Table 1.
Participants in urine microbiome study from Eggua, southwestern Nigeria.
Fig 1.
The most dominant genera and their respective families in the urinary tract microbiome of individuals in Eggua, southwest Nigeria.
Dark colors represent lower abundance, lighter colors represent higher abundance.
Fig 2.
(A) Mean relative abundance of various phyla in the urine microbiome of a study population in Eggua, southwestern Nigeria. (B) Bar plot of the Firmicutes/Proteobacteria log abundance ratio in different states of urogenital schistosomiasis. The correlation was not significant (p = 0.08). (C)Abundance of phyla Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes with regard to gender in the urine microbiome of a study population in Eggua, southwestern Nigeria (p<0.05). (D) Proportions of filtered OTU counts in urogenital schistosomiasis and controls(p = 2.06E-16).
Fig 3.
Comparison of microbiome diversity indices (A) between urogenital schistosomiasis infection and controls, (B) in different states of urogenital schistosomiasis and controls, and (C) among age groups. Dark band represent mean diversity index, circles represent outliers. The differences in diversity were not significant (p>0.05) except in C(p = 0.038).
Fig 4.
(A) Principal Coordinates biplot of beta diversity in different states of urogenital schistosomiasis and controls. Circle and small typeset represent Greengenes ID of dominant OTUs. These dominant OTUs were mainly assigned to Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus, but had little influence on disease status. (B) Partial canonical correspondence analysis of age groups without the influence of urogenital schistosomiasis infection. Blue fonts are age categories, red typeface are Greengenes ID of the most influential OTU. Clustering together indicates no special correlation with age group. OTUs that corresponded closely with participants aged sixty years were mainly assigned to Acinetobacter.
Fig 5.
Specific urinary microbes are abundant in different states of urogenital schistosomiasis infection.
(A) Differentially abundant microbiome families in urogenital schistosomiasis (infected) and controls (non-infected), (B) Differentially abundant microbiome genera in urogenital schistosomiasis (infected) and controls (non-infected), (C) Differential microbiome genera between urogenital schistosomiasis (infection-only) and urogenital schistosomiasis induced bladder pathology (advanced), (D) Differentially abundant microbiome genera in non-infected bladder pathology (pathology-only) and urogenital schistosomiasis induced bladder pathology (advanced) (FDR<0.05). Differential abundance was measured with LogFC, the log2 of the number of times the OTUs belonging to a genus (or family) are more numerous in one group relative to the other. Circle on a vertical line represents a bacterial genus or family colored by their phylum and the genus or family is named at the end of the line. More than one circle on a vertical line represents species of the same genus. The genus is labeled on the x-axis. UC represents a genus whose identity could not be completely confirmed, but with known family or order. Abundant microbes in each of the two groups are presented on either side of the middle zero line.
Fig 6.
Urogenital schistosomiasis and induced bladder pathology result in specific microbiome changes in the urinary tract.
Differentially abundant microbiome (A) between urogenital schistosomiasis induced bladder pathology (advanced) and healthy controls, and (B) between urogenital schistosomiasis (infection-only) and healthy controls (FDR<0.05). Differential abundance was measured with LogFC, the log2 of the number of times the OTUs belonging to a genus (or family) are more numerous in one group relative to the other. Circle on a vertical line represents a bacterial genus or family colored by their phylum and the genus or family is named at the end of the line. More than one circle on a vertical line represents species of the same genus. The genus is labeled on the x-axis. UC represents a genus whose identity could not be completely confirmed, but with known family or order. Abundant microbes in each of the two groups are presented on either side of the middle zero line.
Fig 7.
Predicted microbial biomarkers in urogenital schistosomiasis cases (infected) and controls (non-infected).
Fig 8.
Predicted biochemical changes in the KEGG Ortholog database due to microbiome differences between urogenital schistosomiasis cases (infected) and controls (non-infected).