Fig 1.
Lifecycle of Fasciola hepatica, reproduced with permission from DpDx CDC Fasciola spp. lifecycle [14].
Table 1.
Children demographic characteristics in Fasciola positive and negative households.
Table 2.
“Distribution of the livestock samples and comparison between Fasciola positive and negative samples “.
Table 3.
“Median distances from Fasciola positive or negative households to closest positive or negative livestock feces sample”.
Table 4.
“Multivariable logistic regression modeling factors assessing the likelihood of household positivity status by proximity to different types of livestock feces under different distance radius”.
Fig 2.
“Outlier and Cluster Analysis map based on Anselin Local Moran’s I statistic of all livestock and human Fascioliasis in the Anta province of Cusco, Peru” [21].
(A) Map based on infected and uninfected livestock and household infection status. (B) Map based on infected and uninfected livestock feces (cattle, sheep, swine). (C) Inset showing the location of the study area (maroon dot) in the Cusco region of Peru. This map was created using ArcGIS v. 10.7.1 (ESRI, 2019). https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=67372ff42cd145319639a99152b15bc3.
Fig 3.
“Significant hot/cold spot analysis of livestock and human fascioliasis in the Anta province of Cusco, Peru” [18].
(A) Map based on infected and uninfected livestock feces and household infection status. (B) Map based on infected and uninfected livestock feces (cattle, sheep, swine). (C) Inset showing the location of the study area (maroon dot) in the Cusco region of Peru. This map was created using ArcGIS v. 10.7.1 (ESRI, 2019). https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f33a34de3a294590ab48f246e99958c9.