Figures
Abstract
Background
Schistosomiasis is still a major public health burden in the tropics and subtropics. Although there is an effective chemotherapy (Praziquantel) for this disease, reinfection occurs rapidly after mass drug administration (MDA). Because the entire population do not get reinfected at the same rate, it is possible that host factors may play a dominant role in determining resistance or susceptibility to reinfection with schistosomes. Here, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed studies that reported associations between reinfection with the principal human-infecting species (S. mansoni, S. japonicum and S. haematobium) and host socio-demographic, epidemiological, immunological and genetic factors.
Methodology/Principal Findings
PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Review Library and African Journals Online public databases were searched in October 2013 to retrieve studies assessing association of host factors with reinfection with schistosomes. Meta-analysis was performed to generate pooled odds ratios and standardized mean differences as overall effect estimates for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Quality assessment of included studies, heterogeneity between studies and publication bias were also assessed. Out of the initial 2739 records, 109 studies were included in the analyses, of which only 32 studies with 37 data sets were eligible for quantitative data synthesis. Among several host factors identified, strong positive association was found with age and pre-treatment intensity, and only slightly for gender. These factors are major determinants of exposure and disease transmission. Significant positive association was found with anti-SWA IgG4 level, and a negative overall effect for association with IgE levels. This reconfirmed the concept that IgE/IgG4 balance is a major determinant of protective immunity against schistosomiasis. Other identified determinants were reported by a small number of studies to enable interpretation.
Author Summary
One of the major challenges of schistosomiasis control is that disease prevalence reverts to baseline levels after mass drug administration due to high rate of reinfection. Host factors play a major role in determining resistance or susceptibility to reinfection with schistosomiasis and other diseases. We systematically searched and analyzed studies that identified potential host determinants of reinfection with schistosomes. Among demographic variables, age but not gender was strongly associated with reinfection with schistosomes. Pretreatment infection intensity was also identified as a major determinant of reinfection. Positive association with IgG4 levels and negative association with IgE levels reconfirmed the notion that IgE/IgG4 balance is the major factor controlling protective immunity against schistosomiasis. Other factors were reported by few studies to allow correct inferences. These results contribute to our understanding of host-parasite relationship as it affects reinfection, and will be useful for planning and targeting the limited resources for intervention on high-risk groups.
Citation: Mbanefo EC, Huy NT, Wadagni AA, Eneanya CI, Nwaorgu O, Hirayama K (2014) Host Determinants of Reinfection with Schistosomes in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8(9): e3164. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003164
Editor: Darren J. Gray, University of Queensland, Australia
Received: March 1, 2014; Accepted: August 4, 2014; Published: September 11, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Mbanefo et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this study.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Schistosomiasis is still an important helminthic infection in terms of severe morbidity that can result as a consequence of infection. Over 200 million people are infected and more than 700 million people are still at risk of getting infected with schistosomiasis [1]. Although the disease can be effectively treated with Praziquantel, reinfection occurs rapidly after mass drug administration (MDA). An effective vaccine used singly or in combination with chemotherapy is the optimum approach [2]. However, such a vaccine is presently not available, although some candidates are still in the development pipeline. Since chemotherapy by MDA is presently the only available intervention in endemic areas, there is need to identify the host factors that increase susceptibility to reinfection with schistosomes for targeted intervention in high-risk groups.
In addition to the demographic, socioeconomic and epidemiological variables that may predispose certain subset of the population to reinfection, several human studies in endemic areas have provided insight into the potential resistance inducing immune response phenotypes [2]–[8]. Many of these studies have found associations between reinfection with schistosomes and IgE/IgG4 balance. Schistosomiasis has previously been shown to be under the control of the cytokine genes cluster on chromosome 5q31-q33 region, called SM1 [7], [9], [10]. It is also possible that several other immunogenetic factors in addition to this cytokine genes cluster, including the genes controlling IgE levels, may be associated with reinfection with schistosomiasis [11]–[15]. However, it remains to be determined whether variations in these genes or which of the variations in these genes are potential determinants of reinfection.
We undertook this meta-analysis to identify and describe studies that had identified host determinants, including socio-demographic, epidemiological and immunogenetic factors that are associated with reinfection with schistosomes.
Methods
Protocol registration
This study was performed in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA statement [16], [17]. This statement summarized in the PRISMA 2009 checklist is supplied as supplementary information (Figure S1). The protocol for this study was determined prior to commencement of the study, and was registered in PROSPERO-International prospective register of systematic reviews with identification number CRD42013006582 available from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42013006582.
Eligibility criteria
Studies that assessed host factors of reinfection with schistosomes were included in this review. While all eligible studies on all identified host determinants were included in the qualitative systematic review, only factors reported by more than one study and whose data can be reliably extracted were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. All relevant studies were included irrespective of study type, study design, language and date. We limited included studies to studies performed on human subjects. Reports were excluded if the reported information was on a study performed on animals, if they were case studies, correspondence or reviews, and if the data could not be reliably retrieved. Decisions on eligibility were made by two independent reviewers and all discrepancies and disagreements as regards study and report eligibility were resolved by discussion or consensus with a third reviewer, when necessary.
Information source
Studies analyzed in this review were identified by searching electronic public databases including: PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed), Scopus (http://www.scopus.com/), Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/), Cochrane Review Library (http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews) and African Journals Online (AJOL) (http://www.ajol.info/index.php/index/search). The searches were performed in October 2013 with no limit set for the dates of publications. Reference lists of eligible articles were also checked to obtain supplementary information and records of potentially relevant studies and reports. Efforts were made to contact authors for full texts, clarification on data and for supplementary data, when necessary. When responses with the necessary details were not received from authors during the duration of the study and after two reminders, such studies were excluded and classified as “full text not available”.
Search strategy
Initial searches were performed on PubMed and Scopus databases using the broad search term: “((reinfection OR re-infection OR resistance OR resistant OR susceptibility OR susceptible OR haplotype OR allele OR SNP OR “single nucleotide polymorphism” OR variant OR polymorphism OR “genetic factors” OR HLA OR “human leucocyte antigen”) AND (schistosom* OR bilharzi*))” to retrieve socio-demographic, epidemiological and immunogenetic factors. For Advanced Google Scholar, we filled in the term “schistosoma OR schistosomiasis OR schistosome OR bilharzia OR bilharziasis” in the field “with all of the word”, and the words “reinfection OR re-infection OR resistance OR resistant OR susceptibility OR susceptible OR “host factors” OR “genetic factors” OR haplotype OR allele OR SNP OR “single nucleotide polymorphism” OR variant OR polymorphism, in the field “with at least one of the words” to search the titles of articles in Google scholar database. The Cochrane Library and African Journals Online databases were searched with the broad term “schistosoma OR schistosomiasis OR bilharzia OR bilharziasis”.
