http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8984-8723
Figures
Abstract
Background
Anopheles balabacensis of the Leucospyrus group has been confirmed as the primary knowlesi malaria vector in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo for some time now. Presently, knowlesi malaria is the only zoonotic simian malaria in Malaysia with a high prevalence recorded in the states of Sabah and Sarawak.
Methodology/Principal findings
Anopheles spp. were sampled using human landing catch (HLC) method at Paradason village in Kudat district of Sabah. The collected Anopheles were identified morphologically and then subjected to total DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect Plasmodium parasites in the mosquitoes. Identification of Plasmodium spp. was confirmed by sequencing the SSU rRNA gene with species specific primers. MEGA4 software was then used to analyse the SSU rRNA sequences and bulid the phylogenetic tree for inferring the relationship between simian malaria parasites in Sabah.
PCR results showed that only 1.61% (23/1,425) of the screened An. balabacensis were infected with one or two of the five simian Plasmodium spp. found in Sabah, viz. Plasmodium coatneyi, P. inui, P. fieldi, P. cynomolgi and P. knowlesi. Sequence analysis of SSU rRNA of Plasmodium isolates showed high percentage of identity within the same Plasmodium sp. group. The phylogenetic tree based on the consensus sequences of P. knowlesi showed 99.7%–100.0% nucleotide identity among the isolates from An. balabacensis, human patients and a long-tailed macaque from the same locality.
Conclusions/Significance
This is the first study showing high molecular identity between the P. knowlesi isolates from An. balabacensis, human patients and a long-tailed macaque in Sabah. The other common simian Plasmodium spp. found in long-tailed macaques and also detected in An. balabacensis were P. coatneyi, P. inui, P. fieldi and P. cynomolgi. The high percentage identity of nucleotide sequences between the P. knowlesi isolates from the long-tailed macaque, An. balabacensis and human patients suggests a close genetic relationship between the parasites from these hosts.
Author summary
Anopheles balabacensis has been incriminated as the primary vector of zoonotic simian malaria, P. knowlesi in Malaysian Borneo with a high prevalence recorded in the states of Sabah and Sarawak. In this study, Anopheles spp. were sampled using human landing catch (HLC) method at Paradason village in Kudat district of Sabah. Total DNA was extracted from these specimens, followed by sequencing the SSU rRNA gene of Plasmodium using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection and identification of Plasmodium. PCR results showed that only 1.61% (23/1,425) of the screened An. balabacensis had either single or double Plasmodium spp infections. The simian malaria parasites isolated from An. balabacensis were P. coatneyi, P. inui, P. fieldi, P. cynomologi and P. knowlesi. Sequence analysis of these Plasmodium isolates showed high percentage of identity within the same Plasmodium sp. group. Consensus sequences phylogenetic tree of P. knowlesi isolates from An. balabacensis, human patients and a long-tailed macaque from the same locality had 99.7%–100.0% nucleotide identity. This study suggests a close genetic relationship between the parasites isolated from these hosts.
Citation: Chua TH, Manin BO, Daim S, Vythilingam I, Drakeley C (2017) Phylogenetic analysis of simian Plasmodium spp. infecting Anopheles balabacensis Baisas in Sabah, Malaysia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(10): e0005991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005991
Editor: Hans-Peter Fuehrer, Vienna, AUSTRIA
Received: June 30, 2017; Accepted: September 24, 2017; Published: October 2, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Chua et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was supported by: Medical Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biosciences Research Council for the funding received for this project through the Environmental & Social Ecology of Human Infectious Diseases Initiative (ESEI), MRC Grant Number: G1100796. BOM would also like to thank the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education for providing a scholarship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Anopheles species of the Leucosphyrus group have been identified as medically important vectors in Southeast Asia region [1,2]. The Leucosphyrus group has three main subgroups; Hackeri, Leucosphyrus and Riparis subgroups [3], with the Leucosphyrus subgroup further divided into Dirus complex and Leucosphyrus complex [2,4]. In Peninsular Malaysia, three species of the Leucosphyrus group namely An. hackeri, An. cracens and An. introlatus had been incriminated as primary vectors for P. knowlesi [5–7]. However, in East Malaysia, An. latens in Sarawak and An. balabacensis in Sabah had been confirmed as primary vectors for P. knowlesi [8,9].
