec;24 Suppl 1:S51–9. pmid:11137397.
- 14. Nguyen BP, Ren XD, Schwartz MA, Carter WG. Ligation of integrin alpha 3beta 1 by laminin 5 at the wound edge activates Rho-dependent adhesion of leading keratinocytes on collagen. The Journal of biological chemistry, 2001 Nov 23;276(47):43860–70. pmid:11571278.
- 15. Nguyen BP, Gil SG, Carter WG. Deposition of laminin 5 by keratinocytes regulates integrin adhesion and signaling. The Journal of biological chemistry, 2000 Oct 13;275(41):31896–907. pmid:10926936.
- 16. Durbeej M, Henry MD, Ferletta M, Campbell KP, Ekblom P. Distribution of dystroglycan in normal adult mouse tissues. The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry:official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 1998 Apr;46(4):449–57. pmid:9524190.
- 17. Levy L, Ji B. The mouse foot-pad technique for cultivation of Mycobacterium leprae. Leprosy review, 2006 Mar;77(1):5–24. pmid:16715686.
- 18. Shepard CC, McRae DH. A method for counting acid-fast bacteria. International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases:official organ of the International Leprosy Association, 1968 Jan-Mar;36(1):78–82. pmid:4869698.
- 19. Zambaiti E, Scottoni F, Rizzi E, Russo S, Deguchi K, Eaton S, et al. Whole rat stomach decellularisation using a detergent-enzymatic protocol. Pediatric surgery international, 2019 Jan;35(1):21–7. pmid:30443739; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6326006.
- 20. Culp TD, Budgeon LR, Marinkovich MP, Meneguzzi G, Christensen ND. Keratinocyte-secreted laminin 5 can function as a transient receptor for human papillomaviruses by binding virions and transferring them to adjacent cells. Journal of virology, 2006 Sep;80(18):8940–50. pmid:16940506; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1563898.
- 21. Rambukkana A, Salzer JL, Yurchenco PD, Tuomanen EI. Neural targeting of Mycobacterium leprae mediated by the G domain of the laminin-alpha2 chain. Cell, 1997 Mar 21;88(6):811–21. pmid:9118224.
- 22. Hynes RO. The extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils. Science (New York, NY), 2009 326(5957):1216–9.
- 23. Singh B, Fleury C, Jalalvand F, Riesbeck K. Human pathogens utilize host extracellular matrix proteins laminin and collagen for adhesion and invasion of the host. FEMS microbiology reviews, 2012 Nov;36(6):1122–80. pmid:22537156.
- 24. Aumailley M, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Carter WG, Deutzmann R, Edgar D, Ekblom P, et al. A simplified laminin nomenclature. Matrix biology:journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology, 2005 Aug;24(5):326–32. pmid:15979864.
- 25. Lotz MM, Nusrat A, Madara JL, Ezzell R, Wewer UM, Mercurio AM. Intestinal epithelial restitution. Involvement of specific laminin isoforms and integrin laminin receptors in wound closure of a transformed model epithelium. The American journal of pathology, 1997 Feb;150(2):747–60. pmid:9033287; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1858283.
- 26. Thorup AK, Dabelsteen E, Schou S, Gil SG, Carter WG, Reibel J. Differential expression of integrins and laminin-5 in normal oral epithelia. APMIS:acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 1997 Jul;105(7):519–30. pmid:9269298.
- 27. Kikkawa Y, Sanzen N, Sekiguchi K. Isolation and characterization of laminin-10/11 secreted by human lung carcinoma cells. laminin-10/11 mediates cell adhesion through integrin alpha3 beta1. The Journal of biological chemistry, 1998 Jun 19;273(25):15854–9. pmid:9624186.
- 28. Stanley MA. Epithelial cell responses to infection with human papillomavirus. Clinical microbiology reviews, 2012 Apr;25(2):215–22. pmid:22491770; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3346303.
- 29. Satapathy J, Kar BR, Job CK. Presence of Mycobacterium leprae in epidermal cells of lepromatous skin and its significance. Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology, 2005 Jul-Aug;71(4):267–9. pmid:16394437.
- 30. Herzog C, Has C, Franzke CW, Echtermeyer FG, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Kroger S, et al. Dystroglycan in skin and cutaneous cells: beta-subunit is shed from the cell surface. The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2004 Jun;122(6):1372–80. pmid:15175026.
- 31. Seo VH, Cho W, Choi HY, Hah YM, Cho SN. Mycobacterium leprae in the epidermis: ultrastructural study I. International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases:official organ of the International Leprosy Association, 1995 Mar;63(1):101–4. pmid:7730705.
- 32. Okada S, Komura J, Nishiura M. Mycobacterium leprae found in epidermal cells by electron microscopy. International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases:official organ of the International Leprosy Association, 1978 Jan-Mar;46(1):30–4. pmid:348610.
- 33. Harada K. A modified allochrome procedure for demonstrating mycobacteria in tissue sections. International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases:official organ of the International Leprosy Association, 1977 Jan-Mar;45(1):49–51. 68940.