Table 1.
Type of response and the corresponding dengue control activities.
Fig 1.
Time-series of weekly number of houses covered with larval control against the probability of outbreaks at before and after the alarm signals (week 28), in outbreak districts.
Fig 2.
Time-series of weekly number of houses covered with larval control against the probability of outbreaks at before and after the alarm signals (week 28), in non-outbreak districts.
Fig 3.
Segmented time-series of household coverage % with larval control at baseline (pre-alarm signal period), at the week (28) of alarm signal and post-alarm signal period.
One example of outbreak districts is presented. (San Nicolas).
Fig 4.
Segmented time-series of household coverage % with larval control at baseline (pre-alarm signal period), at the week (28) of alarm signal and post-alarm signal period.
One example of non-outbreak districts is presented. (Coatzacoalcos).
Fig 5.
The outbreak predictions as generated by the EWARS for the outbreak districts.
The endemic channel is presented by the shaded area in grey which includes + z* SD of the moving average; the alarm threshold is represented by the dotted horizontal line; the outbreak probability (“alarm line”) estimated by the EWS is represented by the green line; the weekly dengue incidence rates is represented by the red line.
Fig 6.
The outbreak predictions as generated by the EWARS for the non-outbreak districts.
The endemic channel is presented by the shaded area in grey which includes + z* SD of the moving average; the alarm threshold is represented by the dotted horizontal line; the outbreak probability (“alarm line”) estimated by the EWS is represented by the green line; the weekly dengue incidence rates is represented by the red line.
Table 2.
Mix-effect linear regression and GEE of the association between the intensity of different types of vector control and outbreak/non-outbreak groups.
Table 3.
Percent of households before and after alarm signals and rate of change between periods in 2 outbreak and 9 non-outbreak districts with alarm signals.
Table 4.
Intensity of entomological studies.
Household coverage (per 1000) before and after alarm signals and rate of change between periods in 2 outbreak and 9 non-outbreak districts with alarm signals.
Table 5.
Intensity of indoor spraying around case households (perifocal spraying).
Percent of households treated before and after alarm signals and rate of change between periods in 2 outbreak and 9 non-outbreak districts with alarm signals.
Table 6.
Intensity of indoor spraying before and after the alarm signal across two outbreak-districts and nine non-outbreak districts with alarm signals with the rate of change (from before to after alarm period).