A study in Cambodia in 1962 has shown that An. balabacensis (identified as An. dirus later [10]) preferred biting human compared to monkeys placed at the ground level, but preferred monkeys at canopy level to monkeys on the ground [11]. A study in Sabah comparing human landing catch (HLC) and monkey baited trap (MBT) at ground level showed that more An. balabacensis were caught using HLC than MBT [12]. Recent studies showed that this species is more active during the early night with a peak biting time between 7 pm to 8 pm [9,13], and also prefers to bite outdoors than indoors [13]. Such biting behaviors coupled with an abundant source of simian malaria parasites in the reservoir long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) contribute to An. balabacensis becoming an effective vector for transmitting P. knowlesi malaria in Sabah.
Previous studies in Malaysia have shown that the long-tailed macaques harbor at least five species of simian Plasmodium [14,15], all of which have also been detected in An. balabacensis [9,16]. In Sabah, besides P. knowlesi, other simian malaria parasites recorded in An. balabacensis are P. coatneyi, P. inui, P. fieldi and P. cynomolgi [9,13]. Apart from recording these parasites in the mosquitoes, there is limited study on the phylogenetic relationship among these simian malaria parasites found in An. balabacensis, macaques and human.
In this study, we compare the partial nucleotide sequences of SSU rRNA of simian malaria parasites isolated from An. balabacensis caught in Kudat district of Sabah, from macaques as well as human patients with other published sequences of human and simian malaria parasites available in the GeneBank database. Building a phylogenetic tree of these malaria parasites will give us a clearer picture about their genetic relationship especially for P. knowlesi isolated from long-tailed macaque, An. balabacensis and human.
Materials and methods
Study area
Kudat district, located at the northern tip of Borneo under the Kudat Division, is about 153 kilometers from Kota Kinabalu, the state capital of Sabah. Paradason village where the study was conducted is located in Kudat District and about 50 kilometers from Kudat town (Fig 1). Most of the villagers belong to the Rungus ethnic group who are dependent on small-scale farming (paddy), oil palm and rubber plantations as their primary source of income.
Sampling of Anopheles
Anopheles mosquitoes were sampled monthly from October, 2013 to December, 2014 using human landing catch (HLC) method. A total 70 nights of sampling were performed starting from 1800 to 0600 hours (12 hours). Two pairs of volunteers were assigned working in shifts at a randomly selected habitat during each night of sampling. Anopheles was lured by the volunteers exposing their legs. The mosquitoes landing on the legs were caught by the volunteers using plastic specimen tubes (2 cm diameter X 6 cm) aided by a flashlight.
Morphological identification of Anopheles species
The next morning, the Anopheles mosquitoes were killed by keeping them in the freezer (-20°C) for a few minutes, then gently pinned onto Nu poly strip using ultra-thin micro-headless pins. Species identification was done under a compound microscope using published keys [2,17,18]. After identification, each individual specimen was stored separately in a new microfuge tube and transported to Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah for further processing.
Total DNA extraction of Anopheles
Each individual Anopheles specimen was placed separately inside a sterilized mortar and the tissue homogenized using a sterile pestle. The total DNA was extracted from the tissues using DTAB-CTAB method [19] with some modifications (for example: incubation time was reduce to 30 minute instead of overnight and at the final step of precipitation before adding TE buffer, DNA pellet was incubated at 45°C to completely evaporate any residue of ethanol).