Study selection
Two independent reviewers performed initial eligibility assessments on the retrieved titles and abstracts, for inclusion in the systematic review. Full texts of eligible articles were then retrieved and reviewed for inclusion in the systematic review, and further screened for inclusion in the meta-analysis using the inclusion criteria. In both steps of the screening, inclusion or exclusion of a study by both reviewers was considered conclusive, while inclusion or otherwise of studies judged eligible, controversial or ambiguous by either of the reviewers was resolved by discussion and consensus between the two reviewers. When necessary, disagreements and discrepancies were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Care was taken to identify more than one report describing a single study. When such was encountered, the overlap was identified and resolved, with contacts made to the authors when necessary. The study selection procedure was summarized in a systematic review flow chart.
Data collection process and data items
We adopted the methodology and data extraction template of The Review Manager (RevMan v5.2) from The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, 2012 for data extraction, in addition to other relevant data items as determined by the reviewers. As much as possible, the following pieces of information were obtained from eligible study reports by two independent reviewers, in a non-blinded manner: study ID (lead author name and year), study type, study period, study location, problem addressed (reinfection with schistosomes), species studied, host factors assessed, study aim, recruitment, inclusion, exclusion, informed consent, ethical approval, number of participants, study completion rate, statistical methods and funding. Given that the host factors we identified and reviewed were not set a priori, the factors were included on first observation. Thus, a study assessing several host factors was included respectively in the meta-analysis for each of the factors; while overlap from multiple reports referring to a single study was resolved to avoid duplication. When studies in different locations were separately reported in a single article, the study was included twice for each of the areas differentiated using footnotes.
Quality assessment of included studies
To assess risk of bias within selected studies, we adopted the quality assessment tool in the Cochrane RevMan v5.2 program. Briefly, this method takes into account four factors: selection bias by evaluating the sampling and randomization procedure, performance bias by assessing the level of blinding of personnel, detection bias by evaluating the level of blinding of outcome assessment, and reporting bias by assessing the presence of selective reporting in data presentation. We created a quality scoring system based on these RevMan v5.2 quality assessment items, with levels of risk of bias scored as “−1” for high risk, “0” for unclear risk and “1” for low risk of bias. These parameters (n = 4), in addition to availability of descriptions of (n = 8): host determinants, outcomes definitions, inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, method of diagnosis, mass chemotherapy, confirmation of cure prior to inclusion and follow-up period, were used to create a quality score based on 12 items on a scale of 100% for each included study (Table S1).
Assessment of risk of bias across studies
To assess the risk of bias across studies, Begg's funnel plots were generated to assess publication bias across the reviewed studies [18], [19]. Funnel plots were created for each factor by plotting the effects measure (odds ratio) against the standard error of its logarithm. The symmetries of the funnel plots were first assessed visually. When potential publication bias was identified, the trim and fill method proposed by Duvall and Tweedie [20] was applied. No further test of bias or symmetry of the funnel was performed since no publication bias was apparent.
Definition of outcomes and risk factors
The outcomes definitions were pre-determined by the reviewers, and all included studies sufficiently satisfy these criteria. Briefly, “resistance to reinfection” was defined as absence of parasite egg in multiple parasitological examinations after treatment (and confirmation of cure), followed by a follow-up period (for uniformity, data on ∼12 months follow-up were pooled) despite exposure to the parasite. Conversely, “susceptibility to reinfection” was defined as positive parasitological examination within 6 to 12 months after chemotherapy and cure. Among the risk factors identified, we adopted <10 years old as the definition for younger children. This was because all the included studies defined younger children as either <9 or <10 years old, apart from three studies that defined younger children as <13, <14 and <15 years old, respectively (Table S1). High (moderate to high) pretreatment infection intensities was defined as >50 eggs/10 ml of urine for S. haematobium, and >100 eggs/g of feces for S. mansoni and S. japonicum. For antibody levels, only data from studies utilizing the predetermined established method (ELISA) were pooled. While slight variations exist in the methods adopted in each study for estimation of antibody levels, these were ignored since similar conditions apply for the comparator in each study. Only data from studies satisfying these definitions were pooled in data synthesis.
Quantitative data synthesis (meta-analyses)
Data from eligible studies were combined using meta-analysis performed on The Review Manager (RevMan v5.2) from The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, 2012 [21]. We meta-analyzed and interpreted all host factors reported in more than one studies without setting any cut off for the minimum number of studies required for valid interpretation. For each identified host factor reported as dichotomous outcome, 2×2 contingency tables were generated and the odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. For studies reporting continuous outcomes (such as antibody levels), the input data was mean and standard deviation (SD) with the standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect measure. When the standard deviation was not reported, it was computed with the calculator function in RevMan v5.2, using other supplied data (e.g. mean, SEM, p-value etc.). For each factor analyzed, a forest plot showing the respective odds ratios or standardized mean differences with their corresponding 95% confidence interval for each study and for the pooled data were generated. The test of overall effect was assessed using the Z-statistics on RevMan v5.2 with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Subgroup analysis based on species studied was performed when necessary, especially for host factors with sufficient number of included studies.
Test of heterogeneity between studies
Heterogeneity (inconsistency) between studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q (Chi2 test) and I2 statistics in RevMan v5.2 [22]. The statistical significance for heterogeneity using the Chi2 test was set as p<0.10. Estimates of degree of heterogeneity using I2 were made by setting 25%, 50%, or 75% as limits for low, moderate or high heterogeneity, respectively [22]. The fixed-effects model with weighting of the studies was used when there was a lack of significant heterogeneity (p>0.10), while the random-effects model with weighting of the studies was used when there was heterogeneity between studies (p<0.10) and I2 values of over 50%. A major drawback of the random-effects model is that it assigns relatively equal weight to studies. Therefore, fixed-effects model was preferred over random-effects, although random-effects model was still applied when significant heterogeneity was recorded between studies.
Sensitivity analysis
For sensitivity analysis, we adopted the methods recommended for Cochrane systematic reviews. Each meta-analysis of the association of reinfection with a host factor was reanalyzed with the exclusion of each individual study to examine the effect of a single study on the outcome of meta-analysis. In addition, to examine the effect of the largest and smaller studies on the outcome of the meta-analysis, cumulative meta-analysis was performed with studies ordered according to the sample size. Also, sensitivity testing to identify the effect of subgroups was performed by subgroup analysis. This was achieved by comparing the results of the meta-analysis after exclusion of each subgroup.
