Introduction

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne neglected infectious disease of worldwide incidence and its most severe clinical form is visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Each year VL causes an estimated 500,000 new cases and more than 59,000 deaths [1], a death toll that is only surpassed by malaria among the parasitic diseases [2]. Furthermore, both figures are approximations since VL is frequently not recognized or not reported [3]–[4]. Leishmaniasis is transmitted through the bite of two phlebotomine sandfly genera, Phlebotomus in the Old World and Lutzomyia in the New World. In Latin America VL is caused by Leishmania infantum chagasi and transmitted by Lutzomyia longipalpis [5]. This phlebotomine sandfly is only found in the New World, with a wide distribution from Mexico to Argentina [6]. The geographical distribution of leishmaniasis has undoubtedly expanded and is now being reported in areas that were previously non-endemic. The worldwide phenomenon of urbanisation, closely related to the sharp increase in migration, is one of the major risk factors that is making leishmaniasis a growing public health concern for many countries around the world [7] and Argentina is not an exception. Between 1925 and 1989 only 14 leishmaniasis human cases were reported in Argentina and none was attributed to Le. chagasi. Moreover, there were only two isolated reports of Lu. longipalpis (in 1953 and 2000) which were not associated with VL [8]. Nevertheless, this situation has changed dramatically, mostly due to an indiscriminate advance of urbanisation, and the first Argentine VL outbreak was recently reported [9]. From 2006 to date the morbidity and mortality toll of this disease have amounted to 83 human cases (35% corresponding to children under ten years of age), 7 deaths and more than 7,000 infected dogs (National Health Surveillance System, Epidemiology Bureau, National Ministry of Health, Argentina).

In the natural environment, phlebotomine larvae feed on organic matter from soil [10], while adults from both sexes feed on sugars from plant sources [11]–[12]. Only female adults need blood to obtain necessary proteins for the development of their eggs [5]. It is widely accepted that many insects derive their microbiota from the surrounding environment, such as the phylloplane of food plants or the skin of the animal host, and although the degree of persistence of strains of the ingested species is unknown, these microorganisms can influence the insect life cycle [13]. To comprehensively understand the biology of insects, microorganisms must be considered as a very important component of the ecological system [14]. Moreover, an inventory of the associated microbiota of phlebotomine sandflies, especially of wild specimens, would aid in understanding the annual and regional variations recorded for this disease [15] and in the development of novel strategies for controlling these vectors, among others [13]. One serious obstacle for the biological control of VL sandfly vectors is that their precise breeding sites are poorly known. Furthermore, its practical application seems to be limited to the adult VL vector stage [16] because, as Lu. longipalpis larvae appear to be thinly dispersed [17], this complicates the employment of biolarvicides in the field.

There is scanty information on the microbial colonisation of Lu. longipalpis and it is not yet clear if they possess an indigenous community. Previously, midgut bacteria were examined from wild and laboratory reared Lu. longipalpis populations [18]–[20] which showed a predominance of Gram negative bacteria. Various genera found ubiquitously in the environment (water, soil and debris) were identified in these studies, including Acinetobacter, Serratia, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Flavimonas and Enterobacter. These bacteria have also been found associated with the gut of several other insects [21]–[24], suggesting they are a part of the natural or transient microbiota. Prior studies on guts and malpighian tubes from wild P. papatasi and P. tobbi showed a high incidence of mycoses which were similar to Aspergillus sclerotiorum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [25]. Various types of virus have also been found infecting phlebotomine sandflies [26], including Vesiculovirus [27]–[28] and Cytoplasmic Polyhedrosis Virus [29]. Furthermore, in addition to Leishmania, Trypanosoma, Endotrypanum and possibly other trypanosomatids [30], neotropical sandflies may harbour other parasites including microsporidians [31]–[32], gregarines [33]–[36], some Plasmodium spp. that parasitise lizards [37] and nematodes [38]–[41]. Nevertheless, there is little information on the pathological effects these parasites may produce in their sandfly hosts.

