Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Patient flow chart and classification of patients.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of cases with a proven infectious etiology.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The number or percentage of activated neutrophils (Neut-RI), lymphocytes (Re-Lymph and AS-Lymph), and monocytes (Re-Mono) in patients with a proven infection.

The lines indicate median with interquartile ranges. Differences were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test with post-hoc tests. The lines indicate a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) considering correction of the P value for multiple testing (Benjamini-Hochberg). WBC, white blood cells.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The absolute number or percentage of activated neutrophils (Neut-RI), lymphocytes (Re-Lymph and AS-Lymph) and monocytes (Re-Mono) in patients with proven or proven/probable infections, aggregated in bacterial or arboviral infections.

The lines indicate median with interquartile ranges. Differences were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test with post-hoc tests. WBC, white blood cells.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

IMS Classification in proven cases and in combined proven/probable cases.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) concentrations.

(A) enrolled patients with a proven infection aggregated per infection; (B) enrolled patients with a proven or probable infection aggregated in bacterial or arboviral infections. The lines with error bars indicate median with interquartile range. Differences were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test with post-hoc tests with multiple testing correction (Benjamini-Hochberg). * indicates P<0.05.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of the IMS compared with CRP and PCT.

More »

Table 3 Expand