Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Identification of positive and negative LAMP results using blue LED light illumination with a visualization unit that is integral to the Loopamp LF-160 incubator.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

STARD diagram describing the flow of samples from VL suspects in the study.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Clinical and demographic data of patients suspected of VL, distributed as case and controls after lymph node aspirate microscopy, participating in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the different diagnostic tests compared to lymph node aspirate microscopy (LNA-M), in a group of 185 VL suspects tested by all methods.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Plots of the false discovery rate and false omission rate with varying prevalence.

Note that for RDT the sensitivity is set to an arbitrary 99.9% and for LAMP-WB QIA specificity set to 99.9% from 100%.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Details and summary of the diagnostic performance of different studies using LAMP for VL diagnosis compared to our study.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Role of Loopamp Leishmania Detection Kit in the VL diagnostic algorithm.

More »

Fig 4 Expand