First, 600 μl of DTAB solution was added into the mortar and the tissue was ground using pestle until homogenized. Then, the homogenized tissue was transferred into a clean 1.5 ml microfuge tube and incubated at 68°C for 30 min. Subsequently, 600 μl of chloroform was added into the microfuge tube which was inverted ten times to mix the contents and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min. Then, 400 μl of the upper aqueous layer was carefully transferred into a new clean 1.5 ml microfuge tube and mixed with 900 μl sterile dH2O and 100 μl CTAB solution by gently inverting the microfuge tube for several times and allowed it to sit at room temperature for 5 min. The mixture was then spun at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and the DNA pellet was re-suspended in 300 μl of 1.2 M NaCl solution. Total DNA was precipitated by adding 750 μl of absolute ethanol and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, the DNA pellet washed with 500 μl of 70% ethanol and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 2 min. The DNA pellet was incubated at 45°C for 10 min and re-suspended in 30 μl Tris-EDTA (pH8.0) buffer and stored at -30°C.
Amplification of Plasmodium DNA
Presence of malaria parasites in the mosquitoes was detected using nested PCR by targeting the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene of Plasmodium. A PCR primer pair, rPLU1 and rPLU5, was used in first PCR reaction, while another pair (rPLU3 and rPLU4) was used in the second PCR reaction [20]. For internal control, another set of nested PCR was performed separately to amplify the cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COII) gene of Anopheles [12]. When a mosquito was confirmed positive for malaria parasites, the Plasmodium species was determined using species specific primers. Both PCR reactions were performed with 25.0 μl final volume.
The reaction components were prepared by mixing 5.0 μl of 5X PCR buffer (Promega), 0.5 μl of (10 mM) dNTPs (Promega), 3.0 μl of (25 mM) MgCl2, 1.0 μl of (10 μM) forward and reverse primers, 0.3 μl of (5.0 U/μl) Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), 2.0 μl of DNA template and sterile dH2O to make up to 25.0 μl final volume. After completion of the first PCR, 2.0 μl of the PCR product was used as DNA template in the second PCR. The reaction was carried out using a thermal cycler (T100 Thermal Cycler, BioRad) with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 1 min and one final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. The annealing temperature was set at optimal temperature for each set of primers (see S1 Table). The PCR products were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with RedSafe nucleic acid staining solution (iNtRON Biotechnology), and visualized with an UV transilluminator.
Cloning and sequencing of SSU rRNA gene of simian Plasmodium
The SSU rRNA gene of the five simian malaria parasite species extracted from An. balabacensis caught in Paradason were cloned and sequenced. In addition, we included in the study blood samples from two P. knowlesi patients and two long tail macaques, one infected with P. knowlesi while the other with P. inui. To make the data set larger, we included simian malaria parasites obtained from mosquitoes caught in three other villages (Tomohon, Mambatu Laut and Narandang) in Kudat district from another study.
A new universal forward primer (UMSF) combined with species-specific primers were used to amplify the SSU rRNA gene of Plasmodium. Details of the primers are provided in S2 Table. Preparation of the reaction mixture and the PCR conditions programmed are as described above. After the PCR was completed, the PCR products were purified to remove impurity and excess reaction mixture using MEGA quick-spin PCR & Agarose Gel DNA Extraction System (iNtRON Biotechnology, Korea) according to manufacturer’s procedure.
Cloning the SSU rRNA gene was done using pGEM-TEasy vectors (Promega, USA) and the plasmids were extracted from the transformed E. coli (JM109) using DNA-spin Plasmid DNA Purification Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Korea), all according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The extracted plasmid vectors were restricted using EcoRI restriction enzyme (Promega, USA) and sent to AITBIOTECH, Singapore for sequencing. Sequencing was carried in both directions using forward and reverse M13 primers.
BLAST search of SSU rRNA sequence
The nucleotide sequences of SSU rRNA of 21 Plasmodium isolates in this study were aligned and compared with other SSU rRNA sequences available at the GeneBank database to determine the percentage identity using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) available online at https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.