Metagenomics facilitates the culture-independent analysis of microbial communities [42], an approach which does not require prior assumptions about the composition of the target community. Metagenomic sequencing of communities containing eukaryotes, in particular protists, is mostly cost-prohibitive because of their enormous genome sizes and low gene coding densities [43]. Nevertheless, from an ecological perspective, excluding eukaryotes from a metagenomic analysis compromises the ability to assess the microbial community in its entirety. A possible approach to bypass the problem of large amounts of non-coding eukaryotic sequence data consists in obtaining molecular data at the RNA level. Given the recent VL outbreak in Argentina and with the ultimate goal of identifying possible biological control agents, this study used unbiased high-throughput pyrosequencing technology [44] to compare the diversity of the taxonomic groups associated with wild male and female adult Lu. longipalpis from endemic (Posadas, Misiones) and non-endemic (Lapinha Cave, Minas Gerais) VL locations in Argentina and Brazil, respectively. As in this study phlebotomine sandflies were considered environmental samples, the term “associated with” was used here in its broadest sense, referring to a wide variety of possible interactions ranging from casual associations due to random environmental contact (e.g., plant pathogenic fungi spores adhering to the hairy surface of the sandflies when sugar-feeding on plants) to closer pathogenic or symbiotic interactions (e.g., protists that parasitise phlebotomines or permanent gut microbiota, respectively). This analysis revealed the presence of sequences from bacteria, fungi, protists, plants and metazoans.

Methods

Field sampling and specimen preparation

Lu. longipalpis specimens from the non-endemic VL location, Lapinha Cave (Minas Gerais, Brazil), situated in the Sumidouro National Public Park, were kindly provided by Dr. Paulo Pimenta (Laboratory of Medical Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ). Sandflies from this location were chosen as reference because they have been extensively studied. Lu. longipalpis specimens from the endemic VL location, Posadas (Misiones, Argentina), where they occur in high density, were kindly provided by Dr. María Soledad Santini and Mr. Enrique Adolfo Sandoval (Research Network for Leishmaniasis in Argentina, REDILA, and Posadas Municipality Quality of Life Department).

Captures were made using CDC light traps [45] on the 15th and 26th of May 2009 in the Lapinha Cave and in Posadas, respectively. The Lapinha Cave (S19 33 42.42 W43 57 34.96) is a network of interconnected caves located in a vast tropical savanna ecoregion called cerrado, characterised by great plant and animal biodiversity. The trap was left 50–80 cm above ground level in an external small annex cave (2 mt long) where a chicken was kept to attract the sandflies and as a source of food (see Table 1 for a detailed description of the site). Posadas, the densely populated capital city of the province of Misiones, is located in the subtropical fields and grasslands ecoregion. In the Posadas area this ecoregion contacts the Paranaense forest and has a savanna-type landscape. The trap was installed in the peridomicile of a worst-case scenario homestead (domestic animals, dense vegetation, nearby spring) (S27 23.266 W55 53.403) (see Table 1 for a detailed description of the site).

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Table 1. Ecological description of the EVL (Posadas, Argentina) and NEVL (Lapinha Cave, Brazil) sampling site locations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001304.t001

Sandflies were transported alive in a nylon cage to the corresponding laboratories in Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais) and Posadas (Misiones) and no mortality was registered on arrival. Other insect species were captured together with the sandflies including hymenopterans, lepidopterans and mosquitoes. Sandflies were killed at low temperature, identified and separated according to sex, and stored alternatively in Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center Inc., Cincinnati, OH) or RNAlater® (Qiagen). A total of four groups of 100 sandflies each, two per location, were separated and named according to: SS1, females from the Endemic VL location (EVL females); SS2, EVL males; PP1, females from the Non-Endemic VL location (NEVL females); and PP2, NEVL males.

Results

The vast majority of reads obtained for each sample corresponded to Lu. longipalpis sequences (∼85%) and an important fraction showed no significant hits in the homology searches against the different databases (∼14%). Hits which corresponded to taxa other than Lu. longipalpis represented less than 0.2% of the total reads.

