Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

A flow diagram depicting basic experimental framework for the trap experiments.

Figure created using biorender.com (www.biorender.com [accessed 01/02/24]).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

An example of an Nzi trap with trap cage at the apex (A) and detail of a Glossina sp. captured within the trap cage (B).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Trypanosome detection primers used in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Box-and-whisker plots showing Cq value data from T. brucei (A) multi-copy target TBR-qPCR screening and (B) single-copy target PLC-qPCR screening of infected flies (IF) and naïve (UF) across four trap types (T1-T3, C0). C0 A+B were placed within close proximity (< 1 metre) of experiments (T1-3), C0 C was placed in a separate room. This was to test localised airborne DNA contamination. Crosses represent the mean Cq values. Grey bars display proportion of samples recording amplification using respective qPCR assays.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Plots displaying Cq values for field-caught flies.

(A) shows TBR-qPCR Cq values (circular, black symbol) for all field flies where DNA was available (n = 640). (B) shows PLC-qPCR Cq values (triangular, red symbol) for a subset of field flies with TBR-qPCR Cq <22.13 and where DNA was available (n = 45). (C) shows comparison of TBR-qPCR Cq values from female (circular symbol, n = 428) and male (diamond symbol, n = 212) in field-caught flies. There was no significant difference in median TBR-qPCR Cq values from females (median = 26.22) and males (median = 25.97, p = 0.5336). For all plots (A, B, C) grey boxplot shows median and 1–99% percentiles, error bars display range. The red dotted horizontal lines represent the Cq cut offs of 22.13 for TBR (A, C) and 25.36 for PLC (B).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

A table detailing sex, transect and TBR-PCR positive results breakdown of field-caught tsetse by species (Glossina sp.).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

A table displaying calculations of Cq cut-offs based on TBR-qPCR and PLC-qPCR screening of 45 infected flies (IFs), confirmed as midgut infection-positive by microscopy.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Catches where >95% of trapped flies were collected and screened and total catch >1 (n = 19). Arranged in order of proportion of TBR +ve flies (L-R, largest to smallest).

(A) shows TBR-qPCR Cq values (circular, black symbol) for each fly sample in each catch. (B) shows PLC-qPCR Cq values (triangular, red symbol) for each fly sample in each catch that also had a TBR-qPCR Cq value <22.13 and had DNA available. Grey bars (right axes) represent the proportion (%) of flies in each catch testing TBR-PCR positive. The red dotted horizontal lines represent the Cq cut offs of 22.13 for TBR (A) and 25.36 for PLC (B).

More »

Fig 5 Expand