Fig 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews flow diagram [35]. The figure details how 16 studies were included from the original number of 4,404 studies found after the search. After one hundred and twenty eight (128) duplicates were removed, titles and abstracts were screened. This led to the exclusion of 4,254 studies. Full text screening was done for the remaining 22 and six more were excluded because four of the studies had outcomes different from our study criteria while the design for the remaining two studies were not eligible for our selection.
Fig 2.
Number of publications biennially.
This figure details the frequency of publications on our research topic in a two-year range.
Table 1.
Characteristics of articles selected for Scoping Review of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices among Abattoir Workers in Low-Middle Income countries.
Table 2.
Knowledge, attitudes and practices from included studies.
Fig 3.
The conceptual framework shows the interplay between individual-level factors (knowledge, attitudes and practices), cultural influences, and institutional enablers or constraints. The framework offers a multi-level perspective on how zoonotic disease prevention behaviours is shaped in abattoir contexts. It also shows how knowledge, attitudes and practices relate to one another depicted as ‘inclusive’, ‘translate’ or ‘does not translate’.