Results for each taxon were organised separately in this section. Figure 1 emphasises the treatment of these vectors as environmental samples. It shows an overview of the workflow used in this study, summarising and associating information on the sampling sites and on the taxa identified by sequence homology in each adult Lu. longipalpis sample. A detailed ecological description of both sampling sites is given in Table 1. Figure 2 integrates and summarises results for all the samples, indicating the taxa that were identified in each case, the species that were found for each taxon and the number of sequences for each species. Table S1 lists all the reads that showed significant hits and a brief description of each hit.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Figure 1. VL vectors as environmental samples: taxa identified in phlebotomine sandflies considering sampling site conditions.

This figure summarises and associates sampling site characteristics with taxa identified in male and female adult Lu. longipalpis from both locations. In all cases figures are only schematic and not an exact representation of either the sampling sites, phlebotomine sandflies or identified taxa. A) Shows the most significant ecological characteristics of both phlebotomine capture site locations in Argentina and Brazil: Posadas and Lapinha Cave, respectively. Only those animal species confirmed at the time of sampling were represented schematically (Table 1 includes a detailed list of animal and plant species in both locations). (B) Total RNA was extracted from male and female adult Lu. longipalpis specimens and amplified using sequence independent amplification (see Methods section). (C) Shows the different taxa identified by sequence homology in all four samples (bacteria, fungi, protists, metazoans and plants). Taxa are represented schematically and the particular species identified for each taxonomical group are not shown, except in the case of metazoans (see Figure 2 for a detailed list). Grey rectangular boxes group taxa found in female adult Lu. longipalpis. White rectangular boxes group taxa found in male adult Lu. longipalpis. VL: Visceral Leishmaniasis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001304.g001

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Figure 2. Taxa associated with wild adult male and female Lu. longipalpis specimens analysed in this study.

Results for all the samples were integrated and summarised in this figure, which indicates all the taxonomical groups that were identified, the species that were found for each taxon and the number of sequences for each species. Solid black lines group the different taxa (plants, protists, metazoans, bacteria and fungi). For bacteria, the dotted black lines separate and differentiate Gram+ and Gram- rods. The different species that were found are named beneath each column. The number of sequences for each species is indicated on the top part of each cylinder. SS1: adult females from the Endemic VL location (EVL); SS2: adult EVL males; PP1: adult females from the Non-Endemic VL location (NEVL); PP2: adult NEVL males.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001304.g002

Plants

A total of ten different plant species were identified in males and females from both locations, namely Elaeis guineensis, Capsicum annuum, Juglans hindsii, Artemisia annua, Brassica napus, Vitis vinifera, Solanum tuberosum, Nicotiana tabacum, Oryza sativa and Rhapidophyllum hystrix (Figures 1 and 2). All plant sequences were identified by homology to cDNA libraries (56 reads), except for R. hystrix which was identified by homology to rRNA genes (1 read) (Table S1). EVL males and females showed a greater number of species (5 and 6 species, respectively), followed by NEVL males (4 species) and lastly NEVL females (3 species) (Figure 2). However, these differences were significant (p<0.05) only between females from both locations (Table 2). EVL females showed the highest number of plant sequences (23 reads), followed by EVL and NEVL males (13 reads) and lastly NEVL females (8 reads) (Figure 2). The only case in which these differences were not significant (p<0.05) was between EVL females and NEVL males (Table 3).

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Table 2. Statistical analysis of the number of plant species between samples (Fisher's Exact Test; p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001304.t002

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Table 3. Statistical analysis of the number of plant sequences between samples (Fisher's Exact Test; p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001304.t003

C. annuum (bell pepper) was found in EVL males and females and in NEVL males. E. guineensis (African oil palm) was found in EVL females and NEVL males and females. S. tuberosum (potato) was found in EVL males and females and in NEVL females. J. hindsii (Northern California walnut) was found in EVL males and females and A. annua (sweet wormwood) was found in males from both locations. R. hystrix (needle palm) and B. napus (rapeseed) were only found in EVL females and V. vinifera (grapevine) was only found in EVL males. O. sativa (rice) was only found in NEVL females and N. tabacum (tobacco) was only found in NEVL males (Figure 2).

