Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Participant flow diagram.

Group A1, participants receiving PCECV according to the 4-site/1-week ID regimen; Group A2, participants receiving PCECV according to the 4-site/1-week ID regimen and HRIG at first visit; Group B1, participants receiving PCECV according to the 2-site/TRC regimen; Group B2, participants receiving PCECV according to the 2-site/TRC regimen and HRIG at first visit; PCECV, purified chick embryo cell culture vaccine; ID, intradermal; HRIG, human rabies immunoglobulin; TRC, Thai Red Cross; n, number of participants in each age stratum; N, number of participants in each group; PPS, per-protocol set. * One 11-year-old participant was erroneously randomized in Group B2. ** Not due to an adverse event.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Study design.

Group A1, participants receiving PCECV according to the 4-site/1-week ID regimen; Group A2, participants receiving PCECV according to the 4-site/1-week ID regimen and HRIG at first visit; Group B1, participants receiving PCECV according to the 2-site/TRC ID regimen; Group B2, participants receiving PCECV according to the 2-site/TRC ID regimen and HRIG at first visit; PCECV, purified chick embryo cell culture vaccine; ID, intradermal; HRIG, human rabies immunoglobulin; TRC, Thai Red Cross; D, day; BD, blood draw. Administration schemes represent injection sites. The syringe symbolizes 1 injection of 0.1 mL of PCECV vaccine.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Demographics characteristics of participants at enrolment.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of between-groups comparison of immune response to different PCECV regimens in terms of percentage of participants with RVNA concentrations ≥0.5 IU/mL and GMCs (per-protocol set at each time point).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Number and percentages of participants with solicited adverse events after any vaccination, and unsolicited and serious adverse events throughout the study (safety set).

More »

Table 3 Expand