Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram of the participants and size of surveillance samples enrolled along the study.

*In Lapacho Alto community 9 months went by between the first and the second intervention and 14 months between second and third intervention. ∞In Kilometro 6 the period between first and second intervention was 9 months and between second and third intervention was 20 months.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Description of the baseline STH prevalence and coverage of the first Preventive Chemotherapy (PC) campaign by community.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the study population.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of baseline measurements between subjects of the surveillance group infected and uninfected with hookworm and S. stercoralis (n = 397).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Adjusted ODDS Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals of the associations of hookworm infection and S. stercoralis infection with a) anemia; b) eosinophilia, and c) stunting.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Correlation between hookworm´s infection intensity and hemoglobin level.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of prevalence before and after PC in Lapacho Alto and Kilometro 6 communities.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of relative IgG titers against S. stercoralis, between baseline and first and second follow-up*.

* Relative IgG titers (measured IgG units/selected cutoff) reported.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Hematological indicators along the study in Lapacho Alto and Kilometro 6 communities; A) evolution of hemoglobin level after first and second deworming and B) changes in prevalence of anemia by age and gender.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of mean height for age z-score (HAZ) between baseline and follow up by age group (A) pre-school age children (PSAC and (B) school age children.

More »

Fig 6 Expand