Sequence analysis and phylogenetic tree of SSU rRNA
The SSU rRNA sequences were standardized to a fixed region for analysis based on the UMSF and UNR primers binding sites. Further analysis was performed using MEGA software, version 4.1 [21]. The nucleotide sequences were multi-aligned using ClustalW method [22] incorporated in the software and the number of variable nucleotides within each of the five Plasmodium spp. determined.
Phylogenetic tree was constructed using neighbor-joining method [23] and the evolutionary distances computed using maximum composite likelihood model with a bootstrap test of 1000 replicates [24] and pairwise deletion option. This method was adopted as it takes into account the different rates of evolution or substitution between nucleotides. The selected region for constructing the phylogenetic tree was nucleotides numbered nt81 to nt1041, based on the published P. knowlesi sequence (AY327551) isolated in Kapit Sarawak where there was a large focus of infected people [25]. This region includes the binding sites for universal forward (UMSF, used in this study) and reverse primers (UNR, [26]) of SSU rRNA. In constructing the phylogenetic tree, Theileria spp. (AF162432) was used as the outgroup. Details of the other 66 nucleotide sequences that were used in constructing the phylogenetic tree are given in S3 Table. Both Plasmodium simium (AY579415) and P. brasilianum (AF130735, KT266778) were not included in the sequence analysis as the selected sequence used in this study was not available in GeneBank database.
A second phylogenetic tree was constructed using the consensus sequences of five Plasmodium species found in Sabah to show the relationship between Plasmodium isolates found in the macaque, An. balabacensis and human.
Ethical clearance
This project was approved by the National Medical Ethics Committee (NMRR), Ministry of Health Malaysia (Ref. NMRR-12-786-13048). All volunteers who carried out mosquito collections signed informed consent forms and were provided with antimalarial prophylaxis during the study period. Blood spots on Whatman filter paper were collected from adult patients by Kudat hospital personnel, after they had signed informed consent forms. This human blood sample collection was also approved by the NMRR (Ref. NMRR–11–4539471). Blood spots on filter paper were collected by wild life department personel from ten wild macaques captured for relocation purposes and kept in cages following the guidelines in the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Used in Scientific Procedures (UK), with the approval from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWER, Ref.2012/8N). Fecal samples were not used then as the protocol for storing the samples had not yet been established by primatology group of the research team.
Results
Abundance of Anopheles species
A total of 1,599 Anopheles individuals belonging to ten species were caught during 14 months of sampling (Table 1). Anopheles balabacensis was the dominant species in Paradason village comprising 89.87% of the total catch, followed by An. barbumbrosus (5.75%), An. maculatus (1.38%) and An. donaldi (1.19%).
Infection of Anopheles specimens with malaria parasites
A total of 1,586 Anopheles mosquitoes (of which 1,425 were An. balabacensis) were tested for presence of malaria parasites using the PCR method. Only 23 An. balabacensis (1.61%) were found to have malaria parasites in them, being infected with one (78.3%) or two simian Plasmodium spp. (Table 2). The single infection was mostly by P. inui (n = 11).
BLAST search of SSU rRNA sequences of Plasmodium spp.
BLAST analysis of 21 SSU rRNA sequences of Plasmodium spp. isolated from An. balabacensis, human and long tail macaques (3 samples of P. coatneyi, 1027–1029 bp; 4 samples of P. cynomolgi, 1015 bp; 3 of P. fieldi, 1039 bp; 6 of P. inui, 1039 bp and 5 of P. knowlesi, 1050 bp) showed high percentage of identity with the simian Plasmodium nucleotide sequences published in the GeneBank database.
The Plasmodium species in Sabah show a high percentage identity within the same species groups (98.4%–99.6%) but less between different species groups. The highest percentage identity (99.6%) was observed between the P. cynomolgi samples isolated from Tomohon, Membatu Laut and Paradason villages, while the least was for P. coatneyi isolates (98.4%) obtained from Narandang and Paradason villages.