Results
Study selection
Using the broad search terms, initial screening of public databases yielded 2739 study reports. Out of these studies, 295 were included for full text reading based on initial title and abstract screening using the inclusion criteria. The two reviewers agreed with 284 decisions and 11 discrepancies were resolved by discussion and consensus. For some reasons that are outlined in Figure 1, further 186 study reports were excluded and a total of 109 studies identifying 39 host factors were included for the data synthesis. However, some of the identified host determinants were reported by only 1 study and were further excluded in the final meta-analysis. Finally, 32 study reports on 26 host determinants of reinfection were included in the final quantitative data synthesis (meta-analysis). Five of these study reports were on two independent data sets [23]–[27], thus, a total of 37 datasets were included in the meta-analysis (Figure 1).
Characteristics of included studies
The characteristics of the 32 studies included in the meta-analysis were fully described in Table S1. This table outlined the study ID, study location, study period, sample size, gender ratio, age range and species studied. Out of the 32 included studies; 13 were on reinfection with Schistosoma mansoni, 7 were on S. japonicum, 10 studies assessed reinfection with S. haematobium, and 2 studies were on both S. mansoni and S. haematobium. Based on the population of subjects studied; 20 studies were on both children and adults, 11 studies were on children alone, while only 1 study was on adult subjects alone. All included studies were cohort studies (n = 32), with prospective data collection method (Table S1).
Quality assessment of included studies
Assessment of risk of bias within selected studies was performed using the quality assessment tool in Cochrane RevMan v5.2 program, modified as detailed in the Method section. The result of the quality assessment based on the 12 items on a scale of 100% showed that only 2 studies scored the maximum points (100%). The other included studies scored over 75% points in the study quality assessment, indicating their suitability for inclusion in the meta-analysis (Table S1).
Synthesis of results and meta-analysis
A total of 39 host factors comprising socio-demographic, epidemiological, immunological, genetic variants and other variables were identified from the included studies. However, 13 of these host determinants were reported in only one study and were subsequently excluded in the meta-analysis. The full list of 39 identified host factors with their corresponding statistics and effect estimates were included as supplementary information (Table S2). The summary of the meta-analyses on 26 host factors, including: the number of pooled studies, data analyses model adopted, the tests of heterogeneity, association analyses and the study references were presented in Table 1. Several demographic, epidemiological and immunological variables were identified, with some of the variables showing strong association with reinfection with schistosomes. These are further described in subsequent sections.
Association of demographic factors with reinfection with schistosomes
1. Age (<10 years old).
Age was identified as a major factor that may predispose certain subsets of the population to reinfection with schistosomes. In this review, we assessed the odds of reinfection among children less than 10 years old as compared to the rest of the population (Figure 2). Significant heterogeneity was observed among the included studies (p<0.0001, I2 = 74%), therefore, random effects model was applied for the meta-analysis. This heterogeneity was probably due to the variability of the studied populations. While some of the studies were on school-aged children (5–18 years range), others included the whole population (Table S1). Pooled odds ratio showed that younger age (<10 years old) was positively associated with reinfection with schistosomes (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.41–2.60, Z = 4.15, p<0.0001) (Figure 2).
Presented here is the meta-analysis forest plot showing the pooled odds ratio and the corresponding 95% CI, subgroup analysis by species, and assessment of heterogeneity among studies. There was a strong statistically significant positive association between younger age (<10 years old) and reinfection with schistosomes.
Sensitivity analysis by analysis of subgroups based on the species studied showed that while reinfection with S. mansoni [28]–[32] and S. haematobium [26], [33]–[40] showed strong association with age, such association was not observed when only studies on S. japonicum [24], [41], [42] were considered (Figure 2). The positive association between reinfection and age (<10 years old) lost its statistical significance (p = 0.13) when all the studies on S. haematobium subgroup were excluded from the meta-analysis (Table S3). Also, sensitivity analysis by exclusion of a single study from the analysis (Table S3) or cumulative meta-analysis (Table S4) showed that the result of the meta-analysis was robust as the inclusion or exclusion of any single study did not affect the outcome of the odds ratio, Z-score and p-value.
2. Gender (male).
We also assessed whether gender (being male) was a predisposing factor of reinfection with schistosomes. Because there was significant heterogeneity among the studies (p<0.0001, I2 = 88%), random effects model was applied. Pooled odds ratio showed that although there was a positive association of male gender and reinfection with schistosomes, the association was only slightly statistically significant (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.02–2.05, Z = 2.09, p = 0.04). Sensitivity analysis by subgroup analysis based on the species studied showed that statistically significant positive association was observed for association of male gender with reinfection with S. mansoni (p = 0.02) [25], [28]–[32], [43]–[45] and S. japonicum (p = 0.002) [24], [42], [46], while the association for reinfection with S. haematobium [26], [34]–[36], [39], [40] was not statistically significant (p = 0.30) (Figure 3). The exclusion of S. mansoni or S. japonicum subgroups in the meta-analysis yielded effect measures which were not statistically significant (p = 0.22 and p = 0.23, respectively). Conversely, the exclusion of data from S. haematobium subgroup significantly affected the result of the meta-analysis (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.34–2.55, Z = 3.76, p = 0.0002) (Table S3). Furthermore, sensitivity analyses by exclusion of single studies (Table S3) and cumulative meta-analysis (Table S4) showed that two large studies [26], [34] significantly affected the result of the pooled effect estimate (Z-score and p-value).
Presented here is the meta-analysis forest plot showing the pooled odds ratio and the corresponding 95% CI, subgroup analysis by species, and assessment of heterogeneity among studies. The observed positive association between reinfection and gender was only slightly significant.
Association of epidemiological factors with reinfection with schistosomes
Three major epidemiological factors of reinfection were identified, including: pre-treatment infection intensity [26], [27], [30], [36], [40], rate of exposure [36], [40], [42], [44] and levels of transmission in the studied area [37], [42], [44], [47]. There was strong positive association between high (moderate to high) pretreatment infection intensities (>50 eggs/10 ml of urine for S. haematobium, and >100 eggs/g of feces for S. mansoni and S. japonicum) and reinfection with schistosomes (OR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.97–4.12, Z = 5.57, p<0.0001). (Figure 4A). The positive association between high rates of exposure (we defined high rate of exposure as “above average” exposure rate for a specific population as determined by authors) and reinfection with schistosomes was not statistically significant (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 0.93–5.85, Z = 1.81, p = 0.07) (Figure 4B). Although there was also a positive correlation between residence in high transmission area and reinfection, the association was not statistically significant (OR = 2.24, 95% CI = 0.63–7.91, Z = 1.25, p = 0.21) (Figure 4C).