Discussion

This is the first study to survey taxa associated with an infectious disease vector applying an unbiased and comprehensive metagenomic approach. To ensure an unbiased description of the microbial community, the rationale chosen for this study included the extraction of total RNA and sequence-independent amplification. Total RNA was extracted from wild adult male and female Lu. longipalpis from an endemic (Posadas, Misiones) and a non-endemic (Lapinha Cave, Minas Gerais) VL location in Argentina and Brazil, respectively, and submitted to high-throughput pyrosequencing [44]. Given the high background level of vector sequences (∼85%), this approach proved to be very sensitive since it enabled the identification of taxa present in percentages up to 0.00036%. Moreover, as the different taxa were identified by homology to both rRNA and mRNA, the chosen approach was adequate for the objectives of this study.

The bacterial community identified in females from both locations and in NEVL males was distinct in every case. The only results in common with previous studies of gut microbiota from wild and laboratory reared female Lu. longipalpis and laboratory reared female P. duboscqi [18]–[20], [55], included the prevalence of Gram negative bacteria and the identification of A. baumanni, which in this study was found in NEVL males. Although previous reports established an essential basis for phlebotomine gut microbiota current knowledge, in these studies bacteria were identified using standard bacteriological methods. Consequently, those descriptions did not consider the remaining 99% of unculturable environmental microbes [56]. Hence the differences with this study, which applied a culture independent unbiased high-throughput approach that bypassed cloning of environmental DNA.

Interestingly and in accordance with results from this study, in previous reports the proportion of bacteria isolated from wild dipterans has been low. Studies on the midgut microbiota of wild mosquitoes, isolated bacteria from less than 50% of the specimens and the numbers of bacteria varied between individuals [57]–[58]. In a more recent study which used culture dependent and independent screening of field-collected Anopheles, bacteria were found in 15% of the mosquitoes, few of the mosquitoes harboured more than one bacterial species and only one species was found in more than one mosquito [23].

Only one bacterial type was found in EVL females (SS1), which corresponded to an unculturable bacterium originally isolated from cow faeces (Figure 2). Furthermore, a sequence match against RDP [52] indicated high similarity with Alistipes sp., a Gram negative anaerobic bacteria found in human faeces (Figure 2). Five bacterial species were found in NEVL females (PP1), four of which were Gram positive (Figure 2). Of these species, R. pickettii, A. flavithermus, G. kaustophilus and S. coelicolor, were originally isolated from contaminated lake sediment, waste water [59], deep-sea sediment [60] and soil [61], respectively. Interestingly, A. flavithermus and G. kaustophilus are thermophilic. Even though R. pickettii 12D was originally isolated from contaminated lake sediment, it is a ubiquitous microorganism found in water and soil [62] and is emerging as an opportunistic pathogen found in a wide variety of clinical samples [63]. P. acnes [64] is a universal inhabitant of human skin and is found at high population densities on the fat-rich areas of the face, scalp and upper trunk [65]. Four bacterial types were found in NEVL males (PP2), 50% of which were Gram negative (Figure 2). One of these bacterial types was the multidrug-resistant A. baumannii [66], which is recovered from natural environments and has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen worldwide [67]. Another of the bacterial types corresponded to uncultured Veillonella sp. isolated from human skin [68]. The other two bacteria were uncultured bacterial types originally recovered from environmental samples. In one case, BLASTN analysis indicated homology both to an uncultured bacterium from a water sample (Atlantic Ocean) and to Leifsonia xyli, a sugar-cane pathogen [69]. The other bacterial sequence corresponded to a proteobacterium clone isolated from wetland soil [70].