The SSU rRNA sequences of Plasmodium spp. from Sabah also show high percentage identity with the same species from other Asian regions. Plasmodium coatneyi sequences showed 99% identity with P. coatneyi isolated from M. fascicularis in Kapit, Sarawak (FJ619094), as well as with CDC (AB265790) and Hackeri (CP016248) strains. Plasmodium cynomolgi sequences showed 99%–100% identity with P. cynomolgi isolated from M. fascicularis in Kapit, Sarawak (FJ619084), and from other macaque species viz. M. radiata (AB287290) of southern India and M. nemestrina (AB287289) from unspecified South-east Asian nation. Similarly, P. fieldi has high percentage identity with P. fieldi isolated from M. fascicularis in Kapit, Sarawak (KC662444). Of interest is P. inui, which not only has high identity (99%–100%) with those isolated in Kapit (FJ619074) but also with P. inui isolated from M. fascicularis from South China (HM032051), Southern Thailand (EU400388) and strain Taiwan II isolate from M. cyclopis (FN430725).
The P. knowlesi samples of Sabah showed 99% identity with P. knowlesi isolated from both human (AY327551) and M. fascicularis (FJ619089) in Kapit, Sarawak, as well as with that from a Swedish traveler who was infected during his visit to Sarawak (EU807923) [27].
Sequence analysis and phylogenetic trees
The number of nucleotides in the analyzed region for the various Plasmodium spp. are: P. knowlesi 961 bp, P. inui 946, P. coatneyi 942, P. cynomolgi 935 and P. fieldi 934 respectively. Sequence alignment indicated that P. coatneyi has the highest number of variable nucleotides among the isolates (n = 3 isolates; 15 variable nucleotides) followed by P. knowlesi (n = 5; 9), P. inui (n = 6; 7), P. fieldi (n = 3; 5) and P. cynomolgi (n = 4; 4).
Further analysis of the P. knowlesi group using consensus sequences showed that there were three variable nucleotides between P. knowlesi isolated from the long-tailed macaque and human, two between long-tailed macaque and An. balabacensis isolates but none between An. balabacensis and human isolates (Fig 2).
The three variable nucleotides in the consensus sequences between the P. knowlesi isolates are shown within the red rectangles.
In the phylogenetic tree generated for 13 Plasmodium species infecting monkeys and humans (Fig 3), all the 21 Plasmodium isolates obtained in the study were placed in the correct species group. P. knowlesi group was positioned below P. coatneyi group whereas P. inui, P. fieldi and P. cynomolgi were placed at the upper branches.
The bar below the tree represents distance scale. The evolutionary distances were computed using the maximum composite likelihood method and all positions containing alignment gaps and missing data were eliminated only in the pairwise sequence comparisons. The tree was replicated with 1000 bootstraps and only values>50% are showed in the tree. The tree was out grouped with Theileria spp. (AF162432).
In the phylogenetic tree depicting relationship between the five Plasmodium species found in Sabah using consensus sequences, a similar tree topology was also observed (Fig 4). All Plasmodium group except for P. knowlesi group has two branches, each representing the host from which Plasmodium was isolated. However, P. knowlesi group has three branches with the isolates from both An. balabacensis and macaque closer to each other than to the isolates from humans.
The evolutionary distances were computed using the maximum composite likelihood method and all positions containing alignment gaps were eliminated only in the pairwise sequence comparisons. The tree was out grouped with Theileria spp.
Discussion
In this study, we analyzed 21 nucleotide sequences of partial SSU rRNA of five Plasmodium spp. isolated from An. balabacensis collected in Kudat district of Sabah, infected humans and a long-tailed macaque together with other nucleotide sequences downloaded from the GeneBank database. The results suggest that in Sabah, there is a close genetic relationship between the P. knowlesi specimens in the long-tailed macaques, An. balabacensis and human.