(A) Meta-analysis forest plot for the association of reinfection with high pretreatment intensity showing positive association with reinfection. (B) Forest plot for the association of reinfection with high rate of exposure showing association with reinfection without statistical significance. (C) Meta-analysis forest plot for the association of reinfection with residence in high transmission area did not show statistically significant association with reinfection.
Association of immunological factors with reinfection with schistosomes
Among the immunological factors identified in this review, most studies reported association between humoral responses and probability of reinfection with schistosomes. An interesting finding was a negative standardized mean difference observed in the association between IgE levels and reinfection with schistosomes (Figure 5 and Figure S2) inferred from meta-analysis on 8 studies [23], [31], [39], [44], [48]–[51]. However, subgroup analyses of these associations with IgE levels against adult worm antigen (SWA) (Figure 5A) and egg antigen (SEA) (Figure 5B) were not statistically significant (For anti-SWA IgE, SMD = −0.06, 95% CI = −0.59–0.46, Z = 0.23, p = 0.82; for anti-SEA IgE, SMD = −0.03, 95% CI = −0.38–0.32, Z = 0.15, p = 0.88). Sensitivity analysis by exclusion of individual studies showed that the exclusion of any of the included studies in this meta-analysis did not affect the pooled effect estimates (Table S3).
(A) Meta-analysis forest plot for the association of reinfection with anti-SWA IgE levels showing the pooled standardized mean difference and the corresponding 95% CI and assessment of heterogeneity among studies. The observed negative overall effect was not statistically significant. (B) Meta-analysis forest plot for the association of reinfection with anti-SEA IgE levels showing the pooled standardized mean difference and the corresponding 95% CI and assessment of heterogeneity among studies. The observed negative overall effect was not statistically significant.
Conversely, strong positive association was observed between IgG4 levels and reinfection with schistosomes (Figure 6 and Figure S2). However, while the association between reinfection and anti-SWA IgG4 levels was statistically significant (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.26–0.68, Z = 4.35, p<0.0001) (Figure 6A); the association between reinfection and anti-SEA IgG4 levels was not statistically significant (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI = −0.13–0.95, Z = 1.48, p = 0.14) (Figure 6B). Sensitivity analysis showed that while the exclusion of any single study did not affect the result of the association between reinfection with schistosomes and anti-SWA IgG4 levels, the exclusion of one study [39] resulted in positive association with statistical significance for the association of anti-SEA IgG4 with reinfection with schistosomes (Table S3).
(A) Meta-analysis forest plot for the association of reinfection with anti-SWA IgG4 levels showing the pooled standardized mean difference and the corresponding 95% CI and assessment of heterogeneity among studies. IgG4 level was highly significantly associated with reinfection with schistosomes. (B) Meta-analysis forest plot for the association of reinfection with anti-SEA IgG4 levels showing the pooled standardized mean difference and the corresponding 95% CI and assessment of heterogeneity among studies. The observed positive overall effect was not statistically significant.
Equally, positive associations were observed for association of reinfection with schistosomes with levels of IgG1, IgG2, IgA and IgM against SWA (Figure S3A, B, D and E) and SEA (Figure S4A, B, D and E); while negative association was observed between reinfection and levels of IgG3 (Figure S3C and Figure S4C). However, there were limited number of studies reporting these factors and the associations were not statistically significant except for IgG1.
Some cellular immune response factors were also identified. However, there were consistently small number of studies reporting these factors, and the associations were not statistically significant (Table 1 and Table S2). We observed negative standardized mean differences from the associations of reinfection with levels of IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, TNF-α and CD4+ T-helper cells; and positive effect estimates from the association of reinfection with proportions of CD8, CD19 and CD16 positive cells. Other factors including the HLA gene polymorphisms, levels of total protein, albumin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins and very low-density lipoproteins were also identified. However, these factors were all reported by only one study (Table S2).
Risk of bias across studies
To assess outcome reporting bias and publication bias across studies, we generated funnel plots for two representative host factors with sufficient number of included studies (age and gender) by plotting the odds ratio (OR) on the x-axis, and the standard error of the log of odds ratio (SE(log[OR]) on the y-axis (Figure 7). The funnel plot showed the typical cone appearance with good symmetry, with the studies apparently distributed on either side of the pooled outcome effect estimate (Figure 7). Two outlier studies [29], [32] observed from the association of reinfection with age were of significantly small size (Figure 7A). To exclude potential small study effect, these studies were excluded and their exclusion did not affect the result of the pooled effect size. Equally, we also applied the trim and fill method proposed by Duvall and Tweedie [20] by adding studies equivalent to these outliers, which appear to be missing. Again, this did not affect the symmetry and the result of the pooled effect estimate. Also, subgroup analysis showed that all studies on S. japonicum were on the left side of the cone unlike the other species. However, exclusion of this subgroup (Table S3), or trim and fill method did not affect the results of the combined effect estimates. These indicate that there is minimal publication bias in these studies and no further test of bias was carried out.
(A) Funnel plots for assessment of publication bias for studies assessing association of reinfection with age showing lack of significant publication bias in the included studies. (B) Funnel plots for assessment of publication bias for gender.
Discussion
Identification of host factors that predispose certain subsets of the population to reinfection with schistosomes, and indeed any other disease, is a major strategy that will guide planning and tailoring of community interventions to target high-risk groups. It is also important for targeting health education and limited resources for disease prevention. Our meta-analysis has identified some of the host determinants of reinfection with schistosomes. The outcomes showed strong positive association with age, and pretreatment intensity of infection, and only slight association with gender. Also, the IgE/IgG4 balance, which is well recognized as a major determinant of reinfection [2]–[5], was again reconfirmed by our meta-analysis. Our results showed that younger age and pretreatment intensity of infection, which are connected with behavioral differences in population subsets and disease transmission, play predominant role in determining the probability of reinfection with schistosomes. This is due to differences in rate of exposure, but not necessarily absence of protective immunity [52]. Conversely, the immunological parameters related with protective immunity, which may itself be associated with age and accumulated experience [40], [52]–[56]; also play major role in determining protection from infection but not exposure to the pathogen. It can therefore be inferred that exposure and age-related factors play a predominant role in disease transmission, while immunological factors control protective immunity against reinfection.