In summary, bacteria identified in this study are ubiquitous in the diverse environments these sandflies frequent (faeces, soil, water, sediment, plants, human skin) and which were present in both sampling sites (Figure 1, Table 1). Hence, possibly they were indicative of the behavioural patterns and feeding habits of these sandflies and are probably part of their transient microbiota. However, more in depth research is required to determine these interactions.

Four different species of fungi were found in NEVL Lu. longipalpis (PP2 and PP1), which differed between males and females (Figure 2). In previous reports for P. papatasi and P. tobbi, mycoses with a high incidence rate were found in the guts and malpighian tubes of wild specimens. Similar fungi cultured from guts of laboratory reared P. papatasi were identified as A. sclerotiorum and S. cerevisiae [25]. Microsporidians, which are highly pathogenic for some insects [71], have also been found parasitising neotropical sandflies [32], [72]. The two species identified in this study in NEVL females were P. conglomerata [73], a plant pathogen (mildew), and C. bertholletiae [74], a common soil fungus and a rare cause of zygomycosis in humans. On the other hand, the species found in NEVL males were M. verticillata [75], a genus commonly found in soil and a zygomycete which also causes zygomycosis in animals, and T. irritans [76], which belongs to a genus of foliar pathogens [77]. Given the very high vegetation density in the Lapinha Cave area (Figure 1, Table 1), a possible scenario is that plant pathogenic spores adhered to the sandflies' hairy surface during sugar-feeding on infected plants. This suggested Lu. longipalpis has a putative capacity of casual dispersal of plant pathogens, among others (see below). In conclusion, fungi identified in this study are found ubiquitously in the environments frequented by sandflies (plants and soil), which were abundant in the sampling site (Lapinha Cave), and so were probably indicative of their sugar-feeding habits and behavioural patterns.

Protist sequences were only found in EVL male and female specimens, of which the vast majority were found in males (Figure 2). Nearly 90% of the identified apicomplexans corresponded to coccidians (genera Cryptosporidium, Eimeria, Sarcocystis and Besnoitia, 88.7%) and the rest to gregarines (genera Ascogregarina and Psychodiella, 7%) and haemosporidians (Plasmodium spp., 4.3%). The absence of leishmanial sequences was not unexpected considering the rate of infection of sandflies with Leishmania is generally very low (0.01–1%) [78], even in endemic areas [5].

Gregarines have been reported in over 20 species of sandflies and Ascogregarina spp. have only been described in mosquitoes [79]. Given A. taiwanensis sequences were found in EVL males in this study, this could indicate that the parasite also infects Lu. longipalpis. Genus Psychodiella comprises 3 species with host specificity to phlebotomine sandflies: P. chagasi, P. saraviae and P. mackiei [35], [79]. In the New World, only P. chagasi and P. saraviae have been found parasitising Lutzomyia spp. and P. chagasi seems to infect a large range of neotropical species [33]–[36]. In this study, P. chagasi sequences were found in EVL males. The exact pathology caused by gregarines is unknown, but in Lu. longipalpis the parasite can reduce longevity and egg production and the level of parasitaemia can reach over 80% in laboratory colonies [80]. Notwithstanding, the use of P. chagasi as a control method in the field has not been considered efficient because the parasite seems to have a limited range and a minimal effect on sandfly biology under natural conditions [81]. The fact that in this study P. chagasi was found in randomly caught wild specimens, suggested it could be a more efficient control method under natural conditions than what was previously reported.