Plasmodium inui appears to be a common simian malaria parasite found in 61% (14/23) of the infected An. balabacensis specimens. This was also the case in other investigations [9,28]. Hitherto, this simian malaria has not become zoonotic to humans yet although it has been proven experimentally to be infective to monkey through the bites of An. dirus [29]. The infection rate of P. knowlesi in An. balabacensis is low (0.14%, 2/1,425) with only two mosquitoes being infected along with other Plasmodium species. Nevertheless P. knowlesi is the dominant Plasmodium species recorded among the human cases in Sabah [30]. These cases were recorded mainly in the rural areas near to forests and also among the workers in the agricultural sector viz. in oil palm estates and vegetable farms [13,31].
Sequence data of the SSU rRNA of Plasmodium confirm that the five species of simian Plasmodium commonly harbored by the wild macaques in Malaysia are also found in An. balabacensis. BLAST results of Sabah’s Plasmodium sequences showed high identity with other simian Plasmodium sequences published in the GeneBank database, especially with the simian malaria parasites in long-tailed macaques in Kapit, Sarawak (FJ619069 and FJ619089). This could suggest that a similar or closely related cluster of simian Plasmodium is circulating among the monkey populations and Anopheles mosquitoes in both Sabah and Sarawak. This is highly plausible as these two states share a common boundary, and there is a continual movement of humans between these two states.
The total number of nucleotides in the analyzed region was different for the five simian Plasmodium spp. in Sabah, with P. knowlesi having a higher number. The differences in total number of nucleotides in the SSU rRNA gene confer a unique signature to each Plasmodium species. Furthermore the presence of conserved and variable sequences in the gene makes it suitable for species identification and phylogenetic study [32,33].
The percentage of identity between consensus sequences of SSU rRNA of P. knowlesi isolates from the monkey, mosquito and man was high (Fig 2). For example, 100% identity was observed between P. knowlesi isolates from An. balabacensis and human, 99.8% between An. balabacensis and the long-tailed macaque, and 99.7% between long-tailed macaque and human. This indicates a great genetic similarity in P. knowlesi found in the long-tailed macaque, An. balabacensis and human populations. However, it is not certain if this would indicate the same cluster of P. knowlesi is circulating between these hosts, since we did not dissect the mosquitoes’ salivary glands to detect for sporozoites, or carry out RT-PCR targeting the specific mRNA transcripts of the sporozoite stage. Thus further study is needed to determine this, using more P. knowlesi positive Anopheles balabacensis and analyzing other polymorphic markers or microsatellite loci of the parasite. Different P. knowlesi haplotypes have been observed in the macaque and human populations in Kapit Sarawak [14] as well as in the human population in Thailand [34].
Overall, the 13 Plasmodium species in the phylogenetic tree can be grouped into two main clusters, one containing the P. vivax/simian malaria parasites while the other human malaria parasites (Fig 3). Although P. simium (AY579415) and P. brasilianum (AF130735, KT266778) were not included in our analysis as their nucleotide sequences in the GeneBank database do not contain the same analyzed region, P. simium is closely related to P. vivax [32]and can be placed in the first cluster, while P. brasilianum is closely related to P. malariae and can be placed in the second cluster. It may be noted that P. cynomolgi, P. fieldi and P. simiovale were not clearly resolved as some of the isolates were grouped in different branches. This could be due to the high percentage of nucleotide identity (99.6%) among these three species.
The consensus tree (Fig 4) of Plasmodium species found in Sabah showed a very close relationship between the Plasmodium isolates from monkey as the reservoir, An. balabacensis as the vector, and human as the case. This is supported by P. knowlesi isolates from these three organisms having high nucleotide identity (99.7–100%).
