Table 1.
District archetype average and 95% confidence interval of sub-district prevalence.
Fig 1.
Total cost of testing a district using traditional sampling: CAA RDT, Kato-Katz, Urine filtration, Kato-Katz and Urine-filtration, and M&E: Kato-Katz and Urine filtration, by cost category.
The total cost corresponding to the y-axis is in the circle. M&E: monitoring and evaluation.
Fig 2.
Total cost to test a district by testing methodology and sampling strategy.
Points represent the expected cost to test a district, while error bars represent minimum and maximum district costs. Labeled costs are the cost per school-age child sampled under the given strategy and test based on the expected district cost. UF: urine filtration, KK: Kato-Katz, M&E: monitoring and evaluation.
Fig 3.
Test specifications that led to the correct treatment classification for at least 80% of sub-districts by district archetype and sampling strategy: A) SPPA, B) Traditional.
Fig 4.
Percent of sub-districts that were classified for overtreatment (A) or undertreatment (B), by sampling strategy (color: red-traditional, blue-SPPA), test sensitivity, and specificity (shape: hollow-95%, solid-100%).
Table 2.
Cost and percent of correctly treated sub-districts by sampling strategy and test technology.