Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionMay 1, 2020 |
|---|
|
Dear Dr. Liu, Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Validation study of HLA-B*13:01 as a biomarker of dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome in leprosy patients in Indonesia" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations. Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following: [1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out [2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file). Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments. Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Johan Van Weyenbergh Associate Editor PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases Ana LTO Nascimento Deputy Editor PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases *********************** Reviewer's Responses Reviewer #2: The paper “Validation study of HLA-B*13:01 as a biomarker of dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome in leprosy patients in Indonesia” Krismawat et al evaluates the allele HLA-B*13:01 association with dapsone hypersensitivity among Indonesians. This data is not original but an important replication of previously described among Chinese Thai and other populations. The paper is well written and aims are correctly addressed. The sample size is small but due to the high odds ratios expected, calculations supported the numbers with good power estimations. The genotyping methods for HLA results were performed adequately and logistic regression is the best analysis approach to test association. Reviewer #2: The findings are important and deserve publication. The results are very clear and provides good evidence to screen the Indonesian population prior to dapsone treatment avoiding life-threatening conditions for leprosy patients. Reviewer #2: Authors must discuss a little better the introduction of this screening as a policy and a great improvement would be cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate impact in incidence and mortality. Indeed, a recent publication listed by authors performed a good prospective study and authors cited as “Screening for this allele in new leprosy patients before the initiation of MDT has proven beneficial to reduce incidence rate of DHS in China to zero”. Authors should consider follow up and complementary to this previous analysis, with cost-effectiveness analysis. -------------------- Reviewer #1: Major and general comments: This is an important area and there are potentially interesting findings here in order to draw appropriate conclusions from the data the analysis should be redone and that much more of the actual data including the causality assessment and functional data should be included for the readers (supplement). In terms of the analysis at a minimum this should include matching cases to age,sex, race and match for underlying disease state and co-morbidities and conditional logistical analyses. functional data and matched analysis would be enormously helpful to clean this up so conclusions can be drawn from the data. With regards to previous study showing an association between HLA-B*13:01 has been described in association with co-trimoxazole-induced DRESS (PMID: 32452529), do you have cases or control using co-trimoxazole? It should be discussed cross reactivity between Dapsone and co-trimoxazole. The previous study showed that HLA-B*13:01 was the predictive markers for both DRESS and SJS-TEN. In this study the authors should reanalyze to confirm the phenomenon. As too many HLA-B genotypes were discovered and compared, the p-value should be corrected by Bonferroni correction. Table 1 showed and compared alleles frequency of HLA-B genotype. As we known that carry only one allele can be the risk individual, the number of carrier should be expressed and analyzed. The general population from the same race should be recruited and genotyped to compare and it can help to extrapolate for screening in clinical implementations. HWE was less than 0.05, the authors should describe and discuss. The clinical characteristics for cases-controls should be draw out. Recently, the underlying condition such as renal function can determine the risk of drug-induced SCARs such as allopurinol. Dose can also the risk factors. The authors should reanalyze the non-genetics risk factors. The authors should show number need to test to determine how many patients would be needed to screen to identify one patient likely to go onto DHS. Please check through the manuscript for genetic format, it should be italic form. The first paragraph of Introduction (line 62-65), second paragraph (line 75-78) need reference. As the authors mentioned that the leprosy patients got multi-drug treatment, how can the culprit Dapsone as drug-induced hypersensitivity, the Elispot and LTT should be performed to confirm the DHS. What is the criteria to define DHS. The causality assessment should be performed and express in table format. -------------------- Figure Files: While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Data Requirements: Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5. Reproducibility: To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods |
| Revision 1 |
|
Dear Dr. Liu, We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Validation study of HLA-B*13:01 as a biomarker of dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome in leprosy patients in Indonesia' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests. Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated. IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS. Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Best regards, Johan Van Weyenbergh Associate Editor PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases Ana LTO Nascimento Deputy Editor PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases *********************************************************** |
| Formally Accepted |
|
Dear Dr. Liu, We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Validation study of HLA-B*13:01 as a biomarker of dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome in leprosy patients in Indonesia," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication. The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly. Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers. Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Best regards, Shaden Kamhawi co-Editor-in-Chief PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases Paul Brindley co-Editor-in-Chief PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .