Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Specificity and affinity of Affimer-NP.

(A) Western blot analysis of a pull-down experiment using Affimers as capture molecules and CCHFV NP as target. (B) Western blot analysis of a pull-down experiment using either HAZV or CCHFV NP as target. (C, D) SPR analysis of binding between Affimers and ten-fold dilutions of CCHFV (C) or HAZV NP (D).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

CD analyses of Affimer-NP, CCHFV NP and Affimer-NP/CCHFV NP complex.

(A, B, C) Curves representing ellipticity across the far UV spectra of CCHFV NP (A), Affimer-NP (B) or a 1:1 mixture of both (C) at 20ºC-90ºC. Crystal structure of Affimer scaffold (PDB:4n6u) is represented in orange and CCHFV NP (PDB:4akl) in blue. (D, E, F) Curves representing folded/unfolded fractions and melting temperatures (Tm) of Affimer-NP (D), CCHFV NP (E) and their mixture (F).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Inhibitory effects of Affimer-NP.

(A, B) FA analysis of RNA-binding interference of Affimer-NP using 27mer (A) or 48mer (B) RNA molecules. Top-right graphs represent negative control experiments using Affimer-Myo. (C) IncuCyte pictures taken 72h post-co-transfection of CCHFV mini-genome components plus 750 ng of Affimer-NP-RFP, Affimer-YS-RFP or no Affimer (C-). GFP signal corresponds to CCHFV-specific gene expression and RFP signal corresponds to Affimers-RFP. Scale bar = 300 μm. (D) GFP reporter signal 72h post-co-transfection of CCHFV mini-genome components with 750 ng of Affimer-NP, Affimer-YS or no Affimer (C-). (E) GFP and RFP signal 72h post-co-transfection of CCHFV mini-genome components with different amounts of Affimer-NP-RFP. Data are presented as mean ±SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test (ns = non-significant, *** = p<0.001).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Tertiary structure of Affimer-NP/CCHFV NP complex.

(A) Crystal structure of CCHFV NP (PDB:4akl). Residues involved in RNA-binding, monomer-monomer interactions, or both are highlighted in blue, pink and purple, respectively. (B) Crystal structure of Affimer-NP (represented in orange) bound to CCHFV NP. (C) Close-up of Affimer-NP/CCHFV NP interaction. (D) Alignment of CCHFV NP (residues 329–407, PDB:4akl) and HAZV NP (PDB:4xze). NP residues comprising the Affimer-NP variable loop contacts are highlighted in orange, when conserved in both CCHFV and HAZV NPs, or in cyan if not. (E) Close-up of CCHFV NP residues involved in the interaction with Affimer-NP loops. Non-conserved residues (cyan) are labeled.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Sandwich ELISA for the detection of CCHFV NP.

(A) Affimer-NP was used as capture molecule for CCHFV NP in spiked sera. Anti-CCHFV NP IgGs were used as detection molecule. Anti-rabbit goat polyclonal IgGs labelled with HRP were used to develop the colorimetric output using TMB as substrate. (B, C, D, E, F) ELISA results testing sera from animals (B-E) or human (F) spiked with CCHFV, HAZV, SBV or RVFV NPs.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Development of a LFA for the detection of CCHFV NP using Affimer-NP as detection molecule.

(A, B) Schematic of the LFA. Affimer-NP was used as detection molecule on the membrane of the LFA strip and anti-CCHFV NP polyclonal rabbit IgGs were used as capture antibody for the coating of red latex beads. Control anti-biotin mouse IgGs were used for the control line in the membrane together with biotin-BSA for the coating of blue latex beads. If a CCHFV NP spiked sample (A) is applied to the strip, the CCHFV NP binds to the antibody in the red beads and it is subsequently captured by the Affimer-NP in the membrane, resulting in a red test line. In the case of a negative sample (B), there is no CCHFV NP present and the red latex beads migrate until the end of the strip, resulting in an uncolored test line. In both cases, the BSA-biotin coated blue latex beads bind to the anti-biotin mouse IgG on the membrane, resulting in a blue control line.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Affimer-NP based LFA results and comparison with ELISA.

(A) LFA positive line intensity measured after applying animal sera spiked with CCHFV, HAZV or SBV NP (120 ng NP/strip). (B) Histogram representation of data in (A). (C) LFAs 10 min after application of horse sera samples spiked with CCHFV, HAZV, SBV or RVFV NP. (D) Comparison of performance between ELISA and LFAs using horse sera spiked with CCHFV NP. Primary axes correspond to LFAs and secondary axes to ELISA. Limits of detection are highlighted with an asterisk.

More »

Fig 7 Expand