Younger age was positively associated with the rate of reinfection. Schistosomes are transmitted through skin penetration by the infective cercariae during water contact activities. Given that younger children are mainly involved in such high-risk water contact activities like domestic chores and recreation, this result is expected and is consistent with the results of other big intervention studies [26], [30], [34], [36]. However, species based subgroup analysis did not show positive association between age and reinfection with S. japonicum. It is not clear whether this is related to differences in the study cultural settings since unlike S. haematobium and S. mansoni; the distribution of S. japonicum is limited to South East Asia. However, limited number of studies assessed reinfection with S. japonicum, and unlike studies on the other species which sometimes involved only children, all studies on S. japonicum involved both adults and children; a major source of heterogeneity among the included studies. Also, S. japonicum has some peculiarities that may also contribute to the observed heterogeneity, including: its zoonotic nature, the generally much lower prevalence (especially in recent decades) and the fact that exposure is often mainly during occupational activities instead of domestic and recreational ones.
Our analyses showed only slight association between gender and reinfection with schistosomes. Although boys and girls may have major behavioral but not biological differences that can affect rate of reinfection [28], this distinction is very minimal among the younger age group. Even among the older children, there are only changes in the kind of water contact activities, which may not necessarily translate to major change in rate of exposure to the disease. Surprisingly, subgroup analysis showed strong positive association between gender and reinfection with S. japonicum. Although this may be due to differences in gender role in various cultural settings, the observed association may not be very reliable since the analysis was based on only four studies on S. japonicum. Also on cultural differences, Fulford et al. (1996) and other workers identified that patterns of water contact vary dramatically between even culturally rather similar communities [57], [58]. Therefore, absence of strong association with gender even with apparent behavioral differences between genders remains inconclusive. This implies that gender difference in reinfection pattern varies in difference cultural settings [58].
Apart from the demographic factors, three major epidemiological factors were positively correlated with reinfection: high pre-treatment intensity, high rate of exposure and residence in high transmission area. High pretreatment intensity is related to possibility of failed or incomplete treatment [36], especially when studies did not include a follow up study dedicated to confirming cure in the treated population. As would be expected, there was also a positive correlation between reinfection and high exposure rate as inferred from the four studies assessing this factor, but the association was not statistically significant. Although some studies distinguished between high transmission areas and low transmission areas based on relative availability of potable water and sanitation [36], there was no association between residence in either of these areas, and rate of reinfection with schistosomes. This could be because water contact activities do not depend exclusively on lack of domestic water or sanitation, but is a function of several interrelated factors, including: perception, distinct cultural practices and the need for recreation. These render residence in either high or low transmission areas less important as a risk factor of reinfection with schistosomes.
Among the immunological factors identified, most studies reported association between different antibody isotype levels and probability of reinfection with schistosomes. Interestingly, a negative association was recorded from the association between IgE levels and reinfection with schistosomes. On the other hand, strong positive association was observed between IgG4 levels and reinfection with schistosomes. These observations are consistent with the consensus perspective that IgE/IgG4 balance plays central role in controlling protective immunity against infection or reinfection with schistosomes [2]–[5], [8], [31], [38], [39], [41], [44], [56], [59]–[63]. While increased IgE levels are protective against infection and reinfection, elevated IgG4 levels increase predisposition to infection and reinfection. Recent studies have found strong association between IgE levels and certain loci in the human genome, including: the cytokine gene cluster on chromosome 5q31-q33 (SM1), which also controls infection with schistosomiasis [7], [64]–[67]; FCER1A on chromosome 1q23, which is the gene encoding the alpha chain of the high affinity receptor for IgE [11], [14]; STAT4 on chromosome 2q32 [12], [64] which controls Th1 development; STAT6 on chromosome 12q13 [12], [13], [15], [64] and GATA3 on chromosome 10p15 [12], [64] which control Th2 development; and the Th2 cytokine receptor cluster in 16p12 region of the human genome [7], [64]. We had expected to identify studies assessing association between reinfection and several immunogenetic factors including variations in these loci; however, there were few or no studies on the host immunogenetic factors of reinfection with schistosomes, an important theme for further research. We are presently proposing a study that will identify association between major single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these loci, and reinfection with schistosomes and other helminthic infections.
Our analyses on cellular immune response factors showed negative effect estimates for the associations of reinfection with levels of IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-10, TNF-α and CD4+ T-helper cells; and positive effect estimates for the association of reinfection with the proportions of CD8+, CD19+ and CD16+ cells. However, these inferences are not very reliable since there was consistently limited number of studies reporting these host factors, and the associations were not statistically significant (Table 1 and Table S2). An interesting observation though is the negative effect estimate recorded from the association of reinfection with schistosomes with levels of IFN-γ. Studies in both human and animal models have shown that protective immunity against schistosomiasis is mainly Th1 dependent [2], [4], [6], [68]–[75]. The egg antigen drives a dominant Th2 response. Thus, induction and sustenance of a Th1 environment at the acute phase of infection thru onset of egg deposition is required for sterile and anti-pathology protection [68], [69], [75]–[78]. Negative effect estimates were also recorded from the association of reinfection with levels of IL-5 and IL-13. This is consistent with the notion that these cytokines control release and survival of eosinophil [31], which has been shown to induce antibody dependent protective immunity against schistosomiasis [79], [80]. Other factors including the HLA gene polymorphisms, levels of total protein, albumin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins and very low-density lipoproteins were also identified. However, these factors were all reported by only one study (Table S2).
In conclusions, this study has identified the major host determinants of resistance or susceptibility to reinfection with schistosomes; although we had anticipated studies on immunogenetic factors in addition to the identified socio-demographic, epidemiological and immunological factors. Therefore, there is need to explore the association between reinfection with schistosomes and host immunogenetic factors, especially the variations in the genes controlling immune response against schistosomiasis. This will be an interesting subject for further studies. Strong association with age and water contact related factors has reaffirmed that these factors play dominant role in determining exposure to pathogen and disease transmission. We also reconfirmed the major role played by IgE/IgG4 balance in controlling protective immunity against infection and reinfection with schistosomes.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
The PRISMA 2009 checklist. This study followed the guidelines of the PRISMA statement for conduct and reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003164.s001
(DOC)
Figure S2.
Association of IgE and IgG4 levels with reinfection with schistosomes (detailed). This is the same data as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, except that the details of calculation of continuous variables are shown.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003164.s002
(PDF)
Figure S3.
Association of levels of anti-SWA antibody isotypes with reinfection with schistosomes. Forest plots for the association of reinfection with IgG1 (A), IgG2 (B), IgG3 (C), IgA (D), and IgM (E).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003164.s003
(TIF)
Figure S4.
Association of levels of anti-SEA antibody isotypes with reinfection with schistosomes. Forest plot for the association of reinfection with IgG1 (A), IgG2 (B), IgG3 (C), IgA (D), and IgM (E).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003164.s004
(TIF)
Table S1.
Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis of host factors of reinfection with schistosomes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003164.s005
(XLSX)
Table S2.