The free-living oocyst stage of coccidians is discharged by infected animals through their faeces. Sandflies are found around human habitations and breed in specific organic wastes, exploiting the accumulation of organic matter produced by domestic animals and poor sanitary conditions such as faeces, manure, rodent burrows and leaf litter [5]. Since the EVL sampling site (Posadas) was a worst case-scenario homestead which included dense vegetation, various domestic animals and abundant organic matter (Figure 1, Table 1), this could account for the presence of these parasites in EVL males and females. On the other hand, female sandflies suck blood from different animal species including humans, bovines, pigs, equines, dogs, opossums, birds, various rodents and reptiles [5], [82] and, additionally, some Plasmodium spp. that parasitise lizards have been found in sandflies [37]. In the field it is common to see lek-like aggregations of males and females assembled on or near hosts where blood feeding and mating occur [83]–[84]. This behaviour could account for the presence of haemosporidian sequences (blood borne parasites) in EVL males. Nevertheless, as these sequences were found only in males, this suggested males, and not females, would be the primary source of Plasmodium spp. Furthermore, P. falciparum was recently identified by PCR in faecal samples from gorillas [85] and considering the EVL sampling site had a significant amount of organic matter (Figure 1, Table 1), it is highly feasible that males acquired these microorganisms from human faeces. Alternatively, EVL males could have acquired these microorganisms by contact with other vectors bearing P. falciparum (i.e., Anopheles spp.) during transportation. In any case, these results suggest that, due to their behavioural patterns, Lu. longipalpis could be implicated in the casual dispersal of parasites of medical and veterinary importance.

Human sequences were found in males and females from both locations, whereas chicken sequences were found in NEVL females and EVL males and lizard sequences were only found in NEVL females (Figures 1 and 2). Lu. longipalpis is ubiquitous in dwellings where sanitary conditions are poor and domestic animals, such as dogs, chickens and pigs, are kept in and around the houses. In this kind of environment, the sandfly tends to congregate at outdoor sites, including animal sheds, where leks easily form on abundant, stationary hosts [7], [84]. In this context, as previously mentioned, the EVL location (Posadas) was a worst case-scenario homestead that kept dogs, chickens and a cat, had dense vegetation and a nearby spring (Figure 1, Table 1). In the NEVL location (Lapinha Cave), a chicken was kept to attract sandflies and as a source of food (Figure 1, Table 1). Furthermore, 35 species of lizards can be found in the Minas Gerais region [86]. As female sandflies blood feed on different animal species such as birds, reptiles and humans [5], [82], the presence of these sequences in females was not unexpected. Contrariwise, it was unexpected to find human and chicken sequences associated with males. Nonetheless, this could be due to their previously mentioned behavioural patterns of aggregation and courtship, where male sandflies are often seen over the host where they form leks, attracting females for a blood meal and increasing their chance for mating [83]–[84]. Alternatively, the trap itself was another area of close contact between male and female sandflies and with other potential vectors of medical importance. Consequently, males could have acquired these sequences by contact during transportation.

A total of ten different plant species were identified in males and females from both locations. Capsicum annuum (bell pepper), Elaeis guineensis (African oil palm) and Solanum tuberosum (potato) were identified in three of the four Lu. longipalpis samples. Juglans hindsii (Northern California walnut) was found in both EVL samples and Artemisia annua (sweet wormwood) was found in both male samples. Rhapidophyllum hystrix (needle palm) and Brassica napus (rapeseed) were only found in EVL females and Vitis vinifera (grapevine) was only found in EVL males. Oryza sativa (rice) and Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) were only found in NEVL females and males, respectively (Figure 2). As adults from both sexes feed on sugars from different plant sources [12], this diversity could be indicative of the different feeding preferences and/or food source availability. Moreover, as sugar meals are not composed primarily by cells, plant RNA could also have originated from other sources. Namely, pollen dispersed by wind could have adhered to the sandflies' hairy surface or, alternatively, these vectors could be casual pollinators during sugar-feeding.

