Table 1.
Type of area, trapping site, sampling year and Orthohantavirus andesense seroprevalence.
Fig 1.
Small mammal trapping sites sampled in protected areas (PA, in green) and unprotected areas (UPA, in red) across Chilean ecoregions.
Vertical lines indicate the approximate distribution of major eco-regions (Mediterranean, Valdivian rain forests, Patagonian rain forests, Magellanic subpolar forests). Map created with Datawrapper.
Fig 2.
Comparison of relative abundance of Oligoryzomys longicaudatus (A) and relative seropositivity (B) between protected areas (PA) in green and unprotected areas (UPA) in red.
Fig 3.
Comparison of overall Shannon-Wiener indexes (A), Simpson indexes (B), Richness (C) and Evenness (D) between protected areas (PA) in green and unprotected areas (UPA) in red.
Fig 4.
Comparison of the small mammal community’s composition using the analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) between protected areas (PA) and unprotected areas (UPA).
Fig 5.
Rényi diversity profiles for Protected Areas (PA) in green and Unprotected Areas (UPA) in red.
At lower alpha values, diversity is more influenced by species evenness, whereas higher alpha values emphasize the contribution of dominant species to overall diversity.