Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Manifestations related to CanL defined to evaluate the clinical scores of dogs.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Consort flow diagram showing the therapeutic protocols and dogs with leishmaniasis in each stage of the study.

Over all the 42 dogs included at D+0, one dog from the Group 2 was lost to follow-up before the D+30 time point. During the 6-month follow-up, four dogs from Group 1 were lost to follow-up two months after the beginning of treatment, and two of these were due to failure of clients to return for the final revisits on D+90 and D+180. Two others were because of death not related to CanL. In addition, six dogs died in the period between D+60 after the beginning of treatment and before the D+90 visit with increase in clinical signs related to CanL. Four of these were in Group 1, and two were in Group 2.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of dogs assigned to each treatment arm and homogeneity analysis data, expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and frequencies (%).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Time course of total clinical score (Kruskal-Wallis test).

Clinical scores (mean ± SD) of the dogs (n = 42) were assessed by veterinarians at the time of scheduled visits at D0, D+30, D+90 and D+180. A. All treated groups. B. Glucantime/Allopurinol-treated group. C. Artesunate-treated group.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of the mean percent reduction in clinical score between groups (Mann-Whitney test); A. Day 30 posttreatment; B. Day 90 posttreatment; C. Day 180 posttreatment. Mortality was taken into consideration (mortality score = 22). The mean percent reduction in clinical score is higher in the artesunate-treated group than in the Glucantime/allopurinol-treated group at all time points.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Individual clinical changes in dogs over time.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Individual change in parasite load, number of parasites per mL of blood and percentage reduction over time.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Serology monitoring.

Antibody titers (mean ± SD) of the dogs (n = 42) were assessed by quantitative IFAT at the time of scheduled visits at D0, D+30, D+90 and D+180 (Kruskal-Wallis test/bilateral). A. All dogs. B. Glucantime/allopurinol group. C. Artesunate group.

More »

Fig 4 Expand