Currently in Sabah, An. balabacensis is the only species found to carry P. knowlesi. The phylogenetic analysis here indicates that the vector picks up the malaria parasites from monkeys and transmits them to humans when it feeds on them. However, there is a lot more about the transmission dynamics of P. knowlesi that is still unknown and needs to be unpacked. A clearer picture on the interrelationship of simian malaria parasites found in An. balabacensis will help us to understand more about Plasmodium itself. Future research may focus more on the host-vector relationship that requires longer nucleotide sequence analysis so that new informed alternatives for malaria elimination strategy targeting on P. knowlesi as well as other simian malaria parasites may be formulated.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Details of PCR primers used in PCR reactions for detection of Plasmodium parasites in Anopheles specimens.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005991.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Forward and reverse PCR primers used to amplify partial region SSU rRNA of five Plasmodium species extracted from An. balabacensis. The amplified region was cloned and sequenced for further analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005991.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Information on nucleotide sequences of SSU rRNA gene downloaded from GeneBank database used in building phylogenetic tree.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005991.s003
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Universiti Malaysia Sabah for all the research facilities provided, Mr. Fazreen and Mr. Nemran for helping in the field work and MONKEYBAR team for their logistics support. We also like to acknowledge community of Paradason for their cooperation and warm hospitality during this study.
References
- 1. Warren M, Wharton RH (1963) The vectors of simian malaria: identity, biology, and geographical distribution. J Parasitol 49: 892–904. pmid:14084193
- 2. Sallum MAM, Peyton EL, Harrison BA, Wilkerson RC (2005) Revision of the Leucosphyrus group of Anopheles (Cellia) (Diptera, Culicidae) Rev Bras entomol 49: 1–152.
- 3.
Reid JA (1968) Anopheline mosquitoes of Malaya and Borneo. Staples Printers Limited at their Kettering, Northants: Government of Malaysia. 520 p.
- 4. Sallum MA, Peyton EL, Wilkerson RC (2005) Six new species of the Anopheles leucosphyrus group, reinterpretation of An. elegans and vector implications. Med Vet Entomol 19: 158–199. pmid:15958025
- 5. Wharton RH, Eyles DE (1961) Anopheles hackeri, a vector of Plasmodium knowlesi in Malaya. Science 134: 279–280. pmid:13784726
- 6. Vythilingam I, NoorAzian YM, Huat TC, Jiram AI, Yusri YM, Azahari AH et al. (2008) Plasmodium knowlesi in humans, macaques and mosquitoes in peninsular Malaysia. Parasit Vectors 1: 26. pmid:18710577
- 7. Vythilingam I, Lim YA, Venugopalan B, Ngui R, Leong CS, Wong ML et al. (2014) Plasmodium knowlesi malaria an emerging public health problem in Hulu Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia (2009–2013): epidemiologic and entomologic analysis. Parasit Vectors 7: 436. pmid:25223878
- 8. Vythilingam I, Tan CH, Asmad M, Chan ST, Lee KS, Singh B (2006) Natural transmission of Plasmodium knowlesi to humans by Anopheles latens in Sarawak, Malaysia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 100: 1087–1088. pmid:16725166
- 9. Wong ML, Chua TH, Leong CS, Khaw LT, Fornace K, Wan-Sulaiman WY et al. (2015) Seasonal and spatial dynamics of the primary vector of Plasmodium knowlesi within a major transmission focus in Sabah, Malaysia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9: e0004135. pmid:26448052
- 10. Obsomer V, Defourny P, Coosemans M (2007) The Anopheles dirus complex: spatial distribution and environmental drivers. Malaria Journal 6: 26. pmid:17341297
- 11. Eyles DE, Wharton RH, Cheong WH, Warren M (1964) Studies on malaria and Anopheles balabacensis in Cambodia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 30: 7–21. pmid:14122444
- 12. Hawkes F, Manin BO, Ng SH, Torr SJ, Drakeley C, Chua TH et al. (2017) Evaluation of electric nets as means to sample mosquito vectors host-seeking on humans and primates. Parasit Vectors 10: 338. pmid:28720113
- 13. Manin BO, Ferguson HM, Vythilingam I, Fornace K, William T, Torr SJ et al. (2016) Investigating the contribution of peri-domestic transmission to risk of zoonotic malaria infection in humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10: e0005064. pmid:27741235
- 14. Lee KS, Divis PCS, Zakaria SK, Matusop A, Julin RA, Conway DJ et al. (2011) Plasmodium knowlesi: reservoir hosts and tracking the emergence in humans and macaques. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002015. pmid:21490952
- 15. Akter R, Vythilingam I, Khaw LT, Qvist R, Lim YA-L, Sitam FT et al. (2015) Simian malaria in wild macaques: first report from Hulu Selangor district, Selangor, Malaysia. Malaria Journal 14: 386. pmid:26437652
- 16. Cheong WH, Warren M, Omar AH, Mahadevan S (1965) Anopheles balabacensis balabacensis identified as vector of simian malaria in Malaysia. Science 150: 1314–1315. pmid:5857000
- 17. Rattanarithikul R, Harrison BA, Harbach RE, Panthusiri P, Coleman RE (2006) Illustrated keys to the mosquitoes of Thailand. IV. Anopheles. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 37 Suppl 2: 1–128.
