Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Panel A. S. haematobium eggs in a urine sediment sample (10x ocular; 10x objective lens). Panel B. S. haematobium egg in a urine sediment sample (10x ocular; 40x objective lens).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Representative scheme of sample visualization, image acquisition, image pre-processing, and image annotation procedures.

Sample/slide, image, annotated image, and label are represented. Schistosoma haematobium digital images were acquired with an integrated camera/smartphone camera in the Microbiology Laboratory of the Vall d’Hebron Drassanes International Health and Infectious Diseases Centre. Illustrations were obtained from open source resources.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of the urine sediment sample image database.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of Convolutional Neural Network training and performance parameters with the test image dataset.

DA: Data augmentation, mAP: mean average precision, YOLO: you only look once.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Graphical representation of F-score/mAP0.5 of the different CNNs trained on the test dataset.

Orange dots represent the performance of CNNs trained with the 491-image dataset. Blue dots represent the performance of CNNs trained with the 1017-image dataset.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Panel A. Digital image (400x) of a urine sediment sample with hematuria and leukocyturia and three Schistosoma haematobium eggs detected with the YOLOv5x trained model. Panel B. Digital image (100x) of a urine sediment sample with three S. haematobium eggs detected with the YOLOv5x trained model.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of binary image classifier training and performance parameters on validation and test image datasets.

More »

Table 3 Expand