Summary of overall effect measures for host determinants of reinfection identified in this study. This Table is similar to Table 1, but other host determinants reported by only one study are listed as well.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003164.s006
(DOC)
Table S3.
Sensitivity analysis by exclusion of individual studies or subgroups from the meta-analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003164.s007
(XLS)
Table S4.
Sensitivity analysis by sample size ordered cumulative meta-analysis for the association of age and gender with reinfection with schistosomes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003164.s008
(XLS)
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to the members of the Department of Immunogenetics, Nagasaki University Institute of Tropical Medicine for useful suggestions and insightful discussions.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: ECM NTH. Performed the experiments: ECM NTH AAW. Analyzed the data: ECM NTH AAW CIE ON KH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ECM NTH CIE ON KH. Wrote the paper: ECM NTH. Revised the manuscript for important intellectual content: CIE ON KH.
References
- 1. King CH (2010) Parasites and poverty: the case of schistosomiasis. Acta Trop 113: 95–104.
- 2. McManus DP, Bartley PB (2004) A vaccine against Asian schistosomiasis. Parasitol Int 53: 163–173.
- 3. Figueiredo JP, Oliveira RR, Cardoso LS, Barnes KC, Grant AV, et al. (2012) Adult worm-specific IgE/IgG4 balance is associated with low infection levels of Schistosoma mansoni in an endemic area. Parasite Immunol 34: 604–610.
- 4. Acosta LP, Waine G, Aligui GD, Tiu WU, Olveda RM, et al. (2002) Immune correlate study on human Schistosoma japonicum in a well-defined population in Leyte, Philippines: II. Cellular immune responses to S. japonicum recombinant and native antigens. Acta Trop 84: 137–149.
- 5. Jiz M, Friedman JF, Leenstra T, Jarilla B, Pablo A, et al. (2009) Immunoglobulin E (IgE) responses to paramyosin predict resistance to reinfection with Schistosoma japonicum and are attenuated by IgG4. Infect Immun 77: 2051–2058.
- 6. Brito CF, Caldas IR, Coura Filho P, Correa-Oliveira R, Oliveira SC (2000) CD4+ T cells of schistosomiasis naturally resistant individuals living in an endemic area produce interferon-gamma and tumour necrosis factor-alpha in response to the recombinant 14KDA Schistosoma mansoni fatty acid-binding protein. Scand J Immunol 51: 595–601.
- 7. Isnard A, Chevillard C (2008) Recent advances in the characterization of genetic factors involved in human susceptibility to infection by schistosomiasis. Curr Genomics 9: 290–300.
- 8. Dessein AJ, Couissinier P, Demeure C, Rihet P, Kohlstaedt S, et al. (1992) Environmental, genetic and immunological factors in human resistance to Schistosoma mansoni. Immunol Invest 21: 423–453.
- 9. Kouriba B, Chevillard C, Bream JH, Argiro L, Dessein H, et al. (2005) Analysis of the 5q31-q33 locus shows an association between IL13-1055C/T IL-13-591A/G polymorphisms and Schistosoma haematobium infections. J Immunol 174: 6274–6281.
- 10. Isnard A, Kouriba B, Doumbo O, Chevillard C (2011) Association of rs7719175, located in the IL13 gene promoter, with Schistosoma haematobium infection levels and identification of a susceptibility haplotype. Genes Immun 12: 31–39.
- 11. Weidinger S, Gieger C, Rodriguez E, Baurecht H, Mempel M, et al. (2008) Genome-wide scan on total serum IgE levels identifies FCER1A as novel susceptibility locus. PLoS Genet 4: e1000166.
- 12. Pykäläinen M, Kinos R, Valkonen S, Rydman P, Kilpeläinen M, et al. (2005) Association analysis of common variants of STAT6, GATA3, and STAT4 to asthma and high serum IgE phenotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115: 80–87.
- 13. Weidinger S, Klopp N, Wagenpfeil S, Rümmler L, Schedel M, et al. (2004) Association of a STAT 6 haplotype with elevated serum IgE levels in a population based cohort of white adults. J Med Genet 41: 658–663.
- 14. Potaczek DP, Nishiyama C, Sanak M, Szczeklik A, Okumura K (2009) Genetic variability of the high-affinity IgE receptor alpha-subunit (FcepsilonRIalpha). Immunol Res 45: 75–84.
- 15. He H, Isnard A, Kouriba B, Cabantous S, Dessein A, et al. (2008) A STAT6 gene polymorphism is associated with high infection levels in urinary schistosomiasis. Genes Immun 9: 195–206.
- 16. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6: e1000100.
- 17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339: b2535.
- 18. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315: 629–634.
- 19. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50: 1088–1101.
- 20. Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56: 455–463.
- 21.
Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ (2008) Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta-Analysis. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. Second Edition. doi: 10.1002/9780470693926.ch15 ed. London UK: BMJ Publishing Group.
- 22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557–560.
- 23. Li Y, Yu DB, Li YS, Luo XS, Liang YS, et al. (2002) Antibody isotype responses to Schistosoma japonicum antigens in subjects from a schistosomiasis area with repeated praziquantel chemotherapy compared with a new endemic zone in Hunan Province, P.R. China. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96: 210–215.
- 24. Acosta LP, Aligui GD, Tiu WU, McManus DP, Olveda RM (2002) Immune correlate study on human Schistosoma japonicum in a well-defined population in Leyte, Philippines: I. Assessment of ‘resistance’ versus ‘susceptibility’ to S. japonicum infection. Acta Trop 84: 127–136.
- 25. Gundersen SG, Birrie H, Torvik HP, Medhin G, Mengesha H (1998) Delayed reinfection of Schistosoma mansoni in the Blue Nile Valley of western Ethiopia 10 years after mass chemotherapy. Acta Trop 70: 35–42.
- 26. King CH, Lombardi G, Lombardi C, Greenblatt R, Hodder S, et al. (1988) Chemotherapy-based control of schistosomiasis haematobia. I. Metrifonate versus praziquantel in control of intensity and prevalence of infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 39: 295–305.
- 27. Etard JF, Borel E, Segala C (1990) Schistosoma haematobium infection in Mauritania: two years of follow-up after a targeted chemotherapy–a life-table approach of the risk of reinfection. Parasitology 100 (Pt 3) 399–406.
- 28. Pinot de Moira A, Fulford AJ, Kabatereine NB, Ouma JH, Booth M, et al. (2010) Analysis of complex patterns of human exposure and immunity to Schistosomiasis mansoni: the influence of age, sex, ethnicity and IgE. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e820.
