Fig 1.
Study flow of stool samples collection and analysis using the single, duplicate, quadruplicate Kato-Katz and FECPAKG2.
Table 1.
Estimated true prevalence, sensitivity and arithmetic mean egg counts from the 615 participants with complete baseline data according to the four different diagnostic methods.
Fig 2.
The estimated sensitivity of FECPAKG2 based on the infection intensity.
Fig 3.
Scatter plot of the egg counts based on FECPAKG2 and duplicate Kato-Katz egg counts.
Red line indicates egg density-ratio between Kato-Katz and FECPAKG2.
Fig 4.
True cure rates (True) and cure rates based on a single (KK1) duplicate (KK2), quadruplicate Kato-Katz (KK4) and FECPAKG2 (FP) against hookworm and T. trichiura for the four different treatment arms.
Cure rates against A. lumbricoides are not presented.
Fig 5.
True egg reduction rates (ERR) and ERRs based on single (KK1), duplicate (KK2), quadruplicate Kato-Katz (KK4) and FECPAKG2 after treatment with tribendimidine (TRB), tribendimidine-ivermectin (TRB-IVR), tribendimidine-oxantel pamoate (TRB-OXP) and albendazole-oxantel pamoate (ALB-OXP).
Egg reduction rates against A. lumbricoides are not presented.