For a more comprehensive understanding of these results, a few limitations of the chosen approach should be considered. In the first place, homology searches are circumscribed to the number and quality of sequences in the databases at the time of analysis. The relatively high number of sequences which showed no significant hits (∼14%) was a clear indication of this. Moreover, if the query corresponds to a given organism that has not yet been sequenced, the hit will probably coincide with the most related organism found in the database. Notwithstanding and given this situation, the results from the homology search will provide a close approximation to the real case-scenario. Another aspect is that, similarly to a previous study [48] and in order to obtain as much environmental data as possible, specimens were neither surface cleaned nor dissected to extract their guts. As they were not surface cleaned, some (or all) of the identified taxa could have been surface contaminants, acquired during transportation by contact with other captured species, i.e. hymenopterans, lepidopterans and mosquitoes, or during manipulation in the lab. In the latter case, even though samples were manipulated with extreme care, this was still a potential source of contamination. Nevertheless, if contamination occurred during manipulation, it was plausible to expect the same contaminating species in males and females from the same location (when specimens were identified and separated according to sex) or from both locations (when total RNA was extracted). The only species present in all four samples was Homo sapiens and, consequently, contamination during manipulation was a possibility for these reads. Notwithstanding, as some biological control agents act by surface contact, such as Beauveria bassiana [39], [87], and since the ultimate goal of this study was to identify possible biological control agents for this neglected infectious disease vector, had the specimens been surface cleaned, this information could have been lost together with other valuable environmental data. On the other hand, as the gut was not separated from the rest of the specimen and, consequently, they were not analysed independently, it was not possible to classify the observed taxa in putative surface contaminants and gut inhabitants, among others. Therefore, the possible role of putative permanent gut residents could not be inferred, such as influence on the insect development cycle or on the parasite transmission ability. Nevertheless, even a careful extraction process would not preclude the possibility of cross-contamination between the gut and the rest of the specimen and/or loss of information. In this sense, the chosen approach ensured that no data was lost and, notwithstanding the aforementioned limitations, enabled the identification of taxa that could putatively influence sandfly development and which have become the target of ongoing studies to determine their significance and location in the sandfly.

Finally, the diversity of bacterial, fungal, protist, plant and metazoan sequences found in this study in wild adult Lu. longipalpis from endemic and non-endemic locations, mostly confirmed their feeding habits and behavioural patterns. Nevertheless, it also suggested that these vectors could possibly be a chance source of dispersal of various animal and plant diseases, such as coccidiosis and malaria. This is particularly significant since the geographical distribution of this vector is undoubtedly expanding [7]. The fact that RNA was obtained from these animal and plant pathogens would indicate that they were biologically active, but this cannot be determined with the present results and further studies must be performed to establish the significance of these findings. The identification of gregarines in wild Lu. longipalpis specimens could indicate that these parasites are a more efficient control method under natural conditions than what was previously suggested [81]. This is specially meaningful as studies on biological control of phlebotomines are still scarce and its practical application seems to be limited to the adult VL vector stage [16]. The employment of biolarvicides in the field is difficult due to the diversity of habitats in which this vector can reproduce and evidence that Lu. longipalpis larvae appear to be thinly dispersed and not concentrated in any particular microhabitat [17]. Nevertheless, as the number of samples analysed in this study was limited, a greater number of specimens must be studied to establish the significance of these results. Current studies are underway to analyse the presence and establish the significance of the taxa found in this study in a greater number of adult male and female Lu. longipalpis samples from endemic and non-endemic locations. A particular emphasis is being given to those taxa implicated in the biological control of this vector and to the etiologic agents of animal and plant diseases.

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the Research Network for Leishmaniasis in Argentina (Red de Investigación de Leishmaniasis en Argentina, REDILA), the Posadas Municipality Quality of Life Department (Secretaría de Calidad de Vida, Municipalidad de Posadas) and the dedicated assistance of Dr. Ma. Soledad Santini and Mr. Enrique Adolfo Sandoval who captured, identified and separated the wild male and female Lu. longipalpis specimens from Posadas and provided detailed information on the capture location. We gratefully acknowledge the Laboratory of Medical Entomology of Dr. Paulo Pimenta from the Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, for capturing, identifying and separating the wild male and female Lu. longipalpis samples from Lapinha Cave and for providing detailed information on the capture location. We also thank an anonymous reviewer for very helpful suggestions, corrections and comments on a previous draft of the manuscript.

CBM, LAD and RVRP are members of the CONICET research career (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina).