Fig 1.
Cytological markers differentiate metacyclic promastigote from amastigote stage Leishmania major.
Comparison of marker expression on metacyclic promastigotes (left) or parasites 72 hours post infection of PEMs (i.e. amastigotes, right). (i) Parasite nuclei are detected with antisera against L. major histone proteins (green), and PFR is shown in red. (ii) Parasite histones, red. mAB T17, green. (iii) Parasite histones, red. mAB T18, green. (iv) YFP fluorescence (yellow) overlaid onto DIC image. Scale bar represents 5 μm.
Fig 2.
Timing of developmental changes associated with amastigote differentiation in PEMs.
(A) Parasite flagella were identified at different time points following infection of PEMs with anti-LPG (≤ 8 h post infection) or mAb T17 at longer time points. The fraction of parasites retaining long flagella (≥ 5 μm; arrows) was determined at the indicated time points and plotted in (B). Scale bar represents 5 μm. N > 100 parasites analyzed per time point. (C) Quantitative analysis of parasite flagellar length of metacyclics or parasites at the indicated time points post infection of PEMs. Each data point represents one parasite. (D) The kinetics of L. major metacyclic-stage parasites acquiring amastigote-like shape characteristics. Metacyclic-stage parasites, parasites at the indicated time points post infection of PEMs, or amastigotes from infected mouse footpad tissue 2 weeks post infection were stained to detect the parasite cell body and imaged by confocal microscopy. Image analysis was then performed to determine the length and width of each parasite, with cell shape determined as the ratio between parasite length and width. Metacyclic parasites and parasites within PEMs were stained with anti-LPG (time points ≤ 8 h or mAb T18 (time points > 8 h). Tissue amastigotes were detected by YFP fluorescence. N > 50 parasites. (E) Confocal micrograph of BrdU-labeled parasites. PEMs were infected with metacyclic-stage L. major for 72 h in the presence of 0.1 mM BrdU prior to fixation and immunolabeling to detect BrdU (green) and Leishmania histones (red). Arrows indicate parasite nuclei showing BrdU-labeling. Arrowhead, BrdU-negative parasite nucleus. Boxed region is magnified in the images on the right. k, BrdU-positive kinetoplast. Scale bar, 5 μm. (F) The percentage of parasites showing an “amastigote-like” phenotype for the various markers is plotted as a function of time after infection of PEMs. N > 200 parasites analyzed per marker per time point. (G) Schematic summary of the data in (F) showing the timing of amastigote development culminating in new DNA synthesis. Data, means ± S.E.M for 3 independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001 by ANOVA.
Fig 3.
Metacyclic-to-amastigote transition is similar in different host cell types.
(A-D) Comparison of metacyclic-to-amastigote transition in PEM (black diamonds), BMM (gray squares) and BMDC (open triangles) for the percent of parasites positive for PFR labeling (A), mAb T18 labeling (B), YFP signal (C), and mAb T17 labeling (D). (E) Comparison of parasite cell shape 24 h after infection of the indicated cell types with metacyclic-stage L. major. Data, means ± S.E.M for 3 independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001 by ANOVA; N.S., not significant. N > 350 parasites per marker/time point.
Fig 4.
Initiation of parasite replication delayed in bone-marrow derived macrophages and DC.
(A) PEM, BMM, and BMDC were infected with metacyclic-stage parasites and cultured in the presence of BrdU for the indicated time points prior to fixation. The percent of parasites showing BrdU-positive nuclei was determined by analysis of samples stained with anti-BrdU and anti-L. major histone antibodies. N > 350 parasites per cell type/time point. (B) The number of parasites per 100 host cells at 24 and 72 h post infection of PEM, BMM, and BMDC. Data, mean ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.001 by ANOVA. N.S., not significant.
Fig 5.
Retention of LPG expression following infection of BMMs and BMDCs.
(A) Anti-LPG fluorescence intensity on a per-parasite basis. Anti-LPG intensity of WT metacyclic-stage parasites as well as at various time points after infection of PEMs was measured as described in Methods. As a negative control, the anti-LPG intensity of L. major lpg1- (open circles) was measured 0.3 hr after infection of PEMs. The gray line shows the mean anti-LPG intensity of ‘LPG-negative’ WT parasites plus two standard deviations, and any parasite with anti-LPG values below that line would be considered “LPG-negative”. Black bars represent geometric mean of the data for each sample. Data shown is pooled from at least two independent experiments. ***, P < 0.0001 compared to the values for metacyclics using ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc analysis. (B) Representative images comparing the LPG-positivity of purified metacyclics and parasites within PEMs, DCs, and BMMs at 72 hours post-infection. Parasite nuclei are shown in green, LPG is shown in red. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (C) Percent of parasites within the three host cell types that are LPG+ as determined by the ‘qualitative’ assay. PEM data, black diamonds, BMM data, gray squares, DC data, open triangles. N > 200 parasites per time point/cell type. (D) Quantitation of LPG on the surface of parasites within PEMs, BMMs, and DCs at 24 and 72 hours post infection. For comparison, anti-LPG intensity data for metacyclic-stage parasites is also shown. The gray line shows the cut-off for LPG-positivity. Black bars represent geometric mean of the data for each sample. n ≥ 3 experiments. N.S, not significant, *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001; ***, P < 0.0001 (ANOVA).
Fig 6.
LPG-retaining parasites within DCs 72 hours post-infection have not undergone DNA synthesis.
(A, B) Parasites were cultured in the presence of thymidine analogue (EdU) for 72 hours following infection of BMDC. Cells were stained to detect EdU-incorporation (green), LPG (red) and parasite nuclei (blue). (A) Representative image of parasites within DCs stained as above. Arrows, parasites showing LPG-positivity. Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) Percent of parasites within DCs 72 hours post-infection that are positive for EdU-incorporation. Data shown include the percent of total parasites that are EdU+, as well as the EdU-positivity of parasites that are either LPG-negative or LPG-positive. Data, means ± S.E., n = 3 experiments, ****, P < 0.0001 (Chi-square; N = 1185 parasites). (C) Comparison of L. major amastigogenesis marker transitions, LPG loss, and cell cycle re-entry following infection of PEM, BMM, and BMDC. Overall, the acquisition of early amastigote characteristics is the same in the three host cell types, but LPG loss and DNA replication are reduced or substantially delayed following infection of BMM and BMDC.
Fig 7.
Localization of T17 antibody labeling in amastigotes.
(A) Epifluorescent microscopy of an amastigote (72 h post metacyclic infection) within a PEM labeled with T17 antibody along with antibodies recognizing parasite histones and DNA stain Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Electron micrograph of an L. major amastigote within a PEM following immuno-gold labeling with T17 antibody. Scale bar, 0.5 μm. Arrowhead indicates concentration of T17 immuno-labeling at the distal tip of the amastigote flagellum. (C) T17 immuno-labeling around the perimeter of the parasite flagellum. Scale bar, 0.5 μm. (D) T17 immuno-labeling is concentrated at the phagolysosome-parasite flagellum contact site, with some signal on the host cell-side of the phagolysosome. Scale bar, 0.5 μm. (E) Confocal micrograph of PEM 3 d after L. major or mock infection. Samples were stained with T17, antibodies reactive to Leishmania histones, and a DNA stain. Zoomed in images of the boxed regions are shown to the right. Scale bar, 10 μm. (F) ImmunoEM labeling with T17 of vesicular structures in L. major-infected PEM. Images from three different cells shown. Arrows indicate membranous structures containing the parasite antigen recognized by T17 within the PEM cytoplasm. Scale bar, 0.5 μm. Abbreviations: p, parasite posterior; n, nucleus; k, kinetoplast; pf, parasite flagellum.
Fig 8.
Localization of T18 antibody labeling.
(A) Epifluorescent microscopy of an amastigote (72 h post metacyclic infection) within a PEM labeled with T18 antibody along with antibodies recognizing parasite histones and DNA stain Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 2 μm. (B, C) Electron micrograph of an L. major amastigote within a PEM following immuno-gold labeling with T18 antibody. The region within the dashed box (left) is shown to the right at higher magnification in panel C. (D, E) Additional examples of the posterior end of T18 immuno-gold-labeled parasites. (F) TEM image of the posterior end of an L. major amastigote. These cells were subjected to a different fixation protocol than what was used for immunoEM (see Methods). Arrowheads in panels C-F point to the amastigote-specific structure at the posterior end of the parasite. Scale bar for EM images, 0.5 μm. Abbreviations: p, parasite posterior; n, nucleus; k, kinetoplast.