- 18. Cagampang–Ramos A, Darsie R. F. JR (1970) Illustrated keys to the Anopheles mosquitoes of the Philippine Islands. SAF Fifth Epidemiological Flight, PACAF, Technical Report 70:1–49.
- 19. Phillips AJ, Simon C (1995) Simple, efficient, and nondestructive DNA extraction protocol for arthropods. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88: 281–283.
- 20. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman H (1999) A genus and species specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60: 68–692.
- 21. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596–1599. pmid:17488738
- 22. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680. pmid:7984417
- 23. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406–425. pmid:3447015
- 24. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. pmid:28561359
- 25. Singh B, Sung LK, Matusop A, Radhakrishnan A, Shamsul SS, Cox-Singh J et al. (2004) A large focus of naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi infections in human beings. Lancet 363: 1017–1024. pmid:15051281
- 26. Ta TH, Hisam S, Lanza M, Jiram AI, Ismail N, Rubio JM (2014) First case of a naturally acquired human infection with Plasmodium cynomolgi. Malar J 13: 68. pmid:24564912
- 27. Bronner U, Divis PC, Färnert A, Singh B (2009) Swedish traveller with Plasmodium knowlesi malaria after visiting Malaysian Borneo. Malar J 8: 15. pmid:19146706
- 28. Li J, Wirtz RA, McConkey GA, Sattabongkot J, McCutchan TF (1994) Transition of Plasmodium vivax ribosome types corresponds to sporozoite differentiation in the mosquito. Mol Biochem Parasitol 65: 283–289. pmid:7969269
- 29. Grigg MJ, William T, Drakeley CJ, Jelip J, von Seidlein L, Barber BE et al. (2014) Factors that are associated with the risk of acquiring Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in Sabah, Malaysia: a case-control study protocol. BMJ Open 4: e006004. pmid:25149186
- 30. Collins WE, Warren M (1998) Studies on infections with two strains of Plasmodium inui from Taiwan in rhesus monkeys and different anopheline mosquitoes. J Parasitol 84: 547–551. pmid:9645855
- 31. Fornace KM, Abidin TR, Alexander N, Brock P, Grigg MJ, Murphy A et al. (2016) Association between landscape factors and spatial patterns of Plasmodium knowlesi infections in Sabah, Malaysia. Emerg Infect Dis 22: 201–208. pmid:26812373
- 32. Leclerc M, Hugot J, Durand P, Renaud F (2004) Evolutionary relationships between 15 Plasmodium species from New and Old World primates (including humans): a 18S rDNA cladistic analysis. Parasitol 129: 1–8.
- 33. Nishimoto Y, Arisue N, Kawai S, Escalante AA, Horii T, Tanabe K et al. (2008) Evolution and phylogeny of the heterogeneous cytosolic SSU rRNA genes in the genus Plasmodium. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47: 45–53. pmid:18334303
- 34. Putaporntip C, Hongsrimuang T, Seethamchai S, Kobasa T, Limkittikul K, Cui L et al. (2009) Differential prevalence of Plasmodium infections and cryptic Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in humans in Thailand. J Infect Dis 199: 1143–1150. pmid:19284284