Fig 1.
Interpolated Kernel density of occurrence records.
(A) Humans 2017. (B) Monkeys 2017. (C) Humans 2018. (D) Monkeys 2018.
Fig 2.
Spatial aggregation (significant Anselin Morans I test) of records.
(A) Humans 2017, (B) Monkeys 2017, (C) Monkeys 2018. Empty circle: non-significant aggregation. Red: positive aggregation. Yellow: high aggregation in a region with low aggregation. Blue: low aggregation in a region with high aggregation.
Table 1.
Contribution of environmental variables to YF occurrence, based on human and monkey cases in 2017 and 2018, Brazil.
Fig 3.
Interpolated and extrapolated geographic projections based on human records in 2017.
Interpolated (A) and extrapolated (B) geographic projections of more suitable conditions for YF occurrence, based on 2017 human records.
Fig 4.
Interpolated and extrapolated geographic projections based on monkey records in 2017.
Interpolated (A) and extrapolated (B) geographic projections of more suitable conditions for YF occurrence, based on 2017 monkey records.
Fig 5.
Interpolated and extrapolated geographic projections based on human records in 2018.
Interpolated (A) and extrapolated (B) geographic projections of more suitable conditions for YF occurrence, based on 2018 human records.
Fig 6.
Interpolated and extrapolated geographic projections based on monkey records in 2018.
Interpolated (A) and extrapolated (B) geographic projections of more suitable conditions for YF occurrence, based on monkey 2018 records.
Fig 7.
(A). At-risk index (favorability value) at deciles, for the 2017 and 2018 periods, humans and monkeys. (B). The number of geographic units (1 sq km) at different at-risk index, for the 2017 and 2018 periods, humans and monkeys.