- 29. Pinot de Moira A, Jones FM, Wilson S, Tukahebwa E, Fitzsimmons CM, et al. (2013) Effects of treatment on IgE responses against parasite allergen-like proteins and immunity to reinfection in childhood schistosome and hookworm coinfections. Infect Immun 81: 23–32.
- 30. Tukahebwa EM, Vennervald BJ, Nuwaha F, Kabatereine NB, Magnussen P (2013) Comparative efficacy of one versus two doses of praziquantel on cure rate of Schistosoma mansoni infection and re-infection in Mayuge District, Uganda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 107: 397–404.
- 31. Caldas IR, Correa-Oliveira R, Colosimo E, Carvalho OS, Massara CL, et al. (2000) Susceptibility and resistance to Schistosoma mansoni reinfection: parallel cellular and isotypic immunologic assessment. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62: 57–64.
- 32. Roberts M, Butterworth AE, Kimani G, Kamau T, Fulford AJ, et al. (1993) Immunity after treatment of human schistosomiasis: association between cellular responses and resistance to reinfection. Infect Immun 61: 4984–4993.
- 33. Medhat A, Shehata M, Bucci K, Mohamed S, Dief AD, et al. (1998) Increased interleukin-4 and interleukin-5 production in response to Schistosoma haematobium adult worm antigens correlates with lack of reinfection after treatment. J Infect Dis 178: 512–519.
- 34. Saathoff E, Olsen A, Magnussen P, Kvalsvig JD, Becker W, et al. (2004) Patterns of Schistosoma haematobium infection, impact of praziquantel treatment and re-infection after treatment in a cohort of schoolchildren from rural KwaZulu-Natal/South Africa. BMC Infect Dis 4: 40.
- 35. Ofoezie IE (2000) Patterns of reinfection following praziquantel treatment of urinary schistosomiasis at a period of low transmission. Acta Trop 75: 123–126.
- 36. Satayathum SA, Muchiri EM, Ouma JH, Whalen CC, King CH (2006) Factors affecting infection or reinfection with Schistosoma haematobium in coastal Kenya: survival analysis during a nine-year, school-based treatment program. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 83–92.
- 37. Mutapi F, Ndhlovu PD, Hagan P, Woolhouse ME (1999) A comparison of re-infection rates with Schistosoma haematobium following chemotherapy in areas with high and low levels of infection. Parasite Immunol 21: 253–259.
- 38. Hagan P, Blumenthal UJ, Dunn D, Simpson AJ, Wilkins HA (1991) Human IgE, IgG4 and resistance to reinfection with Schistosoma haematobium. Nature 349: 243–245.
- 39. Grogan JL, Kremsner PG, van Dam GJ, Deelder AM, Yazdanbakhsh M (1997) Anti-schistosome IgG4 and IgE at 2 years after chemotherapy: infected versus uninfected individuals. J Infect Dis 176: 1344–1350.
- 40. Etard JF, Audibert M, Dabo A (1995) Age-acquired resistance and predisposition to reinfection with Schistosoma haematobium after treatment with praziquantel in Mali. Am J Trop Med Hyg 52: 549–558.
- 41. Zhang Z, Wu H, Chen S, Hu L, Xie Z, et al. (1997) Association between IgE antibody against soluble egg antigen and resistance to reinfection with Schistosoma japonicum. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 91: 606–608.
- 42. Wu Z, Bu K, Yuan L, Yang G, Zhu J, et al. (1993) Factors contributing to reinfection with schistosomiasis japonica after treatment in the lake region of China. Acta Trop 54: 83–88.
- 43. Fonseca CT, Cunha-Neto E, Goldberg AC, Kalil J, de Jesus AR, et al. (2005) Identification of paramyosin T cell epitopes associated with human resistance to Schistosoma mansoni reinfection. Clin Exp Immunol 142: 539–547.
- 44. Oliveira RR, Figueiredo JP, Cardoso LS, Jabar RL, Souza RP, et al. (2012) Factors associated with resistance to Schistosoma mansoni infection in an endemic area of Bahia, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 86: 296–305.
- 45. Eltayeb NM, Mukhtar MM, Mohamed AB (2013) Epidemiology of schistosomiasis in Gezira area Central Sudan and analysis of cytokine profiles. Asian Pac J Trop Med 6: 119–125.
- 46. Li YS, Sleigh AC, Ross AG, Li Y, Williams GM, et al. (1999) A 2-year prospective study in China provides epidemiological evidence for resistance in humans to re-infection with Schistosoma japonicum. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 93: 629–642.
- 47. Garba A, Lamine MS, Barkire N, Djibo A, Sofo B, et al. (2013) Efficacy and safety of two closely spaced doses of praziquantel against Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni and re-infection patterns in school-aged children in Niger. Acta Trop 128: 334–344.
- 48. van den Biggelaar AH, Borrmann S, Kremsner P, Yazdanbakhsh M (2002) Immune responses induced by repeated treatment do not result in protective immunity to Schistosoma haematobium: interleukin (IL)-5 and IL-10 responses. J Infect Dis 186: 1474–1482.
- 49. Li Y, Sleigh AC, Ross AG, Zhang X, Williams GM, et al. (2001) Human susceptibility to Schistosoma japonicum in China correlates with antibody isotypes to native antigens. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 95: 441–448.
- 50. Matoso LF, Oliveira-Prado R, Abreu MN, Fujiwara RT, Loverde PT, et al. (2013) Longitudinal analysis of antigen specific response in individuals with Schistosoma mansoni infection in an endemic area of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg
- 51. Reis EA, Reis MG, Silva Rde C, Carmo TM, Assis AM, et al. (2006) Biochemical and immunologic predictors of efficacy of treatment or reinfection risk for Schistosoma mansoni. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 904–909.
- 52. Butterworth AE, Fulford AJ, Dunne DW, Ouma JH, Sturrock RF (1988) Longitudinal studies on human schistosomiasis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 321: 495–511.
- 53. Black CL, Mwinzi PN, Muok EM, Abudho B, Fitzsimmons CM, et al. (2010) Influence of exposure history on the immunology and development of resistance to human Schistosomiasis mansoni. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e637.
- 54. Sturrock RF, Kimani R, Cottrell BJ, Butterworth AE, Seitz HM, et al. (1983) Observations on possible immunity to reinfection among Kenyan schoolchildren after treatment for Schistosoma mansoni. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 77: 363–371.
- 55. Hagan P, Blumenthal UJ, Chaudri M, Greenwood BM, Hayes RJ, et al. (1987) Resistance to reinfection with Schistosoma haematobium in Gambian children: analysis of their immune responses. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 81: 938–946.
