Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Outlines of the main distributions of G. morsitans centralis and G. swynnerton (map drawn up based on data on each species in Rogers and Robinson 2004) [16].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Trapping devices used and their surface areas.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Daily catch rates of G. swynnertoni and G. pallidipes in Tanzania on different visual targets.

The limits of the boxes indicate the twenty-fifth and seventy-fifth percentiles, the solid line in the box is the median, the capped bars indicate the tenth and the ninetieth percentiles, and data points outside these limits are plotted as circles; dtr. mean is the detransformed mean.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Daily catch rates for G. m. centralis by different visual devices in Angola and DR Congo.

The limits of the boxes indicate the twenty-fifth and seventy-fifth percentiles, the solid line in the box is the median, the capped bars indicate the tenth and the ninetieth percentiles, and data points outside these limits are plotted as circles; dtr. mean is the detransformed mean.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Daily landing rates and catches of G. swynnertoni, G. m. centralis and G. pallidipes, respectively, on different targets and in pyramidal traps.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Tsetse landing indices (detransformed mean daily landings) per m2 and per m edge of different sized targets.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Daily landing rates and catches of G. m. centralis, respectively, on targets and in different trap types with and without the POCA bait.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Suspending a pyramidal trap with adhesive film on its panels from a tree in wooded savannah, Cabezo, central Angola.

More »

Fig 4 Expand