- 56. Fitzsimmons CM, Jones FM, Pinot de Moira A, Protasio AV, Khalife J, et al. (2012) Progressive cross-reactivity in IgE responses: an explanation for the slow development of human immunity to schistosomiasis? Infect Immun 80: 4264–4270.
- 57. Fulford AJ, Ouma JH, Kariuki HC, Thiongo FW, Klumpp R, et al. (1996) Water contact observations in Kenyan communities endemic for schistosomiasis: methodology and patterns of behaviour. Parasitology 113 (Pt 3) 223–241.
- 58. Pinot de Moira A, Kabatereine NB, Dunne DW, Booth M (2011) Understanding ethnic differences in behaviour relating to Schistosoma mansoni re-infection after mass treatment. J Biosoc Sci 43: 185–209.
- 59. Abd El-Aal AA, El-Arousy MH, El-Gendy AM, Tunkul Ael K, Ismail SA, et al. (2005) Early post-treatment immunoglobulin profile in human schistosomiasis. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 35: 167–180.
- 60. Demeure CE, Rihet P, Abel L, Ouattara M, Bourgois A, et al. (1993) Resistance to Schistosoma mansoni in humans: influence of the IgE/IgG4 balance and IgG2 in immunity to reinfection after chemotherapy. J Infect Dis 168: 1000–1008.
- 61. Dunne DW, Butterworth AE, Fulford AJ, Ouma JH, Sturrock RF (1992) Human IgE responses to Schistosoma mansoni and resistance to reinfection. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 87 Suppl 4: 99–103.
- 62. Dunne DW, Butterworth AE, Fulford AJ, Kariuki HC, Langley JG, et al. (1992) Immunity after treatment of human schistosomiasis: association between IgE antibodies to adult worm antigens and resistance to reinfection. Eur J Immunol 22: 1483–1494.
- 63. Black CL, Muok EM, Mwinzi PN, Carter JM, Karanja DM, et al. (2010) Increases in levels of schistosome-specific immunoglobulin E and CD23(+) B cells in a cohort of Kenyan children undergoing repeated treatment and reinfection with Schistosoma mansoni. J Infect Dis 202: 399–405.
- 64. Potaczek DP, Kabesch M (2012) Current concepts of IgE regulation and impact of genetic determinants. Clin Exp Allergy 42: 852–871.
- 65. Kouriba B, Chevillard C, Bream JH, Argiro L, Dessein H, et al. (2005) Analysis of the 5q31-q33 locus shows an association between IL13-1055C/T IL-13-591A/G polymorphisms and Schistosoma haematobium infections. J Immunol 174: 6274–6281.
- 66. Ellis MK, Zhao ZZ, Chen HG, Montgomery GW, Li YS, et al. (2007) Analysis of the 5q31 33 locus shows an association between single nucleotide polymorphism variants in the IL-5 gene and symptomatic infection with the human blood fluke, Schistosoma japonicum. J Immunol 179: 8366–8371.
- 67. Rodrigues V Jr, Piper K, Couissinier-Paris P, Bacelar O, Dessein H, et al. (1999) Genetic control of schistosome infections by the SM1 locus of the 5q31-q33 region is linked to differentiation of type 2 helper T lymphocytes. Infect Immun 67: 4689–4692.
- 68. Ahmad G, Torben W, Zhang W, Wyatt M, Siddiqui AA (2009) Sm-p80-based DNA vaccine formulation induces potent protective immunity against Schistosoma mansoni. Parasite Immunol 31: 156–161.
- 69. Anderson S, Shires VL, Wilson RA, Mountford AP (1998) In the absence of IL-12, the induction of Th1-mediated protective immunity by the attenuated schistosome vaccine is impaired, revealing an alternative pathway with Th2-type characteristics. Eur J Immunol 28: 2827–2838.
- 70. Gan Y, Shi YE, Bu LY, Zhu XH, Ning CX, et al. (2004) Immune responses against Schistosoma japonicum after vaccinating mice with a multivalent DNA vaccine encoding integrated membrane protein Sj23 and cytokine interleukin-12. Chin Med J (Engl) 117: 1842–1846.
- 71. Mountford AP, Anderson S, Wilson RA (1996) Induction of Th1 cell-mediated protective immunity to Schistosoma mansoni by co-administration of larval antigens and IL-12 as an adjuvant. J Immunol 156: 4739–4745.
- 72. Wilson RA (1998) Interferon gamma is a key cytokine in lung phase immunity to schistosomes but what is its precise role? Braz J Med Biol Res 31: 157–161.
- 73. Wynn TA, Reynolds A, James S, Cheever AW, Caspar P, et al. (1996) IL-12 enhances vaccine-induced immunity to schistosomes by augmenting both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses against the parasite. J Immunol 157: 4068–4078.
- 74. Xu X, Zhang D, Sun W, Zhang Q, Zhang J, et al. (2009) A Schistosoma japonicum chimeric protein with a novel adjuvant induced a polarized Th1 immune response and protection against liver egg burdens. BMC Infect Dis 9: 54.
- 75. Zhang Y, Taylor MG, Johansen MV, Bickle QD (2001) Vaccination of mice with a cocktail DNA vaccine induces a Th1-type immune response and partial protection against Schistosoma japonicum infection. Vaccine 20: 724–730.
- 76. Hewitson JP, Hamblin PA, Mountford AP (2005) Immunity induced by the radiation-attenuated schistosome vaccine. Parasite Immunol 27: 271–280.
- 77. Cardoso FC, Macedo GC, Gava E, Kitten GT, Mati VL, et al. (2008) Schistosoma mansoni tegument protein Sm29 is able to induce a Th1-type of immune response and protection against parasite infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2: e308.
- 78. Zhang R, Yoshida A, Kumagai T, Kawaguchi H, Maruyama H, et al. (2001) Vaccination with calpain induces a Th1-biased protective immune response against Schistosoma japonicum. Infect Immun 69: 386–391.
- 79. Capron M, Capron A (1992) Effector functions of eosinophils in schistosomiasis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 87 Suppl 4: 167–170.
- 80. Ganley-Leal LM, Mwinzi PN, Cetre-Sossah CB, Andove J, Hightower AW, et al. (2006) Correlation between eosinophils and protection against reinfection with Schistosoma mansoni and the effect of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 coinfection in humans. Infect Immun 74: 2169–2176.
- 81. Martins-Filho OA, Cunha-Melo JR, Lambertucci JR, Silveira AM, Colley DG, et al. (1999) Clinical forms of human Schistosoma mansoni infection are associated with differential activation of T-cell subsets and costimulatory molecules. Dig Dis Sci 44: 570–577.